EuroSkills 2020 postponed ‘indefinitely’ due to Covid-19

The EuroSkills 2020 competition, in which the UK was due to compete in January, has been postponed indefinitely due to the “worsening Covid-19 situation in Europe”.

Having originally been scheduled to take place in the Austrian city of Graz last month, EuroSkills was pushed back to January 2021 while the Austrian authorities re-organised to mitigate against the spread of the virus.

But WorldSkills UK chief executive Neil Bentley Gockmann said that his organisation has, this morning, been informed by WorldSkills Europe and the board of EuroSkills Graz 2020 that the decision has been taken to cancel the event again.

He added that WorldSkills UK was “saddened” by the “very difficult decision,” but “fully” understands it.

“We had been working closely with our colleagues in Graz to develop a comprehensive Covid-19 prevention concept but without being able to guarantee the safety of all delegates it is not viable to hold an event at this time.”

He thanked all of the Team UK members and training staff who have been working “tirelessly  to prepare for this competition”, and confirmed that training will continue for WorldSkills Shanghai, set to take place next September.

A statement posted on the competition website says the worsening Covid-19 situation and the stepping up of restrictions has “created enormous challenges” for event licensor WorldSkills Europe and the organisers EuroSkills 2020 GmbH.

Supervisory board chairman of EuroSkills 2020 GmbH Josef Herk stressed that while they had “no choice” but to postpone, the event is “not abandoned”: “We definitely intend to make the European Skills Championships happen at a later date.

“We are currently in close discussion with the international decision-making bodies.”

Speaking to FE Week last month, when announcing the team of 14 young skilled people who would represent the UK in Graz, WorldSkills UK deputy chief executive Ben Blackledge said it would be “fairly naïve” to say there was no chance EuroSkills would be postponed or cancelled.

The competition organisers had been looking at holding the opening and closing ceremonies with fewer people, and having members of the public taken on guided tours of the competition, rather than being allowed to move freely around the competition area.

WorldSkills UK’s own LIVE event was called off earlier this year, and will now take place virtually during November.

F1 in Schools zoom to success with innovative 2020 UK National Finals event

For the first time in the 20-year history of F1 in Schools National Finals events, teams vying to become National Champions were unable to compete together at a live event. F1 in Schools however, were determined not to shatter the dreams of so many students and created an exciting livestreamed finals to meet the demands of the new environment we are all living in. With the 34 teams racing live and over 5000 students watching online Britannia Red from Robert May’s School, Odiham, Hampshire, took the 2020 F1 in Schools National Champions crown in a thrilling climax to this year’s competition.

In March 2020 this leading global STEM challenge, had completed its 12 UK Regional Finals and was set for an April UK F1 in Schools National Finals live event with 34 teams competing for the coveted UK Champions title and university scholarships. As with so many events, the finals had to be postponed, with lockdown, school closures and social distancing three major challenges to making it happen at all this year.

F1 in Schools were determined that the students could see the fruition of their hard work, but had to take a different approach to replace their annual 2-day live event. An innovative hybrid event was created, combining live racing with video presentations, written submissions and distanced car scrutineering, all assessed remotely by a panel of expert judges.

The highly professional livestreamed event was hosted by Tom Deacon, from Formula 1’s Esports series, with Georgina Edwards, an alumni of the competition as pundit, and Sophie Harker, an aerodynamics and performance engineer at BAE Systems and winner of the IET’s Young Women Engineer of the Year Award 2018, providing expert car analysis.

The trio of presenters presided over the racing, ensuring all the teams could watch the performance of their cars on the F1 in Schools race track. The track action was accompanied by video conference team interviews and messages of support from F1 drivers. Lenovo UK provided the technical infrastructure to enable the event which culminated in a livestreamed awards presentation with the hosts announcing category winners and the top three podium winners.

Andrew Denford, Founder and Chairman, F1 in Schools, said of this F1 in Schools UK 2020 competition, “It’s been a roller coaster of a year for all the teams. They wanted to complete their journey and compete nationally, with many having spent quite a few years participating and desperately wanting to win a place in the World Finals, so we wanted to make it happen. Today’s event was a very accomplished ‘plan B’ and although the teams couldn’t all be together, they were able to compete and share in the excitement of the competition.

“I congratulate all the teams for their perseverance and resilience. Today has proved that they can overcome the challenges that they are faced with and succeed. I’m sure all the students have bright futures ahead of them, I know they will all have learnt so many skills from F1 in Schools that will benefit them in their careers ahead.”

Britannia Red, with team members: Amelia Dorward, 15, Ted Hodgson, 16, Zach Taylor 16, Abi Bessant 15, Caoimhe Thomas, 15, and Callum Green, 15, celebrated their victory with confetti, albeit on their own at school and not on the top step of the podium with all the teams celebrating. They will receive the receive the impressive National Champions trophy a visit to a future FORMULA 1 BRITISH GRAND PRIX courtesy of Silverstone with an F1 team garage tour and exclusive behind the scenes paddock tour courtesy of Formula 1, as well as winning an F1 team factory tour and valuable UCL Mechanical Engineering bursaries. On route to overall victory Britannia Red also won the Best Engineered Car Award.

Team Manager, Amelia says of winning, “It’s fantastic that we took the National Champions title, but it was very different to be competing at an event that we couldn’t attend. We’ve been used to sitting round a table to share ideas and work together, but we’ve had lots of online meetings, and lockdown actually gave us more time to work on F1 in Schools. We’re all really passionate about it, so we’ve really enjoyed doing the competition, it’s very rewarding, opening up lots of opportunities, for example, presenting to sponsors, as well as enriching our lives – although it’s pretty stressful too”.

The F1 in Schools National Finals events are usually one of the biggest live celebrations of the UK’s young STEM talent, drawing together teams from across the UK who have won through from regional finals. The teams compete in a two-day event, with over 500 students showcasing their miniature Formula 1 cars. Not only do the students have to design, build and test a fast car, they also need to demonstrate their engineering understanding with a verbal presentation to a judging panel of industry experts, present their work with a pit display and portfolio and have their model car scrutineered to meet with strict rules and regulations.

The F1 in Schools National Finals 2020 took place with the support of Formula 1, Denford, the IET, Lenovo, Autodesk, the Project Management Institute Educational Foundation, UCL Engineering, FIA Women in Motorsport FE Week and FE Week.

Full results of the F1 in Schools UK National Finals 2020:

Award

 

Winners

Professional Class

   

UK National Champions Supported by Lenovo

 

Britannia Red, Robert May’s School

2nd Place Supported by IET

 

Electron, St. Olave’s Grammar School

3rd Place Supported by IET

 

Eclipse, Queen Elizabeth’s Grammar School

Scotland Champions Supported by EIM

 

Genesis, Linlithgow Academy

Wales Champions Supported by EIM

 

Nemesis Inferno, Pencoed Comprehensive School

Fastest Car Supported by Denford

 

Aquila Racing, Aylsham High School

Best Engineered Car Supported by Autodesk

 

Britannia Red, Robert May’s School

Research & Development  Supported by Lenovo

 

Aquila Racing, Aylsham High School

Presentation  Award

 

Britannia Red, Robert May’s School

Portfolio  Supported by PMIEF

 

Genesis, Linlithgow Academy

Pit Display  Supported by Gratnells

 

Eclipse, Queen Elizabeth’s Grammar School

Sponsorship & Marketing Supported by Nissan

 

Slidesports Entity, Hanson School

Team Identity  Supported by Technology Supplies

 

Optimum Racing, Whitley Bay High School

Digital Media  Supported by ID PR

 

Nemesis Inferno, Pencoed Comprehensive School

 

   

Development Class

   

National Champions Supported by Lenovo

 

IQ, North London Collegiate

2nd Place Supported by IET

 

Nova Racing, Kimbolton School

3rd Place Supported by IET

 

Dynamic Racing, Monifieth High School

Fastest Car Supported by Denford

 

IQ, North London Collegiate

Best Engineered Car Supported by Autodesk

 

Nova Racing, Kimbolton School

Research & Development  Supported by Lenovo

 

Peregrine Racing, Broughton High School

Sponsorship & Marketing Supported by Nissan

 

EMERUS, Simon Langton Grammar School for Boys

Team Identity  Supported by Technology Supplies

 

SuffraJETS, Whitley Bay High School

Presentation  Award

 

IQ, North London Collegiate

Pit Display  Supported by Gratnells

 

BLACKOUT, St John’s College Cardiff

Portfolio  Supported by PMIEF

 

Dynamic Racing, Monifieth High School

Digital Media  Supported by ID PR

 

CHSPEED, Cheadle Hulme School

Judges Choice Supported by Denford

 

Enhance Racing by McL&H, Linlithgow Academy

 

About F1 in Schools

Andrew Denford, an entrepreneurial engineer working within the education sector, founded the F1 in Schools STEM Challenge in the UK in 2000. He implemented a STEM programme that uses the high profile, glamorous and high-tech world of fast cars and Formula 1 to engage and inspire students, introducing them to engineering in a compelling and unique educational competition. Today this world-leading global educational initiative operates in 48 countries worldwide. 

 Researching, designing, making and racing an F1 car of the future is at its core. Teams then race each other head-to-head on the F1 in Schools 20 metre racetrack. The challenge can be used as an education tool or hook to engage students in STEM subjects. This gives students the opportunity to develop key skills such as communication, presenting and teamwork, while forming the foundation for any career path they choose to follow. 

The students assess their performance against other schools at a series of regional finals around the country. The best teams at each regional final compete at their National Finals and success at this level earns them a place at the World Finals. 

The world champions win scholarships for City, University London and UCL Engineering and the coveted Formula 1 F1 in Schools World Champions trophy.

This Formula 1 supported global STEM programme is also a proven route to motorsport and automotive careers with former participants working in Formula 1 teams, engine manufacturers, sports agencies and many more allied companies.

For further information about F1 in Schools visit www.F1inSchools.co.uk and follow us on social media.

One government department failed to recruit a single apprentice in 2019-20

Not a single apprentice started work at the Department for International Development in 2019-20.

That’s according to the latest data on how the government is progressing towards the public sector target of employing at least 2.3 per cent of their total staff as new apprentices between 2018 and 2021.

The Department for International Development’s failure to start any apprentices last year comes despite the department employing around 3,600 staff.

In the same year, the Department for Education managed 2.8 per cent of its headcount, with 188 starts, falling just shy of 2018-19’s record of 2.9 per cent.

In 2017-18, the first year of the 2.3 per cent target, 2.5 per cent of the DfE’s workforce were new apprentice starts.

Of the big three government departments, the Treasury had 2.4 per cent of starts as a total of headcount last year; the Foreign Office had 2 per cent; and the Home Office had 1.1 per cent.

HMRC came top of the table for 2019-20, employing 3,038 new apprentices (5.8 per cent of its workforce).

The Department for Exiting the European Union also didn’t recruit any apprentices in 2019-20, but this shouldn’t come as a surprise as it closed in January 2020.

The Civil Service overall is still working towards the target: the data shows its percentage of apprenticeship starts as a proportion of headcount in 2019-20 was 2.1 per cent.

The public-sector apprenticeship target covers the period April 1 to March 31 each year.

It is run as an average target across the years 2017-18 to 2020-21 to “give flexibility to organisations to manage peaks and troughs in recruitment,” the government has said.

Departments who missed the 2.3 per cent target this year have been given an adjusted target to ensure they meet the 2.3 per cent average by March 2021, the Cabinet Office said with this latest release.

Public bodies have until 30 September to submit their progress towards the target each year.

For more analysis and reaction see this week’s edition of FE Week, to be published on Friday.

Profile: Jenna Wrathall Bailey

JL Dutaut meets a high-performance skills coach whose experience shines a light on the challenges facing the necessary education revolution

What does it mean to prepare someone for the modern world of work? What does it take to retain skilled staff in an economy increasingly defined by transience? On many levels – whether it’s about tying in with local and national industrial strategies, mapping a broad and balanced curriculum or recruiting and retaining staff or students – these questions are central to the sector.

More than that, they are professionally relevant whether you are in the boardroom, the staffroom or the common room. Perhaps that’s in part why Boris Johnson this week chose an audience of students and staff at Exeter College to announce his plans for a new ‘Lifetime Skills Guarantee’. As the Prime Minister himself said, “the British economy is in the process of huge and rapid change”, and “the [Covid] crisis has compressed that revolution”.

In this tumultuous context, meeting Jenna Wrathall Bailey for the first time was surprising on many fronts. To be sure, WorldSkills UK’s high-performance skills coach has held her fair share of posts, from lecturer at Preston’s College, through curriculum leader at Ashton Community College, to quality assessment coordinator at Myerscough College; and nationally from external quality assurer for awarding body VTCT to private consultant. So far, so modern.

At school I was plodding along but this put fire in my belly

But a thread runs through her career – one that has already resulted in being awarded an MBE for services to vocational skills. Throughout it all, almost from the moment she passed the A levels everyone else wanted her to do and made her way onto the college course she’d always aspired to, Wrathall Bailey has been involved with WorldSkills. It is in that long-term partnership, how it began and its impact not only on her but on so many leaders, teachers and students she has worked with, that policy makers, not least the Prime Minister, might find some fruitful ideas about navigating the economic straits ahead.

FE Week readers will be familiar with WorldSkills. The international organisation coordinates the efforts of 79 member countries and regions and is best known for its bi-annual skills championships, last held in Kazan, Russia in 2019 and next due to be held in Shanghai in 2021. But in between the showcase events, it does much more than that, and in her new role for WorldSkills UK, Wrathall Bailey is central to that here.

As high-performance skills coach, her role at the heart of the organisation’s new Centre for Excellence programme, launched this month, is two-fold. First, it is to support colleges, working mainly with lecturers and curriculum leads, “taking everything that we have learned globally, and supporting them and saying, we’ve learned this information, these are the standards we’re seeing, these are the techniques we use, the mindsets, methodologies, and this might be useful to embed within your sessions.” Second is “sitting on various boards and reviewing national occupational standards” across a variety of sectors.

Initially, the Centre for Excellence will work with 20 centres, selected from 55 applicants. The application process means all involved have elected to be there, but Wrathall Bailey doesn’t take their engagement for granted. “We’re just educators,” she says. She is evidently conscious as only a classroom practitioner can be of the barriers the profession sometimes erects to protect itself from external influences that too often border on criticism. “Educators who just had an amazing opportunity to go to WorldSkills and are just basically bringing back what we’ve learned, and hopefully our passion and our drive will break down barriers and get them hooked as much as we are.”

With Wrathall Bailey, that drive and passion are authentic. As is her professional identity as an educator. Though she is no longer practising in the classroom in her role at Myerscough College, she taught altogether 14 years. But Wrathall Bailey is not simply an educator who went to WorldSkills. She is just as much a WorldSkills competitor who went into education.

You can work towards excellence and you can do well in any career

Aged 16, Wrathall Bailey wanted nothing more than to study beauty therapy. She’d done so since a neighbour – a beauty therapy lecturer – had taken her to work to be a model for the day. “And I just thought ‘oh my God, I really want to do this’. I think I’d be good at it. And I think that’s the difference: at school I was plodding along, but this put fire in my belly.”

That early contact, not just with beauty therapy but with the teaching of it, was crucial for her, as it is for so many at that age. Much has been said about the disadvantage this year’s GCSE cohort are at because of the pandemic, but very little has been focused on the fact that many will have missed out on work experience. Too few have Wrathall Bailey’s luck of knowing someone passionate about a profession, and placements play an important part in creating that opportunity. This group’s severely disrupted year 10 will have robbed many of it with potentially important consequences, made worse if under-appreciated in mitigating the crisis for them.

But luck isn’t enough. Having discovered that passion, she was put off the idea by a careers interview at school. “The careers advisor told me ‘no don’t go and do beauty therapy. Your grades will be too high for that’. So I got shuffled into going to do my A levels and I really did not enjoy it.”

That experience, unfortunately, remains far from atypical for any student who is remotely high-performing. The Prime Minister’s first job will have to be to tackle the various incentives that perpetuate it if he is ever to deliver on this week’s bold promise “to fix a problem that has plagued this country for decades […] the pointless, snooty, and frankly vacuous distinction between the practical and the academic”.

For Wrathall Bailey, the distinction seemed vacuous anyway. Her grades from Blackpool Sixth Form could have secured her a place at university but instead, she chose her passion. “At age 18, you can start obviously thinking for yourself, and I thought ‘no, beauty therapy is what I want to do’. You can work towards excellence and you can do well in any career. So I went there.”

I’m just glad that I’m part of the movement that’s trying to change perceptions

And it was there that lecturers picked up on her passion and potential and introduced her to WordSkills for the first time, beginning a relationship that has so far lasted 21 years. “Those tutors must have seen something in me, a few attributes that made them think ‘she’s suitable for going off and representing the college’. So I did and I was lucky enough to win it.”

Following her gold medal at the national beauty therapy competition, she was selected to represent Team UK for the WorldSkills global competition in Montreal in 1999. She took second place in her category. The following year, WorldSkills awarded her for her ‘outstanding performance’ at the skill Olympics.

After that, her focus was on developing her career in education. “Aspirations grow only because you can see what’s open to you,” she tells me, and WorldSkills had opened her eyes, so it wasn’t long befoe she struck up the partnership again. By 2006, she was a regional judge and in 2007 a mentor for the Team UK competitors in Japan. In various roles, she has supported Team UK in Calgary, Sao Paulo and Kazan too and worked as a training manager for the EuroSkills division too.

All in all, it’s quite a journey for the girl from Poulton-le-Fylde with the “really lovely childhood”, the butcher’s daughter who in so many parallel stories ends up at university to fulfil a socially constructed notion of aspiration and success. “I don’t blame that careers advisor,” she tells me. “I’m just glad that I’m part of the movement that’s trying to change perceptions.”

The longevity of her involvement speaks volumes to the overplayed notion of the gig economy. Here too, Wrathall Bailey thinks there’s a problem with perception. “For employers, I think it’s about being brave enough to invest in their employees. I’ve seen it with my competitors. They get chosen for WorldSkills UK, and then the employer thinks ‘they are going to leave me so I’m not going to invest’.”

If this is indeed the case, then it’s little surprise the Prime Minister’s Lifetime Skills Guarantee pitch is aimed at adults who want to retrain altogether rather than those who want to get on. All well and good for a changing economy, but focusing on sideways movement and subsidising training does little to encourage employers to take responsibility or to help employees and the economy level up.

On that front too, Wrathall Bailey has been lucky. WorldSkills have demonstrated precisely the opposite approach, and one that is perfectly consistent with their aims and values.

When the letter arrived to inform her of her MBE, Wrathall Bailey thought she was opening a parking ticket. Her husband thought she was having him on. Yet so far she has led Team UK beauty therapy competitors to 4 gold medals, a silver, a medallion of excellence, two best-of-nation awards and an Albert Vidal Award. In any Olympic sport, she might even be a household name.

If WorldSkills had anything to do with it, she would be.

The prime minister’s plan to “close the gap with other countries that have had the edge on us when it comes to skills and technical education” may very well depend on that kind of revolution.

ESFA to launch £80m adult education budget tender

The Department for Education is gearing up to launch a new £80 million tender for the national adult education budget.

It will be a “re-procurement” exercise, and follow the same scope as the controversial AEB tender that caused havoc in 2017 – the contracts for which will expire next year.

A “commercial pipeline” DfE document, published today, states that the tender was supposed to get underway on 1 July, but FE Week understands it is not due to launch until around November.

The contract commencement date is set for 1 August 2021.

The DfE’s commercial pipeline document also reveals that the upcoming tender for 19 to 24 traineeships, due to launch this week, will total £77 million.

The previous AEB procurement was run in 2017 but was plagued with delays and had to be completely redone after the Education and Skills Funding Agency realised it was botched.

And when the final outcomes were released most providers had their funding slashed – including one case of a 97 per cent cut.

Providers teamed up to threaten the ESFA with legal action before the agency found additional funding to top up contracts.

The upcoming AEB tender will just be for the national budget, not for devolved combined authorities which run their own procurements.

Five things we learned from the IfATE’s 2019-20 accounts

The Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education has today published its annual accounts for 2019-20, revealing a substantial pay discrepancy between the quango’s former and new chief executive.

This is the third year of the institute’s existence.

Here are five things we learned from the accounts.

 

1 – Sir Gerry was paid £20k more than the institute’s new CEO

The institute parted ways with its first chief executive, Sir Gerry Berragan, in November. Despite leaving just over half-way through the financial year, he earned himself a £5,000 bonus.

But what is most notable is the difference in his pay with new IfATE boss Jennifer Coupland. Berragan was paid between £140,000 and £145,000 a year, whilst Coupland is now on £120,000 to £125,000.

The accounts provide no explanation for the pay discrepancy.

 

2 – Costs and staff numbers increase owing to T Levels

The institute’s accounts show that its costs have increased by £6.3 million from £13.5 million to £19.8 million this year, which reflects “our additional workload, most specifically in relation to T Levels”.

The institute’s role expanded to technical education in 2019.

The increase in costs can mostly be attributed to a growing staff headcount – which rose from 146 permanent employees in 2018-19, to 167 in 2019-20.

“Programme costs” have also shot up from £1.7 million to £4.3 million. The accounts explain the most significant increase in programme costs has been “£1.6 million of expenditure incurred in respect of  T Level contracts” to awarding bodies.

 

3 – EQA charges total £420k

The institute is itself an external quality assurance provider for apprenticeships, but contracts this work out to awarding organisation Open Awards.

A controversial fee of £40 is charged to end-point assessment organisations for each apprentice Open Awards quality assures.

The accounts show that for 2019-20, the institute recorded income of £420,000 for EQA charges, which means around 10,500 apprentice were quality assured by the IfATE in that year.

The institute has previously said the £40 charge is on a “cost-recovery basis” only.

 

4 – Number of appeals go down

Trailblazer employer groups can seek a ‘Procedural Review’, formerly known as an appeal, of a decision or recommendation made by the institute, which usually relate to funding bands for apprenticeship standards.

In total the institute received 29 requests for a Procedural Review in 2019-20, compared with 37 in 2018-19.

Just three of the requests were granted.

 

5 – IfATE to move in with DfE?

The accounts state that the lease on the institute’s offices in central London is up in March 2021. The premises costs increased from £1.2 million to £1.7 million in 2019-20.

The institute is now “currently planning” on moving to Sanctuary Buildings, the offices of the DfE, to be “closer to our DfE colleagues”. The aim is to finalise this move “without disruption to our activities towards the end of the financial year”.

The goal of this move is to provide “value for money and flexibility for our staff and our stakeholders”, the accounts add.

Two big exam board winners in third wave of T Levels

The awarding organisations that will develop, deliver and award the six T Levels being rolled out from 2022 are Pearson and City & Guilds.

Following a tender, City & Guilds has been handed contracts totalling almost £12.5 million to develop qualifications in engineering, manufacturing, processing and control; maintenance, installation and repair for engineering and manufacturing; design and development for engineering and manufacturing; and management and administration.

Pearson has won contracts totalling £4 million for finance and accounting.

Each of the qualifications make up wave three of the T Levels rollout.

Apprenticeships and skills minister Gillian Keegan said: “Now more than ever, it’s vital we support students to gain the skills they need to progress and employers and our economy need to grow.

“Many have gone above and beyond to make sure this milestone for T Levels is achieved. I want to thank everyone for their continued hard work and I look forward to seeing these new qualifications launch in 2022.”

Jennifer Coupland, chief executive of the Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education, said: “I would like to congratulate everyone on delivering another important step forward for T Levels. It is fantastic that this has been achieved on schedule despite all the challenges posed by Covid-19 pandemic.”

Wave one of the T Levels rollout got underway last month. The new post-16 qualifications are the technical equivalent to A-levels and combine classroom theory, practical learning and a three-month (minimum 45 day) industry placement with an employer. 

NCFE and Pearson are now delivering the first three T Levels – for education and childcare; digital production, design and development; and design, surveying and planning for construction – which students began studying in September.

NCFE and City & Guilds are developing more T Levels for launch next academic year – covering digital business services; digital support services; health, healthcare science, and science; and onsite construction and building services engineering.

David Phillips, managing director for City & Guilds, said: “We are absolutely delighted to have been awarded the contracts to deliver three engineering and manufacturing T Levels and the business and administration T Level. These qualifications will help shape the lives of many young people by giving them a great start in their careers.

“As the next generation enters the workforce, they will be facing unprecedented challenges as well as new opportunities and we are honoured to get the opportunity to take on a larger role helping to equip these learners with the skills they will need to flourish in their careers.”

Cindy Rampersaud, senior vice president at Pearson UK, said: “We are delighted to be delivering the finance and accounting T Level pathways from September 2022.  We look forward to supporting learners as they begin their programmes of study, and playing our part in developing talent in two areas which are so vital for our economy.

“We will draw on our experience of delivering first wave T Levels in the construction and digital pathways, as well as our longstanding collaboration and partnership with government, employers and providers to design, develop and deliver world class qualifications.”

Mergers drag down college Ofsted grades

Ofsted inspection results for the college sector at the end of last year fell for the first time in three years after a substantial number of merged colleges received a grade three.

FE Week’s annual analysis of inspection grades shows that 76 per cent of general FE colleges have been placed in the top two grades as of August 31, 2020, down from 78 per cent at the end of 2018/19.

This proportion had been rising steadily since a low of 69 per cent in 2016/17 but appears to have been stifled by a number of merged colleges receiving full inspections for the first time and performing poorly.

However, Ofsted said that as inspections were paused in March 2020, “we should be cautious about reading too much into relatively small fluctuations that have taken place since the suspension of inspections makes it difficult to compare last year with the previous one”.

FE Week’s analysis shows that of the 144 general FE colleges currently with inspection grades, 17 are rated ‘outstanding’, 92 are judged as ‘good’, and 35 are ‘requires improvement’. None are ‘inadequate’.

There were 30 new full inspections during 2019/20, which resulted in three grade ones, 14 grade twos, and 13 (43 per cent) grade threes.

Of the 30, 19 were first ever inspections of merged colleges and seven (37 per cent) of those resulted in ‘requires improvement’ outcomes.

We should be cautious about reading too much into relatively small fluctuations

The gradual rise in the proportion of colleges rated ‘good’ or ‘outstanding’ in previous years was partly because when colleges merge, many of them grade three and four, they are removed from Ofsted’s figures. But many of the newly-formed institutions have now been inspected.

Between September 2015 and March 2019 the Department for Education carried out post-16 area reviews, which resulted in 57 mergers by April 1, 2019. An additional 13 college mergers have taken place since then.

There are currently 21 colleges that have no Ofsted grade as a result of these mergers, many of which were due to be inspected between April and July had inspectors not been stood down during the pandemic.

FE Week’s analysis shows that two colleges fell out of the top ‘outstanding’ category last year, with Walsall College receiving a grade two and Gateshead College dropping to grade three.

Ofsted would not be drawn on whether its new inspection framework, introduced in September 2019, had anything to do with the overall dip in college performance. 

Covid hampering Ofsted’s window for merged college inspections

The coronavirus pandemic is causing Ofsted to miss its own window for inspecting merged colleges.

The watchdog’s FE and skills inspection handbook states that a “newly merged college will normally receive a full inspection within three years of the merger”.

FE Week analysis shows that there are four colleges that have already passed that three-year inspection window, and a further four will exceed it by the end of this calendar year.

Seven of the eight have, however, received monitoring visits since their merger.

Ofsted paused its inspection regime in March when lockdown hit. While a number of “interim visits” are being carried out this autumn at FE providers, full inspections are not set to resume until January 2021.

Calls are growing for the inspectorate to further extend this respite period as the UK battles against a second wave of Covid-19. Ofsted has said the timeline is being kept under constant review.

College leaders have only a tight window to spend £200 million of capital funds

The Department for Education should offer colleges a more flexible deadline for completing capital projects, writes Mark Robinson, chief executive at property services and design company Scape Group

The public sector has enjoyed something of a resurgence in government attention since the arrival of the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic. For years, the sector has been subject to financial restrictions and ever-diminishing resources. Education has been no exception.

However, the pandemic has caused government to look to the sector as a vehicle for stimulating economic activity – particularly in construction – as the availability of private capital recedes.

For sixth forms and colleges, this is a significant win and what many may consider a timely shot in the arm as the government looks to get spades in the ground, whilst simultaneously upgrading education facilities across the country.

In August, the Department for Education set out plans to fast-track £200 million of infrastructure spend into more than 180 colleges. That funding has now begun to land in college bank accounts across the UK, firing the starter gun on a wave of new projects to help the country “build back better”.

Of those receiving funding, some will no doubt be keen to improve tired learning facilities. For others, it will be about increasing capacity at a time when the challenges of delivering a Covid-secure environment for students are becoming all too apparent.

But while such a sizeable capital injection will always be welcome, it comes caveated with its own conditions that will no doubt require FE leaders to sharpen their pencils.

There is a clear mandate from the top to get spades in the ground

Chief among these are the limitations on the type of work the funding can be used to deliver – any activity must replace or improve “failing” facilities.

Then there’s the timescale. The Department for Education is requesting that projects are completed by the end of next March. For anything beyond small-scale renovations, a six month window leaves very little room for manoeuvre.

This tight timeframe may have partly been suggested because the funding represents an early draw down on the £1.5 billion five year investment plan for further education announced by Rishi Sunak in the Spring Budget.

Given the funding is being taken from an investment pot accounted for over five years, it would seem sensible not to impose such a tight deadline in the short-term and allow some flex into the next financial year so colleges can spend it as efficiently as possible.

That being said, there is a clear mandate from the top to get spades in the ground quickly. Tight timeframes, in the eyes of the government – and, indeed, many economists – are needed to sustain momentum in the construction industry, which has shown signs of slowing in recent weeks.

If colleges are to take advantage of this windfall within the current timeframe, projects will need to be delivered with efficiency while maintaining high standards in build quality.

Direct-award construction and consultancy frameworks are not a new delivery route for educators looking to accelerate their projects, but they can go some way to take full advantage of the £200 million impetus. In essence, direct-award frameworks present a route whereby colleges can be matched with experienced construction partners.

Since the new funding began to land, we’ve noticed a spike in enquiries from colleges and sixth forms. These tend to fall into two camps.

First are those with a firm view on how to spend the money who need support accelerating the procurement process. The second group are those who need help in making sure they invest the money on the right elements of their maintenance backlog.

For example, some are considering whether to use the funding to tackle capacity issues in relation to Covid-19 or to direct it towards upgrading their energy infrastructure, in line with the wider public sector’s commitments to sustainability.

Undoubtedly, we face a difficult winter ahead balancing the needs of public health and the economy. Further education will play a key role in each.

The sector must have the flexibility and necessary support to finish much-needed capital projects within a reasonable framework.