Skip to content
3 July 2026

Latest news from FE Week

Burnham: Public contracts must deliver more apprenticeships

Andy Burnham’s first speech since launching his bid to be the next prime minister was widely trailed to go heavy on devolution, but alongside his pledge to shift power out of Whitehall, he set out plans to use government contracts to create apprenticeships and work placements for young people, end a university-first education system and devolve employment support. FE Week looks at what he did and didn’t say.

Andy Burnham has pledged to demand more work placements and apprenticeships for young people in return for giving British companies a better chance of winning government contracts.

The former Greater Manchester mayor said public procurement rules would be changed to help domestic suppliers become “more stable and competitive,” while ensuring firms winning contracts delivered greater benefits for young people and communities.

In his first major policy speech since returning to parliament last week, Burnham attacked a procurement culture he said had focused on “chasing cut-price deals around the world” rather than supporting British-based companies.

He promised “all eligible public contracts” would be subject to “proper social value weighting”, including contracts awarded through the government’s defence investment programme.

Burnham added: “In return, we will recycle maximum benefits for our communities and our residents, for instance by requiring a much greater supply of 45-day work placements and apprenticeships for young people.”

He stopped short of giving any targets or details on what sorts of contracts would be “eligible”.

Burnham pointed to Greater Manchester’s work with employers as evidence that the approach could deliver.

He said the city region had rung round businesses and secured “1,000 extra work placements” over the past year.

“That’s 1,000 extra young lives changed every year, and it shows what a place can do when it works as one,” he said.

However, Greater Manchester’s announcement in January described employers as having pledged 1,000 placements. It is unclear how many have so far been delivered.

Requirements already exist

Using government procurement policy to lever apprenticeships is not new, but evidence the current rules are creating new opportunities is hard to come by.

A policy introduced by the Conservative government in 2015 asked government departments and agencies to consider apprenticeships and skills places when awarding contracts worth at least £10 million and lasting 12 months or more.

It meant bidders could be asked how many apprenticeships they would create if they won, with successful suppliers’ commitments then written into contracts and monitored.

But public bodies were only “strongly encouraged” to do so.

Apprenticeship-specific guidance was withdrawn in 2023 and replaced by a wider central government “social value model”, worth at least 10 per cent of the available score when in-scope bodies assess contract bids.

The model lists apprenticeships, supported internships and T Level industry placements among other jobs and skills opportunities suppliers could offer.

But public bodies are not currently required to demand apprenticeships or work placements. Guidance provides public bodies with a menu of social-value outcomes that they can decide are most relevant to the contract they’re awarding. They also have to make sure those requirements are proportionate to the value of the contract and must not create disadvantages or barriers to potential suppliers, particularly small businesses.

Respondents to a recent government consultation on including a firmer measure on jobs and skills when assessing procurements worth over £5 million warned overly prescriptive requirements could increase bureaucracy and favour large companies.

Burnham did not offer details on overcoming those barriers for smaller businesses in his speech.

Parity klaxon

Burnham also promised a “complete rethink” of how young people are supported into work, saying he was taking “very seriously” Alan Milburn’s recent report on the rise of young people not in education, employment or training.

The report warned as many as one in six young people could be out of education and employment in the next five years, up from one in eight currently, without major reforms.

Burnham said the rethink “has to start with the education system”.

“The days of a school system configured entirely around the university route will be brought to an end,” he said.

“University is great for those who want it, but when are we going to focus on the life chances of those kids who want something different?

“The country has not done that for a long, long time.”

Burnham said politicians had argued for years for parity between academic and technical education.

In a speech following Labour’s major local election losses last month, which triggered Burnham’s run for parliament, Keir Starmer himself framed doing more for “the kids who are ignored, frankly, because society often only puts those who go to university on a pedestal” and then pledged to “go much further on our investment in apprenticeships [and] in technical education”.

Burnham echoed Starmer’s sentiment, saying he would build a “clear path” for “every young person into a reindustrialised Britain.”

Today’s speech follows the Starmer government’s claim last week that it will bring to an end a “degree by default” culture through its own “new deal for young people” by removing funding from degree courses that were deemed not to deliver good outcomes.

Burnham didn’t mention any changes to funding or provider accountability in his speech today.

Devolution without the detail

The bigger idea running through Burnham’s speech was a dramatic expansion of devolution across the country.

He described Britain as “one of the most over-centralised countries in the world” and argued that economic growth had been held back by power and resources remaining in Whitehall.

“It is time for Whitehall to accept that growth cannot be ordered from the top down,” he said. “Instead, it can only be nurtured from the bottom up.”

Burnham promised what he called the “biggest rebalancing of power our country has seen”, giving regions greater control over public services, industrial policy and regeneration.

That would include powers tailored to the needs of rural areas, coastal towns and places undergoing industrial transition, as well as “more powers for London too, over education and housing”.

But education was not among the three main areas of devolution Burnham went on to identify.

His proposed “Number 10 North” operation in Manchester would support regions with reform of essential utilities, reindustrialisation and the regeneration of places.

Burnham said the new operation would be “the nerve centre of a rewired Britain” and “the conduit through which we redistribute power and resources across the UK”.

It would coordinate national and local government, support areas to set long-term economic strategies and require government departments and agencies to provide local and strategic authorities with staff and resources.

“The days of Whitehall fighting the devolution of power into the regions and nations are over for good,” Burnham said.

“I have had 10 years of fighting the Whitehall machine, blocking this place’s progress, the progress of people here, and I am simply not prepared to accept the same for any area coming after Greater Manchester.”

However, Burnham did not say whether his devolution drive would extend to 16-to-19 education, apprenticeship funding or greater mayoral control over colleges and training provision.

Nor did he explain whether the reference to giving London “education” powers would be offered elsewhere or what those powers would cover.

The only skills-related responsibility he explicitly committed to devolving was employment support.

As mayor, Burnham argued that Greater Manchester could not deliver a fully integrated adult skills and employment system because the Department for Work and Pensions retained control over employment programmes and funding.

“We will answer the call from the mayors, and particularly the mayor of the North East, for devolution of employment support,” he said.

Burnham said services should work more through community and voluntary organisations “at a grassroots level”, using organisations people trust rather than requiring them to go to “places that they fear”.

Young people who need mental health support should also receive it as part of help to enter and remain in work.

Burnham claimed the approach would reduce the welfare bill “in a way that is fair and lasting and helps people move forward”.

DWP questions June 2026: live blog

Work and pensions secretary Pat McFadden and his ministers will take questions in the House of Commons this afternoon shortly after 2.30pm.

Follow below for live updates


 

Education has lost the confidence of too many white working class families

I’m rarely shocked or even greatly surprised by statistics that show how unequal life chances are in this country, but I was astounded by some of the findings in the independent inquiry into white working class educational outcomes, for which I was a board member. There are many, but how about this one – only 36 per cent of white working class children achieve grade 4s in English and maths GCSEs at the age of 16, compared with 72 per cent of the whole cohort not on free school meals.

Those findings have helped to shine a light on the fundamental misalignment between what many children, young people and their families want from the education system and what they are being offered. A misalignment that for far too long has been denied or overlooked by government, in the vain belief that ‘making the current system work better’ will close the enormous educational and life outcomes gaps driven by social class.

First of all, the report completely dismisses the myth that poor outcomes are somehow the fault of the children and young people themselves, as did the recent Milburn review report on young people not in education, employment or training (NEETs). White working class families and children do not lack ambition or potential, but they are not experiencing an education system they believe is meeting their needs or aspirations.

Time and again, the surveys, roundtables and interviews revealed a fundamental lack of belief that ‘education is designed for people like me’. For instance, only 43 per cent of parents believe that their child is learning skills they will use in real life.

That misalignment and lack of belief in education results, as the report shows, in large numbers of children disengaging with education because they do not believe it will help them in their lives. One headteacher said that absence has almost become normalised across groups of children and their families. And the data is shocking, with 38 per cent of white children on free school meals being persistently absent and 5 per cent severely absent.

So much for the shocking statistics, and there are many others that we should all be ashamed about. But it is not a report without hope; the inquiry found lots of schools and colleges doing excellent work to buck the trends.

For colleges, there is good recognition of the work they do to help young people belong and engage with a curriculum that inspires and motivates them. The report talks about colleges “as environments where many white working class young people successfully re-engage with education after difficult experiences in school”.

The report sets out a vision of hope and a call to arms, with pragmatic and well-thought through recommendations. For us in post-16, there are good recommendations to properly invest in colleges, in apprenticeships and in new higher education pathways that can be accessed locally. There’s also a focus on free public transport for all under 21s which would be a major enabler for all learners.

I do hope that this work gets the consideration it deserves. Across the education system, we can and must do better, because the ambitions and potential of too many children will continue to be wasted if we dbon’t. I also hope that the government and the education system collaborate now to implement the recommendations and rise to the call for action so that this picture changes, and changes soon.

 

The apprenticeships tipped for a rate rise

Business administration, accountancy and carpentry could be among apprenticeships in scope for funding band uplifts, FE Week analysis suggests.

Skills minister Jacqui Smith this week commissioned Skills England to provide urgent advice on which apprenticeship standards most used by under-25s are not funded at a “sufficient” level to incentivise take-up among training providers and employers.

And she admitted that six of the top 20 standards used by young people had never received a funding increase since their launch.

The stagnant six

Funding bands determine the maximum amount that can be drawn down from the apprenticeship budget for training and assessment per apprentice. There are 30 bands, which range from £1,500 to £27,000.

Providers have long argued that funding bands have failed to keep pace with inflation and course delivery costs, and employers fear it is financially risky to put young people onto such apprenticeships.

Smith said: “The government is determined to boost apprenticeship starts for young people and it is imperative that our funding rates incentivise this rather than hold it back.”

FE Week analysis of 2024-25 data (table below) shows the six apprenticeships the minister was likely referring to include the level 3 business administrator, which had 8,250 starts for under-25s and a funding rate of £5,000 since it launched in 2017, and the level 7 accountancy and taxation professional, with 7,650 starts for the same age bracket and funded at £21,000 since its approval in 2017. The accountancy standard is, however, now only available for people aged 21 and under, following the government’s crackdown on level 7 apprenticeships.

The pair were the second and third most popular apprenticeships for young people in 2024-25, behind the level 3 early years educator on 12,540 starts for under-25s, which itself was launched in 2019 with a £6,000 funding band before receiving an uplift to £7,000 two years ago.

Also in the group of six are the level 3 engineering technician and level 3 maintenance and operations engineering technician standards with 3,460 and 1,860 under-25 starts in 2024-25, respectively. Both were funded at the maximum band of £27,000 when approved a decade ago before receiving rate cuts to £26,000.

The level 3 maintenance and operations engineering technician was, however, replaced by two new standards at the end of 2025, both of which are funded at the maximum band of £27,000.

The level 3 information communications technician standard, which had 1,860 starts for young people, hasn’t had its £15,000 funding band change since its launch in 2021, nor has the level 3 dental nurse apprenticeship, also receiving 1,860 under-25 starts, which has been funded at £8,000 since it began in 2024.

Growth priorities

Smith said funding reviews should also be prioritised for apprenticeships that make a “strong contribution to growth and the priority skills to 2030 identified by Skills England across ten critical sectors, aligned with the government’s industrial strategy”.

The ten critical sectors are: creative industries, digital and technologies, housebuilding, clean energy, adult social care, professional and business services, life sciences, financial services, defence, and advanced manufacturing.

Popular apprenticeships among young people that fit into those sectors and could therefore be in line for funding band uplifts include the level 3 installation and maintenance electrician, with 6,390 starts in 2024-25 and a current funding band of £23,000, as well as the level 2 carpentry and joinery standard, which had 3,780 starts for the age group in the same year with a funding rate of £13,000.

The level 3 motor vehicle service and maintenance technician (light vehicle) apprenticeship, with 3,050 starts and a £16,000 funding band, could also fall into scope of an uplift, as could the level 3 assistant accountant, funded at £12,000 which had 2,560 starts, and the level 3 plumbing and domestic heating technician, funded at £22,000 with 2,350 starts.

Level 3 lead adult care worker, which had 1,970 starts for under-25s and a funding band of £4,000, is also in a priority sector and is among the 20 most popular standards for young people, as is the level 2 bricklayer with 1,850 starts and a £13,000 funding band.

Smith told Skills England to produce guidance on which standards should have their funding reviewed by July, and advise on potential rate changes by October.

The agency announced today that it will adopt a temporary model to decide funding bands in the coming months. Rather than asking occupational groups to supply quotes for costings, the agency will now use “actual assessment cost data to help set our estimate”.

 

Skills England scales back employer role in funding decisions

Skills England has announced it will no longer rely on employers when deciding funding levels for apprenticeships.

The agency today said it was implementing an “interim funding model” that it claimed would be “more responsive” and “enable faster, more consistent decisions”.

Skills England currently invites “occupational groups”, made up of employers, to submit their own costings, which are then balanced with the agency’s funding rates created using an independent evidence base and Office for National Statistics data.

But rather than asking occupational groups to supply quotes from assessment organisations, the agency will now make use of “actual assessment cost data to help set our estimate”.

“We may continue to ask occupational groups for advice and to offer on-programme costings where needed,” the agency added.

The interim model will be in place for the rest of 2026 at least, with a permanent new funding model to be tested this summer.

It comes days after skills minister Jacqui Smith instructed Skills England to urgently review apprenticeship funding bands with a view to uplift some rates to grow the number of people aged under 25 starting apprenticeships. Skills England must identify priority standards by July and recommend potential new funding rates by October.

‘Sensible step’

Simon Ashworth, deputy CEO and director of policy at the Association of Employment and Learning Providers, said the membership body agreed that the funding band review model needed a refresh.

“The current process has been too slow, with some of the most popular apprenticeship standards for young people not having their funding bands reviewed since they were introduced in 2017,” he told FE Week.

“Making greater use of actual delivery data is a sensible step, and Skills England has previously indicated it wanted to move away from a quote-based approach as apprenticeship assessment reforms take effect, so this change is not unexpected.”

Skills England’s funding model change applies to all “skills products” within its remit, including apprenticeships, apprenticeship units and foundation apprenticeships.

The agency, which is the successor to the Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education, has not disclosed which datasets or calculations underpin its interim model, other than “actual assessment costs”, or whether employers will be able to challenge its decisions.

It did reveal that the agency “may” seek advice from its expert network, made up of occupational and sector stakeholders, before making a final recommendation through its “internal governance processes” and then approaching the work and pensions secretary for approval.

The guidance outlined scenarios where funding for a skills product would be reviewed. These included instances where there is a significant change in duration, the addition or removal of a mandatory qualification or significant changes in content.

Ashworth added: “Getting funding band decisions right is essential and we will continue engaging closely with Skills England as the new model develops.

“There are still wider concerns that need addressing though, including the longstanding £27,000 funding band cap, which continues to affect the deliverability of provision in some of the government’s priority sectors. It is also too early to judge how assessment reform will affect future funding bands, but this is something we will be watching carefully.”

SEND help to general FE, specialist teachers told

Expert staff at specialist post-16 institutions could guide general FE colleges on how best to spend new inclusion cash, officials have said.

Under guidance published today, the Department for Education said 16-to-19 providers receiving a share of its £73 million inclusive mainstream fund could commission specialist colleges to deliver bespoke training to staff, or organise shadowing or placements in specialist settings.

The suggestions were among an outline of how the grant money could be spent, including delivering adaptive teaching, an inclusive environment and “ambitious” leadership.

A new “inclusive education estates” strategy was also published and reminds local authorities that high-needs capital allocations should be spent in post-16 settings as well as schools.

The two initiatives are among a package of reforms to embed inclusive practice across mainstream education in England.

Earlier this month, the DfE published a breakdown of colleges and training providers receiving a share of £73 million of inclusive mainstream fund allocations for 2026-27. The fund will run until 2029.

Putting heads together

Explaining a desire to build partnerships, the inclusive mainstream fund guidance says: “FE institutions already draw on a range of expertise to support learners with SEND, you may wish to further strengthen this by building on existing partnerships with specialist colleges.”

It adds that specialist providers could help develop alternative approaches to inclusion in areas where colleges have failed in the past.

Other tips include recruiting additional staff to learning support teams, strengthening data collection systems, and setting up informal information evenings for parents and carers of SEND learners.

Providers receiving inclusive mainstream fund cash will be required to set out how they use the money in their annual accountability statements. They also must explain how they respond to SEND and local skills needs. Furthermore, Ofsted will check how the funding is improving outcomes for learners during inspections.

The DfE also recommended using the inclusive mainstream fund for accessible campus maps, sensory tools in classrooms and assistive technology.

It highlighted Stoke-on-Trent College, which set up bespoke timetables, sensory-aware environments and real-world embedded curriculums for learners.

“This initiative is scalable, sustainable and sector-leading, offering a replicable model of inclusive excellence that transforms lives and communities,” the DfE said.

David Holloway, senior policy manager for SEND at the Association of Colleges, said the fund was a “welcome” way to level the playing field for the majority of students with SEND who do not receive any high-needs funding.

“Colleges are highly inclusive in both their enrolment and the way they support students,” he added. “But inclusiveness is fragile in the face of the many financial pressures colleges face.”

Clare Howard, chief executive of Natspec, agreed that the partnership idea would achieve “greater inclusiveness” but warned DfE that its push for mainstream inclusion should not overlook specialist provision.

“Young people in specialist colleges frequently say that specialist provision has given them a sense of belonging, of being valued and understood, and of being supported and challenged to achieve their goal – in other words, of being included,” she said.

Howard added: “This guidance will support FE colleges to build on the highly inclusive practice that already exists, but focussing solely on mainstream risks letting down children and young people with a higher level of need and the specialist providers who serve them.”

The DfE’s guidance said grants should be used at a cohort and whole-institution level, rather than as a personal budget for individual students.

“It is for 16-to-19 settings to decide how to allocate their total funding allocation, after assessing the needs of their overall cohort and the evidence-based activities and approaches that will be effective in their context,” it added.

Officials also clarified that 16-to-19 providers can carry some of their 2026-27 allocation beyond March 31, 2027, provided it is used alongside core funding to strengthen their inclusive offer.

Estates cash ‘for FE too’

The government also rolled out its non-statutory inclusion estates strategy setting out expectations on making school and college estates more inclusive.

It makes clear that high-needs provision capital allocation, an £860 million pot for local authorities to distribute, can be used to adapt college classrooms to make them more inclusive, such as fitting height-adjustable benches or creating wellbeing gardens.

Local authorities have been able to direct capital funding to FE colleges since the fund launched in 2021. They are now required to specify in local SEND reform plans how their capital strategy will cover the full newborn-to-25 age range.

Holloway said: “It is welcome to see the inclusive estates guidance make the point that high-needs provision capital allocations can be spent in colleges as well as schools.”

‘Bradford’s proper sexy’: The honey badger who transformed a college

“Bradford’s proper sexy”, says Bradford College CEO Chris Webb. “Everyone wants to come to Bradford. But when I first arrived here in 2019, no one did.”

In a city with one of the highest rates of universal credit claims in the country, the college has drawn visits from both Charlie Mayfield and Alan Milburn while researching their respective reports on getting more people into work.

But the city is also basking in the afterglow of its year as UK City of Culture 2025, and the college is cultivating a reputation of its own for innovation and creative thinking.

Webb and vice principal of recruitment and communications Sarah Towan show me around the David Hockney building, the biggest of its ten campuses. Opened in 2014, its £50 million price tag ultimately contributed to one of the largest financial rescue packages in FE history, the effects of which the college is still working through today.

The building was named after the famous Bradfordian artist and former college student who, like Webb, was never afraid to court controversy.

“Shall I go down the slide?” he grins at Towan while posing for a photograph in the mock forest school used by early years T Level students.

Bradford College CEO Chris Webb in the college’s mock forest school playground

He may be a CEO, but Webb is still at heart a mischievous boy from Romford, and his cheeky wisecracks occasionally draw exasperated looks from colleagues.

But Webb’s tomfoolery masks his sharp intellect and fierce determination to widen his learners’ horizons.

While some colleges have therapy dogs, Bradford has an emotional support honey badger – a cuddly toy chosen because the animal is “fairly cantankerous”, Webb explains, and “isn’t frightened of anything. It’ll have a go at lions.”

The honey badger in Webb comes out when our conversation turns to funding.

Webb took charge in March 2019, inheriting a college that had already spent more than two years in government intervention and was rated ‘requires improvement’ by Ofsted. On his second day in the job, he signed off on a £45 million rescue package with the Department for Education.

Although around £20 million was later written off, he still bristles at the suggestion that Bradford was ‘bailed out’.

The college, he points out, had originally been refused capital grant funding by the Learning and Skills Council, so had to borrow to build the Hockney building.

“There’s a little bit of the honey badger in me that asks, did DfE really bail us out? Or did we simply get the money we should have had in the first place to keep educating some of the country’s most deprived young people?”

Bradford’s Chris Webb with its honey badger mascot

Bursting at the seams

Bradford emerged from government intervention in 2022 and from bank intervention three years later. But with £12 million to £14 million still owed to the bank, even today the college has to provide regular financial updates to both its lender and the DfE.

Bradford’s latest accounts, due in January, have yet to emerge, pending a decision from the DfE on “anomalies” found during an internal audit, says Webb.

But he stresses this issue “doesn’t place the college in any financial risk” and its financial health forecast is ‘good’.

The irony is that Bradford’s earlier troubles arose partly from recruiting too few learners to service its debt. Its biggest problem now is over-demand.

The college’s 16-18 cohort is expected to total 5,000 next year, roughly double the number when Webb arrived. Hundreds more entry-level, level 1 and level 2 learners have enrolled since Aspire-igen and Qube Learning, two large providers with city bases, collapsed in 2023.

That “completely changed the demographic of our college”, says Webb. Only one in four applicants can now secure a place on its construction courses.

Meanwhile, Towan says there is an “over-sufficiency” of level 3 provision in a city where schools are grappling with poor attendance and high exclusion rates.

Plans for New College Keighley were scrapped, while the Brit School North, once scheduled to open this year, has yet to break ground.

“The system feeding into post-16 is broken,” she says. “The Brit School will be lovely for people from Manchester to Leeds who want to do a level 3 course, but it’s not going to help Bradford.”

Inside Bradford’s David Hockney building

Webb says he has warned the DfE for five years about rising demand for lower-level courses, but the college has no further capital projects planned as the local 16-to-19 population continues growing towards 2030.

“Why do I feel I’m just left on my own trying to fix a problem that seems to be quite systemic? It’s not like they don’t have all the information.”

Sixth forms and universities can respond to overcrowding by raising entry requirements, he says. Colleges instead always try to “squeeze them in somewhere”.

“We’re the place where everyone comes because no one else wants them.”

Demand for T Levels is also rising. Applications have doubled this year, with about 30 per cent coming from internal progression at level 2. Engineering is the most popular, while adult nursing attracted 80 applications for 20 places.

Webb sees that as evidence more young people are choosing vocational routes over academic pathways to university. He worries, however, that those who stop short of higher education may later encounter a “glass ceiling” when a degree becomes necessary for promotion.

Bradford College’s David Hockney building

Beyond Bradford

Night-school A Levels and a degree in sport science and IT “made all the difference” to Webb’s own career.

Before entering FE as a sports teacher, he stacked supermarket shelves, installed loft insulation and worked in a betting shop. He later held senior roles at Newcastle, South Thames and Barnsley colleges before coming to Bradford.

But his life chances as a young man were nonetheless impeded, he believes, by his own lack of cultural capital.

Webb once turned down a trainee underwriter role in the marine division of Lloyd’s of London because he did not understand the job and could not afford the train fare from Romford into central London.

“I could have been a millionaire, sitting on a yacht in Monaco,” he jokes. “I didn’t have the social or the cultural capital to understand. They’re the barriers you face that aren’t about the qualifications.”

But then, he also dismisses money as the “root of all evil”; his staff, he says, were “very happy” to see he was on the second page of FE Week’s list of the highest paid CEOs, rather than the first.

Webb is determined to provide opportunities for his students to build up their own cultural capital. The college prioritises trips overseas, because “you can’t aspire or dream to do stuff if you’ve never seen it”.

Bradford College students’ view of the Artemis II rocket launch

Students have this year travelled to Nepal, Cambodia and Albania. In America, a group saw the Artemis II rocket launch and sat in Apollo’s control room.

Only 10 to 15 per cent travel abroad, but shorter journeys can be just as revealing. Curriculum manager Gary Bradwell recalls public services students “staring at sheep and livestock” during a visit to the Yorkshire Dales because it was “all very new to them”.

Nearby, head of science Andrew Ridley-Ellis stands among backpacks, preparing to take 30 students on one of the college’s six annual camping trips.

“I want every one of our youngsters here to experience what you would get if you’re in a leafy middle-class suburb – that’s what drives us,” he says.

Turing scheme funding has been cut this year and frozen next year, but Towan says Bradford will keep the trips going “any which way we can”.

Bradford students on their trip to the US

Communities united

Enrichment activities within the college are another key focus for Bradford. In the students’ union are engagement team Mohammed Nawaz (Naz) and Mohammed Azeem, who run workshops about online misinformation and helping people understand tensions in the city the college serves.

Azeem has worked for the college for 18 years and is a community youth worker, which means he often already knows the college’s young people before they arrive. One of his family members was involved in the 2001 Bradford riots, which were sparked by anger following a city centre march by far-right activists.

Reform UK is now the largest party on Bradford Council and dominant on almost all of West Yorkshire’s other councils, and recent protests against immigrants elsewhere in the country have prompted concern among the area’s migrant communities.

With most of the executive team commuting from outside Bradford, Azeem recently briefed them on the riots and the risks of renewed division. He nevertheless believes the city has learned from its past.

If far-right groups return, he says, “the people of Bradford, including the college community, would come together and say, ‘this is what Bradford really means to us’”.

Bradford student engagement team Mohammed Nawaz and Mohammed Azeem

No one left behind

Bradford College is also trying to ensure its learners are not left behind by technology. It hosts the annual Innovate North conference and is developing AI tools to support lesson planning and provide digital learning companions.

Webb cannot resist another swipe at Whitehall, saying: “The greatest opportunity for AI will be the ability to take the stupid people who make policy out of the loop.”

Yet the city’s labour market exposes the limits of policy ambition. Digital T Levels have struggled to secure placements because Bradford has few software companies. Remote placements are now permitted, but Towan questions whether learners with social, emotional and mental health needs have the “resilience and focus” to work alone from a bedroom for 45 days.

Bradford has therefore funded an on-campus hub that recreates an office environment for them to work in.

Towan fears the shortage of good local jobs will leave colleges in places such as Bradford disadvantaged if Alan Milburn’s proposal to judge them more heavily on learner outcomes is adopted. The college is increasingly preparing students to seek opportunities in Leeds and Manchester, with a proposed tram link potentially making that easier.

Webb is equally sceptical about incoming V Levels, which he believes will resemble the old AVCE (Advanced Vocational Certificate of Education) vocational A Levels introduced in 2000 and phased out seven years later. He suspects V Levels are partly designed for “middle-tier sixth forms” affected by the removal of BTECs, but says those institutions will struggle to replicate colleges’ practical environments, adding: “Infrastructure is expensive.”

Bradford College’s Sarah Towan Gary Bradwell Chris Webb and Jake Painter

Bradford has received substantial government capital investment for T Levels. Its £1.5 million early years facility includes the mock forest school and a nursery classroom where students can take turns role-playing children in workplace scenarios.

Webb suggests other college chief executives could be invited to play the children.

“The trouble is, they’ll be really poorly behaved,” he says.

But beneath Webb’s jokes is a college transformed. When FE Week last visited, Webb had been in post for barely a year and wanted Bradford to become “one of the best colleges in the country”. Seven years on, that ambition looks much closer to being realised – although success has brought a capacity crisis of its own.

Webb is now eyeing retirement. He jokes, or appears to, that he wants to “go out on a scandal” before retraining as a stand-up comedian.

“Can I throw a McDonald’s milkshake over anyone?” he asks his ever-patient colleagues.

London calling: Capital to host WorldSkills UK national finals in 2027

The boss of Worldskills UK is seeking more competitors from independent training providers for the national finals in London next year.

Chief executive Ben Blackledge used this week’s Association of Employment and Learning Providers conference to confirm the annual national skills competition would return to the capital after four years in south Wales and Greater Manchester.

And he revealed his view that college students are over-represented in skills competitions, and called for ITPs to “get involved”.

The last London FE provider to host a UK national final was Barking & Dagenham College in 2022.

The host venues for 2027 will be announced in autumn and work in partnership with the Greater London Authority.

Last year, more than two dozen national finalists hailed from London’s FE colleges and secured two medals.

WorldSkills UK presents gold, silver and bronze medals to competitors who excel in professional skills at their national finals. Top-performing competitors are then in with a shot of being selected for specialist training and coaching to represent the UK internationally at EuroSkills and WorldSkills.

Blackledge, who leaves Worldskills UK in October to become chief executive of the City & Guilds Foundation, was joined on stage at the AELP conference by four Team UK competitors who will compete at the global WorldSkills competition in Shanghai in September.

Asked what the training provider sector could do to support the UK’s competitive performance on the world stage, he said: “Registrations for the next cycle [of competitions] open in March and they will be hosted in London in 2027-28.

“If you’d like to get a sense of them, come to Wales in November this year. Loads of educators will be there, loads of team leaders will be there. It’s a great chance to learn.”

Colleges ‘over-represented’

For the next cycle of national and international competitions, Blackledge said he wanted to see more entries from a wider range of providers.

“You’ll have heard from two competitors here who trained at a college. We are making real progress in having a full range of sectors represented, but we still have an over-representation of colleges,” he explained.

“I know there is such quality in absolute numbers within the independent training provider networks, so I guess my plea is – get involved in this.”

WorldSkills UK is expected to announce the competitors for the 2026 national finals next month.

And as well as preparing for Shanghai, WorldSkills UK is already laying the groundwork for the EuroSkills 2027 in Düsseldorf, and WorldSkills 2028 in Aichi, Japan.

Left to right: bricklayer Joseph Shingler, restaurant services Yuliia Batrak and renewable energy Madeleine Warburton

Knuckling down for Shanghai

The four champions from Team UK selected for Shanghai discussed their experience of preparing to compete on the world stage.

Team UK’s 26 competitors have three months of intense training left before they join 1,500 other young people from across the globe.

Yuliia Batrak, restaurant service competitor and Medallions for Excellence winner at last year’s EuroSkills Herning, told delegates she was practising breathing techniques to cope with the unpredictability of her skill.

“You don’t know what customers you’re going to get, you don’t know what tasks you’re doing to get on the day and you just need to think very quickly to deliver a five-star service,” she said.

“I’m really looking for the gold medal. I’ve been working for it for the last three and a half years.”

Joseph Shingler, a bricklaying competitor from Shrewsbury College, said he used ear defenders to zone out background noise when competing in front of a crowd.

“The national final taught me that no matter what, I can just go and give it go. My attitude has been to have fun, give it 100 per cent and see what comes out of it,” he added.

WorldSkills Shanghai is on from September 22 and 27.

Movement is helping my traumatised ESOL students to engage

Sometimes looking around an FE ESOL class can feel demotivating, when you’re greeted by blank faces, drooping eyelids and surreptitious tapping on phones under the table. As ESOL teachers, we carefully plan our lessons and it is disheartening to see students not focused and engaged.

Many of our students arrive in our classes desperate to learn English so they can build a better life in this country. Sometimes it can feel frustratingly difficult for teachers to find ways to fulfil that goal.

Perhaps we need to look closer at the reasons students are unable to concentrate.

Many have experienced war, poverty, trafficking, or other traumatic events over several years. Recently, I had a student from Sudan who was constantly taking bathroom breaks, falling asleep in class and failing to make any progress in his English skills. After a one-to-one tutorial, it became clear that he was carrying an avalanche of unprocessed trauma from a war-torn childhood. Along with navigating the UK visa system and temporary accommodation, he was struggling to take in any more of life, let alone my lesson on the present perfect continuous.

I started to investigate how trauma affects learning, which led me to the work of Bessel van der Kolk. In The Body Keeps the Score, van der Kolk argues that trauma is not only stored as memories or thoughts, but also in the body. When an individual remains in a constant state of threat over time, the part of the brain that affects concentration, memory, and emotional regulation can be severely affected. Therefore, traumatised students might find it hard to focus or remember information, and their emotions can be unpredictable.

Thankfully for ESOL teachers, students’ behavioural challenges are often signs of stress, not a reflection of bad teaching.

Van der Kolk discusses different practices to ease the effects of trauma, one being yoga. Kolk maintains that yoga helps to reconnect traumatised people with their body and brings them back into the present. It helps to regulate breathing and calms the nervous system. In traumatised individuals, it can encourage self-awareness and mindfulness, a pause that allows a sense of safety in the present, instead of dwelling in past danger.

So how can we work with yoga in the classroom? Should teachers be wearing Lycra and burning incense?

Well, research would suggest that even small moments of movement can help students calm their nervous systems, focus, and feel safe enough to participate in learning. Some simple activities which include movement, such as ‘find someone who’, where students move around the classroom talking to classmates to make a survey, can activate a sense of physical awareness.

Running dictations can not only reinforce reading, writing and speaking skills but also get the heart pumping and bring a sense of ‘now’ to the classroom. Stretching, reaching for the sky, and swaying to the left and right eases tension in the shoulders.  Rubbing hands together until they get really hot gets students ready for writing. Balancing on one foot helps foster focus and awareness of surroundings before heavy grammar lessons. Simple box breathing exercise – breathe in for 4 hold for 4, out for 4 hold for 4 – can reset focus and reduce stress before assessments. Asking students to give themselves a hug always brings smiles to their faces. Encourage stamping of feet if there’s no one under your classroom!

All these activities are particularly useful before assessments, speaking activities or presentations. Over time, they can help students self-regulate and raise confidence in themselves.

This year, I have incorporated more movement in my classroom.  At the start of the class, I open the windows and we run through our exercises. The students now anticipate movement throughout the lesson. There’s nothing quite like seeing a row of glum faces dissolve in giggles as they watch classmates try to stand on one foot. And my Sudanese student? I’m happy to say that after a year, he has progressed to the next class.

Successful language learning needs risk-taking, concentration and self-belief.

Students are far more likely to learn when they are mentally and physically in the classroom with you. Movement encourages a link to the present while also giving students a chance to communicate and learn. In ESOL classes, movement is not a distraction from learning – it can be what makes learning possible.