Skip to content
5 November 2026

Latest news from FE Week

Innovate Awarding fined £185k after centre certificated learners in 24 hours

An awarding body that failed to investigate suspected malpractice at a training provider until it registered and certified more than 100 learners in less than 24 hours has been fined £185,000 by Ofqual.

Innovate Awarding has now revoked almost all of the 851 level 3 business administration certificates issued to learners at one of its centres between 2023 and 2024, following a probe by the qualifications regulator.

Ofqual said Innovate failed to carry out adequate approval checks, monitoring or investigations, and did not review certificates already issued despite evidence the centre had been registering and certificating learners improperly for “many months”.

FE Week understands the centre, which Ofqual names only as ‘centre A’ in its notice of fine today, is EPIC Graduate School Ltd, based in east London. The company has not responded to requests for comment.

Innovate first raised concerns about the centre on 18 January 2024, after 130 learners were registered and certificated within a day, and removed its direct claim status. The qualification has 580 hours of total qualification time.

Innovate later sanctioned the centre, ended its relationship with it and closed its investigation, after the centre said on 31 July 2024 that 108 learners awaiting certification had been withdrawn.

But that investigation looked only at the 108 learners and did not consider the 851 already certificated through the centre, Ofqual said.

Innovate only widened its inquiry to those learners after discussions with Ofqual in February 2025. It completed the revocation of 847 of the 851 certificates, which Ofqual said were “wrongly awarded”, in August 2026, more than two years after concerns first emerged.

Innovate will also pay £15,000 of Ofqual’s costs on top of the £185,000 fine.

EPIC Graduate School, based in Forest Gate, east London, is a training provider set up in 2021. According to the company’s website, it offers privately funded courses in business administration and emergency first aid at work, alongside testing for door supervision and CCTV operatives.

‘Reckless rather than merely negligent’

According to the penalty notice, issued today following a final decision by Ofqual’s enforcement panel on 2 October, Innovate Awarding missed “numerous opportunities” to prevent the centre’s malpractice and showed a “reckless” disregard of its own controls for preventing potential qualification fraud.

But by the time a wider inquiry was launched in March 2025, after Ofqual flagged concerns about the initial investigation, learner records and contact information were “unavailable” and the opportunity to gather evidence “had largely been lost”.

In its comments on aggravating features of the case, the exam regulator said Innovate Awarding could “easily” have avoided the breaches by taking basic steps before approving the centre, when monitoring it, and after indications of malpractice came to light.

It added: “There were widespread system and controls issues, and a disregard of established processes and policies which appeared reckless rather than merely negligent.

“Although there were flaws with [Innovate Awarding’s] policies at the time, it appears likely that adverse effects would have been avoided had it followed those polices.”

‘Large scale’ impact

Innovate Awarding’s failures to identify malpractice also had a “large scale” impact due to more than 800 certificates which can be used as evidence of English language competence remaining valid for a “prolonged period” before being revoked.

Ofqual said the awarding business breached several of its own policies, including awarding the centre direct claims status, which allowed the centre to claim certificates without external quality assurance approval, after only 30 working days and samples of four learner portfolios.

Innovate’s own policies required at least 12 months of monitoring before awarding this status, and a review of ten learner portfolios.

The centre’s approval was also given “without adequate independent verification” of evidence, which included external quality assurance reports that contained “clear anomalies”, and limited assessment of risk indicators such as “links to sanctioned centres, phoenix organisations or connected businesses.

Innovate Awarding failed to recognise or escalate “significant warning signs” including an April 2024 external quality assurance report that identified learner evidence that appeared to be “several years old”, was “lacking authenticity”, used incorrect names, and “redacted” documents, Ofqual said.

The centre exceeded its annual learner registration forecast of at most 250 within about four months and “frequently” registered and certificated within one or two days, despite the business administration qualification requiring 580 hours.

Ofqual said Innovate Awarding did not routinely monitor its registration data and only escalated concerns about the centre when “exceptionally high” learner volumes appeared in January 2024.

‘No concerns’

During the investigation, Innovate said it had “no concerns” about the centre because it “responded promptly to requests and made payments on time”, according to the notice.

Ofqual also found “weak data management, record keeping and oversight”, including a lack of accurate and auditable records.

Amanda Swann, Executive Director for Delivery at Ofqual, said: “The value of qualifications depends on public confidence that they are awarded fairly and earned legitimately.

“Innovate Awarding failed to respond effectively to serious concerns raised about qualifications delivered through one of its centres. Weak controls increased the risk of qualification fraud and allowed certificates to remain in place despite doubts about whether some learners had genuinely met the qualification’s requirements.

“These are significant failings that undermine trust in qualifications and warrant a substantial financial penalty.”

Rob May, managing director of Innovate Awarding, said the company acknowledges Ofqual’s notice about “historical compliance matters from 2024”.

He added: “When concerns were raised, Innovate took action to investigate the matter, reported it to Ofqual and cooperated fully throughout the regulatory process. We are no longer working with the training provider concerned.

“Since the issues were identified, we have implemented a range of enhancements to our compliance, governance and quality assurance processes to strengthen oversight across the organisation.

“Our priority remains delivering high-quality services and maintaining the confidence of our learners, customers and stakeholders. We are committed to continuous improvement and meeting the standards expected by the regulator.”

Colleges, don’t wait for all the answers on qualification reform

One year on from the skills white paper, the question for colleges is shifting from what new qualifications will look like to how we make them work for learners.

With V Levels, Foundation and Occupational Certificates and further T Level growth planned from September 2027, colleges cannot wait for every detail before preparing.

At Newcastle and Stafford Colleges Group (NSCG), we’re testing the implications for learners and delivery. As a DfE qualification pioneer, we’re contributing to reform development, identifying gaps and highlighting support needs.

Start with learners, not qualifications

I recently shared our lessons with nearly 1,000 colleagues at a DfE webinar. My message was simple: don’t start by asking what replaces the BTEC. Ask what your learners need.

At NSCG, we support around 11,500 learners across three campuses, including 7,500 aged 16–18. We’ve mapped level 2 and level 3 provision against reform and defunding timelines, distinguishing confirmed changes from those awaiting clarification, alongside data on starting points, English and maths, barriers and progression.

At level 2, over 70 per cent of our learners need further English or maths study, while around 60 per cent progress to level 3 vocational programmes.

At level 3, vocational learners average 4.2 GCSE points on entry, compared with 4.9 for T Levels and 6.4 for A Levels. Across our learners, 69 per cent have an identified barrier to learning. These differences matter. Learners on substantial vocational programmes won’t necessarily fit new pathways without appropriate support.

We’re modelling how V Levels, A Levels, T Levels, remaining alternative academic qualifications and new level 2 routes might work together, particularly for learners not yet ready for T Levels, those benefiting from broader vocational study or whose ambitions change.

How do we maintain flexible pathways into further study, apprenticeships, employment or higher education? A 16-year-old’s aspirations can change. Our planning must allow for that.

What growing T Levels has taught us

We’ve delivered T Levels since the early stages, growing from 24 learners to around 825. What works for 24 doesn’t necessarily work for 825!

Growth requires employer capacity, specialist staff, facilities and learner support. For example, before increasing health numbers, we check NHS placement capacity and identify gaps before enrolment.

We’ve restructured our employer partnerships team: employer partnership officers secure opportunities and build relationships, while learner industry placement officers prepare, match and support learners.

Flexible placements, including block weeks with the Ministry of Defence for engineering learners and weekly placements with digital employers, respond to operational needs while maintaining accessibility for learners with different circumstances.

We’re looking beyond placement hours, using employer relationships to build confidence, develop employability skills and create progression into apprenticeships and employment.

Successful growth depends on the infrastructure around qualifications, not simply the qualifications themselves. We’re applying this lesson to wider reform.

Five things college leaders can do now

I’d recommend five practical actions.

First, make reform a whole-college priority, with leadership, governor oversight and joined-up planning across curriculum, finance, workforce, estates, careers and learner support.

Second, map provision against learner data to identify starting points, barriers, progression routes and gaps

Third, plan whole study programmes, not just replacement qualifications. Test A Level, V Level and other pathways against staffing, timetabling, assessment, support and progression.

Fourth, prioritise delivery risks. We’re using readiness assessments, RAG ratings and protected planning days to test scenarios, identify capacity challenges and agree actions.

Finally, engage beyond the college doors. The September 2027 cohort is already in school. Learners, parents, teachers, employers and progression partners need to understand their options.

Plan with what we know, remaining flexible as guidance develops.

Preparing together for what comes next

Implementation requires collaboration between government, providers, awarding organisations, employers and progression partners. Timely clarity on specifications, assessment, funding and transition arrangements, alongside workforce and employer support, will help colleges plan.

Providers start from different positions. NSCG’s breadth of A Level, vocational, T Level and apprenticeship provision gives us flexibility others may not have.

Through our qualification pioneer role and the West Midlands Technical and Vocational Education Hub, we’re testing approaches, sharing learning and supporting sector readiness.

My message is simple: don’t wait for the perfect plan. Start with your learners and test what delivery will involve.

Ultimately, success shouldn’t be measured by qualifications introduced, but by whether young people can access suitable programmes, overcome barriers and progress into further study, apprenticeships, employment and higher education.

That’s the real test of reform, and it’s the one we should be preparing for.

£120k boost for post-16 pupil premium campaign

Campaigners calling for the pupil premium to be extended to disadvantaged 16 to 19-year-olds have secured £120,000 for research to strengthen their case.

Tutoring charity Get Further won the grant from the Santander UK Foundation to investigate the funding gap facing disadvantaged learners and bolster their calls for a post-16 student premium.

Learning and Work Institute will look into what happens to disadvantaged learners after pupil premium funding ends at age 16. Public First will use that evidence to build an economic case to the government for targeted per-student funding.

Get Further has convened the Student Premium Coalition, whose 20 members include the Association of Colleges, Association of Employment and Learning Providers, the Sixth Form Colleges Association and the Association of School and College Leaders.

It wants ministers to introduce an estimated £430 million a year from academic year 2027-28 for colleges, sixth forms and training providers, matching the projected secondary-school pupil premium rate of £1,122 per eligible learner.

Eligibility would be based on whether a learner currently receives, or has previously qualified for, free school meals.

The funding could pay for extra English and math tuition, mentoring or student support initiatives to improve attendance and progression on top of existing disadvantage funding.

Santander UK Foundation, established in 1990, has recently relaunched with a new strategy focused on disadvantaged 16 to 19 year olds in further education. Its priorities include attainment, enrichment and transition into and out of FE.

Years of calls

The pupil premium was introduced by the coalition government in 2011 to improve attainment for disadvantaged pupils. Over the years there have been numerous calls for successive governments to extend the premium, which currently stops at 16.

Those calls have been consistently rejected, with ministers arguing that disadvantage funding is provided through the 16 to 19 funding formula.

In July 2024, the Education Policy Institute estimated that funding targeted at disadvantaged young people was nearly £1000 lower per learner in post-16 education than in secondary schools.

The following year, September 2025, parliament’s education committee urged ministers to introduce a student premium.

The government declined the committee’s recommendation, arguing the funding formula already provided support for disadvantaged learners and those with low prior attainment.

It cited £776 million in disadvantage funding allocated for 2025-26, alongside £245 million for English and maths and around £195 million in bursaries.

In a written parliamentary answer in April, children and families minister Josh MacAlister pointed to an expected 10.5 per cent rise in average post-16 funding per learner between 2024-25 and 2026-27.

The coalition argues these arrangements still leave no direct equivalent to the school pupil premium.

‘Clear-cut case’

Alice Eardley, Get Further’s interim chief executive, said: “The strongest predictor of long-term NEET status is leaving education without good qualifications, yet targeted support for underserved young people falls away at precisely the point when gaining those qualifications matters most for their future prospects.”

Headshot of Get Further interim CEO Alice Eardley
Alice Eardley

She said the research would give ministers a “clear-cut case” for extending support beyond 16.

Eardley is also a trustee of Santander UK Foundation, having joined its board in February 2026 before becoming interim CEO of Get Further. She said she was kept removed from the process of awarding the grant.

The first research report is expected later this autumn.

Stephen Evans, chief executive of Learning and Work Institute, said: “We know that the 16 to 19 education phase shapes so much of what comes next, but a large attainment gap between young people based on their background represents a waste of potential for both them and the economy.

“We are delighted to be supporting the coalition with research to help change that and give policymakers and practitioners a clearer picture of where to act.”

FE Week is a member of the Student Premium Coalition.

Job cuts loom as PeopleCert integrates four City & Guilds training providers

More jobs are at risk across City & Guilds after new owner PeopleCert announced plans to integrate its four training providers under a single division.

Gen2, Intertrain, TradeSkills4U and The Oxford Group will be brought together under PeopleLearn, a new division that will seek to reduce duplication through a “more integrated operating model”.

More than 350 people work across the four businesses, but PeopleCert has refused to say how many roles could be lost.

The providers have been owned by PeopleCert since it acquired City & Guilds’ awarding body business in October 2025. It remains unclear whether they will be merged into a single company or continue operating under their existing brands.

FE Week understands staff were told on 15 October that “some roles” may be affected by the proposed changes. Management cited the loss of skills bootcamp revenue and difficult trading conditions as factors behind the restructuring.

Interim CEO Andy Moss said the businesses had suffered a 22 per cent fall in revenue in the nine months to September compared with the same period last year, alongside “significant combined operating losses”.

Moss also told staff that PeopleLearn would pursue opportunities for growth through new products, technology investment and, over time, “targeted acquisitions”.

It comes as hundreds of staff at City & Guilds formally ballot for strike action over plans to require them to work from the office at least two days per week. They follow a separate redundancy round earlier this year, when 75 roles were put at risk, prompting threats of legal and industrial action from the union. A total of 64 redundancies were ultimately made.

In a presentation to investors that was leaked last year, PeopleCert said it hoped to cut £19 million from its staff costs by 2027 through “personnel cost synergies”.

‘No final decisions have been made’

Confirming the PeopleLearn division, a PeopleCert spokesperson said: “We are bringing together Gen2, Intertrain, TradeSkills4U and The Oxford Group under PeopleLearn, a new division with the ambition of becoming a leading provider of workforce development and professional learning in the UK.

“This represents an important opportunity to combine the strengths of our training businesses as part of a coordinated programme of investment and transformation across PeopleCert and City & Guilds. Alongside significant investment in our assessment and qualifications business, we are investing in technology, innovation and operational capability to strengthen services for learners and employers, and create a stronger platform for sustainable, long-term growth.”

They added: “As part of establishing PeopleLearn, we are proposing a more integrated operating model, including the consolidation of some functions and the streamlining of operations across the businesses. These proposals respond to challenging trading conditions and are intended to create a more sustainable foundation for future investment and growth.

“Some roles may be affected by the proposed changes. No final decisions have been made, and we are committed to consulting openly and respectfully with colleagues before any decisions are reached.”

Gen2, based in Cumbria, was bought by City & Guilds in 2017 and had about 1,300 apprentices and a smaller number of adult learners during its most recent Ofsted inspection in 2024.

In 2025, it had a £13 million turnover and made a £1.2 million profit, following losses of £1.8 million and £1.9 million in the two previous years.

A PeopleCert spokesperson said: “Gen2 will remain an important part of the new division, continuing to support employers and learners across Cumbria and the wider region.

“We recognise the vital role Gen2 plays in developing the specialist technical skills needed by UK industry, particularly the nuclear sector, and remain committed to supporting these capabilities.”

City & Guilds bought railway skills training provider Intertrain in 2019 for an undisclosed sum. The company had about 429 learners when it was Ofsted inspected in March this year and made a profit of £408,000 on a turnover of £17.7 million.

Two weeks ago, its executive director Alex Pond confirmed he will leave the business in January “to pursue a new direction”.

TradeSkills4U, which specialises in electrical apprenticeships and privately funded courses, made a loss of £1 million in 2024 and £400,000 in the previous year. City & Guilds bought it from private equity firm Palatine in 2022.

The Oxford Group has been part of City & Guilds since 2015 and delivers unregulated leadership and management training.

It declared a £1.2 million profit on an annual turnover of £9 million in 2024-25, down from £1.5 million the previous year.

South Devon College principal Laurence Frewin to retire in 2027

Laurence Frewin will retire as principal of South Devon College at the end of the 2026-27 academic year, following 17 years at the college and eight years leading it.

It was announced today that Frewin will remain in post until summer 2027, with the college’s board of governors now preparing to appoint his successor.

He joined the college in February 2010 as vice principal for corporate services, becoming deputy CEO in 2015 before taking over as principal and CEO in September 2019.

Announcing his retirement, Frewin said personal and family changes over the past year had prompted him to reflect on his priorities for the years ahead.

“This has been an incredibly difficult decision for me,” he said. “The past year has brought some significant changes for my family, alongside some happier milestones, and these have caused me to reflect carefully on my priorities for the years ahead.”

Frewin said he remained committed to leading the college through his final academic year.

“Although I have announced my retirement, I am definitely not winding down. We still have an important year ahead and much that we want to achieve together. I remain completely committed to leading the college with the same energy, passion and determination until my last day in post.”

He added that it has been the “greatest privilege” to serve as the leader of South Devon College.

Martin Foulger, chair of the board of governors, said Frewin’s “passion” for South Devon College and its communities “is evident to everyone who knows him”.

“He is a highly respected and valued leader, and his commitment to the college, its students and its staff has been unwavering,” Foulger said.

He added: “While we are naturally saddened by his decision, we fully understand the personal reasons behind it. We are grateful that Laurence will continue with the same energy to lead the college throughout the academic year and will work with the board to support a smooth transition.

“The board will now begin the process of appointing Laurence’s successor.”

South Devon College teaches thousands of students across Torbay and South Devon and employs more than 600 staff.

It was judged ‘good’ by Ofsted in 2024. The college is currently in financial intervention but leaders plan to exit intervention by no later than July 2027, according to its latest set of accounts.

Defining antisemitism won’t silence debate on Israel

We need to be plain about what antisemitism is.

Sir David Bell’s review into antisemitism in schools and colleges spotlights the scale of the problem we face. 51% of Jewish teachers surveyed experienced antisemitism in school in the past year. One in five 16-19 year olds surveyed witnessed or experienced antisemitism, the number rising to three in five for Jewish students. 40% of school teachers surveyed who teach about the Holocaust reported encountering antisemitism in these lessons.

Fixing this requires action on a range of fronts. But it starts with defining antisemitism clearly, in a usable way. That is why the government is expecting schools and colleges to adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) working definition of antisemitism. The working definition must be adopted in a way that means that schools and colleges can meet their legal duties, including on equality and free speech.

This is the first of the 27 recommendations from Sir David’s review. We have accepted his review in its entirety, and we will start to implement it immediately.

Despite the report being published only days ago, I have already seen misleading suggestions that adopting the IHRA definition will prevent discussion of Israel or suppress legitimate political debate. That is simply not true.

The IHRA definition has been adopted by 47 countries, and countless public bodies. The working definition spotlights the insidious and often subtle form that antisemitism can take, and provides a practical framework that helps teachers and pupils spot and tackle it.

It opens up, rather than shuts down, essential conversations. It also explicitly states that criticism of Israel similar to that levelled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic.

The examples included in the definition cover denial of the Holocaust, making stereotypical allegations about the power of Jews as a collective, and questioning the loyalty of Jews to their own nation.

It also includes an example worth defending: “Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavour.” Throughout history, Jewish people have been denied agency stemming from antisemitic ideas that they are an untrustworthy or malicious minority. The founding of the State of Israel, following the Holocaust and endorsed by the UN came following extreme global persecution.

Those who find this example uncomfortable should reflect on how denying a different minority group their right to self-determination would be experienced by that group. Worse still, what are the ideas that would lead one to label this right to self-determination itself as “racist”?

This example in the working definition in no way limits criticism of the State of Israel. The UK government itself has criticised recent action by the Israeli government in Gaza, and it is perfectly possible to do this without denying Jewish people’s right to self-determination. The claim that the IHRA definition makes criticism of Israel impossible is a lazy misrepresentation.

I know that the conversations teachers are navigating in light of political events in the Middle East and with the backdrop of hate spread online are not easy. I was a citizenship teacher myself and I have had to navigate these very same conversations. The definition will give teachers the confidence to protect legitimate political expression and tackle antisemitic behaviour.

Education is the most powerful disinfectant against the disease of antisemitism. Acting on Sir David’s review is a task for all of us. And it starts with being plain about what antisemitism is. Only then can we work together to root it out.

Sharing the story of their lives, from the frontline of FE

Rebecca Gater was already preparing for two of the biggest tests of her professional life when the phone rang.

It was 2022, and Solihull College & University Centre’s vice principal for curriculum and quality had a gruelling two-day interview approaching for the top job. She was also preparing to defend years of doctoral research in her viva examination.

Then came the call from Ofsted. The college was about to undergo its first inspection since merging with Stratford-upon-Avon College four years earlier. Gater was its nominee.

“I had the worst, most stressful two weeks ever,” she recalls. “It was super high pressure.”

Yet she emerged from these three formidable challenges with a clean sweep: the college was rated ‘good’, she passed her doctorate and secured the principal and chief executive position.

A new book that Gater has edited, Inspiring Senior Leadership in Further Education: Stories from the front line, brings together similar personal accounts of how 17 college leaders have overcome adversity to thrive in the top jobs.

The book grew from her frustration that so much leadership literature focused on schools and universities, while few explored the people running colleges.

She also wanted to challenge the perception that there is a particular type of person destined for FE senior leadership.

Former Cornwall College principal John Evans traces his emphasis on customer service to growing up in his family’s corner shop.

Capel Manor College deputy principal Heather Marks previously ran a flower shop, while London South East Colleges principal Asfa Sohail moved from Pakistan to join her husband and entered FE after a lecturer asked her to cover an IT class.

Runshaw College principal Clare Russell writes about being a rebellious teenager who married at 17 and was abandoned by her husband three years later while eight-and-a-half months pregnant – giving her “the empathy required to see the real barriers some students face”.

Gater sees common threads running through these apparently disparate lives.

Most leaders came from working-class backgrounds. Few followed a straightforward career trajectory. None imagined themselves becoming college principals when they were young.

Now leading a three-campus college group, Gater has come a long way from when she was a “directionless” young mother teaching for three hours a week.

Gater and her husband with their eldest daughter, Emily, when she was two years old, 25 years ago

Directionless beginnings

Gater is a Midlander through and through. Her Black Country accent gives away her roots in Stourbridge, where she was born, raised and still lives.

Her journey into education began in a crystal glass showroom, where she worked full-time in retail management while attending evening lectures at the University of Wolverhampton.

She was studying human resource management with Spanish, juggling the demands of work and university while saving to build a future with her boyfriend, now her husband.

A month after graduating, aged 22, she gave birth to the first of their four daughters.

The couple were still living with their parents, “saving every penny to start our new life together”.

But Gater felt “directionless, with a young baby and no clear path forward”.

Then Stourbridge College offered her three hours a week teaching business to sports students.

She was hooked. What appealed was the diversity of FE, its sense of purpose and, above all, its capacity to give people another chance.

Her teaching expanded to include evening language classes for adults. Meanwhile, four daughters arrived within six years.

She felt “always in a rush” to get things done, rushing out of the house as her husband returned from work at 5pm. They shared a car, so if he was late, she was late to teach.

“It was challenging, but it’s made me as a person. It’s made us as a family as well, because we’ve done all that growing together,” she says.

Now a grandmother of two, she attended two daughters’ university graduations the day before our interview. Her other daughters also work in education. She is proud of the example she has set.

“It’s important to me as the mum of girls, that they know if they want to do something, they can do it.”

Gater and her husband (Darren) with their two middle daughters, Liv (left) and Anya (right), at their graduation this summer

The pull of FE

Gater then joined a graduate programme to teach in secondary schools, spending two years at a West Bromwich school in special measures.

She was one of 26 new teachers recruited together and progressed to become a head of year, alongside responsibilities including key stage three IT.

The experience offered a sharp contrast with college teaching. Where FE teacher training had to accommodate subjects ranging from engineering to adult languages, she found the school system much more prescriptive.

“There’s a formula in schools that everyone does the same kind of thing, regardless of the subject or type of school,” she says.

She missed the variety of FE and upon becoming pregnant with her fourth child, the daily demands of getting three other children ready each morning became overwhelming.

Part-time working “wasn’t part of the school’s ethos”, whereas she saw FE as more flexible and family-friendly.

She returned to Stourbridge College as a programme manager in business just as its business and IT departments were merging, and took a sideways move into student services.

Her involvement in student disciplinary cases exposed the difficulties learners were navigating outside college.

“It helped me to understand the workings of the wider college much more so than I’d ever done before.”

She then moved to South Staffordshire College as an assistant head of faculty and, through successive restructures, progressed to managing its Cannock campus and a faculty.

She later joined Solihull as vice principal for curriculum and quality, while also becoming an Ofsted inspector.

That combination has given her a perspective on leadership extending well beyond her own institution.

A photo that is particularly special to Gater, taken during Covid period when restrictions had eased enough for people to socialise in their gardens. Her sister, husband and their two children came to the Gater house for a barbecue, and it felt incredibly significant, having not seen family face-to-face for many months. Looking at the photograph reminds Gater not to take precious family moments for granted

The inspector

Gater’s first assignment as a fully-fledged inspector was a difficult one: inspecting a large London college that was downgraded from ‘good’ to ‘requires improvement’.

She was relieved not to know anybody there, making it easier to remain objective.

Inspecting other colleges has since become an important source of professional development.

She can see how other leaders tackle problems and bring ideas back to Solihull.

But knowing exactly how the inspection process works does not make her any less nervous when inspectors arrive at her own college.

“There’s so much to lose, isn’t there? It feels like such high stakes,” she says.

Despite Ofsted’s insistence that its new inspection framework represents a significant change, Gater sees more continuity than disruption.

She acknowledges “a bit of a fear” across the sector about inclusion becoming a standalone judgment. But inclusion, she argues, has always been central to colleges’ work.

“Our philosophy is that there is a place here for everyone. We don’t turn those students away.”

Gater with her four daughters at a baby shower earlier this month. (Left to right Neve, Emily, Liv, Anya)

Stepping into the unknown

Gater had been Solihull’s vice principal for just two years when principal and chief executive John Callaghan died suddenly in October 2021.

Only weeks earlier, he had offered to mentor Gater with a view to her succeeding him when he eventually retired.

His illness progressed so rapidly that the mentoring never happened.

The loss was deeply felt at Solihull. Gater describes a period of “institutional bereavement”, accompanied by “feelings of a lack of stability”.

She applied to become permanent principal “not because I had all the answers, but because I believed in the college and the people within it”.

I put it to her that the personal qualities celebrated in her book seem a long way from the leaders who once appeared more interested in building empires than nurturing institutions.

“People came from being principals to CEOs, and it was that CEO badge that led to some of those behaviours,” she says.

She believes that culture is changing.

“This generation of leaders have a recognition that to be the best leader you can be, you need to be authentic, relatable and build that trust, and not focus on your own gains.”

But does that authenticity extend beyond the college gates?

Many principals are candid in private about government policy and the difficulties facing their institutions, yet reluctant to speak publicly.

Gater acknowledges that tension.

FE leaders are “very aware of our role in protecting the reputations of our organisations and the sector itself”.

Her own greatest challenge is balancing the two sides of her job.

Being principal means looking after students and staff, an approach she describes as “servant leadership”.

Being chief executive involves politics, positioning the college, building its reputation and anticipating what comes next.

“I’m constantly reflecting on, ‘am I focusing on the internal workings too much at the detriment of the external big position?’.”

Leadership development programmes have helped her find that balance.

She is currently one of 28 participants in the Cabinet Office’s public leaders programme, which brings together senior figures from education, local government, the NHS and emergency services.

It has challenged her to look beyond the traditional boundaries of FE.

“We’re breaking down barriers because we’ve all got the same struggles but we don’t necessarily think about going outside our own sector to be part of wider solutions,” Gater says.

That thinking is particularly relevant to SEND reform.

Solihull has around 500 students with education, health and care plans, issued by 17 different local authorities.

Each has its own procedures and approaches, creating considerable administrative complexity. Gater hopes reform will bring greater consistency.

But she is also thinking about how colleges can collaborate more closely with councils and NHS trusts, rather than simply discussing SEND challenges among themselves.

Two regions, two systems

Solihull College’s geography presents another leadership challenge.

Its Blossomfield and Woodlands campuses sit within the West Midlands Combined Authority, while its Stratford-upon-Avon campus falls within Warwickshire.

Gater must navigate two very different systems of skills devolution. The West Midlands has years of experience exercising devolved powers, while the Reform-led Warwickshire County Council only assumed responsibility for adult skills commissioning this summer.

“We’re helping them on their journey to work out what that looks like and how they should set things up,” Gater says.

Employers in the region had complained they were receiving too many approaches from different education providers, leaving them unsure whom to contact.

Gater helped establish Skills West Midlands and Warwickshire as a collective intended to simplify those relationships and translate regional skills priorities into delivery.

Rebecca Gater in 2022

Combination complications

The introduction of V Levels is already creating practical dilemmas. Gater wants the college to offer them, but their intended combination with other qualifications creates complications.

Solihull currently offers a limited number of A Levels at Blossomfield. To make V Level programmes viable, it may have to introduce A Levels at its other campuses. That would represent a significant departure for two relatively specialist sites.

Woodlands, in north Solihull, concentrates heavily on STEM subjects, and Stratford-upon-Avon has traditionally specialised in creative arts and is increasingly expanding its construction provision.

Meanwhile, the college’s experience of T Levels has been mixed.

Digital, engineering and animal care courses are performing strongly, but health and science remain a “real challenge”.

Gater believes damaging publicity surrounding the early problems with health and science T Levels, including an examination fiasco that led to results being recalculated, has “put parents and students off”.

Industrial placements create another difficulty.

Many Solihull students work part-time to support themselves, and sometimes their families. Finding time for a substantial unpaid placement can be extremely challenging.

There are pressures on the staffing side too, with board minutes last year highlighting a “high number of agency staff”.

Demand for construction courses “continues to go through the roof”, but recruiting lecturers with the necessary trade expertise is difficult. When it comes to construction subjects, Gater says “we don’t have the people to teach the growing number of students, and that’s really difficult. We’re competing with industry who can pay a lot more.”

The college’s 16-18 learner numbers rose by 8 per cent in 2023-24 and 4 per cent in 2024-25, prompting temporary classrooms and plans for additional sites.

Gater says Solihull can afford generous teacher salaries compared with its West Midlands counterparts by keeping staffing structures lean elsewhere and benefiting from economies of scale.

Above all, Gater wants staff to “feel valued, connected and know their contribution matters”.

Her book ends with a prediction: that the next generation of senior FE leaders will “not be forged by perfection but by persistence, not by pedigree but by practice”.

“Your difference is not a deficit; it is your advantage. Use it to inspire, to transform and to serve.”

 

 

 

 

 

Frustration at Skills England’s apprenticeship review slowdown

Just 270 reformed apprenticeship assessment plans (AAPs) have been published, falling well short of Skills England’s August 2026 deadline to review all 700-plus apprenticeship standards.

The government agency admitted it had “adapted the pace of change” after spending the past year pushing the sector to meet what officials acknowledged was an ambitious timetable.

Employers and awarding organisations are understood to be frustrated by a lack of communication from Skills England about the slowdown.

FE Week also understands that Skills England paused full reviews of individual apprenticeships, other than in exceptional cases where there was an urgent need to complete work, address a ministerial priority or respond to priority local needs.

It comes amid a wider review of occupational standards through Skills England’s recently launched “skills for work” programme, raising concerns that apprenticeships awaiting updates to their funding bands and knowledge and skills requirements have been left in limbo.

Finish the job

Reform began last year to replace the end-point assessment model in apprenticeships with new assessment plans that introduce sampling of knowledge and skills, strengthen the role of mandatory qualifications in some standards, and remove the independent assessment of behaviours.

Carmel Grant, Skills England’s deputy director of reform and development, told the Federation of Awarding Bodies (FAB) conference in November that “August is the date by which we’ve been asked to review all the apprenticeship plans in delivery”.

She added: “It is ambitious. It is challenging. We will need to evaluate along the way. Some will go smoothly, and some won’t. We recognise that, but that is the timeline.”

But the deadline passed with just 142 AAPs published and a further 350 in development.

By 22 October, the total published had risen to 270.

In response to the figures, a Skills England spokesperson said: “Skills England is committed to delivering assessment reform so the benefits are realised as early as possible – but we are equally committed to taking the time needed to get this right.

“We have listened to stakeholders’ feedback and adapted the pace of change where appropriate.”

They added that work is progressing on AAPs, and stakeholders would be updated at the “appropriate time”.

Terry Fennell, chief executive of awarding body Food and Drink Qualifications (FDQ), said there had been a “clear sense of collective urgency” around the approvals process, but that progress had “slowed significantly” since August.

He revealed that communication from Skills England, which had been “so proactive earlier in the year”, had “virtually ceased”.

“This is creating uncertainty for FDQ that, like all awarding organisations, are trying to redesign standards and support employers and providers during the transition to apprenticeship assessment 2.0,” he added.

Daniel Green, policy director at FAB, described the original timetable as “ambitious” and called for clearer communication from Skills England, while urging the agency to finish the reviews rather than “leaving the work half-done”.

He told FE Week: “If the pace of progress has eased to allow Skills England to get implementation right, that is a sensible course of action, but this needs to be communicated clearly by Skills England to those involved in delivering the change.

“It’s also important to note that no new apprenticeship assessment has yet been delivered; the challenge now is not designing reform, but delivering it successfully.

“Skills England and other actors must remain firmly on ensuring the changes are landed for the benefit of apprentices and employers rather than leaving the work half-done.  We must avoid the all-too-common temptation to move on before the job is done.”

Employer confidence is critical

The government’s reforms triggered a backlash last year from construction and built environment organisations, which warned that assessment changes risked “dumbing down” apprenticeships and letting unqualified learners pass.

In July, Skills England announced it had agreed to a sector-specific, risk-based approach designed to protect competence in safety-critical jobs following strong employer opposition.

The new methodology uses “risk profiling” to tailor assessment requirements according to the level of occupational risk rather than applying a single model across all construction standards. This approach was extended to all sectors.

Sam Callear, CEO of GTA England, a network of not-for-profit training organisations, said the August deadline “always felt very challenging” and that “maybe government had originally underestimated the extent of employer feeling” and their level of engagement in the reformed AAPs.

He told FE Week: “Thousands of employers have invested many hours in developing occupational standards and assessment plans and, rightly, want any future changes to reflect their requirements.

“Credible employers of apprentices and quality providers do not want the system undermined by the introduction of assessment regimes which do not give an employer confidence in someone’s practical, not just theoretical, ability to be competent and safe in the workplace.”

He added that employers in areas like engineering and manufacturing would value a slowdown in reviews if it meant a “greater level of upfront consideration of the relative risk associated with any given occupation and the creation of an adequate assessment approach to reflect that risk”.

Set your priorities straight

Skills England launched its “skills for work” programme last month, led by the agency’s board chair Phil Smith, to consider how occupational standards and the training they underpin can “better support growth, employers, places and young people”.

A blog announcing the programme said it “isn’t about individual standards – it’s about making sure the system is fit for the future”.

This work has paused revisions of most apprenticeships except for their assessment plan.

Sector leaders argue the work on occupational standards is ill-timed, does not need a root-and-branch review, and should have been conducted before assessment reform began. The priority right now should instead be on completing reviews of individual apprenticeships.

Ruth Evans, chief executive of the Brewing, Food & Beverage Industry Suppliers’ Association (BFBi), said the level 3 drinks dispense technician apprenticeship was among those left in limbo.

The standard has “not been fully reviewed since its introduction in 2019, despite significant changes in technology, working practices and industry requirements”, she told FE Week, and is also “woefully underfunded” with a funding band of £8,000.

Evans added: “It is deeply disappointing that a government which consistently talks about the importance of upskilling school leavers and young people is seemingly unwilling to invest in the specialist skills required by industries such as drinks dispense.

“We can only assume that decisions are being driven by a numbers game, prioritising apprenticeships with high volumes of starts rather than taking a holistic approach to developing the skilled workforce this country needs.”

In June, skills minister Jacqui Smith ordered a review of apprenticeship funding bands and told Skills England to identify which standards have strong take-up from young people and therefore should be first in line for “potential funding uplifts”.

Smith asked for advice on potential funding rate changes by October. No decisions or advice have yet been made public.

DWP picks 12 providers for national jobs guarantee

An FE college is among 12 organisations chosen to roll out the government’s flagship jobs guarantee scheme to tackle the youth unemployment crisis.

Leeds College of Building has been selected to run the programme in West Yorkshire, while employment support provider Ingeus will cover five of the 25 areas across England, Scotland and Wales.

The guarantee promises eligible 18 to 24-year-olds six months of paid work alongside training and employment support. The national rollout is due to begin in November.

The Department for Work and Pensions announced its preferred delivery partners yesterday. These organisations will source jobs, match participants with employers and deliver tailored support throughout the placement.

After a five-week application round earlier this year, Ingeus was awarded the largest number of areas, covering the North East, Tees Valley, the Black Country, Birmingham, Solihull and Coventry, the East Midlands and Central London.

Employment support providers Fedcap and AKG have been selected for three areas each. PeoplePlus, the King’s Trust, the Growth Company, Reed in Partnership and Seetec will each cover two areas, while Twin Training has one.

Meanwhile, Cornwall Council will cover Devon and Cornwall, and Ealing Council will cover West London on behalf of the West London Alliance.

The jobs guarantee is aimed at young people who have been on universal credit and looking for work for 18 months. Ministers expect it to support more than 90,000 people over three years.

The national rollout follows a first phase, launched in April, across six areas of Great Britain, with the first participants starting jobs in May.

Four of the six organisations running that phase – Ingeus, the Growth Company, Reed in Partnership and the King’s Trust – have been selected for the national programme.

But Catch22, which ran the scheme in Birmingham and Solihull, and Itec Training Solutions, which covered southwest and southeast Wales, are absent from the national list of lead organisations.

Under the published funding model, organisations can claim between £2,150 and £2,650 per participant for running the programme. Guidance states funding cannot be used to make a profit.

The DWP will also cover eligible employment costs for up to 25 hours a week at the relevant minimum wage for six months, plus up to £250 per participant for employers’ onboarding costs.

Referrals must come through Jobcentres. The initial rollout is due to run until November 2028, with final funded job starts by May 2028 and an option to extend the programme by a further year.

Ministers announced last month that young people receiving health benefits would also be able to join voluntarily from April 2027, three months after their work capability assessment.

FE Week has asked whether the selected providers will support this expansion and receive additional funding, and whether November referrals remain on track in all 25 areas. The DWP did not respond.

Jobs guarantee delivery areas across England, Scotland and Wales
Jobs guarantee delivery areas across England, Scotland and Wales