Skip to content
18 April 2026

Latest news from FE Week

Team UK for WorldSkills Shanghai revealed

A team of 26 talented young professionals have been selected to represent the UK at WorldSkills Shanghai this year.

The group of apprentices and students will travel to China this September to compete in the “skills Olympics”, in 24 disciplines including bricklaying, car painting and beauty therapy.

Team UK will go head-to-head against thousands of the best and brightest counterparts from over 80 countries to win gold, silver, and bronze medals.

This will be the 48th WorldSkills competition, with 1,500 young people expected to travel to Shanghai to compete in technical skill disciplines from engineering, manufacturing and technology through to creative, digital and hospitality in front of an estimated quarter of a million visitors.

Shanghai was supposed to host the competition in 2022 but was cancelled due to Covid restrictions in the country.

Ben Blackledge, chief executive of WorldSkills UK, said WorldSkills Shanghai will bring together the world’s best young talent to compete against the highest international standards, giving the UK a “powerful global platform to showcase its skills excellence”.

He added: “At a time when employers are sceptical about employing young people, Team UK show just how important it is to have young professionals in the workforce. These young technicians have an incredibly valuable mix of world-class technical skills, impressive employability skills and a mindset to succeed.

“If we are serious about tackling the NEET challenge, we need to get more young people ready for work, and skills competitions are a proven way to improve engagement in training and work readiness.”

WorldSkills UK has selected 26 champions from a cohort of 86 young people aged 16 to 22 across the UK, who won regional and national skills competitions and have been undergoing an intensive training programme over the last two years.

Several competitors participated in their first international event last year at EuroSkills Herning in Denmark, taking home six medals including one bronze.

The team will enter 24 skills competitions currently. WorldSkills UK is in the “final stages” of entering in the digital construction and robot systems integration competitions.

EuroSkills bronze medallist Patrick Sheerin, who won in Industry 4.0, said making Team UK with his teammate Caolan McCartan is an “incredible relief”.

“Fourteen months ago, Caolan and I found out we’d made Squad UK with the chance to compete in China. It’s been a long journey with the highs of EuroSkills and some lows, and now it’s time to give it our everything,” Sheerin added.

“My family have backed me every step of the way, and they’ll be over the moon. My mum is hoping to come to Shanghai to watch, which will mean a lot at the competition.”

CNC Milling competitor Tomas Ankers told FE Week the news “hasn’t fully sunk in yet”.

Ankers, who attended Coleg Cambria and works at Electroimpact, said: “WorldSkills UK competitions have been such an important part of my journey; it helped me secure my apprenticeship with them by giving me the experience and confidence to stand out in my interview and it’s an amazing feeling to now be continuing that journey all the way to China.”

Tyne Coast College student Neve Dunn, who will compete in beauty therapy, said: “When I found out I’d been selected to train with WorldSkills UK, I made a big decision to change jobs so I could give it my all. A year on, my employer Crown Hair & Beauty, has been amazing, they’ve supported me every step of the way, giving me time to train and develop in the salon. I honestly can’t thank them enough, along with my lecturers at Tyne Coast College, for all their support.”

 

Revealed: The next 19 ‘technical excellence colleges’

The government has confirmed the locations of 19 new ‘technical excellence colleges’ as part of a £175 million skills investment in training for priority industries.

The second wave of technical excellence colleges (TECs), which will begin delivery from this month, are spread across England and will focus on four sectors: defence, clean energy, digital and technologies, and advanced manufacturing.

Ten TECs had already been announced in August 2025 under an earlier £100 million phase of the programme which specialised in construction.

Ministers said the new TECs will support around 65,000 learners to access training for “high-demand jobs” in key growth sectors, where estimates suggest nearly 600,000 additional workers will be needed by 2030.

TECs will act as “hubs of excellence” with funding for selected colleges going towards facilities, teaching and employer partnerships.

As hubs, TECs are also expected to share their expertise with other providers across the country including other FE colleges, independent training providers and university technical colleges.

The sector specialisms are spread across English regions and “strategically located” to align with local industrial demand, the government said.

This includes a defence focus for Blackpool and the Fylde College and City College Plymouth, while Birmingham Metropolitan College and Capital City College will specialise in digital and technologies.

Every region has at least two TECs, while no colleges have more than one specialism.

Prime minister Keir Starmer said: “I want every young person to know there is a clear route into well‑paid work, whatever their background.

“These colleges put technical skills front and centre, opening up high‑quality jobs in the industries driving Britain’s future.

“We are backing talent across the country, strengthening our workforce and making sure opportunity is built into the system – not left to chance.”

Six TECs are also lead partners in the DfE’s Institute of Technology (IoT) network, launched by the Conservative government with £300 million in capital funding seven years ago.

Last year, FE Week revealed that some colleges have ditched the IoT brand in the face of waning ministerial enthusiasm.

The 19 new TECs will receive £175 million in funding for high-quality teaching, better courses and “state-of-the-art specialist equipment”.

For this wave, the funding is divided into £137 million in capital and £38 million in revenue.

The funding package includes £97 million from the Department for Education, £50 million from the Ministry of Defence and £28 million from the Department for Business and Trade.

‘Hubs of excellence’

The government has set out five key aims for TECs: boosting skills provision that leads to in-demand and well-paid work, increasing quality, stronger partnerships with employers, collaborative delivery, and promoting “clear pathways” to higher level learning or growth-driving industries.

In guidance issued for wave two bids, the government said TECs will act as a “hub of excellence” in their sector, sharing their innovative teaching and curricula excellence.

The DfE also expects them to establish networks with other providers who have similar sector needs, such as the automotive industry for advanced manufacturing.

Bid winners will now be expected to submit “high quality” costed delivery plans this summer, setting out how they will spend about £2 million in revenue funding over three years.

Capital funding will vary depending on the TEC’s activity, geographical spread and concentration of industry being supported.

Chief executive of the Association of Colleges, David Hughes, said: “This investment in 19 colleges will help colleges support even more people into good jobs and encourage employers to take on more apprentices and skilled workers.”

Unions start the clock on binding college pay reform

Further education unions have urged general FE college leaders to commit to “time-limited” negotiations on creating binding teacher pay scales in FE.

The demand has been laid out by the National Joint Forum (NJF) of five teaching and support staff trade unions, which is also pushing a 10 per cent teacher pay rise for the third year running.

The unions have pressed the Association of Colleges (AoC) to begin discussing the introduction of national pay bargaining in FE later this Autumn with a set deadline to come to an agreement.

The 2026-27 pay claim comes ahead of negotiations with the AoC later this June, which issues non-binding pay recommendations on behalf of English FE colleges.

In a letter to Gerry McDonald, New City College chief executive and AoC employment policy group chair, the unions reiterated previous calls for a national binding pay framework in FE but this year said representatives must come to the table with an agreed end date.

The NJF also told the AoC agree to “time-limited talks” this autumn to come to an interim agreement that all colleges can meet the minimum pay recommendations ahead of any government funding commitments.

The letter acknowledged the path to a fully funded binding pay framework, as is the case with sixth form colleges, will “take time” to implement in FE but stressed “time-limited talks” must start no later than January 2027.

“The lack of a binding system is one of the biggest threats to industrial harmony,” the claim stated.

College leaders are currently free to offer pay rises to staff that stray away from the AoC’s pay recommendation.

Last year, the AoC recommended colleges offer a 4 per cent pay rise but admitted that many would struggle to afford it.

The move triggered threats of industrial action across dozens of colleges. Unionised FE teachers at 16 colleges ended up walking out in January over lack of pay parity with schoolteachers, national workload agreements and a binding national bargaining framework.

Average FE teacher pay now sits around £10,500 below schoolteachers, the widest gap in at least 15 years.

This year’s pay claim also demanded an FE teachers’ starting salary be “immediately” mirrored with schoolteachers, currently at £31,650.

Other asks from the NJF included a standard 35-hour working week for all full time staff, new proposed caps on teaching hours, new digital boundaries for staff wellbeing.

They also said all colleges should become Foundation Living Wage employers, with specific rates set at no less than £13.45 per hour outside London and £14.80 per hour in London.

AoC chief executive David Hughes urged the government to sit down with its representatives and trade unions to agree a plan on how to close the pay gaps.

“It’s no surprise that the unions are asking for a big increase in pay in this year’s pay claim, because we agree that pay for staff in colleges is below what it should be,” Hughes told FE Week.

“Without extra funding from the government for next academic year, colleges are in a really difficult position and will struggle to make a meaningful pay award. That scenario will result in college pay gaps with schools and the wider labour market widening even further.”

He added: “We will engage with our members in the coming weeks to reach a position everyone supports, and this will inform our discussions at the National Joint Forum in June.”

‘The absolute friend is the truth’: inside Byron Nicolaides’ reckoning over City & Guilds

“We say he or she is my friend, but the absolute friend is the truth,” says Byron Nicolaides.

It is an ancient Greek phrase, he explains – one that has applied in recent months amid the fallout of the sale of the 148-year-old charity City & Guilds’ commercial arm to his private company PeopleCert.

Senior executives pocketing million-pound bonuses, a regulatory inquiry, allegations of “suspect” figures and sackings have all contributed to a bruising post-acquisition six months.

PeopleCert’s own probe into the conduct of individuals, Nicolaides reveals, has completed an initial phase and “based on the internal findings” will now be escalated to examine “potential criminal activities” surrounding the controversial deal.

“To be clear, I am not saying there is criminal activity,” he adds. “We are looking into allegations to see whether there is merit or not.”

‘I did not expect bad faith’

Nicolaides spoke to FE Week days after City & Guilds Ltd CEO Kirstie Donnelly and chief financial officer Abid Ismail were fired without financial settlement. The pair are now preparing their own legal action against PeopleCert. 

Legal advice frustratingly restricts the wealthy entrepreneur from divulging the full details of the internal investigation’s scope or phase one findings, but his choice of words is telling.

“The one thing I can tell you is that PeopleCert and myself, we always acted at the highest level of integrity based on the information that we had at every point of time. The information we had at the beginning, versus the information we have today, may have been different after the investigation.”

Nicolaides admits he was anticipating “difficulties” and scrutiny following the sale of one of Britain’s oldest non-profit educational institutions – City & Guilds of London Institute was founded in 1878 under royal charter – but he “did not expect bad faith”.

While remaining tight-lipped on the internal investigation, which is being led by independent non-executive directors, he references a recent report by The Sunday Times that alleged bidders were provided figures that did not reflect the true scale of investment required to modernise the organisation.

“We were presented with certain numbers, around £23 to £25 million for technology transformation. There are allegations that internal reports were closer to £49 million.”

He adds: “There have been some elements that have been reported in the press, there have been some elements that we have found out, and our team is looking into this.”

Technology investment was central to PeopleCert’s rationale for the acquisition with a promise to modernise a legacy IT system and to restore competitiveness with updated qualifications.

Whether or not there was misrepresentation of those figures, Nicolaides says the total cost of the project now “may end up being over £100 million”.

The bonuses that ignited outrage

The most contentious element of the saga remains post-sale bonuses to the tune of £5 million, paid to over a dozen City & Guilds executives when the sale went through.

Donnelly received £1.7 million while Ismail received £1.2 million.

Kirstie Donnelly and Abid Ismail

While the sale process and decision was made by the charity’s trustees, did executives push through the deal because they stood to gain financially?

“I cannot speculate,” says Nicolaides.

The critical questions of why the bonuses were agreed and when the executives first learned they would be in line for the payments from PeopleCert go unanswered.

“It is not black and white,” Nicolaides says and repeatedly defers to lawyers.

It is also unclear whether PeopleCert will seek to recoup the bonuses paid to the former CEO and CFO following their exit.

After the interview, the company consulted its lawyers and told FE Week: “The payment of bonuses subsequent to the acquisition is part of an ongoing internal investigation and related to ongoing legal proceedings. As such we cannot comment further.

“We are committed to the highest standards of governance, transparency and integrity and will confirm the outcome of the investigation when it concludes.”

The Charity Commission’s statutory inquiry, which opened in January and is separate from PeopleCert’s internal review, is also ongoing.

A Save City & Guilds Action Group is calling for a fully independent inquiry into the conduct of the executives and trustee board.

Former City & Guilds of London Institute chair Ann Limb, who was made a Baroness in December, told The Sunday Times in February that she will not be taking her seat in the Lords until “matters relating to my previous voluntary roles are resolved”.

‘We’re probably going to go against the lawyer’s’

PeopleCert’s commitment to “confirm the outcome” of its own internal investigation is carefully phrased.

Nicolaides previously wrote for FE Week making clear his company welcomes scrutiny “because we believe that robust oversight ultimately strengthens the entire system”, adding that providers that “resist transparency do a disservice to learners and undermine public trust in vocational education”.

So, on that note, will the full investigation findings be made public eventually?

Nicolaides says: “If I ask this question to our lawyers, they’re going to tell me definitely no. But what I can commit to you, and this is Byron, we’re probably going against the lawyers at some point.

“The financial aspect of this is not important. The integrity and transparency of doing the right thing is extremely important.

“At some point in time I will say, ‘guys, maybe we cannot give all the reports, but this is what happened and this is our actions and you judge whether I’ve done the right thing or not’. I hope they say, yes Byron, you did the right thing.”

Throughout the interview, Nicolaides returns to the term integrity.

It is, he says, one of PeopleCert’s defining values.

“You cannot build an organisation without integrity,” he says. “It is doing the right thing when people are not watching.”

The business case

Beyond the controversy lies a more fundamental question: whether the sale itself of a national heritage institution was justified.

It is days before the governing council of the City & Guilds Foundation – the charity left after the sale – meets for its annual general meeting in London on April 15.

Nicolaides, who is expecting a “big fight” at the meeting, says the transaction itself was a highly competitive process, run “flawlessly” by top investment bank advisers, consultants and lawyers.

It was run “very similar” to the process that the UK government ran when PeopleCert acquired Axelos from the Cabinet Office in 2021. Nothing felt improper.

He notes the ideological opposition to the City & Guilds sale, but argues the awarding business needed radical change, and that only a private operator could deliver it.

“City & Guilds was in bad shape,” he says. “Losing money. Losing market share. Technology from the 1980s.”

In his view, the organisation was structurally incapable of competing in a modern and globalised qualifications market. He listed a range of constraints caused by its charitable status, “clumsy” governance model, and lack of capital.

“Charities cannot compete with private organisations,” he says. “You don’t have the flexibility. You don’t have the resources and can’t take the risk. The decision-making process is ten times more complicated.”

PeopleCert, he argues, offers the opposite. “We have the willingness, we have the energy, we have the knowledge, we have the technology, we have the power, and we have the money to do it globally. We are workaholics and want to be champions.”

He is adamant that with his plan for change the organisation’s impact will surpass current levels.

“The economic value was around £15 billion in 2025,” he says. “We will significantly increase it.”

“Outdated” qualifications will be updated to form “the best portfolio” that addresses learner needs ahead of competitors, and the business will be “digital first in the AI era”.

He also promises measurable social outcomes, particularly for disadvantaged learners.

From rags to riches

Nicolaides is not the archetypal education grandee. He was born in Istanbul in 1959 to a poor Greek family. His parents were teachers at community schools where there was no guaranteed salary.

Arriving in Greece as an immigrant in 1981, he says he spent the first eight months sleeping on the floor with no money to buy a bed.

But he worked hard and created multiple businesses as a serial entrepreneur before being headhunted by Merrill Lynch, rising rapidly in the investment firm to vice president of international. By his early thirties, he was a multimillionaire.

“I had more money than I needed,” he says. “I wanted to do something useful to society.”

The pivot was education. First, a computer training franchise in Greece in the 1990s and then certification.

The result was PeopleCert, founded by Nicolaides in 2000. The fast-growing assessment giant delivers language examinations in over 200 countries and also certifies the PRINCE2 project management and ITIL IT management courses.

Following a €450 million acquisition of Axelos in 2021, PeopleCert was described as the first Greek ‘unicorn’ company owing to its combined value exceeding €1 billion.

City & Guilds is now the second, but dominant, Ofqual-regulated awarding organisation in the PeopleCert group of companies alongside LanguageCert, most known for its international ESOL qualifications.

And this isn’t the first acquisition involving the pair: LanguageCert bought City & Guilds’ intellectual property and related assessment materials for English language qualifications in 2015.

Nicolaides claims that since the 2015 deal, City & Guilds has “lost the international market” with this part of the charity falling more than 50 per cent. PeopleCert has meanwhile increased LanguageCert’s global business by 700 per cent.

“We’re going to repeat the same story”, he says, “we are going to make City & Guilds global again”.

The businessman argues that this will help increase the competitiveness of the UK.

“Vocational skills are the heart of transformation globally. All of the production capacity of the West – UK, Europe, US – has moved to Asia, we’re buying everything from Asia.

“Now they want to bring it back. And we need the right workforce, the right skills, and this needs investment, this needs technology and businesses looking to the long-term horizon. PeopleCert is really committed to this.”

Nicolaides dismisses the view that if an organisation is not-for-profit then the people who work there are “first class citizens” while those who are for profit are “second class citizens”.

“Integrity is integrity,” he says. “Whether you are for-profit or not-for-profit.”

He points out that City & Guilds was fined by Ofqual three times in seven and a half years and takes a swipe at the organisation’s 1.5 out of 5-star TrustPilot rating (PeopleCert has a 4-star rating).

“I want to have an organisation that is not going to be fined by Ofqual. I want Ofqual to say this is the best in class.”

He also says City & Guilds Foundation is now in a secure position. It has close to £200 million in assets owing to the sale, which included PeopleCert buying its building and giving the charity five years of free rent, allowing the trustees to ramp up their charitable activities.

Offshore jobs and training provider sell-offs?

Governance has dominated headlines but leaked information about the future direction of travel has fuelled anxiety within City & Guilds’ commercial organisation post-sale.

Plans to reduce staffing costs by tens of millions of pounds and potentially relocate roles to Greece have prompted concern among employees. FE Week understands growing numbers of staff are joining unions.

Nicolaides frames the issue in financial terms.

“Close to 70 per cent of revenue was going to staff,” he says. “That is not sustainable.”

He insists no final decisions have been made, emphasising that initial projections were based on limited data.

But he does not deny that change is coming.

“We are reviewing everything,” he says. “We have to operate as a commercial organisation.”

Part of that review is three training providers – Gen2, Intertrain and Trade Skills 4U – which also transferred to PeopleCert and remain under the City & Guilds brand.

Asked whether he intends to keep or sell those training arms, Nicolaides refuses to comment and repeats: “We’re reviewing options, looking at whether this is strategic.”

No regrets

Despite the turmoil, Nicolaides has “no regrets” about acquiring City & Guilds.

He often asks his team what impact the public controversy has had on customers and learners, but they receive “only positive” feedback.

“Kirstie and all this stuff, people don’t care,” he says. “What they care about is the future of the business.”

He states that the next chapter for the organisation will be steered by seven pledges (see image below) that include putting learners first, creating public confidence through the highest standards and governance, putting training provider, college and employer customers central, and delivering for the UK government’s skills agenda.

“I’m here to tell them, ‘listen, guys, give me time and I’ll prove you that I’m worth it’,” he says.

London mayor uses unspent adult skills funding for youth NEETs programme

Millions in unspent adult education funding held by the mayor of London will be diverted to youth unemployment schemes.

Over the next two years, London mayor Sadiq Khan (pictured) will use £9 million of the Greater London Authority’s (GLA) adult skills fund (ASF) reserves to pay for the capital city’s support for young Londoners-NEET programme.

The move has prompted concerns that already-stretched adult education funding is being used to “fill gaps” left by government cuts for other programmes.

London’s ASF reserves will cover the loss of the UK Shared Prosperity Fund (UKSPF), cut by the national government in March, which previously funded the majority of the capital’s youth programme.

According to a recent update, the GLA holds about £28 million in ASF reserves, which are accumulated underspends built up since the authority gained devolved control of about £340 million per year in adult skills funding in 2019.

Over the next two financial years, the mayor will use his ASF reserves and £1.5 million Department for Work and Pensions youth trailblazer funding to sustain initiatives aimed at around 6,000 young people facing “the most significant barriers” to education, employment and training.

This includes ‘Jumpstart to Success’ programme, aiming to support 16 to 24-year-olds in central London through mentorship and guidance that builds practical skills and fosters a sense of “purpose and empowerment”.

A total of 13 programmes will be run across London by local authorities, businesses and charities.

The GLA launched the youth NEET programme in 2024-25, with £9 million in from the UKSPF, but a “much reduced” allocation the following year prompted it to use £2 million in ASF reserves.

Other planned uses of the estimated £28 million in ASF reserves include “mitigating” the reduction in ASF funding from the DfE in 2025-26, funding 2 per cent over delivery tolerances for providers, and contingency allowance for its talent pathways programme.

Sue Pember, policy lead at adult education provider body HOLEX, told FE Week: “Diverting adult skills funding to support 16 to 18 NEET programmes risks undermining already stretched adult education budgets.

“Adult learning has already absorbed a further 1.65 per cent reduction this year, alongside tighter regulatory constraints and no growth allocation in the previous funding round.

“It is also penalising adult colleges that are overdelivering, with no reward for the additional engagement and skills provision they are achieving.”

She said that youth NEET programmes should not come “at the expense” of adult learners who rely on publicly funded programmes to retrain or re-enter the workforce and urged the GLA to take a “more sustainable and transparent” approach.

“Using ASF reserves in this way raises important questions about whether funding intended for adult education is being repurposed to fill gaps left by the withdrawal of other government programmes,” she added.

“A more sustainable and transparent funding approach is needed to ensure both young people and adult learners are properly supported, rather than forcing a trade-off between the two.”

Chair of the London Assembly’s economy, culture and skills committee, Hina Bokhari, said the mayor is right to try and maintain support for young NEETs now EU and UKSPF funding has “fallen away”.

But, she added, this “also reflects the reality that he has little choice but to draw on adult education reserves to plug that gap”.

“At a time when London faces major skills shortages, diverting money intended for adult skills and qualifications risks becoming a case of robbing Peter to pay Paul,” Bokhari told FE Week.

“The bigger question is whether these programmes can deliver lasting outcomes in a labour market where entry-level jobs are shrinking, particularly with the rise of AI, or whether they risk becoming a sticking plaster for deeper structural challenges.”

The cost of leadership

Being CEO of an organisation is rewarding – personally and financially. Risks carried, decisions taken are shared by the collective body to whom the individual leader is accountable. When it works well, the price paid to exercise executive leadership is worth the cost to the individual leader and to the organisation.

Collective leadership by charity trustees, undertaken voluntarily, comes at a different price; its cost rarely considered. Sometimes devastating consequences ensue as at City & Guilds of London Institute (CGLI), the charity I chaired until recently. Disproportionate and unsubstantiated attacks in the media on former executives and CGLI trustees leave me disheartened, disillusioned, and dismayed – a sad conclusion to 35 years’ voluntary service in over 50 charities.

Over the last four months, ill-informed commentary and serious personal allegations (‘secretive deal’, ‘unlawful sale’, ‘illegality’) have been made in the media. The Charity Commission (CCEW) is the appropriate regulatory body for independent investigation of such claims, and I was pleased to meet them recently.

I am disappointed however, that concerns have not been taken up directly with me as chair of CGLI at the time of the divestment. I take no issue with rightful and necessary scrutiny. I welcome challenge and face-to-face engagement. Through listening to concerns, mutual understanding – although not necessarily shared agreement – can be achieved. Disagreeing agreeably is a responsibility of leadership. The torchlights of scrutiny must be shone on facts and not on fiction.

The facts are that CGLI is not a public body, as has been claimed. It is a registered charity. In 2020, the board, then chaired by Sir John Armitt, and under Kirstie Donnelly’s executive leadership recognised that CGLI faced a difficult commercial environment, an increasingly competitive, constantly changing UK qualifications scene, and an IT infrastructure requiring significant investment. CGLI was financially vulnerable. Trustees had a choice – face up to or ignore this challenge.

In May 2023, to avoid further decline, trustees acknowledged that CGLI’s long-term financial future called for strategic transformation. The ‘do nothing’ option would have resulted in continued gradual descent into peril as evidenced in published accounts over the last ten years. As charity trustees, ignoring this would be tantamount to dereliction of duty.

The decision to divest the charity’s commercial assets was instigated by trustees. Through a formal tender process, trustees engaged specialist independent commercial and legal advisers. Together between May 2023 and October 2025, they undertook a detailed commercially confidential review and options process, restricted by NDAs and called Project Birthday. Led by a trustee chaired task group, which excluded me as chair, it comprised trustees with specialist commercial experience and financial expertise. Its work was recorded and regularly reported to the board and its committees.

Trustees’ overriding collective responsibility was to act lawfully to secure the best possible price for the divestment. Trustees obtained almost twice the original estimated value. In ceding control to PeopleCert through the sale of loss-making commercial activities, trustees disposed of assets that for decades had operated uneasily under the umbrella of a charity, simultaneously preserved a structurally unchanged, now financially secure charity able to fulfil its educational charitable objects.

Acting throughout on external advice, in taking what was a carefully considered decision, trustees did not act unlawfully in undertaking a commercial transaction strictly in confidence, were not in breach of CGLI’s constitution or Royal Charter by not informing the council until its meeting on October 16, 2025 and consulted with, but did not require, regulatory approval from CCEW.

Trustees were required, as a condition of sale, to ensure that the purchaser of the awarding organisation, PeopleCert, received full registration from Ofqual before divestment. In concluding the sale on October 31, 2025, with Department for Education knowledge, Ofqual approval was given to PeopleCert – at a time of least disruption to learners and examination centres – which was the shared objective of all parties.

Leadership decisions are sometimes inadequately communicated, misunderstood, or unpopular, and can have consequences which not everyone accepts. This does not make decisions wrong or unlawful or the people that took them villains or criminals.

CGLI trustees acted in a voluntary capacity, in good faith, in accordance with the charity’s objects, completing three years of considerably complex confidential work and deriving no personal benefit. Trustees took the right collective leadership decision and action, at the right time, to secure a financially strong future for the charity – which was our duty.

Healthcare provider stops new starts amid Ofsted ‘urgent improvement’ verdict

A healthcare apprenticeship provider has paused starts while it battles with poor achievement rates that led to Ofsted dishing out multiple ‘urgent improvement’ judgments.

Hertfordshire-based Averee Ltd received the lowest possible rating for both leadership and governance and achievement in a report published today under the watchdog’s new report card system.

The provider, which mostly trains adult care worker apprentices online, saw its overall apprenticeship achievement rate fall 12 percentage points from 36.2 per cent in 2023-24 to 24.2 per cent in 2024-25, compared to the national average of 65.4 per cent.

Inspectors found leaders had a “superficial understanding” of the provider’s strengths and weaknesses, with poor oversight leading to ineffective tracking of apprentice progress. While leaders recognised the need to improve retention and completion, Ofsted said their actions had failed to deliver results.

A spokesperson for Averee said the company had already taken a “proactive” decision to pause recruitment in July 2025 to focus on improving quality and outcomes for its existing learners.

The report marks the second further education provider to receive the lowest grade since Ofsted scrapped overall effectiveness judgments in favour of a five-point scale across multiple areas, ranging from ‘exceptional’ to ‘urgent improvement’. The first was JS Consult, another healthcare apprenticeship provider with similarly weak achievement rates.

At the time of inspection, Averee had 51 adult apprentices, most studying level 2 and 3 adult care programmes and level 5 leader in adult care. A small number were enrolled on higher-level care and management standards. Training is delivered largely online.

Inspectors identified widespread weaknesses in delivery. Too few apprentices complete their programmes on time and too many fail altogether. Many learners are unclear about what they need to do to finish their apprenticeship and are poorly prepared for final assessments.

Those who fall behind are not supported effectively to catch up, while leaders were criticised for setting low expectations that fail to motivate apprentices or ensure timely progress.

English, maths and digital skills development was also found to be poor. Staff do not consistently correct written English errors, leading apprentices to repeat mistakes, while spoken English is not developed well enough to prepare learners for professional discussions at their final assessment.

Although recent interventions such as additional mock tests have been introduced, inspectors said these are too new to show any impact.

Ofsted acknowledged that leaders have a clear aim to make training accessible to the healthcare workforce and are now rethinking their strategy – including whether to continue offering apprenticeships in the sector at all.

Despite this, safeguarding arrangements were deemed effective, and apprentices who remain on programme benefit from strong pastoral support. Learners reported feeling safe and said tutors help them manage their wellbeing and build resilience.

Averee received three ‘needs attention’ ratings, including for inclusion, curriculum and teaching, and participation and development.

The provider argued that external pressures in the healthcare sector, including service closures and workforce changes among a small pool of employer partners, have disproportionately affected achievement rates. The provider pointed to an in-year retention rate of 80 per cent as evidence of “strong” learner support and engagement.

Under government accountability rules, an ‘urgent improvement’ judgment places apprenticeship providers in an “at risk” category, typically triggering intervention from the Department for Education and potentially leading to contract termination.

Averee said it is working closely with officials to secure a “stable and high-quality path forward” while reviewing its long-term apprenticeship strategy.

“Our priority remains ensuring that all learners are supported to successfully complete their programmes,” the spokesperson added.

“We remain committed to acting with transparency and integrity throughout this process.”

City & Guilds execs to launch legal action after exit

Top City & Guilds executives Kirstie Donnelly and Abid Ismail are preparing legal action after being officially exited from their roles by the awarding body’s new owners, FE Week can reveal.

City & Guilds staff were informed this evening that chief executive Kirstie Donnelly and chief financial officer Abid Ismail, who were placed on leave in January amid an internal investigation, have been exited from the organisation.

In a statement to FE Week, legal representatives for Donnelly and Ismail confirmed their departure from the organisation and said “full litigation” would be taken against the move.

City & Guilds staff were informed by email this evening that Donnelly and Ismail “have left the business” after a “rigorous internal process” supported by external advice.

The email said the decision reflected the board’s commitment to “the highest standards of governance and integrity” and confirmed “their departure was not subject to any financial settlement.”

It also stated that the matter is subject to “ongoing legal proceedings” and no further details will be shared.

The pair were placed on leave in January when an internal investigation, led by PeopleCert’s legal representatives and non-executive board members, was launched to examine information “to fully understand events before and after” it bought the City & Guilds awarding business from the charity City & Guilds of London Institute in October.

Staff were told Andy Moss will continue as interim CEO, supported by Konstantinos Andrikopoulos as acting chief financial officer. 

The investigation was launched shortly after City & Guilds’ sale to PeopleCert, which saw the awarding body move into private ownership for the first time in its 150 year history.

Staff were told this evening to respect confidentiality and avoid speculation.

The sale is also subject to a statutory Charity Commission inquiry, which is yet to report

In a statement this evening, representatives acting for Donnelly and Ismail said: “We can confirm that our clients have both left the business. However, as we will shortly be commencing full litigation against CGL [City & Guilds Limited], on their behalf in respect of this matter, neither we nor they will be making any further comment at this time.”

Colchester college wins Court of Appeal VAT fight

Court of Appeal judges have ruled in favour of Colchester Institute in a landmark VAT dispute with HMRC, paving the way for colleges to reclaim tax on pre-2010 building projects.

The government tax authority has been locked in a dispute with the Essex college since the 2010s over what tax discounts it can claim on a large building project.

Judges in the lower tax courts, the High Court and now the Court of Appeal, the second most senior in England and Wales, have repeatedly ruled in favour of Colchester Institute.

The ruling means Colchester Institute, and an estimated 20 to 30 colleges with similar claims, should now be able to reclaim VAT payments made on capital projects started before 2010 that will be used for teaching a mix of fully-funded and fee-paying students.

However, it has also extended a state of uncertainty, as the colleges – and potentially charities – could permanently lose large VAT discounts for charitable organisations.

An HMRC spokesperson told FE Week: “We note the decision and are carefully considering our next steps.” It has until April 24 to decide whether to apply to appeal to the Supreme Court.

After it first lost the dispute in the Upper Tax Tribunal in 2020, HMRC took the rare step of telling colleges they could effectively ignore the ruling – despite the court decision setting a binding legal precedent – while its lawyers mounted a “test” appeal in the High Court.

Colleges known to have similar claims to Colchester Institute include Portsmouth College, Cornwall College, and Derby College Group.  

The disagreement centres on a series of VAT claims Colchester Institute made on a large building project started in 2008, using a rule known as the ‘Lennartz mechanism’.

The Upper Tax Tribunal agreed, ruling that the college’s grant-funded education should be treated as a “business activity” for VAT purposes, rather than a “non-business activity”.

However, this classification change excludes colleges from being able to claim VAT reliefs, which could result in some colleges having to pay millions more in tax.

Reliefs include a zero-VAT rate for new-build construction projects and five per cent tax rates on fuel and power costs.

Colchester Institute’s victory has also been described as a “one-off”, as HMRC withdrew permission for colleges to use the Lennartz mechanism in 2010.

Socrates Socratous, VAT consultancy partner at accountancy firm Buzzacott, told FE Week that if the ruling stands, it could be a “problem” for colleges currently constructing brand new buildings that could lose VAT reliefs.

He said HMRC should issue new guidance for the college and charity sector clarifying what its position is.

Socratous added: “This decision is good for Colchester Institute, but the implication goes beyond just colleges.

“It’s something that might affect the charity sector generally, to its detriment, and I think that’s why HMRC needs to take a step back and think about what they’re going to do.”

Noel Tyler, executive chairman of VATangles, which advises Colchester Institute, said: “There was always, to me anyway, a clear and obvious disconnect between HMRC’s longstanding policy and binding case law with regards to the fundamental question of what is, and what is not, for VAT purposes, a ‘business activity’.

“Indeed, HMRC’s policy on the matter is entirely friendless in law, and yet they persist with it, and not just in respect of FE colleges.

“They have actually been quite aggressive with colleges who have applied the binding law.

“However, the Court of Appeal has had no apparent difficulty in, yet again, rejecting HMRC’s arguments. It will be interesting to see where they go now.”

Colchester Institute said: “The college does not comment on matters where there might be further legal implication.”