FE leaders must work together on AI to deliver what students need

Across and beyond FE, there is a mixture of excitement, cautious optimism and nervousness around artificial intelligence (AI).  

Colleges are increasingly aware of the significant opportunities AI presents, but also the challenges it brings for leaders, staff, students and parents alike.  

AI represents a fundamental shift in expectations – for learners, employers and for the education system itself. The question is not whether FE engages with AI, but how we do so in a way that is strategic, inclusive and most importantly true to our values. 

There is cause for optimism. AI is already reshaping the skills employers need and the way students expect to learn and be supported. 

But there are barriers to our ability to provide the tools employers see emerging, and which their future employees will be required to use. In FE, funding, time and capacity are hindrances to potential early AI adoption. 

As a sector, we have a collective responsibility to ensure FE plays its part in leading this change.  

That is why we have formed a community of leaders focused on the adoption and advancement of AI in FE.

This is a community built for the sector, by the sector. A space where leaders can come together to define priorities and formulate roadmaps to tackle them head on. 

Partnership working enables more shared resources, funding and opportunities.

The American computer scientist Fei-Fei Li said “AI is not a substitute for human intelligence, it is a tool to amplify human creativity and ingenuity”.

This should resonate deeply with FE. Our mission has always been about investing in people – developing skills, confidence and opportunity so learners can progress into further study, meaningful work and fulfilling careers. AI should enhance that mission, not distract from it. 

However, there is a risk that the sector approaches AI as a technology purchasing challenge.

If AI becomes about buying more tools, without clarity of purpose or alignment to strategy, we will fail to realise its potential.

Some colleges appear to be moving quickly, while others are struggling to do anything at all. That gap matters. It means that, as a system, we are not yet leading from the front. The government expects FE to be proactive on AI – not lagging behind.

Without coordinated leadership and planning, we risk fragmented progress, wasted investment and, most importantly, learners and communities being left behind.

One of the reasons progress can feel uneven is that many FE leaders feel vulnerable talking openly about AI. There can be a fear of saying the wrong thing, or of appearing behind the curve.

That is precisely why safe, trusted spaces for collaboration are essential. Our new community of leaders is designed to provide that space – enabling honest conversations, shared learning and collective problem-solving. 

Through this community, we aim to explore practical themes such as developing AI strategies for colleges, leading people and teams through technological change, improving efficiency through AI, governance and ethical leadership, and the potential of smart campuses.

Just as importantly, there is a significant opportunity for colleges to agree, collectively, how we share and jointly commission AI tools and solutions. 

We are already working with partners including the Association of Colleges, Amazon Web Services and others to create the conditions for meaningful strategic collaboration, and we look forward to sharing more.

HRUC’s wider partnerships, including with Amazon, underline our commitment to learning from global expertise while keeping FE values at the centre. 

In the coming months, we will also be bringing leaders together at a dedicated event to continue this conversation.

AI is moving fast. But with proper system-wide planning, collaboration and leadership, FE can move with confidence. 

Now is the time for leaders to step forward, work together and shape an AI-enabled future that delivers for all. 

£23m expansion of edtech and AI pilot

The government is investing £23 million in a four-year pilot to trial artificial intelligence and edtech tools in schools and colleges, the education secretary has announced.

Opening the BETT UK conference, Bridget Phillipson said the scheme will “put the latest tech and AI tools through their paces in the cut and thrust of classrooms across the country”.

It is an expansion of a previous nine-month pilot in which schools and colleges trialled “innovative” edtech tools. It is not clear how many schools took part.

More than 1,000 schools and colleges will be involved in the new project, which will begin in September, the Department for Education confirmed.

A DfE spokesperson said it “will recruit schools and colleges to put the latest edtech to the test in classrooms, analysing their impact on pupil outcomes, including those with SEND, and on teacher workload”.

Pilot will track impact on staff and students

Phillipson told the BETT conference: “We’re investing an additional £23 million to expand our edtech testbed pilot into a four-year programme.

“It recruits schools and colleges to put the latest tech and AI tools through their paces in the cut and thrust of classrooms across the country.

“We’ll track how these tools perform the difference they make for teachers and, above all, the difference they can make for children.”

She said the pilot will gather “genuine evidence about what’s working, the cream of education tech and AI rising to the top so that we can spread that transformative potential far and wide”.

Phillipson added that she is “so excited about AI because it means that we can have the chance to make the education system work better for every single learner”.

The DfE said it has already had more than 280 expressions of interest from the edtech sector, from those wanting to be involved in the scheme.

IFS: 16-18 funding needs extra £150m by 2028 to maintain real-terms spending

Funding for 16 to 18 education will need to rise by a further £150 million by 2028-29 simply to maintain spending per student in real terms, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies.

The warning comes in the IFS’s annual report on education spending in England, which highlights growing demographic pressure across further education and skills that is “absorbing” recent funding commitments.

Economists at the think tank urged for further real-terms increases “beyond” those already announced to account for growth in 16- to 18-year-olds of around 70,000 (3 per cent) students by 2028.

The report, supported by the Nuffield Foundation, also highlighted concerns of a “narrower” apprenticeship flexibility under the new growth and skills levy, modular Lifelong Learning Entitlement take up and deficit pressures on colleges.

‘Limited detail’ on funding boosts and allocations 

The report’s authors cast doubt on the commitments made in the Spending Review last June that indicated that the overall FE and skills budget would rise by just over £300 million in real terms between 2025-26 and 2028-29.

Altogether the skills budget, made up of 16 to 19 education, adult skills and apprenticeships, accounts for £14 billion of public spending in 2025-26.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves pledged an additional £1.2 billion per year in day-to-day funding for FE by 2028-29, in cash terms.

But the Treasury did not publish a detailed breakdown of how the increased funding would be doled out across the different parts of the further education and skills system, which the IFS said leaves “scope for it to be distributed in different ways”.

The Department for Education’s post-16 white paper published in October confirmed a real-terms boost of £450 million to the 16 to 19 budget between this academic year and 2026–27, which the authors said will reverse some of the real-terms funding decline seen since the 2010s.

“This would lead to a 2.5 per cent real-terms increase in spending per student aged 16-19 over this period. This would return funding per student in colleges to around its 2012-13 level and funding in school sixth forms to levels last seen in the mid 2010s,” the report said.

It added that after the increase, per student funding in FE would remain 6 per cent below 2010-11 levels.

“Although the white paper set out a broad range of policies, there was limited detail on how different strands are intended to fit together or how key trade-offs within the skills system would be addressed,” economists added.

More cash needed to meet demographic surge

The post-16 white paper indicated a desire to at least hold spending per student constant in real terms. 

IFS’ economists said that between 2018 and 2025, the number of 16- to 18-year- olds in England grew by around 300,000, or 16 per cent. Population projections suggest a further increase of around 70,000 (3 per cent) by 2028, when the number of 16- to 18-year-olds is expected to peak. 

The authors concluded that based on these population projections, maintaining spending per student at its 2026-27 level in real terms would require total funding to increase by a further £150 million (in today’s prices) by 2028-29.

SEND white paper will be ‘pivotal’ to addressing pressures

The most “acute” financial pressure is in special educational needs and disabilities (SEND), with the IFS warning that the government’s upcoming white paper on SEND reform will be “pivotal” to addressing soaring council deficits and provision demand.

The Office for Budget Responsibility has forecasted a £6 billion gap between expected spending and funding SEND provision by 2028-29.

The IFS expects SEND spending to more than double in real terms between 2015 and 2028. Over the last decade the think tank said SEND has accounted for over half the increase in total school funding over the period.

But local councils have been forced to spend more, causing them to build up deficits of up to £14 billion by 2027-28.

IFS report showing spending and funding for SEND from 2015-2028

Additionally, SEND transport spending almost doubled to £2 billion between 2018-19 and 2024-25, though a breakdown on post-16 transport was not provided. 

Luke Sibieta, IFS research fellow and author said: “The current system is increasingly costly and failing to deliver for everyone. Whether the government can both put the system on a stronger long-term footing, and manage to generate shorter-term savings, will be a crucial test for the forthcoming schools white paper.”

Nearly 3 in 10 colleges in deficit

The report also found almost three in 10 colleges are in deficit, according to analysis of the latest 2023-24 figures.

In 2010-11, just 16 per cent of colleges (weighted by income) were operating in deficit. This more than tripled to 54 per cent by 2015-16 and almost one in five colleges reported deficits exceeding 5 per cent of their income.

While financial performance has improved since its peak in 2017, by 2023-24, 28 per cent of colleges were in deficit. Additionally, 16 per cent of those colleges had been in deficit for at least three consecutive years.

The think tank’s authors said the “persistent” deficits frame the cost pressures colleges are likely to come up against in the next several years.

“Colleges have limited scope to absorb these pressures through adjustments to their largest area of spending, staff costs.”

Staff costs account for around 70 per cent of spending in English colleges in England but staff pay has seen substantial real terms pay cuts since 2010.

“With recruitment and retention challenges evident, colleges are likely to have limited scope to reduce staff costs further without risking additional strain on staffing capacity and provision,” the report added.

It added that the 2022 reclassification of colleges as public sector bodies has limited colleges’ ability to manage pressures through commercial borrowing or short-term financial adjustments.

Apprenticeships units could be ‘narrower’ model than promised

The report criticised the opacity of how new short, flexible courses will be delivered under the evolved growth and skills and levy.

DfE’s post-16 white paper last year indicated that employers will be able to use the levy on “apprenticeship” units but gave no “significant detail” about how apprenticeship units will be defined, approved or delivered.

Economists said this was “concerning” given that they are planned to be rolled out in April 2026. 

The units that will be only available in a set of “designated critical skills areas”, which the report said would restricts eligibility to courses needed in areas of labour market need and limit the extent to which the levy supports wider workforce development.

“The government appears to be moving towards a narrower model than the broader flexibility proposed prior to the election,” the report said.

“The challenge for the government will be to balance flexibility, cost control and the targeting of public funds towards training with demonstrable economic value.”

Uncertainty around Lifelong Learning Entitlement modular take up

The report’s authors also said they will be examining the take up of Lifelong Learning Entitlement (LLE) funded short courses in the coming year.

The first LLE-funded courses are expected to open for applications in September 2026. Applicants will also be able to take out loans for individual modules or short courses rather than full qualifications, initially only for subject areas outlined in the government’s industrial strategy.

The IFS cast doubts on the value of short courses, plus a possible reluctance from learners to take on debt for modular provision, and “uncertain” incentives facing providers.

Ministers urge colleges to expand overseas

Colleges are being encouraged to expand their education offer overseas, with ministers pledging to slash regulation and support cash flow.

Ministers have today published a new cross-department “International Education Strategy” that aims to grow the value of education exports from the current level of £32.3 billion a year to £40 billion a year by 2030.

Central to the aim is encouraging colleges, universities and schools to seek demand-led ventures overseas. The Department for Education said it will push for long-term relationships rather than “short-term or speculative ventures”.

Colleges have made numerous attempts to run international ventures in countries like India and Saudi Arabia over the past decade, but often had to cut ties due to recruitment struggles and unfavourable payment terms.

Most recent college finance data shows just 7 colleges recorded income generated from overseas delivery in 2023-24.

The new strategy states that government will back education providers seeking to diversify income by removing red tape and giving access to export finance, market intelligence, and the UK’s overseas network.

The Conservative government launched a post-Brexit export strategy for education in 2019, aiming for a £35 billion export value by 2030.

Today’s refreshed strategy states that government will set up an “education sector action group” to work with Professor Sir Steve Smith, the international education champion, colleges and schools to help “unblock” barriers to trade to expand overseas.

Officials said education providers and businesses will develop 100-day action plans with the action group that will identify appropriate and demand-led opportunities abroad and remove regulatory barriers that make overseas operations difficult.

Colleges will still be responsible for seeking approval of any novel transactions that require DfE approval, in line with rules following reclassification of colleges to the public sector in November 2022.

Today’s strategy also reiterated the UK government’s commitment to rejoin the Erasmus+ programme in 2027. The country’s current international placement initiative, the Turing Scheme, will continue for a sixth year until Erasmus is rejoined.

Emma Meredith, the Association of College’s director of skills policy and global engagement, said it was “encouraging” to see colleges recognised in the strategy and the steps to grow their contribution towards the new £40 billion annual export target, adding that there are “excellent and long-standing international partnerships in colleges across the country, with many engaged in student mobility, student recruitment and transnational education”.

However, Meredith said colleges “face a lot of red tape and policy restrictions, causing unnecessary barriers for those looking to expand or to initiate their international offer”. 

The AoC will “work with the government to identify and remove these barriers to export and ensure that colleges can fulfil their potential in the international space”.

She added: “For too long, the potential of further education and skills in the education export space has been overlooked. As public sector organisations, colleges must always manage risk and conduct due diligence whilst exploring opportunities that may be appropriate for them.”

Historical low demand from overseas expansions

Colleges have ventured abroad in the past with limited success due to struggles with recruiting students and difficulties of working under short-term agreements.

AoC India, a college partnership network set up by the Association of Colleges to provide UK vocational education and training programmes to India, closed down in 2016 after losing over three-quarters of its members in its four years of establishment.

Multiple colleges have also pulled out of partnerships with Saudi Arabia through its controversial “colleges of excellence” (CoE) scheme over low demand, strict payment terms, delays and short five-year term agreements.

Burton and South Derbyshire College (BSDC) offered vocational courses at a female-only technical education college in Jeddah until 2023 when its partnership ended, though it has continued a reduced operation in the hope of securing a longer-term contract in the near-future.

The college said last year that there were talks of Saudi Arabia offering contracts of 10 years and longer for UK-based colleges that run courses in the country through a new procurement model.

Amrit Virk, BSDC’s assistant principal for marketing, business development and international, told FE Week today that the college “anticipates new contracts will be launched imminently”, adding that the college is “excited about the potential opportunities to work collaboratively in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia”.

Lincoln College remains the only college to hold a current contract with Saudi Arabia. 

Just 7 colleges recorded income generated from overseas delivery in financial year 2023-24, according to DfE data. Lincoln College generated the most (£14.1m), followed by Capital City College (£603k) then South Essex College (£173k).

Education secretary Bridget Phillipson said: “UK education is one of our most valuable exports and this strategy backs the sector to go even further – underlining our commitment to fuel UK growth.   

“By expanding overseas, our universities, colleges and education providers can diversify income, strengthen global partnerships and give millions more access to a world-class UK education on their doorstep, all whilst boosting growth at home. 

“This strategy and our Plan for Change, will drive growth that delivers for our economy and for communities across the UK, as well as our standing in the world.”   

Minister for trade Chris Bryant added that the UK is “on track” grow the sector to £40 billion by 2030, powered by providers driving digital learning, AI enabled innovation and future skills development.

“With a world class system and deep international partnerships, the UK is exceptionally placed to expand its global footprint and ensure that this country’s education continues to set the standard worldwide,” he added.

Education questions January 2026: Live blog

Welcome to FE Week live blog of education questions on January 19, 2026. The session will begin at around 2.30pm.

This is a new function we are testing following our decision to stop posting on the social media website X. 

Instead of live reporting key events via our social channels, we will host these blogs on our website, making it easier for our readers to see all updates in one place.

If you have feedback, please email news@feweek.co.uk

PeopleCert opens investigation into ‘conduct’ of City & Guilds execs

City & Guilds’ new owner PeopleCert has launched its own investigation into the conduct of the awarding giant’s top executives, FE Week has learned.

Greek-owned qualifications business PeopleCert said it has commissioned an internal inquiry “to fully understand events before and after” it bought the City & Guilds awarding business from the charity City & Guilds of London Institute in October.

PeopleCert said the investigation will be led by its legal representatives and non-executive board members, with its outcome to be confirmed “in due course”.

A spokesperson told FE Week the investigation will look at recent allegations of financial impropriety reported in the media.

This has included concerns about large bonuses the new owner paid executives shortly after the sale and questions about what information was shared with charity trustees and regulators.

It comes a day after City & Guilds staff were told that chief executive Kirstie Donnelly and finance director Abid Ismail would be “absent from work for a short period”, and a week after the Charity Commission opened a statutory inquiry into the “assurances” given ahead of the sale and trustees’ decision-making.

Exams regulator Ofqual has also told FE Week it is “monitoring developments” at the awarding business “closely”.

A spokesperson for PeopleCert said today: “As a responsible learning provider and partner, we take allegations of this nature extremely seriously.

“An internal investigation, led by our legal representatives and non-executive board members, has been commissioned in order to fully understand events before and after the sale by City & Guilds of London Institute (Charitable Foundation) of its awarding, assessment and training business (City & Guilds Limited), including the individual conduct of executives.

“We will confirm the outcome of this investigation in due course but cannot comment further on the specifics at this time.

“In the meantime, Kirstie Donnelly and Abid Ismail, CEO and CFO of City & Guilds Limited respectively, will be absent from work.

“Their responsibilities have been assumed by other senior leaders to ensure we continue to deliver the best possible experience for partners, customers and learners.”

Donnelly’s and Ismail’s duties will be covered by chief customer officer Andy Moss and PeopleCert’s vice president of finance Konstantinos Andrikopoulos.

Ofqual’s spokesperson said: “We are monitoring developments at City & Guilds Limited closely. Our priority is protecting students taking City & Guilds qualifications and ensuring they can have confidence in them.

“We have high and clear expectations of City & Guilds, in the interests of students.” 

PeopleCert said it has “notified” the relevant regulatory bodies about its investigation and will “cooperate fully” with the Charity Commission’s inquiry.

The company’s spokesperson added: “PeopleCert’s acquisition of City & Guilds followed a fully-intermediated, highly-competitive sale process, led by a reputable investment bank, in which PeopleCert was selected as the successful bidder, thanks to its scale, reputation, technology and track-record.

“For now, we remain entirely focused on supporting our learners and stakeholders across the public and private sector.”

Donnelly and Ismail have been approached for comment.

MOVERS AND SHAKERS: EDITION 519

Nikki Collier

Director of Business Development, Stanmore College

Start date: January 2026

Previous Job: Interim Head of Apprenticeship Performance, Capel Manor College

Interesting fact: Nikki loves driving old VW vans and is at her happiest behind the wheel of her “battered old caddy” singing along to Bob Marley’s ‘Is this Love’


Robert West

Associate Director – Impact and Influence, Education and Training Foundation

Start date: January 2026

Previous Job: Head of Education and Skills, CBI

Interesting fact: Rob began his education career as an actor-teacher with the Inner London Education Authority at the Cockpit Arts Workshop, the first purpose-built youth arts workshop and theatre


Paul Smith

Area Director – Yorkshire and the Humber, Association of Colleges

Start date: January 2026

Previous Job: Head of Quality, Standards and Statuses, Education and Training Foundation

Interesting fact: With a love of sports and the outdoors, Paul once completed a 100km charity-trek around North Yorkshire in under 24 hours

Disabled lecturer wins £177k discrimination payout

A former college lecturer has been awarded £177,000 in a tribunal battle over disability discrimination that included harassment by colleagues and false racism claims.

Dr Sharon Turton, who has asperger’s syndrome, severe complex post-traumatic stress disorder and ADHD, was a psychology teacher at MidKent College until she took voluntary redundancy in 2022.

Dr Turton left the college a year after issues emerged with a colleague, which began with “difficult social interactions” and escalated to the colleague mockingly telling students Dr Turton had “mental problems” while tapping her head.

College management also launched a formal investigation into allegations Dr Turton had made racist remarks about a student that the employment tribunal ruled were “fabricated” and an “attack on her reputation”.

Following the tribunal’s ruling that Dr Turton suffered harassment related to disability, direct disability discrimination and a failure to make reasonable adjustments, she was awarded £177,157.28 in compensation and legal costs of £12,465.15.

This included compensation for loss of earnings, injury to feelings, personal injury, aggravated damages, interest and tax.

Left feeling ‘broken’

The tribunal panel of one judge and two lay members said Dr Turton was a “committed and determined” lecturer of higher education access courses, who was “likely” to have stayed at work until she was 70, despite being signed off work for “significant periods” of 44 and 48 days in 2018 and 2021.

The psychology lecturer and her daughter said the discrimination had exacerbated the symptoms of her disability and left her “broken” and “fundamentally changed”.

A remedy judgment published on Wednesday said: “She was unable to come to terms with the loss of a job that she loved and cannot face going into or even near learning environments.

“She can barely bring herself to leave home, let alone seek work.”

Among Dr Turton’s settlement was a payout for past and future loss of earnings of £53,551.47 and £27,942.87 respectively.

The tribunal also awarded £29,000 in injury to feelings damages, the middle end of the compensation scale, ruling that the college’s decision to place her at risk of redundancy while she was signed off sick and had an open grievance against two other staff members made her feel “as if she had no choice”.

The disciplinary investigation was “exceptionally upsetting” as it damaged her reputation with colleagues, students and former students, the tribunal said.

Dr Turton said she now feared she would be “bullied and spoken to like she is an idiot” because she has autism and ADHD.

The tribunal also awarded her £8,000 for personal injury as the physical and mental health impact of her experience meant she had not been able to return to work after three years, and had a 50 per cent chance of returning to an equivalent role.

College rebuked

It also awarded aggravated damages of £5,000 because it felt the college was “simply not taking our findings seriously”, despite the “public nature” of the actions of two staff members, as it was yet to “take any action” against the staff members, even after the ruling was published.

Dr Turton told FE Week the college’s continued employment of two staff members implicated in the discrimination against her raised “serious questions” about MidKent College’s approach to disability, bullying and harassment.

She said she tried “everything in her power” to get help in the first nine months of discrimination, including begging management to intervene, but felt that only one staff member appeared “genuinely concerned”.

The lecturer added: “There were so many opportunities for the college to put a stop to what was happening.”

Simon Cook, principal and CEO at MidKent College, said: “We take these findings and the matters they discuss extremely seriously and are committed to ensuring that all staff and students experience an inclusive and respectful working and learning environment.

“The events referenced in the tribunal’s judgment occurred between 2021 and 2022, and a significant period has passed since then.

“Throughout this time, the college has continued to learn and grow, strengthening its policies and practices to foster a more inclusive workplace.

“The wellbeing of our staff remains a priority, and we are committed to reflecting on this case to ensure we maintain a culture of respect and support for all.”

HGV trainer’s route to an ‘exceptional’ grade

Ofsted released its first new-style inspection report cards this week. Anviksha Patel spoke with the boss of an ITP that was assessed, to learn what leaders can expect from the watchdog’s human-centred approach – and what’s needed to achieve the rare ‘exceptional’ grade

The first FE provider to achieve an ‘exceptional’ grade under Ofsted’s revamped inspection framework has revealed inspectors are laser-focused on evidence of sustained impact.

Carlisle-based independent training provider System People Limited was deemed ‘exceptional’ for its work with logistics-related skills bootcamp programmes, in an inspection outcome published this week.

Managing director Tony Higgins told FE Week that inspectors recognised his provider’s 30-year ties with employers in the area, its contribution to government priorities and its “transformational” impact on learners’ careers and employability prospects.

He also praised the watchdog’s communicative and open-door policy approach during its four-day inspection process, and inspectors’ priority of ensuring staff wellbeing.

“[I was] surprised how collaborative the whole thing was. It was noticeably different [to past inspections],” Higgins said.

Ofsted overhauled its inspection framework last year after Labour took power. Changes were also made amid heavy scrutiny of the watchdog’s approach following the death of school headteacher Ruth Perry.

Ofsted removed single-word judgments in favour of a five-point scale in 16 individual areas for FE and skills providers – including ‘inclusion’ for the first time.

Education providers are now awarded grades from ‘exceptional’, ‘strong standard’ and ‘expected standard’ to ‘needs attention’ and ‘urgent improvement’.

Ofsted’s baseline expectation is for providers to achieve the ‘expected standard’ grade.

Chief inspector Sir Martyn Oliver previously said the ‘exceptional’ grade would demonstrate exemplary practice nationally.

“Strong standard marks out excellent practice. Anything graded ‘exceptional’ is exactly that – truly among the very best nationally,” he said.

‘Step in the right direction’

During the November visit, most of System People’s learners were taking apprenticeships (345) while around 50 were on skills bootcamps. Most of its provision is in large goods vehicle driving and early years apprenticeships. It works with three subcontractors: Evri, JLD Driver Training and Viamaster Training.

The ITP received ‘exceptional’ in adult education achievements, ‘expected standard’ in four areas, as well as three ‘strong standard’ grades in curriculum and participation in bootcamps and apprenticeships achievement.

It was previously rated ‘good’ at its previous full inspection in 2021.

Higgins said his team was pleased with the inspection outcome but were initially disappointed by the ‘expected standard’ judgments as it was unclear to them what the grade meant.

“Actually, it is a difficult thing to achieve, especially with the ‘secure fit’ concept, which makes it more objective. I think it’s a step in the right direction”, he said.

Ofsted dropped the ‘best fit’ model it previously used to grade FE and skills providers in favour of a ‘secure fit’ model, which means each standard within each grade must be met before it can be awarded.

The watchdog has clarified that ‘expected standard’ is a “high bar” and inspectors will generally report on it positively, but there will be areas identified that “prevent” the ‘strong standard’ from being met.

When Higgins got the call, his first surprise, and biggest difference from last time, was inspectors arranging a planning meeting with senior leaders before arriving on site.

Higgins led the call, held in a Premier Inn, which lasted a couple of hours and demanded “a lot” of detail.

He said: “Inspectors wanted to know about what we did, how we did it, a quick overview of our data, what our strengths and weaknesses were, and those strengths and weaknesses were then used from the planning call to plan the first days of inspection.”

The six-strong inspection team examined the provider’s inclusion, achievement “in a big way” and safeguarding as soon as they knocked on the door, while simultaneously talking to employers, learners and staff.

Tony Higgins, managing director of System People

Higgins and his team consulted Ofsted’s FE and skills toolkit, which he found “very useful”, but they relied more heavily on the inspectorate’s handbook.

“I think if providers read all that documentation, it gives you everything you need to know, and it tells you exactly what, in our experience anyway, was followed to the letter.”

Regarding better communication from inspectors, a key commitment from Ofsted as part of its overhaul, Higgins was impressed.

“We felt it made life much easier. You really felt part of the team. Everyone was approachable. There was constant dialogue all the time and they kept us up to speed on where we were at,” he said.

“[I was] surprised how collaborative the whole thing was. It was noticeably different.”

If an inspector saw the provider was struggling to meet an ‘expected standard’, the team were nudged to talk about anything that would help them get there.

“We felt like they wanted us to do well and make sure at least that we could show our best bits and not lose anything to interpretation,” Higgins said.

Impact, impact, impact

Impact was a key focus of System People’s inspection.

In conversations with staff, learners and employers, Ofsted repeatedly asked what the impact of the ITP’s education provision was on them.

Skills bootcamps were introduced by the Conservatives in 2020, offering intensive training for 12 to 16 weeks followed by a “guaranteed” job interview.

Training providers are paid for bootcamps in three “milestone” instalments based on learners’ performance; the final is conditional on the achievement of positive outcomes, such as a new job.

System People has delivered large bootcamp programmes for the logistics sector for the last three years, with “high achievements” that triggered the ‘exceptional’ grade, Higgins said.

His explanation for achieving the rare grade was down to the firm’s deep relationships with local employers and “depth of understanding” of the sector.

“We have had relationships with them for years and years. We understand the challenges. We understand where the sector is going, how government policy is going to affect our sector, and then we look at the solutions for the employers to make them more profitable.”

Additionally, System People ensures there are jobs available with the employers they work with before getting learners to sign up to bootcamps.

“To train loads and loads of people to get an HGV licence, for instance, but you don’t have those outcomes, that’s just a waste of everyone’s time and money. It’s not just about people passing courses,” Higgins said.

System People’s Ofsted report confirmed his claim.

It said: “Training has a transformational impact on learners’ future careers and employability prospects, and on their employers’ businesses. For example, learners facing redundancy have rapidly gained the skills needed to secure employment in driving large goods vehicles.”

The report pointed out “exceptionally well” preparedness of large goods vehicle (LGV) apprentices and learners, adding that almost all progress into sustained employment.

System People reported a 74 per cent achievement rate in 2023-24, above the 61 per cent national average.

Higgins praised the move to an outcomes-based framework and said the removal of the single word judgment put “less stress” on an organisation but was “definitely more difficult” for marketing purposes.

His advice to providers in scope for an imminent Ofsted call: be ready to prove your sustained impact.