Ofsted Watch: Luton Sixth Form College slips from grade one

Luton Sixth Form College has become the latest FE provider to lose its prized grade one status.

It follows last week’s Ofsted Watch in which three other providers all fell from ‘outstanding’.

Inspectors said that progress mentors at grade two-overall rated Luton, which teaches over 2,500 learners, do not have the “information that they require” to provide the “swiftest possible support to enable more students to achieve their best”.

They added that students’ achievement on A-level science and maths is “too low and too few students achieve the grades of which they are capable”.

Teachers also do not “consistently challenge” the most able students to make the progress of which they are capable.

Governors, senior leaders and staff at the SFC, which was rated ‘good’ in all headline fields, were however praised for understanding the local community well.

“They use this information to develop a safe, supportive and harmonious working environment and an ambitious culture,” inspectors said.

They added that leaders and managers analysis of learners’ qualification outcomes is “very thorough”, and when they identify declining trends in achievement they take “swift action” to make improvements.

It was better news for two private providers: London Skills for Growth and MPower Training Solutions, who both hopped from a grade three to a two.

Based in Bexley, London Skills for Growth was applauded for improving its teaching, learning and assessment, as well as setting an “ambitious improvement strategy” and ensuring that staff are committed to it.

“Staff have remedied the key areas for improvement identified at the previous inspection,” inspectors said.

The board of trustees has also taken “bold and effective steps” to strengthen its partnership with local colleges, and in doing so, leaders and managers have “secured the long-term future of the organisation”.

Over at the Essex-based MPower Training Solutions, leaders were highlighted for setting personal development, behaviour and welfare at an ‘outstanding’ level.

Leaders and managers promote a “culture of tolerance and mutual respect,” inspectors said, adding: “Consequently, learners and apprentices develop an excellent awareness of a wide range of social and ethical issues they may face in their work and social lives.

“Learners and apprentices take pride in their work and enjoy their time at the training centre.”

It wasn’t such good news for fellow private provider JFC Training College, based in London, which was given a grade three in its first ever inspection.

“Senior leaders do not monitor the quality of provision effectively and do not have a full understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of teaching, learning and assessment,” Ofsted said.

VQ Solutions was also given a grade three, falling from a grade two.

Inspectors said leaders at the Harrogate private provider do not manage the performance of assessors well enough to improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment.

A ‘requires improvement’ rating was given to the UK’s largest hospitality company, Whitbread PLC.

Leaders at the employer provider, which provides intermediate, advanced and higher-level apprenticeships in hospitality and catering at their Premier Inn hotels and Costa outlets, do not use data “well enough” to check the progress that apprentices make.

Trainers and assessors also do not ensure that apprentices achieve as well as they can.

The Activate Learning Group, which has three main campuses of Reading College, City of Oxford College and Banbury and Bicester College teaching over 9,000 learners, maintained its ‘good’ grade following a full inspection in December.

Among a host of positives, inspectors highlighted governors and senior leaders for providing a “clear strategic direction, vision and mission”.

There were two short inspections, where providers also maintained their grade twos. These were had at the City Of Bradford Metropolitan District Council and The Sixth Form College Colchester.

One monitoring visit report was also published. This was the first for Easton & Otley College since its ‘inadequate’ report in July.

Inspectors said that too much teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement but leaders have responded “well” since the last inspection, particularly ensuring that safeguarding arrangements are effective.

 

GFE Colleges Inspected Published Grade Previous grade
Easton & Otley College 12/12/2017 23/01/2018 M M
Activate Learning 12/12/2017 22/01/2018 2 2

 

Sixth Form Colleges Inspected Published Grade Previous grade
Luton Sixth Form College 28/11/2017 23/01/2018 2 1

 

Independent Learning Providers Inspected Published Grade Previous grade
JFC Training College Ltd 05/12/2017 24/01/2018 3 N/A
London Skills for Growth Limited 12/12/2017 24/01/2018 2 3
MPower Training Solutions Ltd 21/11/2017 23/01/2018 2 3
VQ Solutions Ltd 06/12/2017 22/01/2018 3 2

 

Employer providers Inspected Published Grade Previous grade
Whitbread PLC 03/10/2017 26/01/2018 3 2

 

Short inspections (remains grade 2) Inspected Published
City Of Bradford Metropolitan District Council 06/12/2017 23/01/2018
The Sixth Form College Colchester 14/12/2017 25/01/2018

Multi-academy trusts fail to implement Baker clause

Just two of the 10 largest multi-academy trusts in England have fully complied with their new legal duty to allow training providers and colleges the chance to speak to pupils about technical qualifications and apprenticeships.

The Baker Clause, an amendment to the Technical and Further Education Act, came into force on January 2, and requires all schools to publish a policy statement on their websites.

An FE Week investigation has found that most large trusts have however failed to meet that duty.

In fact, of the 10 trusts investigated, only The Kemnal Academies Trust (TKAT) and Delta Academies Trust responded with a copy of their statements and proof they had published them on their schools’ websites.

Plymouth CAST had a document ready, but admitted it was only available from its trust homepage; the others were either in the process of formulating the documents or declined to respond to our requests.

Lord Baker, the former education secretary who forced the new law through, has written to the government demanding action.

Under the rules, every school is obliged to give training providers access to every pupil between years 8 and 13, so they can find out about non-academic routes.

According to the Department for Education’s statutory guidance, schools needed to have published “a policy statement setting out their arrangements for provider access”, which “should be made available on the school website”.

This must explain how to arrange access, which premises or facilities can be used, and the grounds for granting or refusing requests.

When Lord Baker prosed the changes in February last year he acknowledged the move was likely to be “met with great hostility in every school in the country”.

Nevertheless, he told FE Week this had been a “very, very poor start”.

“I am going to write to [academies minister] Lord Agnew about it. It’s really a matter for the government to chase them up,” he said, though he admitted he was “not surprised”.

“We know that many schools will try to resist this, but it’s very important that it should be implemented more rigorously.”

Robert Halfon, a former skills minister who now chairs the parliamentary education committee, has also pledged to write to Agnew, and said trusts “must get their act together”.

“Parliament has legislated for this requirement for a very good reason – it’s vital that more is done to promote technical education,” he said.

“I shall be writing to the minister to establish what efforts the Department for Education has made to ensure academies publish these policy statements, and what actions it intends to undertake to ensure academies up their game and comply with the law.”

A DfE spokesperson said “We brought in these reforms to make sure that all pupils are aware of the range of routes into the workplace so that they can make confident, informed decisions.

“We published statutory guidance for schools on 2 January, to coincide with this new duty coming into force, which made clear that schools have to provide opportunities for technical education and apprenticeship providers to talk to pupils, and to publish a statement of their plans on their website.

“We recognise this is a major change for schools, which is why we have allowed them time to prepare and ensure they can introduce it successfully.

“We will continue to work with schools, academy chains and representative groups, to make sure pupils are getting the advice they need, and schools are doing what they are obliged to do.”

Lauener pledges salary to student hardship fund

Peter Lauener will donate the £25,000 salary he will earn as chair of one of the UK’s largest college groups to a student hardship fund.

Apparently one of the busiest men in FE, the former boss of the ESFA and the Institute for Apprenticeships, who currently leads the Student Loans Company, bagged himself yet another job last week, this time as chair of NCG.

Taking up the position in the spring, he’ll replace Jamie Martin, who has held the role for 11 years.

The post is not remunerated, but Mr Lauener will earn a salary as he will also cover Intraining, NCG’s national independent training provider, which is a wholly owned subsidiary.

The former civil servant has however asked that the money is paid directly to a student hardship fund, a spokesperson for the group told FE Week.

He retired from his government roles in November last year, but became interim chief executive at the Student Loans Company after the sudden departure of Steve Lamey, and will stay in post until a permanent replacement is found.

“I am looking forward to taking up this new role at NCG and getting to know the different colleges and organisations in the group,” said the new chair.

“There is nothing more important than developing the skills of all our people and NCG has a critical role in supporting learners, businesses and communities.”

In his spare time, Mr Lauener is also the official delegate for Worldskills UK, and was a major force behind in the IfA last year as its first chief executive.

Before taking the reins at the ESFA, he helped implement the Youth Training Scheme, worked for the Manpower Services Commission in the 1980s, and set up the Training and Enterprise Councils in the 1990s.

“Peter has played a leading role in the shaping of education and training in the UK for some years now,” said Joe Docherty, NCG’s chief executive.

“He has steered a course for the Skills Funding Agency and the Education Funding Agency through a period of great political and economic change, and consequently made a positive impact on the education and training of people across the country.”

His predecessor Mr Martin is now the managing partner of law firm Ward Hadaway.

During his 11 years as chair he oversaw NCG’s expansion, and leaves it as one of the biggest college groups in the country.

The group now comprises Carlisle College, Kidderminster College, Lewisham Southwark College, Newcastle College, Newcastle Sixth Form College, and West Lancashire College. It also runs two training providers: Rathbone Training and Intraining.

Mr Martin said it had been a “great experience” to have been involved with NCG’s “expansion and growing success” and to have “seen the difference which it has made and continues to make to the career prospects and the lives of thousands of people not just in the north-east, but across the country too”.

Mr Lauener will start on March 1, 2018.

What now for the levy reforms?

Apprenticeship take-up since the introduction of the levy last May continues to slide, but whether this represents a longer-term problem is debatable.

The CBI calls it “alarming”, which, given it represents employers, will be uncomfortable for the government.

But if big employers are simply in the planning phase, as the skills minister suggests, the CBI has only got itself to blame.

It successfully lobbied to let levy credit sit unused in accounts for a full two years, longer than the government had originally planned.

Is it any wonder then that employers are in no rush to spend it?

Writing my editorial last October, after the first dramatic fall in apprenticeship starts were revealed, I predicted this was a temporary fall.

Anecdotal evidence is that many large employers, particularly in the public sector, are gearing up for huge recruitment in April, the start of their financial year.

These figures that won’t be made public for at least another seven months.

But as I’ve also said before, the problem isn’t likely to be quantity or even quality, it’s whether employer decisions are aligned to government priorities.

So keep an eye on 16- to 18-year-old starts, down 20 per cent between May and October.

Parents’ negative perceptions of apprenticeships aren’t the problem, something the skills minister has also said this week.

The problem for 16- to 18-year-olds will be employers lacking sufficient incentives to create vacancies for them.

 

Top providers turn to MPs for non-levy relief

Top training providers and colleges still denied non-levy contracts are turning to influential MPs in an effort to squeeze the cash they need from the government.

Exeter College, which FE Week rates as the best college in the country, and Hull’s HYA Training both appealed the ESFA’s decision not to fund their apprenticeships with smaller employers before Christmas.

These appeals were swiftly denied – even though the two providers are respectively rated grade one and two by Ofsted.

Determined not to give up, Exeter College has now turned to its influential local MP Ben Bradshaw (pictured above left), a former culture, media and sport secretary and shadow deputy prime minister, to take the battle to Whitehall.

HYA Training is meanwhile liaising with its own MP, Emma Hardy (pictured above right), who sits on the education select committee.

Mr Bradshaw has already written to Anne Milton about the damage the decision will cause if it is not overturned.

This lack of clarity only left everyone second-guessing

“It is inexplicable to me that the top-performing college in England, with an excellent record on delivering apprenticeships, has lost out in this way,” he told FE Week.

“Both Exeter College and local employers are aghast. I have written and spoken to the minister and officials in her department and at the ESFA to impress on them the importance of finding a solution to this problem and warned them that otherwise the provision of apprenticeships in the Exeter area will be seriously affected.”

Exeter College has an 81-per-cent overall apprenticeship achievement rate, well above the national average of 67 per cent.

“We are currently exploring all available options to resolve the present situation,” said a spokesperson.

Another high-profile organisation denied a contract in the non-levy tender was children’s charity Barnardo’s.

The provider is rated ‘good’ and has 30 years’ experience in delivering apprenticeships to the UK’s most vulnerable young people.

It appealed the decision before Christmas but Ms Milton stuck to her guns.

A spokesperson for the charity said it would continue to support vulnerable young people into apprenticeships with smaller non-levy employers by becoming a subcontractor to other organisations, “albeit with reduced funding”.

Patrik Knowles, the managing director of HYA, has sought legal advice, complaining that the non-levy tender was unfair and represented more of a lottery than a procurement process.

We remain hopeful that a satisfactory outcome will be reached

His provider, like Barnardo’s, passed the score criteria but fell below the £200,000 threshold the ESFA uses to apply its pro-rata methodology – a rule which applicants did not know about until the tender results were released.

This “lack of clarity only left everyone second-guessing”, Mr Knowles wrote in an article in last week’s FE Week.

Ms Hardy said the entire system of apprenticeship funding needs to be more transparent, and wants powers to be devolved to allow local commissioning.

Newcastle and Stafford Colleges Group, another ‘good’ provider denied a non-levy contract, is still in the midst of its appeal, and is “hugely encouraged” by the level of support it has garnered from its local MPs.

The college’s chief executive, Karen Dobson, said she remains “hopeful” that a “satisfactory outcome will be reached in due course”.

The much-delayed procurement process has tormented the sector all year and ended up causing huge controversy when results were released in December.

One of the most frustrating cases was revealed by FE Week when we found one organisation that had ceased trading in October was awarded a contract in the procurement.

A total of 714 providers were given allocations to use between January 2018 and March 2019, but 227, nearly a third, are on their first direct apprenticeships contract.

Sir Gerry Berragan, Chief executive, Institute for Apprenticeships

The new boss of the Institute for Apprenticeships is not giving anything away. After 37 years in the military, Sir Gerry Berragan seems more comfortable dealing in facts than stories about his life.

But this might be just the kind of discipline the organisation needs, after a year under a caretaker chief executive and a list of gripes from employers and providers as long as the Bayeux Tapestry.

To this end, the institute’s first official publication, issued shortly after Sir Gerry’s appointment in November, was a stroke of genius. The simple two-pager, ‘Faster and Better’ was all substance and no style, and promised to rationalise processes and accelerate decisions.

In short, if the IfA is aiming to project a much-needed new front of efficiency, it’s working. All that’s left now is to deliver.

I want to take on responsibility. I want to lead people

It has promised a fuller explanation of the new process in early February, designed, Sir Gerry avers, to “reduce the time and the pain that trailblazers go through in developing these things. Because I understand that they’re all busy people and they’ve got day jobs too.”

The new boss’s understanding reaches beyond empathising with employers, deep into the world of training and apprenticeships. Less than a decade ago he was in charge of training for the entire army, which is “probably one of the biggest providers of apprenticeships in the country”.

During his three years as the army’s director of recruiting and training, he oversaw the plan to map all its internal training, onto what he calls “civilian standards” such as NVQs or BTECs. As framework apprenticeships came in, they took a similar approach, so by “maybe seven years ago, about 85 per cent of people who joined the army as soldiers were on apprenticeships.”

These are the kind of facts the former adjutant-general is willing to share. But asking Sir Gerry about his own life feels a bit like trying to solve one of those puzzles on the Crystal Maze. There’s a list of details, both personal and professional, that he has decided he’s willing to divulge, but you don’t know what they are, or in which part of his 60-year life history they lie.

A service child himself – he’s a fourth-generation serviceman – he grew up all over the world, in so many places he claims he can’t remember exactly where and when. “I enjoyed my time in Malaya but I was probably between six and nine, I think,” he says, while Germany and Hong Kong were also in the mix.

So were there any places that left a particularly strong impression on him when traveling the world as a military kid? “Not really, no.”

He’s similarly quiet about what inspired him to join up, but admits that his itinerant childhood no doubt influenced his personality: “I do think that life gave you a degree of resilience, because you were moving, you were making new friends, you were sort of self-reliant from quite a young age.”

He applied to Sandhurst at 19, shortly after completing his A-levels. And while he denies that was a childhood ambition, he did know university wasn’t for him – he was too keen to “get out there and do something and have some adventures”. So after trying his hand at “all sorts of odd jobs,” he decided civilian life was too boring and joined up in 1979.

The difference between a non-graduate who decides to apply to the officer track, as he did, and one who joins the ranks is “a lot to do with willingness and preparedness to take responsibility. So if you go in as an officer you’re basically saying, ‘I want to take on responsibility. I want to lead people’.”

This statement of purpose seems an apt description of a man who has held command appointments in the army at pretty much every level all the way up to adjutant-general – which is only one rung from the top.

Having chosen a leadership path, that was indeed what he got: by 22 he was already training troops of 30 recruits, tasked with turning them from “civilians into soldiers” over about three months.

“That was tremendous fun, really seeing the transformation in those guys,” he recalls. “When they came through the door they wouldn’t look you in the eye, they’d shuffle their feet, they had their hands in pockets, and by the end they talked to anyone, they were confident – they just had an aura about them.”

Some of the recruits had no qualifications from school, and he found it satisfying to watch them grow in confidence as they passed their army exams. The experience obviously marked him, and remains part of why he has a passion for his current role.

Sometimes youngsters don’t see the point of some of the education they get at school

“I think sometimes youngsters don’t see the point of some of the education they get at school, whereas with vocational it’s got a reason and it leads to something tangible. And I think that’s why that’s always stuck with me,” he says.

Ten years later he passed the competitive staff college exams and was put onto an army fast-track, leading initially to a posting in the first Gulf War as a brigade chief of staff.

Over the next couple of decades, he moved up the ranks in postings across the UK and worldwide, including in Germany, Canada and Kenya, until, on returning from Baghdad at the end of 2007, he was handed what he describes as “a huge job” as director of recruiting and training. He attempts to provide an idea of the scale of the task. There were about 25,000 people working for him, and that was just the staff, on something like 30 sites, spread around the country.

While Sir Gerry’s personal area of expertise was gunnery, army training isn’t just about preparing troops for combat. Construction engineers, for example, receive basic training and combat engineer training before going on to become bricklayers, plasterers, plumbers, electricians, or even air-conditioning engineers.

The army is often required to build camps that are effectively entire towns, he explains, pointing to the famous Camp Bastion in Afghanistan.

“Back in 2005 it didn’t exist – it was a blank piece of desert, 20 miles from the nearest town. And within three years it was a town the size of Basingstoke with two hospitals, an international airport that was almost as busy as somewhere like Gatwick,” he recalls. “It had catering facilities, it had accommodation, it had drainage, it had water supplies, it had electricity supplies, you name it.”

After three years Sir Gerry became director of personnel, before rising 18 months later to the rank of adjutant-general, responsible for everything from recruiting and training to personnel, career management, the Sandhurst officer academy, and even schools for service children.

“In effect I had my own local education authority spread around Brunei, Germany and the Falklands,” he quips.

And then at the end of 2015, after 37 years’ service, he decided it was time to retire from the military, but insists he “never stopped enjoying it”.

I’m prioritising where I speak and who I go and see on the basis that I really need to be around here quite a lot of the time

After such a storied career, some might decide it was time to tend the allotment, but Sir Gerry soon began looking around “to see what things I could usefully do with my background and what could I contribute”. That’s when he saw the advert for the board at the Institute for Apprenticeships.

His experience made him a natural fit, but he was the only person from a public sector background on the board – most are employers, with a couple from FE and one from an independent training provider.

Unsurprisingly, perhaps, he has high praise for the IfA’s governance body: “I think it is fantastically diverse and really cohesive board. I was amazed at how they were all very accomplished in their own fields, and I think they’ve been a good sort of governance mechanism for the Institute as it has developed.”

After six months on the board, his decision to move from governor to chief executive wasn’t a given; in fact, he insists he wasn’t looking for a full-time job, and it wasn’t until the board’s recruitment committee had been through two unsuccessful rounds that he decided to put himself forward.

So what flicked the switch?

He describes a working dinner with the chair, the former Barclays chief executive Antony Jenkins, and fellow board member Dame Fiona Kendrick, who chairs Nestle UK, during which it began to dawn on Sir Gerry that he might be the person for this role.

The three were meeting in their capacity as the board’s strategy group, and Mr Jenkins was relating their trouble finding a suitable candidate. “That was a frustration,” explains Sir Gerry, “because we knew Peter [Lauener] was going to retire at the end of the year, there was a bit of an imperative to get someone in place.”

The group’s conversation turned to other matters, but an idea had begun to form in Sir Gerry’s head. Over the course of the two-hour meal, he mulled it over quietly, and then “at the end I said ‘look, you know, if it helps then I’ll throw my hat in the ring’. And that’s why I am where I am,” he concludes, matter-of-factly.

A “mini recruitment phase” followed, “to make sure everyone was happy”, including interviews with the chair and one of the other panel members, and also with skills minister Anne Milton, after which he was offered the job.

The somewhat unconventional way in which he was selected – without competing directly against other candidates – meant that he has been appointed only for a two-year period.

But in contrast to the IfA’s previous chief executive, Sir Gerry doesn’t see himself as a caretaker boss.

“I think two years is quite a long time,” he declares. “I think you can do quite a lot in two years.”

Mr Lauener, he points out, was appointed additionally to his role at the head of the Education and Skills Funding Agency, and “he was basically trying to do both jobs for most of that year”.

His successor, however, has “no other distractions”. “I’m on this full time,” he insists, though he’s equivocal on what happens after two years, when he would have to reapply: “Let’s see when that comes.”

You can do quite a lot in two years

Mr Lauener’s deputy, Michael Keoghan, who was in charge of much of the day-to-day running of the institute, has since left to pursue his “dream job” as chief economic advisor for the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. But the handover has been positive: “Luckily, we’ve had the best part of two months together and he’s been giving me a lot of really helpful, constructive advice.”

They won’t be hiring another deputy, in favour of a chief operating officer, whose appointment should leave the new boss more time in the field.

“At the moment I’m prioritising where I speak and who I go and see on the basis that I really need to be around here quite a lot of the time,” he explains. “Once I’ve got a chief operating officer in place I can get out more.”

Tomorrow is Sir Gerry’s 60th birthday, and it seems an appropriate moment to wish him all the best for the next phase of his professional life. By all appearances, at least, the IfA appears to be in steady hands.

What does Ofsted consider a good college curriculum?

Amanda Spielman cited Harlow College as having particularly good curriculum design at the AoC conference in the autumn – but what has it done that so impressed Ofsted? Its principal Karen Spencer explains

During 2017, Harlow College took part in an Ofsted survey visit, looking at the design of level two study programmes. The visit felt very different from an inspection: it was more of a professional conversation asking us to identify good practice, giving greater time, without judgements, for discussion.

We told Ofsted how we’d redesigned our level two engineering curriculum in consultation with local employers, and how we were using the same process for our new centre planned at Stansted Airport. They seemed impressed with our approach, which could be replicated by any college, whatever their local employer landscape, so we are happy to share it here.

Engage effectively with employers

We were aware that our students were arriving with some gaps, so we invited 30 local employers to join a forum to learn what they needed from them. We heard all of their complaints – it was useful therapy for them, and while it was hard for us to hear, the first part of any process is acknowledging the issue.

Employers were very keen to be involved and commit to placements, professional input and guaranteed job interviews

The employers made several requests, including more training in hand skills and five-days-a-week provision, which unsurprisingly caused sharp intakes of breath. Nevertheless, we set about identifying practical solutions; it was a genuine two-way process, as employers supported us.

Tailor provision to employer need

We compacted our engineering study programme so students attended five days each week until Christmas. Then they begin two blocks of six-week work placements.

The final part of the course is taken up with completing portfolios, employability skills training, interview techniques, and how to search for vacancies. Employers sponsor the programme, providing professional input to curriculum design, offering extended work placements and guaranteeing interviews for jobs (not a guaranteed job). We cobrand and badge the programmes as “pre-apprenticeships”.

Last year 94 per cent of young people from our programme progressed directly into an apprenticeship with a local employer. Our engineering apprenticeships have increased by 13 per cent and the numbers wanting to join the study programme this year have increased by 56 per cent.

Develop and maintain relationships

The consultation created goodwill. We found employers were very keen to be involved and commit to placements, professional input and guaranteed job interviews. In fact, since we redesigned our curriculum, we’ve even had employers fighting over our students to employ them as apprentices.

Ongoing relationship management is critical. We therefore decided to invest in business development expertise, someone who understands the curriculum and is an engineer by trade.

Invest in facilities tailored to your area

We wanted to make our students more work-ready, not only their hand skills but also by familiarising them with the kind of advanced machinery they would use in the workplace.

That’s why we built the Harlow Advanced Manufacturing and Engineering Centre with co-investment from the College, SELEP and Essex county council. Our state-of-the-art facilities allow students to design, rapidly prototype, manufacture and test with the latest CNC technology. We complement this with a small-scale R&D and production facility for employers, where they can batch-manufacture components.

This is provided at a competitive price on the understanding that students are involved in the process. For example, we worked with a lawnmower company to produce components that they would otherwise send to China for production. Our students have gained a real insight into the design and production process, and assisted in the development of a real product.

We think we were used as an example of good practice for two main reasons: our proactive work with employers and our use of the flexibilities of the study programme. We have dared to think differently and innovate – something that’s a challenge when there’s so much change already in the sector.

Karen Spencer is principal of Harlow College

Aspiring caterers undertake work experience with First Dates star Fred Sirieix

Two aspiring chefs have been completing work experience under the watchful eye of Fred Sirieix, star of the Channel 4 show First Dates.

Gabriel Innaccone and Joe Cheeseman (pictured), both 16, are first-year learners at London South East College’s hospitality, food and enterprise career college, and were sent on work placement at Galvin at Windows, the swanky Park Lane restaurant where Mr Sirieix (pictured centre) is general manager.

The Michelin-starred restaurant is situated on the 28th floor of the Hilton Hotel, and the learners have already been thrown in at the deep end, preparing meals in the kitchen with guidance from the restaurant’s chefs.

“As a product of a vocational education and training myself, I know just how an opportunity like this can be the basis of a very lucrative and rewarding career,” said Ben Hobson, the sous chef at the restaurant who supervised the pair.

“This line of work relies so much on your attitude, as well as having an eye for quality and detail. It means working very hard and be willing to listen, observe and learn. It also requires lots of determination.”

Annual conference for women leaders in FE will focus on unlocking talent

To celebrate International Women’s Day, the Women’s Leadership Network is hosting an annual conference on how employers and employees can identify their talents and achieve their full professional potential.

Four workshops will take place on themes including flexible working and board membership, and there will be a session led by Jackie Grubb, the principal of City of Westminster College, on mindfulness and wellbeing.

The venue

There will also be an interactive workshop on using social media to raise your professional profile, delivered by FE Week.

Taking place on March 8 at Morley College in London, the event is open to leaders and aspiring leaders from across the FE sector.

“It will be a chance to think creatively and strategically about how we can transform organisations so that they recruit and retain talent when they need it and how they need it,” explained Kathryn James, a member of the WLN. “Time will also be given to reflect on what we can do personally to be the best we can for ourselves and others, so that we all can use our innate talents for work and for wellbeing.”

Tickets can be bought from the ETF’s website, and 20 free places are on offer to women who work or study in the post-16 FE and training sector, and who are aspiring leaders. To find out more, click here.

FE Week are pleased to be supporting this event as the official media partner.