Revealed: £302m college condition allocations

An extra £20 million in post-16 capacity funding to help Leeds and Greater Manchester cope with “rising numbers” of 16- to- 19-year-olds in education has been announced today, as the government confirms how it is handing out £302 million to improve college buildings.

The Department for Education (DfE) said the funding will help repair colleges’ “leaky roofs, broken windows and dilapidated buildings” to ensure they can “continue to break down barriers to opportunity”.

It is six months since the funding was first announced at last October’s budget and the first condition allocation in two years, according to the government.

In a statement to Parliament, skills minister Jacqui Smith also announced an extra £10 million each for Leeds City Council and Greater Manchester Combined Authority “to support capacity for rising numbers of 16- to 19-year-olds expected in 2025-26”.

She said: “This additional capacity will ensure young people continue in their education and training spreading opportunities across the country.”

The funding

The £301,999,999.98 in further education college condition allocations (FECCA) will be shared out between England’s 179 college groups based on a methodology that takes into account learning hours last academic year, space requirements for each subject, modelled non-teaching space, residential space, local construction costs and total expected space.

While the methodology does include apprenticeship delivery, it excludes learning aims such as distance learning, higher education, T Level occupational specialisms or end-point assessments.

Large college groups such as NCG and Capital City College will receive more than £7 million each, while 48 smaller institutions such as Calderdale College and Capel Manor College will receive less than £1 million each (see full list of allocations below).

According to Smith, the £322 million package confirmed today is part of the DfE’s £6.7 billion capital allocation, confirmed in the autumn budget.

She added: “This is a 19 per cent real-terms increase from 2024 to 25 demonstrating the government’s commitment to protecting education priorities against a tough fiscal context.”

Eligible and ineligible costs

Spend guidance published alongside the FECCA allocations says colleges have the “discretion” to decide how funding should be spent towards “improving the condition and preventing deterioration” of buildings and grounds.

A spending deadline of March 31, 2028, has also been attached to the grant, with colleges encouraged to plan and deliver “as soon as possible”.

However, the grants cannot be used to fund expansion of premises or to purchase land, and should not be spent on assessing potential future projects if this would lead to a “backlog of condition improvement problems”.

While the money can be used for IT infrastructure that is in “poor condition”, including stripping out and replacing cables, it cannot be used for new equipment or software.

Colleges have also been told to prioritise meeting net zero targets, sustainability and energy efficiency.

Smith said: “Further education colleges are at the heart of our mission to grow the economy and train the next generation of skilled workers under our Plan for Change.

“But the college estate we inherited is simply not fit for purpose. 

“Today’s funding addresses these issues, allowing colleges to focus on what they do best: breaking down barriers to opportunity and inspiring the workforce of the future.”

Association of colleges deputy chief executive Julian Gravatt said: “This £302 million investment is significant and a crucial step towards ensuring that our colleges can maintain and improve their estates, providing a safe and conducive learning environment for students and staff.

“We are particularly pleased to see the government’s commitment to addressing the deterioration of college buildings and grounds.”

Gravatt also welcomed the DfE’s use of a formula to allocate the funding “for the first time in 20 years”.

Mayor boost for some cities

Leeds City Council welcomed the funding as a “major boost” in its efforts to provide enough learning space for students amid what Luminate college group’s principal calls a “capacity crisis” due to a population bulge, a shortage of spaces on courses, and a lack of strategic planning.

The city expects its 16- to- 19-year-old population to continue rising until 2030, to just under 30,000 people.

Councillor Helen Hayden, executive member for children and families, said: “The pressures we face are not unique to Leeds, with all core cities nationally grappling with similar challenges, but we remain committed to finding a solution.

“To that end, we have made great strides so far to address the pressing need for further places, working closely with FE providers, community stakeholders and the Department for Education.  

“This £10 million additional funding is a major boost in helping us to provide the physical spaces and learning environments needed to enable more students to continue their education and enjoy the best possible opportunities here in Leeds.”

Colin Booth, chief executive of Luminate Education Group, called the £10 million in funding for Leeds a “positive development” that could go “some way” in tackling rising numbers of young people not in education, employment or training.

He added: “Over recent years, post-16 capacity constraints in Leeds have resulted in growing numbers of young people being unable to access suitable forms of post-16 education.

“Today’s announcement represents forward-thinking investment that could benefit both the local economy and young people right across the city.”

However, he warned that funding should be “targeted” at growing capacity for high demand courses such as level 1 and 2, and some technical courses such as health and care, rather than local sixth forms and A-levels.

He said: “In Leeds, there is an oversupply and competition between, sixth forms for A-level students.

“But in the most disadvantaged postcodes of Leeds, fewer than half of 16-year-olds are able or want to study A-levels.”

Gravatt added: “With 16 to 18 student numbers having risen by 7 per cent this year and forecast to rise by 5 per cent nationally, the government needs a plan for technical education growth.

“The funds for Leeds and Manchester will help but there are pressures in other cities and towns across the country.”

Further Education College Condition Allocations announced today 

Provider nameAllocation
NCG£7,555,502.94
Capital City College£7,391,320.54
New City College£5,861,633.26
Chichester College Group£5,216,864.85
HRUC (Harrow, Richmond & Uxbridge Colleges)£4,571,725.41
Luminate Education Group£4,277,801.33
Activate Learning£4,188,176.34
South Thames Colleges Group£3,979,320.51
Bedford College£3,961,219.53
Nottingham College£3,813,156.90
Exeter College£3,605,425.46
Newham College of Further Education£3,378,156.47
LTE Group£3,159,807.60
EKC Group£3,119,951.90
Sandwell College£3,046,994.97
City of Sunderland College£3,036,150.45
United Colleges Group£2,989,412.78
TEC Partnership£2,892,520.30
The Sheffield College£2,880,549.97
West Nottinghamshire College£2,863,288.30
West Herts College£2,851,718.78
Barnet and Southgate College£2,735,182.61
Newcastle and Stafford Colleges Group£2,619,198.86
East Sussex College Group£2,559,455.81
South and City College Birmingham£2,430,673.58
South Essex College of Further and Higher Education£2,426,969.56
Salford City College£2,413,150.88
Inspire Education Group£2,398,063.10
Derby College£2,374,476.76
Norwich City College of Further and Higher Education£2,356,653.99
The Trafford and Stockport College Group£2,354,139.57
DN Colleges Group£2,352,725.27
City of Portsmouth College£2,337,544.29
Loughborough College£2,312,121.34
Middlesbrough College£2,309,076.55
The City of Liverpool College£2,305,918.63
Birmingham Metropolitan College£2,279,243.53
Barnsley College£2,228,601.42
South Hampshire College Group£2,207,150.54
Leicester College£2,205,344.80
Solihull College & University Centre£2,196,589.99
Cheshire College – South & West£2,182,061.44
London South East Colleges£2,171,653.60
Bridgwater and Taunton College£2,167,449.46
Dudley College of Technology£2,162,122.72
Blackpool and the Fylde College£2,143,871.64
Truro and Penwith College£2,102,964.77
Walsall College£2,094,754.65
Hartpury College£2,082,090.16
North Kent College£2,080,003.50
Windsor Forest Colleges Group£2,075,288.50
Heart of Yorkshire Education Group£2,040,194.71
Wigan and Leigh College£1,992,454.52
South Gloucestershire and Stroud College£1,991,638.07
Colchester Institute£1,960,835.08
Bradford College£1,952,883.40
Northampton College£1,925,661.59
Havant and South Downs College£1,896,594.20
Oaklands College£1,895,551.75
Cornwall College£1,886,773.70
City of Wolverhampton College£1,878,646.14
New College Swindon£1,837,955.81
Halesowen College£1,823,014.19
West Suffolk College£1,819,223.23
Warwickshire College Group£1,815,020.90
Waltham Forest College£1,802,163.27
Sparsholt College Hampshire£1,787,223.98
City of Bristol College£1,774,733.55
Kirklees College£1,769,919.73
Cambridge Regional College£1,766,758.13
York College£1,757,466.76
New College Durham£1,756,550.45
Lincoln College£1,749,430.71
MidKent College£1,738,647.27
Wiltshire College and University Centre£1,734,133.69
Runshaw College£1,733,469.00
Gateshead College£1,716,380.53
Burnley College£1,690,301.41
Croydon College£1,665,082.55
RNN Group£1,659,896.39
City College Plymouth£1,648,690.96
Weston College£1,643,226.85
Bolton College£1,614,858.18
Gloucestershire College£1,607,086.48
Bury College£1,606,683.93
Preston College£1,597,841.04
The Bournemouth and Poole College£1,592,337.52
South Bank Colleges£1,562,931.59
Tameside College£1,527,057.02
Myerscough College£1,523,694.00
Hopwood Hall College£1,521,206.50
Nelson and Colne College£1,511,500.77
Blackburn College£1,503,291.07
Barking and Dagenham College£1,498,564.67
Milton Keynes College£1,470,772.37
East Surrey College£1,418,411.08
Riverside College Halton£1,408,301.21
South Devon College£1,392,127.61
Hull College£1,390,938.74
Reaseheath College£1,385,478.00
USP College£1,369,323.31
Brockenhurst College£1,362,524.38
Harlow College£1,355,731.15
Coventry College£1,352,714.97
Ealing, Hammersmith and West London College£1,348,071.40
Chesterfield College£1,342,129.75
The Oldham College£1,314,421.37
The Education Training Collective£1,308,869.13
Buckinghamshire College Group£1,291,856.33
St Helens College£1,270,594.08
South Staffordshire College£1,248,099.40
North Warwickshire and South Leicestershire College£1,239,660.71
Bishop Burton College£1,222,305.19
East Coast College£1,218,589.15
Suffolk New College£1,202,352.94
The College of West Anglia£1,177,945.52
Herefordshire, Ludlow and North Shropshire College£1,162,670.12
Heart of Worcestershire College£1,157,331.97
Moulton College£1,152,975.15
Wirral Metropolitan College£1,152,649.57
Tyne Coast College£1,121,357.57
Warrington and Vale Royal College£1,111,718.07
West Thames College£1,087,296.88
Abingdon and Witney College£1,085,927.92
Hertford Regional College£1,068,211.18
Farnborough College of Technology£1,062,333.94
Chelmsford College£1,052,519.18
Hugh Baird College£1,049,272.36
North East Surrey College of Technology£1,030,014.85
Bath College£1,012,757.75
Telford College£1,004,813.49
Calderdale College£999,585.98
Stoke-on-Trent College£990,329.88
The SMB Group£961,438.13
North Hertfordshire College£944,745.50
Morley College London£924,595.30
Boston College£903,236.01
Askham Bryan College£891,724.23
Petroc£867,455.28
Southport Education Group£858,839.95
Yeovil College£851,694.19
Plumpton College£844,731.42
Weymouth and Kingston Maurward College£842,771.90
Burton and South Derbyshire College£842,471.05
Darlington College£834,170.76
City Lit£820,089.09
Kendal College£816,829.60
Stanmore College£810,891.36
Hartlepool College of Further Education£790,990.87
Leeds College of Building£786,854.45
East Durham College£751,754.62
The Isle of Wight College£745,492.80
Workers’ Educational Association£715,420.88
Brooklands College£668,750.79
Basingstoke College of Technology£663,449.25
Lakes College – West Cumbria£610,361.86
Macclesfield College£591,966.58
Craven College£544,605.58
Derwentside College£538,377.41
Lancaster and Morecambe College£529,144.06
Newbury College£506,958.36
Capel Manor College£495,734.23
WM College£493,066.54
Strode College£478,869.08
Richmond and Hillcroft Adult and Community College (Rhacc)£471,309.91
Furness College£470,320.73
Shipley College£437,287.96
Bishop Auckland College£361,003.98
Grantham College£340,183.88
The Northern School of Art£276,896.22
Writtle College Limited£273,481.84
Northern College for Residential Adult Education Limited£253,462.99
Hereford College of Arts£244,485.84
The Mary Ward Centre (AE Centre)£180,121.47
Ada National College for Digital Skills£108,256.08
Hereward College of Further Education£102,955.98
Fircroft College of Adult Education£41,959.99
Ruskin College£31,025.31
The Marine Society College of the Sea£3,967.62

Source: DfE

AI tool for electronics teaching developed by ex-IfATE board member

A new “tick less and talk more” AI tool designed to help FE teachers assess electronics practical work is set to launch this year.

The tool, Elecafa.AI, is a teachers’ “buddy” that has been trained to visually assess soldering work on circuit boards and provide “constructive feedback”. 

It promises to “significantly reduce assessment lead times”, freeing up more time for teachers to focus on teaching and “authentic curriculum and assessment design”, according to tender documents.

Elecafa.AI consists of a microscope with a camera and a computer application, students show it circuit boards they have soldered and it provides feedback on the quality of each joint “in under a second”, including reasoning, an overall score, and advice on how to improve.

Assessing students’ soldering work on vocational courses involving electronics – such as BTECs, T Levels and Higher Technical Qualifications – can take a teacher “minutes” for each board, said Jessica Leigh Jones, co-owner of iungo Solutions, which created Elecafa.AI.

Speaking to FE Week, Leigh Jones, who previously sat on the board of the Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (IfATE), said: “Learners can use it as a simple self-service tool to gain instant formative feedback and work – and teachers can use it for the same thing.

“Unlike most AI which are computer based or large language models looking at numeracy and literacy, we’re looking at physical and practical types of work. We’ve developed it to look at electronics specifically, that’s why it’s called ‘Elecafa’.

“Essentially, we’re looking at soldering activity, a really essential tool that’s that taught in schools. Often you have quite small classes because they need a lot of support.

“It’s really important to just say, this is in no way intended to replace the teacher. This is about speeding up mundane tasks to really allow the teachers to spend more time with learners in their class, or workshop in this case.”

Elecafa.AI was funded in November with £69,695 from the Department for Education (DfE) through Innovate UK, which ran a procurement competition offering £50,000 to £200,000 from a £1 million fund for tools which use AI to support teachers with assessment and feedback.

Leigh Jones said iungo Solutions has one month left to “refine” the product before making it the app, circuit boards, components and microscope kit available for schools and colleges to buy.

She added: “We’ve done lots of piloting, we’ve had a range of schools soldering with them and trying them out.

“We’ve seen it works, but it’s probably going to take a year or two of data to see what those benefits look like.”

An “attractive” part of the deal for the company was that the government would grant fund early development of the tool, which was built “from scratch”, while iungo Solutions retains intellectual property rights.

The tool also draws its ability to provide pedagogical advice and feedback from the government owned ‘education content store’, which contains a quality-assured library of educational content and code available to train AI models.

The £3 million content store was announced in August last year with the hope of generating accurate, high-quality content, such as lesson plans and workbooks that can reliably be used in schools and colleges.

Leigh Jones, who co-founded iungo Solutions with Tom de Vall, is a former non-executive director of the IfATE and interim chair of Welsh awarding organisation WJEC.

She stepped down from IfATE in 2023 to mitigate a potential conflict of interest after iungo Solutions won a contract to provide skills bootcamps.

She said: “I did GCSE electronics in school, at the time one of only ten percent of schools in Wales that offered it and it set me up on my career path.

“But the number of schools offering it in Wales is getting smaller every year, so this is really positive.”

Education secretary Bridget Phillipson said: “Artificial Intelligence presents a truly transformative opportunity to modernise education.

“I’m determined to seize this opportunity with both hands – our children’s education is far too important not to benefit from advances that are already delivering remarkable results across society, from helping police identify criminals to improving cancer screening in our NHS.

“These tools show just how far AI can go in our classrooms – not replacing teachers with robots, but freeing up valuable time for those vital student interactions.

”My ambition is for every teacher in the country to be using AI to deliver a world-class education in the next few years, boosting standards and helping us deliver our Plan for Change.”

WorldSkills UK names squad for Shanghai 2026

WorldSkills UK has listed 86 students and apprentices as candidates for the official team that will participate in WorldSkills Shanghai next year.

Squad UK was selected from regional and national finals across 31 different skills and will now undergo 18-month intensive training programme to prepare them for selection for the ‘skills Olympics’ in 2026.

Melody Cheung, graphic design squad member

The squad announced today, full list below, will be guided through their training by a team of highly skilled trainers, industry experts, former medal winners and performance coaches to help them prepare for the pressure of competing at such a high level. 

The best and brightest will be announced as official members of Team UK next spring ahead of the 48th WorldSkills finals in China.

Next year’s competition will finally be held for the first time in Shanghai, China after the 2022 event, which was supposed to be held in the country, was cancelled due to ongoing Covid restrictions.

The event will see 1,500 young people travel to Shanghai from over 80 countries to compete in technical skill disciplines from engineering, manufacturing and technology through to creative, digital and hospitality in front of a quarter of a million expected visitors.

The UK will be competing in over 30 skills at WorldSkills Shanghai 2026, including 3D digital game art, robot systems integration and renewable energy. 

Ahmed Shakir, joinery squad member

The Squad UK members for competitions for cloud computing, logistics & freight forwarding and software testing have not yet been announced. The contenders will be selected at assessment events held in the coming months as WorldSkills UK does not have national competitions in these skills, yet.

The UK came in 11th place for total medal points at WorldSkills Lyon last year out of the 60 participating countries, and 10th for average point score.

Ben Blackledge, WorldSkills UK chief executive, said: “We are so excited to welcome this fantastic group of young technicians on to our international programme. They will be developing the skills that employers are crying out for which will fuel business growth across our economy.

“WorldSkills Shanghai 2026 will be bigger than ever before with even higher standards, giving us a vital platform to learn from the very best in the world and bring skills excellence to more young people across the UK.”

Finn Gallagher, web design squad member

Meet the squad

Melody Cheung, who is competing in graphic design and attends Bridgend College, was still in shock when interviewed at the WorldSkills UK Bootcamp.

She said: “It’s so exciting to be in squad, it doesn’t feel real yet,” she said. “I know the experience will boost my career opportunities – it’s such a great thing to put on your CV.”

Joinery apprentice Ahmed Shakir, also Bradford College alumni, said he was put forward by his employer, Abrahams & Carlisle.

“They value the training and know it will make me stand out as a joiner,” he said.

“Next month, I’m off to Wales for a training week so we are straight into it, and I can’t wait.”

Meanwhile, mechatronics competitor Emily Bettridge, an apprentice with Toyota Manufacturing UK, told FE Week she was entered into the competition by her manager, Sam Hillier, a former Team UK member at WorldSkills Abu Dhabi 2017.

Emily Bettridge, mechatronics squad member

She said: “It is fantastic to be selected for Squad alongside my teammates Liz and Joe who are also apprentices at Toyota. We have been working for this, for the last year so it feels like a great achievement. Toyota has a strong track record in entering WorldSkills UK competitions and when we found out we had been selected they sent the news round the company, which was great.”

Finn Gallagher, who has a BTEC in Software Design and attends Cardiff University will compete in Web Design. 

Gallagher said he never thought he would make it this far.

“There is a lot of new things to learn and I’m meeting so many great people. My university advertised the WorldSkills UK Competitions, and I put my name forward as I knew it would help me stand out when looking for jobs. The thought of travelling to China to compete is very exciting and I’m determined to give it my all.” 

FE Week is the media partner for WorldSkills UK and Pearson is the sponsor for Team UK.

See the full list here.

‘Back door devolution’ as 11 councils get extra procurement powers

Ministers have been accused of “devolution through the back door” after quietly launching plans to hand more adult education funding powers to local councils.

Under a pilot scheme starting in September, funding that would normally be procured through the Department for Education’s national adult education budget for non-devolved areas will be handed to 11 local authorities.

However, some councils were surprised to learn they had been named in the DfE’s pilot list, seen by FE Week, and suggested there had been “some confusion.”

One said it was “seeking further clarity” from the government this week.

News of the pilot emerged earlier this month in a DfE update sent to training companies with national adult skills fund contracts, warning that training delivered in the 11 local authority areas would “not be fundable,” as the local councils would be “in receipt of funding directly from [academic year] 2025-26.”

Officials claimed they did not need to announce the plans publicly, despite some local authorities being made aware as early as January, as the extra funding would be distributed through a “business-as-usual allocations process.”

The local authorities listed for the pilot are: Devon County Council, Torbay Council, Lincolnshire County Council, North East Lincolnshire Council, North Lincolnshire Council, Hull City Council, East Riding of Yorkshire Council, Warwickshire County Council, Buckinghamshire Council, Norfolk County Council, and Suffolk County Council.

Devolution through the back door?

The DfE denies the pilot is a form of devolution, but confirmed it is testing the theory that local areas could be better positioned than central government at identifying and addressing local skills needs.

A spokesperson told FE Week it wants to support local areas to prepare for devolution by building experience of a wider adult skills fund offer than councils may currently deliver.

It is a sign that the government is keen to speed up devolution of skills budgets, beyond timelines agreed by the last government and frameworks set out in Labour’s English devolution white paper.

But the move has led to complaints of “devolution through the back door” and warnings that additional complexity in the commissioning landscape “impacts deliverability.”

About 60 per cent of the £1.4 billion adult education budget was devolved to mayoral authorities this academic year.

This was due to increase to about 70 per cent in the next academic year – as East Midlands, Cornwall, and York and North Yorkshire gain control of their skills budgets.

Simon Ashworth, deputy CEO of the Association of Employment and Learning Providers, called for “more transparency” about the pilot as “it feels a bit like we’re getting more devolution through the back door.”

He told FE Week: “While a phased transition to devolution isn’t necessarily a bad idea, this latest move only adds more fuel to the argument that the post-16 skills landscape is already too complex.”

“This complexity impacts deliverability, making life harder for providers who are trying to plan and deliver high-quality provision.”

Leaders not aware

While plans appear to have been set in motion in areas such as Lincolnshire and Hull/East Yorkshire, which are both due to elect combined authority mayors in May, others appeared surprised that they were listed in the DfE update.

A spokesperson for Buckinghamshire Council said “there may have been some confusion” as the council did not expect changes to its adult skills funding before 2026-27.

They added: “To stress, no acceleration of the current devolution plans has been actioned.”

A spokesperson for Warwickshire County Council also said its officials were seeking “further clarity” from the DfE and had not made “arrangements” for taking control of funding locally.

Sue Pember, policy director at adult education network Holex, said the pilot was “sensible and pragmatic” given the government’s desire to devolve skills “at pace.”

She added: “The alternative – requiring providers to navigate dual systems – would add unnecessary complexity.”

“Local authorities already hold significant commissioning experience, with many managing skills contracts, careers services and programmes like the DWP’s new Connect to Work initiative.”

“This positions them well to oversee and coordinate local training provision effectively.”

Bootcamp provider in whistleblower probe collapses

A rail industry skills bootcamps provider suspended from recruiting new learners two months ago has gone bust.

Redstone Training called in administrators earlier this week after Liverpool City Region Combined Authority and the West Midlands Combined Authority terminated their railway skills bootcamps contracts worth a combined £3 million.

In January, Network Rail had asked rail regulator the National Skills Academy for Rail (NSAR) to investigate a number of rule-breaching allegations brought against the company.

Managing director of Redstone Training, Matthew Brooks, blamed the NSAR probe and subsequent suspension of skills bootcamps payments for the company collapsing into administration.

He told FE Week the combined authorities were “very happy” with their bootcamps provision last year and claimed they had not provided any evidence of Redstone’s wrongdoing.

Brooks said WMCA did a full audit of its provision in October, which went “extremely well” and offered Redstone £300,000 on top of its £1.65 million contract. Similarly with LCRCA, Brooks said officials came in “as and when” to do in-person audits as the company had a training centre in Liverpool.

“We finished 2024 with a happy combined authority,” he said. “They said they don’t envisage their funding allocation for the next wave of funding to be that different, and therefore to keep going.”

A whistleblower complaint that triggered the NSAR probe, and combined authority suspensions, was the start of the company’s downfall, the boss said.

Brooks claimed he still doesn’t know what the allegations are because Network Rail “are not allowed to share” them.

When asked to respond to claims that the allegations related to ineligible milestones two and three data, which involves job interviews and work-related outcomes for participants, Brooks said: “As we sit here today, two and a half months on, not one combined authority has come back to me and said, ‘you’ve done this wrong’. This isn’t right. We’ve had zero clawback.”

“Our process followed the rules,” he said, adding that the company had “only been paid based on evidence that has been checked, verified and approved”.

“Bootcamps have been built in order to stop rogue training providers who, over the years, draw down large amounts of money and shut the business and bugger off to the Caribbean,” Brooks said.

He told the combined authorities that withholding payments was “cutting our arms off”, and he claimed he had lost thousands of pounds by taking out a personal loan to pay the February payroll.

“That’s the type of guy I am. I’m not one of these cowboys who just treat people like dirt. That’s not me at all, and that’s not the business,” he said.

Redstone continued to deliver bootcamps for learners for another month despite no payments coming in until the company could no longer pay staff or suppliers.

“The problem is we’re a small business, and the minute you turn off our cash flow, there’s only so long we can continue. So we got to the end of February, and I didn’t know what March looked like,” he told FE Week.

He voluntarily appointed administrators from Begbies Traynor Group to help collect funds to pay off what the business owed.

Around 24 staff have reportedly been laid off. One former worker said they hadn’t been paid correctly in January or February.

Redstone Training was incorporated in 2017 and delivered a range of courses for budding rail workers.

The company came into scope for Ofsted inspection when it moved into the skills bootcamps market and was found to be making “significant progress” in two of three areas in an early monitoring report published last July. There were, however, only 24 learners on programmes at the time of the inspection.

LCRCA confirmed Redstone had 183 learners enrolled on wave-five rail bootcamps, “most of whom had completed prior to the NSAR registration withdrawal” and the rest have been transferred. WMCA said it had 115 learners enrolled with Redstone Training.

A LCRCA spokesperson said: “We have now terminated all contracts with Redstone. All financial matters will be dealt with through the administrator and therefore we will not comment further at this time.”

Responding to whether he would set up another rail training company, Brooks said “no”. 

“There’s been so much nonsense posted around me and the business over the last few weeks, and it’s all absolute nonsense,” he added.

WMCA and NSAR declined to comment.

Attending to the problem

While the Covid pandemic forced students out of classrooms, it seems that five years later colleges are still struggling to get them back in.

Ninety per cent is widely perceived as the minimum acceptable attendance level for learners to maintain.

But anonymised attendance data exclusively shared with FE Week shows that, instead of bouncing back after Covid, attendance at general FE colleges dropped from 90.3 per cent in 2020-21 (when classes were held remotely) to below 89 per cent for every academic year since.

According to a survey by the National Association for Managers of Student Services (NAMSS), attendance and punctuality were the most common types of challenging behaviour that got worse in colleges in the past year, cited by 52 per cent of 63 college respondents.

However, colleges are also fighting tooth and nail to reverse the trend – by ramping up involvement with parents, bolstering enrichment and pastoral support and even offering students vouchers for showing up.

Depressing data

Attendance fell in the three years to 2023-24 across age groups. But there was a particularly steep drop for adult learners who, because of the cost-of-living crisis, were often working more to make ends meet.

Data from FE software provider VLE Support covering 40,000 students shows that for 16 to  18 year olds, attendance fell from 91 per cent in 2020-21 to 89 per cent. For 19 to 23 year olds the drop was 92 to 90 per cent, and for those 24 and older the decline was 93 to 89 per cent.

Department for Education data shows attendance is even worse in school sixth forms. Last year attendance across years 12 and 13 hit 88.5 per cent, its lowest level since lockdowns, and 0.9 percentage points lower than for year 11.

In contrast, overall attendance in secondary schools rose by 0.1 percentage points last year to 91.1 per cent.

Sixth formers also had record levels of persistent absence. Over one-third (37 per cent) missed 10 per cent or more of lessons compared to 29 per cent of year 11s.

Meanwhile, A-level attendance for 16 to 18 year olds has also dropped in general FE colleges – by almost four percentage points since 2020-21 to 91.6 per cent last year.

Diane Booth, vice principal of West Nottinghamshire College, told a meeting last year that its 1.2 per cent drop in year 13 A-level attendance was “linked to some students preferring to study at home rather than in college, once the exams have commenced” although doing so was “not supported by the college”.

‘Disengaging’ from maths and English

It will come as no surprise to college leaders that English and maths GCSE retake classes have the worst attendance rates of all. A 2023 Association of Colleges survey found almost a quarter of learners were missing classes.

Ofsted reports frequently reference poor attendance in those subjects, with construction and hairdressing courses also commonly highlighted as problematic.

Tuition charity Get Further’s interim CEO Dr Alice Eardley says the problem springs from English and maths cohorts often having “complex support needs”, with many having “negative prior experiences of education”, and resit students needing better support to drive progress and reengagement.

But from September, colleges must deliver 100 hours of teaching for maths and English during the academic year as a condition of funding – which could worsen attendance figures further.

The government has just axed a requirement for adult apprentices to do functional skills. But adult attendance on maths and English functional skills courses in colleges has been better than for younger cohorts – at 89 per cent for each subject since Covid, compared to 87 for maths and 86 per cent for English for 16 to 18s.

T Level attendance has also waned, from 98 per cent when they were piloted in 2021-22 to 94 per cent last year.

Muddled measures

Building a clear picture of college attendance is tricky. Unlike schools, there is no national benchmarking system or agreed guidelines for authorised and non-authorised attendance.

Some colleges capture attendance at every lesson, others measure it once a day. And consistency within groups isn’t guaranteed either.

For example, in June Trafford & Stockport College Group reported English and maths attendance of just 62 per cent. But it said attendance for the hubs it launched for those subjects – which are “used ad hoc as an additional support measure” – was “good”.

Furthermore, suspended and excluded students are not included under absence data.

NAMSS chair Lisa Humphries

Why are learners not turning up?

NAMSS chair Lisa Humphries believes the biggest contributor to absenteeism is more students perceiving they are anxious, which becomes “a reason not to do things and facilitates them becoming more disconnected”.

She believes poor attendance is a “symptom of the issues young people are facing in society”, including being “over-stimulated with technology” and exposed to unchecked, extreme views.

In a 2023 Association of Colleges survey of 68 colleges, nearly 90 per cent cited poor mental health as the main reason for absenteeism, up from around 50 per cent in 2019.

That same year, an NHS report suggested 22 per cent of 20 to 25 year olds and 23 per cent of 17 to 19 year olds had a mental disorder, up from 10 per cent in 2017. The rate was twice as high for females.

The absence rate is higher for female sixth formers, research last year by ImpactEd found, but in FE colleges the gender split is fairly equal.

Colleges have witnessed a spike in mental health referrals since Covid. Salford City College reported a fivefold increase over the five years to 2023, and a “significant increase” in safeguarding incidents.

Heart of Yorkshire Education Group’s last published accounts reported a “significant legacy from Covid-19” in terms of behaviour and mental health, “consistent” with information from its partner feeder schools and other FE providers.

Leeds College of Buildings’ Rob Holmes

Relentless efforts

Last year, level 2 electrical student Carl (not his real name) was skipping more classes than he turned up for at Leeds College of Building – his attendance was 47 per cent.

His “chaotic homelife, police run-ins and ongoing mental health challenges resulted in behavioural issues and disruptive behaviour throughout his school life”, says the college’s vice principal of curriculum, quality and innovation Rob Holmes.

Fortunately, Leeds is one of many colleges to prioritise attendance, partly in response to a March 2024 Ofsted inspection that flagged attendance as “too low”.

A monitoring visit this year praised the college for being “relentless in tackling poor attendance” through a “less punitive approach” which was helping students on entry-level and level 1 courses make “substantial improvements”.

Following parental and staff meetings, target setting, extensive coaching, meetings with safeguarding and police contacts and interventions from cultural agencies, Carl’s attendance rose to 82 per cent. His behaviour and mental health have improved too. 

Efforts to tackle absenteeism appear to be sector-wide. Most Ofsted observations about attendance between 2022 and the start of 2024 were negative. Since then, reports have frequently cited the huge efforts colleges are making.

For example, Oldham College was praised for designing a summer school for students who did not attend school or experienced school exclusion. This improved their attendance “considerably”. Management also recruited additional staff such as youth workers whocarry out home visits and provide individual support”.

Inspectors noted that Moulton College in Northampton arranges transport for persistently absent learners “rather than withdraw them and risk them not being in education, training or employment”.

At Cambridge Regional College, staff “understand the safeguarding risks in the local area” so leaders “monitor attendance of vulnerable groups robustly to ensure students and apprentices are safe if they are absent”.

Leeds College of Building

Tackling mental health first

Many college attendance strategies have focused on helping learners feel less anxious.

When learners returned to Trafford and Stockport College Group after the pandemic, strategies included “time-out cards and the use of breathing techniques to reduce their anxiety”, Ofsted inspectors found, which helped learners “improve attendance and achieve well”.

Harlow College, recognising a “stigma with male mental health particularly in the construction trade”, embedded a level 1 mental health course into its construction course. The college also signposts learners to e-learning modules in mental health first aid and advocacy in the workplace.

At City of Sunderland College,students who struggle to attend due to physical mobility or mental health issues were receiving “high-quality resources to use remotely”.

And at Wigan & Leigh College, principal Anna Dawe says her pastoral specialists are “on the doors in the morning, on the corridors at lunch time and as lessons change over” to tackle attendance, and also liaise with parents.

Parental engagement has stepped up considerably since Covid.

At Sandwell College in West Bromwich,staff make announced and unannounced home visits to discuss attendance with learners and their parents.

At Leeds College of Building, Holmes says a “key part” of their strategy was creating a “shared responsibility for student success” with parents.

And at Macclesfield College, parents receive absence alerts by text, and 80 per cent engage with an online portal to review attendance.

Enrichment solutions

In recent years, budget cuts and staffing constraints have squeezed enrichment activities at many colleges. But some are bringing them back to boost attendance.

Harlow College went from having no enrichment programme to 40 per cent of its first-year students engaging in such activities last year.

Chichester College Group bolstered its enrichment offer to “foster a sense of belonging” and “motivate young people to spend more time on campus,” says its director of student experience Nick Mercado.

When a group came back from Wales they loved each other

The group’s director of pastoral support, Matt Wright, takes groups with low attendance on excursions such as “a day at the watersports centre as a minimum” or “a week in Wales as a maximum”.

“What you would find, without question, is that when a group came back from Wales they loved each other, and the teachers that went with them,” he says. “They wanted to come back to college and be in lessons.”

But some popular enrichment activities, such as gaming, can also cause barriers to attendance.

Steve Harrison, local college director for Castleford, part of the Heart of Yorkshire group, says his college experienced challenges with students gaming during class time.

“We had to keep constantly checking the timetable to see if they were meant to be in their lessons. We now have more control over that.”

Engagement specialist Kheron Gilpin

Carrots, not sticks

NAMSS chair Humphries says colleges try to treat learners “as adults”, and “differently” to how they may have been treated in school through “positive behaviour management” rather than punishment.

Engagement specialist Kheron Gilpin believes that today’s technological and social context means capturing young people’s attention is “becoming more and more challenging”.

He recommends colleges “celebrate people for being present” and added: “Letting them feel a sense of achievement just by showing up proves quite effective.”

Some colleges are providing extra incentives as carrots, which are praised in Ofsted inspection reports.

At Bolton College, students with high and improving attendance are entered into a draw for vouchers. Its strategies have resulted in increased attendance for 16 to 18 vocational courses and GCSE English and maths.

On USP College’s level 3 engineering course, in Benfleet, Essex, teachers run a competition for the best attendance record.

Gold stars

Capel Manor Collegestaff in North London “promote good attendance” through trips, certificates of achievement and celebration parties.

East Surrey College’s positive incentives include bursary schemes, gold stars and sports club memberships.

And after RNN Group identified that students’ reasons for poor attendance included bus cancellations, financial struggles and anxiety, its managers liaised with bus companies, provided bursaries and assigned anxious learners with buddies to accompany them at college

It says the strategies are “beginning to have a positive impact”.

St Helens College’s attendance incentive strategies include not only a free breakfast but “monetary vouchers”. An attendance league table pitting courses in the construction department against each other created an “atmosphere of friendly competition,” Ofsted inspectors said.

“The quality team has now identified this as good practice, and there are imminent plans in place to implement this initiative across the college.”

NAO reveals enormity of T Level take-up failure

The UK’s spending watchdog has cast doubt on the scalability of T Levels after finding student number forecasts were missed by three quarters – resulting in a near-£700 million spending shortfall.

MPs today warned the Department for Education it had “much to do” to convince people of T Levels’ “worth as a desirable and valuable” qualification after a National Audit Office (NAO) report revealed starts this year were 75 per cent below an initial target of 102,500.

The independent body highlighted “significant risks” to expanding T Levels after revealing secret DfE estimates that show places could be limited to just 48,000 due to teacher and employer “capacity constraints”, and that there may be 6,500 learners unable to find industry placements in 2027-28.

It is the first time any DfE modelling and projections on T Levels have been put into the public domain.

The NAO told the DfE to develop “ways to understand the potential impacts on the demand, benefits and cost of T Levels” before it makes “wider strategic decisions” around the development of the technical qualifications landscape, amid plans to defund competing courses like BTECs.

The DfE’s calculations on assumed student numbers have been “inaccurate” and “lacked transparency”, the NAO said, causing financial losses to awarding organisations delivering the so-called “gold standard” qualification.

Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, said a lack of widespread awareness, declining pass rates and challenges securing industry placements show a risk to the DfE’s “ability” to scale up T Levels.

“For T Levels to be a success, the department has much to do to convince students and providers of their worth as a desirable and valuable qualification,” he added.

Bill Watkin, chief executive of the Sixth Form Colleges Association, said: “Today’s report is clear that the Department for Education cannot yet measure whether T Levels are achieving their aims. Until it can, we believe the department should change its current policy to allow medium and large applied general qualifications to co-exist with T Levels.”

The DfE doubled down on its “clear commitment” to T Levels, designed to be the technical equivalent to A-levels.

A spokesperson said: “T Levels continue to grow, with nearly 60 per cent more young people taking them last year than in the previous year. Based on employer-designed standards and with a substantial industry placement on every course, T Levels will be important contributors to our mission to grow the economy.”

Targets missed to the tune of £688m

The DfE has always claimed it never set student number targets for T Levels. However, the department told the NAO it does hold forecasts. 

In June 2021, the DfE set a figure of 100,000 enrolments by September 2025 but has now revised this down to 49,700 by September 2027.

In 2020, the first year of delivery, the number of starts almost met the 1,300 prediction, missing by 10 per cent, but the gap has since widened every year.

In 2023-24, 16,081 starts were recorded, 78 per cent lower than an original forecast of 72,200. 

Student starts in 2024-25 rose to 25,508, but based on original 2021 estimates given to the NAO, the DfE believed 102,500 students would start a T Level this year. 

The DfE had an original budget of £1.94 billion to spend on T Levels up to the end of 2024-25, but it has only spent £1.25 billion, as revealed by FE Week earlier this week.

It means the DfE underspent £688 million due to low student take-up.

Underspends are usually returned to the Treasury but can sometimes be reallocated to wider education priorities, the DfE said.

The NAO said the department has “not yet estimated how much T Levels will cost beyond March 2025” given the upcoming spending review.

Of the 16 T Levels that launched by September 2022, the NAO found actual student starts were lower than the DfE’s assumed numbers in all but one subject.

DfE estimates were used by awarding organisations to inform their pricing.

For T Levels such as digital business services, numbers were 98 per cent lower than the 4,500 predicted. Even popular courses like the education and early years T Level missed a 6,500 forecast by 35 per cent.

Awarding organisations told the NAO that the Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (IfATE), the quango tasked with rolling out T Levels, “lacked transparency” in sharing information on student numbers.

“Two awarding organisations told us they could not challenge the assumptions. Awarding organisations were locked into the prices they had set throughout the contract,” the report said.

The report found across seven contracts IfATE recently retendered, which include a new “adaptive pricing” feature, that fees payable by providers for T Level students will shoot up by between 26 per cent and 243 per cent.

And it revealed the government had struggled to convince awarding bodies to get involved in T Levels, stating that IfATE considered low student numbers, the brief announcement of the Advanced British Standard which would have replaced T Levels but has now been ditched, and “delays defunding larger overlapping qualifications” had “affected market interest in T Levels”.

Secret limit on available places

The NAO report revealed the DfE has doubts about its ability to increase student numbers and had estimated in August 2023 that the number of T Level places could be limited to around 48,000 because of “constraints imposed by shortages of teachers and industry placements”.

The department told the NAO that “any estimate of the future capacity of the system to support students was uncertain”.

“[DfE] told us that it has limited evidence regarding teachers’ availability and whether teachers would prioritise teaching T Levels over other qualifications,” the report said.

“It also estimated available industry placements based on what employers could theoretically offer, with limited data to estimate constraints across different T Levels or geographical areas.”

The DfE has not updated this estimate but has “continued to use it in its internal reporting”.

The report also revealed that the DfE estimated in 2023 there could be around 6,500 students per year without an industry placement in 2027/28.

Industry placements of at least 45 days are a mandatory component of T Levels. The sector had warned from the outset there would not be enough employers to offer placements when the qualifications were fully rolled out.

The NAO report added the DfE now expects to achieve “steady state” in September 2029, when all T Levels have been rolled out and overlapping qualifications are defunded.

“Based on its latest model, DfE’s central estimate is for 49,700 students in September 2027, and 66,100 in September 2029, with upper estimates of 60,000 and 80,000 respectively,” the report added.

Despite there not being any student earnings data yet on T Levels, the DfE told the NAO its “best judgment” is that T Levels will be “25 per cent more valuable (around £23,000 per student over their lifetime, in 2019-20 prices)” than other level 3 qualifications.

Pass rates on the qualifications are around 90 per cent but almost a third of students drop out before completing their course.

Gareth Davies, head of the NAO, said: “Although the Department for Education has made progress in delivering the wide range of courses available, efforts must be made to increase student numbers and realise all the potential benefits of T Levels.”

Joyce’s interim replacement at Ofsted revealed

Ofsted has appointed Denise Olander as temporary deputy director for FE and skills following the resignation of Paul Joyce.

Joyce’s departure was announced last month after 20 years at the watchdog. He will become deputy principal at North Warwickshire and South Leicestershire College this summer.

Olander’s appointment was announced internally on Thursday. She starts immediately and is expected to be in the role for around six months while the inspectorate advertises for a permanent replacement.

The change in FE leadership at Ofsted comes amid plans to replace current inspection reports with new-style report cards. The plan has attracted early criticism as while it removes overall judgments, the watchdog wants to introduce potentially 20 areas where colleges will be graded.

Lee Owston, Ofsted’s national director for Education, said: “I am pleased to announce that we have appointed Denise Olander HMI as our temporary deputy director, post-16 education, training and skills.

“Having worked with Denise for some time now, I know she will bring a wealth of skills, experience and knowledge to the role.”

Olander has worked as an inspector since 2014 in the FE and skills team.

Her biography on Ofsted’s website states that she is a qualified teacher with a master’s degree in leadership and management.

Prior to working for Ofsted, Olander worked at multiple large colleges with responsibilities including provision for learners aged 14 to 16, foundation learning, ESOL, looked-after children, NEET, adult community and subcontractors and college franchises.

“Denise has particular expertise in leading inspections of general further education, sixth form and independent specialist colleges and offender learning,” Ofsted’s website added.

Olander said: “I am very excited to be stepping up to the role of deputy director post-16 education, training and skills for the next six months.

“Having worked across FE colleges for over 21 years and across FES and ITE HMI roles for over 10 years, I look forward to taking on this new role. This is a very important time for the sector, and I am looking forward to working closely with you.”

MOVERS AND SHAKERS: EDITION 492


Ciara O’Donnell

Board Member Youth Employment UK

Start date: March 2025

Concurrent: Technical Author

Interesting fact: Ciara has solo travelled to Bali and swam with Manta rays


Jennifer Coupland

Board Member, Youth Employment UK

Start date: March 2025

Concurrent: Pro-Vice Chancellor (Skills Portfolio), London South Bank University

Interesting fact: As a child, Jennifer played the daughter of a bigamist in a Greek language film – suffice to say it was not a speaking role!


Shane Mann

Board Member WorldSkills UK

Start date: March 2025

Concurrent: Chief Executive, EducationScape

Interesting fact: Shane hiked the Atacama desert in 2023 – reaching an altitude of 5,600 meters on the Cerro Toco Volcano