This morning the Department for Education published the list of T-level employer panel members for the routes that will be taught from September 2022 and 2023.

Click here to view.

The panels are responsible for developing the outline content for new T-levels. They are made up of employers, professional bodies and providers and help in creating technical education programmes.

“I am thrilled these talented industry experts have come on board to help make T-levels a success,” said skills minister Anne Milton.

“They will play a key role in creating a world-class technical education system for our country.

“Introducing T-levels is a once in a generation moment. The direct experience of panel members will help to create gold-standard T-levels that give young people the skills that employers need.”

The employer led panels announced today will shape new T-level programmes in: animal care and management; agriculture, land management and production; human resources; management and administration; catering; craft and design; cultural heritage and visitor attractions; media, broadcast and production; and hair, beauty and aesthetics, and will be first taught from 2022.

The nine new panels will join the 16 existing that are already up and running, designing the outline content for the first tranche of T-levels, in routes including digital; legal, financial and accounting; education and childcare; health and science; engineering and manufacturing; and construction. 

Find out more about T-levels here, and from this presentation.

The Greater London Authority has so far drafted in 57 new bureaucrats to handle the capital’s adult education budget ahead of devolution next year.

Fifteen posts in various other teams are still to be appointed and will eventually bring the total number of administrators in the department to 72, the majority of which will eventually and controversially be paid for via a top-slice of £3 million from the adult skills budget.

An organogram of the authority’s new AEB structure was published in a briefing document ahead of a GLA meeting about the budget later this month.

The physical image (see below) lays bare the scale of the team being employed, which sector leaders have criticised as mayor Sadiq Khan plans to fund their wages by using less than one per cent of the capital’s £311 million annual AEB cash, diverting it away from frontline learning.

 

Employees in the AEB team are currently funded either by the GLA or externally.

On top of these posts, the briefing document outlines the GLA’s vast AEB governance structure (see image below), which will include a corporate investment board, AEB mayor board, skills for Londoners board, and an AEB programme board.

It comes ahead of a big month for AEB planning in London, as the inaugural meetings of the skills for Londoners and mayoral boards are set to take place, as well as appointments to the London occupational skills board.

Members of the AEB mayor board include Mr Khan, the deputy mayor for planning, regeneration and skills Jules Pipe, the mayor’s chief of staff David Bellamy, the mayoral director for policy Nick Bowes, and the GLA’s executive director of resources Martin Clarke.

Appointments to the Skills for Londoners Board are currently being finalised but are expected to be published before their first meeting on September 21.

The team of 72 AEB officials will form six units: a strategy, policy & stakeholder relationships team, a co-financing organisation to handle the European Social Fund, a funding policy and systems team, two programme delivery teams, and a management team.

Principals at a couple of the capital’s largest colleges have blasted the prospect of diverting adult education cash away from the classroom into the hands of administrators – although the GLA insists the blame lies with the government’s unwillingness to pay for what it sees as necessary oversight.

“Shocking and hugely disappointing that this has been allowed to happen and divert £3 million from this underfunded sector to pay for administrative officers @MayorofLondon #accountability #valueformoney #skillsforlife ultimately hurting learners the most,” Sam Parrett, the principal of London South East Colleges, tweeted at the time.

FE Week then revealed in June that the new AEB department will also be used to lobby for control of 16-to-18 funding, which drew further criticism.

“There are some 457,000 Londoners without qualifications and thousands more with health issues and older learners,” said Naina Kent, the equality representative for the University and Colleges Union’s London regional committee.

“That is what the budget is there for, and not on creating policy for those learners who are supported by other funding streams.”

There was cause for celebration at a university technical college this week as it was rated ‘good’, while four new apprenticeship providers were found to be making ‘reasonable progress’ in all areas.

But one specialist college didn’t fare as well after Ofsted said it ‘requires improvement’, in the only other report published in the last seven days.

West Midlands UTC, which specialises in construction and IT and teaches just over 200 students aged 14 to 19, was given grade twos across the board in its first ever inspection.

The principal, Avtar Gill, who is “ably supported by senior leaders”, was praised for overseeing “rapid improvements in behaviour, attendance, teaching and students’ progress”.

“Leaders demonstrate openness and integrity,” Ofsted found. “They have high expectations of staff and students.”

Inspectors said the school’s curriculum is “distinctive and well planned”, while employers “contribute impressively to many aspects of school life” and “the school’s specialism is evident in all that it does”.

“Most teaching is very effective,” they added. “Teachers use their strong subject knowledge to plan appropriate tasks that help students to make good progress.”

But Ofsted did note that some weaker teaching remains.

“Here, teachers’ questions do not help to deepen students’ understanding, and tasks are sometimes too easy or too hard,” inspectors said.

The report will be welcomed by UTC supporters, following a tough period at the end of the 2017/18 academic year when three separate ‘inadequate’ reports were published by Ofsted in the space of a week.

Estio Training Limited, based in Leeds, was one of the four ‘new’ apprenticeship providers to receive an early monitoring visit from Ofsted, with reports published this week which found all were making ‘reasonable progress’ in all three themes under review.

Inspectors said leaders and managers at the provider have a “strategy that is carefully devised and clear” and they “aspire to become a national market leader of IT-related apprenticeships”.

“Apprentices’ starting points are defined clearly through skills scans and base-line assessments that are detailed and relevant to the specific programme that they are starting,” they added.

The Management Academy Ltd, based in Oxfordshire, came in for similar praise.

“Leaders have a clear strategic direction to provide training for managers within the aviation industry,” Ofsted said.

“They have worked closely with a single employer to design a course that meets its business needs and the needs of apprentices.”

Meanwhile, leaders at Firebrand Training Limited, based in Bedford, “share a clear vision and determination to provide the highest quality of apprenticeship training for the digital industry.

“Since gaining a directly funded contract, senior leaders have ensured that they have a suitable management structure in place, and sufficient assessors to meet the growth in apprenticeship numbers.”

And at the University College Of Estate Management, based in Berkshire, “staff assess all new apprentices carefully to decide if the surveying technician advanced apprenticeship is appropriate for them and their employers”.

“When a potential apprentice has existing knowledge and skills which make an advanced apprenticeship insufficiently developmental, managers work with the employer to help prepare the employee for a higher-level apprenticeship,” inspectors said.

The only negative report was for Brentwood Community College, a specialist college in Greater Manchester which was established in 2014 “as a result of the local area special educational needs review for students aged over 19 who were progressing from the associated special school”.

Ofsted rated it ‘requires improvement’ in all fields apart from personal development, behaviour and welfare, which was rated ‘good’.

“The quality of teaching, learning and assessment is not yet sufficiently good so that all students make the progress of which they are capable,” Ofsted said.

“The curriculum offer requires further development so that it meets all the needs, interests and abilities of students who have high needs and ensures that they achieve their long-term goals and aspirations.”

However, the college was praised for ensuring “students make very good progress in developing strategies to manage their own behaviour”.

 

Independent Specialist College	Inspected	Published	Grade	Previous grade
Brentwood Community College	10/07/2018	06/09/2018	3	NA

 

Independent Learning Providers	Inspected	Published	Grade	Previous grade
Estio Training Limited	07/08/2018	07/09/2018	M	M
The Management Academy Ltd	18/07/2018	06/09/2018	M	M
Firebrand Training Limited	01/08/2018	06/09/2018	M	M
University College Of Estate Management	08/08/2018	05/09/2018	M	M

 

Other (including UTCs)	Inspected	Published	Grade	Previous grade
West Midlands UTC	19/06/2018	03/09/2018	2	NA

The nation’s largest college group has been praised for tackling “insecure” staff contracts, after it unveiled plans to move workers on zero-hours style contracts to permanent ones within two years.

NCG is said to have “set a benchmark” to colleges across the country by adding security to “vulnerable” staff on casual contracts.

Under the new plans, casual contracts will be restricted to eight weeks and after two years staff will be given a permanent contract. NCG has six colleges across England and will roll out the plan initially at its two Newcastle sites. 

The group has a total of 442 staff on casual contracts, out of a 2,985 workforce (15 per cent), who this move will help.

It follows a call from the University and Colleges Union in 2016 to make casual staff permanent if they’ve been working at an FE provider for at least two years.

A union spokesperson told FE Week it has had commitments in this area from other colleges since the call was made, but “we haven’t had anything on the scale of what should happen at NCG”.

UCU believes the move could “transform people’s lives”, after research from 2015 found that staff on casual contracts have struggled make ends meet. 

Over half of 540 survey respondents working in FE said that they had struggled to pay household bills. Around two-fifths had had problems keeping up with mortgage or rent commitments and three in 10 said they had had difficulties putting food on the table.

The union says staff without permanent contracts are unable to plan their lives as they don’t know how many hours they will work or what they may earn on a monthly basis.

“We are delighted with this new approach from NCG,” said UCU general secretary Sally Hunt.

“This added level of security can be life changing for staff. Some of the most vulnerable staff will go from not knowing what they might be earning each month to being able to better plan their life.”

She added: “This move from NCG sets a benchmark for good practice and it is up to other colleges and universities to follow suit.

“We are keen to work with any institution that wants to eradicate the scourge of insecurity for its staff.”

Joe Docherty, chief executive of NCG, said: “Working constructively with our trade union partners is really important to us and I’m delighted that we have worked closely with the unions to provide a framework which improves the job security of colleagues, and still allows those who wish to work flexibility to do so.

“It’s an important development which I am pleased to support.”

The Education and Skills Funding Agency is to focus on intervention and prevention in independent training providers following a number of high profile failures, as it continues to beef up its audit team.

Its latest recruitment drive for its “market oversight” unit includes six advertised roles, who will try to identify financial problems at ITPs before they occur and “respond swiftly to provider failure to ensure learner and employer interests are protected and new, high quality provision is identified”.

The new jobs include an assurance manager, senior assurance officer, assistance assurance officer, and a graduate assistance assurance officer.

“We welcome these steps as part of a two-way dialogue in terms of understanding how policy changes can possibly destabilise the ITP market

Also being recruited is a post-16 senior interventions support officer and a post-16 financial intervention support manager.

All adverts, posted on the civil service jobs website, state that they will have a specific focus on independent training providers.

The extra agency resource comes after a series of significant failures, requiring the transfer of thousands of apprentices to new employers and providers.

In March 2017, First4Skills, one of the largest apprenticeship providers in England, called in the administrators after the ESFA terminated their contract following an Ofsted grade four inspection report. As many as 6,500 apprentices were affected.

Then in August later that year the nation’s largest FE provider Learndirect was also suddenly hit with an Ofsted grade four. It had around 80,000 learners at the time of inspection and the ESFA delayed cancelling its skills contracts in an effort to avoid transferring many of the students before finishing their courses.

Mark Dawe, chief executive of the Association of Employment and Learning Providers, welcomed the new assurance and intervention teams.

“While AELP believes that the current ESFA audit process has generally worked well for a sector that has over 1,000 providers, we have been saying to the agency for some time that the intervention process should be reviewed and improved,” he told FE Week.

“We therefore welcome these steps as part of a two-way dialogue in terms of understanding how policy changes can possibly destabilise the ITP market and at the same time achieve a positive impact from any interventions that the agency feels necessary to make.”

FE Week reported in May that the rapid increase in the number of training providers has forced an expansion of the ESFA’s audit team.

All personnel in the new assurance and intervention teams will operate directly under the leadership of Matt Atkinson, the ESFA’s director of provider market oversight – a unit which now has around 120 employees.

A key responsibility of the manager who will lead the assurance team will be to “oversee, develop and manage a programme of assurance monitoring visits that targets specific risk issues and complement existing assurance activities”.

“The programme will be suitably flexible to target emerging issues and respond on a timely basis, with an emphasis on Independent Training Providers,” the job advert adds.

The successful candidate will be “responsible for ensuring appropriate quality assurance and continuous improvement procedures are in place to enable the assurance work to be delivered to the high quality standards expected”.

They must also carry out “horizon-scanning, anticipating the impact of emerging policy and sector changes, as well as technological opportunities, acting as a champion for associated business transformation”.

The post-16 financial intervention support manager must act as a “national link” between the provider market oversight unit and the ESFA intervention team “on all things relating to intervention with ITPs”.

They must “attend meetings at ITPs, providing challenge and advice on the financial position of institutions as required”.

“Endurance, fortitude and determination” are the qualities that each member of Team UK will need to beat Europe’s best, Anne Milton told competitors heading to EuroSkills Budapest at a special send-off event today.

The skills minister was full of enthusiasm when addressing the 22 gifted young tradespeople who are flying out to Hungary in less than three weeks’ time to compete in a broad spectrum of disciplines including mechanical engineering, beauty therapy, web design and cooking.

She told them that they “are the future” as life today is “no longer about what you know it is about what skills you have got as well”.

“You will be going out to Budapest representing your country and doing us proud.”

The minister said that going to the WorldSkills Abu Dhabi competition last year was “probably the most mind-blowing experience of my life” and offered this new round of competitors some advice.

“Don’t let anything get in your way,” she said.

“Never forget what you have already achieved, you are the best but you now have to compete against the rest.

“Don’t feel you are under any kind of pressure because of Brexit, don’t like thoughts like these get in your head that will stop you from doing your very best.

“If you believe you can do and believe you deserve it then you will achieve what you set out to achieve.”

Speaking to FE Week after she added: “It is going to take endurance, fortitude and determination to show the rest of Europe what they can do. Good luck to them all.”

Twenty-seven other countries will compete in EuroSkills Budapest in over 30 different disciplines. Around 80,000 spectators, including European policy-makers, educators and industry experts are expected to attend.

Ms Milton was one of a number of high-profile government officials attending today’s Team UK send-off on the Terrace Pavilion in Parliament. Sir Gerry Berragan, the boss of the Institute for Apprenticeships, was in attendance along with the ESFA’s director of apprenticeships, Keith Smith.

Shadow skills minister Gordon Marsden hosted the event.

“You just by being here today as competitors have already done a great deal and are already winners,” he told Team UK.

“Whatever happens in EuroSkills remember you are ambassadors for the UK. The stories you have and the sacrifices you’ve made to be here highlight the importance of skills and further education.”

Neil Bentley, chief executive of WorldSkills UK, which organises the country’s skills competitions, added: “In three weeks’ time we will be in Budapest competing against the best of the rest of Europe.

“Today we are here to celebrate the achievements of 22 young women and men, Team UK, who are going to be showing the best of what they can do. They’ve worked so hard to earn their seat on that plane to Hungary.

“You will be facing a new level of competition. Yes you are already the best at what you do in the UK but the challenge now is to up your game as you’ll be competing against 27 other countries.

“You might be feeling nervous but I want to reassure you that we are feeling confident in you and your ability.”

Following the speeches each competitor was issued with a special enamel pin.

Kieran Leyland, Team UK’s heavy truck maintenance competitor, told FE Week that he is “immensely proud” to get to this stage.

“It’s a great opportunity and hopefully I’ll do my best in Budapest,” said the 21-year-old.

“I’m going for gold but obviously I just want to do my best. This is everything for me.”

Holly-Mae Cotterell, Team UK’s beauty therapist competitor, said her training has been “up and down” as she’s had to learn a lot of new treatments in a short period of time but now she’s confident of success.

“Training has been intense but I’ve got my performance together now,” the 19-year-old told FE Week.

“My goals are to do the best I can and beat the previous score that I did at the nationals and if I come back with a medallion of excellence that will be amazing.”

Team UK will fly to Hungary on September 23 in preparation for competitions which will run between September 26 and 28.

FE Week is media partner and will be joining them for the whole week, producing an on location supplement following the closing ceremony.

Keep up with all the action before and during the competition on feweek.co.uk or on Twitter with the handle @FEWeek and the #TeamUK hashtag.

The government should fund the development of new higher level qualifications, paid for by a “higher technical levy” or top-slice from the apprenticeship levy, the Association of Colleges has said in a wide-ranging set of recommendations.

In a new policy paper called ‘2030 and beyond: An upgraded Post-18 education system’, the association calls for a major redesign of England’s higher technical route.

It says that by “common consent”, the country has “low numbers of students taking courses at levels four and five when compared to our OECD counterparts”.

In the first 10 years, a teaching grant should be introduced to reduce the loan required by the student

There is an “executive lift” taking 18 and 19-year-olds directly from level three courses to level six degrees and “very few taking courses at the levels in between”.

To combat this, a new suite of level four and five qualifications should be developed which include the introduction of “teaching grants” – where government would pay towards that level of education.

DfE would need to reform current “grant, fee and loan rules to incentivise and support new one and two-year courses at levels four and five”, the AoC said.

“The same fee cap and loan/maintenance arrangements should be made available for this route for students of all age – whether they are part or full time.

“In the first 10 years, a teaching grant should be introduced to reduce the loan required by the student.

“This might be in the region of, say, 25 to 50 per cent of the fee coming from teaching grant, with the loan available for the remainder. In addition, students should be able to access financial support for living costs, travel and childcare.”

Funding for both the development of the qualifications and the teaching grants “could come from charging a short-term higher technical levy (say 0.2 per cent),” the AoC proposed.

“Other options would be to top-slice the apprenticeship levy (using the funds currently spent on apprenticeships for those over the age of 25) or to redirect some of the higher education teaching funding currently spent on high costs subjects and student opportunities.”

It added: “We assume that the current accounting rules for student loans will not last and therefore that the annual costs of the new teaching grants we propose will partly be offset by lower student loan outlays.”

AoC chief executive David Hughes told FE Week that the 0.2 per cent levy “could be on the same basis as the apprenticeship levy, in which case it would raise around £1 billion”.

The association believes that some level four and five qualifications, such as Higher Nationals and Foundation Degrees, are “well developed in some sectors (e.g. engineering and construction and hospitality) but are too often seen only as a route to a degree level course in a university rather than an end point in themselves, leading into employment”.

“They are also less well known, understood and respected than degrees by parents, schools and employers in many sectors of the economy,” it said.

The AoC’s policy paper also calls on the government to scrap the 24 age limit on free first level two and three courses.

It should introduce a “statutory entitlement – with appropriate funding – to at least level three for all adults who have not previously attained that level”, which Mr Hughes estimates  “if it increases numbers by 200,000 a year (restoring them to the pre-FE loan position), this would cost £1 billion a year”.

Today’s review paper from the AoC further highlights the urgent need for post-18 reform.

“This would involve the Department for Education reversing the 17.5 per cent cut to funding at age 18 and increasing the adult education budget to replace learner loans,” the AoC said.

“As with access courses, the government could write off any level three fee on completion of a higher education course.”

There would be considerable costs to implement the report’s recommendations but Mr Hughes insisted “the aim is a long-term investment in the UK population”.

“The costs need to be set against the possibility of long-term savings if there is a shift away from full-time residential higher education,” he said, adding: “These are substantial sums but no higher than proposals to restore HE maintenance grants to their pre-2016 position.”

The government has set up a panel, led by Philip Augar, to review post-18 education.

Nick Hillman, the director of the Higher Education Policy Institute, “welcomed” today’s “imaginative” report from the AoC but predicts there is “zero chance” of all the proposals being introduced.

“Demand for level four and five qualifications has withered yet employers say they need far more people trained to these levels,” he told FE Week.

“There is zero chance that all the AoC’s proposals will be implemented but the overall approach of better level four and five provision, a more flexible apprenticeship levy and a fresh look at the old teaching grant make a lot of sense.

“I hope the Post-18 Review looks at these proposals very carefully alongside all the others it is receiving.”

Shadow skills minister Gordon Marsden added: “Today’s review paper from the AoC further highlights the urgent need for post-18 reform and contains a series of practical proposals to assist students with much-needed support including for travel and maintenance grants – issues we’ve consistently challenged Government over but they have consistently ignored.”