Skip to content
20 May 2026

Latest news from FE Week

Regulator probes collapse of engineering trainer

The Charity Commission is assessing “governance and financial concerns” at a 60-year-old engineering training charity that closed abruptly last year.

Oldham Training Centre (OTC), which has been running since 1966, dismissed staff without notice or pay in November.

Formally known as Oldham Engineering Group Training Association, the charity told employees it was about to enter creditors’ voluntary liquidation because it was “unable to make all payments”.

But five months later it is yet to formally enter liquidation, and former employees, who said they had not received wages, fear they are running out of time to claim redundancy pay within a six-month time limit.

Some staff are understood to be owed redundancy payments covering more than 15 years of employment at the charity.

Asset questions

Employees and a former trustee told FE Week they are concerned about what happened to profits from an auction of the charity’s 21,000 sq-ft training centre in Oldham, Greater Manchester.

The building was sold in July with an advertised guide price of £750,000.

Its specialist equipment, including pillar drills and lathes, were also sold online last year by a neighbour of OTC’s director of business operations Martin Peter Sherry.

Sherry, who ran the organisation, was appointed as a director of the charity’s business in July 2024. He also appears to have been a trustee for a short period.

He had previously run apprenticeship companies including Cranage Ltd, Obscurant Limited and Tatton Solutions.

OTC director Martin Peter Sherry

Ten days ago ownership of the charity’s subsidiary health and safety training business, OTC Consulting, which brought in an income of £105,000 in 2023-24, was transferred to Sherry and fellow director and current trustee James Kelly.

A Charity Commission spokesperson said: “We are assessing governance and financial concerns raised with us about Oldham Engineering Group Training Association Limited to determine any next steps.

“We can confirm that, in line with our guidance, the charity has reported this matter to us.”

The commission added that it has made no findings and drawn no conclusions at this stage.

When contacted for comment, Sherry claimed he was unavailable because he was about to start an online meeting. He now appears to have blocked our calls.

Staff ‘completely aggrieved’

Former employees told FE Week they had received limited direct contact from trustees and directors since receiving dismissal letters from Sherry on November 26. Staff were told to contact insolvency practitioner Chris Knott, of insolvency firm Leonard Curtis, with queries about redundancy payments.

However, Knott told them he could offer no help as he had not been formally appointed as liquidator.

Electrical instructor Paul Brown, who worked at OTC for 10 years and believes he is owed more than £12,000, said he felt “completely aggrieved”.

He added that staff all put “a lot of effort” into helping the centre gain a ‘good’ Ofsted grade in 2024, after a previous ‘requires improvement’ grade.

Former tutor Eric Shaw, who estimates he is owed £2,500, said he was “disgusted” staff had not been paid.

Both Brown and Shaw called for an investigation into what had happened at the charity, including the sale of its building.

OTC’s training centre was auctioned last July. (Source: https://propertyauctions.io/)

When questioned about the delay, Marie Ann Shenton, accountant for OTC, told FE Week that insolvency paperwork had now been completed, adding: “These things don’t happen overnight.”

She said assets were sold after “independent valuation” and claimed transferring the subsidiary company OTC Consulting into Kelly and Sherry’s personal ownership made the liquidation process “easier to do formally”.

She added: “It was just for ease of transaction, really. And there’s no value in the company, so it’s not as if we’ve shifted value from the holding company to shareholders.”

Falling headcount

Income and apprentice numbers at OTC appear to have declined in recent years.

It specialised in apprenticeship standards including maintenance and operations engineering technician, metal fabricator, engineering fitting and design and draughting.

Its 2021-22 accounts show a surplus of £90,000 on a turnover of £664,000, with reserves of almost £1 million.

But in 2023-24 it made a loss of about £360,000, reserves fell to £407,000, and Companies House records show it took out two loans of undisclosed amounts in late 2024, with all of its assets offered as security.

When Ofsted gave the ‘requires improvement’ grade in 2022 there were about 130 apprentices. By the time it returned to ‘good’ in 2024 there were only 75.

When contacted for comment, Kelly, also CEO of the British Metals Recycling Association, shared what he claimed was a collective statement “on behalf of the trustees”.

It said that liquidators were currently only working in an “advisory” capacity, with a formal decision on their appointment “imminent”.

It added: “The trustees have at all times sought to act in accordance with their duties and responsibilities, taking appropriate advice where required and working to ensure that decisions are made in the best interests of the organisation and its stakeholders, including learners, staff, employers and funding bodies.

“The circumstances leading to the current position are complex and have developed over time.

“As is standard in situations of this nature, several of the matters raised are now subject to formal review and will be considered through the appropriate statutory and regulatory processes.”

The statement said trustees were “fully committed” to working with bodies including the Charity Commission, and that “decisions have not been made lightly”.

However, the statement claimed it would be inappropriate to provide “detailed commentary on specific points”.

In a separate statement, trustee John Robinson, a director at Innovative Technology Ltd, distanced himself from Kelly’s statement.

He said: “Given the circumstances and my responsibilities, I’m not in a position to comment in detail at this stage.

“I have, however, taken appropriate steps through the relevant channels to ensure that matters are being addressed in line with my duties as a trustee.

“I have sought at all times to act in the best interests of the charity and its staff.”

GTA model in decline

Group training associations (GTAs) are long-running charities, often originating in the 1960s, that offer shared specialised apprenticeship training to local employers.

Employers typically access GTA training through an annual membership and sometimes oversee its management by becoming trustees.

OTC is the second GTA to close in Greater Manchester in recent years, following the liquidation of Salford and Trafford Engineering GTA (STEGTA) in 2024.

Only Stockport Engineering Training Association remains in the region. There are understood to be about 29 GTAs across England.

FE exit numbers still ‘stubbornly high’ but improving

The rate of teachers quitting the FE sector has hit its lowest level in four years, data reveals.

Analysis of the 2023-24 teaching workforce found 14.7 per cent left further education the following year.

This was 1.9 percentage points lower than the previous year and the lowest “attrition rate” since 2019-20 when 14.5 per cent quit.

Exit rates in FE had declined since a 2014-15 peak of 20.8 per cent until four years ago, when numbers began to trend upwards again.

Michael Scott, senior economist at the National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER), said the data suggests “some progress has been made in improving retention across the sector”.

However, he added exit “rates remain stubbornly high, and it is clear much more needs to be done”. He called for more funding to improve salaries and action to reduce teacher workload.

Just 8.7 per cent of those who left FE in 2024-25 were found to be working elsewhere in the education sector. This is a decrease of 2 percentage points on the previous cohort.

Younger teachers, aged 29 and under, consistently make up the majority of FE leavers. In 2023-24 they accounted for 42 per cent of teachers exiting the sector.

Pay goes up

The data, collected through the Teachers’ Pension Scheme, shows the overall FE teacher headcount rose 2 per cent in 2024-25 year on year, reaching around 57,000.

In 2024-25, the median full-time equivalent salary of a general FE college teacher was £38,813.

This represented a 3.8 per cent pay rise on the previous year and a 10 per cent rise from 2022-23, when the median pay was £35,271.

However, teachers at sixth form colleges still out-earn their FE college counterparts, reaching a median salary of £48,783 in 2024-25.

The near £10,000 pay gap is the widest since this data was first recorded in 2002.

Seven findings from DfE’s third FE workforce data release

Newbies stay put

Last year, the majority (88 per cent) of 7,500 teachers joining FE for the first time were recruited from outside the education sector.

The data also found three quarters (75.5 per cent) of new teachers who joined in 2023-24 remained in their roles one year later.

This is the highest one-year retention rate in 18 years since 2005-06 when the rate was 82.7 per cent.

Regarding pay, new teachers at general FE colleges earned a median of £33,197 in 2024-25, while sixth form college teachers earned £42,964.

This represents a 3.6 per cent increase for new general FE college teachers from the year prior, and a 14 per cent jump for sixth form teachers.

Secrecy for seven ends as devolution budgets revealed

Seven regions will take control of adult skills funding for the first time this year, as the government expands its devolution programme.

In total, £120 million in adult skills funding (ASF) and free courses for jobs (FCFJ) will be handed to the authorities in the 2026-27 academic year.

The newly devolved areas will join 13 existing authorities with full devolution of adult skills, bringing the percentage of devolved ASF and FCFJ to 77 per cent of the approximate £1.4 billion national budget.

The new adult-skills authorities are: Lancashire Combined County Authority, Greater Lincolnshire Combined Authority, Hull and East Yorkshire Combined Authority, Devon and Torbay Combined County Authority, Surrey County Council, Warwickshire County Council and Buckinghamshire Council.

While some authorities had published estimates of the funding they expected, grant determination letters released by the Department for Work and Pensions this week confirmed exact amounts for the first time.

The funding allocations were welcomed by most authorities contacted by FE Week.

A spokesperson for Devon and Torbay Combined County Authority, which will receive £13.1 million this year, said devolution of adult skills was a “positive and welcome step” that would give officials the ability to “shape provision” around local market demand and economic priorities.

They added local control would allow training to focus on “high-growth sectors”, plus local “bedrock industries” such as hospitality, tourism and care.

Infographic: table of 2026-27 adult skills funding by authority (ASF, FCFJ, totals) for seven combined authorities, source FE Week.

Strategic planning

Ahead of devolution, officials in each area prepared strategies for their first year.

Reform UK-run Greater Lincolnshire Combined Authority, receiving £19.6 million annually, has already decided to scrap eligibility for funded ESOL courses from August 2027.

Both Devon and Torbay and Lancashire aim to have a new three-year contract framework in place by “autumn 2026 onwards”, while others will not procure until the following academic year.

Plans published by Buckinghamshire Council last month revealed it would take a “light touch” approach by adopting national policies and delaying procurement until the second year of devolution to enable officials to “understand the delivery cycle” before changing providers’ allowances.

Current contracts for delivery by the council-run Bucks Adult Learning and Buckinghamshire College Group will continue.

To assure government officials that it is ready for devolution, the authority must submit an “assured” strategic skills plan that includes a skills and employment strategy that uses ASF related data, a governance framework, a procurement plan and funding rules.

However, leaders in the county have voiced concerns that Department for Education implementation funding of £150,000 over three years is “not sufficient” to cover estimated costs and is “significantly less” than other areas have been paid in the past.

They said: “We have lobbied DfE hard on this issue with no success.”

Surrey County Council will take on a £12 million ASF and FCFJ budget this year.

According to a cabinet report published in February, the council said it would finalise procurement plans once the DfE provided its final confirmation of funding levels.

It added funding would focus on “tackling the highest need”, with grant funding agreements for local providers remaining the same in the first year.

The council also plans to reduce funding for out-of-area providers and “non-contracted” spend, by assessing requests on a case-by-case basis.

At Warwickshire County Council, a spokesman said officials had found the DfE “particularly helpful” during work to demonstrate their “readiness” over the last 18 months.

They added the allocations “appear consistent” with the region’s previous funding levels for adult skills.

Strong foundations

The 2026-27 wave of adult skills devolution means there will now be four authorities with devolved skills that are not combined authorities and do not have a directly elected mayor.

Cornwall will be joined by Surrey, Warwickshire and Buckinghamshire.

These authorities, known as “foundation strategic authorities”, will be subject to tighter ringfence restrictions on what they can do with funding than “mayoral” or “established” strategic authorities.

Six more authorities are expected to gain control of their adult skills budgets in coming years, although political disputes over local government reorganisation could cause delays.

Vocational reform will only work if people trust it

Qualifications open doors for young people – but only as far as society and employers recognise their value. That is why getting them right carries such high stakes, and why changes to post-16 vocational and technical qualifications should be viewed in the context of those who take them and those who accept them. They need to be understood and they need to be trusted.

Vocational qualifications are valued by students, colleges and employers. But they have lacked the national elements – the common content and grading scales – that give GCSEs and A Levels their universal recognition. The upcoming post-16 qualification reforms are the opportunity to build that in from the ground up.

This reform programme is the most significant attempt to address this imbalance in vocational qualifications in a generation. Following the curriculum and assessment review and the skills white paper, three new types of qualification are being introduced by the Department for Education (DfE): V Levels at level 3, and foundation certificates and occupational certificates at level 2.

T Levels remain the high-quality technical route for students committed to a specific occupational direction. A Levels remain the academic route. Now in addition, V Levels (which can be taken alongside A Levels) will allow students to explore a broad vocational area without committing to it at the depth of a T Level.

V Levels are not a rebadging, or an academic qualification in disguise. They open a new vocational route, designed for students who want to develop real skills and knowledge in a sector, but with the national rigour and recognition that has historically been the preserve of academic qualifications.

Together, A Levels, V Levels and T Levels will form a family of well-recognised and valued qualifications, underpinned by nationally-set content and common grading scales – the same foundations that have made GCSEs and A Levels trusted and understood by students, teachers, universities and employers.

That degree of consistency is something we have not had before with vocational qualifications, and it matters enormously for how students’ achievements are understood and valued beyond the college gates.

However, simply understanding what a qualification means is not enough – we must trust them. This means ensuring high quality from the start. That’s why earlier this year Ofqual proposed the clear expectations and high standards that awarding organisations must meet before they can deliver the first tranche of V Levels.

Our latest consultation sets out our proposals for how awarding organisations will be regulated to deliver these level 3 and level 2 qualifications. It is open alongside DfE’s consultation on subject content, because content and the way it is assessed must be developed together to secure qualifications that are coherent and trusted.

The starting point for our regulation is clarity around the purpose of the qualifications. V Levels are intended to support progression to higher study, higher technical training or apprenticeships. To support this, our regulations must ensure V Level results provide accurate information about student attainment for recruiters and decision-makers in these areas – and that students have the knowledge, understanding and skills set out in DfE’s subject content.

Qualifications need a grading scale that is a reliable indicator of attainment, and that can be understood by students, employers and institutions. Our proposed alphabetical seven-point grading scale for V Levels is intended to differentiate a wide range of attainment of students taking the qualification, to aid progression decisions.

We propose that V Levels will be modular, with a balance of assessment methods reflecting their vocational and applied nature. This includes timetabled assessments set and marked by awarding organisations, alongside assessments set by the awarding organisation and marked by teachers and quality assured by awarding organisations. A significant proportion of timetabled assessment will take place at the end of the two-year course to ensure standards are upheld. This balance of assessment methods will be considered on a subject-by-subject basis.

For the first time, young people will have a genuine choice of high-quality, nationally standardised vocational alternatives to A Levels – qualifications whose grades are widely understood, and that universities and employers can rely on. For students, and for the colleges that support them, that is good news.

 

Benefit losses force teens to ditch apprenticeships

Disadvantaged young people are quitting apprenticeships due to welfare rules that cost poorer families hundreds of pounds in benefits, experts have warned.

The “apprenticeships penalty” has caused low-income families to lose as much as £339 per week due to 16-year-old apprentices being classed as “independent workers” within a household.

As a result, young people have turned down apprenticeships and parents are discouraging their children from taking one up.

Researchers heard of one parent who kicked their child out of the family home for not abandoning their apprenticeship.

A report by the Social Security Advisory Committee found the losses leave disabled young people, young adult carers and care leavers “much worse off”, with some choosing courses that allow them to keep benefit income.

The advisory committee urged ministers to conduct a comprehensive review of the financial “cliff edge”, particularly for families with disabled children, those with caring responsibilities and single-parent households.

They also recommended improving access to information about how household and individual benefits change when a young person pursues an apprenticeship or remains in education.

Wages cannot offset benefit cuts

The report explained that young people no longer meet the criteria for “qualifying young person” status once they leave full-time education to begin an apprenticeship, even if they still live in the family home.

However, young people in full-time education are classed as dependents, so families don’t lose out on payments.

Apprentices sign an apprenticeship agreement, a form of contract, meaning they are automatically excluded regardless of their financial circumstances.

Most families with 16 to 18-year-olds in full-time education receive child benefit of £26.05 per week for the first child and £17.25 for the second and subsequent children.

For those on universal credit, families get £78.23 per week for the child element and £52.17 per week for a work allowance before their universal credit is tapered.

In total, the government spent £2.4 billion on child benefit payments to households for 16 to 19-year-old children last year.

The report found families with young apprentices lose all three elements of benefits simultaneously, meaning they lose between £17 to £339 per week, with families with disabled members hardest hit.

Meanwhile, income for young people with part-time jobs is disregarded if they remain in full-time education.

The committee recommended ministers address the timing gap between benefit cessation, currently the August 31 after the young person’s 16th birthday, and participation commencement. Advisors said the government should extend support from the current cut-off date until young people begin their apprenticeship and have received their first wage.

Social Security Advisory Committee chair Stephen Brien said no realistic apprenticeship wage could offset the “substantial losses”.

“For too many households, choosing a vocational pathway – one that the government promotes as an equally valid route into adulthood – can trigger substantial losses in financial support,” he added.

The committee suggested a review of all benefits rules, a “joined-up approach” between the Department for Work and Pensions and HMRC, and transferring responsibility for child benefit to the DWP, from HMRC.

Adults influence decisions

The report discovered that parents, social workers and teachers were influencing young people’s choices based on their potential household income losses.

Researchers heard multiple cases of single-parent households where a child was discouraged from taking up an apprenticeship amid concerns about losing child maintenance payments.

Another family reportedly told the committee they would be £700 per month worse off if their child, who has a disability, left full-time education for an apprenticeship.

“While direct testimony from young people is limited, available evidence suggests obligation dynamics influence decisions,” the report said.

One young person agreed not to pursue an apprenticeship after learning her parents would lose income, despite feeling it was “deeply unfair”.

Another parent asked their child to quit their apprenticeship or leave the family home once they realised some of their benefits had stopped.

After being kicked out, the teenager sought a youth hub to claim universal credit to support themselves on their apprentice wage.

“Ultimately, the young person moved back into the family home, but they left their apprenticeship as a result and went back to college,” the report concluded.

Heavy burden for young carers

Young carers are ineligible for the carer’s allowance if they are in full-time education at age 16-18 or are apprentices who earn over the earnings threshold or care for fewer than 35 hours a week.

Government advisors said even with part-time courses or work, young people with caring responsibilities were becoming overwhelmed.

They also heard some young adult carers felt pushed to choose courses that were part-time, despite being unsuitable for their interests or long-term prospects.

“In these situations, we heard, young adult carers can often fail to achieve qualifications on a par with their peers,” the report found.

The committee recommended ministers remove the ineligibilities for young carers and introduce a young carer grant.

Disabled apprentices ‘much worse off’

Government advisors also warned about the impact of a 16-year-old leaving full-time education to begin an apprenticeship.

When this happens, the parents’ entitlement to child benefit and the child and disabled child elements of universal credit is stripped.

The report also found the extra time taken for a young disabled apprentice to be independently considered for disabled work benefits could leave families in “financial limbo”.

“We heard that this process could cause stress and potentially lead to dropout,” the committee warned.

It urged the Department for Work and Pensions to have “greater flexibility” on when young apprentices should claim adult benefits.

A DWP spokesperson said: “We are determined to reverse the 40% drop in young people starting apprenticeships over the last decade, and are carefully considering the report’s recommendations.

“With the apprentice minimum wage now at £8 per hour, a young person working 35 hours a week will earn around £270 a week and, as the report acknowledges, in most scenarios this offsets any reduction in household benefits.

“We’re determined to give every young person the best possible start in their career. That’s why we are investing £2.5 billion to tackle youth unemployment, creating 50,000 additional apprenticeships for young people, and introducing a new incentive of up to £2,000 for SMEs which take on a 16–24-year-old apprentice.”

From clawbacks to giving back: David Withey, SGS College

 

David Withey is a rare example of a senior government official crossing the floor to run a further education college.

He negotiated peace treaties with prime ministers, oversaw funding to local and devolved national governments for the Treasury, led a Covid taskforce in Australia and then sat atop the UK’s education system as chief executive of the Education and Skills Funding Agency (ESFA).

Then when the ESFA disbanded last year he switched direction and became CEO of South Gloucestershire and Stroud (SGS) College, because he believes FE is “the most dynamic, exciting, scalable sector”.

He greets me with a warm smile but appears, alarmingly, to have been punched in the face.

No doubt Withey made enemies due to the unpopular funding clawbacks the ESFA dished out during his three years at the helm. However, he says his black eye was not from a disgruntled accounting officer, but from dropping his mobile phone on his face while checking the time in bed.

His communications team are scrambling to find a make-up artist to conceal the bruise and make Withey look presentable when launching his college’s five-year strategy later in the day.

As a former Treasury deputy director, I expect Withey to exude the aura of a penny-pinching bureaucrat who is obsessed with data. But he is much more interested in discussing people and ideas than numbers and budgets.

“This stuff” (being interviewed) makes him “slightly uncomfortable”, but he comes across as effortlessly personable, nonetheless.

Withey grew up in a Dorset commuter village with lofty dreams of becoming a sports centre manager (his mum was a sports centre receptionist). So it seems fitting that he now leads “one of the country’s best sporting colleges”.

SGS has six campuses, and we meet at SGS Wise, which specialises in sport and arts.

When he started, Withey relinquished the office allocated to him on campus so he could spend as much time as possible “experiencing what it’s like to be here”.

David Withey in 2022 when he was CEO of the ESFA

Advice for Blair

Withey’s career trajectory started with rocket boosters attached, as his first job after studying history at the University of Nottingham saw the fresh-faced youngster “in the room, giving advice to prime ministers”.

Withey had followed a cousin into the civil service fast stream and been posted to Belfast to work on constitutional policy.

Following the 2006 St Andrews agreement (which restored power-sharing in Northern Ireland after years of political deadlock), Tony Blair wrote him a thank-you letter that Withey still cherishes.

He later became head of constitutional policy “a brilliant training ground” for communicating policy ideas, and was up until almost sunrise knocking heads during the 2010 Hillsborough Castle Agreement to get devolution back up and running in Northern Ireland.

In 2011, he had to have his “arm twisted” when he was asked to join the Treasury because of its reputation within the civil service for “very ambitious young people stabbing each other to get ahead”.

Although there was a “very strong contingent” of public school-educated Oxbridge graduates, he “never felt in any way disadvantaged” by his state school background.

A place in the sun

He led the Treasury’s local government spending team at a time when austerity loomed over budgets.

One dreary October morning at 1 Horse Guards Road, an email caught Withey’s eye asking if anyone wanted a secondment to Sydney to run the spending team for the New South Wales (NSW) government justice department.

He envisioned a relaxed life down under where civil servants clocked off at 4pm to head for the beach. But the reality was his working day was much the same as it had been in London, although he and his family appreciated the sunshine.

The plan was to stay for a year. The family ended up staying for seven more.

Withey ran NSW’s Covid economic taskforce at the start of the pandemic, which he laments as “six months of my life I’ll never get back”. He then had his first foray into education as chief operating officer for NSW’s Department for Education.

Withey appreciated being “closer to the frontline” in working for a state rather than a national government; At Whitehall, he had felt at times “a lack of proximity to the real world”.

But power was “quite centralised” at state level, making him an “even bigger fan” of more place-based devolution for England.

During the pandemic, Withey’s mum developed a brain tumour, and global travel restrictions made it hard for him to visit. So the Withey family decided to return home, with their kids (now aged 14, 11 and eight) by then “sounding like Crocodile Dundee”.

The family established themselves near the site of Glastonbury Festival, and I am aghast to hear that although he gets free tickets (for living so close), he has never been. “I’m quite happy sitting in my chair at home listening to the sound of music drifting our way”, he says.

ESFA chief executive David Withey at the AELP autumn conference

Not so wild

When Withey arrived in his next role to run the ESFA in 2022, he was “pleasantly surprised” to find that his perceptions of “appalling behaviour” during the education sector’s “Wild West” days were over.

The agency was facing upheaval as it had been stripped of its policy role and its staff count was subsequently halved. But Withey believes that during his time at the helm, the ESFA did “lots to make sure we were positioning ourselves in central government conversation in a way that enabled us to be the voice of the sector”.

Now that many of his former colleagues have been moved across to the Department for Education, Withey believes the DfE “has got better at thinking about that delivery piece”.

“There are some really good people around now who take delivery really seriously,” he says. “I’m not sure that was always the case.”

David Withey at his SGS Wise campus

Prickly clawbacks

ESFA clawbacks were the thorn in the side of many FE finance teams, but Withey is quick to defend them and is proud of having taken his responsibilities as the accounting officer for £80 billion of public money “very seriously”.

“If people were misusing money there had to be consequences… I’d have got a kick in by Parliament if that hadn’t been done.”

Where a clawback related to activity that had taken place several years earlier, Withey was “really clear” that the process and timeframes had to be managed “in a really supportive way that didn’t totally break the organisations we were talking to”.

He believes that “more often than not” the agency “got the balance right”.

The ESFA was also the funding arm for multi-academy trusts, and Withey worked closer with ministers on the school side, particularly Baroness Barran, than with then-skills minister Robert Halfon.

His biggest regret is not having done more to build “cyclical certainty” into funding allocations.

The FE sector is “still having to be too responsive to late funding allocations”, which is “unhelpful for big organisations trying to plan and manage fairly tight margins,” he says.

Withey wishes he had done more to get “the whole of the government machine” to understand this, but the DfE is “at the mercy of Treasury” which is “at the mercy of ministerial decision making”.

“Too often we’re at the back end, then having to scramble to make decisions,” he says.

David Withey watching a football match on SGS Wise campus

Enjoying life

His visits “out in the sector, looking at how the money was being spent” were the element of his job he enjoyed most, but he also “fell into the trap” of believing the FE sector was “more homogenous than it actually is”.

He tells me his “mind has been blown” since arriving at SGS by the “variety of provision and innovation happening at college level”.

Withey arrived with the notion that a fierce sense of competition between education providers could be problematic, and spent his first months in office “trying to get rid of all the sharp-elbowed nonsense” by working in partnership with local colleges and universities.

The City of Bristol College has campuses nearby, which Withey says is “fine” because “in this new world we’re all best mates”.

“The funding system drives some of the natural focus on numbers, but at least until 2030-odd there’s enough [money] to go around to mean that we don’t really need to worry too much, right?”

SGS will be riding the wave of the teenage population surge for the next four years, and after that, “massive housebuilding on our doorstep” in the form of one of the government’s biggest new-town developments of up to 30,000 homes is likely to keep demand high.

Withey suggests one solution to the capacity squeeze on colleges could be expanding timetables rather than teaching space.

He recalls how, when he worked for the education department in New South Wales, plans were put in motion to change school timetables so one pupil cohort started early, and another finished late, meaning buildings could be used for more students each day.

Although the idea ultimately proved too difficult to deliver because of “massive workforce challenges”, Withey believes colleges “need to think a bit more creatively about how we use our space” – either because of financial constraints or population demand increases.

He is in discussion with local partners in the public and third sectors, about allowing them to make use of the college’s “amazing facilities that sit unused for 18 weeks a year”.

SGS has done “lots of work around bringing learner voice into the decision-making process”, with new learner leadership team members each paid a small amount for their role.

SGS has “undoubtedly” seen a spike in young people with mental health concerns, which Withey partly blames on the “constant connectivity” of social media “rewiring people”.

Vaping is another topic of “big debate” at SGS because of the challenges involved in implementing the college’s vaping ban. Instead, Withey is considering allowing vaping in some outside areas.

“I don’t have any interest in setting all of my teachers up to fail in terms of implementing a policy that frankly is not implementable,” he says.

David Withey with some of the man on SGS’s inter sports programme that helps recovering addicts and those leaving prison to finds jobs in the fitness industry

Sporting chances

Withey takes me for a tour of his vast campus, with its two football pitches, 12 five-a-side pitches, a rugby pitch where England’s Red Roses women’s rugby union team trained during last year’s World Cup, an Olympic-size athletics track, an indoor astroturf stadium and sports hall, and the only dedicated fourth-generation American football pitch in Europe.

Withey knows SGS is fortunate to boast such impressive facilities, and acknowledges it would probably be impossible for an FE college to take on such spacious grounds today.

He is “totally committed” to the college’s academy programme, which gives those with a passion for sport the benefits of “elite coaching” without taking a course in a sport-related subject.

Its former students include Manchester City player Antoine Semenyo, but the college is “not trying to sell a false dream”. “We’re saying to our learners, ‘Come to us, do the sport you love, but you’ll also get proper pathways to future careers’,” Withey says.

Our next stop on the tour is the campus gym, to meet men who were previously in prison or receiving treatment for addiction, and are now retraining as fitness instructors and personal trainers.

By the end of this year, this programme, which launched five years ago, will have supported 55 people, including 44 directly from prison. Only one has since returned to jail. This is an impressive result, given that nationally, 29 per cent of people leaving prison are proven to have reoffended within a year.

He modestly admits to being “not the most emotional man in the world”. But the annual awards celebrating these learners’ achievements proved to be a real tearjerker moment for him.

“This is exactly what FE is about – addressing some of the barriers to learning for some of these guys who otherwise would be at risk.”

His words reflect the reasons why he made the move into the FE sector in the first place.

“I care a lot about equality of opportunity,” he says. “I went to a comprehensive school and got lucky. I want everybody to be able to access that quality of teaching and learning that we seek to deliver here.”

 

 

Sponsored academy students make ‘less ambitious’ post-16 choices

Students at sponsored academies are likely to make “less ambitious” post-16 choices, while the opposite is true for selective schools and free schools, a new report has shown.

Female students are also more likely to enrol in post-16 courses that are less challenging than their results would indicate.

The Nuffield Foundation-funded report found “clear and systemic patterns”, with school type, gender and background being major factors in whether students enrolled in post-16 destinations that ‘matched’ their ability, based on their previous performance.

It was conducted by Education Policy Institute (EPI) and the UCL Centre for Education Policy and Equalising Opportunities, using national administrative data tracking students from secondary school through to higher education.

While the report recognises that some “mismatch” between outcomes and prior attainment is normal and desirable, systemic differences in mismatch based on students’ backgrounds suggests that some groups face structural barriers.

Sam Tuckett, associate director for post-16 and skills at EPI, said the differences in outcomes “are not explained by prior attainment”, but “reflect the environments students learn in, the peers and classmates who shape their sense of what’s normal, the guidance they receive, and what they are encouraged to pursue”.

He added: “When capable students, whatever their gender, postcode, or school type, consistently end up in courses that don’t match what they’re capable of, the consequences follow them into their careers and earnings for years afterwards. Address that, and we unlock potential the system is currently failing to reach.”

Dr Emily Tanner, education programme head at the Nuffield Foundation added it was “deeply concerning that young people are still being held back by gender, ethnicity, where they live and the type of school they attend”.

Here are the key findings of the report…

1. Free schools or selective schools more likely to ‘overmatch’

Researchers created two definitions. “Overmatching” describes when a student enrols in a course “more demanding” than previous results would typically predict, while “undermatching” is when a student enrols in a course “less demanding” than previous results would indicate.

It looked at cohorts finishing 16-19 study between the 2018-19 and 2021-22 academic years.

Students from sponsored academies were found more likely to “undermatch”, regardless of what those results were.

Contrastingly, students at free schools, selective schools or UTC were more likely to “overmatch”.

But those attending converter academies and local authority-maintained schools “generally fall between these extremes”.

2. Girls less likely to make ambitious choices post-16

High-attaining male students were found to be more likely than their female counterparts to enrol on more ambitious courses than their results would indicate.

The report states several factors that could contribute to this, including that male students may be more confident in their academic ability, or that high-attaining male students are more likely to choose subjects that have higher entry requirements like maths and science subjects.

Following GCSE exam cycles in 2020 and 2021, more male students enrolled in A Levels while female students were slightly more likely to move to vocational level 3 routes.

3. Students in London more likely to ‘overmatch’

London-based students were more likely to enrol on more ambitious courses, with the city also seeing the biggest rise in students studying level 3 qualifications during the pandemic years.

Outside London, the north east saw the greatest increase in students studying level 3 qualifications compared to pre-pandemic figures.

The report found that having sufficient post-16 provision was necessary for well-matched choices, but that there was no direct evidence that having more post-16 options available led to “more stretching choices”.

4. Impact of teacher-assessed grades on outcomes

The report notes that after the 2020 and 2021 cohorts received centre and teacher assessed grades, when exams were cancelled due to the pandemic, many students received better results than expected and therefore had more options open to them post-16.

The proportion of students that went on to study level 3 post-16 qualifications increased by four percentage points in 2020, while those who did apprenticeships or studied level 2 or below qualifications fell by 1.4 and 2.5 percentage points respectively.

However, the completion rates for the year groups awarded teacher/centre assessed grades was lower.

While significant pre-pandemic inequalities in higher education remained the same, grade inflation caused by exam cancellations in 2020 and 2021 led to a widening of the gap between private and state schools, and a narrowing of the gender gap.

Gill Wyness, deputy director of the UCL Centre for Education Policy and Equalising Opportunities, said the “widening of inequalities in the university courses attended following exam cancellations reinforces the message that external exams are the fairest and most equitable way to assess students.”

5. Calls for ‘range of demanding pathways’

The report makes a number of policy recommendations for the government, including guaranteeing “a genuine range of demanding pathways within range of all students”.

It also called for them to introduce “a dedicated 16-19 student premium to fund academic, pastoral, and transition support for those most at risk of dropping out”.

Waltham Forest College names Jane Button as next principal

Waltham Forest College has appointed Jane Button as its new principal and CEO.

Button will take over this summer from Janet Gardner, who will retire in August after six years in post.

Button will depart her current role as principal of Southwark College, part of NCG, after spending around four years at the helm.

Gardner said earlier this year it was the “right time” to stand down now the college was in a healthy position.

She joined when Waltham Forest College was in early financial intervention. Under her leadership, the college was awarded an ‘outstanding’ Ofsted grade in 2024 and now has ‘strong’ financial health.

The college is expected to achieve a ‘good to outstanding’ financial health grade this academic year, according to its 2025 accounts.

Paul Butler, chair of governors, said: “This is an inspiring new chapter for the college. Building on the outstanding leadership of Janet, we are thrilled to welcome a new principal and CEO who embodies our vision and dedication to excellence.

“With the college in a position of great strength, we are confident this leadership will champion innovation, sustain our momentum, and create lasting impact for our community.”

Button began at NCG in 2020, where she joined Lewisham College as vice principal learner experience and resources.

She became principal of Southwark College in 2022 when previous principal Annette Cast left to lead Stanmore College.

Button has spent 20 years leading and managing post-16 education in several London boroughs.

She started her career as a media and English teacher at Newham Sixth Form College before moving into her first management position at BSix Brooke House Sixth Form College in Hackney.

Button said: “I am absolutely delighted to be appointed as principal and CEO of Waltham Forest College. It is a privilege to take the lead of such an important anchor institution, which has been guided with great integrity and commitment under the leadership of Janet Gardner.

“While I will be very sad to leave the college where I currently serve as principal, I am deeply honoured by the opportunity to serve the staff, students and communities of Waltham Forest College. I look forward to working together to continue to uphold the values, aspirations and future success of this inspirational college”.

Gardner added: “Waltham Forest College is a truly special place, and I am extremely proud of everything we have achieved. I am delighted on Jane’s appointment and I am confident that her leadership will not only take the college forward but also contribute to the continued success and reputation of the further education sector.”