The Department for Education has been criticised for spending tens of thousands of pounds on apprenticeship advisers, as a government-created careers guidance organisation says its own consultants are not “experts” on the subject. 

A contract worth between £60,000 and £78,000 is on offer from the DfE for a supplier who can provide apprenticeship advisers to attend higher education exhibitions run by UCAS around the country.

The advisers, who will need to “provide expert apprenticeship advice and support to potential apprentices, parents and influencers on apprenticeships and traineeships”, will have to attend a minimum of 35 events, and no more than 50. 

The higher education exhibitions currently listed online begin in Surrey on February 25, and finish almost seven months later in Edinburgh on September 17. According to the UCAS website, the events “help students explore a wide range of academic and career opportunities and discover a future that’s right for them”. 

However, concerns have been raised over why this does not fall under the remit of the Careers and Enterprise Company, which was created in 2015 to “transform the provision and advice for young people and inspire them about the opportunities offered by the world of work”.

Robert Halfon, former skills minister and chair of the Commons education select committee, said it was “not clear why more duplication and expense are necessary”. 

“This decision means that less money will be available on the front line where it is needed most,” he said. 

“The Careers and Enterprise Company already have millions of pounds of  taxpayers’ money. Why are they not using their existing coordinators to do this work?”

But a spokesperson for the Careers and Enterprise Company, which is thought to have been backed by more than £70 million of government funding, said its 125 enterprise coordinators and 2,000 enterprise advisers were not “experts” on apprenticeships. 

Geoff Barton, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said it would be “logical” for apprenticeship advice to fall under the remit of the Careers and Enterprise Company.

“It is a concern that additional money is being spent on providing this service at a time when there are such acute funding pressures in the education system,” he said.

“The provision of apprenticeship advice is important and we support any efforts to give young people information and guidance. But it is also important that this provision is delivered in the most cost-effective manner possible.”

The Careers and Enterprise Company spokesperson said enterprise coordinators “are not experts on apprenticeships as they have a wider focus on supporting clusters of 20 schools to achieve Gatsby Benchmarks” which she said leaves them “limited capacity”. 

She added that enterprise advisers are volunteers who are “already delivering a minimum of one day per month to schools”, and said they are “also not experts in apprenticeships specifically”. 

The company’s funding agreement with the DfE says its core objectives are to roll out employer engagement, support best practice and test and evaluate new approaches to careers provision, but does not specifically mention apprenticeships.

The Careers and Enterprise Company, which is led by chief executive Claudia Harris, pictured, has attracted controversy over the past year. In December, Mr Halfon accused it of believing it has a “magic money tree” and being “ludicrously wasteful” after it emerged that the company spent more than £200,000 on two conferences using public money rather than private sponsorship.

In May it was revealed that the company had spent almost £900,000 on research in the three years since it was created. 

The Department for Education was contacted for comment. 

A college in financial difficulty has ended the use of corporate cards for senior staff after its former high-profile principal claimed more than £40,000 in expenses over the last five years.

The “lavish” spending by Dame Asha Khemka at West Nottinghamshire College included numerous visits to fine-dining restaurants, five-star hotels and a private members’ club.

It has been branded as “deeply disappointing” by the University and Colleges Union, especially as this was “at a time when college finances were being squeezed”.

It is encouraging that the college has now tightened its policy on the use of expenses

The college has promised that it is clamping down on expenditure in light of the findings and its financial situation.

“The college has undergone wholesale regime-change both at governing body and senior management level in recent weeks, so this is very much a new era for West Notts,” a spokesperson said.

“In light of the financial challenges we face, the new board of governors and management team have imposed strict controls on all expenditure including expense claims. The college’s expenses policy has been reviewed and strengthened, and senior post-holders do not have use of a corporate credit card.

“We are absolutely committed to ensuring we make the best possible use of public money and to exercising the necessary rigour at all times when making spending decisions.”

Dame Asha stood down as principal of West Notts in October, shortly after FE Week revealed the college had received a £2.1 million emergency government bailout in July, just 48 hours before it would have run out of cash.

An FE Commissioner report, which had been written back in August but was published after her resignation, warned that the leader and the college’s board had “overseen a serious business failure which will impact on the whole college” and called for an “urgent review that ensures that those with ultimate responsibilities are held to account”.

According to documents obtained by FE Week, Dame Asha spent £41,666.96 between 2013/14 and 2017/18 on her corporate card, despite earning an annual pay package which reached £262,000 in 2016/17.

Among the claims was over £11,000 on food and drink, including visits to a Michelin-starred restaurant called Jamavar in Mayfair, London, and numerous sit downs at Anoki, a fine-dining restaurant.

The largest spend was on accommodation, which was largely attributed to frequent visits to India and stays at the “prestigious” Taj Hotel Chandigarh.

The college launched two ventures in the country in 2015, with one involving its subsidiary company bksb, which claims to be the UK’s “most popular eLearning solution for functional skills and GCSE”, moving its headquarters to Chandigarh.

Dame Asha didn’t visit India using her corporate card in 2016/17 or 2017/18, but did use it to stay at the five-star Beaumont Hotel in Mayfair, London.

Other spending included over £500 at a private members’ club called The Arts Club, and a one-off £340 visit to a Boots store.

On top of this, West Notts spent £15,000 on a reception at a lavish London hotel in 2014, just hours after Dame Asha (pictured) was awarded her damehood, which was reported by Chad, a local newspaper covering Mansfield and Ashfield, at the time.

We are absolutely committed to ensuring we make the best possible use of public money

The college, however, defended itself and said it was simply a stakeholder event which was already pencilled into its budget.

West Notts College told FE Week that none of the expenses in question were paid back to the college.

A spokesperson added: “The individual to whom these expenses relate to is no longer an employee of the college and, as such, it would not be appropriate to comment further on the detail.”

There is nothing to suggest Dame Asha’s expenses were not in line with the college’s policies or that they were wrongly claimed.

University and College Union regional official, Sue Davis, said: “It is deeply disappointing to see how the former principal was lavishing corporate funds at a time when college finances were being squeezed and staff pay held down.

“It is important that all senior spending is fully accountable, so it is encouraging that the college has now tightened its policy on the use of expenses.”

FE Week revealed in November that Dame Asha resigned from her post without accepting any financial payout, walking away from at least £130,000.

Dame Asha declined to comment.

Ofsted will launch its consultation on the new education inspection framework at the Sixth Form Colleges’ Association winter conference next week.

Amanda Spielman, the education watchdog’s chief inspector, will use her speech at the event in London on Wednesday to open the consultation on the new framework, which will be introduced from September.

She previously outlined the changes providers can expect to see in inspections and reports during her speech at the Association of Colleges annual conference in November.

These included scrapping outcomes as a standalone judgement, introducing a new quality of education judgement to cover curriculum alongside teaching, learning and assessment, and a reduction in the number of types of provision from six to three.

SFCA chief executive Bill Watkin said he was “delighted” that Ofsted had chosen to launch the consultation at its winter conference.

“Ofsted’s recent annual report showed that 81 per cent of sixth form colleges and over three quarters of 16-19 academies are rated by Ofsted as good or outstanding.

“There is a lot of interest in the sector about the new framework and our members are looking forward to hearing the chief inspector’s plans in more detail.” 

The skills minister Anne Milton will also address the winter conference, which is being held at Friends House in Euston, London from 9am on Wednesday, January 16.

 

The City and Guilds Group has added its voice to the growing clamour demanding more transparency from the government on apprenticeship levy spending.

The education giant called for more openness about the amount that has already been spent and how much will be taken out in April in a new report looking at the response of employers to the levy, published today.

City and Guilds’ demand for transparency follows months of wrangling with the Department for Education over how much information it is prepared to release about the levy pot.

In December, the Institute for Apprenticeships warned the apprenticeships budget was set to be overspent by £500 million this year, rising to £1.5 billion during 2021/22.

The government has strongly refuted this claim, made by the IFA’s chief operating officer Robert Nitsch during a presentation to employers at Exeter College. Skills minister Anne Milton insisted to FE Week on Wednesday the budget would be “alright” for the rest of the year.

Shadow skills minister Gordon Marsden wrote to IFA boss Sir Gerry Berragan at the end of last year asking to see Mr Nitsch’s presentation and was told the institute was “considering” releasing it. However, Mr Marsden told FE Week he is yet to receive the IFA’s final decision.

The top recommendation of the City and Guilds’ ‘Flex for success’ report is for the government to “provide more clarity about the amount of levy that has been spent and the amount that will be taken out in April 2019 so that everyone involved in delivering apprenticeships and benefiting from them is able to plan effectively”.

Kirstie Donnelly (pictured), managing director of the City and Guilds Group, said businesses need “more flexibility” in how they use the apprenticeship levy but warned “flexibility alone isn’t enough.

“The government must provide greater clarity on apprenticeship data in order to equip the industry with the holistic view it needs and enable employers to understand its wider impact.”

In the foreword to the report, Ms Donnelly warned that without “transparent reporting” of apprenticeship spend, “training providers and employers are left in the dark about the true extent to which employers have taken up apprenticeships, and where any leftover money will end up”.

Her warning follows concerns raised by the Association of Colleges at the start of last month that “we don’t know the full story about apprenticeship spending because the whole area is shrouded in secrecy”.

City and Guilds surveyed 765 businesses who pay into the apprenticeship levy to understand how it is used and what barriers they face.

The research found that 93 per cent of levy-paying firms cited some kind of block to investing in apprenticeships, including a lack of suitable apprentices in the area, not being able to find appropriate providers or concerns over 20 per cent off the job training. 

Although the government announced last year that the level of levy funds which can be transferred to other businesses in a supply chain would rise from 10 per cent to 25 per cent in April, the survey found levy-employers would be more comfortable with an average of 35 per cent.

The report makes 12 recommendations to the government in all, including calling for organisations who invest in apprenticeships to be rewarded with the option to spend levy funds on other qualifications, a commitment that a proportion of any surplus levy is invested centrally to support recruitment and promote opportunities, and for the IFA to introduce or approve end point assessments for all live apprenticeships “as a matter of urgency”.

A spokesperson for the DfE said the government was working with employers to “build awareness of how businesses can use their apprenticeship levy fund” and working with businesses to “make sure they make the best use of the levy transfer and their own levy funds.”

 

Leading universities and educational charities have joined forces to create a new commission into the adult education challenges faced by the country.

The Centenary Commission will consider what education is required in the face of longer lives, changing work needs and global challenges including the growth of technology, and address the role of adult education in globalisation, civic engagement and democracy, social mobility and communities.

The commission has been formed as part of the ‘Adult Education 100’ campaign, to mark 100 years since the Ministry of Reconstruction – created towards the end of the First World War – published its ‘Report on Adult Education’ and argued lifelong education was vital for the future of the country.

The Centenary Commission, formed by the Universities of Nottingham and Oxford as well as the Workers Educational Association, the Co-operative College and the Raymond Williams Foundation, will publish its report in November.

Dame Helen Ghosh, chair of the commission and master of Balliol College, Oxford, said: “There are eerie parallels between the problems of 1919 and those of 2019, making a powerful case for new commission to look at the challenges.”

Sir Alan Tuckett, who was honoured with a knighthood last year after leading the National Institute for Adult Continuing Education for 23 years and became known as FE’s “campaigner-in-chief” for lifelong learning, is the commission’s vice chair.

“There seems to be a complete absence of coherent thinking nationally about lifelong learning. I’m hoping the commission will find a fresh way to help decision makers see that this isn’t an extra, it isn’t an option and it can’t simply be left to the market,” Mr Tuckett, who is now a Professor of Education at the University of Wolverhampton, told FE Week.

“I hope it brings back into the public domain the kind of confidence we had as a country 100 years ago to think we could imagine a better way to do things. We can’t, as a country, only talk about Brexit forever.”

Andy Haldane, chief economist at the Bank of England and a patron of the Adult Education 100 campaign, said universities are not meeting the needs of life-long learning or doing enough to offer a “broad-based”, multi-disciplined education.

“The future university may need to be a very different creature than in the past. It may need to cater for multiple entry points along the age distribution, rather than focusing on the young.”

The commission will meet for the first time today (Thursday) at Balliol College, pictured.

Several commissions into adult education have been launched in recent years.

In March, Vince Cable announced the creation of an independent lifelong learning commission to investigate the best ways to ensure adults can access learning and retraining, as part of plans for the National Retraining Scheme.

The Labour party’s 2017 election manifesto also promised the formation of a commission for lifelong learning as part of the National Education Service, and said it would be “tasked with integrating further and higher education”.

It was announced in June that education company Pearson would launch an independent commission on sustainable learning for life, work and a changing economy, chaired by former education select committee chair Neil Carmichael.

Other members of the Centenary Commission include campaigner Melissa Benn, Lord Karan Bilimoria, chancellor of the University of Birmingham and co-founder of Cobra Beer, and Holex director Sue Pember.

As well as launching the commission, the Adult Education 100 campaign will work to bid for funding for research on the history and contribution of adult education, hold exhibitions on the story of adult education, work to protect and digitalise archives about the early days of adult education and engage with communities about the impact of lifelong learning. 

The Department for Education has published new guidance on the controversial 20 per cent off-the-job training rule for apprentices, which attempts to bust certain “myths”.

The policy, which requires apprentices to spend a fifth of their week on activities related to their course that are different to their normal working duties, has split the FE sector since its introduction in 2015.

Many have complained that the rule is the single biggest barrier to apprenticeship recruitment, but others view it as a vital part of the apprentices’ development.

A lot of opposition to the policy has come as a result of confusion about exactly what the rule entails.

One area of potential confusion is likely have come from a recent calculation change to the policy, for example.

Under original rules, the 20 per cent off-the-job was based on a 52 week year and included annual leave. But the Education and Skills Funding Agency changed this in August and stated that statutory leave should be “deducted when calculating the requirement for all apprentices who begin their programme from 1 August 2018”.

It means that the calculation to determine off-the-job hours is different for apprentices who started before August 1, 2018, compared to those who started after.

To combat confusion, the DfE has today published an off-the-job training mythbusters document. It doesn’t, however, include clarification about the calculation.

One “myth”, according to the guidance, is that off-the-job training “must be delivered by a provider in a classroom, at an external location”.

“This is not true,” the document states.

“Off-the-job training can be delivered in a flexible way. This can be at the apprentice’s usual place of work, or at an external location. It can include for example, the teaching of theory, practical training and writing assignments.”

English and maths counts towards the 20 per cent requirement for off-the-job training is another “myth”.

“Apprenticeships are about developing occupational competency and they are designed on the basis that the apprentice already has the required level (level 2) of English and maths,” the document states.

“Training for English and maths must be on top of the 20 per cent off-the-job training requirement.”

Some in the sector also believe that off-the-job training can be done in the apprentice’s own time, which again is untrue, according to the guidance.

“An apprenticeship is a work-based programme so all off-the-job training must take place within the apprentice’s paid contracted hours,” it says.

“If planned off-the-job training is unable to take place, it must be rearranged. Apprentices may choose to spend additional time training outside paid hours, but this must not be required to complete the apprenticeship.”

The government has continually reiterated that the 20 per cent off-the-job training rule is here to stay, despite protests.

But it has promised to “listen to what’s working, what the challenges are and continue to review how the reforms are working”.

You can read the full mythbuster document here.

The government has revealed plans for its first ever FE workforce survey exclusively for non-colleges to better understand the challenges they face, including new policy areas such as T-levels.

A tender was launched by the Department for Education on Monday, which seeks a contractor to design, test and deliver a “nationally representative” survey of teaching staff and leaders in independent training providers, sixth form colleges, local authorities, and adult learning providers.

It follows the department’s inaugural college staff survey that was published in November.

It may prove challenging to draw many meaningful conclusions from the data

Mark Dawe, chief executive of the Association of Employment and Learning Providers, had mixed views on the proposal.

“Anything that gives us more information about the workforce is a good thing,” he told FE Week.

“However, it is an incredibly diverse workforce, responding to multiple sectors, areas and need. It may therefore prove challenging to draw many meaningful conclusions from the data.

“Having read the tender, the DfE should also be careful to use the language of the work based FE sector, such as assessors and trainers as opposed to ‘teachers’.”

The Education and Training Foundation already conducts an annual FE workforce survey, so it appears the DfE will duplicate this work with its own research.

The ETF’s, however, does not usually attract a high number of responses – in the most recent survey, for 2016/17, just 198 providers across the whole FE sector participated, and 175 took part the year before.

The DfE’s tender document states that “all approximately 1,000 FE providers (787 ITPs, 91 SFCs and 141 LAs) are in scope” for their new non-college staff survey.

This number, however, excludes subcontractors – including those on the Register of Training Organisations without a direct Education and Skills Funding Agency contract.

Explaining why this new workforce survey is needed, the DfE’s tender document says: “More than 1,000 ITPs, SFCs and LAs receive ESFA funding, but are under-represented in the Staff Individualised Record managed by the Education and Training Foundation.

“Whilst the SIR is the best available source of workforce data available to the sector, less than 10 per cent of ITPs responded, along with 11 per cent of Sixth Form Colleges.

“Similarly, the department’s call for evidence attracted relatively few responses from these parts of the sector. As a result we know relatively little about their workforces and the challenges they face.

Anything that gives us more information about the workforce is a good thing

“Their representative bodies are important here but many do not have the resources to provide representative, robust data on their members.”

The DfE said that with the upcoming introduction of T-levels, it is “even more important to understand the composition and characteristics of the FE workforce, and the challenges staff and providers face”.

The survey will “complement” the college staff survey, and will inform areas including the “pressures and challenges that the teachers and leaders may face which affect their abilities to teach/lead”, the “background, skills and experiences of teachers and leaders”, as well as the “working patterns” of staff.

Potential contractors are asked to “consider and propose methodologies they believe would be suitable for this project that would yield high response rates and deliver robust data within the timescales and budget”.

The mainstage survey is expected to take place this year with results available by December.

Two-thirds of schools are still flouting the controversial Baker clause a year after it was introduced – leading to calls for Ofsted to police the rule.

A report published today and shared exclusively with FE Week and The Times by the Institute for Public Policy Research has warned the Baker clause has “failed to achieve its aims”.

It found that 70 per cent of the 68 FE providers approached as part of the research continue to find it difficult to access schools, while most of them who were granted access raised concerns they were only allowed to speak to less academic pupils.

Only 31 per cent of the post-16 providers believe the situation around accessing school students and promoting technical education had improved over the last year.

Meanwhile, 63 per cent of 101 secondary schools surveyed had failed to issue a policy statement, as required by the Baker clause since January last year, to show how they ensure education and training providers can access pupils to talk about technical education and apprenticeships.

Lord Baker has accused schools of “deliberately flouting and flagrantly disregarding the law of the land”, but the Association of School and College Leaders has warned the Baker clause is “only one of a large number requirements that schools have to juggle”.

The Baker clause, introduced in January 2018, stipulates schools must ensure a range of FE providers have access to pupils from year 8 to year 13 to provide information on technical education and apprenticeships. 

Skills minister Anne Milton warned in August the government would directly intervene in schools which failed to comply, but the IPPR said no intervention has taken place and providers are concerned about the “lack of any real consequences”.

The think tank randomly selected 10 schools within each region of England for its study. The other schools were from the constituencies of education secretary Damian Hinds and skills minister Anne Milton – where just three of 11 were found to be compliant.

The report said there is a focus on “pupil retention, rather than supporting students and their families to understand the options available” because schools are largely funded on a per-pupil basis.

It recommends Ofsted assesses compliance with the Baker clause as part of a wider judgement on a school’s careers guidance, including speaking to local providers to understand how effectively the school works with them.

Careers guidance would be ranked between ‘inadequate’ and ‘outstanding’, and any school which receives the lowest grade or does not comply with the Baker clause should be prevented from receiving the top grade in the ‘personal development, behaviour and welfare’ section of the Ofsted report.

But Geoff Barton, general secretary of ASCL, said another measure for Ofsted inspections is “the last thing that schools need”.

“We need to work together across the sector and with government over this issue, rather than attempting to produce results by coercion.”

A spokesperson for Ofsted said it already assessed careers guidance and the effectiveness of 16-to-19 study programmes.

But Lord Baker backed IPPR’s calls, adding: “The Baker clause was a major step to improve career guidance and by ignoring it schools are denying the right of their students to know more about technical education. This is totally unacceptable.”

Catherine Sezen, senior policy manager at the Association of Colleges, pointed out that allowing FE providers to speak to all students “doesn’t have any cost implications for schools” and will “help them to achieve the Gatsby benchmarks”.

Mark Dawe, chief executive of the Association of Employment and Learning Providers, said gender stereotyping and stopping providers talking to pupils of all abilities was a “major concern”.

Robert Halfon, chair of the education select committee said it’s time for the government and Ofsted to “get tough and penalise schools which evade their duties under the Baker clause”.

A spokesperson for the Department for Education said schools who are not supplying pupils with the necessary information will be asked for evidence of compliance with the Baker clause.

He added the DfE will “take appropriate action” against schools who do not supply this evidence.

The IPPR report also recommends the creation of a single online UCAS-inspired resource for more information on local FE pathways, as well as more responsibility on local authorities to engage parents with careers advice, help Ofsted tackle non-compliance and support partnership working across schools and education providers.