DfE launches digital service for advertising levy transfers

The Department for Education has today launched a service where apprenticeship levy payers can advertise when they have funding up for grabs by other businesses.

A help page for the Pledge and Transfer Apprenticeship Funds scheme has been created on the gov.uk website and levy payers can advertise transfers, which can be up to 25 per cent of a levy payer’s allowance, from today using their Digital Apprenticeship Service accounts.

Levy payers will be able to specify the type of apprenticeships they wish to fund, such as by location or sector. Employers can apply for funding from 27 September.

Skills minister Gillian Keegan said she is “pleased” to be making it “easier for smaller and medium-sized businesses to offer apprenticeships,” ensuring “every business can benefit from the productivity and skills of apprentices”.

A pilot to test the new system ran last month, with construction company Mace Group pledging £100,000, with promises of £350,000 to £500,000 each year for other businesses to access. Their funds will be advertised later this month.

Other businesses which took part in the pilot included Amazon pledging £50,000, Thurrock Council with £100,000 and property maintenance business HomeServe pledging £40,000.

Mace Group chief executive Mark Reynolds said the pilot had shown “the huge potential to support the recruitment of more apprentices to meet our skills shortages; and I would encourage every business that meets the criteria to take up the option”.

Drop in A-levels diversity, and 4 more EPI findings

Students who take more diverse A-levels earn more money than their peers, a new report has found mid warnings government reforms are narrowing subject choice.

Here’s what you need to know from the Education Policy Institute report, commissioned by Royal Society, into A-level subject choice. 

1.           A-level subject choices ‘narrowest since 2010’

Researchers categorised qualifications over five main subject groups: sciences, maths, languages, humanities and vocational. For each student they then counted the number of qualifications in each of these subject groups, to create a breadth score.

The proportion of students with qualifications spanning three or more of the five main subject groups halved from 38 per cent in 2010, to 17 per cent in 2019.

The fall mainly took place between 2016 and 2019 – with a 14 percentage point drop. In comparison, the proportion of students taking qualifications from only one or two subject groups increased by eight and six percentage points respectively.

Since 2017, the average student now takes A-levels in fewer than two subject groups. Only one in 100 students qualifications from four or more subject groups, compared to 1 in 10 in 2010.

Report author David Robinson said the education sixth form and college students receive is “already narrower than in most developed countries, but our research shows that over the last decade, it has continued to become even more restricted in the diversity of subjects taken.”

2.           Gove reforms and funding cuts driving change

EPI says the decline in subject diversity “very closely” follows a drop in the number of qualifications taken – the average number of qualifications fell by 43 per cent between 2016 to 2019, from five to three.

Researchers say this has been driven by Michael Gove’s reforms to decouple AS-levels in 2015 and a reduction in funding since 2010.

Entries for AS-level fell dramatically again this year to 53,300 down 33 per cent from 86,970 in 2020. Since 2017, the number of AS-level entries has fallen by 91 per cent.

EPI said the 16-19 funding formula also plays a role by providing no incentives to offer an AS level alongside their main three A-levels.

This has resulted in the total number of teaching hours decreasing by eight per cent or around 71 hours per student, the report says.

3.           More subjects could mean higher earnings

The research indicated that 26-year-olds who had studied qualifications from at least two subject groups in the 16-19 phase went on to have earnings three or four percent higher than those who studied qualifications from only one group.

After controlling for prior attainment and other characteristics, the difference had a similar impact to the university a student attended, or their socio-economic background, researchers said.

EPI said that while the effect appears small, “we must consider that we are measuring earnings early in an individual’s career”. Data is not yet available for those in their 30s, but EPI wants to measure this when it is to see if the trend continues.

Robinson said there is a “concern” that is the narrowing of provision continues “many students could miss out on the broad range of skills needed to navigate the future labour market”.

4.           Some students hit harder than others

On average, students achieving a grade 4 in GCSE English and maths take qualifications from one subject group, while students achieving grade 7 or above take qualifications from two or more areas.

Both disadvantaged students and students with special education needs are less likely to study a broad range of subjects, the report found.

Also, while students from Chinese and Indian heritage study the broadest range of subjects (2 on average), Black Caribbean and Gypsy or Roma students study the narrowest (1.5).

EPI said this is “concerning” and requires “further attention” from policymakers.

5.           ‘Wholesale review’ of 16-19 funding needed

EPI said the government must undertake a “wholesale review” of 16-19 funding to reverse the fall in provision and breadth.

They have renewed calls for greater funding for young people from low income or disadvantaged backgrounds.

Researchers added: “When the government undertook their reforms of A and AS levels they were keen to preserve the additional breadth offered by AS levels.

“This clearly has not happened. The government must act to ensure that England’s already uniquely narrow 16-19 provision is not squeezed further still.”

DfE have been approached for comment.

Asymptomatic testing of FE students to continue for the rest of term

The government has announced that it “expects” asymptomatic testing of further education students to continue for the rest of the autumn term.

In its autumn and winter Covid plan, published today, minsters confirmed the testing regime should continue beyond September, when the policy was due to be reviewed.

The plan said: “Testing in education settings has played an important role in identifying positive cases since the start of this year, helping reduce the spread by removing infected individuals from the classroom or lecture hall.

“In secondary schools, further education and higher education, the government expects that testing for students will continue for the rest of this term.

“This will be a valuable tool in minimising the overall disruption to education, and is particularly helpful for this cohort, given its current lower level of vaccine-based protection.”

Following the publication of the winer pla, the Department for Education confirmed that colleges will need to retain an asymptomatic test site on-site so they can offer testing to students who are unable to test themselves at home.

Current guidance for FE providers, last updated on August 27, told all FE providers, except independent training providers (ITPs) and adult community learning providers (ACLPs), to offer students two on-site lateral flow device tests on their return to site this academic year, three to five days apart.

It added: “Students and staff should then continue to test twice weekly at home until the end of September, when this will be reviewed. ITPs and ACLPs are not required to set up an asymptomatic test site. All tests should be completed at home by staff and students.

“FE providers, except ITPs and ACLPs, should also retain a small asymptomatic test site on-site until further notice so they can offer testing to students who are unable to test themselves at home.”

Williamson reportedly out in Boris’s ‘build back better’ reshuffle

The education secretary Gavin Williamson is widely tipped to leave his role in Boris Johnson’s reshuffle today.

HuffPost deputy political editor Sophia Sleigh reported this afternoon that Williamson had “given a leaving speech in his office”, according to a source. Williamson’s departure was also confirmed to FE Week by a second source.

Downing Street confirmed earlier today that the prime minister was conducting a reshuffle “to put in place a strong and united team to build back better from the pandemic”.

At prime minister’s questions, Williamson was reportedly one of two cabinet ministers missing from the front bench, along with Dominic Raab.

It is not yet known whether the MP for South Staffordshire will take up another cabinet role, though it is rumoured he is being lined up as a potential Northern Ireland secretary.

It is also rumoured that Oliver Dowden, currently the culture secretary, could take over from Williamson at the Department for Education.

Kemi Badenoch, currently a Treasury and equalities minister, has also previously been tipped as a potential successor.

The prime minister is expected to reshuffle cabinet ministers today, while appointments to more junior offices will be announced tomorrow.

Confirmed: Williamson sacked as education secretary in reshuffle

The education secretary Gavin Williamson has been sacked from his role in Boris Johnson’s reshuffle.

He tweeted today that it had been a “privilege to serve” as education secretary, and said he looked forward to “continuing to support the prime minster and the government”.

He added that he was “particularly proud” of the “transformational reforms I’ve led in post-16 education: in further education colleges, our skills agenda, apprenticeships and more”.

It was initially rumoured he was being lined up as a potential Northern Ireland secretary, but it has since been reported that he is likely to return to the backbenches.

A Downing Street source said Williamson had played a “key role in transforming the skills agenda”.

“The prime minister is grateful for his loyalty and service.”

The prime minister’s office is also yet to name his successor at the Department for Education. It is reported that Oliver Dowden, currently the culture secretary, could take over.

Kemi Badenoch, currently a Treasury and equalities minister, has also previously been tipped as a potential successor.

Williamson is leaving after more than two years in the job, much of which has been during the Covid-19 pandemic.

He has faced heavy criticism for his handling of the pandemic’s impact on schools, colleges, training providers and universities.

They include the way school and FE provider closures were planned, the lack of contingency planning for exam cancellations and the confusion caused over January’s BTEC and other vocational exams, and FE and skills providers originally being included, then excluded, then included again in catch-up funding.

As of last week he had a net approval rating of -53 among Conservative Party members. He has faced repeated calls to resign from Labour and education unions, and even the Institute for Government think tank called for him to go last year.

Williamson served in the role for 785 days, making him the 17th longest-serving (or the 19th shortest-serving) education secretary. He beat his predecessor Damian Hinds by 222 days, but did not make it to the average term length for education secretaries, which is 850.

A Downing Street source said today the reshuffle was being conducted “to put in place a strong and united team to build back better from the pandemic”.

Shadow education secretary Kate Green said Williamson had “failed children and young people, their parents and our hard working education staff”.

“Two years of exams chaos and staff abandoned, unsupported and demoralised. That is Gavin Williamson’s legacy.”

University and College Union general secretary Jo Grady said Williamson will be remembered by university and college staff as a “disastrous secretary of state who caused deep and lasting damage”.

“From the mutant algorithm which attempted to hardwire inequalities into the exam system, to his negligent mismanagement of the pandemic leading to schools, universities and colleges becoming Covid incubators, Williamson’s long list of failures is shocking,” she added.

‘Better late than never’: 16-18 traineeships tender to launch ‘later this month’

The Education and Skills Funding Agency has announced it will finally launch a market entry exercise to expand the number of providers offering 16 to 18 traineeships “later this month”.

It comes two days after the Treasury revealed the government had missed its target to triple the number of people taking the pre-employment by more than half.

In its weekly update, published today, the ESFA said the opportunity will be open to training organisations “not currently contracted or allocated delivery of 16 to 19 study programme activity or 16 to 18 traineeship provision”.

The agency is “particularly interested” in applications from training providers “ready to deliver traineeships and have the capacity to deliver a high-quality programme to young people”.

To be eligible, providers must be rated by Ofsted as either ‘outstanding’ or ‘good’ and hold another ESFA contract for the 2021/22 academic year.

However, the agency said it will “consider existing traineeship providers that have a 19 to 24 traineeship 2021 to 2022 contract without an Ofsted grade one or two”.

Providers must not be in formal intervention, not been issued with a notice to improve, not be subject to an investigation for breach of contract and/or failed audit in the past three years, and not have a financial health grade of ‘inadequate’.

The ESFA has been promising a 16 to 18 traineeship market entry exercise all year but has so far failed to launch one despite running a procurement to expand the 19 to 24 traineeship provider base.

A progress report for the chancellor Rishi Sunak’s Plan for Jobs, which earmarked £111 million for up to 36,700 additional traineeships in 2020/21, was published this week and revealed there were only 17,000 traineeship starts last year – 46 per cent of the target.

There were 14,900 traineeship starts in 2019/20 – so the numbers only increased by 14 per cent last year despite £1,000 incentives being offered to employers and a raft of changes to funding rules to make the programmes more flexible.

Association of Employment and Learning Providers chief executive Jane Hickie said news of the 16 to 18 exercise was “better late than never”.

“But there is one major proviso – today’s announced procurement must take place quickly and the contract awarding process has to keep to schedule,” she added.

“Otherwise the chancellor’s faith in the programme will not be repaid in the way that it should.”

Troubleshooter takes the reins at newly formed college

A newly formed college has appointed an experienced troubleshooter as its interim chief executive.

City of Portsmouth College, which launched last month following a merger between Portsmouth College and crisis-hit Highbury College, has named Graham Morley as its new leader.

He takes over from the college’s current interim chief, Penny Wycherley, who stepped in to steer Highbury College in December 2019 after its principal quit following an expenses scandal and government intervention.

Wycherley will be retiring next month.

Penny Wycherley

Morley has extensive experience in providing high-level support to boards and senior teams of colleges, particularly in times of organisational change.

He took over Hadlow and its sister provider West Kent and Ashford College in February 2019 ahead of the colleges being the first to go into education administration.

Previously, he was interim principal at Ealing, Hammersmith and West London College, and principal of Cannock Chase Technical College and South Staffordshire College.

Most recently, he worked as interim principal at Ruskin College after its long-serving principal was suspended.

Paul Quigley, chair of City of Portsmouth College, said: “On behalf of the board, college staff and wider college community, I would like to warmly welcome Graham to our amazing college. Graham’s wealth of further education experience is invaluable to our newly formed organisation, and I very much look forward to working together.”

He added that he would like to “whole heartedly thank” Wycherley for her “outstanding leadership, she has been instrumental in shaping the future of Highbury College and the City of Portsmouth”.

“Penny’s dedication and commitment to the college has been unwavering in exceptional circumstances and Penny’s impact should not be underestimated.”

 

‘I’m delighted to have been appointed’

Morley said: “I’m delighted to have been appointed as interim chief executive of the City of Portsmouth College and to continue, and build upon, the excellent work initiated by Penny over the past couple of years or so.

“I’m particularly pleased to join you following the recent merger between Portsmouth College and Highbury College. This merger clearly offers those we serve in Portsmouth, and the surrounding area, a great future as we bring together the best of what each pre-merger institution has to offer into a single, high-performing team.”

A spokesperson said that for the 2021/22 academic year, Highbury College and Portsmouth College will operate under their existing brand identities.

In September 2022, a new City of Portsmouth College brand is due to launch.

‘Excellent’ college principal retires due to ill health

A long-standing college principal has retired with immediate effect due to a terminal illness.

John Callaghan, who has led Solihull College & University Centre for the past seven years, stepped down yesterday.

He has worked in the further education and skills sector for over 33 years, holding roles at four different colleges as well as a spell at the Learning and Skills Council.

In an email to local stakeholders, seen by FE Week, Solihull College’s chair of governors Barbara Hughes said: “I am sad to inform you that John Callaghan is retiring immediately due to ill health. John has a terminal illness.

“John has been an excellent principal at Solihull over the last seven years, highly valued by students, staff, stakeholders and the local community.

“I appreciate the news of John’s retirement and illness is surprising and distressing. I’m sure you join me in wishing John every possible happiness and comfort as he spends time with his family.”

Lindsey Stewart, Solihull College’s deputy principal, has been appointed as acting principal. Recruitment for a permanent principal will take place early in the New Year, Hughes said.

According to his biography of Solihull College’s website, Callaghan started his career with Birmingham City Council in 1977 and trained as a software specialist.

He joined Tamworth & Lichfield College in 1988 and worked as vice principal while also being seconded part time to the Learning and Skill Council for a period.

Derby College was Callaghan’s next destination where he was vice principal before having a short spell in the private sector. He re-joined Derby College in 2006 as deputy principal before joining North East Worcestershire College in 2010 as principal.

He then became principal of Solihull College & University Centre in June 2014 and successfully led a challenging merger with Stratford-Upon-Avon College in 2017 following the Coventry and Warwickshire area review.

During this time, Callaghan has also been appointed as president of the Solihull Chamber of Commerce. He is also the FE principal’s representative for the Greater Birmingham and Solihull Local Enterprise Partnership.

Hughes said Callaghan leaves Solihull College, which is rated as ‘good’ by Ofsted, in an “excellent position ready for the future, with high quality teaching and learning, invaluable support to students, sound and secure finances and an extremely well-managed organisation at all levels”.

She added: “The past year of Covid has been one of the most challenging for the college and it is to John’s credit that the pandemic has been managed with compassion, clarity and safety.”

The college is producing a tribute book for Callaghan to thank him for his service and dedication.

We need to talk seriously about a 9-1 grading system for post 16

If we don’t act on grading soon, higher education providers will start to set their own entrance exams, writes Mark Dawe

With the new academic year in full swing, it’s vital the education sector looks back at all we’ve learned over summer 2021.

There’s no debate that the pandemic has created challenges for those obtaining their education, causing rifts and controversy around grades that ultimately impact their entire future.

A-levels have seen two exceptional years when it comes to results, with the latest figures showing a substantial increase in A* and A grades, building on an already significant increase in 2020.

However, we now need to think about the year ahead and the years to come. Should we keep letter grading, return to the percentage system, or come up with a future-thinking approach?

There is no perfect solution for the future, just as there wasn’t when we entered this unprecedented period.

After five years as chief executive of exam board OCR, to me one thing became clear, very quickly.

We must look for the best in what will always be an imperfect system full of compromises.

What are the purposes of A-levels?

While designed to build knowledge and skills in a particular area of interest, ultimately, A-levels rank thousands of students specialising in one area.

It was recently agreed the primary purpose of A-levels is university entry. But 45 per cent of A level students achieved an A or above in 2020 (25 per cent in 2019), with 37 per cent of students getting at least three As.

So our capacity to rank students based on their A-level results alone has diminished significantly.

Do we really want a system where each university has its own entrance exam because our national system is failing them? This is the inevitable consequence if we don’t make changes.

I would suggest we do not want this.

How do we move forward?

If the pandemic has taught us anything when it comes to grading, it’s that we need to hit the reset button.

It won’t come without upsetting either Covid or post-Covid students to some degree.

But moving to a 9-1 grading system, like the current GCSE approach, along with widening the skillset taught at A-level stage, will enable us to differentiate between our students again.

It’s designed to distinguish those working at a higher level, using harder exam questions and the need for more coursework to be delivered.

The current letter grading system, however, uses assessments at the end of modules throughout the year. It’s a system that is much more reliant on exams and results in more people achieving higher grades.

This is making it harder for universities and employers to spot those who truly excel in their areas of expertise.

Additional courses

Many have also argued that A-levels aren’t broad enough, don’t cover the “soft skills” such as communication and teamwork and don’t produce a rounded individual with an easy pathway into work.

Surely every student should have digital skills plus an understanding of the workforce and issues like sustainability and low carbon when they leave education?

So with online learning increasingly popular, it’s more possible than ever to provide a blend of core A-levels alongside a whole range of online courses to add value to a student’s development.

In fact, these additional courses are now even more essential when it comes to both university entry and employment.

At The Skills Network, we use AI to determine our students’ individual strengths and gaps to pinpoint exactly what additional programmes they should undertake to support their development.

From there, an individualised online learning plan provides the young person with access to a whole range of additional skills unique to their current skillset.

This also doesn’t add further strain on already overworked teachers.

Going forward, let’s build a better system for grading, and focus on the other skills our students need to help get them prepared for the working world.