Skip to content
18 June 2026

Latest news from FE Week

High Court overturns ban on new starts at apprenticeship provider 

An apprenticeship provider has had a government-enforced suspension on new starts lifted by the High Court while the firm battles Ofsted to overturn an ‘inadequate’ judgment.

Quest Vocational Training Ltd (QVT), which is based in Dorset, was granted the order by judge Heather Williams this month after the Department for Education imposed a ban on recruiting apprentices from June 1, 2022, following a critical report from the inspectorate.

The department, acting through the Education and Skills Funding Agency, also threatened to terminate the firm’s apprenticeship funding contract – an action that could force the company to go bust – but has agreed to hold off on this decision until QVT’s case against Ofsted has been settled.

The provider challenged the education watchdog by claiming its inspection was “procedurally flawed” after a visit in November 2021, but Ofsted rejected the complaint and published the grade four report in March. QVT alleged that the report contained factual inaccuracies along with a “disproportionate emphasis on matters which were beyond our control through the pandemic” – such as a lack of off-the-job training in the care sector.

The training firm has begun a judicial review against the report. No date has been set for the court case.

This is understood to be the first time an apprenticeship provider has successfully overturned a suspension on new starts through legal action.

Provider sues DfE

QVT was formed in 2012 to provide apprenticeships for the health and social care sector. It initially operated as a subcontractor but became a main provider in 2017 with its own direct funding contract. The provider employs more than 50 staff and was training almost 700 apprentices at the time of Ofsted’s inspection last year.

Court documents obtained by FE Week show that QVT was seeking an interim injunction against the government’s decision to suspend it from taking on new apprentices  – a sanction that has affected the provider’s “income and viability”.

QVT claimed that the Education and Skills Funding Agency’s decision to continue the suspension while it was in the process of a judicial review was unreasonable and disproportionate, claiming that the agency had also been given “sufficient evidence, independent expert evidence, and evidence from Ofsted” that demonstrated it had taken the necessary steps to address the regulator’s concerns.

The “evidence from Ofsted” referred to a follow-up monitoring visit on June 29 that found QVT to be making “reasonable progress” in all areas.

Private training providers do not typically receive follow-up visits from Ofsted after grade four reports as their funding contracts are usually swiftly terminated by the ESFA.

However, Ofsted revisited QVT after the ESFA said it would not make a decision about removing the firm from the register of apprenticeship training providers and terminating its funding until the judicial review had concluded.

On June 30, a day after Ofsted’s monitoring visit, the ESFA wrote to QVT stating it would in the meantime continue the suspension on starts.

The ESFA, in documents detailing its defence, denied that this decision was unreasonable or disproportionate and said the agency was “willing to reconsider the suspension if requested” by QVT.

The agency did not agree that the follow-up Ofsted monitoring visit showed “that the concerns had in fact been fully remedied”.

Williams signed off on a settlement agreement on September 1 which ordered QVT to withdraw its application for an interim injunction – meaning the case would not be heard in court – in exchange for the ESFA revoking the suspension on new starts.

QVT was told to provide a robust quality improvement plan that includes measurable milestones for improvement; progress reporting at monthly meetings with an ESFA team and “specific focus on the service being received by the care sector apprentice cohort that was in learning” at the time of the inspection in November 2021.

The suspension on starts and termination of contract will be subject to review after the judicial review proceedings.

QVT was attempting to argue that it could only have its funding contract terminated if it received two monitoring visit reports from Ofsted that found it to be making “insufficient progress” in at least one area.The ESFA outlined that it also has the power to remove providers from the register after an “inadequate” rating in a full inspection.

Ofsted’s allegedly ‘inaccurate and unfair’ report

Ofsted’s key complaint against QVT was that “far too many” apprentices, particularly the majority who work in adult care settings, were “not making good progress at learning enough new knowledge or participating wholeheartedly in their programmes of learning”.

Leaders were also criticised for not ensuring that all apprentices received their entitlement to off-the-job training and inspectors found that in some cases apprentices were having to complete studies in their own time, in addition to working long hours.

QVT argued that these matters were out of its control during the pandemic and it was therefore an “inaccurate and unfair reflection of the services that we provide”.

Ofsted told FE Week that it would not comment on the case but “stands by our published reports”.

QVT and the ESFA declined to comment due to the legal proceedings.

College moves to 4-day week as energy support details stall

FE leaders have demanded clarity over the government’s promised six-month energy guarantee as one college announced plans to move to a four-day week to save on rising costs.

Liz Truss, the new prime minister, last week announced a six-month scheme for businesses, charities and public sector organisations – including FE colleges – that will offer “equivalent support as is being provided for consumers” to “protect them from soaring energy costs”.

The Department for Education said providers in all DfE sectors will be eligible, but no further details have been forthcoming.

Support is set to be handed out in October alongside measures for households but the Financial Times has reported concerns that businesses may have to wait until after the support for homes is given, which could push relief back to November.

Coupled with the energy guarantee only lasting for six months, college chiefs have called on the government to offer assurances to the industry.

David Hughes, the chief executive of the Association of Colleges, said the temporary support to help with energy bills “is a sticking plaster only”.

Darren Hankey, the principal of Hartlepool College, said the intervention was welcome, but added: “Colleges have curriculum areas which are energy intensive such as engineering, construction, catering and hairdressing, and the news that this government intervention needs new legislation – and is unlikely to be clarified until November at the earliest – breeds uncertainty.”

It is understood a financial statement will be issued by the government next week, with an energy bill to follow.

Until then, Geoff Barton, the general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said sector leaders were “in limbo” without enough information to plan finances.

Jane Hickie, the chief executive of the Association of Employment and Learning Providers, said: “Many training providers are struggling with the impact of rising costs and must be allowed to operate on a level playing field.” She added that the government “won’t be able to boost economic growth without putting the skills sector on a sustainable footing”.

The government announcement came at the end of a summer of worry for many as the country waited for the leadership election to be resolved and pave the way for the new prime minister to decide what action to take on the cost-of-living crisis.

The Department for Business, Energy and Industrial strategy said the six-month guarantee will “protect [businesses] from soaring energy costs and provide them with the certainty they need to plan their business”.

It said the government will provide “ongoing, focused support for vulnerable industries,” with a review in three months to consider where that targeted support will land.

It is not yet clear whether FE is considered a vulnerable industry.

The ongoing crisis has left colleges having to adopt extreme measures to ease the cost pressures. 

Yesterday, South Essex College confirmed it would apply a four-day week across its campuses in Basildon, Southend and Thurrock to save cash. 

The college, which was one of 189 to sign a letter from the Association of Colleges to Kwasi Kwarteng, the chancellor, last week calling for more support, has a current energy bill of about £1.2 million, with a quoted price increase of 300 per cent.

It said that even with the energy guarantee its bills are likely to double, with the increase above what it forecast in its budget-setting process earlier this year.

Failure to receive adequate support could result in significant in-year cost-saving measures, the college said.

A spokesperson said the four-day week will have “multiple benefits”, which included giving teachers dedicated time for marking students’ work and the opportunity for independent study time for learners.

“It’s important to remember college differs from school in that independent study time has always been incorporated into all timetables with supervised learning scheduled for three or four days a week,” the spokesperson said.

“It is true that cost pressures on utilities and other elements of running the college have meant we have looked at ways to make savings that do not impact on students or staff.”

It said that no study time would be lost, with no sessions timetabled for Fridays.

Colchester Institute said last week that it was trying to avoid moving to a four-day week but had not ruled it out. Other colleges said they were taking measures such as installing heat pumps and reducing the number of buildings in use for evening and weekend classes to curb energy use.

Is equality and diversity still the elephant in the room?

From data policies to wellbeing, don’t let the enthusiasm for diversity die, writes Haroon Bashir

After the murder of George Floyd on 25 May 2020, many colleges made a commitment to positive changes about race.

But over two years later, does that commitment hold or has the concept of equality and diversity (E&D) become the proverbial elephant in the room?

The death of Chris Kaba at the hands of the Met police reinforces that we can’t afford the latter.

So whether you’re refining or renewing your commitment, so here are five ideas to ensure E&D is impactful in your setting.

1. Be brave

First, changing an organisation’s culture is difficult and E&D leads will face resistance from individuals who may be afraid of change, or worse, apathetic.

But if we continue doing what we have always done, then how can we hope to promote E&D?

We need to be brave, to have honest conversations, to raise awareness and challenge existing practices.

Through professional development sessions, we can effectively address this with all staff. And our aim must be to increase their confidence for discussing uncomfortable topics and seeing things through a different lens.

It may cause discomfort at times – but this is also a sign of development.

2. Invest

Promoting E&D is crucial to the success of any organisation. It should therefore have a designated person who can lead, advise, challenge and question existing practices.

For profound change to be made, the designated person will need sufficient time to undertake the role; E&D is important and should not be an ‘add-on’ to existing roles.

3. Consider wellbeing

Leading E&D can sometimes be very challenging, especially if the designated person is dealing with issues they have experienced themselves. This can be mentally taxing, so it is essential to consider what support is available to maintain the E&D lead’s wellbeing.

In this role, I have benefited a great deal from developing a network of people who I trust – people who have been there to support me during difficult times.

If we make mistakes, we must learn from them and continue to ask those questions which haven’t been asked before. It’s about making progress and addressing that elephant in the room.

4. Policies

Only seven per cent of principals in FE nationwide are from a BAME background. This is a sobering statistic.

Greater diversity and representation in governance and senior leadership is crucial to promoting E&D as this will give the organisation a variety of experiences and perspectives that will mirror their student profile.

Crucially, senior leaders and governors must make a firm commitment to E&D. One of the best ways to demonstrate this is in the college’s strategic aims. This will ensure that E&D is embedded in all policy decisions, becoming part of the new culture of the college.

Ask yourself: What does your E&D policy look like? Is it personal to your organisation or generic? What E&D data is collected to inform this policy and your decisions? Who has access to it and, more importantly, what actions result from it?

All colleges have data about students who have left, been excluded or have failed their course. But is this analysed through the lens of equality? And what action is taken to reduce those numbers? Data will help you identify a starting point and therefore allow you to measure the impact of your policy.

5. Don’t pass the buck

E&D cannot be one person’s responsibility. All too often, we waive our own responsibility by passing it onto designated people. But E&D is everyone’s responsibility and needs to be shared from the top of the organisation right through to the learner.

This means training everyone in E&D so they have the confidence to identify and challenge unfair ideas or practices. Again, CPD sessions are an excellent way to address this with all staff, and this development should filter into tutorial sessions for learners too.

We can’t change the world, and we won’t have all the answers. Equality and diversity are bigger than one college, but with these ideas in mind we can make effective change in our communities – and that’s a start worth making.

Dear Kit: Colleges are not respected enough in Whitehall

A manifestation of the lack of trust is that colleges are one of the most regulated parts of the education system, writes David Hughes

Dear education secretary,

Congratulations on your appointment to the best job in the cabinet, and welcome to the further education sector.

As a supporter of your local college, you’ll already know about the fantastic things colleges do for millions of students every year and the impact they have on local communities and businesses.

Sadly, not everyone in power knows this, so I want to invite you to work with us to champion colleges in Whitehall and more widely.

Through your visits, references to colleges in speeches and the attention you give to post-16 education and skills, you will make a big difference to how colleges are perceived and ultimately to the funding that supports their work.

Building on that, though, there is a tougher challenge I want to engage you in.

The fundamental issue for colleges is that they are not respected and trusted enough in Whitehall and among politicians. This holds back colleges from the even bigger impact they could make.

Respect and trust take time to build, so I am not expecting any overnight changes, but it would be good to hear that you want the same shift in attitudes to prevail.

It would be good to hear that you want a shift in attitudes to prevail

One manifestation of this lack of trust is that colleges are one of the most regulated parts of the education system, subject to rules and regulations designed for schools, universities and for-profit providers; and yet they are none of those.

People often tell me that colleges are too complex and do too many things and that’s why it is difficult to understand them.

An odd critique, don’t you think?

Turn that on its head and you can see colleges as truly comprehensive, community-based, charitable institutions wholly focussed on helping people to get on in life; offering everyone and anyone support, learning, training, skills, education at all levels and across most subjects.

That’s a strength, not a problem. Isn’t it?

You’ll have experience of this yourself, like all visitors to a college who hear from students about their ambitions, talents and dedication and from staff with expertise, passion and hope for their students.

Kit Malthouse, new education secretary

For me it’s as simple and compelling as that. Colleges are vital to every thriving community – for economic growth and for inclusion (whether we call it levelling up, social mobility, or social justice).

Yet a major part of your challenge will be to overcome poor understanding, low respect and low trust as well as 12 years of underfunding.

You’ll encounter this in your negotiations with the treasury and probably around the cabinet table.

We would love to work on it with you.

When it comes to the department for education, I am pleased to say there has been enormous progress in recent years.

Every week I work with officials who understand, respect and trust colleges and who, dare I say it, have become college champions.

Hundreds have seen that colleges are full of people who care about their work and about their students, and once you see that it is difficult not to love it.

Like every caring partner, the best way to show love is to celebrate, support and encourage them so that they have the confidence to use their talents to the utmost.

Wouldn’t that be a great way to work with colleges? Set them free and let them deliver.

Currently though, colleges have too many separate funding lines and programmes, all individually accounted for.

Too many instructions on what they can and cannot do, who they can and can’t help.

Too many funds they need to compete for and too many rules and regulations which get in the way.

So, as you consider where to invest your time and efforts, I hope that you will prioritise working with us to ensure colleges can deliver the economic growth that the new prime minister has promised. 

I genuinely wish you well in this new role and I look forward to working with you closely.

Further education is at the heart of the East Midlands devolution deal

The new deal means working closely with education providers to create new career pathways, writes Ben Bradley

On the 30 August, a historic devolution deal worth an initial £1.14 billion in extra investment was signed by Nottinghamshire, Nottingham, Derby, Derbyshire and the government.

This historic deal is a golden opportunity for our region.

For the first time, we’ve brought local leaders together with a shared vision and a united voice, and the work we’ve put in is being rewarded.

The initial investment figures will, in reality, multiply many times over as we seek to attract private sector cash to match our ambitions.

The deal gives us new powers over transport, skills, and the economy. This is crucial for levelling up – it’s the key to bringing in new jobs, and to giving people in our area the skills and connectivity so they can access those jobs.

It will give us the tools we need to keep pace with our neighbours in the West Midlands, which is devolved.

The devolution deal also means we’d have a fully devolved adult skills budget.

For the first time, we could tailor this to the needs of people in our communities and local businesses, helping residents achieve their ambitions and helping employers recruit people with the knowledge and abilities they are looking for.

We can steer further education in our area, to help people train or retrain, get the qualifications they need, and fill current and future skills gaps.

This means working closely with education providers to create career pathways.

West Nottinghamshire College and Nottingham Trent University are good examples of how this works in practice, with collaboration building routes into key jobs – health, in their case – and that’s a model I want to build on.

When the public and private sector work together, they can drive investment and massively impact positive change.

Both sectors need people with the right skills.

Local councils are short-staffed and under skilled in some areas. By working with local providers, we can ensure residents have the skills to access vacancies across public services.

So devolution is great news for public services and for residents in our region.

But perhaps the biggest opportunity is how we can combine private sector investment.

Our devolution deal was launched at Rolls Royce, which provides 20 per cent of our region’s exports, and employs around 9,000 people at its Derby headquarters alone.

Imagine attracting even just one more business like Roll Royce to our area.

Imagine attracting just one more business like Rolls Royce here

With improved public transport links and targeted training around a business like that, we can give our communities life-changing opportunities.

There are other promising things on the horizon. Derby is in the running to be the headquarters for Great British Rail.

We also hope to get confirmation on the STEP Fusion reactor in Nottinghamshire, a ground-breaking multi-billion investment in nuclear research to provide clean energy.

Both need the right skills and qualifications available locally.

This means that further and higher education providers will need to be agile and respond to changing local needs.

We want to ensure education providers have a big voice in shaping new devolved powers.

Skills is at the heart of our plans to improve people’s life chances in our region, from things like basic numeracy, to nuclear science and the most advanced forms of manufacturing.

For further and higher education, it means more say and more control over what courses are provided, where, and why.

It means being open with each other and working together rather than competing.

I want to personally thank the former levelling up minister Greg Clarke for his drive and commitment to getting the devolution deal signed for the East Midlands – his focus and determination were key to last week’s launch.

I now very much look forward to working with Simon Clarke, the new minister at the levelling up department, who I know is also a huge advocate for these plans.

I’ve already booked time in his diary for a chat to move things forward.

There is still a long way to go, but if we build this new structure and get it right, the rewards could be enormous.

Martin Sim, principal, City College Southampton

Martin Sim, deputy FE commissioner and now emergency principal at City College Southampton, has done some of the toughest troubleshooting gigs in the sector. He tells Jess Staufenberg why a ‘skull and crossbones’ approach keeps him buoyed up

When the FE commissioner’s team does an “intervention assessment” at a college, I can’t help imagining a lot of efficient suits frowning at the accounts.

But Martin Sim turns that image upside down. The cheerful deputy FE commissioner – currently on sabbatical from the £700-a-day role for his new post – has been parachuted in as the emergency principal for one of FE’s most concerning stories in recent years: City College Southampton. 

The college has been “three times the bridesmaid, never the bride”, as Sim puts it, in a series of failed mergers, first with Southampton Solent University, then Eastleigh College, then Itchen Sixth Form and Richard Taunton Sixth Form.

In July, former principal Sarah Stannard headed off to the Falkland Islands (having boldly criticised the ESFA’s handling of the situation) after a nine-year stint.

But more recently there has been hope. Just before Stannard’s departure, a three-way merger between City College Southampton, Eastleigh College and Fareham College in Hampshire was finally tabled. And now it’s Sim’s job to get it over the line.

As the man on the FE commissioner’s intervention team for the college, he knows (because his report in February this year shows it) that the college is surviving on £8 million of emergency ESFA money, which runs out next February.

But, despite being a former maths teacher, a hard-nosed numbers man Sim is not. Instead, he catches me off guard throughout our chat with a giant grin and penchant for a fabulous turn of phrase.

“I got Shank’s pony here and got wet,” he chuckles (leaving me like a true millennial to Google the phrase – turns out it means you’re walking). Today is his 41st enrolment day, he continues proudly – a seriously impressive stint in FE.

During that period, he has overseen the merger of Pendleton, Eccles and Salford colleges to form Salford City College, become interim principal at Gateway College in Leicester, then at Barnfield College in Bedfordshire, then Vision West Nottinghamshire College and then Nottingham College.

The FE commissioner’s office was obviously impressed, and bagged him for the deputy FEC role three years ago.

An ability to see the lighter side of life has probably helped. Phrases inspired by the Wizard of Oz, the Jolly Roger, Les Misérables and Isaac Newton roll out with a twinkle in his eye as he non-pompously explains his thinking.

Here are two sporting stories (he’s something of a fanatic) that give you a pretty good introduction to the two sides of Sim.

On the one hand, he doesn’t take himself too seriously. “Once in a pre-football match warm up, I took a chair onto the pitch, stuck it onto the penalty spot and sat on it.” When someone asked what on earth he was doing, he retorted: “‘I’ve got no intention of leaving the penalty area, and I don’t run about much these days!’” 

On the other hand, he likes serious analysis. “Cricket is fascinating. It’s the power of the team. You learn the analysis, the plan, the strategy. You learn the idea of risk.”

Alongside this positive yet analytical nature, Sim also learned resilience young. He jokes that he got it from his father, a fan of Bolton Wanderers FC (“if you can deal with watching my football team, you can deal with FE”).

A young Martin Sim

But Sim also lost his dad to a heart attack one Saturday morning when he was just nine – and was brought up an only child by his mother. 

Like the witty Lancashire man he is, he eschews any pity. “She brought me up fantastically. I don’t want to paint the picture of a poor disadvantaged person. You learn to take responsibility.”

It’s a characteristic he shares with further education. “FE should be called The Resilience Society,” he announces, with another fabulous turn of phrase. “The resilience, the creativity, the dedication that you see within all levels of FE.”

FE should be called The Resilience Society

One day, another sport-mad figure noticed Sim’s aptitudes and encouraged him into teaching. He had “drifted” into an electrical engineering degree at Bolton Institute of Technology (he quit after four weeks) and was working at a working men’s club. 

One day the cricketing chair had “a long conversation about life and ambition” with Sim and suggested teaching. “At the end of the day, you can’t drift through life, you’ve got to sort of use it,” he says. 

So, Sim trained as a maths teacher at the City of Manchester College of Higher Education, staying in Salford 33 years and rising to deputy principal at Pendleton College by 2010. This period formed his philosophy on FE, phrased in his own excellent way.

“You know in the Wizard of Oz when Dorothy enters Munchkinland and it goes from black and white into colour?” he grins again. “That’s FE. At it’s best, it colourises people’s lives!

“You still get the odd Wicked Witch of the West. But it’s about kids who experience failure, and suddenly the light shines and there’s colour because they’re successful.”

Similarly, “Pendleton [College] went in one colour and came out another” during the merger. He learned a lot about change tactics from his then-principal, Michael Sheehan.

“You have to manage with a heart. There is a mantra, which I’m now using here at Southampton: ‘Learners come first, staff a close second.’ You must create a positive culture.”

Two more thought-provoking analogies follow.

“Is it Newton’s first law which says energy cannot be created or destroyed, only converted from one form to another?” Sim muses. “The risk of any change process is to use the positive energy without changing it into negative energy.”

Then: “You do have your Susan Boyle moments [the singer famous for her rendition of Les Misérables’ I Dreamed a Dream, which includes the lyrics ‘the tigers come at night’].”

You have your Susan Boyle moments, when the tigers come at night

“The sleepless nights,” continues Sim. “The hardest job any principal can do is sit someone down and say ‘we’re having to let you go’ and see the blood drain from their face. No one does it for sport.”

After Salford City College, he moved to Ofsted grade four Gateway College in Leicester in 2017, where he spent a year demonstrating “that growth is not essential, quality is essential. You can’t just try to get bums on seats.”

Ofsted found “reasonable progress” the same year when Sim handed it over (it’s now a grade 2). After this Sim tackled grade three Barnfield College in Luton in April 2018, with inspectors finding two areas of reasonable progress and two of insufficient progress in September the same year.

In October 2018, he arrived at the crisis unfolding at West Nottinghamshire College. This, he tells me, was a very tough gig.

“One of the hardest jobs I ever had to do was at West Notts,” he says (for anyone who hasn’t read FE Week, the former principal resigned in 2018 amid significant financial troubles, and Sim faced a £22.5 million debt, and about 220 people were made redundant).

“One of the most humbling experiences is when you talk to staff and go through the evidence, and staff thank you for telling them their jobs are at risk.”

But, he adds, “the quality was excellent, and it continued to be so through that difficult period.”

He then joined the FE commissioner’s team in September 2019, before a final stint as interim principal at Nottingham College from May 2021, which had faced strikes and a £47.2 million debt. Four months later Ofsted inspectors found reasonable progress in most areas. After leaving in June this year, it was off to City College Southampton.

It seems to be Sim’s capacity to spot brilliance amid chaos that makes him an effective trouble-shooter.

“I call it the skull and crossbones approach,” he grins wickedly. “I’m flying the Jolly Roger, I’m pirating, I’m nicking someone’s great idea.”

He refuses to be drawn on exactly what has gone wrong at City College Southampton, promising me he’s “not being evasive” but that it’s complex. 

Why, for instance, did the ESFA reject three proposed mergers – even withdrawing its support for the first one with Eastleigh College?

“There are many reasons mergers fail. If we had about three hours, I could probably have a go at explaining why,” Sim says, admitting a triple failure is an “extreme situation” which has badly impacted staff.

But one thing the college must do is “mythbusting”, he says. He doesn’t want to give the rumours “lip service” but an image overhaul is clearly needed.

This includes recognising the college’s strengths: its high proportion of ESOL learners and the fact GCSE passes have increased 10 per cent since before the pandemic. “I’m looking at a lot of good things.”

This positive attitude reflects a shift in approach at the FE commissioner’s office, according to Sim (whose contract at the office continues until the end of 2023).

“The proactive approach under the current commissioner [Shelagh Legrave] of active support is going the right way,” he says, pointing out interventions now dropping.

It’s true – only four colleges entered formal intervention in 2020-21, down from 13 in the previous year. But Legrave has also warned “the challenge is going to come in 2022-23”, when lower recruitment due to the pandemic could mean “income will be down”.

But for now, Sim “remains optimistic” about the new three-way merger proposal for City College Southampton. He adds the DfE, FEC and ESFA are “onboard and working proactively with us”.

It would be good if more principals could remain in post because the margins for running a college weren’t so tight. But given the circumstances, it seems we’re lucky to have pirating, Wizard-of-Oz admiring, Newtonian enthusiasts such as Sim to step in if needed.

Do you know how to support a student with a recent autism diagnosis?

As a member of staff with Asperger’s Syndrome, I have first-hand experience of the kind of support that can really help, writes Harry Empsall

I was diagnosed with Asperger’s Syndrome in 1999 at the age of four. My journey hasn’t been an easy one because along the way I have encountered ignorance and bullying.

But I was also lucky. I had the best support behind me in the way of family, friends and staff. They encouraged me to be the best I can be even when I didn’t always find it easy. That alongside my own determination meant I achieved good GCSE and A-level grades.

I now work as a personal skills assistant at my local college for young people with a wide range of difficulties that can be both physical and cognitive.

Nothing comes without its challenges however, and the hardest thing I have had to learn is not overthink the day’s events.

What does it mean when someone gets a diagnosis?

An autism spectrum disorder diagnosis has a positive and a negative side to it. Some see it as a barrier to life which it can be because it can increase anxiety.

To others the diagnosis means that you can start asking questions and accessing support through school, college and external services.

Remember, there are no two autistic people that are the same. Even if you have a set of identical twins there is only a 76 per cent chance of the second twin being autistic, and they can still have different hobbies and interests.

What support can be accessed?

For a student with ASD a GP can recommend occupational therapy (which aims to improve your ability to do daily tasks or develop skills), speech therapy and cognitive behavioural therapy. The reason for my CBT was that I struggle with anxiety and depression.

Colleges can also provide learning support in the classroom. Having learning support really helped me during education. But it also made me feel uneasy to have support as other students began to single me out for being “special”. Remember that as a member of staff.

What can you do?

It’s important to remember that a recent diagnosis of ASD can mean the young person’s specific needs are still being assessed and identified.

This means that the student and in some cases the parents can struggle to understand the condition.

With this in mind it would be good to start researching the condition so you can provide support and answers to questions the student may have.

I would also speak to the young person which would hopefully make them more comfortable and means that they would eventually begin to trust me.

I would endeavour to learn about the young person’s likes and dislikes, their hobbies and interests.

Also read carefully through the young person’s EHCP (Education Health and Care Plan) – but you should respect how they would like to be supported because it will help them to trust you.

I would also find out what had worked for the young person and the family in the past in education. I would ask what previous schools had done, what external services had been accessed and where I could improve things.

So in my role I may give students extra time to process information and most importantly reassure them when they become anxious or stressed about any impending changes.

To avoid unnecessary stress, I always try and make myself aware of upcoming routine changes so I can warn the young person well in advance. I can tell them where they need to go, at what time, on what days.

Since I’ve been working I’ve learnt so much from my colleagues on how to deal with things and sometimes how to react to things.

A great example of this is not letting things bother me so much when it isn’t anything I have control over – sudden change for instance.

Supporting young people with difficulties in the way I was supported years before is the most rewarding feeling in the world. It’s about knowing I’ve made a difference to someone’s life no matter how big or small that is.

Government seeks views on AEB tender as funding squeeze looms

Government officials are seeking sector views as they design the next national adult education budget (AEB) tender – which one specialist is predicting will face a further funding squeeze.

Several Education and Skills Funding Agency market engagement events are scheduled for later this month, September, ahead of the launch of the invitation to tender, which is expected to get underway before the end of 2022.

It will be a rerun of the controversial 2021 AEB procurement for providers in non-devolved areas of England, which was hit with multiple delays and significantly reduced the private provider base.

But there are likely to be several differences this time around amid the government’s funding and accountability reforms, which are currently in the public domain for consultation. These include proposals for new and increased funding rates.

This, alongside increased devolution and growing investment in other provision (such as skills bootcamps and the roll-out of the new Multiply programme) could lead to a smaller funding pot.

The last AEB tender totalled £74 million, down by one-fifth on the £92 million in the previous AEB tender from 2017. FE Week analysis found the number of private providers with a direct ESFA AEB contract shrunk by almost 60 per cent, from 208 to 88.

Jim Carley, a procurement specialist in the FE sector who runs Carley Consult, said: “With the increase of alternative provision such as skills bootcamps alongside new devolution deals, such as D2N2, on the horizon, the national AEB pot may face a further squeeze.”

At the same time, he added, AEB remains “highly desirable for providers, so we can expect an increasingly high level of competition, with only those bidders achieving the highest scores winning a slice of the funding”.

A prior information notice published by the ESFA last week about the upcoming tender states that the agency will discuss how potential procurement will “interact with the proposed FE reforms and potential further devolution of skills provision”, which includes the “possible introduction of new funding rates, accountability arrangements, and the implication of further devolution deals for contracts”.

The ESFA also wants to “understand learner needs in non-devolved areas and what kind of provision needs to be prioritised” and hear “reflections on previous procurements and use this to explore potential delivery models and performance standards”.

The agency also wants to test market capacity to deliver ESFA AEB among other procurements occurring across the skills landscape, including Multiply, skills bootcamps, free courses for jobs, traineeships and the UK Shared Prosperity Fund.

It is not clear how much funding in total will be up for grabs through the procurement, or even the exact timeline, but contracts are expected to start August 2023.

Jack Flynn, assistant director of bid services at Carley Consult, said given increased devolution and greater focus on skills bootcamps, providers will have a challenging time growing their ESFA allocation, as the scope will be narrower.

The best route to doing this, he said, is by “committing to deliver more of what the ESFA needs, rather than asking for more funding for what the provider is currently doing – evolution of the offer will be crucial to maximise the funding awarded to providers”.

Online market engagement events for the upcoming tender are scheduled for September 27, 11am to 12pm, and September 29, 10am to 11am. Click here for more information.

Dates set for 26 college strikes this term

College strikes over below-inflation pay offers will take place across 10 days in four weeks this autumn, the University and College Union has confirmed.

Picketing line dates have been announced for 26 colleges, 24 of which will begin with three days of industrial action from Monday September 26.

That will then continue the following week on October 6 and 7, October 10 and 11 the week after and a further three days on October 18, 19 and 20.

Chichester College Group had been announced for the 10 days earlier this week at both its Chichester and Crawley sites, but on Thursday the UCU confirmed notifications for those had been pulled to give management more time to make an offer.

Those two colleges will strike from October 6 unless an acceptable offer is received, it said.

The UCU said that there were live mandates to strike over pay at a further nine colleges, meaning more industrial action could happen unless suitable pay offers were made for those.

Staff at Oldham, Burnley and Manchester colleges, which were balloted separately, went on strike on Tuesday and Wednesday last week.

UCU general secretary Jo Grady said staff “cannot go on being paid so little”.

“College staff deliver excellent education but over the last twelve years their pay has fallen behind inflation by 35 per cent [since 2009] and now thousands are skipping meals, restricting energy use and considering leaving the sector altogether,” Grady said.

“College leaders need to wake up to this crisis, stop dining off the goodwill of their workforce and make a serious pay offer. Failure to do so will lead to the largest strike action that English further education has ever seen.”

The full strike dates are as follows:

Monday 26 September

Tuesday 27 September

Wednesday 28 September

Thursday 6 October

Friday 7 October

Monday 10 October

Tuesday 11 October

Tuesday 18 October

Wednesday 19 October

Thursday 20 October

In June, the Association of Colleges put forward a 2.5 per cent pay offer to the UCU – up from its 2.25 per cent offer in May.

But union bosses said it was “totally unacceptable”, citing the cost of living crisis and the pay gap with teachers in schools, which is estimated to be up to £9,000.

It called for a 10 per cent rise with a minimum uplift of £2,000.

David Hughes, AoC chief executive, said college leaders want to increase staff pay, but “the money is simply not there”.

“The modest increase in funding rates last year contributed to our increased pay recommendation this year, the largest in over a decade, but this funding has largely been eaten up by soaring inflation and spiralling energy costs,” he said.

“This pay increase is both inadequate compared with inflation but also on the cusp of what is affordable for most colleges.”

The AoC wrote to then-education secretary James Cleverly over the summer outlining a series of priorities in the further education sector, which included a plea to address staff pay.

It warned that it could result in more skills gaps and could hamper the rollout of T Levels and higher technical qualifications. It called for increased funding for skilled shortage subjects.

In a further letter about the cost of energy to the new chancellor, Kwasi Kwarteng, last week, the AoC requested a new key sector workforce fund to recruit and retain teachers, a VAT exemption for colleges and a review of funding for 16-19 learners, apprenticeships and adult education.

The AoC said: “The college workforce crisis is already limiting training and education opportunities for young people and adults alike.”

UK inflation was recorded at 10.1 per cent by the Office for National Statistics in July.

In July, 89.9 per cent of voting UCU members voted for strike action, with an overall turnout of 57.9 per cent.

The 26 colleges due to strike on those dates are as follows:

  1. Abingdon & Witney College
  2. Bath College
  3. Blackburn College
  4. Bridgwater and Taunton College
  5. Chichester College Group (Crawley)
  6. Chichester College Group (Chichester)
  7. City College Plymouth
  8. City of Bristol College
  9. Croydon College
  10. Derby College
  11. Halesowen College
  12. Hereward College of FE
  13. Lambeth College
  14. New College Swindon
  15. Lewisham College
  16. Southwark College
  17. Carlisle College
  18. Newcastle College (including Newcastle Sixth Form)
  19. West Lancashire College
  20. Bournville College of FE
  21. South & City College Birmingham
  22. Strode College
  23. Truro & Penwith College
  24. Weston College
  25. Wiltshire College
  26. Yeovil College

The nine colleges where live mandates remain but dates yet to be announced are:

  1. Barnet & Southgate College
  2. Epping Forest College
  3. Hackney College
  4. Havering College
  5. Liverpool College
  6. Redbridge College
  7. Sandwell College of FHE
  8. Sparsholt College Hampshire (including Andover College)
  9. Tower Hamlets College