Ofsted faces another legal challenge over lack of Covid consideration

UKTD is the third provider recently to complain Ofsted hasn't considered the impact of Covid.

UKTD is the third provider recently to complain Ofsted hasn't considered the impact of Covid.

Exclusive

A long-running hairdressing apprenticeship provider is legally challenging a damaging Ofsted grade, saying the “shock” report fails to consider the impact of Covid-19.

UK Training & Development Limited (UKTD Ltd), based in Hemel Hampstead and set up in 1998, was dealt an inadequate rating after an inspection with the education watchdog in July. Its funding contracts are likely to be terminated by the government as a result.

In a report published last week, Ofsted claimed that leaders are “not ambitious” for most of their near-200 apprentices, adding that too many do not secure employment following their apprenticeship and fewer than half stay at their current employer.

Inspectors also said apprentices often struggle to meet the demands of work and study because they “do not regularly receive their entitlement to time away from work” and claimed that apprentices were “frustrated” with the training and assessment provided.

But the provider is furious with Ofsted’s report. Managing director Theresa Wisniewski has sought legal advice, and is now preparing to challenge the inspectorate through the courts.

Her main issue is that inspectors allegedly failed to properly consider the impact of Covid on the hairdressing and barbering industry “despite the inspection handbook requiring that inspectors do this”.

UKTD is the third provider in recent months to complain that Ofsted is handing out grade fours without considering the part the pandemic has played on apprenticeship delivery – and to follow it up with legal action.

Wisniewski said her provider’s report was “devoid of any details about Covid”.

“The practicalities of work-based learning in a sector that had restrictions imposed for months after lockdown, which ended long after other sectors had already started the recovery phase, has not been assessed in our view,” she told FE Week.

“The impact lasted for at least two years.”

This is UKTD’s third ‘inadequate’ Ofsted inspection since 2017.

The previous two were based on safeguarding failings. It is not clear why the Education and Skills Funding Agency did not terminate the provider’s contracts following the previous grade four judgements, as is usual practice for independent training providers. The agency can, however, decide not to terminate contracts in exceptional circumstances.

The ESFA declined to comment on whether it would terminate UKTD’s contracts following its latest grade four.

UKTD received an improved ‘requires improvement’ report in 2019, and Ofsted found they had made ‘reasonable progress’ in a monitoring visit in 2021.

But last week’s ‘inadequate’ report said leaders and managers “have not rectified many of the weaknesses identified at previous Ofsted inspections. “Leaders accept modest improvements too readily and have an unrealistic picture of their current position … As a result, persistent weaknesses remain.”

Although the watchdog noted that safeguarding arrangements are effective, and apprentices feel valued by staff in their learning environments.

Wisniewski said: “We are naturally very disappointed with the Ofsted inspection findings, and we have instructed solicitors to assist us challenge the findings in the report. Only a year ago we were found to be making ‘reasonable progress’ in all areas for improvement inspected by Ofsted so the current findings have come as a shock.

“It is very frustrating for any provider when outcomes lack consistency and seem to be dependent on which inspection team arrives on the day.”

Angela Sandhal of Duncan Lewis Solicitors, who will be assisting the provider with legal action, said: “My client is concerned that the current inspection findings are part of a pattern of grade four inspections at a time when providers are still in the Covid recovery phase.

“We have asked Ofsted to provide us with the raw data gathered during the inspection process but so far they have failed to do this.”

Latest education roles from

Academic Support Assistant

Academic Support Assistant

Bournemouth and Poole College

Workshop Instructor – Barnsley College

Workshop Instructor – Barnsley College

Barnsley College

Lecturer in Public Services (FTE 0.8) – Maternity Cover

Lecturer in Public Services (FTE 0.8) – Maternity Cover

Halesowen College

Skills & Development Coach

Skills & Development Coach

South Staffordshire College

Facilities Manager

Facilities Manager

Kingston College

Enhancement & Engagement Coordinator

Enhancement & Engagement Coordinator

Bradford College

Sponsored posts

Sponsored post

Active IQ: Shaping the Future of the Active Leisure Sector with 11 New Qualifications

In the ever-evolving landscape of Further Education (FE), particularly in sectors requiring highly skilled, certified professionals, certainty is crucial....

Advertorial
Sponsored post

The days of blaming funding rules for ALS claw-back are long gone

Industry experts discuss why providers must act now for the betterment of student success and stop hiding behind the...

Advertorial
Sponsored post

Are we running out of STEAM?

In the 21st century, the education landscape has been dominated by the prioritisation of STEM subjects. Science, Technology, Engineering...

Advertorial
Sponsored post

The college roadmap to AI maturity – and a reskilled workforce

AI is poised to drive economic growth, reshape jobs, and transform industries, demanding urgent upskilling. Education must swiftly adapt,...

Code Institute

More from this theme

Ofsted

Ofsted chair Dame Christine Ryan to step down

Education secretary praises Ryan for leadership during 'a period of significant challenges'

Lucas Cumiskey
Colleges, Ofsted

Cumbrian college dealt ‘inadequate’ Ofsted blow

Leaders and governors take the flak as attendance, retention and achievement declines

Billy Camden
Colleges, Ofsted

‘Relentless’ journey leads to top Ofsted result for north east college

Group lauded for student care in the aftermath of this year’s riots and inspectors 'moved to tears' after seeing...

Billy Camden
Ofsted

Q&A: One-word answers and other insights from Martyn Oliver

The government uses one-word judgments to decide when to intervene

Josh Mellor

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

3 Comments

  1. Ofsted needs a reality check. They are measuring independent training providers with the same criteria as primary schools and DfE is using them as a front to withdraw contracts. Not sure if they are short of funds or have some stealth agenda

  2. Reading through the most recent report and others beforehand, a lot of the judgements made against this provider have nothing to do with covid, including implementing no meaningful improvements and apprentices not even having consistent delivery staff. Perhaps there is adjustment needed by Ofsted on evaluating progress and achievement and this should include sectors more impacted by Covid than others, but…. Covid should not have affected the basics this provider needed to achieve to stay out of a grade 4, where they have sat pretty much consistently for 6 years. A consultant and an open mind for serious change is what is needed here i think.

  3. This training provider has a history of ‘Inadequate’ and ‘Requires Improvement’ Ofsted grades, pre and post Covid-19. Their report says that one third of learners fail their first EPA, learners feel frustrated with the training and assessment provided and they have not rectified many of the weaknesses identified at previous Ofsted inspections, etc, etc. I suspect these are the reasons behind Ofsted’s ‘Inadequate’ grading, which have nothing to do with Covid-19.

    – Ofsted ought to defend any legal action and stand by the grades they award.
    – ESFA ought to terminate contracts with providers who are Inadequate, particularly when graded Inadequate for a fourth time!

    If that does not happen, Outstanding and Good providers will feel undervalued for the efforts they made during Covid-19 to ensure they continued to support learners and provide effective and high-quality training.