The former Jewish school head aiming to set up first ever faith based T Levels centre

Former head of the Ronson Jewish Community Secondary School (JCoSS) and Anglican priest Patrick Moriarty, speaks to Jessica Hill about his vision to set up the country’s first faith based T Levels centre.

Patrick Moriarty is, he admits, “a bit messianic” in his quest to set up the first faith-based T Level centre in the country. 

The centre will cater for the Jewish community in Barnet, north London, where Moriarty has just spent 13 years, the last five as head, of England’s only cross-denominational Jewish secondary, JCoSS (Jewish Community Secondary School).  

But what makes Moriarty’s mission somewhat perplexing is that he is an ordained Anglican priest – and one who feels passionately about helping less academically minded young students he feels are being let down by the education system.  

“I’ve watched some of the most wonderful, vulnerable members of the school community, often with special educational needs, having to leave at the age of 16 – sometimes for the first time going into education outside the Jewish community, and it’s a real shock to their systems,” he says.

“I know this from some really painful cases. They feel it as a personal rejection by the school and the community. They feel that ‘just because I don’t want to be a doctor, lawyer or accountant, you’re turning your back on me’. That never felt right to me. 

“I want to make technical and vocational education sexy, and at the moment it’s not.”

“There is a sector of people for whom university is not the right thing, so let’s provide an attractive alternative…I want to make technical and vocational education sexy, and at the moment it’s not.

“Why are we now saying ‘actually, only the professional will do?’ That bothers me.” 

Patrick Moriarty at church

The government launched T Levels in 2020, with 23 courses set to be available by 2024 and a marketing course rolled out the following year.  

Moriarty’s solution, a new vocational-focused Jewish sixth-form college, will specialise in “white collar” subjects such as media, health and social care, digital and business – and the construction T Level  which he describes as “really interesting” as it focuses on the design, surveying and planning side of the industry.  

Jewish schools in London individually do not have the scale of numbers to make post-16 level three courses viable, but Moriarty believes there are enough students in the Barnet area to support the Jewish Vocational Sixth Form College – or JV6 as he calls it.  

The plan is for courses to launch in 2024 at JSoCC, with students then transferring to a new facility, most likely elsewhere in Barnet, the following year.  

He admits there is already “excellent provision” locally at Barnet and Southgate College, including six T Levels courses.  

“We don’t want to undermine them, which is why the faith bit is important to me,” he says. “We want to complement what they do, but they’re gigantic and they’ve got the capacity to run all sorts of different courses.”  

Moriarty claims to have the backing of Barnet Council as well as “huge support” from the Jewish community, including £180,000 from two big Jewish philanthropic trusts for a feasibility study. 

The only people he claims have expressed reservations about the project are headteachers of schools who “may have to adapt or lose out, or who might front T Levels of their own”.  

Philanthropic capital boost

Moriarty explains how when JCoSS opened, there was a perceived fear it would “empty” other Jewish schools or “undermine their excellence”. “But we expanded the market and brought another variety of excellence to complement their excellence. I want to try and do that again here. 

“T Levels need good philanthropic capital so that they are not as vocational education has traditionally been; an afterthought for people thought not clever enough to do A Levels.” 

He believes the Jewish community’s “cohesion, demography and employment patterns” make it “brilliantly placed to make T Levels work”. 

Moriarty is motivated not just by a “mixture of social justice and educational integrity”, but also “an eye on what the economy needs”. 

“We’ve got these catastrophic skill shortages and employers constantly saying, we get these kids out of school or even out of university and we have to start almost from scratch with them because although they may know an awful lot about the theory a subject, we have to then train them to do whatever the job is,” he says.   

The Department for Education has indicated that colleges will have to keep running T Levels for at least 20 years if they want to avoid handing back the millions they will receive in capital funding, but Moriarty dismisses concerns: “If the whole model turns out to be a catastrophic failure, the DfE is not going to be forcing colleges into financial penury and closing them down.” 

But he does admit to being concerned about the low numbers of T Level industry placements offered by companies. However, he believes a Jewish college would be “well placed” to forge partnerships with employers to facilitate their creation.  

“Within the Jewish community, there is that beautiful sense of connectedness to the next generation. If a Jewish employer can make a link with a Jewish school and know something about the people in these placements, they will feel there is a single community in charge of them. They’ll say, ‘Well…I know the school well enough because my cousin’s kids are there’. That makes it a bit less scary.” 

Unanswered questions

But big questions remain unanswered, including how to determine the Jewish ethos of the centre. Some students want “full-blooded” Jewish textual-based education because they’ve been doing two hours of study of the Talmud every morning.  

JCoSS

“How do we fit that with people for whom their Jewish identity is important, but they don’t want to study it? And to get all that to cohere in one institution?” 

“They told me they were more interested in having the right person for the job, even if it’s the wrong religion, than the wrong person and the right religion.” 

Moriarty had to answer similar quandaries when he joined JCoSS as deputy head in 2010. At the time, starting up the first Jewish school in the UK catering for all the main denominations, rather than being led by just one, was a “ground-breaking” initiative.  

When the headship opportunity came up in 2017 at the same time Moriarty was accepted for training as a priest, he felt obliged to ask the governors: “would you not rather have a Jewish headteacher for your young Jewish school?”  

“They told me they were more interested in having the right person for the job, even if it’s the wrong religion, than the wrong person and the right religion.” 

He sees priesthood as his “vocation” – which to him means “having a sense of calling, a tug that takes you towards making the world a better place”.  

“That’s what I’m after – to change the educational landscape but also transform the economy, maybe just make things better in all sorts of ways.” 

But why, as a priest, not open a Christian vocational college – CV6 perhaps? 

The Church of England has never operated an FE college, but it currently considering a proposal to create a group of colleges from existing institutions that it says share its “overall ethos, values and approach to education though not necessarily its theological outlook”. 

The insider-outsider

Patrick Moriarty at JCoSS

If Moriarty’s plan doesn’t come off, there is a twinkle in his eyes as he suggests he could indeed set up a Christian T Levels centre – perhaps in Hertfordshire where he has recently become a deputy lieutenant – under the auspices of the diocesan board of education, or perhaps as a non-denominational centre. 

But there are the practical reasons why he wants to launch a Jewish college: “I want to start with the community that I know and understand. I know what the levers are, not just the funders but who is really great on governance and who has links at the DfE.” 

There are more profound reasons too.

“The honest answer is, I really like being an insider-outsider in the community. On some psychological level, something in me responds to it. I wanted to be the champion of this community, but it’s not my community. I’m forever preaching sermons at church, trying to get people to understand the Jewish context and the roots of Christianity. Then at JCoSS, I brought a different perspective.” 

His dream is to set up a college that has “the kudos of university”; that, when the community are “sat around the Shabbat table talking about what their children are doing, they can say ‘well, my child is at Jewish vocational college’. I want them to feel proud of that”.  

Pupil premium plus pilot expanded to help more disadvantaged over-16s

The government has expanded a pilot programme to support looked-after teenagers and care leavers beyond the age of 16. The number of authorities involved in the scheme has now nearly doubled.

Following an evaluation of a six-month pilot involving 30 local authorities in 2021/22, the Department for Education this week confirmed that it is continuing the pupil premium plus scheme from September 2022 until July 2023.

An additional 28 local authorities are now involved, making 58 in total, and a further £5 million has been committed.

The pupil premium is grant funding provided to schools to support the attainment of disadvantaged pupils from reception to year 11. Pupil premium plus is for the same age range specifically for pupils who are looked after or leaving local authority care.

The original post-16 pupil premium plus pilot ran from October 2021 until the end of March 2022 with an allocation of £900 per pupil – less than half the £2,345 per pupil for those on the scheme aged up to 16.

Research carried out by the University of Oxford’s Rees Centre was published by the DfE before Christmas. It found that the pilot strengthened relationships between virtual schools heads, colleges and social workers, and resulted in tailored interventions such as work to boost attendance of youngsters and provide enrichment activities to motivate them.

The report recommended the DfE commission a longer-term evaluation. It urged it to extend the pilot to all local authorities, extend funding beyond the age of 18 for those still in or newly entering education and extend provision beyond further education colleges to include years 12 and 13 in schools and those on apprenticeships or employment programmes.

It also called for the DfE to make the role of FE lead a statutory one to work in the same way as the designated teacher role in schools, and help FE leads to access secondary school data to support planning for those students.

The DfE said it was carefully considering the report’s findings and has not yet enacted all the recommendations. But it said the evaluation “highlights the positive impact of the £3 million funding across the 30 pilot sites”.

The pilot extension would help it to “further develop effective practice and bolster the evidence on how best to improve outcomes for looked-after children and care leavers in 16 to 19 education”.

Ofsted accused of being ‘unfair’ on off-the-job training again after ‘inadequate’ report

Another apprenticeship provider has accused Ofsted of being “unfair” after the watchdog judged the company as ‘inadequate’ mostly due to a lack of off-the-job training.

Excelsis Training Limited faces being kicked out of the apprenticeship market owing to the rating and expects to make around 30 redundancies as a result.

Ofsted’s report on the provider, which trains almost 250 apprentices mostly in childcare and healthcare sectors, said that leaders “do not ensure that apprentices receive their entitlement to training time” due to the demands of their roles and “too often” have to “study outside of their working hours”.

Other criticism included that apprentices’ progress has been “slowed by too many changes of teaching staff”, “too many lack the motivation to complete their apprenticeship”, and a poorly planned curriculum.

The provider also offers apprenticeships in digital marketing and hospitality to fill skills shortages, but Ofsted found leaders have offered apprenticeships in a range of different industries “without enough understanding of each sector to ensure the success of the programme”.

Excelsis’s managing director Olufemi Osinaike blamed the ‘inadequate’ grade on Covid, adding that he thought the judgement was “harsh”.

“I think it is unfair – Covid was not taken into consideration, the employment crisis in the health sector wasn’t taken into consideration, and as a result they made the judgement that is totally not true,” he told FE Week.

“We started delivering apprenticeships in 2020 in the main part of Covid. After Covid it has been a crisis within the healthcare sector, an employment crisis especially. A lot of people are leaving their jobs in the sector and leaving the industry completely. It means the people remaining don’t have the time [for off the job training] – they have to do two-to-three people’s jobs.

“We can we put people on breaks in learning and withdraw people, but we made a slight allowance – not even a big allowance – around off-the-job training, as long as they can prove they are spending X amount of time on their qualification.”

Excelsis is the latest in a string of providers to complain that Ofsted has failed to take into consideration the impact of the pandemic in ‘inadequate’ reports. Some have tried and failed to challenge the grades legally.

Osinaike said he is waiting for the Education and Skills Funding Agency to terminate Excelsis’ apprenticeships contract. His provider plans to turn its focus to commercial training.

MOVERS AND SHAKERS: EDITION 410

Rebekah Wilkins

Director of Marketing and Admissions, Wycliffe College

Start date: January 2023

Previous Job: Director of Marketing, Sales and Learner Services, City of Bristol College

Interesting fact: Rebekah is a keen runner and has completed 11 marathons. Her love of running goes to work, with her introducing a C25K group at City of Bristol College


David Malone

Principal & CEO, Calderdale College

Start date: January 2023


Previous Job: Deputy Principal, Chesterfield College

Interesting fact: Since the last time David appeared in movers and shakers in 2017,
he still has not completed a marathon… but hopefully 2023 is the year!

Social mobility tsar quits: ‘I’m doing more harm than good’

Headteacher Katharine Birbalsingh has quit as Social Mobility Commission chair, saying her controversial opinions “puts the commission in jeopardy” and it is doing “more harm than good”.

The commission’s deputy and Oldham College principal Alun Francis has been appointed interim chair.

Birbalsingh – Britain’s so-called “strictest headteacher” at Michaela Community School in London – was appointed to lead the commission in November 2021. 

The outspoken leader has always courted controversy. While social mobility tsar, she was widely criticised after telling a parliamentary committee hearing that low uptake of physics among girls was because they would rather not do “hard maths”.

But her comments about shifting the social mobility focus away from people going to Oxbridge were inaccurately reported by a national newspaper, leading to a correction.

Writing exclusively for FE Week, Birbalsingh said she “comes with too much baggage” and is doing the commission “more harm than good”. 

She said: “Over this past year, I have become increasingly aware that my propensity to voice opinions that are considered controversial puts the commission in jeopardy.” 

Birbalsingh cites her inaugural speech in last June, where she said the focus has been too much on those going to Oxbridge or becoming top lawyers. 

She had hoped her new narrative about “how we too often have too narrow a view of social mobility” might be “received with interest”.

But instead she claims “the press insisted that I personally believe ‘working class people should stay in their lane’”.

The Telegraph’s headline ran as “working class people should aim ‘lower’ than Oxbridge” – but they later issued an apology saying it did not reflect Birbalsingh’s views. 

But she said the “damage had already been done,” adding: “I am still to this day attacked for my apparently abhorrent views on social mobility.” 

‘I don’t want to be a politician’

Birbalsingh said she will now “carefully craft my utterances to leave no room for misinterpreting me and misrepresenting the commission”. 

“Instead of going out there to bat for the team and celebrate our achievements, I am becoming a politician. And I can’t bear the idea of ever being a politician. It just isn’t who I am or a skillset I wish to develop.

“As headmistress at Michaela, my governors can decide whether or not they wish to employ me despite my outspoken nature. So I feel free to comment on society.

“But as chair of the commission, people feel I need to be impartial and it irks many that for many years I have been anything but. So in some people’s minds, I am not right for the job.

“Sadly, I have come to agree.”

However in April last year, Birbalsingh was widely criticised after her comments on why girls do not take physics.

She told MPs: “I just think they don’t like it. There’s a lot of hard maths in there that I think they would rather not do.”

Most recently, the commission pledged to investigate which teaching styles work best to boost outcomes for poorer pupils, with critics questioning whether this would just recommend the approaches employed by Michaela.

Michaela has been dubbed the strictest school in the country, with silent corridors and other controversial policies such as ditching SEND labels and giving detentions for failing to have a pen.

Birbalsingh said while the commission team have been supportive, “I worry that all of our excellent work will be ignored by virtue of my presence”.

She claimed critics “could not imagine that I might have the integrity to publish unbiased research, whatever conclusions it came to.”

“So my hands are tied. My being chair means no commission analysis of what works in schools will be valued or respected, and education is crucial to social mobility.

“Leaving before key research takes place on schools also allows that work to happen without my perceived influence.”

Call for ‘superhero’ deputy to take the lead

Birbalsingh now calls for her deputy Alun Francis, principal at Oldham College, to take over the role permanently.

“He is utterly brilliant – a social mobility superhero with an encyclopaedic knowledge of the subject and without doubt the best person for the job. 

“I have learned an enormous amount doing this important work, and I am sad to go, but I look forward to supporting the work of this amazing team from the outside – where I won’t hold it back.”

Francis said: “I am very pleased to accept the role of interim chair of the Social Mobility Commission.

“The commission has had a fantastic twelve months, from launching our first State of the Nation report to making great progress on our research priorities.

“The SMC continues to go from strength to strength, and I look forward to working with the Minister for Women and Equalities to continue to champion social mobility across Britain.”

The government said arrangements for a new permanent chair will be “announced in due course”.

Ofqual disbands standards committee

Ofqual is disbanding its committee of experts who advise on exam standards and will instead take a “more flexible approach” on policy advice.

The standards advisory group (SAG), a committee of the Ofqual board, was set up more than a decade ago to help the exams watchdog maintain the standards of qualifications.

Members included independent assessment specialists from leading exam boards and universities, including Dr Mike Cresswell, ex-chief executive of the exam board AQA, and Professor Jo-Anne Baird, director of the University of Oxford’s Department of Education.

But Ofqual confirmed this week the committee will be replaced to reflect the watchdog’s “broader remit”, such as expansions in vocational and technical qualifications as well as apprenticeships.

It will take a “more flexible approach, drawing on a range of experts for specific programmes of work.

This will continue to provide Ofqual with objective external advice as needed.

”This could include working with experts who already advise the regulator or introducing new ones to ensure “that we can use the right people for the right work” in assessment.

Professor Barnaby Lenon, a former member of the committee, said the move was a “good decision” as long as the experts “are still used to help Ofqual think outside their bubble”.

“Assessment methodology is an arcane but important science. The few experts that exist, often lurking in dusty cupboards on the periphery of exam boards, are really important.

“The best have memories that go back decades and can recall what has worked and what has (often) been a disaster.

They often have international experience and can draw on that to provide some perspective on England’s systems.”

Another committee member, Dr Tina Isaacs, honorary senior lecturer in educational assessment at the UCL Institute of Education, was also supportive.

“My impression is that it wants to be more nimble and get expert opinions – many of which I believe will come from former SAG members – in a more proactive way.”

Other recent members include Daisy Christodoulou, director at No More Marking, William Pointer, AQA’s head of standards and awarding, and Isabel Sutcliffe, former international standards and quality director at Pearson.

Ofqual has faced much upheaval following criticism over decisions and communication during the Covid exam fiascos.

Dr Jo Saxton is the third chief regulator since Sally Collier resigned in August 2020.


The regulator also confirmed this week that Michael Hanton, its strategy executive
director who joined in 2013, has been promoted to deputy chief regulator.

He replaced Julie Swan who left for the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

Hanton said he “firmly” believes “in the value of good regulation in securing quality and fairness for all those who take and use qualifications”.

Why I’m leaving the social mobility commission

In November 2021, I was appointed chair of the social mobility commission, an advisory body of the Cabinet Office that conducts research and monitors the country’s progress in improving social mobility. Today, I am stepping down from that role.

It has been a successful and enjoyable year. We published our state of the nation report showcasing our new social mobility index. We set out an ambitious research programme focusing on themes such as education and families. Our most recent report highlights how missing data limits our understanding and holds us back. We launched our ‘Quarterly Commentary’ and a podcast series. And for my part, I am most proud of appointing our amazing director, John Craven, a man who has my utmost respect.

So why am I stepping down?

The simple answer is that I come with too much baggage. Over this past year, I have become increasingly aware that my propensity to voice opinions that are considered controversial puts the commission in jeopardy.

When I gave my inaugural speech in June last year, I spoke about how we often have too narrow a view of social mobility: we often imagine the feel-good rags-to-riches trope of Hollywood movies when there are so many other mobilities we could and should celebrate. Of course, that doesn’t mean that those who achieve the ambition of going to Oxbridge shouldn’t be admired too – only that not everyone has to go to Oxbridge to be admired.

We had hoped that this new narrative might be received with interest. Instead, the press insisted that I personally believe ‘working class people should stay in their lane’. Other interesting points were then lost amid the outrage. A tiny apology was published days later, but the damage had already been done. I am still to this day attacked for my apparently abhorrent views on social mobility.

Over time, it affected how the team and I would approach interviews. I would have to carefully craft my utterances to leave no room for misinterpreting me and misrepresenting the commission. At the end of a recent interview, I realised that my idea of a successful discussion was now one where I manage to avoid giving opinions that might bring attention to the commission. Instead of going out there to bat for the team and celebrate our achievements, I am becoming a politician. And I can’t bear the idea of ever being a politician. It just isn’t who I am or a skillset I wish to develop.

On balance, I am doing the social mobility commission more harm than good

As headmistress at Michaela, my governors can decide whether or not they wish to employ me despite my outspoken nature. So I feel free to comment on society. But as chair of the commission, people feel I need to be impartial and it irks many that for many years I have been anything but. So in some people’s minds, I am not right for the job.

Sadly, I have come to agree. The commission team have been nothing but supportive, but I worry that all of our excellent work will be ignored by virtue of my presence. When I tweeted how excited I was to see the commission’s analysis of what works in helping disadvantaged kids achieve at school, some responded that if our work were to find evidence to back what we do at Michaela, they would be suspicious. These weren’t even our detractors, but they could not imagine that I might have the integrity to publish unbiased research, whatever conclusions it came to. They insisted that our work could not be taken seriously.

Others suggested the commission should outsource its work on schools to avoid its analysis being tainted by me. But research is the team’s job, and while some of it can be outsourced, to outsource all of it would be a colossal waste of taxpayers’ money.

So my hands are tied. My being chair means no commission analysis of what works in schools will be valued or respected as it should, and education is crucial to social mobility. By contrast, with my deputy, Alun Francis as chair, people will listen to the same evidence and believe in its integrity. All that excellent work will be productive, useful and successful in ways that I could only hope to do.

On balance then, I am doing the social mobility commission more harm than good. Over the past couple of months, it has become clear to me that Alun Francis ought to be chair. My being in the post for a year has allowed the Oldham College principal to find his feet, but he is now in a stronger position than I am to take the commission to the next step. He is utterly brilliant – a social mobility superhero with an encyclopaedic knowledge of the subject and without doubt the best person for the job.

The commissioners are ready to take his lead, our director is firmly in post and the secretariat team is in the perfect position for Alun to take over the reins. Leaving before key research takes place on schools also allows that work to happen without my perceived influence.

Bids for at least 6 ‘elite’ sixth forms formally submitted

Applications for at least six new “elite” sixth forms have been lodged in the latest wave of free school bids – in areas where ministers want to boost standards.

More details have also emerged of two bids for new university technical colleges in England. A third UTC is also in the pipeline.

The Department for Education published a list of more than 60 applications shortly before Christmas for wave 15 of the free school programme. Just 15 of these are expected to be approved.

Among the bids for new elite sixth forms are three “unashamedly academic” Eton and Star Academies colleges proposed in Dudley, Oldham and Teesside.

The government has committed to opening “a number” of “high-quality, academic focused” 16 to 19 free schools in education investment areas. EIAs are regions with the lowest student outcomes that have been promised extra support.

The move has proven controversial with fears it will lead to “selection for a lucky few”. A study last year found elite sixth forms taught few poorer pupils and recruited heavily from neighbouring areas.

But Eton (main image) and Star have pledged to focus on young people from the most deprived communities. The organisations told FE Week that each college’s curriculum could “evolve to meet contemporary demands of business in the local areas”.

For instance, pathways to degree-level programmes in biomedical science and STEM (science, technology, engineering and maths) subjects in Teesside could be introduced to support the chemical engineering industry there. The sixth forms will have capacity for 480 students.

There are also plans for an all-girls elite sixth form in Bradford specialising in STEM subjects, to be known as iExcel Elite STEM 6th Form College and sponsored by the Feversham Education Trust.

Cornwall School of Mathematics and Science (CSMS) has lodged a bid for an elite academic sixth form, while The Mercian Trust has applied for one to serve Sandwell and Walsall, to be known as Mercian Sixth – The Queen Mary’s Partnership.

CSMS principal Emma Haase said the 450-capacity Cornwall Academy of Excellence would offer a “full suite of A-level qualifications” and aims to help Cornish teenagers into university.

The Mercian Trust hopes its sixth form will be open for up to 600 students by September 2025.

The trust said it would offer a mix of A-levels and T Levels and include a focus on STEM subjects, hoping to progress students onto university and apprenticeship places in the technology, engineering and digital sectors.

Elsewhere, a BRIT School for 14 to 19-year olds is planned in Bradford as an expansion of the Croydon school which boasts Adele, Amy Winehouse and Rizzle Kicks among its alumni.

A spokesperson from the British Phonographic Industry, which funds the BRIT School, said its school in the north would make the industry “more inclusive and accessible for all, regardless of background”.

Bids for new UTCs confirmed

Two university technical college (UTCs) bids have been submitted alongside those for schools and sixth forms.

UTC Portsmouth is behind plans for a UTC in Southampton for young people aged 14 to 19. It said its Portsmouth offering has been “heavily oversubscribed for a number of years”.

UTC Portsmouth

James Doherty, UTC Portsmouth principal, said “many students currently make the journey from Southampton to UTC Portsmouth”.

He added: “In response to requests from new and existing industry partners, and from prospective students for more of what we do, we felt it would be an excellent opportunity for the young people of Southampton to found a second institution here.”

Doncaster UTC has also lodged plans for a health sciences and green technologies school, The college did not respond to requests for comment at the time of publication, but its application has confirmed it would serve those aged 11 to 19.

The Baker Dearing Trust said in November that it hoped to submit bids for three UTCs, but work on the third bid in Suffolk is understood to be ongoing and likely to be submitted in a subsequent round.

Simon Connell, chief executive of the Baker Dearing Trust, said: “Both these bids are based on a need and demand for technical education and skilled workers in their areas.

“Doncaster UTC and UTC Portsmouth are oversubscribed and employers in their areas are crying out for high-quality, widespread technical education provision.”

Struggling college faces apprenticeships ban

A college that has battled through perilous financial challenges is set to be banned from delivering apprenticeships after Ofsted judged the provision ‘inadequate’, FE Week understands.

Coventry College will receive its third consecutive overall grade three report in the coming weeks but is expected to see its grade for apprenticeships drop to a four.

The college was unable to comment on the report itself ahead of publication, but a spokesperson suggested their focus in recent years has had to be on finances after almost going insolvent while being aware of the “challenges faced across some areas of our provision”.

Under Education and Skills Funding Agency rules, colleges and training providers which receive an ‘inadequate’ grade are removed from the register of apprenticeship training providers, meaning they can no longer offer the provision.

Coventry College’s recently published accounts for 2022 show that it enrolled 5,729 learners in total, 377 of whom were apprentices.

A 2020 FE Commissioner intervention report detailed how a lack of “clear post-merger strategy” – following the college’s formation from a merger between Henley College Coventry and City College Coventry in 2017 – and “robust scrutiny” led to a “substantial deterioration of financial stability”, which led to it almost going bust.

The college then recruited Carol Thomas as principal and she appears to have improved its finances.

Its 2022 accounts show an overall surplus of £1 million compared to a deficit of £4.7 million in 2021, cash balances of £5.8 million, and an ESFA financial health rating of ‘good’. It’s financial notice to improve was closed last year.

The turnaround includes the closure and future sale of the college’s Henley campus.

Thomas’ salary increased from £145,000 in 2021 to £156,000 in 2022, according to the college’s accounts. But the college’s quality of education has failed to improve according to Ofsted.

The forthcoming report will be its second ‘requires improvement’ grade since merger. Henley College and City College Coventry were both also a grade three before the merger and the latter had previously been judged ‘inadequate’ on two occasions.

A Coventry College spokesperson said: “We can stress that, since the last Ofsted inspection in September 2019, Coventry College has been on a major transformation to safeguard its future as a standalone institution. The need to secure its future financially was imperative and this required a campus consolidation strategy to be executed effectively.”

The spokesperson told FE Week that the FE Commissioner’s team had described the college’s improvements as “one of the best turnarounds in the sector”.

But they added: “We had been through a robust self-assessment process and were aware of the strengths and weaknesses at Coventry College, particularly the challenges faced across some areas of our provision.

“We are fully committed to continuing to invest in the resources and strategies required to secure improvements in all areas at the next Ofsted inspection.”

[UPDATE: After this article was published the college told FE Week the principal’s salary stated in its accounts includes an additional contribution for relocation benefits, which are approved annually and not guaranteed. The principal’s basic salary is actually £141,000 and has not changed in the past two years.]