‘Inadequate’ UTC issued with termination warning notice

A university technical college in Bolton with a turbulent history has been issued a funding termination warning notice over concerns about the “inadequate standard of education”.

The Department for Education published the notice this morning addressed to board members and trustees of the multi-academy trust Quest, over concerns raised at its University Collegiate School, formerly known as Bolton UTC.

It follows a damning Ofsted report published in February in which inspectors rated the 11 to 18 school ‘inadequate’ in all areas – a fall from its ‘good’ rating in 2019 but the second time in its past it was lumped with the watchdog’s bottom judgement.

The warning notice said leaders, trustees and members of the local advisory committee have “overseen an inadequate standard of education for all pupils, including students in the sixth form,” and had “not demonstrated the capacity to tackle these considerable weaknesses”.

It added that they had “failed in their duties to keep pupils and students safe”.

The letter exposed “tensions” between governors and the board of trustees that was hindering the speed at which leaders could make improvements, and continued that “some pupils and staff feel unsafe” as a result of a lack of coherent oversight on safeguarding.

It described the curriculum as “underdeveloped” and “not suitably broad and balanced”, while concerns were raised around a lack of appropriate assessment systems or measures to identify students’ gaps in learning.

Students with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) receive a “poor quality education” as a result of systems not identifying their needs, the notice added.

The Department for Education’s north west regional director Vicky Beer said: “I need to be satisfied that the trust has capacity to deliver rapid and sustainable improvement at the academy. If I am not satisfied that this can be achieved, I will consider whether to terminate the funding agreement in order to transfer the academy to an alternative academy trust.”

Crispin Pailing, chair of the directors at Quest, said a host of changes had already been made, which included appointing an “experienced head with a track record of school improvement” as interim principal and a new vice-principal, as well as suspending the local governing body’s powers.

In addition, Pailing said staff received further training on behaviour and safeguarding while a safeguarding expert has also been working to change some day-to-day procedures.

The trust said an interim executive board was in place chaired by a former principal of an ‘outstanding’ school, assuming responsibility for improvement work and reporting to the main trust board and the DfE.

Pailing added: “We are very sorry for the failures which were identified through the Ofsted inspection. We have taken swift and decisive action to introduce a school improvement plan which will address every point raised by the inspectors. Bolton UCS and Quest will be working with the regional director and the DfE to address the concerns raised in the termination warning notice.

“With new leadership, governance, and procedures in place, I am confident that our school improvement plan will achieve the rapid and effective change necessary to ensure an environment where students and staff at Bolton University Collegiate School can prosper.”

The UTC opened in 2015 for students aged 14 to 19 under the name Bolton UTC, but was stung by an ‘inadequate’ Ofsted report at its first full inspection in February 2017.

Year 11 and 13 students told inspectors at the time they had been “sold a dream”.

Whistleblower reports which emerged a year later then prompted an investigation over the struggling UTC’s finances, which found financial decisions that had gone unchallenged and “inadequate” financial controls in relation to a lack of an audit committee or financial checks.

The Education and Skills Funding Agency told the college it must join a “strong” multi-academy trust to drive improvement.

The establishment received better news in April 2019 when it received a ‘good’ inspection rating following a series of monitoring visits, before the UTC joined Quest on August 1, 2020 and was subsequently renamed.

But a fresh inspection by Ofsted at the end of 2022 found standards had declined once again and an ‘inadequate’ rating was published in February this year.

The UTC has a capacity of 600 students with 394 learners on its roll.

The warning notice has compelled the UTC to provide clear evidence of improvements to safeguarding, leadership and governance, behaviour, curriculum planning and education standards and a school improvement strategy, in order to retain its funding agreement.

The deadline for evidence to be presented was Tuesday this week, with an assessment of that information and a decision on whether the trust can improve the UTC now set to be made.

Since their inception in 2010, 13 UTCs have closed, with the most recently announced being Watford UTC which confirmed it will close its doors at the end of the academic year.

MOVERS AND SHAKERS: EDITION 420

Audrey Nelson

Trustee, WorldSkills UK

Start date: Match 2023

Concurrent job: Strategic Communications Specialist

Interesting fact: Audrey’s true passion is music, having started out performing in Gilbert & Sullivan operettas. Her favourite treat now is a visit to the Royal Opera House.


Sean Wellington

Trustee, WorldSkills UK

Start date: March 2023

Concurrent job: Provost & Deputy Vice-Chancellor, Middlesex University

Interesting fact: Sean is a music fan and loves reading reviews of home audio gear that he will never own.


Justin Rix

Trustee, WorldSkills UK

Start date: March 2023

Concurrent job: Partner – people advisory practice, Grant Thornton LLP

Interesting fact: Justin is a never more happy than by or indeed on the sea, a keen sailor with a very ancient sailing boat which takes nearly as much time and effort in keeping seaworthy as it does to sail.


Mark Farrar

Trustee, WorldSkills UK

Start date: March 2023

Previous job: Former CEO of the Association of Accounting Technicians and previously CEO of the Construction Industry Training Board

Interesting fact: As well as sailing and racing offshore, Mark once took a yacht through Amsterdam’s central canals early one morning.


Overwhelmed learners drop out at ‘inadequate’ provider

Apprentices with an East Sussex provider were so “overwhelmed” and demotivated by a lack of off-the-job training that they quickly dropped out, an Ofsted report has found.

Bestland Solutions Ltd, which has 20 years’ experience and trades as Training Associates, largely delivers adult care apprenticeships and had more than 552 learners on its books at the time of the inspection in mid-December.

Inspectors rated the provider ‘inadequate’ in all areas, finding that too many apprentices were “significantly behind” in their work and teaching was not consistently well-planned or structured.

Ofsted reported that leaders did not ensure apprentices received their off-the-job training entitlement, adding: “As a result, too many apprentices feel overwhelmed, lack motivation and quickly drop out of their apprenticeship.”

Too few apprentices benefitted from developing their wider skills or guidance on possible carer pathways, Ofsted said.

It continued that “too many apprentices lack engagement and do not attend training or reviews well,” while not enough completed the required English and maths standards needed to qualify. It said that in some instances it was a result of pressures in the care sector.

Elsewhere, the report said that quality assurance mechanisms were not used effectively, while leaders didn’t ensure employers were routinely involved in curriculum planning.

Tutors didn’t benefit enough from upskilling or research opportunities and leaders didn’t ensure apprenticeship content was structured appropriately, according to the report.

Inspectors found that most apprentices didn’t benefit from “useful, purposeful target setting” to help them improve, and feedback from tutors didn’t always help apprentices improve their work.

Education and Skills Funding Agency guidelines say that ‘inadequate’ providers will be struck off the register of apprenticeship training providers, putting funding and provision under threat.

Bestland did not respond to requests for comment at the time of going to press.

Flex on UKSPF skills funding ‘welcome’ but timing questioned

The government has brought forward by a year the start date for a new fund for skills investment.

The timing of the announcement, made just days ahead of the revised start date, has led to concern that local leaders’ hands will already be tied and providers will be unable to capitalise on the move.

The people and skills element of the UK Shared Prosperity Fund is designed to help economically inactive adults into work through skills interventions.

Spending the cash had been restricted until April 2024, but the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (DLUHC) said on Thursday that it will remove that restriction from April 2023.

DLUHC confirmed that authorities have already been allocated the cash and the start date for it has been moved forward.

However, concerns have been raised that many authorities will have already committed all of their allocation to the previous timeline, leaving them unable to take advantage of the change.

Stephen Evans, chief executive of Learning and Work Institute, said: “This flex is definitely welcome and helps to minimise gaps in support – a temporary reduction in help that never made sense in the first place.

“But the fact that it’s so late in the day means that local areas already have other plans in place, that some existing programmes will already have closed and that putting in place new support will take time.”

Evans said he hoped local areas will “do all they can to make good use of these flexibilities” to ensure “proper investment in people, learning and skills”.

The DLUHC update said the fund is “well-aligned” to meeting the prime minister’s goal of boosting skills capability, and be “the main source of funding to support economically inactive individuals move towards employment”.

It said that the removal of the restriction will “maximise the impact of the fund in this area”.

The UKSPF launched in April last year, with the funding period running from April 2022 to March 2025.

It replaced the European Social Fund (ESF) which had been delivered through the European Union and was therefore no longer available to the UK post-Brexit.

Three priorities are being delivered through the fund – communities and place, supporting local business and people and skills.

The communities and place funding was able to be used from the launch last April, while the other two portions can be spent from this April (year two of the fund).

In addition, ringfenced funding is provided to authorities through the UKSPF to deliver the Multiply programme – the government scheme for adults without a grade C or above in maths to access free courses that will help them gain a maths qualification.

The £1.58 billion fund for England over the three years has been allocated to ten mayoral combined authorities and Greater London, 50 unitary authorities, 165 district and borough councils and 23 upper tier authorities.

Babergh and Mid Suffolk district councils were among those to secure a slice of the cash – just over £1 million for Babergh and around £1.1 million for Mid Suffolk.

But allocations for year two of the fund have already been set.

A spokesperson for the two authorities said: “All of our year two projects have already been identified and projects are in commissioning stage with all funding committed. We will not seek to change the year two funding allocations.

“The outcomes and targets for the whole UKSPF programme have been signed off via our investment plan by DLUHC, there is no current opportunity to change these targets and add additional skills projects to the existing plan.

“We are working with Suffolk County Council [the local education authority] on commissioning skills projects for delivery in year three.”

Others have welcomed the move.

Graham Wood, economic development manager at the unitary authority Durham County Council, which was given £30.8 million in core UKSPF funding, said the council had shared its concern that funding people and skills from 2024 only would “create a real terms gap in provision of employment support programmes and wide-ranging upskilling opportunities”.

He added that the announcement “will allow us to advance our emerging plans for employment and skills activity”.

A spokesperson for the mayor of London said: “It’s vital that Londoners have the right skills to get good jobs in the industries that need them, which is why the mayor has long called for the government to bring forward the people and skills element of its Shared Prosperity Fund.

“City Hall officers will now work to establish when programmes can realistically start, given the late confirmation by government.”

Greater Manchester Combined Authority welcomed the move. Officials had already been working to align its recycled local growth fund cash with the skills and people element of the UKSPF that would effectively have brought forward the UKSPF cash by a year.

New WorldSkills UK trustees want ‘world-class skills boosts’

A communications expert, a lawyer and a university vice chancellor are among new appointments to the board of WorldSkills UK. 

Included among the new trustees, announced today, is Mark Farrar, who has previously led of the Association of Accounting Technicians and the Construction Industry Training Board as chief executive. Farrar is also on the board of exams watchdog Ofqual and was a governor at Barking and Dagenham College until July 2021. 

“Raising standards in training through international benchmarking will not only boost productivity and competitiveness, but also help attract the foreign investment the UK needs to create high wage jobs in growth sectors like digital, green tech, advanced manufacturing and life sciences,” he said. 

The announcement comes as WorldSkills UK today closes the registration period for providers and employers to register students and apprentices for the UK national skills competitions, which kick off with qualifying rounds from next month and culminate with national finals in November.

The new board members will be joining the organisation at it prepares to improve the UK’s position in the international skills competition medal tables at WorldSkills Lyon next year. 

One of the first tasks for the new board members will be to appoint a successor to Neil Bentley-Gockmann, WorldSkills UK’s chief executive, who is stepping down in May after seven years. 

Joining Farrar is Audrey Nelson, a strategic communications specialist who has held senior communications roles in organisations such as the CBI and the Home Office. Nelson said she “looks forward to demonstrating how investment in world-class skills boosts economic growth and is a catalyst for innovation and opportunity”.

Also enlisted are new trustees Justin Rix and Sean Wellington. Rix, a partner at professional services firm Grant Thornton UK LLP, said he is “driven by a passion for getting the very best out of people and helping to empower rising stars.”

“I am really pleased to have joined an organisation that thrives on providing opportunities and developing talent,” he said.

And Wellington, a former engineering apprentice and now provost and deputy vice-chancellor of the Middlesex University, said: “The competition-based training programmes run by WorldSkills UK give young people a real opportunity to boost their skills and their career prospects.”

(Feature image L-R: Justin Rix, Sean Wellington, Mark Farrar and Audrey Nelson)

West Midlands reveals ‘bold’ plan to boost level 3 training

Workers in the West Midlands earning up to £30,000 a year will be in line for free adult education under plans to boost access to level 3 training.

Officials at the West Midlands Combined Authority (WMCA) released a set of proposals in a public consultation last Friday which they hope will help boost employment and earnings.

The combined authority, covering Birmingham, Coventry, Dudley, Sandwell, Solihull, Walsall and Wolverhampton, said their region has fewer residents qualified to level 3 than other parts of the country.

One proposal, to increase eligibility for subsidies currently only available to low earners to middle earners on £30,000, would be the most generous in the country.

WMCA also plans to require its grant-funded providers to ensure at least 20 per cent of their AEB provision is at level 3 and has pledged to review learner support funding in response to “additional cost-related barriers” facing local adults.

Subsidies for middle earners

Across AEB funding bodies, low wage learners typically have access to fully funded courses at levels 2 and 3, and access to courses under the free courses for jobs scheme and other local priority level 3 courses.

The full funding of low earning learners who would otherwise be eligible for co-funding was introduced to the Education and Skills Funding Agency’s AEB funding rules in 2018/19.

The agency defines “low wage” learners in this year’s funding rules as earning less than £18,525, based on the national living wage.

Devolved authorities have all adopted the low wage policy but have been more generous than the ESFA in how they define “low wage” (see table).

Most now use the real living wage (£10.90 per hour) as the basis for their definition, which is higher than the national living wage (£9.50 per hour).

The West Midlands is now proposing to increase their threshold to £30,000, which would be the highest in the country, in a two-year trial beginning in August 2023, subject to the consultation.

They are following in the footsteps of Tees Valley Combined Authority, which this year raised its low wage threshold to £27,040 using local median earnings, rather than the living wage.

“We are proposing to set our low wage threshold at £30,000, just below the median pay for full-time jobs across the WMCA area (£30,634). We believe this would reflect a bold commitment to tackling low pay and supporting in-work progression across the region,” WMCA’s consultation document said.

The consultation states that the WMCA is aware that upping the threshold creates a “risk of deadweight”, targeting specific groups of learners or sectors would “make messaging more complex and would likely reduce overall impact.”

Proposals will be funded from existing AEB and free courses for jobs programme budgets, WMCA confirmed.

Table showing low wage thresholds across adult education funding bodies
Low wage thresholds across adult education funding bodies

New minimum volumes

Just over £100 million of WMCA’s £131 million adult education budget is allocated out to 27 providers through grant funding, 21 of which are colleges, with the rest split between WEA and local authorities.

As part of a push to go “further and faster”, the WMCA wants the grant providers it funds to ensure that at least 20 per cent of their AEB provision is at level 3.

This could prove trickier for some providers, particularly local authorities that offer very little provision at level 3 and instead specialise in non-accredited and lower level courses. 

Fiona Adridge, head of insight and intelligence at the WMCA told FE Week: “We believe it is possible for grant providers to both excel in providing pathways up to level 2 as well as to expand delivery at level 3. As part of the consultation, we will be engaging with our local authorities to explore how we can best work together to achieve this.”

Qualifications for FE Workforce

The consultation also proposes to fully fund qualifications for FE staff to support providers to “‘grow their own’ and develop talent in the region”.

It is proposed that the WMCA will fund qualifications for teaching assistants at level 3, advice and guidance professionals at level 4, ESOL teachers at level 5 and aspiring leaders, also at level 5, to help providers with recruitment and retention challenges.

“We recognise that while colleges and training providers have access to support for their own staff development, this is limited and does not usually extend beyond level 3,” the consultation states.

Interested stakeholders have until 10am April 21, 2023 to respond to the consultation which can be found on the WMCA’s website.

DfE’s transgender guidance will include colleges

Official government guidance on provision for transgender students will be expanded to include further education colleges, the education secretary has said.

The Department for Education has been working on the guidance for schools over the past year amid calls for clarity on how leaders should respond to “complex and sensitive” transgender matters.

Gillian Keegan has now written to Robin Walker, chair of the education select committee, to confirm that draft guidance will be released and consulted on “later in the spring”.

She added that the department recently expanded the scope of the guidance to include further education colleges, “as we know that colleges also need clarity and support in relation to their students who are under 18 years old”.

“I appreciate the demand for this guidance is significant, however, this is such a complex and sensitive area, I am sure you will understand that it is incredibly important that we take the time to get the guidance right,” Keegan wrote.

Ofsted chief inspector Amanda Spielman told the commons education committee in November that there was an “urgent” need for government guidance to help education providers navigate a “minefield” of “deeply contested issues” given the “evolution in the interpretation” of the protected characteristics in equality law.

Keegan said in December that the DfE needs to be clear that the new transgender guidance is “based on safeguarding and evidence and not an attempt to balance contested views amongst children who are not old enough to entertain those ideas”.

College leaders have welcomed the decision to extend the guidance, with many of them unsure how best to accommodate transgender and non-binary students in areas such as sport, toilet facilities, and overnight trips.

A spokesperson for the Sixth Form Colleges Association said: “Individual institutions have had to navigate this complex and sensitive issue without a clear steer from government, often receiving conflicting advice from legal and other sources.”

The SFCA called for the guidance to address 16 to 18s as a distinct group because they are “subject to the same safeguarding considerations as under-16s but not the same medical considerations”.

A spokesperson for the Association of Colleges said: “Colleges are often the first place that people can truly start to work out who they are, and to express themselves freely. We are proud of that and have been working with officials which we hope will result in constructive guidance.

“Colleges across England do brilliant work supporting students of all ages, and we will be pushing DfE to make sure that any new guidance allows this to continue. It is also important to remember that schools and colleges are very different and cover very different age cohort, any guidance should take that into consideration and not attempt a one-size-fits-all approach.”

College group offloads MAT amid compliance review

A leading college group is parting ways with its academy trust amid a governance and compliance review by government.

Luminate Education Group is set to hand over control of its four-school academy trust, White Rose, based in Leeds, to a larger neighbouring multi academy trust (MAT), Wellspring.

FE Week understands the move, sanctioned by the Education and Skills Funding Agency, follows multiple internal and external investigations and a complete relationship breakdown last year between leaders of Luminate and White Rose.

The case shines a light on the challenges college groups face in operating MATs and FE Week can reveal that a government review of college-led MATs is underway in a drive for more effective sponsorships. 

The birth of White Rose

White Rose was created in 2014, when what was then known as Leeds City College Group became sponsor of Leeds City Academy. After the Department for Education divested another MAT, E-ACT, of ten of its schools, two of them – Leeds East and Leeds West – joined White Rose.

In 2019, all three schools were inspected by Ofsted and rated ‘good’, and the trust was allowed to take on another school – Mill Field, renamed Alder Tree Primary.

Following plans in 2021 for savings to be made across the colleges and MAT by sharing central services, a two-year strategy was agreed which Luminate said would have “extended and deepened” the relationship with its trust.

This involved a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) which included the ongoing line management of trust chief executive Andrew Whittaker by Luminate’s chief Colin Booth.

Some members of White Rose’s leadership are understood to have been unhappy with the direction of travel agreed.

Whittaker then made a series of strongly denied allegations over a 15-month period against Luminate to external bodies including Ofsted, Leeds City Council and the ESFA. They resulted in several lengthy investigations.

Luminate said the allegations were “thoroughly investigated by various organisations” and found to be “unsubstantiated”.

They claimed the “long and vexatious complaints made by [Whittaker] have caused significant distress and upset”.

The relationship between Luminate and White Rose was formally suspended by the ESFA in January 2022.

Whittaker was unable to respond to this article for legal reasons.

The ESFA carried out a governance and compliance review into White Rose between March and June 2022 and raised its concerns in a letter.

However, Booth said that the review did not allow Luminate as the sponsor to submit evidence, a complaint that was upheld by the DfE.

Luminate believes therefore that the review is “not complete” and that the letter issued to White Rose “cannot be relied upon at this stage”.

White Rose also launched an investigation into serious concerns about Whittaker’s behaviour, which led to his suspension in September.

White Rose’s trustees and members are understood to be working very closely with the Department for Education, the local authority and Luminate to address issues related to the recent turmoil.

Structural issues

When White Rose was created, the college group chief was made both a member and trustee of the MAT, in line with DfE guidelines at the time.

But in March 2022, Booth stepped down as a director of White Rose – he had been expected to continue until September 2023.

The move followed changes to the academy handbook stating the department’s “strong preference” for “a majority of members to be independent of the board of trustees”, and “for no other employees to serve as trustees”.

Luminate is part of a government-led Pathfinder review into the structural challenges for college groups posed by ESFA rules around MATs.

Luminate – and several other college group leaders involved in the review – take particular issue with handbook rules on transactions with individuals or organisations, including parent college groups, related to trusts.

Luminate claims the rules make close partnership between colleges and schools working “more difficult than it should be” and that the rules are not “an appropriate way to treat two educational charities trying to work together to deliver benefits for students and better value for public money”.

“We think that the rules … have not yet caught up with the much more positive and supportive views of the minister,” the college group said.

“The ESFA rules add unnecessary bureaucracy and cost to what are positive arrangements that provide real and clear benefits for students.”

The proposed takeover

An application to transfer White Rose was submitted to the DfE’s regional director, who this month deferred the decision to allow more information to be gathered.

Wellspring, also a college-led MAT, has 29 schools and plans to grow to include at least four more, on top of White Rose’s.

But while its sponsor, Barnsley College, appointed the original members of the MAT’s board and has the right to appoint directors, the college’s senior leadership team take more of a backseat role.

Luminate said: “It is DfE policy to encourage all single and small MATs to either grow or merge to form larger MATs that then have more and better resources to support their schools and students.

“Both the Luminate Education Group Board and the White Rose Academies Trust Board agree with this policy and are therefore taking action, alongside the DfE, to ensure that the [White Rose] schools are part of a larger and strong MAT for the future. The decision was made collaboratively and not based on a specific recommendation outside of DfE policy.”

HGV driver hopefuls left in the dark as DfE ends bootcamp contract

Much-needed HGV drivers have been left in limbo after a provider’s contract to deliver their training using the government’s flagship skills bootcamp model was suddenly terminated.

Qube Learning has been in discussions with the Department for Education for six months after unforeseen increases in delivery costs made the training for the 16-week course “unviable”.

The DfE this week ended the contract a year after it was awarded. Qube’s owner Claire Capperauld told FE Week that she was “surprised” by the decision and claimed her company had recently been “specifically instructed to contact learners with regards to finishing their training”.

The DfE was tight-lipped about the reason for termination but promised that officials are “working to protect all learners impacted by this situation”.

Both parties have refused to disclose the value of Qube’s contract, or how many learners have been impacted.

Several aspiring drivers caught up in the dispute told FE Week that Qube had previously said that “thousands” were signed up to the course.

Many of the “gutted” and “frustrated” learners enrolled 12 months ago but never received any training. They have slammed Qube for a lack of communication and said they have been “left in the dark” while they miss out on other training and employment opportunities.

During the Covid-19 pandemic the Road Haulage Association (RHA) estimated a shortfall of 100,000 lorry drivers, caused by lockdowns, a boom in online shopping and a post-Brexit exodus of EU drivers. It prompted haulage firms to offer generous wages of up to £60,000 and four-figure sign-on bonuses.

By September 2021, the DfE had established HGV skills bootcamps to quickly train truckers and get them on the road. The programme, backed with tens of millions of pounds, is supposed to be a 12-to-16-week course with a guaranteed job interview at the end.

Qube Learning, recently rated as ‘requires improvement’ by Ofsted, was one of 24 providers approved by DfE to deliver the “new to HGV driving” bootcamp. It was one of only a handful that was approved to offer bootcamps in multiple locations in every region of England.

Tom O’Sullivan signed up to Qube’s HGV bootcamp last year after leaving a senior role in the NHS due to burn out. He viewed HGV driving as a good career for job security where he could also help an industry struggling with skill shortages.

He was accepted onto the course in February 2022 and month later took part in four webinars. He was then told to go for a medical so that he could apply for a provisional licence and sit theory tests, which he passed in July.

There was radio silence from Qube until December when he received an email to say the provider was preparing to start his training in the new year. He was shocked to receive a message this week telling him there was no way forward.

“It’s super frustrating”, O’Sullivan told FE Week. “I’ve made decisions to not pursue other opportunities because I was doing this. I could have been a year into paid employment by now.”

Liam Millington is another HGV bootcamp learner with Qube who has gone through a similar experience.

“It’s gutting, I’ve been looking forward to obtaining my licence for the past year. I haven’t told my family or friends yet as they were just as excited for me.”

Capperauld said Qube’s delivery model was different to many other HGV bootcamp providers because it outsources the practical training and testing elements to external suppliers.

She told FE Week: “Unforeseen increases in delivery costs since the contracts were issued in March 2022 including increased fuel, energy and staff costs meant that our model was no longer viable.

“We have been in discussions with the DfE since October 2022 regarding these challenges and were surprised that the contract was terminated after they had specifically instructed us to contact learners with regards to finishing their training.”

Qube isn’t the first training provider to raise the alarm about the higher-than-expected cost of delivery for HGV bootcamps. Systems Group Ltd went bust in November blaming inadequate funding levels. Around 2,000 learners, mostly on bootcamps, were impacted.

Capperauld said Qube has “made it clear to the DfE that we will support with learner transition as required”.

The DfE said it is “providing the opportunity for learners to enrol with another training provider so that they can complete their training”.

But an email to affected learners, seen by FE Week, asks that “you do not contact the department and wait for further guidance and instruction – we will email you by Friday 14th April with more information”.

The email added: “If you are contacted by any company regarding delivery of skills bootcamps in HGV driving, practical tests, licensing or similar, please do not take any action. The DfE is not able to reimburse any costs where a learner has elected to self-fund their training.”