Jenkyns: Results problems ‘slightly tarnished’ T Level brand

The newly reappointed minister for skills has set out some of her priorities at the Conservative Party Conference.

The newly reappointed minister for skills has set out some of her priorities at the Conservative Party Conference.

A “serious incident” that left T Level health and science students with lower-than-expected results did “slightly tarnish” the T Level brand, the newly reappointed minister for skills has said.

Addressing the blunder, which led to an Ofqual and Department for Education investigation, Andrea Jenkyns said “it was very unfortunate, we were all disappointed”. 

“We’ve got an investigation into that at the moment and I’m going to be releasing that this year. 

“I think it’s a shame that that happened. It has sort of tarnished slightly some of the PR and the positivity of T Levels,” Jenkyns said.

The minister followed up her comments with a staunch defence of T Levels and gave no indication of a change of policy on level 3 qualifications under prime minister Liz Truss’ administration. 

Back in May, the DfE published a draft list of 160 qualifications, including 38 BTECs, that it proposes to withdraw funding from in 2024 as they “overlap” with T Levels. The decision to defund BTECs in order to promote T Levels has been challenged by sector bodies, most notably by the Protect Student Choice campaign, led by the Sixth Form Colleges Association. 

Awarding organisations had until July 8 to appeal the DfE’s proposals. A final list of qualifications set to lose their funding is expected to be released imminently. 

Jenkyns said that despite having done a BTEC national in business and finance, she would herself now choose a T Level. 

“If I was choosing now I would do T Levels. It’s actually the industry placement. I know that there have been some issues with the placement and trying to get employers on board. But I think this is the right direction to be honest.”

The minister suggests that the industry placement element of T Levels will provide young people from working class families with the business and social networks that middle class families take for granted. 

Jenkyns was speaking on a panel organised by the Centre for Social Justice called ‘bridging the gap: high quality education for all’ alongside representatives from tutoring companies, the Fair Education Alliance and Robert Halfon, the chair of the education committee. 

Jenkyns left speaking alongside Susannah Hardyman founder of Action Tutoring Alice Wilcock head of education at Centre for Social Justice and Robert Halfon MP

This was the first education fringe event the new minister spoke at at the conference, and one of the first public events she has spoken at. 

“I’m very much a meritocrat; working-class background, first in my family to go to university in my late 30s and I was a BTEC girl,” she said by way of introduction. 

As well as rolling out T Levels and “driving up standards in apprenticeships”, Jenkyns said she wants to see “major improvements in literacy and numeracy across all ages”.

On higher education, Jenkyns said she disagrees with some university vice-chancellors’ calls for raising tuition fees. 

“Lots of universities have said to me that they want us to put up the amount that you can charge students. What I’m concerned about is the student. They’re going to be the ones who at the moment are saddled with 30 grand in debt. And so I don’t personally want to see that increased, especially when young people are starting out in life. I think we actually need to look at new ways of working it.”

Latest education roles from

Biology GCSE Tutor (Variable Hours)

Biology GCSE Tutor (Variable Hours)

Richmond and Hillcroft Adult & Community College

Work Experience Support Assistant

Work Experience Support Assistant

Bournemouth and Poole College

EHCP & SEND Administrator

EHCP & SEND Administrator

Bournemouth and Poole College

Director of Governance

Director of Governance

Stanmore College

Lecturer in Policing and Public Services

Lecturer in Policing and Public Services

West Suffolk College

Personal Progress Tutor

Personal Progress Tutor

West Suffolk College

Sponsored posts

Sponsored post

Active IQ: Shaping the Future of the Active Leisure Sector with 11 New Qualifications

In the ever-evolving landscape of Further Education (FE), particularly in sectors requiring highly skilled, certified professionals, certainty is crucial....

Advertorial
Sponsored post

The days of blaming funding rules for ALS claw-back are long gone

Industry experts discuss why providers must act now for the betterment of student success and stop hiding behind the...

Advertorial
Sponsored post

Are we running out of STEAM?

In the 21st century, the education landscape has been dominated by the prioritisation of STEM subjects. Science, Technology, Engineering...

Advertorial
Sponsored post

The college roadmap to AI maturity – and a reskilled workforce

AI is poised to drive economic growth, reshape jobs, and transform industries, demanding urgent upskilling. Education must swiftly adapt,...

Code Institute

More from this theme

Politics, Skills reform

Youth guarantee: A ‘real chance’ or lacking ‘firepower’?

Get Britain Working white paper draws mixed reaction

Josh Mellor
Colleges, Politics

College teacher pay snub goes legal

SFCA launches judicial review against DfE

Billy Camden
Politics

Laura Trott appointed shadow education secretary

MP for Sevenoaks and former chief secretary to the Treasury tapped by Kemi Badenoch to lead Conservative education team

Freddie Whittaker
Politics

Revealed: The new education committee membership

11 MPs selected for influential committee that holds the Department for Education to account

Samantha Booth

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

5 Comments

  1. Dan Jones

    “If I was choosing now I would do T Levels”, the operative word is choosing – the point is you won’t be able to choose. It’s not just BTECs it’s how they, and qualifications like them, combine and interlock which is the great enabler. Still let’s see what the fair, open and transparent ‘appeals’ process for applied generals brings. I look forward to the next DfE misstep and the inevitable judicial review which surely some representative bodies must be considering.

  2. Rob Green

    So the main issue is not the appalling impact on students but the PR and brand. Shows the arrogance of those around t levels who refuse to listen to the sector. Young people are the guinea pigs, but that doesn’t matter. Just as long as the civil servants and ministers can protect their ‘brand’. Are these people for real?

    • Unknown

      I think the case should be taken to court . And a public apology should be announced on media, pity your brand your reputation will be at risk soon try to make a joke out of that ! Like you did with those students and the book and the fact the course was on trial

  3. Anonymous

    no excuse for what’s happened the students need to be owe a public apology on media and compensation, how dare you even do something like this. Pity your brand your reputation will be at risk if there no apology given on media. You at least need to tell the students what the damn went wrong and why ! I suggest you prepare before the case reaches further ! You all deserve to be taken to court !