Revealed: Complex allocations for the ‘targeted level 3 adult offer’

level 3 adult offer

Just over £118 million has been set aside to pay for the new “targeted level 3 adult offer” across England – but the cash will come from two different education budgets.

From next month until the end of July 2022, “core funding” of £100 million will come from the new National Skills Fund (NSF) along with £16.25 million to pay for an “uplift” for learners aged 24 and over.

The remaining £2.5 million, to pay for an “uplift” for learners aged 19 to 23 will not come from the NSF but will instead be funded from the adult education budget (AEB).

The uplifts are £150 extra for short qualifications (less than an indicative 360 hours) and £600 for long qualifications (360 hours or more).

level 3 adult offer
Click to enlarge

The level 3 adult offer was first announced by prime minister Boris Johnson last October and forms part of the “lifetime skills guarantee”.

It will fully fund around 400 short and long qualifications at level 3, making them free to learners aged 19 and over who do not already have a first full level 3 qualification.

The Department for Education has so far refused to say how much funding has been allocated for providers to deliver the new offer.

But the total NSF and AEB budgets for the level 3 adult offer were revealed in a letter sent by the Education and Skills Funding Agency to the Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan.

The letter, dated February 3 and marked “official sensitive”, has been published on the Greater London Authority website.

It explains how the complex budgeting arrangements filter through to an even more complex set of funding allocations for providers in both non-devolved and devolved areas.

The funding will be routed through the AEB funding formula and rates, but all the NSF funding is “ringfenced” and will be clawed back if not spent on the “level 3 adult offer”.

For learners aged 24 and over, their level 3 adult offer core funding and uplift would be funded from the NSF in this way.

But the letter reveals for the first time that it is much more complicated for those aged 19 to 23.

If a 19-to-23-year-old chooses a qualification “that is included in both the level 3 adult offer and the 19-to-23 level 3 legal entitlement” then both the course and uplift funding is not ringfenced and comes from the AEB budget and not from the ringfenced NSF.

In this example, just the £150 and £600 uplifts would be funded from the £2.5 million set aside for this purpose.

level 3 adult offer
Sadiq Khan

But, if a 19-to-23-year-old chooses a qualification “on the level 3 adult offer list that is not included in the 19-to-23 level 3 entitlement, then the funding for the course and the uplift will come from the ringfenced NSF funding”.


‘The department is allocating this amount at its own risk’

The letter also says £23.75 million of the £118 million relates to April and July 2022 which “falls outside the current spending review period and the department is allocating this amount at its own risk.”

These highly unusual and complex budgeting arrangements are expected to be “transitional”, coming after publication of the FE white paper – but before a consultation on the new NSF.

Last week, on an FE Week webcast, Keith Smith, the DfE director of post-16 strategy responsible for the FE white paper, said the NSF consultation would be published in the spring.

The FE white paper promises “simplification and streamlining of funding” but Smith conceded that introducing programmes with brand-new funding rules and methodologies do add further complexity to an already complicated system.

As reported in FE Week he also said: “Please don’t take anything that happens in the short term as any sort of indication of where the future intent will be.”

More from this theme

Apprenticeships, Colleges, Skills reform

Front bench rivals clash in Colleges Week debate

Schools minister and shadow skills minister engage in back-and-forth on future of apprenticeship levy

Josh Mellor
Skills reform

‘Elite’ Star and Eton sixth forms reveal ‘clearing house’ careers role

Partnership between academy trust and top private school also opens new 'think and do' tank

FE Week Reporter
Apprenticeships, Politics, Skills reform

Halfon quizzed on levy funding gap, FSQ woes and 5% co-investment future

Skills minister also pressed on apprenticeship spending restriction discussions and EPA market

Billy Camden
Skills reform

Destinations unknown: ILR data cut angers MCAs

Destination and progression submission requirement to end in 2024/25

Billy Camden
Colleges, English and maths, Skills reform

DfE to introduce English and maths resit minimum hours and scrap 5% tolerance

'Wholly unhelpful' changes to condition of funding rules amid concerns over rising non-compliance

Billy Camden
Colleges, Reclassification, Skills reform

DfE promises to ‘streamline’ high-end principal salary sign-offs

Lengthy delays are impacting college boss recruitment

Anviksha Patel

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


  1. It’s not unusual for funding to come from different pots.

    Take 24+ loans, and the different sources for ALS, area uplift & disadvantage uplift. (plus differences within that based on age)

    Perhaps this article is really about point scoring on ‘simplification’…

  2. We constantly read about central Government, the DfE, ESFA and the devolved MCA’s striving to simplify the funding rules and remove bureaucracy, making it more straightforward for learners and providers alike…. But in reality all we’re seeing is more complexity, more red tape, and more convoluted and confusing rules and processes.
    It’s hard enough for industry experts so you have to feel for the poor end users trying to navigate the minefield of funded learning. Shambles.