FE white paper: Employer casts doubt on chambers of commerce leading role

fe white paper

Chambers of commerce are “not close enough to industry” to play a leading role in the skills system as set out in the FE white paper, an employer has warned.

Flannery Plant Hire director Paul Allman made the remarks at an FE Week webcast (watch below) on the Skills for Jobs white paper, which announced the creation of new “local skills improvement plans” when it was published in January.

These plans, which will force colleges and providers to align the courses they offer to local employers’ needs, are set to be piloted in a number of currently unknown trailblazer areas this year, with chambers and other business representative organisations leading the work.

The government is even intending to legislate to put employer leadership of the plans “on statutory footing”.

I don’t think they’re close enough to what industry needs

But FE Week understands chambers are still in the dark about what their exact role will be under the reforms, despite the government promising to announce the pilot areas in “early 2021”.

And Allman, whose company has helped develop apprenticeships as part of a trailblazer group, expressed his doubts about how effective the chambers would be in leading employer engagement.

“I don’t really see the chambers as being a good route to solving these problems,” he said. “I don’t think they’re close enough to what industry needs, particularly not in the construction sector. They don’t fit into the space, to be honest.”

Chambers ‘expected to play their part’

Education secretary Gavin Williamson’s foreword in the white paper said that local business organisations, chambers of commerce specifically, will “place employers at the heart of defining local skills needs”.

It is part of Williamson’s attempts to model England’s technical education system on that of Germany, where chambers provide a “one-stop shop” to register apprentices, supervise training, assess trainers and conduct examinations, the white paper says.

Membership of the chambers is compulsory for German employers, but this is not the case in England and there are no plans to change this.

There are 43 chambers across England which comprise groups of local businesses, with varying levels of staff. They typically offer their members opportunities for networking as well as advice on legal matters, health and safety and tax.

In response to Allman’s remarks, Jane Gratton, head of people policy for the British Chambers of Commerce, said the place-based, business-led chambers have the ability “to convene employers of all sizes and sectors, together with a wide range of skills providers and economic stakeholders, to discuss and agree local priorities”.

Gratton said they “look forward” to further announcements from the Department for Education about how the Local Skills Improvement Plans policy will be “brought to life” but are yet to have those conversations with ministers.

“We expect chambers across England will step forward to play their part in ensuring more people can train and retrain for new and emerging jobs in their local communities.”

Key organisations need to ‘focus’

Allman also warned that there is “a lot of apathy” from employers about getting involved in the skills sector that could dampen the government’s ambitions.

He said there should be “a drive within our sector to get the key organisations together and really focus on how we can work closely with the FE colleges to actually develop something that is fit for the purpose of what we need”.

Responding to the concerns, a Department for Education spokesperson said: “We want a wide range of businesses of all sizes and from all sectors to feed into local skills improvement plans so that technical education and training meets their needs.

“We therefore expect the business representative organisation leading the development of a local skills improvement plan in a trailblazer area to engage effectively with other relevant business representative organisations and sector bodies in the local area as part of their engagement with key local stakeholders.”

The DfE added that it will be running an open process to select the trailblazer local areas and that further information will be announced in the “near future”.


More from this theme

Bootcamps, Ofsted, Skills reform

US ed tech giant exits bootcamps after raking in £5m

Struggling firm leaves UK training 'in the best interest of students'

Billy Camden
Colleges, Skills reform

MPs: DfE should include FE in teacher recruitment forecasts

FE is the 'worst impacted' sector yet often ignored by DfE plans

Josh Mellor
AEB, Politics, Skills reform

DfE scales back ‘free courses for jobs’ offer 

Access will be restricted to adults earning below £25k in 2024/25

Billy Camden
Politics, Skills reform

‘Change on an unprecedented scale’: Ofqual responds to ABS plans

Qualifications reform risks more exams, 'unregulated' A-levels and students unprepared for higher study, says exams regulator

Freddie Whittaker
Colleges, ITPs, Skills reform, Universities

Publish performance data for university franchise providers, MPs tell OfS

Public Accounts Committee warns of system abuse and oversight flaws

Josh Mellor
Colleges, ITPs, Politics, Skills reform

‘Grossly unfair’: DfE excludes ITP teachers from £6k bonus scheme

Ministers have extended 'levelling up premium' payments to FE, but only for colleges

Billy Camden

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


  1. From what I read in this article, Pauk Allman doesn’t seem to have any knowledge or idea of the role Chambers play in not only how they support and represent local businesses and communities at a local, regional and national level, but the connection and relationships they have with large and smaller employers across all sectors. For once Government is bringing the right people to the table to tackle this age-old conundrum of what skills is required locally.

  2. He also said that the most important thing for the construction industry was new employees that were safe to be on site, which is something that is not happening at the moment.

    However, FEWeek does rather pick and choose where it likes to point the finger. Pretty sure this won’t get published.

  3. Mike Farmer

    Your articles states that there are 53 chambers across England. I think you will find that these 53 chambers are actually those that are accredited by the British Chambers of Commerce. A glance at the map on the BCC website suggests that accredited chambers are pretty thin on the ground where I live in the South West. There also appear to be an unknown number of non-accredited chambers. My local chamber in Cheltenham, for example, is not accredited, and, when I spoke to them told me they have no plans to seek accreditation. There is a It seems to me that this patchy coverage must add further doubts about the capacity of the chambers to fulful the role ascribed them in the White Paper.