A charity providing online skills bootcamps for adults facing barriers to employment has been judged ‘outstanding’ by Ofsted.
Generation You Employed, a global charity set up in the UK in 2019, was given top marks after inspectors heard of the “transformational effect” that studying there has on many learners’ lives.
At the time of its first-ever full inspection in August, the charity had 35 learners studying the retrofit advisor skills bootcamp, 39 studying data engineering and 26 studying IT support. All training is delivered online.
In Generation’s report published this morning, the watchdog found most learners successfully complete their programmes and gain a job interview.
“Learners have an excellent understanding of how their skills bootcamp programme can lead to paid, sustainable employment,” inspectors said.
Ofsted’s inspection remit was expanded to skills bootcamps in April 2023 after a thematic review found inconsistent quality of training and poor government oversight. The programme is worth over half a billion pounds between 2020 and 2025.
The training courses can last up to four months and are supposed to end with a guaranteed interview with an employer.
Michael Houlihan, CEO of Generation, said the charity was involved in the pilot skills bootcamps before the government rolled out the initiative and will continue to develop new programmes after the glowing report.
“We seek to identify, enrol, and then support people who face barriers to employment, supporting them into jobs, whilst doing so with very high success rates. Doing so is complex but creates very real and meaningful impact for the people we support,” he told FE Week.
“The reality of supporting people who are often in complicated situations and are facing a range of barriers, it is not a one size fits all approach.
“This is all comes down to a huge testament and acknowledgement of the team’s effort to apply with huge amounts of expertise, diligence and care, supporting those learners in a way which realises fantastic outcomes for them.”
High outcomes
Ofsted’s report said that Generation’s learners arrive for online lessons promptly, dressed appropriately and “eager to learn” and teachers use online chat facilities “skilfully” to check learners’ understanding.
Inspectors found students grow confidence “rapidly” and staff review challenging goals regularly.
“They also help learners to acquire the conviction, drive and resilience to overcome the barriers that have often previously held them back,” the report said.
Ofsted praised leaders for “carefully” designing programmes with employers and partner organisations and including “highly valued” qualifications that nearly all learners pass.
In the retrofit advisor course, for example, learners take an industry qualification as part of the bootcamp.
“This contributes to most learners securing high-quality, sustainable jobs,” the report said.
Staff were commended for being industry experts and ordering the curriculum carefully and checking what learners knew before starting the programme.
Inspectors said: “For example, data engineering learners initially develop their analytical thinking using programming languages, such as Python. They then use these skills to resolve simulated business issues as part of a team. This helps learners quickly master new skills and knowledge.”
In the governance section, Ofsted said the board of trustees used their insight to support and challenge leaders “very effectively”.
Inspectors said: “They ask questions and review data to assure themselves that Generation continues to focus on those learners who face the greatest challenges. In this way, they ensure that Generation continues to achieve its vision and makes a positive impact on learners and wider society.”
Houlihan told FE Week that the charity is due to launch a solar panel installer program in response to the “pace of change in industry” particularly in the sectors it’s involved in: technology, green skills, and health and care.
Jamie Purser (pictured) will take over as Newham College’s top boss on January 1, 2025 as Paul Stephen retires at the end of December after seven years at the helm.
By this time the college expects to have taken on the troubled Newham Sixth Form College (NewVIc), which has been without a permanent leader since last October.
Purser has been deputy principal at Newham College for the past four years. He has also been acting principal at NewVIc since June 3.
Merger date set
Today’s announcement revealed the two colleges plan to merge on November 1, 2024, adding NewVIc’s 2,400 learners to Newham College’s 10,000-plus student roster.
The merger comes after NewVIc became the only sixth form college in the country to hold education watchdog Ofsted’s lowest possible judgment and was put into formal intervention by the government earlier this year.
The last time NewVIc had a permanent principal was last October, until former boss Mandeep Gill went on sick leave. Susanne Davies ran the college as interim principal when Ofsted inspectors posted a scathing report in April.
Ofsted pointed out how “staffing issues, ineffective teaching and administrative errors” were causing significant disruption to learners’ education.
Staff had previously told FE Week they planned to strike for 30 days in 2023 during the busy exam period amid a toxic battle with leaders over staff cuts and high workloads.
The college’s chair, Martin Rosner, also stepped down in March this year.
After the Ofsted report, NewVIc told FE Week it was exploring a merger with neighbouring Newham College, rated ‘good’ by Ofsted, as it has “demonstrable strengths in the areas Ofsted identified as areas for development at NewVIc”.
Jamie Purser said: “I am pleased and very proud to be appointed as the next principal and CEO of Newham College. It’s a privilege to lead an institution that has such a transformative educational impact.
“I look forward to embracing new opportunities, continuing the college’s traditions of excellence, aspiration and inclusion, and remaining at the heart of the communities we serve, supporting them to thrive and succeed.”
Newham College chair Paul Jackson said: “Under Paul Stephen’s leadership, the college has not only achieved great success for our students but also created opportunities for staff progression. Jamie exemplifies this journey, and his unanimous appointment reflects his reflects his outstanding leadership and contribution to our continued growth.”
Stephen said: “Having worked closely with Jamie, I have seen firsthand his capabilities as a leader. He has the vision, skills, experience and to accelerate the college’s positive trajectory and I fully support the governing body’s decision to appoint Jamie on his own merits.”
A spokesperson for Newham College said that with a combined turnover of £55 million and a student population of over 10,000, the merged institution will be the largest educational provider in Newham.
A “bigger, more comprehensive college will offer even greater opportunities for local students”, the spokesperson added.
Poor pay in further education is causing shortages in teachers training the next generation of workers in some of England’s most high-demand sectors, researchers have warned.
A new report by the National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER) explores how college teacher roles in construction, engineering, and digital are seeing huge vacancy levels.
It points out that college teachers can earn much higher salaries in industry, and that they are paid nearly a quarter less than teachers in schools.
NFER economist and report co-author Dawson McLean criticised how despite FE playing a “key role” in the supply of skilled workers to industry, there has been a “historical lack of policy focus” on the sector’s teacher pay levels.
He said: “Worsening pay gaps with industry and school teachers, together with high workload, puts the FE workforce at a significant disadvantage for recruitment and retention.”
During the election, Labour pledged to cut overseas recruitment and immigration in priority occupations such as engineers by targeting training at sectors which are facing staff shortages.
However, this plan to invest in technical training appears not to apply to the FE workforce, as the newly elected Labour government decided to hand schools a £1.2 billion pot to help cover a 5.5 per cent salary boost for teachers, but not colleges.
A Department for Education (DfE) spokesperson later told FE Week that this is due to the “very challenging fiscal context” and partly because FE does not have a pay review body in the same way as schools.
Increase pay to match school teachers
NFER’s report, funded by the Gatsby Charitable Foundation, is based on interviews with 61 teachers and heads of department.
It also used FE workforce data on the 2021/22 academic year, published for the first time last summer, to estimate that FE teachers earn 23 per cent less than those in other parts of the education sector.
FE teachers of engineering and digital subjects were about 11 per cent lower than average earnings in their industry occupations, while construction earnings were about 3 per cent less (although this is likely to be an underestimation as researchers were unable to consider self-employment earnings).
Researchers found that in 2021/22, the average general FE college had 17, 14 and 10 unfilled vacancies per 100 teaching staff for construction, engineering and digital, respectively.
The average college had five unfilled vacancies per 100 staff for all other subjects, “suggesting that, while shortages of teaching staff are not unique to our three focus subjects, it appears to be considerably more of a challenge in these subjects than in many others”, according to the report.
It also said that financial responsibilities of younger workers mean they are generally less able to take the pay cut to move from industry into FE, driving an ageing workforce and worsening retention due to higher retirement rates.
The research goes on to suggest some college strategies designed to close industry pay gaps can in the longer term exacerbate the problem. Recruiting new teachers at the top of the pay scale can lead to subsequent poor pay progression, and impact on morale and retention.
Nearly half of FE teachers leave the profession within three years nationally.
The report authors are calling for FE teachers’ pay to increase “at a minimum” to match school teachers’.
They also urge the government to help colleges compete with better paying industries by reducing workload and pressure on FE teachers, which it called a “crucial contributor to poor retention”.
A DfE spokesperson told FE Week: “We recognise the vital role that FE teachers and providers play in equipping learners with the skills they need to seize opportunity and to drive growth in our economy.
“We are investing around £600 million in FE teachers across this financial year and the next, including retention payments for eligible early career FE teachers in key subject areas, and funding to support English and maths GCSE resits.
“Decisions on funding for further education will be taken as part of the forthcoming spending review.”
‘Demoralising and unfair‘
The National Education Union (NEU) is balloting its 2,500 sixth form college teacher members to strike over the 5.5 per cent pay award, which only applies to sixth forms that have converted to academy status.
NEU general secretary Daniel Kebede said: “Now is the time for the new Labour government to make good on its manifesto pledge of a comprehensive strategy in FE, which would include the extension of binding collective bargaining on pay and working conditions to the sector.
“It is the responsibility of the government to provide the requisite funding to close the pay gap between schools and colleges, ensuring that a crucial sector for economic growth can supply the skills needs of the future.”
Sam Parrett, principal and CEO of London South East Colleges, said the FE pay gap is “both demoralising and unfair” for teachers.
She added: “We cannot expect to solve the UK’s skills gap or boost our economy without addressing this issue.
“The longer this pay inequality persists, the harder it will be to deliver the high-quality education and training our students, employers, and the economy desperately need.”
An analysis of the same workforce data by the Institute for Financial Studies, published last year, found that the median salary for a school teacher is now around £41,500 while for college teachers it is £34,500.
FE teachers also saw a higher fall in real earnings than school teachers since 2010.
UCU general secretary Jo Grady warned that Labour will fail to deliver its “promised decade of renewal” without investment that closes the “outrageous” pay gap between college and school teachers.
Association of Colleges chief executive David Hughes said: “Without skilled lecturers in colleges, skills shortages continue to grow, and the government will simply be unable to deliver on its manifesto commitments on new homes, net zero, a reformed NHS, productivity and economic growth.
“The government has an opportunity in the autumn budget to deliver a significant injection of funding into the sector. Introducing VAT relief for colleges, in the same way it does for schools and academies, would produce around £210 million a year.
“This could start to help to alleviate the severe recruitment and retention challenges.”
Previous Job: Freelance education and assessment consultant
Interesting fact: A lifelong football fan, Rebecca finally learned to play just 18 months ago after training sessions at her local club. She’s now hooked and playing five-a-side is a weekly highlight for her.
Sam Callear
Chief Operating Officer, GTA England
Start date: September 2024
Previous Job: Deputy Director: Policy and New Concepts, Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education
Interesting fact: Through diligent research, Sam managed to bag Oasis tickets in under an hour after going on sale.
Daniel Green
Policy Director, Federation of Awarding Bodies
Start date: September 2024
Previous Job: Senior Policy Manager, Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education
Interesting fact: Dan’s first job was at a community sports association in New Zealand, however it quickly became apparent that his ability in rugby trailed far behind the locals. A football programme was established in its place.
In our new report, Edge set out our concerns that, unless the growth and skills levy is carefully designed, greater flexibilities for businesses could squeeze funding for apprenticeship opportunities. As a result, the worrying decline of young people participating in apprenticeships, especially at entry levels, will continue.
There are always winners and losers when it comes to levy reform. However, there are currently no guardrails or pledges of additional money to ensure that the growth and skills levy will be invested in apprenticeships or young people.
Granted, the government has promised traineeships will be in scope. But without strong incentives, the apprenticeships that should follow might simply not be there.
Levy-paying employers are far less likely to hire young apprentices compared to SMEs. Since the apprenticeship levy’s introduction, the number of under-19s starting an apprenticeship has dropped by 37 per cent.
Looking at these trends over the past few years, it’s hard to comprehend how giving them more flexibility to spend this money on other skills training (in tandem, squeezing the pot available for SMEs) could result in more opportunities for young people.
Our report identifies that the growth and skills levy could also risk compromising achievement of other government policies and missions. The opportunity mission, aiming to break “the pernicious link between background and success”, hinges partly on delivering a ‘youth guarantee’. This promises every 18-to-21-year-old that they will have access to training, support to find work or, critically, an apprenticeship.
This is a hugely welcome pledge, given the number of young people not in education, employment and training has risen to 872,000.
Apprenticeships are the unrealised heart of the government’s growth mission. Bridget Phillipson said it best in a recent op-ed about the construction sector being the manpower that will deliver Labour’s promise to build 370,000 more homes/year: “to get Britain moving again, we also need skilled technicians […] But too few young people are pursuing these careers and it’s holding Britain back.”
All of these missions are potentially in jeopardy
Growth also means investing in our domestic workforce. Home secretary Yvette Cooper has singled out IT and engineering as her first areas of focus. As we highlight in our report, these two industries are crying out for more young apprentices.
An NHS Fit for the Future? Not without apprentices! A representative from NHS England warned us that allowing apprenticeship numbers to drop will seriously impact their ability to deliver the health service long-term workforce plan.
Make Britain a clean energy superpower? Sounds like we’ll need a few low-carbon heating technicians for that.
All of these missions are potentially in jeopardy unless the levy is carefully designed to protect apprenticeship opportunities for young people. As well as presenting the options at its disposal, in our report, we urge the government to use the many levers at its disposal to make a substantial difference to employers’ ability to use their levy to create more, lower-level opportunities for young people before jumping to – or at least, in conjunction with – flex of the levy.
This could include building on best-practice examples here and internationally to broker apprenticeships and support employers to understand their skills needs.
It might involve reforming the EPA and functional skills qualifications that are holding back apprenticeship completions.
And it should comprise streamlining the application and advertising of apprenticeships towards a meaningful one-stop shop, in the same way we have for university admissions. It’s not an easy fix, but a crucial one if we want to get serious about opportunity.
We also present a series of options available to the government and Skills England in considering the proportions of the levy that can be spent on non-apprenticeship skills training, the types of training courses that should be eligible for funding and who should benefit.
As Labour prepare for conference, they are right to focus on what businesses want. After all, they are the backbone of our economy. However, it is crucial to remember that they also depend on a skilled pipeline of new talent.
We will inevitably need to make short-term sacrifices to achieve long-term gain, but we now need the government to show courage in its own vision for change.
Read the full report, Flex Without Compromise: Preserving Apprenticeships for Young People Under a Growth and Skills Levy, here
Failing to impose strict controls on what training the incoming growth and skills levy can pay for would turn it into a “complete racket” for employers, a Labour peer has warned.
A report on the new government’s proposed reformed apprenticeship levy, released by the Edge Foundation today, looks at what “levers are left to pull” that would target the policy to benefit young people.
It warns that too much non-apprenticeship training could erode “already dwindling” apprenticeship opportunities especially at lower levels for those aged under 25.
But first, Labour urgently needs to “clearly articulate” what it hopes to achieve with levy reform to avoid damaging the apprenticeship “brand” – a task that has been handed to new quango Skills England.
Here are some key options the Edge Foundation suggests the government consider.
Limit the scope of non-apprenticeship spending
The charity has called on Skills England to put “tight guardrails” on what types of non-apprenticeship training levy funds can be spent on.
To ensure the training is “high quality”, the skills body should set “specified standards of quality, learner experience and outcomes”.
Labour peer and leading economist Lord Richard Layard, who wrote the foreword for the report and had his views featured throughout, tells the Edge Foundation adding too much flex would be a “complete racket”.
He adds: “What businesses want is to be able to use the apprenticeship levy to pay for things which they currently pay for themselves. It’s an absolute outrage.”
Prioritise ‘pre-apprenticeship’ style spending
Limiting levy flexibilities to pre-apprenticeship training would both promote apprenticeships to young people while conserving funding, the charity said.
Ahead of the general election, Labour pledged to set aside 3 per cent of the skills and growth levy for 150,000 traineeships.
But Edge Foundation urges the government to “learn lessons” from previous the previous traineeship scheme, scrapped by the government due to low take up.
Ringfence for certain groups
The government could add ringfences for certain groups, such as the young, or lower-level apprentices, to halt the trend of employers spending their levy on “more expensive, higher-level apprenticeships and/or on existing, older employees”.
But while this could be a “powerful driver” of employer behaviour, the charity acknowledges warnings from former skills Sir Michael Barber, who has argued that higher-level degree apprenticeships are good for social mobility and “integral” in improving apprenticeships’ prestige.
Flex %s with caution
Labour plans originally suggested employers would be able to spend up to 50 per cent of their levy allocation on non-apprenticeship training, but this threshold was notably absent in their 2024 general election manifesto.
The more recent language of “up to 50 per cent” suggests Labour has “listened to the uneasiness about such an arbitrary division”, Edge’s report said.
It states that most interviewees who participated in their research preferred a majority share for apprenticeships, with Policy Exchange, for example, suggesting ringfencing 75 per cent of the levy for apprenticeships.
Alternatively, employers could be required to “earn” their flexible allowance by first spending a set proportion, for example 50 per cent, of their levy fund on apprenticeships, the report added.
It said: “Proceeding with caution when it comes to setting the proportions of the growth and skills levy seems like a sensible approach – how much employers can spend on non-apprenticeship skills training can always be increased, but it is harder to remove flexibilities from the system.”
‘Treasury Margin’
One way to fund non-apprenticeship skills training without reducing the number of apprenticeships available could be to tap into the estimated £835 million ‘Treasury Margin’.
This is the gap between how much the levy generates in employer receipts verses how much the Treasury hands to the Department for Education and the devolved nations as their apprenticeship budget.
However, this option is “unlikely to be popular” at the Treasury, due to what the Edge Foundation calls a “lack of transparency and accountability”.
Extend levy to more businesses
Another way to raise money could be to extend the levy to all UK businesses, raising as much as £1.6 billion per year.
Currently, only businesses with an annual payroll of over £3 million pay 0.5 per cent of their payroll bill into the levy.
Increase small business apprenticeships
Key to more young people and lower-level apprenticeships is reversing the decline of starts in small businesses since 2017, the report argues.
To do this, the government should roll out financial incentives, building on other welcome recent steps such as removing the cap for small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and fully funding their training.
Address functional skills
The government should urgently look at the “suitability” of functional skills requirements, which many view as a “barrier to completion”.
Gill Mason, training academy director at Kids Planet, a learning provider and employer in early years, told the Edge Foundation: “It isn’t functional. It’s GCSE. It’s just what they’ve just left and come away from.
“It absolutely is the main reason our staff leave and don’t achieve is maths and English.”
Improve wages
Put apprenticeships on an “even keel” with other routes such as entry-level jobs and undergraduate degrees that have student loan support, the edge argues.
This would address surveys which have found that one-quarter of apprenticeship applicants didn’t pursue the careers route due to “affordability” concerns.
The Department for Education and Treasury have been approached for comment.
Team UK has scooped two silver and two bronze medals at this year’s WorldSkills competition in Lyon, France.
After four days of gruelling competition, Team UK were awarded four podium position medals at an electric ceremony this evening.
The UK also bagged 14 medallions of excellence across 12 skills.
Earlier this evening, family, friends, experts and officials descended on the OL Arena on the outskirts of Lyon to watch the 1,500 young people discover who came out on top as the world’s best in 62 skills competitions.
Solihull College alumni Harry Scolding won silver in joinery. He was tasked with building a working door over the course of four days.
Harry Scolding, joinery
He said: “I still haven’t come round to the fact that this has just happened.”
Scolding currently runs his own business HDS Joinery and said his customers had been “very supportive” with his training schedule in the last 6 weeks.
Scolding’s parents Katie and Lee, who own and run a hairdressing business, told FE Week earlier in the week that it is an “honour” being the parents of a WorldSkills UK champion.
“I’m not surprised that my son has got himself there, because he’s got a lot of determination and drive, and we’re just hoping he’s going to do really well in his competition,” Lee Scolding said.
Ruben Duggan, silver medallist, with training manager Ronnie Ferris
Ruben Duggan also won silver in the plumbing and heating. Duggan achieved the same feat in last year’s EuroSkills in Gdansk, Poland.
“When I came out of the bay, I was feeling a bit deflated. I didn’t think I’d put the best I’ve ever put into it, but I can’t think about it now. It’s absolutely brilliant.”
Duggan works for Powerserv LTD and trains at Coleg Y Cymoedd, Wales.
In the refrigeration and air conditioning skill, bronze was awarded Eastleigh College’s Luke Haile.
Haile, who works for Lightfoot Defence in Fareham, Hampshire, told FE Week that he has got “so much more” out of competing in and training for two and a half years for WorldSkills.
“I’d like to keep going onwards and upwards. It’s what WorldSkills has taught me is to keep pushing and see how far you go.”
David McKeown also won bronze for his skill in autobody repair. McKeown works at his family business James McKeown Accident Repair and trains at Riverpark Training in Northern Ireland.
McKeown told FE Week that his win felt “very surreal”.
“I went in with a really good head at the start of the competition,” he said. “The first two days were really good, the third day was hard.
“I realised how tight my competition was. China and Japan really made my job hard but fair play to them.”
The closing ceremony also presented the ‘Best in Nation’ award to Ruby Pile, Team UK’s restaurant service competitor.
Pile works at Lucknam Park Hotel and Spa and attended Cardiff and Vale College.
Medallions for excellence in 12 skills were also awarded for achieving the international standard benchmark.
Ben Blackledge, WorldSkills UK chief executive, said: “This is a fantastic result for the team and the UK as a whole. High quality skills development is crucial to growing the economy, and Team UK’s medal-winning performance in front of a global audience sends a strong message that the UK is a world-class place to invest, develop talent and create jobs.”
See the full table of winners here:
WorldSkills 2024 UK results
Medal
Skill
Name
Training provider
Silver
Joinery
Harry Scolding
Solihull College and University Centre
Silver
Plumbing and heating
Ruben Duggan
Coleg Y Cymoedd
Bronze
Refrigeration and air conditioning
Luke Haile
Eastleigh College
Bronze
Autobody repair
David McKeown
Riverpark Training
Medallion for Excellence
Mechatronics
Lucy Yelland and Ben Love
Tameside College
Medallion for Excellence
Mechanical engineering CAD
Nathan Young
New College Lanarkshire
Medallion for Excellence
Web technologies
Mark Kiss
United Colleges Group
Medallion for Excellence
Electrical installation
Daniel Knox
South West College
Medallion for Excellence
Painting and decorating
Dior Regan
Lincoln College
Medallion for Excellence
Cabinet making
Isaac Bingham
Southern Regional College
Medallion for Excellence
Hairdressing
Charlotte Lloyd
Reds Hair Company
Medallion for Excellence
Cooking
Oska Ready
DN Colleges Group
Medallion for Excellence
Car painting
Miguel Harvey
Steer Automotive Group
Medallion for Excellence
IT network systems administration
Finley Graham
City of Glasgow College / Glasgow Caledonian University
Medallion for Excellence
Digital construction
Isabelle Barron
Sheffield Hallam University
Medallion for Excellence
Robot systems integration
Jason Scott & Charlie Carson
Northern Regional College & Northern Regional College / University of Ulster
After four days of intensive competitions, all eyes are now on Sunday evening’s WorldSkills 2024 closing ceremony.
Among thousands of international visitors and spectators, this year’s troupe of 1,400 competitors from 69 competing countries and regions will finally find out if they’ve done enough to place themselves and their countries on the medal table.
Proceedings will begin 6.30pm, streamed live below, with a brief programme of remarks from WorldSkills dignitaries.
Then, skill by skill, the highest-scoring competitors will be announced as gold, silver and bronze medallists.
One top competitor will be named the recipient of the prestigious Albert Vidal Award, which goes to the champion who received the highest score of the entire competition. The UK last won the Albert Vidal Award in 2015.
We also expect a spectacular performance from WorldSkills Shanghai, marking the official handover from Lyon for WorldSkills 2026.
Richard Alberg is flying high, and not just because his company, Aptem, is catapulting apprenticeships into the AI age via its software. He’s flying in a literal sense with his commute to work, piloting his small plane from his Channel Islands home – where he can “wake up and see the sea” – to board meetings in London.
Alberg says he has always sought to capitalise on the latest technological advances in his entrepreneurial endeavours. He co-founded Corndel in 2017 as a means of providing Aptem with its first training provider customer – not knowing it would become one of the highest-earning providers in the apprenticeships levy market.
Richard Alberg in the small plane that he flies
Jaw-dropping moment
He glimpsed a vision of the future shaped by AI two years ago during a demonstration of how ChatGPT could be used in Microsoft Office, which made Alberg realise what a game-changer generative AI could be for the apprenticeships market.
Until then, ChatGPT had been just a “party trick” for Alberg who would enjoy impressing friends by prompting it to create lyrics in Shakespearean style. But Microsoft’s demonstration revealed the potential for large language models to be embedded into third-party apps handling their own databases, opening the drawbridge for technology companies such as Aptem.
Alberg says he is “not someone who gets shocked that easily”. But his “jaw dropped to the ground” as he realised that “everything would change” with this development. The next day he set about reimagining his company.
Aptem’s commercial projects, which involved creating compliance solutions for training providers, were shelved as teams were redeployed onto new generative AI work.
Alberg suffered kickback from colleagues for the sudden direction change but remained convinced the technology would “profoundly change apprenticeship training”.
The economic argument for this is “compelling”, he says. Alberg believes many of his clients pay tutors around £50,000 a year but 20 per cent of tutor time “could be better utilised” by enabling a chatbot to answer generic questions from learners or help with marking assignments.
Alberg claims this saving could represent a 12 per cent extra margin for a provider with 100 tutors just by using AI moderately” for “mundane” tasks.
Meanwhile, tutors can focus on what they can do “far better than computers – pastoral care”.
Entrepreneurial spark
Alberg was determined to strike his own path in life from a young age. His Italian mother taught languages to opera singers as a professor at the Royal Academy of Music and Royal College of Music, but Alberg did not share her musical talents. The most creative he got with his guitar was “hitting my sister with it”, he tells me. He confesses to loving opera but “pretends not to” when talking to his mother.
Richard Alberg and his mum
Alberg’s lawyer father died when he was 12 after a four-year illness which resulted in him becoming “quite rebellious”.
He was already writing computer software to do his maths homework (to get “one up on the system”) and was moved up a school year to reflect his capabilities. But he then stubbornly chose not to go to university, a decision he came to regret when carving a career in the education and skills sector.
Alberg’s impressive self-confidence meant he bagged a graduate trainee job at an advertising agency where he came to love the buzz of the 1980s London advertising world. Although work days were long, so too were the lunches – and the parties.
At the tender age of 21 he set up his own agency, RDA Marketing Services, which clinched an “unglamorous” contract with Alan Sugar’s pioneering computer company Amstrad to expand its dealer marketing.
But Alberg admits he “wasn’t very good at working” with his two business partners, and sold out to them after getting “bored” and wanting something “new and different”.
‘Living on ether’
He found that opportunity after seeing a feature about computerised psychometric testing on BBC TV show Tomorrow’s World. He contacted the person behind the concept and set up a new company, Psychometric Services Ltd, with distribution rights for what became known as the ‘Eysenck Personality Profiler’ (EPP).
Richard Alberg early in his career
Alberg quickly realised it “wasn’t a great product”, but because his firm was merely the distributor he had “very little control” to improve it.
So he hired his own psychometricians and technologists and repositioned his company to develop its own psychometric profiling tools instead. It became one of the country’s biggest psychometric testing firms and sold its services to employers including UBS, Cadbury, BP and Royal Mail to use for recruitment and staff development.
But with success came “challenging” times too when the company was “living on ether”, as much of the income was tied up in the business. While everyone around him assured Alberg the company would “do brilliantly”, he was worried about meeting the next staff payroll.
Alberg had around 45 employees and could only grow his operation further by expanding internationally, which he was reluctant to do. Instead he sold up in 2006 to an American company, Kenexa, for “not so much money” – around £7 million – enough to pay off his mortgage. This brought “some security” to Alberg’s family, which he says “mattered a lot”.
With the 2008 financial crisis came job losses, which provided Alberg’s next opportunity – establishing an online job-seeking platform for the unemployed. His new company, My Work Search, did “exceptionally well commercially” while unemployment was “high and increasing”. It evolved to support the organisations providing assistance to the unemployed which opened Alberg’s eyes to the skills sector.
Whim of civil servants
In 2015 he became a governor at North Hertfordshire College, which gave Alberg an insight into how colleges operated.
Richard Alberg running his first marathon at the age of 42
He tells me that within a fortnight “some shenanigans emerged” involving significant misreporting. It led to the rest of the board being “encouraged to step down” amid “quite significant financial challenges”. Alberg was compelled to become the new chair, which was “so not the plan” for the busy entrepreneur.
Funding needed to be returned to the Education and Skills Funding Agency, and Alberg’s board “had to use every favour we could pull to try to have the ESFA allow us a certain amount of time before the money came back… you’re at the whim of a civil servant who can make life very difficult.”
The college’s 2017-18 accounts later revealed a £5 million deficit, 20 times higher than was budgeted for at the beginning of the year. It included a £4.3 million overspend compared to income and a £713,000 loss on the sale of a property.
Alberg blames some of the college’s woes on its decision to open a college in Saudi Arabia. North Herts was part of the College of Excellence programme, founded in 2013, to boost technical and vocational training in the kingdom through partnerships with international providers.
Alberg tells me the college’s contract with the Saudis was “so one-sided” and claims it “could have brought the college down”.
“Naive colleges go into sectors they’re ill equipped to be effective in and we could have gone bust on the back of our exposure to Saudi,” he says.
North Herts became one of many colleges to exit the Saudi market. FE Week analysis in June found that only seven colleges still had an overseas campus in 2022-23.
But despite all these challenges, Alberg “really got a kick” out of his two years as chair and says the experience he gleaned helped him in his own business endeavours.
“We were on the side of the angels who were doing good work.”
Becoming Aptem
As the economy bounced back and unemployment fell, Alberg again re-pivoted his company into Aptem, providing an end-to-end platform for the vocational training market. But there was a snag. Although providers expressed enthusiasm for the concept of a platform integrating learning management systems, e-portfolios, funding systems and CRM systems in one place, they were reluctant to be the first to pilot the endeavour.
Alberg’s solution was to set up a training company, Corndel (along with Sean Williams, a non-executive on his board) to act as Aptem’s first customer – just in time for the launch of the apprenticeships levy. Within three years Corndel had a revenue of £20 million and 250 staff.
Richard Alberg on his boat
Alberg puts its success down to having “no legacy”, enabling him to “design a company around what we felt the customer, the employer and the learner would find most valuable”.
Corndel decided to woo employers by spending “a fortune – hundreds of thousands” on curriculums, whereas their competitors would often rely on “the free stuff that an awarding body was willing to give them”.
They also paid “almost double” the going rate for tutors (£65,000 a year compared to £30,000 elsewhere), who they branded “professional development executives”.
They placed an “absolute focus on quality learner experience… treating the service as though it was an expensive, paid learning journey”. The fact it was paid for via the levy was “just incidental and a bonus”.
Alberg exited Corndel in 2020 when it was sold to investment group THI, but still regards it as his “baby, even if it feels fully grown up”. He remains “so proud of everything Corndel has achieved and is achieving”.
King Canute
Nowadays, Alberg works as a consultant for the education and training recruitment agency Protocol and behavioural finance firm Oxford Risk, having been a non-executive director for the firms prior to his move to Guernsey last year.
Aptem is now, he says, the largest technology vendor to the apprenticeships sector with 120 staff and 200 customers, the biggest being Lifetime Training. Alberg believes a “wonderful characteristic” of AI is that if Aptem makes an improvement next week, then every one of its 130,000 learners can benefit from it at the same time.
But he is also not blind to the downsides of the technology – how AI will erode the “entry-level skills” required for employees to become more accomplished at their work.
He draws parallels between the potential predicament of tech experts like himself and that of King Canute, who tried to show his courtiers he could not command the tides but whose message was misinterpreted by future generations. Like the tide, he sees AI technology as “inexorable”, and to think otherwise is “naïve”.
But in raising the potential downsides, “people in my position don’t want to get shot as a messenger. I have a commercial hat on… so you sometimes feel you have to sit on your hands a little bit”.
On the more positive side, Alberg says Aptem has “done a lot of testing” and found that ‘hallucinations’ (where chatbots create false information) have not yet emerged when data from the training sector is being interpreted by the chatbot.
Controversially, he believes that AI offers advantages over human support in terms of its reliability, because AI “doesn’t get bored of you” or “say, ‘I’ve got another call in five minutes, I’ve got to get off the line”.
He says: “Like Canute, I can’t change the tide. What I can do is say, ‘we’ll make this tool work as well as we can’.