College defends keeping A-level inquiry secret amid community backlash

The college boss at the centre of a community dispute about downgraded A-level results has defended keeping an internal review under wraps amid staff and MP outrage.

Students and parents picketed Havering Sixth Form College in August, claiming their teacher-assessed grades had been unfairly changed by leadership.

Following the protest, the college’s parent group, New City College, promised a “wholesale” review of whether grade boundaries were applied correctly.

This review concluded around a month ago, and while individual results have been communicated to students, the college has refused to reveal the overall outcome to staff and learners.

Labour MP for nearby Dagenham, Jon Cruddas, said he “finds it concerning” the overall results have not been shared because the situation requires “complete transparency”.

Hornchurch and Upminster MP Julia Lopez told FE Week her constituents had “recently” raised concerns with her about the matter.

a-level
Students protesting outside Havering Sixth Form in August

Havering’s local National Education Union branch, which said it represents two-thirds of the sixth-form’s staff, said teachers had been left to “speculate” on the results.

Speaking to FE Week, New City College’s group principal Gerry McDonald said the college did not want to reveal the results of the review as it would affect their “competitive position”.

For example, revealing “everything about how many entries we have” would become known to competing providers.

He also said he and Havering Sixth Form College principal Janet Smith held meetings with 120 teachers to answer questions on how the review had been run once it was over.

FE Week has submitted a freedom of information request for the overall findings and McDonald promised a response within the 20-day statutory deadline.

A-level results process explained

After this summer’s GCSE and A-level exams were cancelled in January, watchdog Ofqual instructed school and college teachers to set grades for students based on evidence showing the standard at which they were performing. Part of that evidence base included internal tests and mock assessments.

Managers within departments then confirmed these grades.

Ofqual’s guidance states the heads of centres, such as principals, were meant to confirm that students’ grades are a “true representation of their performance”. Exam boards then compared a centre’s 2021 grade submission with their performance in 2017, 2018 and 2019, according to the guidance.

This year’s exam candidates, if they were unhappy with their grade, were able to appeal in the first instance to their centre and if the centre discovered an error, they would inform the awarding body so it could produce a final grade.

‘Unbelievable’ teachers and students can only ‘speculate’ about review results

The Havering dispute arose following accusations the college leadership unfairly altered students’ A-level grades set by their teachers.

The NEU’s district secretary for Havering, John Delaney, said teachers had been “dismayed at the college’s lack of transparency” in how the results of the internal review were decided and how many appeals were successful.

He called it “unbelievable” that teachers and students could only “speculate to the actual results,” and said that this was a “professional as much as a public issue.

“The stakeholders have been bypassed: parents, teachers and the whole local community.”

The college, he added, “doesn’t seem to care”.

McDonald defended the college’s handling of the results, saying they had run “precisely the same process with A-levels as we did with GCSE English and maths”.

The college had entered 4,000 candidates for GCSEs and have only had 50 appeals, but would not reveal the figures for A-level appeals ahead of the college’s response to FE Week’s FOI request.

On appeals, McDonald said the college had seen a “bandwagon effect… For a particular student, there may have been no final moderation, no change in their original grade whatsoever.

“But they’re still appealing it because all their fellow classmates did,” and the “vast majority” of students had been able to get into their first- or second-choice university.

While his teachers had not “necessarily agreed with everything, they certainly don’t feel they’re not informed,” he said.

He also argued the college “had a duty” to “ensure there wasn’t too much inflation in the system” and it has now been recognised nationally there was “too much inflation” this year.

Ofqual and the Joint Council for Qualifications said they could not comment on whether they were investigating Havering’s A-level results.

BAME apprentice awards: back in person – and bigger than ever

The BAME Apprenticeships Awards returned in style last night as over 500 guests gathered in Birmingham in what’s believed to be the largest in-person sector event to take place post-pandemic.

The awards, delivered in partnership with Pearson, mark special achievements of black, Asian and minority ethnic apprentices and of employers of all sizes across ten economic sectors, including engineering, hospitality, logistics and health.

Special awards were also bestowed on a learning provider of the year, and a university of the year. All of this year’s winners are listed below.

Last year’s flagship ceremony had to take place online, but organisers ThinkFest used the return of in-person festivities to present both 2020 and 2021 winners with their awards.

VIP speakers stressed importance of BAME apprenticeships

Kasim Choudhry, managing director of the BAME Apprentice Network, said: “The team have worked really hard this year to make this event happen and we are so happy that people have finally been able to come together to celebrate apprenticeships.”

This year’s ceremony featured VIP speakers including West Midlands mayor Andy Street, who spoke about the important role of apprenticeships in the UK’s economic recovery.

Claire Rogers, acting senior vice president at Pearson, and Rachel Cooper, technical education strategy director at the Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education, also took to the stage. Both stressed the importance of celebrating diversity in apprenticeships and recognising outstanding leadership in employers.

Now in their sixth year, the BAME Apprenticeships Awards “showcase talent and diversity within BAME communities” and celebrate the “contribution of learning providers and employers who have assisted them along their journey”, according to its website.

Among this year’s winners is Justina Blair, who took home the overall apprentice of the year award. Judges said that Blair, a digital and technology solutions apprentice at NatWest, “shows a real passion for the women in STEM agenda” and “works hard to inspire others in innovative ways”.

List of apprenticeship award winners

List of employer and provider award winners

2022 exams: What you need to know about plan B

The government and Ofqual have published a consultation on plan B should GCSE and A-level exams have to be cancelled next year.

While the government is confident exams will go ahead, they have published contingency plans after facing fierce criticism for not doing so last year and being caught out when exams were cancelled after the Alpha variant caused a surge in cases.

The consultation outlines that teacher assessed grades would be used again this year should exams be cancelled.

However schools and colleges are being asked to collect evidence throughout the year, with guidance on how internal assessments should be run, just in case.

The consultation adds that “assessing students in line with the proposed guidance would also support students preparing for the exams we expect them to take next summer”.

DfE and the exams watchdog are now seeking views on the guidance. The consultation closes on October 13.

Here’s what you need to know…

Gap between exams to help stop disruption

Before any plan B is implemented, the government wants to take further mitigation for students next summer. 

As well as the optionality and advanced notice adaptations, exam boards have been asked to ensure there is at least a 10-day gap between exams in the same subject. This is to reduce the risk of students missing all exams in a subject. 

Students who miss one or more exams in a subject will still be able to get a grade through the special consideration process “so long as they have completed the assessment for at least one component of the qualifications”.

Colleges have been provided guidance on how to conduct exams safely, and have been given “general advice” on contingency planning from Ofqual. 

If new public health restrictions affect exams, the DfE will review its guidance and consider whether to put in place an Exams Support Service – as used in the 2020 and 2021 autumn series – to support centres with access to venues and invigilators. 

‘Tighter’ TAGs guidance if exams are scrapped

The government and Ofqual say “if, and only if” the mitigations are not sufficient to allow exams to proceed it will use TAGs to “maintain stability”. 

But they are proposing some changes to the 2021 system, which they admit had “significant workload implications for teachers”. 

They acknowledge the flexibility given to schools and colleges last year to collect evidence saw students in many centres “assessed multiple times in a short timeframe, reducing the already limited teaching time available”. 

Some students and teachers also “raised concerns that different approaches to gathering evidence were being taken in different schools and colleges, which they considered to be unfair”. 

So they think this “tighter guidance” will have advantages such as reducing teacher workload and student anxiety, as well as greater consistency between schools and colleges. That is …

Assess students once a term

In the draft guidance, colleges should plan “assessment opportunities” for TAGs in advance, and secure some evidence early in the academic year – so before Christmas. 

Teachers will want to “guard against the risk of over-assessment”, so a “sensible pattern” could be to plan to assess students once in the second half of the autumn term, the spring term and the first half of the summer term. 

The tests should allow students an opportunity to show their knowledge and understanding across the full range of content they have been taught. Teachers should also think about “specific assessment opportunities which would provide evidence from a significant proportion of the specification”. 

The tests will also help inform teaching and learning, the consultation says. Colleges should also support students to complete their non-examined assessments. 

Students to be told if test is for TAG

DfE and Ofqual say students should be told before they take the assessment that their performance in the assessment “would be used to inform their TAG if exams were cancelled to ensure they have time to prepare”. 

They should be told the aspects of the content the test will cover, but not the specific questions. 

Under the plans, students in the same cohort should be assessed using the same approach where possible and all the assessments taken should be used to determine the TAG – not just those in which students performed best. 

As in 2021, the centre will have to document the rationale when consistent evidence is not used for a whole class or cohort. Reasonable adjustments should be made where possible for disabled students. 

Teachers shouldn’t determine TAG until exams are cancelled

The consultation says teachers should mark work and carry out any internal standardisation of the marking, in line with exam board guidance where appropriate. 

Students can be provided the marks and feedback, but teachers “must not determine a TAG unless exams are cancelled nor tell their students what their TAG might be”. 

The original work should also be retained by teachers, and student can be given copies if it would help support their learning. 

‘Confidence of authenticity’ if tests can’t happen

Where disruption does not allow for assessments or coursework to be completed, colleges should arrange to collect evidence “that provides equivalent confidence of authenticity” and of “equivalent breadth” where possible.

If that’s not possible, centres may also need to collect evidence that is not based on such assessments for either a whole cohort or for individual students. Coursework can also be marked if partially completed. 

If this happens, colleges should record those decisions and the disruption experienced for inclusion in a centre policy. 

No extra exam board materials

DfE and Ofqual say that because exam boards provided past papers and test materials in 2021, they “do not believe” further material is necessary. 

But they are “interested in views” on any additional support the boards could provide to teachers if TAGs are needed. 

Exams would only be cancelled nationally

As in 2021, Ofqual proposes that a “national approach” should be taken to exam cancellation and contingency arrangements. 

They “recognise that regional differences” in the impact of the pandemic could potentially “make it easier or harder for exams” to take place in certain parts of the country than others. 

But they “believe that it would not be acceptable or command public confidence” to have difference approaches to awarding grades for the same qualifications. 

“It would not be possible to align the standards of grades awarded to some students who had taken exams with the TAGs determined by teachers, without the use of a standardisation approach of the type that proved unacceptable in 2020.” 

Private candidates should work with centres

If exams are cancelled private candidates wanting to get a TAG would need to make arrangements with a centre to complete the assessments in supervised conditions. 

DfE and Ofqual propose recommending these students discuss these arrangements with centres and take them into account when choosing where they want to register for exams.

Rather than having assessments spread out across the year, private candidates could undertake their assessments in a more concentrated period. 

Quality assurance and appeals same as 2021

The quality assurance and appeals processes appear to be largely similar to the 2021 process. 

The consultation proposes that colleges should only develop centre policies if exams are cancelled “to avoid diverting resources from other priorities”. The details of TAG quality assurance would be published after exams were cancelled. 

Centres would also have to submit evidence again – perhaps for more students than 2021, the plans say. 

It is envisaged that the same appeals process will be used, but as 2021 appeals are still ongoing “exam boards will want to ensure lessons are learned from that process”. 

2022 exams: Adaptions and grading plan finally confirmed

Students sitting GCSEs and A-levels next summer will sit adapted exams and receive grades that are a “midway” point between last year and pre-pandemic 2019 results.

The government said a “transition” year before grades return to pre-pandemic levels in 2023 will “provide a safety net” for this year’s cohort “as well as a step back to normality”.

Ofqual has also confirmed today that adaptations such as optionality and advanced notice of exam content will be made to next summer’s exam series. 

The government is also set to publish contingency plans today should exams be cancelled again. A consultation will propose teacher-assessed grades are used, and that colleges will need to start collecting students’ work as evidence from after October half-term.

Education secretary Nadhim Zahawi said they have put “fairness at the heart” of their approach, listening to students, teachers and parents. 

New Ofqual chief regulator Dr Jo Saxton said the approach will “recognise the disruption experienced by students taking exams” this year. 

“It will provide a safety net for those who might otherwise just miss out on a higher grade, while taking a step back to normal,” she added.

The plans have also been welcomed by sector associations. Bill Watkin, chief executive of the Sixth Form Colleges Association, said, “The DfE and Ofqual seem to have got this right, with the plan to reduce the content in some subjects and give advance notice of topics in other subjects, and with the decision to delay the return of grade boundaries to 2019 levels.”

Here’s what you need to know….

Grading ‘transition year’ as results return to normal in 2023

This year will act as a “transition year” to “reflect the recovery period”, Ofqual said. Grade boundaries will be set by exam boards at a “midway” point between 2021 and 2019, the last time exams were sat before the pandemic.

Grades are expected to return to normal by 2023. The approach will “provide a safety net for this year’s students as well as a step back to normality”, the government said.

Grade boundaries will be set by senior examiners after they have reviewed students’ work. 

While results will be higher than pre-pandemic exams, the exact position may vary by subject and grade because of a shift in entry profiles (for instance, more higher attainers taking a particular subject).

Top grades soared in the last two years where exams did not go ahead. The proportion of A-A*s at A-level rose from 25.2 per cent in 2019 to 44.3 per cent this summer. 

Meanwhile, at GCSE the proportion of grade 7s and above issued to 16-year-olds in England rose to 30 per cent this year, up from 27.5 per cent in 2020 and 21.8 per cent in 2019.

Autumn series results, including for GCSE English and maths resits, will be aligned to summer 2021 grading. 

This year’s A-level students will have not sat formal GCSE exams as they were cancelled and replaced with centre assessed grades in 2020.  

Optionality and advance notice confirmed

There will be a choice of topics in some GCSE exams this year, such as English literature and history.

Where there is not a choice of topics, advance information will be provided to help students target their revision. There will also be support materials like formulae sheets in maths. 

Advanced information will be released by February 7, before half term, but the timing will be kept “under review subject to the course of the pandemic” and can be brought forward. 

Paul Whiteman, general secretary of school leaders’ union NAHT, said they remained concerned at the February date as it would “limit the desired impact”. 

“Providing this information sooner would help to reduce the differential impact of the pandemic on students so far,” he added.

The consultation on the plans, launched in July, had more than 6,000 responses. The government’s response is due to be published today, but is it expected to be largely the same as the proposals.

Colleges should start collecting plan B evidence this term

The government was lambasted for not having an “off-the-shelf” plan B ready for when exams were cancelled in January. But a two-week consultation is due to launch today outlining the DfE and Ofqual’s proposals. 

These are that if exams cannot go ahead next year – either because of further disruption or because of public health advice – teacher assessed grades will be used again. 

DfE and Ofqual say assessments that take place over the course of the year already – such as coursework and mocks – will make up the evidence base wherever possible. 

Colleges will be asked to start collecting this evidence from the second half of this term. 

Students will be told beforehand by their teacher if any work could contribute towards a TAG. Also the time that students spend in assessments this year will be limited so they take no longer than the total exam time for that subject. 

The department hopes that this will be less burdensome than last year and final guidance would be published after half term. There will be no cut off point on when the plan B can be implemented.

No decision has been made on the grading standards if TAGs are used. 

Whiteman said it is “vital” the evidence collection works “alongside the teaching, learning and assessment which teachers have planned for this year”.

“It should not create significant additional workload for teachers nor add pressure to students who are working hard to complete their courses,” he added.

‘Benefit of the doubt’ on UCAS grades

Ofqual recommends that teachers use the familiar 2019 standards as the basis for predicting students’ grades for UCAS. But borderline students should get the “benefit of any doubt”. 

This means if a student is likely to be on the borderline between two grades, they should predict the higher one. 

Ofqual said that in recent pre-pandemic years, overall grades have been “generously predicted” by teachers. 

Vocational and technical qualifications

The Education Policy Institute has said: “A chief concern of ours that is yet to be addressed by the government is the large gap between students taking academic and vocational qualifications.”

David Robinson, director of post-16 and skills at the institute warns: “Academic students saw far greater increases in their grades in 2020 and 2021 and may continue to do so under these plans. The government must take action and provide assurances to vocational students that they will not lose out under this system.”

Assessment arrangements for vocational and technical qualification have already been announced, but VTQ awarding organisations will be told to “take account” of the assessment approach taken for GCSEs and A-levels when setting their own standards so students are not disadvantaged.

The first cohort of T Level students are due to complete their qualifications in 2022. Guidance for those learners will say that should planned exams and assessments not be able to go ahead, TAGs will be used. However, practical competence assessments may need to be delayed under contingency arrangements.

Back to normal on results days 

This year, results days were held earlier and in the same week, two days apart. But these too are going back to normal. So, A-level results day is on August 18 and GCSE results day on August 25.

The FE Week Podcast Trailer

On Friday, we will be launching a brand new service to complement our news service. The FE Week Podcast will bring you engaging commentary and discussion every week for your commute, your lunch break, or wherever else you enjoy your podcasts. Hosted by FE Week editor, Shane Chowen. Shane will be joined by special guests from across the education and skills sector.

Listen to the trailer below and hit the subscribe button to register for updates.

ESFA opens bids for new 16 to 18 traineeships contracts

Providers have been given three weeks to bid for a contract in the government’s 16 to 18 traineeships “market entry exercise”.

The Education and Skills Funding Agency finally launched the opportunity today in a bid to rapidly ramp up the number of young people taking part in the pre-employment programme.

A deadline of 22 October has been set for applications. The agency intends for providers to start delivery from the beginning of December and run until 31 July 2022.

Contracts worth between £100,000 and £300,000 are available, with £30 million in total up for grabs.

The agency has launched the exercise in the face of poor engagement with the scheme, which comes despite a target from chancellor Rishi Sunak to triple the number of starts in both the 2020/21 and 2021/22 academic years backed with almost £250 million.

A progress report for the Sunak’s Plan for Jobs was published earlier this month and revealed there were 17,000 traineeship starts last year – 46 per cent of the government’s 36,700 target.

Ministers hope to achieve 43,000 starts on the scheme this year.

The ESFA was relying mainly on colleges with 16-to-19 study programme contracts to ramp up their traineeships delivery but has now conceded they need to expand the independent training provider market to achieve significant growth.

Officials have been promising a 16 to 18 traineeship market entry exercise all year but has been slow to get it off the ground. This is despite the agency running a procurement to expand the 19 to 24 traineeship provider base, although that was beset with delays.

To be eligible, providers must be rated by Ofsted as either ‘outstanding’ or ‘good’ and hold another ESFA contract for the 2021/22 academic year.

However, the agency said it will “consider existing traineeship providers that have a 19 to 24 traineeship 2021 to 2022 contract without an Ofsted grade one or two”.

Providers must not be in formal intervention, must not have been issued with a notice to improve, not be subject to an investigation for breach of contract and/or failed audit in the past three years, and not have a financial health grade of ‘inadequate’.

Jane Hickie, chief executive of the Association of Employment and Learning Providers said the opening of the market entry exercise is “incredibly welcome news”.

“If we are to have any hope of hitting the chancellor’s ambitious targets of trebling the number of participants on traineeships, it’s only right that independent training providers – who already have a great record of delivering 19+ traineeships – can support delivery at 16 to 18 too,” she added.

“The bid deadline is tight, so I would urge providers who are thinking of applying to do so quickly.”

DfE confirms remits for FE’s two new ministers

The Department for Education has confirmed how FE and skills policies will be split between minister for higher and further education Michelle Donelan and the new minister for skills Alex Burghart.

This comes after FE Week broke the news Donelan would be adding further education to her universities remit, following Gillian Keegan’s move to the Department for Health during the reshuffle.

Donelan and Burghart released a statement last week confirming FE and skills policy would be run jointly between them.

The Department for Education has now confirmed which of them will be responsible for which policy area.

Donelan, who now attends cabinet as minister for higher and further education, will oversee the following:

  • strategy for post-16 education
  • higher technical education (levels 4 and 5)
  • further education funding and accountability
  • lifelong learning entitlement
  • Institutes of Technology and National Colleges
  • universities and higher education reform
  • higher education quality
  • student finance (including the Student Loans Company)

Burghart, in his first ministerial job as minister for skills, will look after:

  • further education providers including provider finances and workforce
  • T Levels and qualifications reviews (levels 3 and below)
  • apprenticeships including pre-apprenticeships
  • adult education, including the National Skills Fund and the UK Shared Prosperity Fund
  • Skills Accelerators and Industry Training Boards
  • careers education, information and guidance including the Careers and Enterprise Company
  • reducing the number of young people who are not in education, employment or training
  • student experience and widening participation in higher education
  • international education strategy including education exports and international students

Responsibility for post 16 strategy was previously shared between the skills minister and the universities minister, however that now sits solely with Donelan. The only responsibility they will share will be the response by universities, higher education institutions and further education to Covid-19.

Three more college strikes abandoned as 10 other walkouts get underway

Staff walkouts at three colleges have been abandoned after eleventh hour pay offers were received.

University and College Union strikes had been set to go ahead at 13 colleges across England from today, but that number has now reduced to 10.

The action has been suspended at City of Bristol College and New College Swindon after management made a late pay offer, which staff are “considering”, a UCU spokesperson said.

And strikes are completely off at Weymouth College after staff accepted an offer.

UCU said that if colleges want to avoid further disruption they need to “follow the lead of these colleges and get around the negotiating table”.

The union is demanding a pay increase of greater than 5 per cent to “close the school-college pay gap” which currently stands at £9,000, and after more than a decade of below inflation FE pay increases.

Despite this demand, staff at Weymouth College voted to end strike action after receiving a 2.2 per cent back-dated pay award.

A Weymouth College spokesperson said: “A 2 per cent pay award for all staff had been part of Weymouth College budget planning since January 2021 and the college was pleased to award this in July 2021 (at 2.2 per cent) backdated to April 2021.

“The Weymouth College members have voted to accept this final award. The UCU have advised that the dispute with Weymouth College is now settled and there will be no industrial action taken in relation to it. The college has met regularly with both local and regional UCU representatives and has maintained honest, open and transparent discussions.”

City of Bristol College, New College Swindon and the UCU were not able to divulge the pay offers currently on the table that have suspended strikes because negotiations are ongoing.

Rich Harris, principal of City of Bristol College, said: “City of Bristol and UCU are in ongoing and constructive discussions. Union colleagues have suspended the strike action that was due to take place on 28 September to allow for further consultation.”

A spokesperson for New College Swindon said the college was “pleased that UCU have suspended strike action” and hope that this “damaging dispute” can be “brought to an end through agreement on a range of matters such as pay harmonisation and family friendly flexibilities to support wellbeing”.

FE Week reported last week that strikes scheduled for this month at Sheffield College and City College Plymouth had also been called off following last-minute pay agreements.

Today’s strike is the first of up to 10 days of walk outs in this latest wave of UCU industrial action over pay.

Staff at five of the 10 colleges will also be out on Wednesday, in a two day strike. Pickets are taking place at all affected colleges from 8am.

The dispute has arisen following a pay offer of 1 per cent from employer body, the Association of Colleges, in December 2020. The AoC said members could only offer that pay rise because of the unforeseen and “severe financial pressure” colleges were facing owing to the Covid-19 pandemic that has “forced many into deficit”.

UCU general secretary Jo Grady said: “College leaders are facing strike action and severe disruption because they have refused to negotiate on pay. If they want to avoid further disruption they need to follow the examples of Weymouth, Bristol and Swindon colleges and meaningfully negotiate on wages.”

DfE wants HGV bootcamps up and running in a month

Skills bootcamps for heavy goods vehicle drivers are hoped to be on the road by November, the government has revealed.

An “accelerated, light touch” procurement of providers to train 3,000 new drivers is expected to launch this week and close on 22 October.

Advertising the training, recruiting learners and starting provision will have to be done swiftly to “start onboarding by November to tackle the sector challenges”, according to a prior information notice published today, though all this is only an “indicative” timetable.

By comparison, it took the DfE six months to award providers with contracts to deliver skills bootcamps in areas like digital skills and construction after announcing the policy in September 2020.

Bootcamps will put learners through ‘full process’ to become HGV drivers

The new bootcamps are being set up after a lack of HGV drivers was blamed for weeks of distribution issues affecting businesses such as supermarkets and fuel stations.

The driver shortage has been attributed to the Covid-19 pandemic, Brexit, and poor conditions for drivers. Today’s notice says the aim of these bootcamps will be to “secure learners a more sustainable job and higher wages over time”.

bootcamps
Nadhim Zahawi

Announcing the bootcamps on Saturday, new education secretary Nadhim Zahawi said: “We are taking action to tackle the shortage of drivers by removing barriers to help more people to launch new well-paid careers in the industry, supporting thousands to get the training they need to be road ready.”

As well as the 3,000 drivers going through bootcamps, the government will also be using the adult education budget to train an extra 1,000.

Suppliers for this bootcamp tender “must deliver the full process from recruitment of learners, through the entire training and licensing process required to become an HGV driver,” the prior information notice reads.

As with existing skills bootcamps, courses will last 16 weeks and are for learners aged 19 or over. There must also be a guaranteed interview at the end of the programme for every participant.

Learners will be taught how to pass their “Cat C or Cat C and Cat C + E licences” – which allow an individual to drive a vehicle weighing more than 3.5 tonnes.

Providers will have to run practices and the tests for those licences, as well as training to use industry tachographs, for handling specific vehicles for certain employers, and any other training requested by employers. Providers will also need to medically assess learners.

DfE wants to provide ‘road ready’ drivers

A market engagement event is planned for 30 September where the DfE will discuss its plans to provide “road ready” drivers for employers.

Anyone interested in attending should email skills.bootcamps@education.gov.uk by 12.30pm on 29 September with the organisation name contact details and job titles for a maximum of two attendees.

The invitation to tender is planned to be published on the Jaggaer platform this week.

The prior information notice does not reveal how much this contract is worth in total.