Interesting fact: Diana’s career in education started teaching ESOL for two hours a week at her local FE college
Daniel Grimes
Assistant Principal: Quality and Student Experience, Leeds College of Building
Start date: January 2026
Previous Job: Head of Quality Improvement, Leeds College of Building
Interesting fact: Daniel was on an episode of ITV’s The Chase where he made it to the final round, but was knocked out by the comedian and talented quiz ‘chaser’ Paul Sinha
Carl Riding
Principal and CEO, Truro and Penwith College
Start date: March 2026
Previous Job: Vice Principal – Employer Partnerships and Adult Provision, NSCG
Interesting fact: Carl has held an Anfield season ticket for 45 years, which he is now planning on passing on to the kids
Liam Sloan greets me at the doors to Bolton College where he welcomes his students every morning. He has the warmth and immaculate tailoring of a man determined to make a good first impression and the firm handshake of one unafraid of high-pressure challenges.
After eight years spent running colleges in New Zealand and Australia, Sloan returned to our shores a year ago to take over Bolton College, which was reeling from a ‘requires improvement’ downgrade and financial turmoil.
Only weeks into the job, he found himself blindsided by the allegations of financial misconduct and racism engulfing its parent university.
But for now, as he ushers me inside to buy me a coffee, his focus is fixed on other matters; making Bolton “the jewel in the crown of the FE sector”.
Liam Sloan with FE Week’s Jessica Hill
A Māori welcome
Sloan’s welcoming gestures are not just because he is endowed with Scottish charm; they carry special meaning as his equivalent to a Pōwhiri,a traditional welcoming ceremony given by the Māori in New Zealand.
Upon moving there in 2016 and starting as executive director of learning, teaching and quality at Nelson Marlborough Institute of Technology (he became CEO a year later), he was not allowed to set foot on campus until he received the chant. He tells me he feels the hairs on his arms stand up as he recalls the Māori embracing him to “please come help us with the challenges we are facing in education”.
NMIT held an ethos of “what’s right for Māori is right for anyone, because they’re the most disadvantaged”.
Their “very inclusive” attitude changed how he “valued and embraced people”, reflected in how he talks about his learners now: “I try to pay as much attention to the T Level learner with a great GCSE profile as trying to retain someone on 40 per cent attendance,” he says.
Sloan found Australia’s treatment of its indigenous people “shocking” in comparison.
He is taking the Pōwhiri example of creating positive first impressions to overhaul his staff induction processes, which are currently a “weakness” of the college.
Mundane form-filling and health and safety checks are to be done online in advance, freeing up time on an employee’s first day for “meeting the leadership team” and being shown that “we’re grateful you chose us”.
Sloan’s dapper ensemble – a pocket square paired with a floral tie and grey waistcoat – is a nod to his past; he began his career in fashion retail. He joined C&A’s graduate management scheme after studying business and human resources at Huddersfield University.
After managing stores in Nottingham and Northampton, he returned to Huddersfield for teacher training, working evenings managing Barnsley College’s training restaurant before taking on his first full-time teaching role at Doncaster College.
His principal then was George Holmes, who subsequently became vice-chancellor of the University of Bolton (now Greater Manchester) and, 26 years later, was once again Sloan’s boss.
Sign outside the University of Greater Manchester; you can still see the words scrubbed out of its previous name, the University of Bolton
Holmes and investigations
On Sloan’s first day at Bolton last December, Holmes gathered his staff to introduce the new principal before declaring to much “cheering and clapping” that they had just received government approval to change their name to University of Greater Manchester.
This did not go down well with neighbouring universities; theUniversity of Manchester described it as “very misleading and confusing”.
But Holmes was “one of the attractions of the job” for Sloan, who assumed the group’s unusual HE-FE structure meant he would have an “understanding of the importance of colleges” and would be “somebody that I can sound board off…because it’s a very lonely job otherwise”.
Holmes seemed to be at the top of his game. After 20 years in the role, theprevious financial year the group’s remuneration committee had raised his pay package from £340,954 to £359,592 (despite the group making 82 staff cuts) on the grounds that “thanks to [his] leadership, his extraordinarily successful wilful institutional building and his financial foresight, the university is potentially well placed to weather the storm generated by many fierce headwinds”.
Holmes was then suspended in May with two senior staff afterGreater Manchester Police revealed they were investigating “allegations of financial irregularities”, with the Serious Fraud Office also reportedly involved.
The Office for Students is now examining whether the university had “adequate and effective management and governance arrangements” in place. The regulator found in June it hadbreached registration conditions by awarding computing courses delivered by Bradford College that were “not assessed effectively”.
The university also commissioned its own internal investigation, led by PricewaterhouseCoopers. Its findings have not been shared with Sloan, who is keen to distance his college from the controversy enveloping the wider group.
In his previous role, Sloan was provost of Federation University Australia and CEO of Tertiary and Further Education (TAFE).
This left him “very much in the middle of the bureaucracy of being in a university”, so he is “grateful” now to be “at arm’s length” from that world.
“I don’t envy not knowing what’s going on… I’ve got so much to do here,” he says.
But he is not entirely disentangled from it, as his college board must gain approval from the university group for its decisions, including their annual budget.
Liam Sloan, Bolton College
Financial turnaround
In the year to July 2024, the university group racked up a £4.1 million deficit, and its college a £864,000 deficit, the latter being partly blamed on “market-fuelled staff shortages and spiralling agency costs”. The college also has a £6.6 million loan for building works, and in February its audit committee raisedconcerns over potential funding errors in a learner recruitment audit.
Following a meeting with the Department for Education, Bolton’s financial health was re-audited from ‘requires improvement’ to ‘inadequate’.
Determined to be “transparent” about their challenges, Sloan invited the FE Commissioner’s team in to provide governance support and conduct a health check.
He “enjoyed working with them”.
“As long as you’re clear around what support you want and don’t need… then we create boundaries,” he says.
The college’s financial fortunes have turned a corner since then, with a £2.2 million surplus delivered last year and the same forecast this year.
This is partly thanks to a smaller reliance on external agency staff. The group created a subsidiary, Bolton Talent Solutions, which provides 85 per cent of the college’s agency workers. It had an average of 111 in-house agency staff last year, almost half of whom have since become college employees.
The subsidiary means the group can do its own staff vetting, without paying hefty £6,000 finder fees. Agency spend dropped from £4.2 million to £2 million last year, with Sloan targeting £1.7 million this year.
Sloan with Aboriginal artwork in his office: the dots represent people coming together to form communities
The change agent
Sloan sees himself as a “change agent” and a “driver to get the best”.
NMIT moved from 13th out of 16 colleges to first in New Zealand’s league tables, and in Australia, his university moved up from eighth to third during his tenure.
He is now determined to make his college “somewhere where people say, ‘if we’re looking for exemplars of good practice, let’s go to Bolton’.
He has put a focus on “continuous improvement”, creating “performance panels” and a new quality assurance framework. Several courses have been placed on “notice to improve” – “not because they’re poor”, but because “quite good” is “not good enough”.
He faced some kickback from staff to his restructuring reforms Down Under, but in Bolton, he says despite introducing “lots of change you would think would put pressure on people, they’re all up for it”.
Whereas Ofsted last year found “low morale”, a recent staff survey found 96 per cent of staff were proud to work there. Two recent pay awards have presumably boosted goodwill.
But Bolton still struggles to find construction, English and maths teachers, and quality in English and maths is “a challenge” for which it is “trying tactic after tactic”.
“At least we can demonstrate to Ofsted that we’re not sitting on our laurels,” says Sloan. “But you can’t tell us what the silver bullet is, so we’re just doing lots of trial and error.”
Tactics include creating an English and maths facility inside the college’s construction area to prevent “leakage” of students heading to the café instead of their next class, with each subject area having its own linked maths and English teachers who then become “more au fait with the subject area”.
Mock exams have been introduced for students not taking November resits, and an advanced practitioner is being recruited as a mentor for maths teachers.
Liam Sloan and his director of strategy and growth, Catherine Langstreth
Sex, drugs and rock’n’roll
Sloan advocated for the importance of English and maths in Australia and New Zealand, where the subjects were not treated as conditions of funding as they are here.
Likewise for tutorials in “sex, drugs, rock’n’roll and financial understanding”, but “bloody hell, did we need them”, he says.
Sloan says New Zealand’s collaborative networks of colleges and universities are “not perfect”, but an improvement on our own system’s “empire-building” and “fighting for money” through bidding processes.
Sloan learned lessons in community involvement overseas which influenced how he drew together 1,100 stakeholders to create a “very much bottom-up” strategic plan for Bolton College, involving students past and present, employers, industry organisations, the DfE, Ofsted and governors.
As a result of their input, the college’s “cold and miserable” welcome area was brightened up, its wi-fi upgraded and seating areas provided for students to socialise between classes.
The college is also changing the operating hours of its outreach provision to meet the needs of parents and carers, and is looking to open for “twilight classes” to extend its teaching capacity.
Bolton College’s rejuvenated entranceway
Vocational value
Sloan was also influenced by how “brilliantly” 14-16 provision was done by colleges in Australia to “instil the value of vocational education as a real alternative to higher education”.
He is helping Bolton’s school heads to build a vocational ‘MBacc’ offer by opening up 14-16 provision at the college from September.
His belief in the value of 14-16 vocational education stems from how, after struggling with engagement at school, a work placement at a farm in Dumfries put him on a vocational journey which “transformed my life”.
Sloan praises his mum for having “worked like a trojan” as a nurse, barmaid and laundry maid to give Sloan what he wanted as a child, which was “everything …I must have been a nightmare for her.”
One memory that stands out for him is waking up crying at night after finding himself alone in their flat as his mum was out working. He knocked for a neighbour, who put him back to bed.
These days, he reflects how he is “ever so grateful” to his mum for how she supported him. She was the main reason he chose to return to UK shores.
True achievement
But for now, Sloan is looking ahead to the next Ofsted inspection, which will be his first in over a decade. In Australia, inspections could be undertaken remotely, with “very limited” lesson observations. Categories were limited to “satisfactory or not”, and much of the quality was measured on “learner voice”.
Bolton is now self-assessing “much stronger” than before, and Sloan is hopeful that Ofsted’s new toolkit will enable inspectors to better consider “the challenges of our local demographic”. Half his learners arrive without GCSE maths and English “so if we are actually hitting the national average, then bloody hell, have we done a great job”.
“I’m not sure that government authorities understand the complexity of what we’re dealing with,” he adds.
Bolton’s attendance is up to 87 per cent from 82 per cent last year, against a 90 per cent target. For those who are “first in family” to come to college, Sloan argues that hitting 70 per cent attendance “is an achievement”.
The week before FE Week’s visit, Bolton gave out gold stars to 420 students who had managed 100 per cent attendance in their first term (compared to 120 last year), almost half being ESOL students who are “amazing in their determination to succeed”.
One learner, “beaming” as Sloan handed him his badge, had been excluded, but was brought back in following an appeal.
This left Sloan “close to tears”. “I just thought ‘we’d written you off, and look at you now’.”
He only excludes learners as a last resort, but takes a “zero tolerance” attitude to bullying.
Ten students were recently suspended for a food fight, which left “a mess”. Cleaners were told it was their job to clean it up, which was “red rag to a bull” for Sloan. The college is investigating, and Sloan is hopeful those involved will return to classes.
As he takes me for a tour and buys me a steak pasty from the college’s new ‘Grab and Go’ fast food café (more affordable for students than the Costa Coffee it replaced), we pass a group of rowdy young learners keen to pose for photos with their principal; he chides some of them for not wearing their lanyards.
It turns out that his morning greetings have not gone unnoticed.
“Last year we barely saw the principal, this year every morning you’re downstairs, greeting everyone,” says one. “You give us motivation.”
Only a fifth of the £4.7 million in rogue Covid incentive payments given to employers to hire apprentices and trainees has been recovered.
An independent report by Covid counter-fraud commissioner Tom Hayhoe found the now-closed Education Skills Funding Agency (ESFA) had recouped £1 million of taxpayer money lost to fraud and error from its pandemic recovery schemes.
His report, which found a total of £10.8 billion of public money was lost to fraud, lambasted government departments’ unpreparedness for the crisis and “inadequate” measures to protect against criminality.
Hayhoe criticised some public bodies’ “inconsistent” approach to fraud risk assessments. Be he praised the Department for Education’s review of fraud dangers by “experienced” counter-fraud professionals.
Under the Conservative government, the DfE introduced employer cash incentives of £1,000 for each traineeship learner taken on in 2020, which could be claimed until the end of July 2022.
Then-chancellor Rishi Sunak concurrently unveiled a £2,000 bonus for employers who hired apprentices aged 16 to 24, and £1,500 for apprentices aged over 25 who were taken on for six months. The incentive for older apprentices was later doubled to £3,000.
The DfE spent £7.2 billion on Covid support, administered mostly by the ESFA, for emergency measures such as distributing laptops to vulnerable students, online classroom resources and employer incentives for traineeships and apprenticeships.
The department later conducted an assurance review of priority spending areas in the 2021-22 financial year.
Hayhoe’s report said the DfE found £9.7 million of detected fraud and error in total from its Covid spending, with £5.1 million recovered so far.
Alongside the ESFA’s £4.7 million lost to fraud and error for apprenticeship and trainee incentives, the report also detailed the recovery of £200,000 from “erroneous” payments made for exceptional costs to schools.
Hayhoe advised the DfE should continue to pursue bogus employer incentive payments, and said the department should use its extended legal powers to enforce recovery.
The public authorities (fraud, error and recovery) act received royal assent last week and creates new powers for government departments to tackle fraud, as well as adding an additional six years to the period during which actions against Covid-19 fraud can be taken.
“Where the pursuit of civil recovery has been unsuccessful, the department should consider utilising external enforcement resourcing given the extension of the statute of limitations granted by [the act],” Hayhoe recommended.
I consider myself, over many years, both a motorcyclist and a cyclist. Yet despite the commonality of two wheels and a helmet, the mindsets are distinctly different.
For the former, I’m a volunteer training officer for a local advanced motorcycle group. And if you boil advanced riding down to its simplest proposition, it is: “Ride as if everything and everyone is trying to kill you, but you can make progress.”
On the other hand, cyclists, (me included) often embody the persona of ‘we are saving the planet’ in our daily commute, expecting appreciation for championing the ‘Cinderella’ of mobility.
As a college chair, what ‘helmet’ do I wear? Every time, it’s that of the advanced motorcyclist.
Having spent the last decade of my career mainly in operational roles, I have long since ceased believing that anyone in a strategy or policy role (private or public) fully understands how the world really works. Nothing personal – their incentives, vested interests and progression paths are simply different from those in frontline roles.
So I start from the perspective that, at best, public policy for colleges will be a patch of oil spilt mid-corner, approached on a relaxing Sunday ride.
But, to quote my favourite tutoring expression, I’m always prepared for it to be a ‘snake skating on a skateboard’ mid-corner instead.
This is not a negative or pessimistic outlook for further education. Over the last 12 months I’ve been visiting each of the campuses of Capital City College, and this has been both a humbling and hugely energising experience.
The professionalism and grit of staff, matched only by the determination of learners to discover a future that is uniquely theirs, are inspiring. I doubt any of them are tentatively waiting for the latest government policy pronouncements.
Having therefore discounted the wider policy environment – and my apologies to the Association of Colleges, I don’t think I’ve ever fully read their weekly email – I approach the role differently.
I mis-recall the Hippocratic Oath of Doctors, but as chair, I start from the persona of ‘don’t mess it up’. Then, I try to follow three simple rules:
1. Governance is a team game
I am proud to have a team of governors who, through the sub-committees, hold the executive to account and strive to protect the assets, experiences and outcomes of all our key stakeholders. This, for me, is where all the hard work is done, and it is consistently underappreciated.
2. Leave strategy to the executive
Governors approve and hold the executive to account for the strategy the executive team designs and implements. The moment governing bodies or non-execs start thinking they know better, you’ve got a one-way ticket to a fractured relationship. In the private sector it is often the CEO who falls in this scenario, still wondering why they were asked to leave for doing what the board asked.
3. Create a safe space for the executive to think
Encourage them to explore the issues on their minds and look further ahead. The best non-execs I’ve worked with are thoughtful people who bring a wider perspective of the external environment and likely directions of socio-economic travel. They modestly share their own experiences not as a prescription, but as a path worth considering, helping the executive generate future thinking to create a future-focused organisation.
All of this I learned and adapted (i.e. forgot and reinvented several times over) from a course I attended at Harvard School of Government nearly 20 years ago.
Coming back to where I started, riding a motorbike is about being anxious and accountable, and ironically is probably where I’m most at ease. So, perhaps being a college chair is just an extension of who I am.
Around one in 50 people of working age in England have limited proficiency in English. This impacts on their ability to function in daily life, contribute to the economy and integrate into communities.
As it is, ESOL provision and funding has decreased significantly over the last 15 years, while demand has risen. So, it is concerning to hear of councils which are considering reducing or removing funding for ESOL provision, which is key to upskilling those who speak English as a second language and creating benefits for the learner and contributions to the country’s economic growth.
Councils have legal duties under the Equalities Act and are required to undertake an equalities impact assessment. Therefore, cutting ESOL funding and access would be counterproductive. It could limit both the employment prospects of people with protected characteristics who don’t speak English as a first language, and affect community cohesion.
Meeting new English language requirements
Speaking English to a good standard is high on the government’s agenda, but an often-overlooked fact is that, of those people of working age who reported that they cannot speak English well or at all, 35 per cent have British nationality (2021 Census).
In the recent post-16 education and skills white paper, we were reassured that the current adult ESOL offer would be reviewed to ensure it meets the needs of individuals to enable progression into employment or training.
For this government’s aspiration to become a reality, there must be accountability about how money is spent locally. This is both the challenge and opportunity of devolution – an opportunity to be responsive to local employer needs, but equally with a possibility to frustrate central government ambitions.
Maintaining ESOL provision isn’t enough
Skills England has stated that the UK’s priority sectors will need 900,000 more workers by 2030. Upskilling is essential to realising this long-term growth.
If we are to address our skills shortage effectively, not only investing in, but rejuvenating our current ESOL offering can be the key to meeting skills gaps. However, it must be done in a way that is relevant for both learners and employers.
I am in agreement with those in the sector who have argued that positioning language development more firmly within the essential skills framework could, if managed well, strengthen pathways and progression.
Indeed, this wider debate overlooks the fact that current ESOL provision offers mainly just the lower level of learning. There is a need for quality English language provision that equips workers with the specific technical language required for skilled employment.
Having this in place could help realise the untapped potential of those skilled workers who come to the UK to fill skills gaps and contribute to the economy.
Much existing provision is not sufficient for equipping learners with the English language skills they need to access higher-level work or for further study, with 85 per cent of learners leaving ESOL provision with entry level 1-3 qualifications.
In the coming years, our biggest challenge will be ensuring that any investment in ESOL is implemented with the needs of these learners in mind.
A national vision for ESOL
English language learning helps people develop skills for our economy and participation in our communities. It is a vital stepping stone for individuals both new to the UK and for the third of the UK population who do not speak English well.
All this points towards the need for a national vision for ESOL. Any vision must be based on the principle of equitable access to high-quality, place-based ESOL across England.
Key ingredients to deliver this vision include clear and stable funding streams, regional coordination of provision, and qualification standards that meet language needs for life and work.
Ultimately, adults who have high English proficiency are more likely to be employed – and so prioritising ESOL offers a saving to the public purse by equipping everyone with the language skills to contribute.
The chair of Parliament’s education committee has criticised government for not directly addressing recommendations set out by its SEND report, calling on ministers to provide a “much more detailed response” in the new year.
The Department for Education has published a 14-page response to the education committee’s “solving the SEND crisis” report, which in September set out 95 recommendations for improving the system.
The report recommended ministers should create a ringfenced funding stream for special educational needs in FE.
It also called on ministers to not remove statutory entitlements to education, health and care plans (EHCPs).
The government has also confirmed SEND tribunals will continue under its reforms, as new data published today showed a continued increase in the number of appeals against EHCP decisions.
Response ‘deliberately high level’
The DfE normally responds to each recommendation from the committee in full. Instead, the response published this week sets out only its principles of reform.
The government said its response “at this time is deliberately high-level and further detail on our plans for SEND reform will be set out in the schools white paper early in the new year following a further period of engagement with children and families”.
But committee chair Helen Hayes (pictured above) said while the committee “understands that the government isn’t in a position to answer our report’s recommendations in detail whilst it is still developing its SEND reforms”, the current response “will only suffice as an interim response”.
This is “because it does not directly address any of our report’s recommendations in the way that is expected of an official response to a select committee inquiry”.
“We expect the government to provide a much more detailed response to our recommendations early in the new year alongside the expected launch of the white paper.
“It is important that the extensive input from individuals and organisations, as well as the hard work committee, is respected and reflected in a detailed response from the government.”
Tribunals to remain
The government has also confirmed SEND tribunals – which rule on EHCP appeals – will continue, after new figures showed an 18 per cent increase in appeals in 2024-25 compared with the previous academic year.
There were 25,002 registered appeals last year, up from just 3,147 ten years ago. An age breakdown shows 7 per cent of appeals were for post-16 education.
Data published by the Ministry of Justice also shows that, as in previous years, the vast majority of cases – 99 per cent – that ended up at tribunal resulted in a finding in favour of parents. These are cases where the appellant wins the majority of the appeal.
Last year, 14,009 appealed were decided on by judges. The decision was only upheld in 143 cases.
Source Ministry of Justice
In its response to the committee, the DfE said it recognised “the need for clear, independent routes of redress, retaining the SEND tribunal as an important legal backstop for families who are unable to find resolution earlier in the process.
But it added that “all parties should work closely and collaboratively to develop solutions to their disagreements, so that children or young people get the support they need quicker without the need for a tribunal appeal”.
Schools minister Georgia Gould told an online consultation event this week the government was “really actively looking at” how to address needs without parents entering the “adversarial” tribunal process.
‘Barriers’ to resourced provision
Georgia Gould
Government is hosting nine face-to-face and five online events aimed at “putting families at the heart” of its plans.
But the “conversation” only runs until January 14 – and leaves little time ahead of the delayed white paper, expected to be published the same month.
Ministers have said they want to see more resourced provision for students with SEND.
Gould said government wanted to understand the “real barriers” to operating such provision.
The chief executive of the higher education regulator will stand down earlier than planned.
Susan Lapworth is set to leave the Office for Students (OfS) at Easter, despite being appointed for a term that was due to end in August 2026.
The announcement comes just weeks after the OfS published its new five-year strategy and follows the government’s post-16 education and skills white paper which bolstered the regulator’s role in overseeing struggling university finances, expanding higher technical education and cracking down on franchising fraud.
The OfS announcement did not include a reason for Lapworth’s departure. FE Week has approached the regulator for comment.
In a letter to education secretary Bridget Phillipson, Lapworth said she was “hugely proud of everything we have achieved” since she joined, initially as director of regulation, in 2018. She became chief executive in May 2022.
Lapworth said: “We have established a new regulator and a regulatory system focused on the interests of students in a sector that has never been regulated in this way before. And we have increasingly focused our regulation on the things that matter most.
“We have acted where students, particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds, are exposed to weak outcomes, poor academic experiences, or sexual misconduct. And we have robustly defended academic freedom and freedom of speech – the essential foundational values of all higher education.”
The move will mark the end of over a decade in higher education regulation for Lapworth, which began as registrar at the Higher Education Funding Council for England, the OfS’s predecessor, in 2014.
She was paid £175,000-£180,000 last year alongside a bonus of £15,000-£20,000.
Lapworth is the second senior OfS staff member to announce their departure from the organisation in as many months. John Blake announced last month he will not be renewing his term as director for fair access and participation. He was replaced on an interim basis by Professor Chris Millward, who first held the role when it was created in 2017.
Phillipson said: “I would like to thank Susan for her dedicated service to the Office for Students and to higher education. Her leadership has ensured that the OfS is now well placed to meet the challenges ahead and help the sector achieve the government’s vision. I wish Susan every success for the future.”
Aspiring successors only have until January 12, 2026, to apply for the role, which has been advertised with a four-year term of office and a salary of £145,000 per annum.
On-screen exams could be introduced for some GCSE and A Level subjects by 2030, the head of Ofqual has said, in a big step towards making exams digital.
Ofqual plans to allow exam boards to introduce up to two on-screen specifications for GCSEs and A Level qualifications with less than 100,000 entries per year.
Chief regulator Sir Ian Bauckham said it was “important to start small” and that Ofqual will “have a very close eye to fairness” when assessing proposals.
It comes after a three-year-long research project by the regulator and the Department for Education, published today, identified “potential benefits” but also “significant challenges” for on-screen exams.
Ofqual has launched a consultation on its proposals running until March 5. The regulator then plans to hold a technical consultation next year, and if plans proceed, exam boards can then submit proposals.
Boards have praised Ofqual’s “rigorous approach” despite plans limiting the scope of subjects eligible for on-screen assessments in the near future.
What subjects could have on-screen assessments?
Exam boards were developing plans for on-screen assessments – but announced they had been delayed in December 2024. All required Ofqual approval.
Pearson Edexcel wanted to give students the choice to take GCSE language and literature on-screen in summer 2025, and OCR had plans to launch a digitally assessed computer science GCSE.
AQA had published proposals for parts of GCSE Italian and Polish to be assessed digitally by 2026, with plans for bigger subjects to be partly on-screen assessed in 2030.
But Ofqual’s proposal means the majority of GCSE subjects would not be eligible for on-screen assessments.
Eligible subjects would include German, which had 32,430 entries last academic year, design and technology (77,770 entries), physical education (79,285 entries), food preparation and nutrition (55,035 entries) and drama (48,650 entries).
For A Level subjects, only maths (105,755 entries) would be disqualified for on-screen assessment, as all other subjects had below 100,000 entries.
Bauckham told FE Week’s sister publication Schools Week: “The first step here is the introduction of specific regulations, and that’s because at the moment, there is no regulation to manage the entry of on-screen qualifications into the market.”
He added it was “important to start small” by targeting GCSE subjects with lower uptakes, as it “would be lower stakes and easier for schools to deliver”.
On what subjects may be chosen by exam boards, Bauckham said: “We think it’s going to be a range. We’re not absolutely certain that all of them are going to submit specifications either.
“Developing a new specification does require resource that they will have to put in.”
On-screen and paper versions would be offered as completely separate qualifications, but it is not clear whether schools and colleges will be able to offer both qualifications with students choosing whether to take an on-screen or paper assessment.
‘A pragmatic way forward’
Exam boards have welcomed Ofqual’s proposals – despite the regulator limiting the subjects it could introduce on-screen assessments for. None shared details of which subjects they were considering.
AQA chief executive Colin Hughes said: “Not introducing digital exams would be a disservice to young people. In many cases, their future jobs will involve digital devices.
“We recognise there are concerns about issues such as fairness, sockets and space. That’s why we believe that digital exams should be introduced in a measured, paced way, beginning with subjects for which digital delivery offers a clear benefit, and where the shift is least disruptive”.
Myles McGinley, managing director of Cambridge OCR, said Ofqual’s “regulatory approach should be robust while allowing for innovation where it improves assessment experience”.
OCR said it will continue its work on a fully on-screen computer science GCSE and will consider other suitable subjects in the coming months.
Chief executive of WJEC Ian Morgan said the proposed cap of 100,000 maximum entries “offers reassurance to stakeholders, particularly schools and colleges, in managing the transition towards greater use of digital assessment and represents a pragmatic way forward”.
Morgan said there remains “substantial work” to be done to assess which subjects would be suitable for on-screen assessment.
Pepe Di’lasio, general secretary of the Association of College and School Leaders, said: “This would represent a significant change, with many practical issues, and a measured approach is the right way to proceed.”
‘Very close eye to fairness’
The exams regulator would also publish guidance on platforms and devices that would be suitable for use in on-screen exams. Students would not be able to use their own device.
Bauckham said when assessing proposals, Ofqual “will have a very close eye to fairness, and anything that is demonstrably going to increase unfairness will be pushed back, and they’ll be asked to think again before they can market it to schools and colleges”.
Schools and colleges will be given three years with an assessment specification before an exam takes place. Two of these will teaching years.
This means the first-on screen assessment would likely be taken towards the end of the decade, Ofqual said.
Research carried out by Ofqual and the DfE found “potential benefits such as improved accessibility, particularly for students with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND), greater operational efficiency, and alignment with a digital society”.
But it continued there are “significant challenges” including “unequal access to digital technology, inconsistent IT infrastructure, technical risks and concerns about fairness, standards and delivery”.
I’ve had enough of the tragedy. Earlier in my career, students I knew were lost through violence. Knives, guns, silly misunderstandings or random unfortunate encounters.
Having been through that, I never ever want to shake another mother’s hand following the murder of her son, trying feebly to express my sympathy in the face of an all-consuming and unfathomable loss that can never be eased or really lived with.
And neither do I ever again want to see parents, siblings or friends broken by the aching, chasm-cracking grief that follows the self-directed violence of yet another student suicide.
I’m not sure those outside education know what is going on amongst our much-maligned Gen-Z population. An Association of Colleges report last year revealed that 75 per cent of FE colleges had five or more students who attempted suicide over the previous 12 months, while 30 per cent reported 10-14 such attempts. Many had more.
Maybe this news has come to most people only as a rumble, distant and quickly passing on the horizon of their awareness. It might even sound hyperbolic or far-fetched.
But it seems that suicide is at pandemic levels for this generation. Over the course of my career, I’ve known more students die by their own hand than from cancer, accidents or any other single cause.
A recent Department of Education review placed greater responsibility on universities to consider the safety of student accommodation from a suicide-prevention point of view. Rightly so.
I’ve seen bright young people who were bursting with life leave our care at college only to then get lost in the wider world of HE, some of them never to return home again.
HE must do what it can to prevent this. Nobody disputes that. But the responsibility placed on HE institutions has forced me to consider our position in FE too.
There’s one area in particular which should stop us in our tracks. You should try walking around your college with the eye of a young person struggling with suicidal ideation. It’s an act that demands some empathy.
What do you see from such an awful angle? Easily-accessed workshops filled with blades? Toilets in which someone could lock themselves away and forever disappear from view?
Maybe, and perhaps most shockingly of all, you start to see the far more fundamental and structural dangers. Many of our college architects of recent years seem to have fallen in love with walkways and balconies.
They provide wide vistas and a sense of scale that might well befit an institution of learning which seeks to open up horizons. They look great, those airy atriums surrounded by floors and floors of learning spaces suggesting scale and ambition.
But now imagine you’re a young person who is finding everything too much. What the dizzying drops now suggest starts to look very different.
I don’t know what to do with the fear this realisation has chilled me with. I don’t know how to retro-fit a college to ensure it is suicide-proof. Maybe that isn’t even possible.
You could employ the kind of netting you see in prisons, which would of course change the whole dynamic and feel of a place, but is that really any kind of solution? You could raise balustrades to make them harder to breach. I just do not know.
I’ll care for the young people in my charge as pastorally as a subject teacher possibly can. I’ll watch for when they’re moving towards the edge. I’ll flag to them the phenomenal services and counselling our colleges try to provide. I’ll do whatever I must to help them navigate this tricky time of life in these pressurised days.
But I cannot help worrying that we’re walking in a dream every time we go blithely through another day without a preventable disaster happening somewhere on our FE estate.
I never want to meet another stunned mum or see another heartbroken dad. So maybe we in FE need to be raising our voices just a little bit more, shouting and screaming to shock wider society into awareness. Before another voice is all too suddenly stilled.