There’s widening participation, but narrowing mental health support

Student mental health has become one of the defining challenges across both further and higher education. Colleges and universities are seeing more learners who are facing anxiety, depression and stress-related issues than ever before. Yet the ability of institutions to respond has not kept pace, resulting in a wider gap between what students need and what academic institutions can provide.

Rising demand, limited capacity

Research by the Association of Colleges  found that 95 per cent of colleges had seen an increase in disclosed mental health difficulties among their 16–18-year-old learners. Similarly in higher education, an Office for National Statistics survey found that around four in ten first-year university students showed symptoms of depression or anxiety.

Waiting lists for counselling and wellbeing services often stretch into weeks, during which time the mental health of these students can worsen.

While both the FE and HE sectors are committed to widening participation, this success brings with it additional complexity. Learners from disadvantaged backgrounds are entering in greater numbers into FE and HE, but they are also more likely to experience mental health challenges (Sutton Trust, 2019). With resources being stretched, often the students who need support the most are struggling to access it.

FE and HE: different contexts, shared challenges

There are some differences between FE and HE. Colleges are catering to a younger audience, many of whom are still trying to navigate through adolescence. They often lack the resilience to deal with major life transitions. Universities, however, are supporting large numbers of international students and mature learners who are balancing multiple pressures.

Despite these differences, the challenge each sector is facing is similar: growing demand with limited resources. Too often, institutions are relying on overstrained counselling services as the first and only line of support, instead of embedding wellbeing across the teaching and learning environment.

The case for early intervention

Evidence has clearly shown that early intervention can make a big difference. In FE, this can mean having regular wellbeing check-ins at enrolment or using pastoral systems to highlight any concerns before they become major problems. In HE, it may involve giving staff adequate training to recognise signs of distress and signpost appropriately.

Having strategies such as flexible deadlines, mentoring schemes and transparent communication around what is expected can decrease stress before it turns into a major crisis. These methods are not resource-intensive, but they require a cultural shift so that responsibility for mental health is seen as shared across the institution, not just left to specialist teams alone to deal with these issues.

Building capacity and partnerships

No institution can solve the mental health crisis on its own. Colleges and universities need to collaborate to build stronger partnerships with local health services, charities and community organisations. Having a joint approach can expand capacity and provide learners with a broader network of support.

At the same time, staff development is imperative. Tutors and lecturers are the very first point of contact, yet many are not prepared to respond to student disclosures. Constant CPD in safeguarding, mental health awareness and referral pathways need to be a part of professional development across both sectors (Universities UK, 2021).

Towards a culture of care

To tackle the mental health gap is not just about offering more counselling sessions, valuable as these are. It is about creating a culture of care that values wellbeing as much as academic success. That means leadership teams must prioritise mental health within strategies, allocate sustainable funding, and ensure accountability for outcomes.

Colleges and universities face immense pressures. But ignoring the mental health of learners is not an option. If FE and HE are truly to prepare students for work, life and active citizenship, then mental health support must be embedded, accessible and prioritised.

The choice is ours invest in early intervention now, or continue to see learners disengage, drop out, or struggle unnecessarily. The mental health gap is not just a student issue; it is a systemic challenge that goes to the heart of education’s purpose.

The AI governor is in the boardroom

Let’s be blunt: the traditional FE boardroom is broken. We celebrate hours of debate as diligence, add mistake-dense paper packs for depth, and often value anecdote over evidence. This isn’t governance; it’s ritual. While we’ve been busy governing in retrospect, a revolution in decision-making has arrived. Artificial Intelligence is no longer a futuristic concept; it is poised to dismantle and rebuild the very foundations of how our colleges are steered.

The choice before us is not whether to engage with this change, but whether we will be its architects or its casualties. The emergence of the ‘augmented governor’ is inevitable. The question is, what will we become?

From gut feeling to guided insight

The greatest myth is that AI will coldly replace human intuition. The reality is the opposite. By cutting through corporate jargon and presenting data in a stark, simple format, AI doesn’t replace the “gut feel”, it focuses it. Consider a debate on student retention. Instead of wading through conflicting reports, imagine an AI synthesis stating: “The core issue in course Z is not academic ability, but a correlation between late-stage financial challenges and drop-out.” Instantly, the discussion is elevated. The governor’s lived experience validates the insight; strategic proposals target the true cause. The AI provides the ‘what,’ and the human board provides the ‘why’ and ‘how.’ The college’s soul isn’t lost; it’s empowered by clarity.

The clerk’s radical elevation

This evolution spells the end of the clerk as a procedural secretary. The role is being reborn as that of a strategic facilitator. This new clerk curates the AI, interprets its outputs within legislative frameworks, and ensures the board’s wisdom is applied to data-driven insights. This is a radical elevation. Tech-savviness will differentiate the best from the rest, but the core skills are still facilitation, influence, and impact. It demands a seat at the senior management table, with the recognition and remuneration that reflects this critical, strategic function.

A pragmatic path forward

For boards hesitant to begin, the path is pragmatic, not perilous.

  1. Start with the Minutes: Use AI to draft minutes for human review, freeing the clerk for higher-value work.
  2. Summarise Submissions: Introduce AI-generated summaries of board papers, ensuring every governor, regardless of background, grasps the core of every issue.
  3. Automate to anticipate: Allow AI to populate risk registers and suggest agenda topics based on emerging trends.
  4. The live dashboard: Integrate financial, academic, and safety data into a simple dashboard, giving the board continuous oversight without burying executives in report-building.

Satisfying the regulators: No black boxes

The Department for Education and Charity Commission will rightly demand accountability. The answer is transparency, not retreat. A strong AI usage policy is essential. It must delineate how AI is used and, critically, identify the unambiguous human intervention points in every process. The minutes must record that “the board considered the AI’s analysis on X, debated its implications, and made the following decision…” This demonstrates that the technology is a supplement to governance, not a substitute for it.

The augmented board is here

A new model is emerging: The augmented board. It is data-informed but human-centred; efficient yet deeply deliberative. It empowers every governor, supports the executive, and elevates the clerk. This is not a threat to tradition but an upgrade to relevance. By embracing this change with courage and clear frameworks, we can forge FE boards that are not only more compliant and financially sound but also genuinely strategic, fully equipped to secure the future of our students and our communities. The time for speculation is over. The time to build is now.

Deals end January strike threat at three colleges

Strikes at three colleges have been called off after teachers agreed to pay awards of between 4 and 7 per cent.

Thousands of University and College Union (UCU) members had voted to down tools this January over pay, working conditions and a demand for national pay bargaining.

But lecturers have in recent days settled their disputes at Lakes College, Runshaw College and York College.

It means 30 colleges are left facing strikes on January 14, 15 and 16, when several vocational and technical exams take place.

UCU opened a nationwide ballot in October after the “disappointing” 4 per cent pay rise recommendation from the Association of Colleges earlier this year.

Union members at 33 of the 54 balloted colleges passed the legally required 50 per cent turnout threshold and backed strike action, demanding pay parity with school teachers, a national workload agreement and binding national bargaining.

Twenty-one colleges failed to meet the threshold, and now 20 colleges have settled their disputes with deals worth up to 8.7 per cent.

Staff in the north step back…

The strike at York College was called off shortly after the ballot results were published in late November. Members accepted a 5 per cent pay award, as well as joint negotiations over workload for 2025-26.

An agreement for a 7 per cent pay rise at Runshaw College, in Leyland, Lancashire, shortly followed.

UCU and Unison members, who represent non-teaching FE staff, will see their pay packages rise in line with sixth-form workers in the new year.

Clare Russell, Runshaw College principal, said: “This uplift brings the top of the main teacher pay scale to £51,714, aligning salaries with those in sixth form colleges, first achieved when we introduced our current teaching staff pay scale in 2023.

“This award has been made possible through strong financial management, buoyant student recruitment and efficient curriculum planning. More than 80 per cent of our income comes from 16- to 18- provision, an area that has benefited from increased national investment.

“We recognise that many colleges rely far more heavily on adult funding, which has been constrained for many years, and we fully support the sector’s national campaign for improved investment in adult education.”

The latest agreement, made earlier this week, was a 4 per cent salary increase for teachers at Lakes College, in Workington, Cumbria, backdated to August.

Chris Robinson, UCU northern representative, said staff had voted to strike through “frustration” that no pay offer was on the table before the national ballot.

“Lakes College only put something on the table just as the ballot was about to close and just as we got over the threshold,” he told FE Week.

Mark Fell, principal of Lakes College, told FE Week that discussions on workload agreements were ongoing.

Jo Grady, general secretary of UCU, said: “We have now resolved our dispute at 20 colleges and, to avoid disruption on campus come the New Year, leaders at colleges where we are still in dispute need to make meaningful offers and show they value their staff.”

…but strikes go on in Capital City

College staff at Capital City strike over pay, workload and bargaining

Meanwhile, FE and sixth form staff at Capital City College (CCC) walked out this week as tensions with senior management escalated over pay and “ripped up” legacy sixth form conditions.

UCU and NEU members, who represent around 60 sixth form lecturers at CCC’s Angel campus – formerly known as City and Islington College, conducted a coordinated two-day strike across the group’s 11 sites in London.

NEU members have had 14 days of industrial action since October over CCC’s “intolerable” plans to freeze sixth-form teacher salaries for two to three years to bring them in line with FE lecturers.

“For the last 30-odd years, we’ve had these conditions despite being part of a bigger further education college,” said Nick Lawson, NEU rep at CCC.

“The college has unilaterally ripped those up, and we want to be returned to our national pay and conditions.

“We’re marching separately but striking together.”

Jeremy Corbyn also attended the picket line at the college group’s Finsbury Park campus, which is located in the MP’s Islington North constituency. Corbyn also lent his support to the UCU’s recent Parliamentary lobby efforts to seek a reversal of adult education funding cuts.

Meanwhile, UCU rep Mustafa Turus said the union’s branch had sought additional industrial action before the end of term.

Members rejected a pay offer of 4 per cent, a 4.5 per cent rise for those on a salary of £25,000 or less, and a one-off payment of £200-250 for those earning £34,000 or less.

Leaders also offered to set up a workload committee, which Turus said was not a tangible solution.

“We cannot wait months and months, if not years, for a workload committee to come to address our urgent concerns,” he said.

CCC declined to comment.

AoC quids in after £9m cash windfall

The Association of Colleges (AoC) has cashed in a £9 million windfall after ditching a pension fund that posed a “significant risk” to its financial stability.

The membership body’s newly published 2025 annual accounts reveal it agreed a settlement with the London Pension Fund Authority after taking the “difficult decision” to remove its employees from the defined-benefit scheme.

The scheme was in deficit for many years, reaching a peak of minus-£21 million in 2021 which meant the college body was technically insolvent.

But following improvements in market conditions, including an increase in interest rates, meant the AoC could exit with a £9.44 million surplus.

Chair Shaid Mahmood (pictured, right) said: “The AoC was technically insolvent for a significant number of years due to the LPFA pension liability.

“Once the LPFA moved to a surplus in 2024, the board discussed the option to withdraw in order to remove the risk and secure AoC’s financial security.

“We had long and detailed discussions across a number of board meetings, giving significant consideration to various options and taking into account the impact on those members of staff who were in the pension.”

The move required the agreement of about half the association’s 148 staff body who were signed up to the scheme.

Hughes enters the £200k club

The 2024-25 accounts also revealed that AoC chief executive David Hughes’ (pictured, left) basic salary grew 5 per cent to £205,905.

This places his salary in the same group as 12 college principals whose basic salary was £200,000 or more per year in the 2023-24 financial year.

Mahmood said: “The remuneration of our chief executive is determined by the remuneration committee which considers performance and impact as well as the market rate for senior, national roles like this one in the same way we set pay at all levels.”

‘Principal risk’

Annual accounts for the college body show its board viewed the pension liability as the only “principal risk” to its financial stability.

The AoC’s fund had suffered a high deficit due to financial reporting standard (FRS) rule 102, which governs how pension liabilities and assets must be accounted for by companies.

This included the association’s lack of security that could be “offset” against the pension deficit, said Mahmood.

The board had chosen to over-pay pension contributions for several years to reduce the liability.

According to its accounts for the year to March 2025, the AoC held £5.4 million in its profit and loss account, a 20 per cent increase on the previous year, and £9.4 million in its pension reserve, a 100 per cent increase.

The London Pension Fund Authority was set up in 1989, has about £8 billion in assets, nearly 100,000 members and 115 contributing employers.

Staff agreed voluntarily

Mahmood said AoC staff were offered two options: either a LPFA defined-benefit pension that required employee contributions based on their salary level, or a defined contribution scheme that did not require contributions.

Defined-benefit pensions offer a guaranteed income for life based on an employee’s salary at or near retirement, and how long they have been in a scheme.

They are generally viewed as more lucrative than defined contribution pensions, which provide an income based on how much the employee and employer invest, and how well those investments perform.

Staff in the LPFA scheme are understood to have “voluntarily” agreed to the change after the AoC offered an “alternative defined-contribution rate” as part of their agreement to exit.

About £1.9 million has been ring-fenced from the £9.4 million to fund this.

Mahmood added: “Our new pension offer for all staff was enhanced and is a good benefit which we are proud to offer.”

Following staff approval, it took LPFA 10 months to undertake the “complex process” to calculate the final settlement.

How will AoC spend the cash?

The AoC has set up a reserves and investment sub-committee to manage its “enhanced reserves” and will share further details “in the new year”.

Mahmood said: “As a board, we are clear the reserves should be utilised carefully to both secure the long-term future of the AoC so that it can continue its work to address current member priorities as well as the position of the sector with government and in wider society.”

The AoC currently represents 191 college members.

A spokesperson for LPFA said: “The LPFA reported a 128 per cent funding level at its last Valuation in 2022 and whilst the 2025 valuation is not yet complete, we expect to report a surplus once again.

“Our latest annual report, published last month, reports consistent year-on-year growth.

“It is not for the LPFA to comment on the benefits the Association of Colleges decides to provide for its employees, but we continue to support employers that provide benefits under the Local Government Pension Scheme.”

Eton gets go-ahead to develop 2 of 3 elite sixth forms

Two “elite” sixth forms proposed by Eton College and Star Academies have been approved, while the government blocked a third.

The trio of post-16 colleges – in Dudley, Oldham and Teesside – were submitted under the previous Conservative government and placed under review last year after Labour took office.

An updated pipeline list confirms that Eton Star Dudley and Eton Star Oldham were both marked to “continue in pre-opening”, meaning they will move forward to the next stage of development. However, Eton Star Teesside has been “minded to cancel”, effectively terminating that proposal though an appeal is possible.

The Department for Education said it chose to only approve new schools and sixth forms that provided a “unique offer for students who would otherwise not get it, without damaging the viability of existing local schools and colleges”.

Sir Hamid Patel, chief executive of Star Academies, said the trust was “delighted” two of its three Eton sixth forms had been confirmed.

“We understand the rationale for not progressing the other project and will look at alternative ways we can create opportunities for young people in those communities,” he added.

Eton College and Star Academies had previously argued their sixth form model would boost aspiration in areas with limited access to high-quality post-16 provision. Critics, however, warned about selective admissions and the risk of diverting resources from existing local colleges and schools.

Principals of Dudley’s three post-16 providers issued a joint response questioning the DfE’s approval of an elite sixth form in their area.

Diana Martin of Dudley College of Technology, Jacquie Carman of Halesowen College, and Holly Bembridge of King Edward VI College, Stourbridge, said: “As leaders of colleges already delivering fantastic outcomes and supporting students of all abilities to reach their potential, we question the decision to prioritise a new selective sixth form in our borough.

“While we welcome investment in education, we think that additional selective capacity is not the answer to Dudley’s specific challenges. The borough currently has one of the highest rates of young people not engaged in education or employment in the West Midlands.

“We believe that public time, money, and attention should be laser-focused on engaging these young people, rather than duplicating provision that already exists and thrives.”

One UTC approved, another axed

The DfE’s announcement had contrasting fortunes for two university technical college (UTC) bids.

Doncaster UTC – Health Sciences and Green Technologies, led by Brighter Futures Learning Partnership Trust, has been allowed to proceed. It will be Doncaster’s second UTC after one specialising in digital and science engineering was opened in 2020.

But UTC Southampton, sponsored by UTC Portsmouth, was canned.

Kate Ambrosi, CEO of the Baker Dearing Education Trust, the charity which represents UTCs, said she was “thrilled” that a second UTC in Doncaster would go ahead but was “naturally disappointed” by the Southampton decision.

“Like the new Doncaster UTC, this would have provided life-changing opportunities to young people in a very deprived area. It would have also helped meet an immense demand for places at UTC Portsmouth,” Ambrosi said, adding that the UTC’s backers would be appealing to the Department for Education for a review of this decision.

In total, 28 of the 44 mainstream free school proposals in the pipeline have been approved (see the full list here).

MOVERS AND SHAKERS: EDITION 517

Diana Bird

Executive Principal, Leeds City College

Start date: Spring 2026

Previous Job: Principal and CEO, Shipley College

Interesting fact: Diana’s career in education started teaching ESOL for two hours a week at her local FE college


Daniel Grimes

Assistant Principal: Quality and Student Experience, Leeds College of Building

Start date: January 2026

Previous Job: Head of Quality Improvement, Leeds College of Building

Interesting fact: Daniel was on an episode of ITV’s The Chase where he made it to the final round, but was knocked out by the comedian and talented quiz ‘chaser’ Paul Sinha


Carl Riding

Principal and CEO, Truro and Penwith College

Start date: March 2026

Previous Job: Vice Principal – Employer Partnerships and Adult Provision, NSCG

Interesting fact: Carl has held an Anfield season ticket for 45 years, which he is now planning on passing on to the kids

Sloan in at the deep end: Liam Sloan, Bolton College CEO

Liam Sloan greets me at the doors to Bolton College where he welcomes his students every morning. He has the warmth and immaculate tailoring of a man determined to make a good first impression and the firm handshake of one unafraid of high-pressure challenges. 

After eight years spent running colleges in New Zealand and Australia, Sloan returned to our shores a year ago to take over Bolton College, which was reeling from a ‘requires improvement’ downgrade and financial turmoil.

Only weeks into the job, he found himself blindsided by the allegations of financial misconduct and racism engulfing its parent university. 

But for now, as he ushers me inside to buy me a coffee, his focus is fixed on other matters; making Bolton “the jewel in the crown of the FE sector”.

Liam Sloan with FE Week’s Jessica Hill

A Māori welcome

Sloan’s welcoming gestures are not just because he is endowed with Scottish charm; they carry special meaning as his equivalent to a Pōwhiri,a traditional welcoming ceremony given by the Māori in New Zealand.

Upon moving there in 2016 and starting as executive director of learning, teaching and quality at Nelson Marlborough Institute of Technology (he became CEO a year later), he was not allowed to set foot on campus until he received the chant. He tells me he feels the hairs on his arms stand up as he recalls the Māori embracing him to “please come help us with the challenges we are facing in education”. 

NMIT held an ethos of “what’s right for Māori is right for anyone, because they’re the most disadvantaged”.

Their “very inclusive” attitude changed how he “valued and embraced people”, reflected in how he talks about his learners now: “I try to pay as much attention to the T Level learner with a great GCSE profile as trying to retain someone on 40 per cent attendance,” he says.

Sloan found Australia’s treatment of its indigenous people “shocking” in comparison.

He is taking the Pōwhiri example of creating positive first impressions to overhaul his staff induction processes, which are currently a “weakness” of the college.

Mundane form-filling and health and safety checks are to be done online in advance, freeing up time on an employee’s first day for “meeting the leadership team” and being shown that “we’re grateful you chose us”.

Sloan’s dapper ensemble – a pocket square paired with a floral tie and grey waistcoat – is a nod to his past; he began his career in fashion retail. He joined C&A’s graduate management scheme after studying business and human resources at Huddersfield University.

After managing stores in Nottingham and Northampton, he returned to Huddersfield for teacher training, working evenings managing Barnsley College’s training restaurant before taking on his first full-time teaching role at Doncaster College.

His principal then was George Holmes, who subsequently became vice-chancellor of the University of Bolton (now Greater Manchester) and, 26 years later, was once again Sloan’s boss.

Sign outside the University of Greater Manchester; you can still see the words scrubbed out of its previous name, the University of Bolton

Holmes and investigations

On Sloan’s first day at Bolton last December, Holmes gathered his staff to introduce the new principal before declaring to much “cheering and clapping” that they had just received government approval to change their name to University of Greater Manchester.

This did not go down well with neighbouring universities; the University of Manchester described it as “very misleading and confusing”.

But Holmes was “one of the attractions of the job” for Sloan, who assumed the group’s unusual HE-FE structure meant he would have an “understanding of the importance of colleges” and would be “somebody that I can sound board off…because it’s a very lonely job otherwise”.

Holmes seemed to be at the top of his game. After 20 years in the role, the previous financial year the group’s remuneration committee had raised his pay package from £340,954 to £359,592 (despite the group making 82 staff cuts) on the grounds that “thanks to [his] leadership, his extraordinarily successful wilful institutional building and his financial foresight, the university is potentially well placed to weather the storm generated by many fierce headwinds”.

Holmes was then suspended in May with two senior staff after Greater Manchester Police revealed they were investigating “allegations of financial irregularities”, with the Serious Fraud Office also reportedly involved.

The Office for Students is now examining whether the university had “adequate and effective management and governance arrangements” in place. The regulator found in June it had breached registration conditions by awarding computing courses delivered by Bradford College that were “not assessed effectively”.

The university also commissioned its own internal investigation, led by PricewaterhouseCoopers. Its findings have not been shared with Sloan, who is keen to distance his college from the controversy enveloping the wider group.

In his previous role, Sloan was provost of Federation University Australia and CEO of Tertiary and Further Education (TAFE).

This left him “very much in the middle of the bureaucracy of being in a university”, so he is “grateful” now to be “at arm’s length” from that world.

“I don’t envy not knowing what’s going on… I’ve got so much to do here,” he says. 

But he is not entirely disentangled from it, as his college board must gain approval from the university group for its decisions, including their annual budget. 

Liam Sloan, Bolton College

Financial turnaround

In the year to July 2024, the university group racked up a £4.1 million deficit, and its college a £864,000 deficit, the latter being partly blamed on “market-fuelled staff shortages and spiralling agency costs”. The college also has a £6.6 million loan for building works, and in February its audit committee raised concerns over potential funding errors in a learner recruitment audit.

Following a meeting with the Department for Education, Bolton’s financial health was re-audited from ‘requires improvement’ to ‘inadequate’.

Determined to be “transparent” about their challenges, Sloan invited the FE Commissioner’s team in to provide governance support and conduct a health check.

He “enjoyed working with them”. 

“As long as you’re clear around what support you want and don’t need… then we create boundaries,” he says.

The college’s financial fortunes have turned a corner since then, with a £2.2 million surplus delivered last year and the same forecast this year.

This is partly thanks to a smaller reliance on external agency staff. The group created a subsidiary, Bolton Talent Solutions, which provides 85 per cent of the college’s agency workers. It had an average of 111 in-house agency staff last year, almost half of whom have since become college employees.

The subsidiary means the group can do its own staff vetting, without paying hefty £6,000 finder fees. Agency spend dropped from £4.2 million to £2 million last year, with Sloan targeting £1.7 million this year. 

Sloan with Aboriginal artwork in his office: the dots represent people coming together to form communities 

The change agent

Sloan sees himself as a “change agent” and a “driver to get the best”. 

NMIT moved from 13th out of 16 colleges to first in New Zealand’s league tables, and in Australia, his university moved up from eighth to third during his tenure.

He is now determined to make his college “somewhere where people say, ‘if we’re looking for exemplars of good practice, let’s go to Bolton’. 

He has put a focus on “continuous improvement”, creating “performance panels” and a new quality assurance framework. Several courses have been placed on “notice to improve” – “not because they’re poor”, but because “quite good” is “not good enough”. 

He faced some kickback from staff to his restructuring reforms Down Under, but in Bolton, he says despite introducing “lots of change you would think would put pressure on people, they’re all up for it”.

Whereas Ofsted last year found “low morale”, a recent staff survey found 96 per cent of staff were proud to work there. Two recent pay awards have presumably boosted goodwill.

But Bolton still struggles to find construction, English and maths teachers, and quality in English and maths is “a challenge” for which it is “trying tactic after tactic”.

“At least we can demonstrate to Ofsted that we’re not sitting on our laurels,” says Sloan. “But you can’t tell us what the silver bullet is, so we’re just doing lots of trial and error.”

Tactics include creating an English and maths facility inside the college’s construction area to prevent “leakage” of students heading to the café instead of their next class, with each subject area having its own linked maths and English teachers who then become “more au fait with the subject area”.

Mock exams have been introduced for students not taking November resits, and an advanced practitioner is being recruited as a mentor for maths teachers.

Liam Sloan and his director of strategy and growth, Catherine Langstreth

Sex, drugs and rock’n’roll

Sloan advocated for the importance of English and maths in Australia and New Zealand, where the subjects were not treated as conditions of funding as they are here.

Likewise for tutorials in “sex, drugs, rock’n’roll and financial understanding”, but “bloody hell, did we need them”, he says.

Sloan says New Zealand’s collaborative networks of colleges and universities are “not perfect”, but an improvement on our own system’s “empire-building” and “fighting for money” through bidding processes. 

Sloan learned lessons in community involvement overseas which influenced how he drew together 1,100 stakeholders to create a “very much bottom-up” strategic plan for Bolton College, involving students past and present, employers, industry organisations, the DfE, Ofsted and governors.

As a result of their input, the college’s “cold and miserable” welcome area was brightened up, its wi-fi upgraded and seating areas provided for students to socialise between classes.

The college is also changing the operating hours of its outreach provision to meet the needs of parents and carers, and is looking to open for “twilight classes” to extend its teaching capacity.

Bolton College’s rejuvenated entranceway

Vocational value

Sloan was also influenced by how “brilliantly” 14-16 provision was done by colleges in Australia to “instil the value of vocational education as a real alternative to higher education”.

He is helping Bolton’s school heads to build a vocational ‘MBacc’ offer by opening up 14-16 provision at the college from September.

His belief in the value of 14-16 vocational education stems from how, after struggling with engagement at school, a work placement at a farm in Dumfries put him on a vocational journey which “transformed my life”. 

Sloan praises his mum for having “worked like a trojan” as a nurse, barmaid and laundry maid to give Sloan what he wanted as a child, which was “everything …I must have been a nightmare for her.”

One memory that stands out for him is waking up crying at night after finding himself alone in their flat as his mum was out working. He knocked for a neighbour, who put him back to bed. 

These days, he reflects how he is “ever so grateful” to his mum for how she supported him. She was the main reason he chose to return to UK shores.

True achievement

But for now, Sloan is looking ahead to the next Ofsted inspection, which will be his first in over a decade. In Australia, inspections could be undertaken remotely, with “very limited” lesson observations. Categories were limited to “satisfactory or not”, and much of the quality was measured on “learner voice”.

Bolton is now self-assessing “much stronger” than before, and Sloan is hopeful that Ofsted’s new toolkit will enable inspectors to better consider “the challenges of our local demographic”. Half his learners arrive without GCSE maths and English “so if we are actually hitting the national average, then bloody hell, have we done a great job”.

“I’m not sure that government authorities understand the complexity of what we’re dealing with,” he adds. 

Bolton’s attendance is up to 87 per cent from 82 per cent last year, against a 90 per cent target. For those who are “first in family” to come to college, Sloan argues that hitting 70 per cent attendance “is an achievement”.

The week before FE Week’s visit, Bolton gave out gold stars to 420 students who had managed 100 per cent attendance in their first term (compared to 120 last year), almost half being ESOL students who are “amazing in their determination to succeed”.

One learner, “beaming” as Sloan handed him his badge, had been excluded, but was brought back in following an appeal. 

This left Sloan “close to tears”. “I just thought ‘we’d written you off, and look at you now’.”

He only excludes learners as a last resort, but takes a “zero tolerance” attitude to bullying.

Ten students were recently suspended for a food fight, which left “a mess”. Cleaners were told it was their job to clean it up, which was “red rag to a bull” for Sloan. The college is investigating, and Sloan is hopeful those involved will return to classes. 

As he takes me for a tour and buys me a steak pasty from the college’s new ‘Grab and Go’ fast food café (more affordable for students than the Costa Coffee it replaced), we pass a group of rowdy young learners keen to pose for photos with their principal; he chides some of them for not wearing their lanyards. 

It turns out that his morning greetings have not gone unnoticed.

“Last year we barely saw the principal, this year every morning you’re downstairs, greeting everyone,” says one. “You give us motivation.”

Millions lost in fraud from Covid apprentice payments

Only a fifth of the £4.7 million in rogue Covid incentive payments given to employers to hire apprentices and trainees has been recovered.

An independent report by Covid counter-fraud commissioner Tom Hayhoe found the now-closed Education Skills Funding Agency (ESFA) had recouped £1 million of taxpayer money lost to fraud and error from its pandemic recovery schemes.

His report, which found a total of £10.8 billion of public money was lost to fraud, lambasted government departments’ unpreparedness for the crisis and “inadequate” measures to protect against criminality.

Hayhoe criticised some public bodies’ “inconsistent” approach to fraud risk assessments. Be he praised the Department for Education’s review of fraud dangers by “experienced” counter-fraud professionals.

Under the Conservative government, the DfE introduced employer cash incentives of £1,000 for each traineeship learner taken on in 2020, which could be claimed until the end of July 2022.

Then-chancellor Rishi Sunak concurrently unveiled a £2,000 bonus for employers who hired apprentices aged 16 to 24, and £1,500 for apprentices aged over 25 who were taken on for six months. The incentive for older apprentices was later doubled to £3,000.

The DfE spent £7.2 billion on Covid support, administered mostly by the ESFA, for emergency measures such as distributing laptops to vulnerable students, online classroom resources and employer incentives for traineeships and apprenticeships.

The department later conducted an assurance review of priority spending areas in the 2021-22 financial year.

Hayhoe’s report said the DfE found £9.7 million of detected fraud and error in total from its Covid spending, with £5.1 million recovered so far.

Alongside the ESFA’s £4.7 million lost to fraud and error for apprenticeship and trainee incentives, the report also detailed the recovery of £200,000 from “erroneous” payments made for exceptional costs to schools.

Hayhoe advised the DfE should continue to pursue bogus employer incentive payments, and said the department should use its extended legal powers to enforce recovery.

The public authorities (fraud, error and recovery) act received royal assent last week and creates new powers for government departments to tackle fraud, as well as adding an additional six years to the period during which actions against Covid-19 fraud can be taken.

“Where the pursuit of civil recovery has been unsuccessful, the department should consider utilising external enforcement resourcing given the extension of the statute of limitations granted by [the act],” Hayhoe recommended.

The DfE declined to comment.

Chair of governors’ journey is as perilous as a motorbike ride

I consider myself, over many years, both a motorcyclist and a cyclist. Yet despite the commonality of two wheels and a helmet, the mindsets are distinctly different.

For the former, I’m a volunteer training officer for a local advanced motorcycle group. And if you boil advanced riding down to its simplest proposition, it is: “Ride as if everything and everyone is trying to kill you, but you can make progress.”

On the other hand, cyclists, (me included) often embody the persona of ‘we are saving the planet’ in our daily commute, expecting appreciation for championing the ‘Cinderella’ of mobility.

As a college chair, what ‘helmet’ do I wear? Every time, it’s that of the advanced motorcyclist.

Having spent the last decade of my career mainly in operational roles, I have long since ceased believing that anyone in a strategy or policy role (private or public) fully understands how the world really works. Nothing personal – their incentives, vested interests and progression paths are simply different from those in frontline roles.

So I start from the perspective that, at best, public policy for colleges will be a patch of oil spilt mid-corner, approached on a relaxing Sunday ride.

But, to quote my favourite tutoring expression, I’m always prepared for it to be a ‘snake skating on a skateboard’ mid-corner instead.

This is not a negative or pessimistic outlook for further education. Over the last 12 months I’ve been visiting each of the campuses of Capital City College, and this has been both a humbling and hugely energising experience.

The professionalism and grit of staff, matched only by the determination of learners to discover a future that is uniquely theirs, are inspiring. I doubt any of them are tentatively waiting for the latest government policy pronouncements. 

Having therefore discounted the wider policy environment – and my apologies to the Association of Colleges, I don’t think I’ve ever fully read their weekly email – I approach the role differently.

I mis-recall the Hippocratic Oath of Doctors, but as chair, I start from the persona of ‘don’t mess it up’. Then, I try to follow three simple rules:

1. Governance is a team game

 I am proud to have a team of governors who, through the sub-committees, hold the executive to account and strive to protect the assets, experiences and outcomes of all our key stakeholders. This, for me, is where all the hard work is done, and it is consistently underappreciated.

2. Leave strategy to the executive

 Governors approve and hold the executive to account for the strategy the executive team designs and implements. The moment governing bodies or non-execs start thinking they know better, you’ve got a one-way ticket to a fractured relationship. In the private sector it is often the CEO who falls in this scenario, still wondering why they were asked to leave for doing what the board asked.

3. Create a safe space for the executive to think

Encourage them to explore the issues on their minds and look further ahead. The best non-execs I’ve worked with are thoughtful people who bring a wider perspective of the external environment and likely directions of socio-economic travel. They modestly share their own experiences not as a prescription, but as a path worth considering, helping the executive generate future thinking to create a future-focused organisation.

    All of this I learned and adapted (i.e. forgot and reinvented several times over) from a course I attended at Harvard School of Government nearly 20 years ago.

    Coming back to where I started, riding a motorbike is about being anxious and accountable, and ironically is probably where I’m most at ease. So, perhaps being a college chair is just an extension of who I am.