Skip to content
21 August 2026

Latest news from FE Week

Smaller steps could transform English and maths resits

The Department for Education is currently consulting on proposed post-16 English and maths stepping stone qualifications for students who leave school with a GCSE grade 2 or below. As most of these students study in colleges, how should the sector respond?

Around a third of secondary students do not achieve a GCSE grade 4 in English and/or maths by the age of 16. Although many have developed their literacy and numeracy skills over time, their Year 11 results mean they often arrive at college demoralised and demotivated, while also facing greater socio-economic disadvantage.

College teachers work hard to rebuild these students’ confidence and get them back on track. In 2024-25, more than 70,000 college retakers improved their GCSE grade in either English or maths, and 27,000 (39 per cent) of these improved from a grade 2 or grade 1. From my own experience of teaching basic numeracy, I know that with encouragement, structured support and effective feedback, these students can succeed.

Aiming for fluency in English and maths cannot be optional, and restricting ourselves to the merely ‘functional’ would cap aspiration and add curriculum disadvantage to socio-economic disadvantage. I have spent my professional life arguing against the labelling, tracking and segregation of young people based on prior attainment because we know who loses out in these systems. But there is no magic bullet for raising achievement; it requires a positive institutional culture alongside coherent and well-grounded pedagogy. That is the message of the DfE’s recent publication on effective college retake practice.

So how might new stepping stone qualifications help GCSE retakers? For many students at this level, the gap between where they are and where they want to be can feel too wide. They are a highly diverse group with a broad range of needs, but we know that to re-engage them we must start where they are, while recognising and valuing their progress. The point of a stepping stone qualification is precisely to overcome barriers, break the journey to grade 3 into manageable stages and build confidence for the next step towards grade 4.

The Social Mobility Commission has recognised the importance of smaller, incremental steps rather than a ‘massive leaps’ approach. Social immobility is shaped by a complex interaction of inequalities and will not be solved simply by introducing a new qualification. However, well-designed stepping stones can help support progression.

Providing stepping stones is what colleges already do. Everything we offer students is a step towards something else: employment, higher-level qualifications or further skills development. A good stepping stone should build confidence and mastery while leading somewhere meaningful. It should value incremental progress towards a shared goal and ensure that no one is excluded, segregated or left on a road to nowhere. That is the exact opposite of a two-tier or tracked system.

We also need to avoid myth-making about new qualifications before we know what they will look like. At this stage, the design is still under discussion, but some points are already clear. First, the standard will be pitched at a strong GCSE grade 3 which, like grades 1 and 2, sits within level 1. Progress within a level does not mean standing still; it is real progress and can be measured. Second, there is no suggestion that stepping stone qualifications will be mandatory or that learners will be prevented from retaking GCSEs as soon as they are ready. Third, they may not have a simple pass/fail outcome, with grading at both module and qualification level appearing possible.

Reform always creates pressure and brings opportunity costs. But change in this area is long overdue, and the benefits of a more inclusive and staged approach, alongside the proposed pedagogical support, could far outweigh the initial costs.

College English and maths teachers deserve the best possible tools for the work they do. That includes qualifications which recognise student progress at every stage, from GCSE grade 1 towards grade 4 and beyond. Stepping stones may be exactly what we need to support students who have experienced the stumbling block of “failure” at 16.

Whether you agree or not, please engage with the DfE consultation.

 

 

 

 

 

Learning Curve Group appoints new CEO

Large national training provider Learning Curve Group (LCG) has appointed a new CEO five months after its high-profile boss suddenly stepped down.

Durham-based LCG, whose previous chief executive Brenda McLeish left in December, has now announced Tracey Fletcher-Ray as its new CEO.

Until last September, Fletcher-Ray was CEO of Witherslack Group, one of the UK’s largest special needs businesses. The Abu Dhabi-owned SEND school has seen profits soar in recent years, as education secretary Bridget Phillipson considered new measures to “curb profiteering” by private firms running special schools.

Fletcher-Ray’s career has also included senior leadership roles at organisations like Barclays and Bupa.

LCG has more than 55 sites across England and Wales, an annual turnover of about £59 million and is owned by Agilitas Private Equity.

The new CEO said: “I’m excited to be joining at such an important stage in the organisation’s journey and look forward to building on the strong foundations already in place.

“My focus will be on continuing to support quality, culture and sustainable growth, ensuring Learning Curve Group continues to make a meaningful impact for learners, employers and communities.”

Fletcher-Ray has previously worked in the housing, banking, education, healthcare, and chemical industries.

Her previous role at Witherslack Group involved oversight of a £208 million turnover education business, which is majority owned by Mubadala Capital, a subsidiary of the Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund.

She is also a non-executive director on the board of Social Housing REIT, has previously been a non-executive board member at housing association L&Q.

Until Fletcher-Ray’s appointment, LCG had been run on an interim basis by its strategic board.

The training provider group, which has more than 15 subsidiaries, delivers a range of education and training, including employability, adult learning and skills bootcamps.

Its most recent accounts suggest some uncertainty over its finances, including about £86 million in external borrowing by its parent holding company, due to expire in March this year but with an option to extend until August.

Last week, FE Week revealed that LCG launched legal proceedings against Tees Valley Combined Authority.

Shortly afterwards, the combined authority paused its adult education contract procurement process, which LCG also is bidding for, although it remains unclear if the two are linked.

Last year, LCG came to a secret financial settlement with the Department for Education following a legal dispute about losing out on a national adult education budget contract in 2023.

Ofsted considers replacing glitchy evidence-gathering system

Ofsted is considering replacing the electronic evidence-gathering (EEG) system used by inspectors following years of issues.

The system was introduced in 2019 to replace paper records, but has faced repeated and sustained software glitches which in the most serious cases led to the loss of key inspection evidence.

The inspectorate is now considering a replacement.

An Ofsted spokesperson told FE Week’s sister title Schools Week: “We’re currently undertaking a programme of digital modernisation aimed at ensuring long-term and sustainable digital inspection tools – including evidence gathering tools.”

No timeline has yet been confirmed for when a new system could be introduced.

Matt Newman, national officer at inspectors’ union the FDA, said they had been “consistently flagging concerns around the effectiveness of EEG as a tool for our members.

“We welcome the news that the system may be completely replaced.”

‘Problematic from the outset’

Newman added that it was “essential” members “have access to reliable and top class digital tools to deliver for parents and children”.

Former HMI Frank Norris said he too was “pleased to discover Ofsted is reviewing the EEG”, describing it as “problematic from the outset”.

He said he recently heard of an inspection at which the “system crashed and significant amounts of evidence were lost”.

“Completing inspections in the available time is tough without having these additional burdens thrown in as well.”

Norris said inspectors regularly reported having “little confidence in the EEG” and “many…have created protocols and processes to ensure they are not left high and dry when the system crashes”.

Long history of glitches

Developed for Ofsted in 2017, the EEG was launched for all schools, FE and skills inspections in September 2019. It was then rolled out to initial teacher education inspections in 2021.

Both full-time his majesty’s inspectors (HMI) and part-time Ofsted inspectors use it to record written notes during inspections, which are uploaded to a cloud.

Following the on-site part of inspections, a lead inspector uses their team’s notes to write a draft inspection report.

Ofsted said the electronic system helped inspectors better “review and synthesise their notes” and offered a “notable improvement” in security.

But Schools Week revealed in 2024 that long-running issues meant inspectors had for years suffered glitches that wiped data about inspections.

‘Disappearing’ evidence

Inspectors described how screens would freeze and evidence “disappeared” before their eyes mid-visit. Others found evidence had been wiped after they had left the inspection.

This prompted chief inspector Sir Martyn Oliver to commission a rapid review.

The internal investigation revealed that of the 26,431 inspections made using the EEG between February 2021 and May 2024, inspectors reported evidence was lost in 191 cases.

Only four of these resulted in inspectors returning to gather extra evidence, while the inspectorate said it was “confident that the judgement…is secure” for the other 187.

The report noted benefits of the EEG, such as “significantly” strengthening the quality assurance process.

But it acknowledged there “have been some technical issues with stability and reliability” since it was introduced. It said some issues were linked to the application itself, and some to the Microsoft technology it was built on.

‘Technical issues’ persist

The review said Ofsted hae made improvements over time, but there were “still issues with the application intermittently ‘freezing’ and closing unexpectedly” on some inspections which it said “does create uncertainty and additional workload for inspectors”.

The issues have continued since the renewed education inspection framework was launched late last year.

In an email to inspectors in December, Ofsted revealed “an underlying technical issue” had been “causing EEG to freeze when inspectors type notes directly into the application”.

Ofsted said a “contingency plan” had been put in place. It is understood this involves inspectors recording notes using Microsoft Word. But there have been reports of crashes when the data is finally uploaded to Ofsted’s system.

Contingency still in place

Ofsted’s email in December said this was “a temporary measure” and that it would provide an update by February half-term.

However, the watchdog confirmed on Monday the contingency arrangement is still in place.

A spokesperson said Ofsted is working with Microsoft, and is currently testing a fix to the platform on which the EEG was built.

“Once we have confirmed it is working reliably, we will consider whether we transition back to using EEG until any new digital tools are ready to launch.”

Lorraine Heath made permanent principal of Basingstoke College

Basingstoke College of Technology (BCoT) has announced long-serving staff member Lorraine Heath as its permanent principal.

Heath has worked at the college for almost 30 years and was most recently deputy principal for curriculum, performance and innovation before being made acting principal in February.

She took on the position as interim accountable officer after the sudden retirement of Anthony Bravo, who served the college as principal for over 16 years and stepped down in the middle of the academic year to “focus on his charitable activities”.

Mike Howe, BCoT chair of governors, said Heath has been a “cornerstone of BCoT for almost 30 years”, serving the last seven years with “incredible dedication and distinction as our deputy principal”.

He added: “During the rigorous and transparent interview process, it became clear that Lorraine’s deep understanding of our college culture, combined with her bold vision for our future, makes her the perfect person to lead us into this next chapter. No one understands the heart of this college better than Lorraine, and we are thrilled to see a homegrown leader take the helm.”

Heath joined BCoT in 1997 in corporate services before she qualified as a teacher in 2001. She worked in multiple teaching and curriculum roles before taking responsibility for apprenticeships and employer engagement in 2011.

A BCoT spokesperson said that as deputy principal for business, Heath was “instrumental in expanding the range of apprenticeships offered at the college and has overseen significant growth in the number of learners and employers engaging in apprenticeship programmes”.

More recently, as deputy for curriculum, performance, and innovation – and with five years of experience as an Ofsted inspector – Heath has “proven she possesses the national expertise and local lens needed to lead BCoT”.

Heath said: “I am delighted to be named principal of BCoT, a place that has been my home for nearly three decades. I’ve seen the College grow and change over the years, serving thousands of young people from our community.

“I look forward to continuing that positive momentum and delivering high-quality education opportunities that directly equip our students with the specific skills our local economy and community need to thrive.”

BCoT was judged ‘good’ by Ofsted in 2023. The college employs around 430 people and teaches almost 5,000 students, according to its latest financial statements for 2024-25 which show ‘outstanding’ financial health.

Over 100 providers approved for LLE modular courses

The first colleges and universities to deliver short higher education courses through the lifelong learning entitlement have been revealed.

From January 2027, eligible adults will be able to access student loans to study “modules” instead of three-year-long qualifications, drawing down a maximum £39,160 of their lifelong learning entitlement (LLE).

The Department for Education (DfE) today confirmed the list of 130 providers registered with the Office for Students (OfS) that can deliver modules of courses in the government’s priority skills areas, such as economics, computing and engineering, at levels 4 to 6.

It comes as a recent interim report on the “modular acceleration programme” raised concerns around student understanding of the short courses and difficulty engaging employers.

The LLE will be available for modules in any subject from a higher technical qualifications (HTQ) and 10 approved subjects for level 4, 5 and 6 modules from full-level 6 “parent” qualifications.

These approved subject areas are computing, engineering, architecture, building and planning (excluding landscape gardening), physics and astronomy, mathematical sciences, nursing and midwifery, allied health, chemistry, economics and health and social care.

Eligible students will also be able to apply for maintenance support to help with living costs, with funding provided in smaller amounts linked to the size of the course being studied.

People who already hold a degree may still access the new funding if they have remaining entitlement available or want to retrain in the above priority subject areas.

DfE opened an expression of interest process between July and October 2025, confirming providers can follow two routes of funding approval based on their teaching excellence framework (TEF) status or Ofsted ratings.

See the table at the end of the story for the full list of providers.

Those with gold or silver TEF ratings and/or high Ofsted grades would be eligible for a “simpler and quicker” approval process.

Route two was reserved for providers with lower TEF and/or Ofsted ratings were required to submit more information that demonstrates evidence of high-quality outcomes and established course delivery.

Two colleges and one university received funding approval through the alternative entry mechanism to run the following computing, mathematical sciences and engineering courses.

Skills minister Jacqui Smith said the modules would open up new opportunities for adults balancing work and family commitments.

“Whether it’s fitting study around a job, retraining for a completely new career, juggling childcare, or getting qualifications later in life, the new lifelong learning entitlement will open up new opportunities for thousands more people,” she added.

The announcement comes after two government-backed precursors to the full LLE roll failed to deliver results demonstrating demand for short courses.

The first trial back in 2022-23 hit a “shocking” 5 per cent of its student enrolment target.

The second more recent trial, which cost £5 million, fared marginally better and reached a fifth of its recruitment goal.

Here’s the full list of delivery providers below:

£184m to beat population bulge in devolved areas

Post-16 capacity capital funding allocations of up to £22 million for 19 devolved areas have been revealed as a “demographic bulge” works through the education system.

An announcement confirmed that in February, eight combined authorities received a total of £87 million for projects to “provide additional capacity” for learning.

It added that this “spring”, a further £97 million will be paid to another 11 combined authorities and local authorities with devolution deals.

The funding seeks to address capacity constraints due to an expected 67,000 extra 16 and 17-year-olds in education by 2028.

A Department for Education spokesperson said: “A demographic bulge is currently working its way through the education system. In previous years it has impacted mostly schools, but it is now moving through post-16 education.”

Allocation levels have been decided using a formula based on local authority population projections that are weighted using local building cost data.

The largest allocations, of £22 million and £20 million, will go to East Midlands Combined County Authority and West Midlands Combined Authority respectively.

According to an accompanying memorandum of understanding template, devolved areas have been asked to agree that funding will be for additional capacity at providers lacking existing suitable space.

It should also be spent in the “most efficient and sustainable way possible”.

Any unspent funds must be immediately repaid to the government if requested.

Capital capacity cash

The national funding allocations mark a shift in control of post-16 capital funding from central government to mayors and local leaders, following the one-off award of £20 million to Greater Manchester Combined Authority and Leeds City Council last year.

The £184 million in post-16 capacity funding for devolved areas is part of a total of £570 million for further education providers in England in the 2025-30 period.

A further £99 million in capital will be handed to 13 devolved areas for construction skills capacity.

Although it is unclear how construction skills capacity funding will be allocated to all 13 areas, combined authorities such as South Yorkshire recently confirmed it will receive about £12 million.

Last month, the Greater London Authority also confirmed it has up to £20 million available, with half set aside to help meet the objectives of the construction technical excellence college programme and half for “project-based capital” to meet employers’ specific training needs.

For providers in non-devolved areas, £287 million will be awarded by the DfE through a national bidding round that closed last month.

This will be split into £191 million for post-16 capacity and £96 million for construction skills capacity.

According to DfE guidance, providers in non-devolved areas receiving construction skills capacity funding must be either a construction technical excellence college or committed to working with one as a “spoke”.

The previous government’s capital capacity funding was released between 2021 and 2023.

Around £230 million was shared between 89 colleges and sixth forms with the aim of creating additional capacity by September 2024.

Congrats

Court action preceded Tees Valley’s skills delay

A mayoral authority has indefinitely paused a £21 million adult education procurement after a training provider hit it with legal action.

Tees Valley Combined Authority (TVCA) began a fresh tender for adult skills funding in January – with contracts set to begin this August and run for three years.

But on April 15 officials took the unusual step of “temporarily” pausing the procurement without explanation.

The north-east authority’s procurement team told providers involved in the bidding stage of the process that a new timeline would be provided “in due course”.

FE Week has now learned that Learning Curve Group and two of the company’s subsidiaries filed a legal claim against the combined authority at the Technology and Construction Court, which handles public procurement disputes, on April 13 – two days before the delay announcement.

A spokesperson for TVCA said the authority was unable to comment due to the live procurement process. They did not respond when asked for a second time whether the procurement process was delayed due to the legal action.

Learning Curve Group, which is understood to have submitted a stage-one bid for a Tees Valley adult education contract, also said it would be inappropriate to comment.

The action comes a year after Learning Curve, based in County Durham, reached a secret financial settlement with the Department for Education following a legal dispute over losing out on a national adult education budget contract in 2023.

Negotiations

Tees Valley’s £21 million tender will cover at least three years from 2026-27, with an option to extend for a further year.

According to documents published by TVCA, the procurement process is being conducted through a “competitive flexible procedure” in three stages.

Stage one focuses on whether providers meet compliance requirements, while stage two will assess the quality of detailed tender submissions.

Stage three will involve face-to-face negotiations over costs and delivery plans.

The stage two clarification deadline, which came shortly after providers’ tenders were submitted, was planned for March 20. But on March 30 the combined authority said the submission deadline was “extended” until April 9.

After pausing the whole procurement on April 15, an update was issued on April 29 where the authority said a new deadline would be communicated to bidders “in due course”. Contract winners were due to be announced on June 10.

Grant funding returns

The combined authority last procured its adult skills contracts in 2021, for a period of three years with an extension up to July 2025.

Winners of the 2021 procurement included Learning Curve, Realise Learning & Employment Limited, Think Employment and Back 2 Work Complete Training.

Tees Valley, run by Conservative mayor Ben Houchen, is thought to be the only combined authority to have forced FE colleges and local authorities to bid for adult education funding alongside independent training providers, rather than offering them grants.

TVCA further extended the contracts won under the previous procurement for a one-year “call off” period in 2025-26, hoping to receive a more flexible multi-year “single pot” budget from the government, known as an integrated settlement.

However, the government refused to agree to single pot funding due to an ongoing “best-value notice” placed on the authority over governance concerns.

The notice, which remains in place, relates to an investigation into concerns about “corruption, wrongdoing and illegality” around its management of a large brownfield site.

TVCA has now decided to revert to the standard adult skills fund (ASF) allocations process of grant funding colleges and local authorities, while only running a tender for independent training providers.

For the next academic year, TVCA has a £30.5 million ASF budget and £2.7 million in free courses for jobs funding.

The £7 million-per-year in contracts for independent training providers would account for about one third of the combined authority’s adult skills funding.

Prosperity fund axe puts apprenticeship hubs in danger

Fears are growing for apprenticeship ‘hubs’ after ministers slashed a key post-Brexit funding stream, triggering warnings of closures and lost brokerage support for small businesses and young people.

The government scrapped the UK Shared Prosperity Fund (UKSPF) in March, a programme created by the Conservatives following the loss of about £1.5 billion per year in European Union social and regional development funding.

In a joint open letter to work and pensions secretary Pat McFadden this week, several sector bodies warned the cuts would threaten England’s network of ‘apprenticeship hubs’, partially funded by the UKSPF, that aim to boost recruitment, particularly among SMEs.

They wrote: “Without mitigating action, the loss of this funding stream will result in local brokerage services being scaled back or closed entirely, a loss of service that cannot easily be reversed because of the contacts and trusted relationships they have built up.”

The signatories – including Engineering UK, Logistics UK, Edge Foundation and Skills Federation – call for a “sustainable funding stream” for the estimated 27 apprenticeship hubs that exist across England.

The hubs most at threat are those outside mayoral areas that stand to be left out of a £140 million apprenticeship brokerage pilot to be funded through the government’s apprenticeship budget.

This appears to be the first time that apprenticeship levy funds have been used to fund initiatives outside of training and incentives.

Double whammy cold spots

The UKSPF’s partial replacement, the Local Growth Fund, could help keep apprenticeship hubs open but will only be targeted at 11 mayoral strategic authorities in the North and Midlands which have the “highest productivity catch-up and agglomeration potential”.

This excludes local authorities, often rural counties and smaller cities, facing “unprecedented risk” to their apprenticeship hubs and employment support.

English cold spots lacking both Local Growth Fund and apprenticeship brokerage pilot funding include counties in south west and central England, county councils in the West Midlands, and Cumbria and Lancashire in the North West.

Several areas have voiced concerns about the impact this will have on flexible employment support offered by councils, small charities and training providers.

Although details have been limited since its announcement five months ago, the government’s apprenticeship brokerage pilot is expected to offer help and opportunities to potential apprentices, including candidates who missed out on their first-choice applications.

This is similar to the offer provided by some of the apprenticeship hubs currently under threat.

Brokerages ‘already exist’

According to the Edge Foundation, the hubs offer brokerage support such as promoting the apprenticeship training route to young people and SMEs, connecting employers with training providers, and helping with recruitment and bureaucracy.

The letter’s authors urged McFadden to match the ambition of his apprenticeship brokerage pilot with support for the “many pockets of great practice” that already exist.

Norfolk County Council argued that its hub, Apprenticeships Norfolk, had helped grow apprenticeships year on year, including by 18 per cent in 2021-22, which was more than double the 8 per cent national rate.

Apprenticeships Norfolk also runs a levy transfer scheme that has moved over £4.5 million in just over two financial years to around 220 businesses, supporting 440 apprentices, and provides financial incentives for hiring.

A variety of hubs with various brand names have sprung up across England since the late 2010s, set up by local enterprise partnerships, local authorities and training provider networks using a combination of funding that often included UKSPF and EU development funding.

While some are run by combined authorities such as in the North East, Liverpool City Region and West Midlands, others are run by councils and training provider networks such as the Western Training Provider Network.

Local employment services hit

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, which is responsible for UKSPF, did not assess the impact of it being scrapped, arguing it was always a “time-limited” programme.

Jude Day, employability programme manager at the Sussex Community Development Association, said the cuts had resulted in its employment-focused staff body being halved to 13 this year, with further potential redundancies to come.

The association works with people “furthest from the job market” across East Sussex, helping them into work, volunteering, education and training programmes.

Day said that at its peak it employed about 40 people via DWP, EU and UKSPF programmes.

She told FE Week it takes years to build employment advisors’ knowledge of local businesses and how to work with economically inactive and unemployed people.

“These skills are being lost at the very time it is getting harder to find work, use AI appropriately, to attend interviews and secure the job,” she added.

Lancashire Combined County Authority, which had a £22 million UKSPF allocation last year, has warned the loss of funding creates “unprecedented risk” for local authorities, training providers and local charities.

A report by the authority noted that £3.5 million is spent on local people and skills projects, and that national programmes offering employment support fail to offer the “breadth or the locality” of UKSPF-funded provision.

It added that the “long-term sustainability” of local voluntary and social enterprise organisations may make continued delivery of skills projects “unviable”.

UKSPF history

Covering an initial three years, the UKSPF was devised by the Conservative government under Boris Johnson, who pledged in his 2019 manifesto that post-Brexit funding would “at a minimum” match the size of EU funding, which was distributed in seven-year cycles.

However, its delivery was plagued by delays, tight spending timelines and complex rules.

It was replaced with the £225 million-per-year Local Growth Fund which was worth 75 per cent less than the UKSPF in 2024-25 and, as the government confirmed in the autumn budget, will only go to 11 devolved mayoral strategic authorities in the North and Midlands.

It meant that as of April this year, more than 150 local authorities have lost annual allocations of between £327,000 and £61 million, depending on their size and deprivation levels.

A government spokesperson said: “Our growth and skills L=levy reforms, backed by £1 billion additional investment, will support 50,000 more young people into apprenticeships over the next three years, giving them a vital route into skilled work.

“This funding includes £140 million to explore how mayoral strategic authorities can best use their expert local knowledge and expertise to connect more young people with local apprenticeship opportunities.

“We are taking significant steps to transform how local growth is funded, which is an important part of our long-term goal. This is alongside making local government finance more sustainable and allowing funding to be targeted where it is needed most.”

Colleges delivered AoC recommendation-busting pay deals

College teachers received pay rises averaging 4.1 per cent last year – far higher than the Association of Colleges’ pay recommendation.

Analysis of new 2024-25 FE workforce data shows full-time equivalent general FE college teachers were paid a median of £37,600 – up from £36,100 the year before.

The AoC made a 2.5 per cent non-binding pay recommendation to college bosses.

Pay rises were even higher among support staff (5.4 per cent) and admin staff (5.3 per cent) within FE colleges. In contrast, college leaders received a 2.1 per cent boost to their median pay.

However, teacher pay did not meet the college membership body’s 6.5 per cent recommendation the year before, with the median teacher salary rising 5.9 per cent in 2023-24.

Sixth form college teachers remained the highest earners with a median salary of £49,700 last year following a 5.5 per cent rise.

FE college teachers continued to out-earn teachers at independent training providers, who received £32,000 in median pay in 2024-25, up 2.6 per cent from the previous year.

Colleges’ pay rises last year likely stem from the Department for Education’s £50 million “one-off grant” to support the 2024-25 salary increase.

University and College Union general secretary Jo Grady said: “Due to the University and College Union applying years of sustained industrial pressure to college bosses, staff have seen a small improvement to their pay.

“Unfortunately, it is nowhere near enough, and colleges will continue shedding staff to secondary schools while the pay gap continues to widen.

“We need a new deal for further education, increased government funding and real-terms pay rises.”

AoC’s chief executive David Hughes said he was “pleased but unsurprised” that colleges were prioritising staff investment.

Despite this good news, pay still isn’t where we need it to be, so we highlighted this in our recent letter, signed by 175 college leaders, to the prime minister. In that letter one of our three asks was for ministers to sit down with us and the unions to agree a five-year pay plan to close the unjust pay gap with schools and industry.

“This would allow colleges to retrain and reward staff fairly and enable them to deliver high-quality learning to more people in key industrial priority sectors.”

Teacher ups and downs

DfE data shows the size of the FE workforce grew 2.3 per cent to over 200,000 staff, but growth was largely confined to general FE colleges.

Staff headcount in FE colleges inched up 2.5 per cent to 128,816 workers in 2024-25.

Meanwhile, sixth form colleges’ staff headcount fell by almost one in 10, to about 9,400 workers. The sharpest fall was among managers, whose numbers dropped by more than a fifth.

Meanwhile, headcount among ITPs fell by more than one tenth.

ITPs are the second largest employer in the FE sector, but headcount has dropped 15 per cent in four years to 35,907. However, the DfE said ITP estimates are scaled because ITPs are non-statutory and have lower return rates, so they are less reliable than GFEC/sixth form figures.

Simon Ashworth, deputy CEO and director of policy at the Association of Employment and Learning Providers, said the figures reflected the “growing financial pressures” facing many ITPs, particularly those heavily reliant on apprenticeship delivery.

He said: “While there have been annual uplifts in 16-to-19 funding, apprenticeship funding bands have historically been reviewed far less regularly, with many bands remaining unchanged for long periods.

“In some cases, funding bands are already operating close to the upper funding limit, further constraining providers’ ability to absorb rising staffing and delivery costs.”

Pay differs across subjects and regions

Most FE teaching staff taught vocational subjects and drew the lowest salaries.

A quarter of FE staff taught academic subjects and were the highest paid.

Philosophy teachers came top with an average salary of £45,576 last year, whereas the lowest paid were retail and commercial enterprise teachers and animal care teachers, on £31,361 and £32,211 respectively.

General FE colleges had the smallest pay differences across England. Full-time equivalent teaching staff in Yorkshire and the Humber were paid a median annual salary of £35,500, one fifth lower than the £42,900 paid to a London equivalent teacher.

Meanwhile, teachers in local authority-run education providers in the East Midlands were paid half as much as their London equivalents, £27,600 compared to £56,200 respectively.

Construction and SEND vacancies

For the first time the DfE published its own retention metrics measuring the percentage of staff that remained in the FE sector from one academic year to the next.

The data only covered colleges but revealed around 85 per cent of teaching staff stayed in the sector in the last academic year.

Analysis also found retention was highest for managers and leaders, and lowest for admin staff.

Meanwhile, teaching vacancies had declined to 3.5 per cent, down from 3.9 per cent.

Vacancies for SEND teachers specialising in speech and communication were the highest at 9.3 per cent. Sensory and supported learning for SEND learner roles were also at least 5 per cent unfilled.

Construction teaching positions had the second highest vacancy level, with 7.3 per cent of posts vacant by the end of the academic year.

Zero-hour contracts

In 2024-25, two-thirds of the workforce (67.4 per cent) who had permanent or fixed-term contracts worked full time, similar to last year (67.7 per cent).

Two-thirds of teaching staff also worked full-time, which was similar to the previous year.

Eight in 10 FE college teachers are now on permanent contracts, compared with 91 per cent of sixth form teachers and 90 per cent of ITP teachers.

FE colleges remain the biggest users of zero-hours contracts among teaching staff. In 2024-25, 10.4 per cent of teachers were on zero-hours contracts, compared with 2.4 per cent in sixth form colleges and 2.6 per cent at ITPs.

Governor long-service drop

Former FE commissioner Shelagh Legrave previously warned that governors should not be serving more than two terms, a maximum of eight years.

The data shows the proportion of governors serving between nine to 12 years has fallen over the last four years. After a peak in 2022-23 of nearly 7 per cent of governors in this bracket, the proportion dropped to 4.6 per cent last year.

The proportion of those who have served over 12 years in a role has also dropped from 5 per cent to 3.3 per cent over the last four years.

Overall, there were 100 fewer governors serving in FE colleges and sixth form colleges last year, down to an estimated 3,600.

Additionally, sixth form colleges recorded more unfilled governor vacancies than FE colleges.

Sixth form colleges had a 9 per cent empty seat rate across their governing boards, which has been rising over the last 4 years. FE colleges had 6 per cent vacancy rate, which has more or less stayed the same.

Diversity improvement

Ethnicity data showed a growing population of ethnic minority workers in FE.

Last year, a total of 23.7 per cent identified themselves as from an ethnic minority group, up from 21.9 per cent the year before.

Leadership has marginally improved its ethnic minority representation. Asian leaders made up 4.1 per cent of the cohort, while Black leaders accounted for 2 per cent of the workforce.

Ethnic representation amongst governing boards has also increased. Nearly one-fifth (19.8 per cent) of college governors were from an ethnic minority group, up from 17.5 per cent in 2021-22.

Some 7.8 per cent of governors identified as Asian or Asian British, 4.3 per cent as white minorities, and 4.2 per cent as Black or Black British.

Regarding gender, three out of every five (58.8 per cent) further education teachers are female.

The proportion of female leaders in FE colleges remained the same last year (54.9 per cent), but increased two percentage points at sixth form colleges to 53 per cent.