Confusion and heavy lobbying forces Ofsted to ‘clarify’ Baker clause approach

ofsted

Ofsted inspectors will “always” report where a school fails to comply with the Baker clause and “consider” how it affects their grade, the watchdog has clarified following mounting pressure.

Yesterday, the Commons Education Select Committee recommended schools be limited to ‘requires improvement’ if they are not allowing training providers to access their pupils, as mandated by the clause.

Ofsted bosses have also provoked confusion by contradicting one another on whether inspection grades should be limited if a school is failing to meet its obligations under the clause.

Following the report’s publication, an Ofsted spokesperson told FE Week: “We’ll soon be updating our handbooks to clarify inspectors will always report where schools fall short of the requirements of the Baker Clause, as well as considering how it affects a school’s grade.”

 

Ofsted: ‘Good quality’ careers advice is ‘really important’

The Baker clause, named after its author former education secretary Kenneth Baker, was passed into law in 2018.

Ofsted is planning to carry out a thematic review of careers advice in schools, under orders from the Department for Education.

The watchdog’s spokesperson stated that “good quality” careers advice is “really important,” and the clause already forms part of the “personal development” grade in an Ofsted report.

Inspectors are also trained to understand the clause’s requirements and how to look for them, while most reports include a mention of careers education “even if they don’t specifically report on compliance with the clause,” the spokesperson said.

 

Watchdog had caused confusion over grading

This clarification came after Ofsted chief inspector Amanda Spielman told the select committee it would be “unlikely” a school could be graded ‘outstanding’ if it was found to be non-compliant with the clause.

Baker
Amanda Spielman addressing the Education Select Committee

This contradicted the watchdog’s deputy director of FE and skills Paul Joyce, who told the Association of Employment and Learning Providers national conference earlier this month compliance with the clause should not be a “determining factor” of an inspection grade.

The select committee’s report, mainly into the education disadvantages of white working-class boys, found that “for too long” schools have “failed to fully deliver” on the Baker Clause.

So, if Ofsted find a school is not complying, MPs do not want it to get an inspection grade any higher than ‘requires improvement’.

 

Baker believes non-compliant schools should be cut off from ‘outstanding’

The inspectorate has also been coming under pressure from other government bodies which have expressed concern over schools’ low regard for the clause.

UCAS reported last month one-third of students are not told about apprenticeships, while chief executive of the Careers and Enterprise Company Oli de Botton told the AELP conference it was “true historically that there hasn’t been enough access for ITPs or enough information about apprenticeships and technical routes for young people”.

Baker, now a member of the House of Lords, is also seeking to amend the Skills and Post-16 Education Bill currently going through parliament to make his clause a statutory duty.

This would mean stakeholders such as parents or providers could take schools to court over non-compliance with the clause.

Speaking about what Ofsted could do about non-compliance, Baker told FE Week: “If the school is not actually implementing the clause, and if they’re likely to be ‘outstanding’, they shouldn’t be given ‘outstanding’.”

Latest education roles from

Student Engagement and Enrichment Lead

Student Engagement and Enrichment Lead

Bournemouth and Poole College

Tutorial Learning Mentor

Tutorial Learning Mentor

Barnsley College

School Liaison Admissions Tutor

School Liaison Admissions Tutor

Riverside College

Study Coach

Study Coach

Heart of Yorkshire Education Group

Lecturer in Maths

Lecturer in Maths

Heart of Yorkshire Education Group

Apprentice Development Leader

Apprentice Development Leader

GP Strategies

Sponsored posts

Sponsored post

Why we’re backing our UK skills ‘Olympians’ (and why you should too)

This August, teams from over 200 nations will gather to compete in the sticky heat of the Paris summer...

Advertorial
Sponsored post

Is your organisation prepared for a major incident?

We live in an unpredictable world where an unforeseen incident or environmental event could disrupt a Further Education (FE)...

Advertorial
Sponsored post

A new chapter in education protection!

Gallagher is a specialist in the Further Education sector, working with over 75% of Further Education colleges in the...

Advertorial
Sponsored post

Pearson is planting the seed for sustainability talent with new HTQ

Sustainability is rapidly becoming a key organisational goal for many businesses looking to make a difference in society, the...

Advertorial

More from this theme

Ofsted

BCTG bounces back from damning Ofsted judgment 

Birmingham provider aims to 'rise from the ashes' with more contracts following 'dark period'

Billy Camden
Colleges, Ofsted

Second ‘outstanding’ for Cheshire college

Inspectors said teachers and leaders were “passionate” about providing life-changing opportunities for young people and adults

Josh Mellor
Ofsted, SEND

Specialist arts college strikes the right chord with Ofsted ‘outstanding’

Inspectors said the college empowers young adults with special needs to progress into the world of work

Josh Mellor
Ofsted

Big Listen: Ofsted must enforce ‘humane accountability’, say leaders

The way Ofsted delivers its judgements remains a key concern for the sector

Josh Mellor

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One comment

  1. Gaynor

    this is still not specificd enough. We are an ITP with a ‘super school’ nearby. They get around the Baker Clause by inviting us in to host a table over lunch hours. We have found this to be a complete waste of time, 14-16 year old learners do not want to give up their lunch times, regardless of information available. They cannot understand why they cannot be given this information during their lesson time.