What the Supreme Court ruling on ‘sex’ means for FE colleges

The court’s decision sharpens the focus on a complex legal landscape. With revised guidance pending, colleges must navigate carefully

The court’s decision sharpens the focus on a complex legal landscape. With revised guidance pending, colleges must navigate carefully

25 Apr 2025, 5:48

The Supreme Court ruling on the legal interpretation of “sex” in the Equality Act 2010 will have implications across public life, including in relation to FE colleges.  The narrow point which the court decided was whether the appointment of a trans woman who has a gender recognition certificate (GRC) counts as the appointment of a woman for the goal that boards of certain Scottish public authorities are to have 50 per cent non-executive members who are women. In the court’s judgment, it does not and therefore the Scottish government’s guidance on that point was incorrect. 

The judgment is of particular relevance to individuals with GRCs, which are not available to those under 18 years old. But it also brings the long-standing issues relating to students or staff who are transgender or questioning their gender identity into sharp focus.

College guidance gaps

There is a current gap in terms of clear and comprehensive guidance on this topic for colleges.  The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has published codes of practice including those for services, public functions and associations (currently under review) which contain guidance relevant to colleges.

But the only publication with a college-specific focus is the draft non-statutory guidance on gender questioning children for schools and colleges in England, published in December 2023.  This consultation document issued by the previous government attracted a significant response but was never finalised. 

Protections for trans people continue

The draft guidance dealt with practical issues such as name changes, use of pronouns, single sex spaces and sport.  Whilst the draft guidance was in line with the recent court judgment insofar as it stated that legal duties regarding sex should be framed around biological sex, neither the guidance nor the judgment fully considers the complex legal issues colleges are regularly dealing with when balancing safeguarding, data rights, regulatory and Equality Act duties for students with different protected characteristics.

The April 2024 Cass Review highlighted issues related to young people socially transitioning which are relevant to colleges, but did not offer specific guidance to the sector.  Following the recent judgment, the EHRC confirmed that the code of practice will be revised.  It is hoped that the revised code and finalising the gender questioning children guidance will be considered by DfE and/or EHRC in the coming months.

It is important to note that there continues to be significant protections for trans people under the Equality Act, relevant to students, staff and the wider college community.

The Supreme Court’s decision does not change the fact that gender reassignment is a protected characteristic and emphasised that trans people have exactly the same level of protection in the Equality Act against discrimination, harassment and victimisation as other groups. The judgment is not a rollback of rights on the scale that some have suggested.

Emotive issue

For colleges as employers, there may be some immediate impact; staff with a GRC will no longer be able to make an equal pay claim based on the gender stated on their GRC (they may still do so on the basis of biological sex).

In terms of the practical day-to-day management of trans employees, little has changed. As things stand, we would urge caution before making significant changes to staff policies or practices. 

Colleges know that this is a very emotive issue for both trans people and those who hold gender critical beliefs, which also have the potential of being protected beliefs under the Equality Act.  It may be sensible to consider if any support or clarifications should be offered to affected individuals.

Pending further guidance from the DfE or EHRC, it is important for colleges to continue to proceed with caution in dealing with the complex and sensitive issues which arise. Look carefully at the circumstances, taking all relevant legal and practical considerations into account.  Be cautious about taking a blanket approach and, where necessary, take legal advice. 

Latest education roles from

Deputy Director of Apprenticeships

Deputy Director of Apprenticeships

Manchester Metropolitan University

Independent Non- Executive Director (INED)

Independent Non- Executive Director (INED)

League Football Education

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Executive Officer

Wigston Academies Trust

Initial Teacher Training Programme Lead

Initial Teacher Training Programme Lead

Scarborough Sixth Form College

Sponsored posts

Sponsored post

Supporting the UK’s Transport Decarbonisation Plan Through Skills

The UK Government’s Decarbonising Transport: A Better, Greener Britain strategy sets a legally binding path towards a net-zero transport...

Advertorial
Sponsored post

Project power: ASDAN expands its qualifications portfolio

From 2026, ASDAN’s planned Foundation and Higher Project Qualifications will sit alongside its Extended Project Qualification[CM1] , creating a complete...

Advertorial
ATAs

Spotlight on excellence: Nominations now open for the Apprenticeship & Training Awards 2026

Nominations are open for the 2026 Apprenticeship & Training Awards, celebrating outstanding employers and providers with national recognition, a...

FE Week Reporter
Sponsored post

Funding Adult Green Skills

New sources of funding are available to finance the delivery of green skills to all learners. Government policy is...

Tyler Palmer

More from this theme

Colleges

Governors Havant a clue about college’s finances going South

FE Commissioner reveals financial crisis at Hampshire college came 'out of the blue' for board members

Billy Camden
Colleges

Principals scratch their heads over new improvement teams

FE leaders warn Labour’s regional improvement teams risk duplicating oversight already performed by the FE Commissioner

Josh Mellor
Colleges

Weston freed of ‘traumatic’ NTI – but finance probe continues

College out of intervention after strengthening governance procedures

Anviksha Patel
Colleges, Skills reform

Skills England urged to confront government on FE funding

Joint AoC and UUK report also calls for 'excessive' competition to be challenged

Josh Mellor

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One comment

  1. Steve Hewitt

    Ah yes, terribly important to consider the “feelings” of bigots… The Forstater case was an absolute mess and, rather than showing bigoted “beliefs” should be protected, really showed that having proper, clear, enforced HR policies was crucial to deal with one staff member being awful (which is what her employer had failed to do).

    The whole sector should stand up straight and say with one voice “no discrimination here”. You only have to look at the absolute nonsense about toilets being promoted by right wing, US-Christian backed hate groups to see that this isn’t even the thin edge of the wedge any more, we’re some distance down the wedge!!!

    Having pronouns in your email signature IS NOT ENOUGH, we need to be fighting to secure a safe, caring environment for everyone, staff and student alike.