What the Supreme Court ruling on ‘sex’ means for FE colleges

The court’s decision sharpens the focus on a complex legal landscape. With revised guidance pending, colleges must navigate carefully

The court’s decision sharpens the focus on a complex legal landscape. With revised guidance pending, colleges must navigate carefully

25 Apr 2025, 5:48

The Supreme Court ruling on the legal interpretation of “sex” in the Equality Act 2010 will have implications across public life, including in relation to FE colleges.  The narrow point which the court decided was whether the appointment of a trans woman who has a gender recognition certificate (GRC) counts as the appointment of a woman for the goal that boards of certain Scottish public authorities are to have 50 per cent non-executive members who are women. In the court’s judgment, it does not and therefore the Scottish government’s guidance on that point was incorrect. 

The judgment is of particular relevance to individuals with GRCs, which are not available to those under 18 years old. But it also brings the long-standing issues relating to students or staff who are transgender or questioning their gender identity into sharp focus.

College guidance gaps

There is a current gap in terms of clear and comprehensive guidance on this topic for colleges.  The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has published codes of practice including those for services, public functions and associations (currently under review) which contain guidance relevant to colleges.

But the only publication with a college-specific focus is the draft non-statutory guidance on gender questioning children for schools and colleges in England, published in December 2023.  This consultation document issued by the previous government attracted a significant response but was never finalised. 

Protections for trans people continue

The draft guidance dealt with practical issues such as name changes, use of pronouns, single sex spaces and sport.  Whilst the draft guidance was in line with the recent court judgment insofar as it stated that legal duties regarding sex should be framed around biological sex, neither the guidance nor the judgment fully considers the complex legal issues colleges are regularly dealing with when balancing safeguarding, data rights, regulatory and Equality Act duties for students with different protected characteristics.

The April 2024 Cass Review highlighted issues related to young people socially transitioning which are relevant to colleges, but did not offer specific guidance to the sector.  Following the recent judgment, the EHRC confirmed that the code of practice will be revised.  It is hoped that the revised code and finalising the gender questioning children guidance will be considered by DfE and/or EHRC in the coming months.

It is important to note that there continues to be significant protections for trans people under the Equality Act, relevant to students, staff and the wider college community.

The Supreme Court’s decision does not change the fact that gender reassignment is a protected characteristic and emphasised that trans people have exactly the same level of protection in the Equality Act against discrimination, harassment and victimisation as other groups. The judgment is not a rollback of rights on the scale that some have suggested.

Emotive issue

For colleges as employers, there may be some immediate impact; staff with a GRC will no longer be able to make an equal pay claim based on the gender stated on their GRC (they may still do so on the basis of biological sex).

In terms of the practical day-to-day management of trans employees, little has changed. As things stand, we would urge caution before making significant changes to staff policies or practices. 

Colleges know that this is a very emotive issue for both trans people and those who hold gender critical beliefs, which also have the potential of being protected beliefs under the Equality Act.  It may be sensible to consider if any support or clarifications should be offered to affected individuals.

Pending further guidance from the DfE or EHRC, it is important for colleges to continue to proceed with caution in dealing with the complex and sensitive issues which arise. Look carefully at the circumstances, taking all relevant legal and practical considerations into account.  Be cautious about taking a blanket approach and, where necessary, take legal advice. 

Latest education roles from

Principal & Chief Executive – Bath College

Principal & Chief Executive – Bath College

Dodd Partners

IT Technician

IT Technician

Harris Academy Morden

Teacher of Geography

Teacher of Geography

Harris Academy Orpington

Lecturer/Assessor in Electrical

Lecturer/Assessor in Electrical

South Gloucestershire and Stroud College

Director of Management Information Systems (MIS)

Director of Management Information Systems (MIS)

South Gloucestershire and Stroud College

Exams Assistant

Exams Assistant

Richmond and Hillcroft Adult & Community College

Sponsored posts

Sponsored post

Skills Bootcamps Are Changing – What FE Colleges Must Know 

Skills Bootcamps are evolving as funding moves to local control and digital skills trends shift. Code Institute, an Ofsted...

Code Institute
Sponsored post

Building Strong Leadership for Effective T Level Implementation

Are you struggling with T Level curriculum and implementation, or building strong employer relationships? Do you want to develop...

Advertorial
Sponsored post

Derby College Group DIRT and TOES: A Story of Enhanced Learning and Reduced Workload

"Feedback is one of the most powerful influences on learning and achievement" - Hattie and Timperley 2007. This powerful...

Advertorial
Sponsored post

Keeping it real – enriching T Level teaching with Industry Insights

T Level teachers across all subjects are getting invaluable support from the Education and Training Foundation’s (ETF) Industry Insights...

Advertorial

More from this theme

Colleges, FE Commissioner

Weston chair felt powerless over £2.5m payments to former principal

Ex-Weston college chair gives tell-all interview following FE Commissioner probe

Anviksha Patel
Colleges, Ofsted

Shrewsbury College celebrates ‘outstanding’ Ofsted result

Landmark inspection outcome achieved just 5 years after the sixth form group controversially received the lowest possible grade

FE Week Reporter
Colleges

Unions demand 10% pay rise amid looming strike threat

This year’s AoC negotiations will also include measures to tackle “impossible” workloads

Josh Mellor
Colleges

Weston College governance failure allowed ‘concealment’ of £2.5m payments to former principal

Paul Phillips was paid £1.8m in 2023, including a ‘significant’ six-figure retention payment which his COO son ‘resisted’ paying...

Anviksha Patel

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *