Popular level 3 qualifications including 44 BTECs that were facing the scrap heap have been given a stay of execution.
Ministers will allow 70 per cent of the courses earmarked for defunding to continue up to 2027, a departure from the previous government, which wanted to clear the decks and axe qualifications that could rival T Levels from this year.
In its outcome for a much-anticipated “short review” of level 3 qualifications, the government confirmed 157 qualifications that were up for the chop will be retained for a time.
There are 57 qualifications in digital, construction and health and science that will now be funded until July 2026.
A further 100 qualifications in engineering, agriculture, business and creative will retain their funding until July 2027.
But plans to defund 94 courses that were due to be lost this year and next will still go ahead.
The amnesty includes many popular applied general qualifications, such as BTECs as well as other level 3 certificates and diplomas. Download the full list here.
In addition, previously proposed funding rules limiting how schools and colleges can combine qualifications and piece together study programmes have been dropped.
Skills minister Jacqui Smith said: “This government is committed to the long-term delivery of T Levels as the best quality technical education option for young people.
“Qualifications are not one-size-fits-all, and we recognise we must take a pragmatic approach. Our ambitious programme must meet the needs of employers and our public services if we are to see our economy flourish.
“We took decisive action as soon as we came into government to ensure the best outcomes for learners and I am thankful to all those who contributed to the pause and review.”
Colleges and schools have been unable to tell prospective students what level 3 courses will be available in September 2025 until now.
It confirms a shift, first revealed by skills minister Jacqui Smith writing for FE Week, that courses overlapping T Levels will retain funding. The previous government insisted on removing funding from overlapping qualifications in the face of significant sector opposition.
Bill Watkin, chief executive of the Sixth Form Colleges Association, which leads the Protect Student Choice campaign, said: “We are pleased the campaign’s recommendation not to introduce constraints on combining different types and sizes of qualification will be implemented.”
He added that 13 of the 21 applied general qualifications (AGQs) that the campaign identified as “being essential to retain, will be retained”.
“That means students will continue to benefit from BTEC and other qualifications in key subjects such as applied science, health and social care, IT, and engineering. Although these 13 AGQs (that account for 58,000 16 to 18 enrolments) are only being retained for a further year, we understand that many have a long-term future alongside A-levels and T Levels.”
Watkin added: “More broadly, there is now a clear recognition from ministers that A-levels and T Levels cannot be the only level 3 options available to young people. Today has brought a degree of certainty to the level 3 reform process, and we look forward to working with the government on the implementation of the plans set out today.”
Limited certainty
While ministers claim today’s announcement provide principals and students with some certainty, that might be short-lived.
Shadow education minister Neil O’Brien said: “The sector will heave a sigh of relief that today’s announcement is finally out. But this announcement leaves some huge unanswered questions. The minister says that things will be clear until 2027, which means we’ll be back here again in two years time. We had a pause and a review, we’re now going to have a longer pause and another review. At some point the government will have to decide.”
David Hughes, chief executive of the Association of Colleges, said: “Today’s announcement on the outcome of the rapid review of level 3 qualification defunding offers some stability for colleges and students and allows colleges to plan their curriculum offer with confidence for the next couple of years.
“The decision to trust college staff to design learning programmes which combine qualifications, rather than setting rules centrally, signals a welcome shift towards trusting colleges to do the best for their students.”
great idea, AGI is less than 2 years away, autonomous robotics 4 or less years away and yet Skills England retains numerous Digital and Engineering courses that are now at least 10 years out of date, just unbelievable, 100% based on what the Colleges and Unions want, a disaster for Skills, the economy and the country, disgrace.
And time travel is less than 10 years away, which technically means it has already been here for, erm, some time!
I think it might be prudent to wait until AGI and autonomous robotics are mainstream and tested before scrapping educational programmes that fill the occupations you assume will soon be redundant once AGI has been achieved.
If I asked you for all your money now because you won’t need it in 5 years time, because I tell you money will be redundant because of AGI and autonomous robots, I reckon you’d ask me to stop wasting your, er, time.
Sad and even more worrying that there is a comment like this. For Digital and Engineering T Levels are the only modern course available in FE. BTECs are completely out of of date for these sectors, that is why they were all going to be cancelled.
As a business that uses AI and robotics, AI is here now it shapes all current hiring decisions and future plans for Big and SME Tech. Agentic AI is now here , open Chatgpt or Claude or a thousand other Apps. Robotics shall change everything soon about Engineering and this is already happening, listen to Elon Musk on this and many others.
These students shall be completely unprepared for the Digital and Engineering sectors they go into by doing these completely outdated qualifications. Also it is a disaster for the modern skills base in the UK.
It is really sad for the country this is the direction things are going in.
I’ll take that as a no.
Buddy, the day I listen to Elon Musk about *anything* is a bad day…