Ofsted slams major NHS trust for rapid apprenticeship recruitment

The trust made 'insufficient progress' in all three areas of a follow-up monitoring visit

The trust made 'insufficient progress' in all three areas of a follow-up monitoring visit


England’s “largest” NHS trust has been slapped down by Ofsted for taking on too many apprentices while failing to recruit enough tutors to train them properly. 

In a report published on Tuesday, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust was found to be making ‘insufficient progress’ in all three areas of a monitoring visit undertaken in July. 

Apprentices could not be supported effectively, Ofsted said

Inspectors slammed leaders at the employer, which has 386 apprentices, for a “failure to put in place many of the principles of an apprenticeship”. 

Despite this, “leaders continued to recruit large numbers of apprentices, even though they knew they would be unable to meet all the requirements of an apprenticeship”. 

At the same time, a “small number” of tutors were responsible for a “large number of apprentices”, so could not support all of them “effectively”. 


A large majority of apprentices study the level 2 healthcare support worker and level 3 senior healthcare support worker standards, but others studied the level 3 team leader and business administrator courses. 

Insisting the provider’s problems could not be blamed on the pandemic, the report highlights how “none of the areas for improvement identified at the previous inspection has been fully resolved”. 

The trust, which boasts on its website of being the largest in England, was given a grade three in a full inspection report published in February 2020. 

That report told trust bosses to “rapidly” reduce the number of apprentices “who leave before completing their apprenticeship or continue in learning beyond their planned end-date”. Also, they were advised to include employers more in the planning of apprentices’ learning and to ensure staff delivering functional skills courses use apprentices’ starting points to plan the curriculum. 

‘Too many apprentices fall behind in their learning’

This week’s follow-up monitoring report finds that when apprentices do not attend functional skills sessions, leaders did not intervene quickly enough. This meant “too many apprentices fall behind in their learning and routinely exceed their planned end-dates for functional skills”. 

Apprentices’ line managers “do not know” what they need to do to help apprentices apply skills and knowledge at work, because the provider’s assessors do not involve them in planning courses. 

Leaders were criticised for not ensuring assessors and tutors use apprentices’ starting points to plan and develop apprentices’ English and maths skills and put in place actions for apprentices to complete their functional skills courses in a timely manner. 

The provider has brought in new processes to improve the collection of apprentices’ starting points, including one-to-one meetings to determine what learners already know at the start of their programme, the report reads. 

Leaders and managers had not ensured apprentices receive high-quality careers information, advice and guidance, it was also found. 

“Most” apprentices told inspectors they have not had the chance to discuss progression opportunities, even though the large majority have “clear and aspirational career aims” to become nurses or operations department practitioners, working to prepare patients and operating theatres’ equipment for surgery. 

Under Ofsted’s inspection handbook, providers, like Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, that receive a ‘requires improvement’ judgment should expect a full reinspection within “12-30 months”. 

A spokesperson for Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust said: “We greatly value our apprenticeships and have worked hard to address the recommendations made by Ofsted.

“Initial progress in this area undoubtedly slowed at the height of the pandemic as we prioritised the delivery of patient care, but the trust has since implemented a transformation programme to address all of Ofsted’s concerns.”

More from this theme


Move into apprenticeships loses university’s ‘outstanding’ ranking

A university has lost its ‘outstanding’ Ofsted grade following a move into the apprenticeships market. Kingston University dropped to...

Billy Camden

‘Inconsistent quality’ of degree apprenticeships at university slammed

The courses suffer because they are managed within individual faculties, according to Ofsted

Billy Camden

Ofsted finds ‘concerning number’ of sexual harassment allegations at apprenticeship provider

Ofsted has begun clamping down on 'ineffective' safeguarding measures, including against sexual abuse

Fraser Whieldon

First two Ofsted full-inspection reports bring ‘good’ news to colleges

Two colleges have received grade two from a full inspection, with one improving from a grade three

Fraser Whieldon

‘Outstanding’ provider not inspected for 11 years downgraded in first Ofsted report

Inspectors did highlight the provider's 'ambitious curriculum and culture'

Fraser Whieldon

Richard Branson’s Virgin Care training arm takes off with top Ofsted marks

Inspectors lauded apprentices for 'outstanding resilience' during the pandemic

Billy Camden

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One comment

  1. Please, sir, I’m not sure I understand this NHS apprenticeship malarkey. The NHS is given money from the taxpayer via the government. Then they pay some of that money back into the apprenticeship levy and spend it on ‘training’. Otherwise, they will lose that money back to the government.
    In order for this not to happen, the managers in the NHS hold a recruitment drive and put more people on a qualification platform that, in the case of team leader and business administration qualifications probably does not really add value to an already overworked and highly stressed workforce.
    Then, the managers realise that they do not have sufficient trainers to take these learners through their programmes.
    I think that’s how it ‘works’.

    I know that this is a stupid comment, but why have the NHS pay into the levy in the first place? Why not just allocate a training budget so that the right people can be recruited on a needs basis.

    I realise that this idea is massively complicated…………….