Ofsted blasts SEND college for ‘unnecessarily’ putting learners at risk of harm

Safeguarding failings land ‘inadequate’ judgment that leads to several leadership changes

Safeguarding failings land ‘inadequate’ judgment that leads to several leadership changes

The principal and trustees of a SEND college have resigned and two campuses will close after Ofsted discovered major safeguarding failures, including unsafe administration of medications.

In a report published today, the watchdog downgraded Langdon College to ‘inadequate’.

Part of the charity Kisharon Langdon, the college was teaching 29 learners at its London campus and 21 learners at its two campuses in Manchester at the time of inspection. It specialises in teaching students who have a range of special educational and emotional needs with a Jewish ethos.

As a result of the damning report, the charity will close the two Manchester campuses at the end of the year and have informed the Department for Education and local authorities to find alternative placements for learners. The college will however retain its London campus.

The specialist college was last graded ‘good’ by Ofsted in 2013. Since then it has had three consecutive ‘requires improvement’ judgments and three monitoring visits. Its last ‘requires improvement’ result was in January 2022, which was followed by a monitoring visit last March in which inspectors said the college was making ‘reasonable progress’.

Leadership and management was the biggest area of concern for inspectors who found a “weak” culture of safeguarding.

Ofsted said too many staff didn’t have current or relevant knowledge and understanding of the safeguarding risks and threats to the learners in their care.

Inspectors discovered that staff “do not routinely follow” college policies for the administration of medications, including recording how much medication is given to learners and when.

“Learners are put at unnecessary risk of harm by the college staff,” the report said.

The college also was found to have an unsuitable recruitment process by not routinely checking criminal records, gaps in employment history or references for new staff.

“Consequently, leaders and managers do not create a safe environment for learners,” the report added.

The report suggests the college parted ways with principal Jane Baker, who has been in post since 2019, shortly after Ofsted called. She has now been replaced by Katie Morley who will join this September.

Ofsted said: “On the day of notification of inspection, the principal of Langdon College was in post, however on the first day of inspection the director of education of Kisharon Langdon stepped in as interim principal to act as nominee for the inspection.”

Just three days after the July 1 to 3 inspection, college trustees and governors resigned and the charity has appointed new trustees.

Emily Haddock, Kisharon Langdon’s director of education, was acting as interim principal after Baker left, while Emma Castleton, the chair of the education committee, has stepped in as interim chair of college trustees.

Inspectors criticised previous leaders’ “poor planning” of the curriculum, leading to too many learners not fulfilling their potential or preparing them for their next steps.

For example, learners continually repeat the same tasks in lessons, make the same products in practical cookery workshops and do not make sufficient progress in their studies.

“Leaders and staff do not have high enough expectations of, and aspirations for, learners,” the report said. “As most staff do not monitor or record learners’ progress well enough, they are unable to share accurate information with parents and carers about the new skills that learners develop.”

The college’s governance arrangements were also found to be “ineffective” as previous governors did not properly hold leaders to account. The recently appointed governing body was too new to evaluate their expertise and the impact of their actions but inspectors did say that they are “well qualified” in SEND and determined to improve the quality of education.

The college was however awarded a ‘good’ for behaviour and attitudes and personal development and ‘requires improvement’ for the quality of education.

Ofsted praised learners’ politeness and helpfulness to tutors, visitors and peers. They said that learners value their friendships and enjoy coming to college.

Another positive from the report was tutors and support staff knowing their learners well, which informs how they communicate with learners who are non-verbal or have limited communication skills. 

As a result, “most learners demonstrate increased confidence and ability, improve their concentration and become increasingly more independent in their learning.”

Richard Franklin, chief executive of Kisharon Langdon, said: “We deeply value the support from local rabbinic leadership, local authorities, and community leaders. Our actions reflect Kisharon Langdon’s unwavering commitment to high standards, safeguarding, and continuous improvement. We are confident these necessary measures will lead to positive outcomes for the future.”

Latest education roles from

Programme Manager – Prison Education – HMP Coldingley

Programme Manager – Prison Education – HMP Coldingley

Milton Keynes College

Tutor / Assessor – Electrical Installation

Tutor / Assessor – Electrical Installation

Carshalton College

BARBERING TUTOR

BARBERING TUTOR

Milton Keynes College

DEPUTY EDUCATION MANAGER; Internal Applicants only – Prison Education – HMP Springhill

DEPUTY EDUCATION MANAGER; Internal Applicants only – Prison Education – HMP Springhill

Milton Keynes College

Deputy Head of School – Science, Technology, Engineering & Professional

Deputy Head of School – Science, Technology, Engineering & Professional

Kingston College

Chief Executive

Chief Executive

Scottish Funding Council

Sponsored posts

Sponsored post

#GE2024: Listen now as Let’s Go Further outlines the FE and skills priorities facing our new government

The Skills and Education Group podcast, Let’s Go Further, aims to challenge the way we all think about skills...

Advertorial
Sponsored post

How can we prepare learners for their future in an ever-changing world?

By focusing their curriculums on transferable skills, digital skills, and sustainability, colleges and schools can be confident that learners...

Advertorial
Sponsored post

Why we’re backing our UK skills champions (and why you should too)

This August, teams from over 200 nations will gather to compete in the sticky heat of the Paris summer...

Advertorial
Sponsored post

Is your organisation prepared for a major incident?

We live in an unpredictable world where an unforeseen incident or environmental event could disrupt a Further Education (FE)...

Advertorial

More from this theme

Ofsted

Ofsted’s website shows FE sub-judgments for first time

The move comes four months after the watchdog made the same change to schools' profiles

Josh Mellor
Ofsted

Coffey with Camden: Spilling the beans on Ofsted reforms

A Q&A with the inspectorate's COO

Billy Camden
Ofsted

Ofsted names new ‘external reference group’ members

Groups will offer 'independent advice and challenge' as watchdog embarks on wide-ranging reforms, but FE and skills representation is...

Shane Chowen
Ofsted

Ofsted vows to ‘tailor’ inspections and report cards to FE and skills

Chief inspector says the watchdog has heard the sector's concerns 'loud and clear'

Billy Camden

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 Comments

  1. Phillip Hatton

    Good to see Ofsted backtracking on their previous decision not to publish text for safeguarding when it is so bad, especially with the type of learner being taught. How on earth has it got so bad when the provider has been subject to inspection for so many years. Also shocked by the lack of governance and checking of safeguarding by a safeguarding governor. As a safeguarding governor at a college it was normal to check things like a single central record and adherence to safer recruitment annually. It would be very useful if Ofsted had an annual one day check by an HMI on every specialist college with vulnerable learners to check that this is not happening elsewhere.

  2. Another example of how ‘colleges’ get chance after chance given to them to improve and they fail. An ITP would have been closed down with first inadequate rating with no support or time to improve.
    ‘Level playing field’ I dont think so.
    The students have been let down by all. Here hoping they get placed somewhere that cares about them and not just about the funding they can get.