Influential MP calls for inquiry over fears £2bn Kickstart scheme has become ‘chancer’s charter’

The chair of an influential committee of MPs has called for an investigation into the government’s Kickstart scheme after FE Week revealed how firms based outside the UK or with no trading history were selected as “gateway” providers.

Meg Hillier (pictured), who heads the parliamentary Public Accounts Committee, was “shocked” to hear how firms were set up overnight to benefit from the taxpayer-funded scheme. She is now referring the case to the National Audit Office to scrutinise the spending.

The Labour MP for Hackney South and Shoreditch is concerned that the situation has “opened up another chancer’s charter”.

Hillier told FE Week: “This should be investigated. If the DWP is not already doing so, I would be shocked. I will also write to the department to find out what is going on here.”

Since the launch of the new £2 billion wage-subsidised employment programme in September, small employers have had to use “gateway” companies – which include colleges, chambers of commerce and hundreds of private companies – where they have fewer than 30 vacancies, according to Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) policy.

Gateway providers “must” have “experience of managing partnership agreements with third parties” and “robust financial and governance processes to manage the application”, the policy adds.

The DWP has issued more than 600 approved firms a per-job placement fee of £300, plus up to £1,500 for every 16 to 24-year-old on Universal Credit who they put through the scheme if they continue to help with job support and training.

But the DWP is understood to be so concerned about the quality of gateway providers that it has now stopped taking applications and scrapped the requirement for small employers to use them from 3 February.

Examples of gateway firms found by FE Week include Kickstart Jobs Ltd which, according to Companies House, was incorporated just three months ago.

Another, KA001 Limited, lists a Gmail contact email address on the gov.uk Kickstart website. Its first set of accounts filed in November 2020 shows “total assets less liabilities” of £100.

FE Week also found the example of Casual Speakers Ltd, a DWP-authorised Kickstart gateway firm which Companies House lists as being based in Tel-Aviv, Israel, and therefore has not filed accounts in the UK.

After hearing of our findings, Hiller said there was “a real issue here”.

She added: “Over the whole of the Covid pandemic we have seen the government letting out contracts fast, but for this one they seem to have contracted to companies that only set up in order to get the money. If that is not a chancer’s charter, I’m not sure what is.”

To become a gateway provider, the DWP said firms first go through automated due diligence checks via a “Cabinet Office spotlight tool” which only takes “seconds” to complete. They can then also be subject to human checks.

FE Week also found many companies advertising themselves as being a Kickstart gateway with no history of job matching.

Firms advertising their Kickstart gateway services include Banana Scoops Ltd, an ice cream supplier to Ocado which claimed on Twitter to have 70 placements already approved with the DWP. Another encouraging applications from small employers is Rollerworld Ltd, a company with an ice rink in Essex.

Asked whether the DWP had launched its own investigation into the matter, a DWP spokesperson said: “Kickstart gateways have been subject to stringent checks to ensure we are careful with taxpayers’ money. All companies who applied to become a gateway were required to be registered with Companies House.”

Labour’s shadow work and pensions secretary, Jonny Reynolds, said: “Billions of pounds of public money is being poured into Kickstart and we must ensure it is being spent well to create meaningful job opportunities for young people.

“Young people and businesses can’t afford any more incompetence from this government.”

 

Externally-set papers aren’t ‘exams by the back door’, says Ofqual chief

Proposals for externally-set papers to help inform teacher GCSE and A-level grades this year are not “exams by the back door”, Ofqual’s chief regulator has said after students flagged concerns.

Ofqual is proposing that papers, providing by exams boards, can help teachers award a grade to their pupils this year after exams were scrapped.

But the papers, dubbed “mini exams”, have clearly alarmed some students, who have flagged their concern in Ofqual’s consultation on the plans.

Ofqual chief Simon Lebus has published a blog today to “allay concerns that some students have expressed to us – that these are exams by the back door. They are not.

“But an externally-set task would help teachers by providing them with an external reference point, giving them greater confidence in the grade they were awarding.”

He added the papers would “support teachers to assess their students consistently”, and could be used as “just one source of evidence to determine a student’s grade. Other sources of evidence could include mock exam results, internal assessments or work already completed.”

“Having something set externally provides a useful reference point, and helps to support consistency between different students in a school or college, and between schools and colleges in different parts of the country,” Lebus added.

He said exam boards could also “sample teachers’ marking as part of the external quality assurance arrangements and look to see how the school or college is using different sources of evidence”. Ofqual has sought views on whether to make the paper compulsory.

Lebus said using questions similar in style and format to normal exam papers “isn’t because we’re trying to squeeze in an exam via a different route. It is because most students would be familiar with the sorts of questions used, as students typically use past papers to help them prepare for their exams. It just means there could be questions in a form that students are used to.”

Teachers could also have a choice of topics, so they can “take account of what has or hasn’t been fully taught due to the disruption. The exact approach would have to be tailored for each subject, with exam boards confirming the details.”

 

‘Clear there’s no straightforward options’

Ofqual confirmed today it has received over 90,000 responses to its consultation, which closes tonight. That equates to a response every 13 seconds since the consultation was launched at 3.30pm on Friday, January 15.

It’s also over seven times more than the 12,623 responses received from last year’s consultation on replacing exams.

Ofqual has drawn in “extra resource” to deal with the deluge, with a team reading “all the responses” as they are submitted.

Last night they said the “great majority” of over 86,000 responses had been read and are “confident” that they will be able to produce a “full report in good time to allow prompt decision making”.

However the regulator refused to provide details of how many people are working on it. Ofqual has committed to announcing its plans in the week of February 22.

Lebus said several themes are emerging, adding: “What is clear is that there are no straightforward options for how exams are to be replaced.”

 

EPI backs assessments for all, ASCL warns against mandatory papers

The Association of School and College Leaders has today backed using such papers, which they say should be done under “reasonably controlled conditions is possible”.

“However, they should not be treated as ‘mini-exams’… The use of these papers or questions should be encouraged, rather than mandated,” ASCL added.

Meanwhile the Education Policy Institute has said a “short, standardised assessment” should be taken by all students in May or June, in most subjects.

The think tank has also said school and college grades should be “anchored” to those issued in 2019 to avoid “excessive grade increases” and that students in alternative provision should be funded to stay at school or college “for one or two additional years”.

Registrations for DfE’s £1m ‘skills toolkit’ could be from all around the globe

Registrations for courses on the government’s “skills toolkit” that have been celebrated by ministers could be coming from anywhere in the world, the Department for Education has admitted.

More than £1 million of public money has been spent on developing and advertising the “platform”, which directs visitors to free online content provided by the likes of Amazon, the Open University, Microsoft and LinkedIn.

Ministers across government have hailed the success of the toolkit since it launched in April 2020. Education secretary Gavin Williamson declared that it had had a “transformational” impact on the digital and numeracy skills for England’s out-of-work people during the pandemic.

But little is known about who is accessing the content as most do not require registrations. And, as FE Week previously revealed, significant overcounting has already led to revised estimates of “course start” claims in official statistics which continue to include web hits.

FE Week has now discovered that the DfE is also unable to identify from which countries the registrations are coming. The department said the data is held and reported by the relevant providers who “do not provide country data, so DfE cannot confirm the country related to course registrations”.

A number of providers with courses on the skills toolkit have confirmed that they do not filter for registrations that are England-based only.

Toby Perkins, Labour’s shadow apprenticeships and lifelong learning minister, criticised the DfE for “failing to enact themselves the kind of data collection they would routinely insist on from other providers”.

He added: “The government is very happy to make statistically questionable claims about the skills toolkit, yet it’s clear that it has no idea who is accessing the website and to what extent those people are utilising it.

“No one wants to make this small and potentially valuable initiative unduly bureaucratic, but it is important that they are aware of who is using it, who it is reaching and failing to reach, and that information should be both collected and published.

“We all want to celebrate successful initiatives but, without this data, I don’t think it’s possible to be sure how successful the skills toolkit is in improving the skills and opportunities of British workers and learners.”

When asked if the DfE was concerned that it had no grasp on what countries course registrations were coming from, a spokesperson said: “We are committed to ensuring that the skills toolkit is accessible and of value to people across the country.”

They added that the department was “able to identify England-based website visits in line with GDPR” through the toolkit.

This latest revelation comes as FE Week continues to challenge the DfE to release the names of firms that were given almost £800,000 to develop the platform. The department has kept the names a secret so far, refusing a freedom of information request.

Through the same FOI request the DfE did release a breakdown of the 118,980 course registrations by each provider on the skills toolkit as of 1 November 2020, which has caused further concern at the official figures being reported.

A course provided by Corndel called “organisational financial management: an introduction”, for example, is reported as having had 8,090 starts. However, the provider says that it does not track the usage of the materials and no “registration” data has been provided to the DfE.

The DfE has also come under fire for claiming the courses on the skills toolkit are of “high quality”, considering they receive no quality assurance from the likes of Ofsted or Ofqual and many of the courses simply involve short video tutorials or PDF documents.

Sue Pember, a former director of FE funding in the DfE, previously said: “When the DfE puts out its own advertising for the toolkit, it always talks about good quality. But under whose judgment? It may be, but how do they know?”

She added that the DfE should be “cautious” as “website hits or even signatures on enrolment forms do not equate to learning taking place”.

Latest official data published by the DfE claims that, as of 27 December 2020, there have been an estimated 138,000 course registrations. The department does accept that these are “experimental statistics” and says it is working to collect “more robust estimates of registrations”.

Mayors want more courses included under lifetime skills guarantee

Regional mayors are preparing to plead for courses to be added to the government’s lifetime skills guarantee offer after ministers controversially excluded critical economic sectors from the list.

However, most remain tight-lipped about which industries they want to target.

Almost 400 level 3 qualifications covering sectors including engineering, construction, public services and IT will be fully funded for adults without a full qualification at level 3 – equivalent to two full A-levels – from April 2021 under the £95 million scheme.

But industries such as hospitality, tourism and the media have been left off the government list because they are deemed to be a low priority with low wages.

Mayoral combined authorities (MCAs) will be allocated a share of the funds to give to their area’s providers to deliver courses through their devolved adult education budgets.  However they have been told that they can only submit requests for additional courses if they are “economically relevant to the local economy”.

The Greater London Authority told FE Week that it was “looking at this issue in detail and expects to submit a request in due course”. The Liverpool City Region is engaging in “detailed discussions” with its colleges and providers to decide which additions to ask for.

The Greater Manchester Combined Authority is “in the process of submitting a list of qualifications to the EFSA, which will focus on Local Industrial Strategy growth sectors”, and the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority is “working proactively with colleges, providers and local businesses to identify any gaps in the course list, with a view to making a request to the DfE for additional courses if required”.

The only mayoral authority that has so far submitted a formal request is in the West Midlands. A spokesperson said that it had asked for “one specific rail engineering qualification to be added to the list to date, as rail is a growing employment sector for us”.

The Department for Education confirmed to FE Week that, if a course is added at the request of a mayoral authority, then it will be made available to everyone in the country through the offer.

Under the department’s rules, there is a “strict condition that funding is used for its intended purpose” by MCAs. Otherwise they face having to hand the funding back to central government.

Funding allocations for each combined authority have not yet been communicated to the relevant mayors despite the approach of the April 2021 start date.

The DfE unveiled the list of level 3 courses under the lifetime skills guarantee offer in December. At the time the department said it had chosen qualifications that were “valued by employers”.

But Tom Bewick, chief executive of the Federation of Awarding Bodies, hit out at this “top-down driven list cooked up in Whitehall”. He said it showed that the DfE had gone for a “convoluted way of trying to ration limited public funds from the get-go, while dressing the whole policy up as being an absolute free learning entitlement, like access to the NHS”.

The new offer builds on a policy in place since 2013. It allows adults up to the age of 23 to be fully funded for their first full level 3 qualification from the adult education budget. Those aged 24 and over have since had to take out an advanced learner loan to pay for the course.

The current entitlement for those aged 23 and below covers nearly 1,200 qualifications, almost four times as many as those made available under the lifetime skills guarantee.

The DfE has said that any qualifications included in this new level 3 adult offer which are not included in the existing entitlement will be made available for 19 to 23-year-old learners.

WorldSkills Diversity and Inclusion Heroes award winners 2021

An apprentice who hosted STEM career events at schools, and a provider giving back to the LGBTQ+ community have been recognised at the WorldSkills UK Diversity and Inclusion Heroes awards.

This is the second year of the awards, following the inaugural event at WorldSkills UK LIVE in 2019, run in partnership with Coca-Cola European Partners.

Seven awards were up for grabs this year and the winners were celebrated at a virtual event on Thursday, hosted by BAME Apprenticeship Awards apprentice of the year Kimmy Kimani. One of them, Rolls-Royce management accountancy apprentice Haider Ali (pictured top), said it was a “complete shock” when he found out he had won the rising star award.

Having joined the manufacturing giant as a higher apprentice, WorldSkills UK said Ali was “determined” to make a difference by getting involved with initiatives to support an inclusive workforce. He has hosted events on STEM career opportunities for pupils at local schools.

WorldSkills said he, along with Derby City Council, had “worked hard to raise the aspirations of primary school children in some of Derby’s most deprived areas”.

Ali said: “From my own personal experiences, I think it is really important that young people have access to role models, so they know – whatever space they want to enter – there is room for them.

“I want to help make a difference by sharing my own experiences and inspire more young people from all backgrounds to take up an apprenticeship.”

Gareth Fallows, managing director of Stoke-based Acorn Training, won the UK’s role model of the year award. WorldSkills UK said he found “safety and security” within his LGBTQ+ community and further education when he was a teenager.

Gareth Fallows

After graduating from Manchester Metropolitan University as a teacher, Fallows founded Acorn because he was “determined to give back to the LGBTQ+ community”, WorldSkills said.

Acorn has created a “safe and inclusive space for all communities” and, in the past year,  has supported 1,350 unemployed people, with 68 per cent achieving sustained employment.

That work also earned Acorn another award – the network of the year prize for small-to-medium employers.

Fallows said he was really proud to accept the awards as they recognised the hard work his staff put in “to ensure everyone we work with gets the best life chances”.

The panel of judges included: Ben Blackledge, WorldSkills UK deputy chief executive; Sharon Blyfield, Coca-Cola European Partners’ senior manager for people and culture (GB), early careers and apprenticeships; and Dawn Baker, awarding body NCFE’s director of innovation and investments.

WorldSkills UK chief executive Neil Bentley-Gockmann said they had been “completely blown away by the number and quality of the inspiring entries”. He added: “These awards give us the opportunity to celebrate success with our partners, who are making progress and achieving real impact, and to showcase best practice so we can all learn from each other.”

New data shows improved picture for apprenticeship starts amid pandemic

Apprenticeship starts appear to be recovering after new data showed a less dramatic percentage drop amid the pandemic.

Figures published this morning by the Department for Education show there were 91,100 starts recorded from August to October 2020, compared to 125,800 reported for the same period pre-Covid-19 in 2019/20 – a 28 per cent fall. 

It is an improved picture on the previous quarter of the pandemic, when 43,600 starts were achieved between May and July 2020, compared to 75,500 starts for the same period in 2019 – a 42 per cent fall.

The DfE points out that the 2020/21 data “covers a period affected by varying Covid-19 restrictions, which will have impacted on apprenticeship and traineeship learning and also provider reporting behaviour via the Individualised Learner Record”, adding that “extra care should be taken in comparing and interpreting data presented in this release”. 

For the data recorded in the first quarter of 2020/21, those aged under 19 accounted for the biggest fall, with starts for this age group dropping 42 per cent from 40,700 last year to 23,800. 

Starts for level 2 apprenticeships similarly dropped by 43 per cent – from 41,000 to 23,300 – while the only increase in starts in quarter one of 2020/21 was seen among higher apprenticeships, which rose by 1 per cent from 29,800 to 30,100. 

Today’s statistics also provide an update for take-up of the chancellor’s apprenticeship incentive scheme, which hands employers a “bonus” of up to £2,000 to take on a new apprentice between 1 August 2020 and 31 March 2021. 

As at 8 January 2021, a total of 18,670 starts were planned under the scheme. The Treasury had budgeted for up to 100,000 incentive payments for new apprentice hires.

Association of Employment and Learning Providers chief executive Jane Hickie said her organisation had previously warned that the incentives for apprenticeships “weren’t enough to make a significant difference”, as today’s data suggests.

“The chancellor recognises that young people are being hurt most by this recession, as today’s figures show, but his March statement has to do a lot more to reverse these falls,” she added.

Responding to today’s figures, skills minister Gillian Keegan said: “Apprenticeships form a vital part of our new Skills for Jobs White Paper which will transform post-16 education and training, helping to deliver the skills individuals, businesses and the economy need to build back better from the pandemic.

“As of January 8th 2021 almost 19,000 applications had been submitted from employers for our offer of a cash boost of up to £2000 to hire new apprentices, showing the value they know apprenticeships can bring to their business.  This offer is available until March 2021, so businesses can create even more opportunities and give more people the life changing chance to kick start or upskill their career.”

She added: “I know the pandemic is continuing to impact businesses across the country and some apprentices have lost their job, or are facing redundancy. Our Redundancy Support Service continues to offer free advice to apprentices and help to find them alternative options.”

Profile: Dipa Ganguli, principal, Sutton College Adult Education

Newly-honoured principal, Dipa Ganguli could teach us all a thing or two about keeping calm and carrying on, finds JL Dutaut

If college leaders feel aggrieved at being an afterthought to so many ministers’ education announcements, then look no further than Dipa Ganguli for advice on how to stay calm and carry on.

Take the New Year’s Eve announcement on the delayed start of term and compulsory mass testing, for example. Initially, it lacked any mention of adult education at all. And that’s just standard.

But the Sutton College principal is as sanguine as it’s possible to be. With smiling acceptance of the new lockdown, she simply offers the following: “It’s okay. Most of our courses were online anyway. Except for, you know, the practical courses.”

Context matters to understand quite how much resilience is on show from Ganguli here. On New Year’s Day of 2020, with Covid only beginning to make distant headlines, the Learning and Work Institute published its latest report revealing that 4 million adult learners had been lost in a decade.

It’s not tutors’ fault we can’t run courses, so we just take the hit

This new closure – the second since that report – is hitting Sutton College in its pocket. “The college run a mixture of fee paying as well as funded courses. Whatever we could move online, we have. The rest – like pottery and floristry – we’ve just have to cancel.”

Such cancellations hit the college’s revenue stream hard. “We still pay the tutors because it’s no fault of theirs that we can’t run the course,” says Ganguli. “So we just take the hit.”

Not that the college would have any other choice when it comes to closures. The average age of learners at Sutton is 45, which puts many of them in high-risk categories. So even if it was treated as the business it fundamentally is – as opposed to a public sector body like a school – and allowed to stay open as an essential service, the simple fact is that many of its courses couldn’t operate.

A year ago, when LWI CEO, Stephen Evans warned that “with our economy set to undergo transformational change in the coming years, lifelong learning has never been more important,” he couldn’t have imagined the depth of crisis Covid would represent.

In November, the organisation’s head of research, Emily Jones interpreted the results of their latest Adult Participation in Learning survey. In her article in these pages, she voiced concern that while the pandemic and its varied economic consequences correlated with an increase in interest, the survey revealed stark inequalities. People who were younger, better off, in work and already had qualifications were more likely to have engaged, regardless of furlough.

In other words, those Sutton College students who have seen their courses cancelled twice were already those on the fringe of engagement – on self- or community-funded courses. That doesn’t bode well for future attendance, but Ganguli is an optimist and “hopeful we’ll be able to offer those courses” when the lockdown ends.

Dipa Ganguli

Optimism isn’t enough though. As Jones reminded our readers in November, “learning is addictive” and under Ganguli’s leadership Sutton College has been versatile in its attempts to hook those potential learners.

The digital divide continues to make headlines in this new lockdown and the focus is entirely on the government’s efforts to get laptops and internet into the homes of disadvantaged families. But what about making use of those laptops?

“They’re talking about digital and how there’s no access to computers,” says Ganguli, “But there’s no digital skills. We also found parents don’t have the basic literacy and numeracy skills to be able to support their children with homeschooling. So we’ve done quite a lot of work with local primary schools and through our family learning provision, giving them the skills to support their children with their work.”

A policy win-win. Parents see their skills improve. Their children are better supported. And those parents get a taste of learning too – a direct sense of accomplishment and pride in the outcomes.

Sadly, as Ganguli says, “that doesn’t get a mention”.

Laptops? Many parents lack the skills to support home schooling

It does get noticed though. Delhi-born Ganguli was listed in the New Year’s honours list for her contributions to adult education and will receive her OBE when Covid restrictions allow. She says of the pending award that it’s “a validation for all of the Adult and Community Education sector that works with some of the most disadvantaged learners in our community, providing opportunities to upskill, reskill and succeed in their lives.”

For all that enthusiasm though, Ganguli does have “slight” concerns for her beloved sector. She is stoic, but she concedes that “there are quite a few tensions we’re working with”.

Not least among them is the ongoing consultation on adult education funding. Typically, her worry is first and foremost for what’s right for students rather than the college’s purse. “There is definitely a need to have entry level qualifications, levels one and two,” she tells me, “Not everybody is ready to move straight on to the level three qualification.”

And adult funding comes from multiple sources – all of them are concerning, not just because of the pandemic. “Now we’re concentrating on what this lockdown means and financial sustainability for a lot of us. We’ve got the added tension of working with local authorities. I am lucky mine’s very responsive, but there are some who are in trouble. They look at adult education as easy funds.”

Dipa Ganguli

Born to a family of accountants, Ganguli knew early on that profession wasn’t for her. Nevertheless, she has made college business her business and the story of how she came to do that is itself one of upskilling and reskilling.

Convent school-educated, she was funnelled by the Indian qualifications system towards maths and business. While studying for her degree in economics and envisioning a career in commerce, she met her future husband, then an English tourist visiting the area, who happened to attend a party she was at.

They fell in love, married and Ganguli moved here with him, completing her degree with the university of Delhi at a distance before the conveniences of ‘remote learning’, let alone email. Her final exams were invigilated at the British High Commission offices.

She worked as she settled here too, and it was as a panel secretary for social services that she “first encountered racism”. Demeaned in the pursuance of her role, she eventually got a post teaching ESOL (English as a Second or Other Language) “and there, in that environment, when I saw the respect my colleagues gave these learners who were coming through with such struggles, it was completely different. It was truly inspirational.”

But that was after the experience of working in social services had caused her to have a crisis of confidence, to doubt that she belonged here, and to return to her parents in India. Adult education has them to thank for her return, and her marriage has long outlived that early crisis too (27 years!).

Dipa Ganguli Erasmus

As a mother of three young children, Ganguli had taken a step from ESOL into college business, making good on her economics education as MIS and business manager for Croydon Adult Learning and Training. But finding herself on the leadership team, she was frustrated that teachers ignored her feedback because of her lack of teaching experience.

So she showed them. She joined Sutton College as a sessional tutor in numeracy while she qualified part-time as a teacher – all the while taking a promotion as Croydon’s service strategy manager. Her feedback is heeded now!

Cancelling courses again has been hard on our students

And she showed the racists too. Two more career steps to attain principalship of Sutton College via assistant principalship at the Westminster Adult Education service. Lengthy service as a HOLEX policy forum member. Board member of the Association of Adult Education and Training Organisations. Her continuing contribution will see her meet the Queen this year.

And when she does, Her Majesty will be in good company to remind us all of the virtue of keeping calm and carrying on.

“When students came back in September,” Ganguli tells me, “they were saying how grateful they were just to be able to come into college and get a bit of human interaction. So [cancelling courses again] has been hard. But at least the funded provision is all online. So I’m grateful for what we can provide.”

Perhaps the monarch can be persuaded to explain to ministers what Ganguli knows and government research has shown. Beyond the blunt measure of outcomes and preconceptions about pottery and floristry courses, investment in adult education is a net benefit – to health both physical and mental, to social and community cohesion including democratic participation.

And also to the economy.

Colleges to reopen by 8 March at the earliest, DfE confirms

Colleges will begin reopening to more students from 8 March if the government’s Covid-19 vaccination targets are met, the Department for Education has confirmed.

Prime minister Boris Johnson (pictured) announced yesterday that this would the earliest that schools could reopen, but failed to mention whether this would apply to the further education sector.

Last night the DfE confirmed colleges are part of the same plan. If all the people in the four most vulnerable groups are vaccinated by 15 February, the government will look at fully reopening schools and colleges three weeks later, by 8 March, as that is when those groups will have developed immunity to Covid-19.

Since January, only vulnerable young people and the children of critical workers have been given face-to-face tuition at FE providers. The DfE has confirmed this will continue for the time being.

Johnson said yesterday the goal “must be to buy the extra weeks we need to immunise the most vulnerable and get this virus under control so that together we can defeat this most wretched disease, reclaim our lives, once and for all”.

The DfE has also announced an extra £300 million for early years, providers, schools and colleges to provide catch-up tutoring and a collaboration with the education sector to develop plans for summer schools and a “Covid premium” to support catch-up.

In light of the “huge impact” extending school and college closures will have on students’ learning, the DfE has said it will work with providers, parents and teachers to develop a “long-term plan” for students to make up their learning over the course of this parliament.

Education secretary Gavin Williamson said it is the country’s “priority” to get students back to face-to-face education, “but it is crucial we do this at the right time and I want to assure parents, teachers, children and young people that schools, colleges and universities will be the first to fully return as soon as the public health picture allows it”.

The restrictions on face-to-face education will be reviewed again in the middle of next month, and the government has said it is committed to publishing a plan for leaving lockdown by the end of February.

Responding to the prime minister’s statement, the University and College Union called for all but essential teaching to be kept online until at least April for colleges.

Jo Grady said staff “need to be able to plan their work over the coming months in the knowledge they will not be forced to do unnecessary and unsafe in-person activities,” including working in offices on campus, libraries, laboratories and classrooms.

“College staff are burnt out from the chaotic and unsustainable demands which the sector has placed on them this year. We need certainty and stability if staff are to continue delivering the best possible remote learning for students.”

She added that it was “scandalous” that the prime minister had “not even bothered to mention further or higher education as part of his statement on plans to fully reopen school sites”.

Revealed: How employers claim the £1,000 traineeship incentive

Employers can claim the government’s promised £1,000 for a completed traineeship work placement using an online form from today.

The form is now live on the gov.uk website and it is understood claims will be checked against the monthly Individualised Learner Record data submitted by traineeship providers before payments are made.

The £1,000 payment is limited to 10 trainees for each of the nine regions in England, per employer.

The Department for Education confirmed the £1,000 can only be claimed for work placements that were “started and completed” from 1 September 2020 to 31 July 2021.

The employer bonuses were first announced back in July in chancellor Rishi Sunak’s Plan for Jobs and as part of a £111 million funding injection into the traineeships programme, in a bid to triple the number of starts in the current academic year, to the end July 2021.

Commenting on the launch of the incentive payment claim form, Sunak said: “My number one priority is to support, protect and create jobs, which is why for the first time ever we’re giving businesses £1,000 to cover the cost of trainee work experience, because we know that traineeships are a proven way to give young people the skills and opportunity, they need to be ready for work.

“We also know that our young people will be vital in the national effort to recover from the pandemic, so I urge businesses to seize this opportunity and help us harness the talent of our young people and offer hope for the future.”

Keegan added: “We’re pulling out all the stops to help young people get the skills and confidence they need to progress. This cash boost will help employers of all sizes provide more traineeship opportunities, to invest in their workforce so they can rebuild and grow, giving young people a vital route to start their apprenticeship journey, get their first job or go on to further study.”

Introduced as a flagship pre-employability programme in 2013, traineeships are eligible for 16 to 24-year-olds and training providers are funded by the Education and Skills Funding Agency to deliver pre-employment training and arrange work placements from six weeks to twelve months.

Starts on the scheme hit a high of 24,100 in 2015/16 but have been dropping since and reached just 12,100 in 2019/20.

A £65 million tender to expand the number of 19 to 24 traineeships was recently run and outcomes were revealed last week – the funding of which is hoped to fund an additional 20,000 starts between 1 February and 31 July 2021.

In a bid to triple starts, growth funding has also been handed to providers to deliver more 16-to-19 traineeships, the funding rate for the 19-to-24s has risen from £970 to £1,500 and the eligibility of the scheme has been expanded to include people that already hold full level 3 qualifications, such as A-levels.