Testing times? Inside the reopening of colleges

An Herculean effort has seen colleges deploy mass Covid testing to support a safe reopening. So how did it go, and what does the future hold? JL Dutaut finds out

“I wasn’t coping at home although my teachers really tried with me.”

Our dominant image of vulnerable learners amid this pandemic may be of children and young people. But these words were spoken last week to Westminster Adult Education Services principal Arinola Edeh by one of her students.

Vulnerability has been revealed everywhere by this year-long crisis. Colleges have proven to be a vital safety net. That’s why closing their doors again over two months ago was traumatic. Having welcomed students back once before, the picture of what was being inflicted on them was all the clearer.

However, this second round of closures has seen colleges drastically increase and improve their online learning provision. At Havant and South Downs College (HSDC), for example, principal Mike Gaston notes that training staff to facilitate live lessons has really paid off. “Teachers have expressed their gratitude for it,” he tells me. “It reassured teachers that their students were making good progress and has meant the return to lessons at college has been seamless for many.”

His students concur. With a caveat. “Live lessons during lockdown have been really varied and interesting,” one said. “But it’s much better learning with friends in class.”

The buzz has returned to our campuses

The feeling is shared across all the colleges I’ve spoken with this week. Everyone is grateful for the technological innovations of the past 12 months. But they are even more grateful to be back on site.  As Askham Bryan College, equine student Alicia Easdon put it quite literally, “I’m very ready to get back in the saddle!”

Animal management curriculum director Jo Richards tells me the horses are just as happy as Alicia. She and her colleagues, Fiona Macdonald and Iain Glendinning, are “over the moon” that students are back as the college literally comes back to life. The same phenomenon is happening at Bedford College Group’s agricultural college. CEO, Ian Pryce tells me one member of staff said they were pleased to get students back “because the lambing needed doing!”

As Pryce says, “The buzz has returned to our campuses.” Spring has clearly sprung, and there is perhaps no better analogy than that for the general joy of the past week. But the real reason this reopening feels different is perhaps the prime minister’s insistence that there be no U-turns on his roadmap to Covid freedom.

Arinola Edeh testing times feature

Despite the work to make settings Covid-safe, another lockdown always felt somewhat inevitable in the summer and autumn terms. Now, with mass testing in place and a successful vaccination roll-out in progress, there is genuine optimism that the end is in sight. London South East Colleges CEO Sam Parrett echoes every principal I’ve spoken with when she tells me she hopes “we can all look forward to some stability and a return to our normal lives as we head towards summer”.

But the first thing to note is that this is still far from a full return. At Stanmore College, for example, principal Sarbdip Noonan tells me they “are continuing online learning for the rest of term to reduce footfall on campus. The plan is for 65 per cent of students to return on site.”

And beyond phased reopenings, leaders are dealing with students who can’t attend and, more challengingly, some who won’t. MidKent College principal, Simon Cook, whose community suffered one of the highest Covid rates in the UK in November says “that has changed the psychology for many, and some feel safer in their homes. We need to help them feel comfortable and be patient.”

Some feel safer in their homes. We need to help them feel comfortable

For Dipa Ganguli, whose adult education college also caters for 16- to 19-year-olds, reopening hasn’t happened at all. “Prior to the PM’s announcement,” she says, “I had made a decision not to return on site until after the Easter holidays.” Staff at Sutton College are being tested weekly at the council’s testing centre, but the college doesn’t have the facility yet to test their learners.

Sutton College’s example reflects nothing if not the diversity of the further education sector and the fairly unique trust placed in the sector’s leaders to implement a locally led, safety-first reopening. For the vast majority, it has begun in earnest, supported by a staggering logistical effort. “It’s been no small feat,” says Leeds City College principal Suzanne Gallagher. “But by setting up mass testing, it has allowed us to identify a small number of cases and act quickly.”

Parrett’s LSEC conducted 5,000 tests last week. NCG CEO Liz Bromley tells me staff and student volunteers carried out 10,063 tests across the group’s campuses. Pryce reports an average of close to 1,000 lateral flow tests (LFTs) a day. Education Partnership NorthEast carried out 3,000. Mike Gaston says HSDC conducted 7,000.

Testing at Newcastle sixth form

And not one college leader I’ve spoken to reports a hitch. Student engagement is high across the piece too. Cook says numbers over the past week show “the significant majority of students have chosen to take part, and we expect that number to rise as the testing process is demystified”.

But while the time it takes to realise this effort has been accounted for in the government’s decision to allow colleges to determine the speed and extent of their reopening, it is unclear whether ministers have fully grasped the cost.

By and large, mass testing in colleges is being supported by an army of staff and student volunteers. For students, especially health and social care students who can tot it up as work experience, it’s hard to see a down side to this civic engagement. But for staff, it’s an additional role on top of managing increased on-site demand as well as ongoing remote provision. Workload implications mean potentially long-term costs in retention and recruitment.

Agency staff are brought in at a cost to carry out the actual testing

In the main, the ‘Big Society’ approach is working. For MidKent, for example, one good turn has earned another. “One of our local hospital trusts has been using a part of our land for over a year,” Cook tells me. “So they offered to help with staffing for the short period we need.”

But Liz Bromley tells me that NCG’s London colleges – Lewisham and Southwark – have both had to rely on agency staff to support their test centre volunteers. The group hopes to recover some of the cost, but it’s as yet unclear whether that will be possible. Stanmore College principal Sarbdip Noonan also reports that, while her staff and student volunteers control the queues, “agency staff are brought in at a cost to carry out the actual testing”.

It’s hard to know how widespread this hidden cost is, but it is clearly impacting unevenly.

What appears to be more evenly spread is the result of all this work. It’s an unscientific sample for sure, but almost every leader who’s touched on the subject of positive cases with me, regardless of region, has reported the same outcome – about one positive case in every 1,000 LFTs. The exception is LSEC where, Sam Parrett tells me, there have been 0 positives from 5,000 tests.

Sarbdip Noonan testing times feature

This has meant the return to classrooms itself has been able to progress with little disruption. But sustaining that depends on one other key factor: compliance with guidance on face coverings that leave providers with no recourse to consequences.

Happily, all the leaders who spoke to me report high compliance. Gaston says his students feel “like stakeholders in avoiding any further disruption to face-to-face education”. Liz Bromley acknowledges that “there are a very small number who are resistant. We just make sure that social distancing is in place. As long as the testing is happening, we are a little more confident that there is a very, very low risk of transmission.”

All in all then, last week’s reopening has been a nationwide success. And from this week, the demand on colleges will begin to lessen as students go home with self-test kits. The result is that “staff are generally very optimistic about the end of the academic year,” says Noonan, echoing every leader I’ve spoken with.

But as Bromley explains, most don’t expect “the real, genuine reopening” to be until September. Things will begin to look like normal, she hopes, but “even then I suspect there will be a new normal we’ll have to get used to”.

Transition this year could be slightly bumpier than normal

Not least among the challenges college leaders are anticipating is welcoming new students in the autumn. Cook, for example, is concerned that “we’ve not been able to welcome any prospective students to our campuses. We’ve done some great work with online open events, but the transition this year could be slightly bumpier than normal.”

For sure, the edtech revolution has helped and will continue to help. Edeh, whose college has so far only reopened for those on practical courses and entry-level students, is certain of that. “We don’t expect to move all our provision online,” she says, “but we have now seen its potential for establishing different delivery models.”

But if the past week has brought one thing front and centre for everyone, it is, as Parrett says, “the importance of social contact for everyone’s wellbeing”.

The crucial role of colleges in supporting good mental health is a message all seem to agree with. And they do so with a depth of feeling that was perhaps lacking from this discussion in pre-pandemic times.

The past week has let that genie out of the bottle, and it doesn’t look like there’s any putting it back.

So saddle up. The ride into Covid’s sunset promises to be an exciting one.

Impact of ‘spiteful’ ESFA adult education claw back plans revealed

A college has warned it will have to hand back over £4 million under the Education and Skills Funding Agency’s “spiteful” adult education budget claw back plans.

Leicester College told FE Week it has forecast to spend 53 per cent of its £11 million allocation for 2020/21 – meaning it could have to hand back 37 per cent up to the allowance threshold of 90 per cent announced on Monday.

“The college is unlikely to be able to make up the remaining allocation in the final term of the year,” a spokesperson said, as they believe many adult learners are “unwilling” to sign-up until the vaccine programme has completed.

The Association of Colleges has predicted that most of their members will deliver between 75 to 85 per cent of their allocations, which would mean a total clawback of between £22 million and £62 million.

‘Not clear’ what the implications will be

While the cause of under-delivery can largely be attributed to the various national lockdowns owing to Covid-19, Leicester College has been in continuous lockdown with the rest of the city since March 2020.

“The current year has been impacted by the pandemic far more severely than 2019/20,” the college spokesperson said.

While it is “not clear” what the full implications of this will be, the college said it is “clear” there will be consequences for cashflow, for its capital programmes and future plans for 2021/22.

The college is refurbishing its Abbey Park campus ahead of starting the government’s flagship T Level courses in a number of different areas this September.

Adult education threshold ‘feels a bit spiteful’

The ESFA has come in for widespread criticism for setting the 90 per cent threshold, which will affect grant-funded colleges and councils with AEB, 19 to 24 traineeships, and advanced learner loans bursary allocations.

adult education
Julian Gravatt

AoC deputy chief executive Julian Gravatt warned in a blog on his association’s website yesterday that other colleges will lose “six figure sums”.

Plus, he said, it could cancel out funding for the government’s new level 3 entitlement, due to start next month under the new National Skills Fund.

“It is good that DfE has accepted the need for a lower threshold, but a 10 per cent tolerance is not much given the disruptions of the year and will leave some colleges scrambling for enrolments or savings,” Gravatt added.

Sue Pember, formerly a senior Department for Education official before becoming director of policy for adult education network Holex, said during an FE Week webcast earlier this week the threshold “just makes it really hard, and feels a bit spiteful”.

Bob Harrison, chair of adult education provider Northern College and a governor of Oldham College, tweeted following the announcement: “So let me get this straight: The government forces our colleges to close and therefore we are unable to recruit and run our short courses.

“But we have already employed teachers and have fixed costs. Then the ESFA are going to clawback if we don’t hit 90 per cent of target? Its Catch 22.”

Luke Rake, principal of land-based Kingston Maurward College expressed his indignation, tweeting: “And lo! Adult education is killed off completely.

“Couldn’t deliver due to enforced lockdowns, didn’t furlough staff based on ESFA advice, ESFA now tells us we’ve still got to give the money back, having paid wages for a year. Helpful. Thanks.”

Threshold a ‘fair representation’ of delivery

A much more generous threshold of 68 per cent was set for last year’s AEB.

But in the announcement on Monday, the agency said the 90 per cent threshold was a “fair representation” of grant-funded providers’ average delivery.

They acknowledged the situation “is still difficult for providers,” but they “have been able to continue remote delivery very successfully during lockdown, having built on the experience of 2019 to 2020 to establish effective contingency arrangements to manage Covid-19 restrictions”.

Threshold rate for college adult education under-delivery lowered – but only to 90%

Colleges that deliver less than 90 per cent of their national adult education budget allocation this year face having their unspent funds clawed back, the Education and Skills Funding Agency announced today.

The agency said this new threshold, much higher than the 68 per cent set for last year, is a “fair representation of grant-funded providers’ average delivery” in 2020/21.

The policy means that only colleges with funding for AEB, 19 to 24 traineeships, and advanced learner loans bursary which hit 90 per cent of their allocations will be able to keep 100 per cent of the money.

Initial reaction from Association of College’s deputy chief executive Julian Gravatt was that “tens of millions of pounds are at risk,” as the ESFA AEB is worth around £450 million to colleges.

Gravatt told FE Week the tolerance is “not much” and would leave colleges “scrambling for enrolments or savings”.

He added: “We’re asking DFE for more information on the estimates that informed the decision and for a reconsideration of the level to avoid pressure on colleges to cut back just when the country needs them to do more.”

Head of policy for adult education network HOLEX Sue Pember called it “very disappointing and doesn’t cover any of the added costs of Covid-safe delivery or the extra support that students needed.

“Decision needs to be reviewed or a support fund created to cover the added costs of delivery. There may be fewer students but they needed more support,” she continued.

In a typical year, colleges are allowed to keep 100 per cent of the national adult education budget funding if they achieve a threshold of at least 97 per cent of their allocation.

Last year this was lowered to 68 per cent owing to the impact of Covid-19, and with national lockdowns continuing, many in the sector thought a similar threshold would be implemented this year.

Situation still ‘difficult’ for colleges

Announcing the new threshold today, the ESFA said: “We acknowledge the situation is still difficult for providers, but our latest data shows that a threshold of 90 per cent is a fair representation of grant funded providers’ average delivery.

“We also know that many grant funded providers have been able to continue remote delivery very successfully during lockdown, having built on the experience of 2019 to 2020 to establish effective contingency arrangements to manage Covid-19 restrictions.”

“Our primary aim is to support providers to continue to deliver as much quality provision as possible, whether that is face-to-face, online, or otherwise remotely,” the update continued.

The agency said it would publish further details for colleges with any questions by the end of March.

And AEB funding rules for the 2020 to 2021 academic year will be updated in April to include this change.

The announcement today only applies to the national AEB administered by the ESFA, not devolved mayoral combined authorities which decide their own funding rules.

One in five colleges were allowed to keep close to one-third of their allocated adult education budget despite failing to deliver any courses for the funding last year, as previously revealed by FE Week.

The threshold only applies to colleges, not independent training providers which will continue to be paid only for what they deliver.

The DfE has failed to work the industrial strategy into the skills white paper

It looks like the Department for Education and the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy aren’t talking to each other, writes Graham Hasting-Evans

Do you remember the “industrial strategy”? Back in 2017 the government developed an overarching economic plan spanning up to 2027. From this has flowed a number of sector industry strategies. 

These industrial strategies, developed by the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, set out the impact that digitisation, artificial intelligence, changes in materials, new ways of working and green technologies would have on sectors.  

From these, significant changes were identified to develop the required skills in the UK’s workforce: both 16- to 19-year-olds doing traineeships, apprenticeships and T Levels, and also the 34 million in the workforce who need some form of re-skilling.  

But what currently is not at all clear is how these industrial strategies fit with the Skills for Jobs white paper proposals put forward by the Department for Education. It is very hard to find joined-up coherence between the two. 

‘Heavily academic Board’

Take the white paper’s proposed Skills and Productivity Board. The idea behind this board is to provide expert advice on skills mismatches and how to make sure the courses and qualifications on offer across the country provide the needs of the employers and help grow the economy. It is chaired by Stephen van Rooyen, chief executive at Sky in the UK and Ireland.  

Yet it is quite a heavily academic board. I am a fellow of the World Confederation of Productivity Science and in my experience, productivity improvements are achieved through a series of very practical day-to-day changes. It is hard to see how the very academic Skills and Productivity Board will relate to the practically focused industrial strategies developed by BEIS.

Of course, more detail may be yet to come – but the fact the industrial strategy is only mentioned once (in passing) in the white paper is already a cause for concern. Instead, the DfE has created a board without any practitioners on it, other than the chair, and that worries me. 

‘Skills improvement plans must be local’

We also need to ask how the industrial strategy is meant to connect at the local level to the Chambers of Commerce, which were set up as the respected voice of the business communities they represent more than 150 years ago, in some cases.  

The chambers have been tasked with making sure the white paper’s “local skills improvement plans” are implemented, which means they should help ensure colleges and providers match their courses to local employers’ needs.  

How can the chambers do this without knowing what industrial strategies the government has for different kinds of employers and sectors? 

Some chambers are very proactive on the local skills agendas, linking to other organisations such as the combined authorities, Local Enterprise Boards, Confederation of British Industry and Federation of Small Businesses. Others less so.

The DfE seems to have failed to realise that there is already a productivity plan out there

Even if the local skills improvement plans are properly linked up to the industrial strategies, I’m concerned the plans won’t have the flexibility to really respond to the local situation. 

We need to remember each area will start from a different place. In some areas, maths and English skills will be sufficient, but in other areas there might be major gaps in these basic employability skills.  

All areas will have different mixtures of large employers or small employers. Somewhere like Derby is focused on manufacturing, but if you go down to Devon it will be more concerned with tourism and hospitality.  

My worry is the local skills plans will be cast from a central template, and local people won’t have enough flexibility to really make them work and match up with local needs and sector-specific industrial strategies. The plans mustn’t be managed from the centre. 

Overall, the DfE seems to have failed to realise that there is already a productivity plan out there – it’s the industrial strategy. It’s been completely formulated, yet it appears they’ve not threaded it into the skills white paper. 

It looks like BEIS and the DfE aren’t working together. The DfE must think again, and bring the industrial strategies into the heart of the FE white paper.

Public sector apprenticeship target restated for extra year

The public sector apprenticeship target is to continue for an extra year as the majority of bodies in scope struggle to hit the 2.3 per cent starts aim.

The Department for Education revealed on Friday it will be amending legislation to set a new one-year target from 1 April 2021 to 31 March 2022.

The original target, set under powers from the Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Act 2009, runs from 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2021 and mandates public sector bodies with 250 employees or more to start 2.3 per cent of new employees as apprentices over that four-year period.

The target encompasses schools, local authorities, central government and their arms-length bodies, NHS organisations, the armed forces, and emergency services.

The department told FE Week this new one-year target, which will stay at 2.3 per cent but will not count previous years’ performance, “demonstrates the government’s continued focus on delivering more apprenticeships in the public sector”.

Public bodies fail to hit target

Official DfE statistics published earlier this year shows most public sector bodies have so far failed to meet that bar over the first three years of the target, with an overall average of just 1.7 per cent between April 2017 and April 2020.

The police performed the poorest, with just 0.7 per cent over that period; followed by schools, with one per cent.

Best performing, by miles, was the only sector the meet the target – the armed forces, with 7.9 per cent.

The target only became a requirement for schools in March 2019. FE Week’s sister paper FE Week reported that year how schools were facing difficulties recruiting apprentice teachers.

This has been blamed on the high costs of training and employment, and ministers’ insistence apprentice teachers be supervised in the classroom, and that the profession remain exclusively for graduates.

Education and training apprenticeships, which include teacher and teaching assistant programmes, saw 5,610 starts in 2017/18, rising to 7,890 by 2019/20.

Target progress must be ‘easily accessible’

The guidance from the DfE which revealed the target extension also confirmed relevant public bodies would be still expected to publish their progress towards the target to the department.

The bodies will also have to publish their progress publicly, to “enable the government, the public, and wider stakeholders to understand each body’s headcount and the number of apprentices they employ”.

This information must be “easily accessible to the public, for example on the internal and external facing website of a public sector body in scope,” the guidance reads, as previous guidance on the target has said.

FE Week uncovered last October how scores of multi-academy trusts, councils and hospital trusts had failed to publicise what percentage of their staff had started an apprenticeship in 2019-20 on their websites by the September deadline.

At the time, the DfE appeared to be easing off mandating bodies to publish their guidance, saying it was simply “good practice” to do so.

Under this new guidance, public bodies have six months after the end of the target period to send their data to the DfE and make it public.

This is why we need an Association of Apprentices

Apprentices are often isolated from their peers, and a mentoring and networking service can help reduce drop-out, writes David Marsh

At the start of this month the Association of Apprentices was launched ̶ a membership organisation aimed at providing apprentices with a stronger support and guidance network.  

While the Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education is a government organisation, set up to design new apprenticeship programmes, this is a group for apprentices themselves.   

Despite organisations existing for university students, such as the National Union of Students, a community for apprentices has not properly existed until now ̶ an observation that highlights the need to improve parity between higher and further education. 

As a group, apprentices are particularly in need of support from their peers – a community where they can share similar experiences and encourage greater buy-in and engagement.  

It is also support that not all apprentices have access to. When apprentices go to large organisations they will often have a community of apprentices around them, but those in SMEs and other smaller businesses may be on their own.  

‘Input from the Apprentice Council’

The Association is the brainchild of Sir Peter Estlin, the former Lord Mayor of London, and Jason Holt, the chair of the Apprenticeship Ambassador Network, an employer-led body sponsored by the Education and Skills Funding Agency. Both sit on its board.  

The other founding partners include the BBC, Blenheim Chalcot, Salesforce, Royal Mail, NHS, exam board NCFE and the organisation I lead, independent training provider Babington.  

Two apprentices from the organisation’s Apprentice Council will also become directors on the board, further amplifying the apprenticeship voice.  

The Apprentice Council has 30 apprentices, who will help design what the Association looks like going forward. The chair is Joel Roach, an apprentice with Microsoft, and the vice chair is Jasmine King, an apprentice with Flagship Group, a housing association.   

Over time, this network will grow and the more experienced apprentice members can start to support newcomers.   

‘Add value to apprenticeship offers’

The idea is to build geographical membership networks, so there would be an Association of Apprentices community in Leicester or in Bristol, for example, so that events can be hosted, just as events are held at universities. Our next event will be hosted by the BBC on April 12.  

Meanwhile, resources for careers advice and guidance will be created by the founding partners, and mentors will also be on hand to address any risks to engagement and drop-out.  

We want to encourage providers to understand more about the Association of Apprentices. Membership of the Association should add value to their programmes by offering a special forum for new apprentices, enhanced access to careers guidance and mentoring programmes.  

Meanwhile, the Council will help inform its evolving remit. The intention is not to be a lobbying organisation, but instead provide a robust support system for apprentices. That said, we will definitely be asking members for views and feedback and will share this as insight to support apprenticeships more broadly. 

‘Involve training providers properly’

Finally, it’s timely to reflect on what’s needed to create a strong skills system apprentices can flourish in. 

Employers play a vital role in FE, and are a central plank of the FE white paper. But while employers should absolutely be part of the future skills puzzle, it may be more apt to frame them as the brains, rather than the heart, of the FE system. 

LEPs and Chambers of Commerce also play an important role but they won’t necessarily want to be the delivery vehicle in the same way training providers can be. And employers won’t always have the expertise regarding the complex and wide range of funding streams.   

Further, three out of every four apprentices are trained by independent providers. But their role is significantly underplayed in the FE skills white paper, even though these providers have valuable frontline experience and the insight to support employers with their skills, training and recruitment decisions.   

Therefore, we must support employers by giving them the choice to work with the providers that best suit their strategic needs. 

Only then can we successfully deliver for young people – and apprentices especially.

Overworked staff need clear guidance around teacher-assessed grades this year

Staff don’t need to provide cartloads of evidence for teacher-assessed grades, just enough to form a professional judgment, says Jill Duffy

It is widely agreed that teachers and college leaders are facing an unprecedented workload.

Not only are you welcoming students back, identifying learning gaps and doing Covid testing, but results for your students taking key vocational qualifications (like our Cambridge Technicals) this summer will be based on teacher-assessed grades.  

Time and again when we listen to teachers and their teacher associations workload comes up as the headline issue.

The issue isn’t new, but with the impact of the pandemic there is a real question as to whether there are enough hours in a day to get everything done.

‘Consistent guidance needed’

It will come as no surprise that there are no simple “light touch” approaches to assessment – what we all do must meet the high bar needed to secure expectations of rigour and fairness for all students, regardless of the qualifications they are taking.

And much will, inevitably, fall to teachers and their colleges to exercise their professional judgment in generating teacher-assessed grades and to put in place the necessary quality assurance.

Nevertheless, it’s important you are supported with guidance that is clear, as consistent as possible across exam boards, and that meets regulatory demands.

We’re doing everything in our power to ensure that the guidance we produce will be simple and timely. So we are working to get guidance out to you about generating teacher-assessed grades for our Cambridge Technicals as well as our Cambridge Nationals next week.  

But at the same time, we can only go as fast as decisions are confirmed by policymakers and regulators. There is an Ofqual technical consultation about the vocational framework which closed just last week.

We can only go as fast as decisions are confirmed by policymakers and regulators

We know Ofqual is working hard to publish the outcomes next week, which is when we plan to publish fuller guidance on how grades for our key vocational qualifications will be arrived at.

‘Some tips for now’

But there are some things we think we can and should say now about Cambridge Technicals, our popular post-16 qualifications.

For students completing this year we will be asking for grades at qualification, not unit, level. This is a change from the approach we took in 2020 and should help to reduce your workload.

Our approach will be to allow you as much flexibility as possible, just as with A-levels, in identifying sufficient evidence by which to judge a student’s performance.

There is no requirement for the evidence to cover all of the content of a qualification. We don’t expect cartloads of evidence, virtual or otherwise  ̶  just enough, and no more, to inform a professional judgment.

The evidence you use can come from multiple sources and in different formats. For example, a recorded discussion would be viewed as a useful piece of evidence.

Your professional judgment will be supported by our performance descriptors, which indicate the level of performance required across the qualification.

There will also be no requirement to submit work for moderation. We are continuing to accept your requests for moderation of Cambridge Technicals units until March 29 and we will conduct virtual external moderation visits, where a college wishes, until the end of April.

We will allow teacher-assessed grades for your students who intended to complete a smaller qualification this year and have arrangements in place, so they can “top up” to a larger qualification next year.

‘Updates coming soon’

We will be asking you to submit your teacher-assessed grades to us by June 18 this year using the same grade submission system that we used in summer 2020. We’ll provide training, step-by-step guidance and FAQs as a refresher.

I hope this gives you some idea of the approach we will be taking and reassurance that we are committed to supporting you in the process of generating and submitting your teacher-assessed grades this summer.

Look out for our updates in the coming week. And we are, of course, always happy to hear your comments and concerns.

DfE knuckles rapped by stats watchdog over Skills Toolkit data

The Office for Statistics Regulation has reprimanded the Department for Education over the data published for its new Skills Toolkit.

The body, an arm of the UK Statistics Authority, wrote to the DfE’s chief statistician Neil McIvor earlier this month to raise issues with the figures.

OSR deputy director for regulation Mary Gregory expresses concern in the letter that the DfE is not clear that users of the toolkit could be coming from across the globe.

Skills Toolkit
The OSR’s letter to DfE (click to enlarge)

She also pulls the department up on its use of unpublished data about the Skills Toolkit in multiple parliamentary questions.

The DfE has now agreed to implement a series of improvements in the data’s publication and committed to following the statistics authority’s “Code of Practice” through its publication of “experimental statistics”. Compliance with the code is only a requirement for official statistics.

The letter follows multiple FE Week investigations which have led to the DfE admitting previous data claims were inaccurate.

Significant overcounting has led to revised estimates of “registration” claims in the published statistics which continue to include web hits and could be coming from anywhere in the world as the course providers do not filter for geographical locations.

Earlier this month, FE Week also revealed how some course “completions” were being counted when users spent three minutes looking at one of the online resources.

The course content has not been developed by the government, but more than £1 million has been spent to develop and promote the skills toolkit “platform”. It launched in April 2020 and consists of a web page on the National Careers Service with short course descriptions and links to the external websites.

The government says the free educational content being promoted aims to help people who are out of work to boost their digital and numeracy skills during the pandemic.

Education secretary Gavin Williamson described the free online courses as having a “transformational impact on so many people taking furlough” during a speech in October.

The DfE now publishes “experimental” Skills Toolkit data alongside its monthly apprenticeships and traineeships statistics release. The publication does point out the limitations of the data and makes clear that reporting of registrations and completions varies by each provider.

But it does not explain how the data for each course is counted, nor does it inform users of the geographical coverage.

 

‘We have been clear about the caveats and limitations of this data’

Responding to the OSR’s letter, a DfE spokesperson said: “The Skills Toolkit was set up in response to the pandemic to ensure people have the opportunity to learn new skills. Right from the beginning, we have been aware the providers that supply the courses apply different methods to collect and measure usage. 

“For these reasons we have published ‘experimental’ statistics which reflects the need to publish data while we seek to develop them further as we establish what data our users need. We have been clear about the caveats and limitations of this data. The UK Statistics Authority provides this designation of ‘experimental’ for exactly those purposes.”

The OSR says in its letter that the Skills Toolkit data is published under the “additional analysis section” of the publication which “may not be clear to users looking for these data in the release”.

It also acknowledges that the section provides users with “some of the limitations of the Skills Toolkit data”.

However, “not all limitations of the data are included. For example, they do not currently inform users of what the geographical coverage is,” the letter reads. “It is important to clearly explain the relevant limitations of the data and statistics to aid user understanding, and these should be regularly reviewed as the statistics are developed.”

The DfE spokesperson said they will implement “further improvements” to address these concerns in its next release.

MOVERS AND SHAKERS: EDITION 347

Your weekly guide to who’s new and who’s leaving.


Mushall Khan

Director of corporate operations, Learning Curve Group

Start date: March 2021

Previous job: Chief operating officer, Corndel

Interesting fact: At age 21, she planned and organised her sister’s wedding in Pakistan for 500 guests.


Iain Hatt

Principal, Wiltshire College and University Centre

Start date: August 2021

Previous job: Deputy principal for curriculum and quality, Wiltshire College and University Centre

Interesting fact: During the last 12 months, he has become a keen runner and is looking forward to completing his first marathon – once it is allowed.


Margaret Greenwood

Chair, All-Party Parliamentary Group for Adult Education

Start date: February 2021

Concurrent job: MP for Wirral West

Interesting fact: She previously worked as a teacher of English in secondary schools, FE colleges, and adult education settings, and as a basic skills tutor.


Andrew Slade

Principal, Oaklands College

Start date: August 2021

Previous job: College principal, South Thames College

Interesting fact: As a part-time sports psychologist, he has worked with a number of elite athletes, who have achieved national and international titles.