Providers have been given three weeks to bid for a contract in the government’s 16 to 18 traineeships “market entry exercise”.
The Education and Skills Funding Agency finally launched the opportunity today in a bid to rapidly ramp up the number of young people taking part in the pre-employment programme.
A deadline of 22 October has been set for applications. The agency intends for providers to start delivery from the beginning of December and run until 31 July 2022.
Contracts worth between £100,000 and £300,000 are available, with £30 million in total up for grabs.
The agency has launched the exercise in the face of poor engagement with the scheme, which comes despite a target from chancellor Rishi Sunak to triple the number of starts in both the 2020/21 and 2021/22 academic years backed with almost £250 million.
A progress report for the Sunak’s Plan for Jobs was published earlier this month and revealed there were 17,000 traineeship starts last year – 46 per cent of the government’s 36,700 target.
Ministers hope to achieve 43,000 starts on the scheme this year.
The ESFA was relying mainly on colleges with 16-to-19 study programme contracts to ramp up their traineeships delivery but has now conceded they need to expand the independent training provider market to achieve significant growth.
Officials have been promising a 16 to 18 traineeship market entry exercise all year but has been slow to get it off the ground. This is despite the agency running a procurement to expand the 19 to 24 traineeship provider base, although that was beset with delays.
To be eligible, providers must be rated by Ofsted as either ‘outstanding’ or ‘good’ and hold another ESFA contract for the 2021/22 academic year.
However, the agency said it will “consider existing traineeship providers that have a 19 to 24 traineeship 2021 to 2022 contract without an Ofsted grade one or two”.
Providers must not be in formal intervention, must not have been issued with a notice to improve, not be subject to an investigation for breach of contract and/or failed audit in the past three years, and not have a financial health grade of ‘inadequate’.
Jane Hickie, chief executive of the Association of Employment and Learning Providers said the opening of the market entry exercise is “incredibly welcome news”.
“If we are to have any hope of hitting the chancellor’s ambitious targets of trebling the number of participants on traineeships, it’s only right that independent training providers – who already have a great record of delivering 19+ traineeships – can support delivery at 16 to 18 too,” she added.
“The bid deadline is tight, so I would urge providers who are thinking of applying to do so quickly.”
The Department for Education has confirmed how FE and skills policies will be split between minister for higher and further education Michelle Donelan and the new minister for skills Alex Burghart.
This comes after FE Weekbroke the news Donelan would be adding further education to her universities remit, following Gillian Keegan’s move to the Department for Health during the reshuffle.
Donelan and Burghart released a statement last week confirming FE and skills policy would be run jointly between them.
The Department for Education has now confirmed which of them will be responsible for which policy area.
Donelan, who now attends cabinet as minister for higher and further education, will oversee the following:
strategy for post-16 education
higher technical education (levels 4 and 5)
further education funding and accountability
lifelong learning entitlement
Institutes of Technology and National Colleges
universities and higher education reform
higher education quality
student finance (including the Student Loans Company)
Burghart, in his first ministerial job as minister for skills, will look after:
further education providers including provider finances and workforce
T Levels and qualifications reviews (levels 3 and below)
apprenticeships including pre-apprenticeships
adult education, including the National Skills Fund and the UK Shared Prosperity Fund
Skills Accelerators and Industry Training Boards
careers education, information and guidance including the Careers and Enterprise Company
reducing the number of young people who are not in education, employment or training
student experience and widening participation in higher education
international education strategy including education exports and international students
Responsibility for post 16 strategy was previously shared between the skills minister and the universities minister, however that now sits solely with Donelan. The only responsibility they will share will be the response by universities, higher education institutions and further education to Covid-19.
Staff walkouts at three colleges have been abandoned after eleventh hour pay offers were received.
University and College Union strikes had been set to go ahead at 13 colleges across England from today, but that number has now reduced to 10.
The action has been suspended at City of Bristol College and New College Swindon after management made a late pay offer, which staff are “considering”, a UCU spokesperson said.
And strikes are completely off at Weymouth College after staff accepted an offer.
UCU said that if colleges want to avoid further disruption they need to “follow the lead of these colleges and get around the negotiating table”.
The union is demanding a pay increase of greater than 5 per cent to “close the school-college pay gap” which currently stands at £9,000, and after more than a decade of below inflation FE pay increases.
Despite this demand, staff at Weymouth College voted to end strike action after receiving a 2.2 per cent back-dated pay award.
A Weymouth College spokesperson said: “A 2 per cent pay award for all staff had been part of Weymouth College budget planning since January 2021 and the college was pleased to award this in July 2021 (at 2.2 per cent) backdated to April 2021.
“The Weymouth College members have voted to accept this final award. The UCU have advised that the dispute with Weymouth College is now settled and there will be no industrial action taken in relation to it. The college has met regularly with both local and regional UCU representatives and has maintained honest, open and transparent discussions.”
City of Bristol College, New College Swindon and the UCU were not able to divulge the pay offers currently on the table that have suspended strikes because negotiations are ongoing.
Rich Harris, principal of City of Bristol College, said: “City of Bristol and UCU are in ongoing and constructive discussions. Union colleagues have suspended the strike action that was due to take place on 28 September to allow for further consultation.”
A spokesperson for New College Swindon said the college was “pleased that UCU have suspended strike action” and hope that this “damaging dispute” can be “brought to an end through agreement on a range of matters such as pay harmonisation and family friendly flexibilities to support wellbeing”.
FE Week reported last week that strikes scheduled for this month at Sheffield College and City College Plymouth had also been called off following last-minute pay agreements.
Today’s strike is the first of up to 10 days of walk outs in this latest wave of UCU industrial action over pay.
Staff at five of the 10 colleges will also be out on Wednesday, in a two day strike. Pickets are taking place at all affected colleges from 8am.
The dispute has arisen following a pay offer of 1 per cent from employer body, the Association of Colleges, in December 2020. The AoC said members could only offer that pay rise because of the unforeseen and “severe financial pressure” colleges were facing owing to the Covid-19 pandemic that has “forced many into deficit”.
UCU general secretary Jo Grady said: “College leaders are facing strike action and severe disruption because they have refused to negotiate on pay. If they want to avoid further disruption they need to follow the examples of Weymouth, Bristol and Swindon colleges and meaningfully negotiate on wages.”
Skills bootcamps for heavy goods vehicle drivers are hoped to be on the road by November, the government has revealed.
An “accelerated, light touch” procurement of providers to train 3,000 new drivers is expected to launch this week and close on 22 October.
Advertising the training, recruiting learners and starting provision will have to be done swiftly to “start onboarding by November to tackle the sector challenges”, according to a prior information notice published today, though all this is only an “indicative” timetable.
By comparison, it took the DfE six months to award providers with contracts to deliver skills bootcamps in areas like digital skills and construction after announcing the policy in September 2020.
Bootcamps will put learners through ‘full process’ to become HGV drivers
The new bootcamps are being set up after a lack of HGV drivers was blamed for weeks of distribution issues affecting businesses such as supermarkets and fuel stations.
The driver shortage has been attributed to the Covid-19 pandemic, Brexit, and poor conditions for drivers. Today’s notice says the aim of these bootcamps will be to “secure learners a more sustainable job and higher wages over time”.
Nadhim Zahawi
Announcing the bootcamps on Saturday, new education secretary Nadhim Zahawi said: “We are taking action to tackle the shortage of drivers by removing barriers to help more people to launch new well-paid careers in the industry, supporting thousands to get the training they need to be road ready.”
As well as the 3,000 drivers going through bootcamps, the government will also be using the adult education budget to train an extra 1,000.
Suppliers for this bootcamp tender “must deliver the full process from recruitment of learners, through the entire training and licensing process required to become an HGV driver,” the prior information notice reads.
As with existing skills bootcamps, courses will last 16 weeks and are for learners aged 19 or over. There must also be a guaranteed interview at the end of the programme for every participant.
Learners will be taught how to pass their “Cat C or Cat C and Cat C + E licences” – which allow an individual to drive a vehicle weighing more than 3.5 tonnes.
Providers will have to run practices and the tests for those licences, as well as training to use industry tachographs, for handling specific vehicles for certain employers, and any other training requested by employers. Providers will also need to medically assess learners.
DfE wants to provide ‘road ready’ drivers
A market engagement event is planned for 30 September where the DfE will discuss its plans to provide “road ready” drivers for employers.
Anyone interested in attending should email skills.bootcamps@education.gov.uk by 12.30pm on 29 September with the organisation name contact details and job titles for a maximum of two attendees.
The invitation to tender is planned to be published on the Jaggaer platform this week.
The prior information notice does not reveal how much this contract is worth in total.
Ministers have commissioned Ofsted to review skills bootcamps – but there will continue to be no full inspections of the flagship training scheme unless they become a “rolling programme”.
A thematic survey will look into the quality of education and the curriculum of the bootcamps, which last up to 16 weeks and are for adults aged over 19 who are either employed or unemployed. Skills bootcamps are one of the government’s key initiatives in its Plan for Jobs announced last year.
Ofsted’s survey will be based on methodology from their FE and skills inspection handbook. A spokesperson for the inspectorate said: “This approach will help us to understand and evaluate education and training provision, looking at developments nationally, and highlighting good practice as well as areas for improvement.”
Bootcamps could be routinely inspected if they are a rolling programme
FE Week revealed earlier this year, ahead of their national rollout in April 2021, that providers of skills bootcamps would not be subject to Ofsted inspections.
Instead, suppliers bidding to run the provision would need to evidence that training will be high quality, that it meets in-demand skill needs, and that they have their own “strong” quality assurance and continuous improvement processes in place.
The DfE confirmed today that skills bootcamps would only fall under the scope for routine inspection “if and when” they become a rolling programme with regular funding.
This is subject to funding of Ofsted, and comes as the bootcamps are still in wave two of their trailblazer stage, the DfE said.
Bootcamp contracts lasting up to three years were handed out in two lots, each worth £18 million, to suppliers across the country last year.
Over half of bootcamp providers not inspected
FE Week analysis has found 57 per cent, or 19, of the 33 bootcamp providers have neither had a full inspection by Ofsted, nor are they listed on the watchdog’s website as waiting for an inspection.
Those not covered by Ofsted inspections include local enterprise partnerships, a number of private companies delivering bootcamps, and the Liverpool City Region Combined Authority.
Ofsted has insisted the survey visits to providers will “not be the same as an inspection,” as they will only look at the provision and will not make judgements about the provider.
The results will be used to “build a national picture of how bootcamps are working,” and will be reported to the DfE. Survey visits will be carried out between December 2021 and March 2022, with a report set to be published in September 2022.
Skills bootcamps, in areas as varied as digital skills and construction, are one of the two pillars of the £2.5 billion National Skills Fund announced by prime minister Boris Johnson last year, along with the new level 3 entitlement.
The DfE announced over the weekend the bootcamp model would be used to train up 3,000 more heavy goods vehicle drivers, amid a national shortage.
The Department for Education is to spend up to £10 million on new Skills Bootcamps to “ease the risk of shortages” of HGV drivers.
In a package of measures announced on Saturday night, the government wants 3,000 new HGV drivers through the bootcamp route and a further 1,000 new drivers to be trained up through the adult education budget.
A lack of drivers has been blamed for a range of distribution issues across retail for several weeks, including in supermarkets and petrol forecourts. The pandemic, Brexit and chronic workforce issues are all believed to be contributing to the current crisis.
Other measures include drafting in Ministry of Defence examiners to boost driver testing capacity are also being announced today. The Department for Transport and the DVLA have said they will send a letter to 1 million HGV driving license holders to encourage those not currently working to get back in to the industry.
The new HGV driver Skills Bootcamps will include training for a Cat C or Cat C&E license, which is required to drive vehicles weighing over 3,500kg.
DfE also hope the apprenticeship route will help to alleviate the current labour shortage. According to their statement this evening, they have been working with the Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education to “boost the apprenticeships on offer for large goods vehicle drivers including by updating the current Large Goods Vehicle Driver apprenticeship and increasing its funding.”
“HGV drivers keep this country running. We are taking action to tackle the shortage of drivers by removing barriers to help more people to launch new well-paid careers in the industry, supporting thousands to get the training they need to be road ready.
Education Secretary Nadhim Zahawi
At the time of writing, there are 2 adverts for 9 HGV driver apprenticeship vacancies on the government’s Find an Apprenticeships service. Both offer the level 2 ‘Large goods vehicle driver C and E’ standard. To date, Skills Bootcamps are designed to be targeted at levels 3-5, though they do not have to contain qualifications.
Skills Bootcamps are funded from the £2.5 billion National Skills Fund and are currently only available in limited sectors; construction, digital, engineering and manufacturing, green skills and rail. Programmes run for up to 16 weeks and must be designed with a guaranteed job interview in an in-demand industry.
AELP’s chief executive Jane Hickie welcomed extra investment in Skills Bootcamps,
“Haulage shortages have been causing chaos across the country, so it’s great to see the Government taking decisive action.
“Getting 4000 new workers trained and into quality HGV careers is a good target. Independent training providers are ready to play their part in delivering this training and are uniquely equipped to respond with agility. AELP strongly welcome the continued rollout and investment in bootcamps. We believe these are a great mechanism for training and reskilling the workforce.”
Providers for current Skills Bootcamps were selected in two ‘waves’ of procurement exercises which began in January this year. A ‘pre-procurement information notice’ was issued by the Department for Education last week, 21 September, for a possible wave 3, but it is not yet known whether this relates to HGV bootcamps announced today.
Earlier this year, providers hoping to deliver Skills Bootcamps faced “worrying” delays in their tender outcomes, which DfE reasoned was due to the large volumes of bids received.
Shaid Mahmood has been an FE governor for 20 years. Now he’s launching a review of the work of the Association of Colleges
Across the road from where Shaid Mahmood grew up in Moss Side, inner-city Manchester, there was a Christian missionary man with whom his mum was good friends. He remembers coming home one day aged 11 with an envelope from school and handing it to his mum, who couldn’t read English. She crossed the road and handed it to her friend, who read it out to her.
“He said, ‘Oh, it’s your son’s school report’. Then he said, ‘Oh bloody hell, he’s really quite bright.’” Mahmood grins. “He advised her to push me, get additional lessons and get me to university.”
The new chair of the Association of Colleges, appointed in December last year, has a fire in his belly. It’s more under control these days, he says, but he describes early experiences of a kind that have driven him ever since. He was aware of being capable but was acutely reminded, in 1970s Britain, of the way he was perceived.
“I really, really enjoyed picking up books and learning, I enjoyed memorising things, I always liked working out how things worked. When my dad was rewiring the house, I’d take one of the electrical socket boxes and take it all apart and put it back together again.”
Aged seven, he was placed by teachers in a class with 11-year-olds for English, maths and science. At home, his dad was entrepreneurial and opened a corner shop, and also worked as a bus driver, and his mum was a sewing machinist.
But there were many assumptions at that time that “the sons of corner shop keepers become corner shop keepers,” explains Mahmood. “There was poverty and inequality, and a backdrop of quite racist attitudes. When you see your parents being abused in the street, being spat on, when you’re called names yourself… it kind of lit a fire in me. I wasn’t going to be second best to anyone.”
He has opened up recently to his own grown-up son about the circumstances he and his five younger siblings had to endure, so his son understands the family’s history. “Those kinds of things don’t leave you. It leaves an imprint on your soul.”
It could have gone wrong for Mahmood. He was in a boys’ gang in his neighbourhood, not one that robbed, but that scrapped with other boys. But at the heart of this, he explains, was a sense of community. “That’s just what you did. We protected each other, and of course we got into fights, but it was about being part of a neighbourhood.”
The strong sense of community (not the scrapping, evidently) came from his parents. While his mum ensured, in line with her friend’s advice, that he get extra maths and English lessons as well as Koran classes, both his parents were clear with him that he was expected to share those advantages around.
“My mother and father taught me, if you’ve got any kind of talent, it’s about what you do for others. So I did a lot of paperwork!” The young Mahmood could be found filling out citizenship forms and applications for school places, all in his little printed handwriting.
“That was inbred in me, that it’s about what you help others achieve.” He laughs, before growing serious: “I’d go and march, metaphorically speaking, for anyone! It really got my goat, when people said we wouldn’t amount to anything.”
At the end of school Mahmood had A-levels in biology, chemistry and general studies, and got a place at Lancaster University to study chemistry and later a masters in polymer science. He went on to a PhD in chemistry at Sheffield University, before landing a job at Dupont, the huge American chemicals company.
By his mid-20s, he was travelling the world, from the US to Belgium, France and Germany. “For a young lad out of Moss Side, it was…” he shakes his head, laughing.
A career highlight was his invention of a shorter and less dangerous process for producing a light-sensitive chemical used in the printing industry. From there, he managed teams and so entered the business of developing people.
Back in the UK, Mahmood decided to make the move a permanent one. “I changed tack and join the management team at a company commissioning services for young people,” he says. The company was none other than Connexions, the government-funded support service for students up to age 19, which was wound up in 2012.
But Mahmood was joining in 2003 and was soon director of a northern branch. From there, he landed a role as assistant director at Leeds city council for children’s services, and has worked at the council ever since, currently as a chief officer.
His energy is infectious. He does not, happily, at all fit the mould of a dusty governor at the back of the Christmas party sneaking the odd sandwich. His personal philosophy explains why: “I don’t like to do things half-baked, it has to be brilliant – it is a fault of mine. I hear this thing about ‘good enough is good enough’, but I’m just not sure.”
He leans forward. “My view is, as a parent, I want any institution to strain every single sinew to do the best for my child.” Just as his parents had taught him, Mahmood delivers a very hands-on version of giving back.
Mahmood at Leeds City College
He has held governance roles in FE for almost 20 years, including at Park Lane College, now called Leeds City College. By 2014 he was chair, but the college was in “dire financial straits” and Ofsted was breathing down their necks.
“You can’t do governance sat behind a desk,” asserts Mahmood. So he got stuck in, setting up working groups in English and maths chaired by governors themselves, to drive up standards. He got governors into classroom observations, to compare their findings with practitioners.
“Being on the board is not just about dotting the i’s and crossing the t’s. It’s about really providing leadership on where that kind of organisation needs to be.”
Mahmood is a rare governance expert in that he clearly spells out that governors are leaders within FE. They’re more often portrayed as guardians who hold the real leaders to account.
But Mahmood doesn’t see it that way. “I work with the chief executive and his team to drive the organisation forward. My views and thoughts and those of the board have influenced the strategy. If you asked my chief executive, I think he’d say we’ve navigated this through as a pair.” He grins again. “My job is not just to chair four or five meetings a year.”
My job is not just to chair five meetings a year
Whether all colleges are lucky enough to have such a hands-on, committed chair of governors is another question – but if they do, Mahmood is also clear they are too rarely recognised at a system level, and are at risk of being lost as a result.
“These are volunteers offering their time up, we have to remember that,” he points out. Also, he adds, unlike senior managers, he and most trustees are unlikely to move on after a few years because they don’t have to build a career. “The board members are often the ones who are still there after senior managers have gone.” As such, governors should be celebrated “as leaders of cultural change”.
Governors are leaders of cultural change
To recognise this, says Mahmood, more explicit mentions of governors in Ofsted reports would be welcome, as would policymakers listening more closely to governors for their “different perspective”, rooted as it is in industries, employers and communities outside the college gates.
But despite the frustration of under-recognition, Mahmood has a rallying call to all would-be governors, in his new position as chair of the Association of Colleges. The potential to lead, and make a significant impact, is greater than ever, he says.
“There’s never been a better time to start influencing local, regional and national policy. FE is definitely in the spotlight in a way I haven’t seen for quite some time. The FE white paper, the ‘levelling up’ agenda, the commission of the college of the future…”
To that end, Mahmood is positioning the AoC to be ready – to take stock of all the changes that have happened in the past 18 months, but also to look ahead.
So he and the board are calling for a review of the AoC’s work, he reveals. “It’s something myself, the board and [chief executive] David [Hughes] feel is the right thing to do. Just think what’s happened in the past 18 months: the white paper, Covid, a new interim chief executive at the ESFA, a new FE commissioner. It’s about looking at what we do, and how we can even better serve our members.”
Mahmood at Leeds City College
Mahmood is particularly interested in ‘strategic marketing’, which he describes as an “effective way of planning an approach to the future” from a “relationship management point of view”. One relationship he’s particularly keen to build is between FE and HE, both of which are “anchor institutions” for their areas, who can work “hand-in-hand to deliver community education”.
He’s also determined to support efforts to get more under-represented individuals into leadership in FE, so the attitudes that plagued him in his youth are robustly challenged. This is particularly important outside cities, he says, where communities may never see a community leader from a minority ethnic background.
Well, he’s almost made me want to sit on a trustee board, so I can’t think of a better marketeer to encourage more people in. Mahmood turns to me again, eyes shining. “It has never been a better time to be a chair of governors in a college.”
Learners are sometimes being wrongly labelled as sexually aggressive, writes Jennifer Wilkinson
Teaching in the 21st century is no small feat. Not only are we now educators, the list of “professional responsibilities” just keeps growing.
One of the hot topics in FE at the moment is sex. Now I know what you’re thinking: yes, sex has always been a hot topic.
But for most young people education is their first real experience of an institution and of a community. As such, it is only natural that colleges become the pitch upon which many issues play out on a micro-scale.
And in the post-Savile/Weinstein era, inappropriate sexual behaviour has now become a pressing professional responsibility for teachers. Although this heightened awareness has many benefits, it also has its drawbacks.
That’s particularly the case for learners with autism and complex learning difficulties.
When lecturers are faced with, let’s face it, the uncomfortable situation of confronting sexually inappropriate behaviour, our instinct can be to communicate the severity of the situation to the student in question.
In schools, there are now zero-tolerance policies on any sexually inappropriate behaviour, including revenge porn, sexting, physical acts or unwanted attention.
Of course, actions must have consequences. If history has taught us anything, it is that we cannot just ignore the problem.
However, what do you do when the student does not fully understand their actions? Is the hard-line approach really the best solution?
A fashionable colleague once told me a story about working one-to-one with a student with complex needs. She just so happened to be wearing sparkly-glitter tights.
While she was reading the student’s work, he began to run his hands up her leg, under her skirt. Naturally, she screamed and jumped out of her seat.
When she asked the student why he’d done it, he said, “I wanted to see what the tights felt like and if the glitter went all the way up.”
The student said ‘I wanted to see what the tights felt like’
It was not meant as an act of sexual aggression, nor to harm the teacher. The student simply saw something sensorily interesting.
Students with autism and learning difficulties are at risk of being labelled “sexually inappropriate”, “sexualised” or “sexually abusive” because of the lack of understanding within colleges of how to deal with difficult events constructively.
These labels can be highly destructive, often making it more challenging for students to express sexuality in a healthy way.
Recently, a male student with learning difficulties made inappropriate advances towards a female student on his vocational course.
She felt extremely uncomfortable and understandably stopped speaking to him.
However, he did not understand why, nor did he feel able to speak to staff to help him navigate a very complicated social situation.
The boy became labelled and isolated from his peers on his course. He did not fully comprehend how his behaviour had caused this complex situation or affected others.
He eventually dropped out of college altogether. The support available to him came too little, too late.
Between 20 to 30 per cent of convicted sexual offenders are “estimated to have learning disabilities or difficulties”, according to a study published in the Journal of Sexual Aggression in 2007.
We also know crimes by those with learning difficulties and autism tend to be impulse-based – trigged by curiosity as opposed to seeking sexual gratification.
But this cohort has a higher rate of detention and prosecution than the average population (Craig & Hutchinson, 2005).
Educators should not be put in a situation where hard-line responses are all we have, because mental health support has been outsourced to a phone number due to budget cuts.
So, we desperately need the government to employ more professionally trained counsellors in colleges, who can focus on early intervention and prevention of escalating behaviour.
I am a teacher, not a professional counsellor. My job is to preserve the student-teacher relationship and maintain an environment where any student can learn.
The departing skills minister did well to lead in a pandemic but was too college-focused, writes Jane Hickie
There is no doubt that Gillian Keegan brought prominence to the FE agenda as minister for apprenticeships and skills. Indeed, she was the first former apprentice to hold the office.
Leading on the FE white paper and the Skills and Post-16 Education Bill, was no mean feat in just 19 months in post, never mind during a global pandemic. Keegan should be congratulated for her leadership during this time.
We at AELP welcomed many aspects of the white paper, not least the outcomes-focused, employer-led approach to skills. However, we have concerns that cannot be ignored.
The skills Bill’s focus on greater protection of learners and apprentices is not only reasonable but sensible. But we are concerned about the proposed “list of relevant providers”.
No consultation has taken place on the conditions, and the government itself acknowledges that this could mean “significant costs” being imposed on smaller providers delivering niche provision.
Keegan and her team could have listened and done more to ensure providers will not be saddled with more bureaucracy and unnecessary costs. The focus needs to be on post-pandemic recovery for both learners and providers.
We also have concerns about how local skills improvement plans will articulate the needs of all learners, providers and employers, and avoid duplication at a local level.
The extension of the Baker Clause was a really positive aspect of the white paper, so it was disappointing not to see this included in the Bill.
So now we welcome the new minister, Alex Burghart, and urge him to take these concerns on board.
One thing he could do is listen to the whole sector. I had a good working relationship with Keegan and she was always happy to meet with our members.
But many providers felt she was incredibly college-focused, rather than understanding and listening to providers of all types.
This may well have impacted her decision-making, particularly the government’s continued agenda to reduce the number of providers delivering.
Instead, we need a whole-system approach that values providers of all types.
Independent training providers should not be pigeon-holed as only delivering apprenticeships and at lower levels. Nor should there be disappointing insinuations from within government about the quality of provision.
There shouldn’t be disappointing insinuations about the quality of provision
The vast majority of ITPs are judged good or outstanding by Ofsted – 81 per cent at the latest count.
There is no doubt that the chancellor’s support of apprenticeships and traineeships throughout the pandemic, and the Plan for Jobs, has been a game-changer for learners, businesses and providers.
I have no doubt that Keegan championed this agenda and secured key funding for the sector. However, these financial incentives (which come to an end on 30 September) must be extended.
This is crucial if we are to have any hope of tackling disadvantage, getting young people into training and work and narrowing the skills gap exacerbating workforce shortages.
Burghart, as a former teacher and lecturer, will have a decent understanding of the sector and our challenges. His challenge over the coming months will be steering the Bill through the House of Commons ̶ keeping what’s good, while hopefully addressing our key concerns.
He should also be ready to come out fighting for additional FE funding as part of the spending review. It will be a bunfight, and we need the voice of FE to be heard loud and clear.
There must be long-term financial sustainability of the apprenticeships programme, support for SME apprenticeships, an ongoing suite of support for young people and entry-level apprentices, and fairer funding for maths and English functional skills.
This would put apprenticeships on a sustainable footing and offer parity between academic and vocational education.
We are ready and waiting to support the new minister’s ambitions. I would urge Burghart to listen ̶ really listen ̶ to the sector.