Skills devolution spreads with plan for six new regions

The number of people covered by devolved skills budgets is set to increase rapidly with six new potential regions announced last week.

The regions were placed on the government’s “devolution priority programme” with a view to taking control of an adult skills budget after local mayors are elected in 2026.

If all six go ahead it is estimated only 20 per cent of England’s population will live in non-devolved areas.

The number of authorities with local control of skills budgets was already due to double to 20 by 2026, under devolution deals agreed under the previous government.

A total of 26 will operate if the latest deals succeed for Cumbria, Cheshire and Warrington, Norfolk and Suffolk, Greater Essex, Sussex and Brighton, and Hampshire and the Solent.

Devolved funding distribution

The amount of money each devolved area gets is based on the number of learners living in that region in the 2017-18 academic year, the year before skills devolution began.

This formula has remained unchanged for the last seven years.

It means regions housing 43 per cent of the population receive 60 per cent of the adult education budget.

A DfE spokesperson did not respond when asked if the formula will be reviewed or updated.

They also declined to share the 2017-18 learner numbers broken down by region, arguing the information cannot be published as it has not been collated or quality assured.

In the next two years, the portion of adult education funding devolved to local areas is set to grow from 60 per cent (about £828 million) to at least 70 per cent.

This figure could be higher but skills budgets are not yet available for Buckinghamshire.

This summer, York and North Yorkshire, the East Midlands and Cornwall will begin commissioning a combined budget of £73 million.

Next year seven more authorities will be handed control.

The Labour government’s approach to devolution, outlined in its recent white paper, may also result in delays to some of the deals struck under the Conservatives.

The white paper makes clear the government prefers local and combined authorities led by directly elected mayors, who can “use their mandate for change to take difficult decisions”.

Areas such as Surrey previously agreed to a deal that did not involve becoming a mayoral combined authority, but have now indicated they want to reorganise their 11 council areas into a “simpler” system.

There are also ongoing discussions for Devon and Torbay, which already has a non-mayoral devolution deal, joining forces with Plymouth City Council and possibly Cornwall.

Ringfencing dismantled

The white paper also set out rules on gradually increasing flexibilities the devolved areas will have over spendings.

This year, “trailblazer” combined authorities Greater Manchester and West Midlands have been granted “integrated” financial settlements that allow full flexibility over how to spend adult skills funding.

This includes being able to transfer up to 10 per cent of funding between spending areas including skills, transport and housing, and up to 10 per cent across different years.

Until now, portions of funding were ringfenced for specific purposes, such as free courses for jobs and skills bootcamps.

The white paper set out a consistent framework for future devolution, with Greater Manchester and West Midlands now classed as ‘established mayoral strategic authorities’.

Liverpool City Region, West Yorkshire, South Yorkshire and the North East will follow in 2026.

Authorities only classed as ‘mayoral strategic authorities’ will not be eligible for integrated settlements, but will see ringfencing of their adult education funding pots stop from 2026-27.

‘Foundation strategic authorities’, the lowest level of devolved authority which lack directly elected mayors, will continue to be subject to ringfencing for adult education funding.

No answers for failed T Level students in re-mark fiasco

A college and awarding body have been locked in a row for six months after only one student passed a niche T Level.

Nine out of 10 learners taking the control and instrumentation engineering and manufacturing specialism in the 2022-23 academic year were initially given high marks by Middlesbrough College, worthy of at least a pass.

But nine then received an ‘unclassified’ grade when results day came around in August following moderation by City & Guilds.

The college challenged the marking “disparity”, arguing that the awarding body’s assessment was “not an accurate reflection” of students’ work and skill level.

But one outraged parent, who raised the alarm with FE Week after struggling to find answers for six months, said her son had almost turned his back on education after suffering a 55-mark downgrade.

Eleanor Hutchinson said her son now worked part-time in a food factory and added: “He’s disillusioned and he’s hurt – he thinks he’s let everyone down.”

Middlesbrough College said it was pursuing “all formal re-mark and complaints processes” with City & Guilds.

Meanwhile, the awarding body said there were “processes in place to support learners in situations such as this and we have ensured these are available and are being followed”.  

Most of the nine failed students received a ‘partial achievement’ in their overall T Level after scoring ‘unclassified’ in their specialism. They were part of the first and only group in England to take the assessment last summer.

The fiasco came to light amid the retendering process for the design and delivery of the maintenance, installation and repair for engineering and manufacturing T Level.

City & Guilds has held the contract, worth £3 million, since 2020 and rolled it out as part of wave three in 2022. Licences for these T Levels are up for renewal this spring. It is unclear whether City & Guilds will bid to develop the next version of the qualification.

The awarding body opted not to bid for two other T Level contracts from wave one, which retendered last year. One of those, onsite construction, was scrapped by the government in December.

Middlesbrough row

Ms Hutchinson said her son received 78 out of 90 from a Middlesbrough College assessor, placing him in the highest band, but a City & Guilds’ moderator cut the final mark to 23.

He was one of the ‘control and instrumentation’ students to receive a ‘partial achievement’, which is awarded where a learner completes their industrial placement but does not pass either the core or occupational specialism components. 

The student does not get a certificate but can get UCAS points based on their grade in the component they passed.

Ms Hutchinson said her son – who has the equivalent of a ‘D’ in a single A-level – had not been told by his college or City & Guilds why their respective marks were so different.

A college spokesperson said while “teething problems” with qualifications and “staff shortages” in this particular skill area were not uncommon, it is believed the marking disparity is a unique issue.

They added: “We have been in extensive communication with City & Guilds since August, including pursuing all formal re-mark and complaints processes, and we have had direct communication with the chief executive of City & Guilds, including during the last seven days.”

Failed students have been offered “extensive support” and some have moved on to apprenticeships or higher technical qualification courses, the college said.

But the spokesperson added: “This does not take away the frustration and disappointment they must be feeling with both the result and the time taken to try and resolve this matter.

“We can only apologise and reassure them that we are pursuing every avenue in an effort to obtain a satisfactory resolution.”

City & Guilds said: “We are continuing to support the centre in their future delivery of these important qualifications.”

Middlesbrough College had 64 learners on the T Level maintenance, installation and repair for engineering and manufacturing route who were assessed last year.

Including the control and instrumentation specialism students who only received a ‘partial achievement’, the college’s pass rate was 79 per cent, against a national pass rate of 82 per cent.

Awarding troubles

Other awarding bodies have experienced T Level problems. Ofqual issued a £300,000 fine to NCFE for major failings in its 2022 health and science assessments.

The government is injecting more cash into second-generation T Level contracts amid concerns the first contracts forced awarding bodies to work at a loss.

Despite the shaky start in the rollout of some T Levels, the previous government sought to scrap overlapping BTECs and other level 3 courses in a bid to boost low T Level uptake.

Following a “short review” under Labour, the level 3 courses have been given a temporary stay of execution until 2027.

MOVERS AND SHAKERS: EDITION 487

Jon Laud

Assistant Principal (Curriculum Innovation), Nottingham College

Start date: January 2025

Previous Job: Assistant Principal, SMB College Group

Interesting fact: Jon’s background is in TV production, working on shows such as Emmerdale and Countdown. His first work experience was on an Ant and Dec Christmas special! He also appeared on the Jerry Springer show, but fortunately, not as a guest!

Paddy Bradley

Chair, Wiltshire College and University Centre

Start date: January 2025

Previous Job: Former CEO, Swindon and Wiltshire Local Enterprise Partnership

Interesting fact: Paddy was awarded an MBE in 2023 for services to the community and economy of Wiltshire after he helped bring in millions of pounds in government funding to the county’s infrastructure through his leadership at SWLEP.

Apprenticeships behind bars follows open jail failure

Higher-security jails are testing a new apprenticeship model after a scheme run in open prisons failed, FE Week can reveal.

Data obtained through a Freedom of Information request shows the open prison scheme had just 10 prisoner apprentices since its launch in September 2022.

Officials had aimed to recruit 300 prisoners from England’s 13 open prisons by 2025, meaning the target was missed by 97 per cent.

To boost take-up, the government is now trialling apprenticeships with inmates nearing release in closed prisons, with the work element of the training kept within prison walls. 

The qualifications will be completed once the inmate is released.

The MoJ told FE Week that closed prison apprentices are paid £4 per week as directed by the prisoner rates of pay. Meanwhile, prisoners in open prisons allowed to do their apprenticeship on day release are paid the minimum apprentice wage which starts at £6.40 an hour. 

An MoJ spokesperson said: “Getting former offenders into stable work helps cut crime and makes our streets safer. That’s why we are committed to expanding apprenticeship opportunities and are working with employers to increase participation and steer even more offenders away from a life of crime.”

But experts say serious reform in the prison estate is needed for the scheme to succeed.

Jon Collins, chief executive of the Prison Education Trust, said: “Enabling people to successfully complete an apprenticeship in overcrowded and understaffed prisons will have been a real challenge.

“But apprenticeships have the potential to provide a route into sustainable employment and to reduce reoffending, so prisons should make every effort to increase the number of people accessing them and provide the consistent support needed to complete them.” 

Prison overcrowding 

The government amended the law in 2022 to help prisoners access paid work outside of prison as they near the end of their sentences.

In its first year, the scheme was offered in a small number of open prisons to 100 prisoners eligible for release on temporary licence. Apprenticeships included level 2 supply chain warehouse operative and level 2 production chef standards.

Since early 2024, the MoJ has tested the model in the full open estate, consisting of 13 open prisons that can hold over 6,000 men, and more recently in two unnamed closed prisons.

It is also working with New Futures Network, a specialist branch of HM Prison and Probation Service, that connects prisons with employers to fill vacancies.

The government said it was considering shorter duration and foundation apprenticeships to assess their suitability for prisoners and maximise uptake.

Novus and Total People, part of LTE Group, were the first providers involved in the pilot in open prisons, which resulted in two Novus apprenticeship completions in hospitality. Both are involved in this second pilot.

In recently submitted evidence to the justice committee on an inquiry into prisoner reoffending, Novus said prison apprenticeships were an example of best practice in promoting rehabilitation.

“We have overcome early challenges as the programme developed, and are keen to expand this provision,” the evidence said.

Peter Cox, managing director of Novus, said: “Novus’ priority is to support as many prisoners as possible into sustained employment upon release to help reduce reoffending and drive economic growth, and we work with dozens of employers across the country to find work placements and opportunities for learners.”

Heather Akehurst, chief executive of Open Awards, which offers Access to HE diplomas in prisons, echoed Collins’ concerns.

“Prisoners get moved between prisons at very short notice due to overcrowding and particular tensions within settings,” she warned.

“One of the first things that gets lost is prison education, because it is easier to say, ‘No, we’re not going to move them to the training wing today, and we’re not going to supervise’.”

“I think this [scheme] should keep going,” Akehurst added. “I think you’re going to see a big drive in education including apprenticeships, but you’re going to have to fix the prison estate first, so the drive is possibly 18 months behind.”

Come clean on cuts, demand adult education providers

Urgent clarification has been demanded on adult education budget cuts after an announcement to metro mayors sparked confusion in England’s non-devolved areas.

Last week, FE Week revealed combined authority mayors were told to expect a reduction in skills budgets of 2 to 3 per cent for the 2025-26 academic year.

But Caroline McDonald, chief executive of Holex, said the news caused “widespread confusion and frustration” as providers funded by central government had received “no communication whatsoever”.

HOLEX, which represents adult education providers including local authorities, has sent a letter to education secretary Bridget Phillipson calling on her to “review and reconsider” the cuts.

McDonald called the Department for Education’s approach “fragmented” as although some mayors have kept providers in their areas informed, others remain in the dark.

This is causing “operational uncertainty” and “undermining the confidence” of providers, the chief executive added.

The budget cuts come as the UK shared prosperity fund drops 40 per cent to £900 million in April, and the three-year adult numeracy programme Multiply ends.

Community learning impact

Kent and Essex county councils, which have the largest national local authority adult learning budgets in the country, both said they had yet to receive specific details about budget reductions.

A spokesperson for Kent County Council, which is predicting a 3.3 per cent cut to its £8.7 million annual budget, said there was “significant demand” from residents seeking to improve their education, training and skills.

They added: “Any cuts planned by the Education and Skills Funding Agency will see a significant reduction in the number of courses we will be able to provide from August.

“Fewer courses mean fewer residents able to develop their education and skills, limiting their employment prospects and impacting their personal development and wellbeing.”

Mayors’ warning

About 60 per cent of England’s adult education budget is devolved to mayors.

It is understood the DfE sends mayors informal letters each January outlining how much they are likely to receive.

This resulted in mayoral officials warning providers in their regions they should prepare for reductions of 2 to 3 per cent.

England’s main adult education budget, the adult skills fund, amounts to about £1.4 billion this year.

The money – which focuses on employability skills but also includes broader ‘tailored learning’ – is handed out to FE colleges, independent training providers and local authorities.

FE Week estimates the cuts planned in the next academic year would save the DfE £30 million.

The Office for Budget Responsibility had previously said the government’s spending plans involved a 1.1 per cent cut each year in unprotected budget areas, including further education and skills, from 2025-26.

This follows two decades of budget reductions, with total public spending on adult classroom-based learning falling from £5.1 billion in the early 2000s to £1.7 billion in 2023-24, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies.

In the same period, the number of publicly funded qualifications taken by adults in England has fallen from 5.6 million to 2.3 million, with level 1 and below suffering the steepest decline.

‘Economically illiterate’

Leaders in the FE sector have argued spending cuts contradict the government’s commitment to “driving economic growth”.

A lack of investment in skills, both from the public and private sector, is understood to be a key driver of persistent job vacancies, a low national productivity rate and a reliance on migration in some sectors.

Association of Colleges chief executive David Hughes said: “We know the DfE is under financial pressure and this cut is presumably part of a wider package of measures DfE is having to take to make its books balance. 

“The sooner that package is communicated, the better. With the spending review due in June, our concern is what this might indicate for all post-16 funding for the next few years.”

Former North of Tyne mayor Jamie Driscoll, who oversaw a £23 million adult skills budget, called cuts to adult education “economically illiterate”. 

He said: “The government keep banging on about growth, then cut skills training – when the number one barrier to growth is finding skilled workers.

“The axe will fall on all the courses that help the hardest to reach get into employment.”

Short isn’t sweet for apprenticeship standards warning

Shortening the minimum time to complete an apprenticeship to eight months risks pushing England further adrift of other leading nations, ministers have been warned.

The government this week confirmed it will reduce the current 12-month minimum duration by four months from August “subject to the legislative timetable”.

Three “trailblazer apprenticeships” in key shortage occupations have been chosen to “pioneer” the new approach, with apprentices in green energy, healthcare and film/TV production set to be the first to take them.

The Department for Education said this change means apprentices will “achieve occupational competence more quickly, where that makes sense, for example because they have significant prior learning, or their industry works to a different rhythm”.

Ben Rowland, chief executive of the Association of Employers and Learning Providers, said the reform “should help learners and employers access priority skills needed to boost their careers and boost their industry at shorter notice”.

He added: “Time served is not a measure of quality, and apprenticeships will still be substantial training programmes where apprentices will need to evidence full occupational competency, but the flexibility allows providers and employers to lean into different delivery models that enable accelerated learning.”

But Stephen Evans, who heads up the Learning and Work Institute, warned that “lowering standards” in this way, coupled with reforms to functional skills requirements, was a “mistake” and only gives the “false illusion” of increasing opportunity.

In technical education-leading countries like Germany, apprenticeships last at least two years but usually run for between three and four years.

And the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) recently pointed out that general education in apprenticeships in England is limited to functional skills courses typically lasting around 100 hours in total. That compares to 400 hours in Switzerland, around 480 hours in Germany, and 588 hours in Norway.  

The 12-month minimum duration rule was introduced in 2012 after some employers and providers were accused of cutting corners by running apprenticeships in as little as 12 weeks, which led to a BBC Panorama investigation called The Great Apprentice Scandal.

Evans said: “England is already an outlier compared to other countries with shorter apprenticeships and far less general education like English and maths. Lowering standards in this way will increase this disparity and only gives the false illusion of increasing opportunity. 

“If training doesn’t require 12 months, it can still be valuable but isn’t necessarily an apprenticeship. 

“Apprenticeships should prepare people for future careers, which will increasingly need good English and maths. We should invest to make that work, or risk limiting opportunity and growth.”

Short standards

The three apprenticeship standards chosen to introduce the first shorter-length apprenticeships are: level 2 dual fuel smart meter installers, level 2 healthcare support workers, and level 3 production assistants screen and audio.

Healthcare support worker is the most popular standard of the three, with 1,160 starts in academic year 2023-24, but attracts the lowest funding with a £3,000 maximum. It currently has a 12-month minimum duration.

Production assistant apprentices currently have a “typical” duration to gateway of 15 months and dual fuel smart meter installers is listed as taking 14 months. They attract maximum funding of £9,000 and £12,000 respectively.

The DfE told FE Week it would not reduce the funding bands for these standards when they’re delivered over a shorter duration.

The department added that one of Skills England’s first orders of business will be to identify which other apprenticeships would be best served by the shorter duration approach.

Federation of Small Businesses executive director Craig Beaumont said shorter apprenticeships “should help SME employers fill skills gaps faster”.

Make apprenticeship funding top priority, poll suggests

Public opinion favours spending on apprenticeships above all other education sub-sectors, polling shared exclusively with FE Week has revealed.

A Public First survey of over 2,000 UK adults saw 48 per cent put apprenticeships at the top of their wish list for the government’s spending review – above childcare, school and university funding.

But it revealed a perception that apprenticeships are difficult to secure, with people in all areas bar London reporting this was a problem for young people.

The poll assessing public attitudes to apprenticeships also found 44 per cent of the 566 parents involved in the survey would prefer their children went to university instead, while 40 per cent favoured apprenticeships.

Labour, in opposition, vowed to transform the current apprenticeship levy – a tax on large employers that funds the whole apprenticeship system – into a “growth and skills levy” that also funds other forms of training. However, the extent of its reform hinges on what the government decides in June’s spending review.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves has already warned she will make “difficult decisions” to solve an alleged £22 billion public finance black hole and reportedly told the Department for Education to find £1 billion in savings before the autumn Budget.

Skills minister Jacqui Smith told the Financial Times this week that businesses would only be able to use money raised through the levy for traditional apprenticeships in the “short term”.

She said the government’s ability to allow levy funds to be used for non-apprenticeship training would depend on how much funding the DfE receives at the spending review.

The apprenticeship levy is set to generate over £4 billion this year, yet the Treasury only gives the DfE a ring-fenced budget of £2.7 billion to spend on apprenticeships in England, while the devolved administrations of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland receive around £500 million between them.

This leaves a Treasury margin of at least £800 million.

Mike Crowhurst, director for skills at Public First, said: “Investing more in apprenticeships and skills training is a clear priority for parents and the wider public, even if they would still marginally prefer their own children to go university.

“The decline in apprenticeships on offer to young people is also cutting through across the country. As we head into a challenging spending review, boosting apprenticeships and skills would be both smart policy and politics from the government.”

Survey says

The survey results showed 48 per cent of UK residents want the government to prioritise funding for apprenticeships, followed by 40 per cent wanting more cash for adult training, and 31 per cent for both childcare/early years provision and secondary schools.

Funding for universities came bottom of the priority list, with 23 per cent of respondents choosing this option.

Less than a third (31 per cent) said they would consider doing an apprenticeship themselves, while 86 per cent of parents said they would support a decision by their child to take an apprenticeship.

However, when asked to choose between their preference of their child going to university or taking an apprenticeship, more parents favoured the degree path.

The poll highlighted generational differences – 53 per cent of 25 to 34-year-old parents were more likely to want their children to pursue university, while 67 per cent of over-65 parents chose apprenticeships.

There was also a regional divide among people’s perceptions of how easy it is to find an apprenticeship.

In England, the worst area was Yorkshire, where 51 per cent of adults thought it was difficult to find an apprenticeship, followed by 50 per cent of adults in the East Midlands.

London was the only region where poll respondents were more likely to say young people found securing an apprenticeship easy rather than difficult, with 47 per cent saying there was no problem.

But official DfE data shows London had the lowest rate of starts (612) per 100,000 population for the 2023-24 academic year in the whole country.

Faster apprenticeship payments to providers as DfE ditches duplicate data

A new single apprentice registration system will “significantly” cut admin and increase speedy payments for training providers, according to the Department for Education. 

In another announcement during this year’s National Apprenticeships Week, the DfE said training providers will no longer be required to enter key apprentice registration details across two separate systems: the ILR and the apprenticeship service. 

Instead, there will be a “single data source” that will remove the need for the same data to be added to both systems and then cross-checked and verified.

DfE told FE Week that apprentice data added to the ILR will be visible to employers through their apprenticeship service account. This will remove the need for data matching and double entering of data.

If it works, the change, due to be fully rolled out in August 2026, should see an end to so-called “data match errors“. These occur when data about an apprentice submitted by a training provider on the ILR doesn’t match the data submitted by the employer on the government’s apprenticeship service. 

These errors, also called DLOCKS, can be costly because providers don’t get paid until the error is resolved. This currently takes up to two months on average, DfE told us.

The department claims their new “single data source” will “eliminate data mismatches” between the two databases. 

Writing for FE Week, skills minister Jacqui Smith said: “We are simplifying payment processed for apprenticeship training providers and will no longer require them to replicate their data entry to receive funding for apprenticeship training delivered.

“As a result, providers will no longer encounter data mismatches, eliminating the problems they cause such as delayed payments and increased admin errors.”

The government said it will begin to remove data duplication from this August. Once rolled out a year later, providers will no longer need to enter data into the apprenticeship service. 

Speeding up payments to providers will not only cut admin costs but also improve their cash flow. 

The Association of Employment and Learning Providers welcomed the move.

Simon Ashworth, deputy CEO, said: “This is a welcome measure and will reduce the disproportionate time, effort and cost placed on providers, allowing them to receive payment with fewer delays.” 

More information on implementation has been promised “in due course” from government.

Apprenticeships help solve housing sector brain drain

Arguably no sector is more in need of change – and investment – than the housing sector. Apprenticeships present a powerful way to tackle one of the sector’s biggest challenges: the ongoing ‘brain drain’ of skilled professionals.

At Kingdom Academy (a training provider which is part of Kingdom Services Group), we’re committed to professionalising the housing sector to address the damaging exodus of talent. The ‘brain drain’ refers to the trend of people leaving a sector or organisation for better pay, benefits, career progression, or training opportunities elsewhere. Industries that fail to invest in their workforce, or to position themselves as desirable places to work, are left behind – and the housing industry could be at greater risk than ever.

In our sector, knowledge transfer – the sharing of skills, ideas, and expertise – is critical to improving the quality of housing nationwide, a challenge which is particularly acute. When experienced professionals leave, it not only risks a gap in essential skills but also diminishes the collective passion and ambition needed to improve the homes and lives of communities. Apprenticeships can bridge this gap, offering structured career development that attracts new talent, retains existing staff, and strengthens the perception of housing as a viable, exciting, and impactful career path.

As well as the investment in construction apprenticeships to properly kickstart housebuilding, there must be a simultaneous drive to ensure that those responsible for managing the homes have the skills, knowledge and qualifications required to do the job properly.

By formalising qualifications and career paths, the sector can attract new talent and offer clear progression routes for existing staff, retaining staff long-term. In the coming years, this won’t just be a matter of choice but will be a legal requirement. Under the new regulations, social housing providers managing more than 50 homes are required to ensure their senior housing staff are qualified to, or working towards, Level 4 or 5 standards by 2026. It’s estimated that as many as 25,000 workers may need upskilling, regardless of age or previous qualifications.

By formalising career pathways and professional qualifications, apprenticeships can provide clear progression routes. This isn’t a box-ticking exercise – it’s a way to show employees that the sector values their growth and future.

Real lives, real change

Apprenticeships in housing aren’t just for school leavers. They are for people of all ages and backgrounds who want to make a meaningful contribution to the sector. One of our learners started their Housing and Property Management Level 3 apprenticeship in their mid-40s. Having previously worked manual jobs on riverboats for over two decades, they transitioned to an office-based role as a housing officer, driven by a personal passion for helping people access quality housing. Despite not having studied since school, their apprenticeship not only equipped them with legal and sector knowledge but also deepened their commitment to their work and the wider housing sector.

This story highlights a crucial point: apprenticeships in housing are not only for newcomers but also for those seeking to progress or improve in their current roles. For many, the experience is transformative, offering the chance to connect with peers, learn from others’ perspectives, and develop networks that foster engagement with the sector. One learner even reported that a quarter of their apprenticeship learning came from interacting with other professionals, demonstrating the vital role apprenticeships play in cultivating a collaborative, knowledgeable workforce.

If we are to meet the challenges of the future, including new regulatory demands and the need for innovation, housing must invest in its people. Apprenticeships are not only a solution to today’s skills shortage but also a way to revitalise the sector and secure its long-term future. By professionalising the housing workforce, we can ensure that housing remains a career people are proud to choose – and a sector that thrives.