Back in business: Employers renew case for level 2 business admin

Employers are making another attempt to get a level 2 business administration apprenticeship over the line, with plans to launch a government petition if officials continue to reject the proposal.

A trailblazer group held a meeting with around 100 employers last week to sound out support for the bid ahead of a formal submission in September.

A survey has also been launched to ask more businesses to back the proposal, working with the provisional title of level 2 “administration assistant”, to “demonstrate current business need” to the Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (IfATE).

The institute has batted away proposals for such a course since the popular level 2 business admin apprenticeship under the old-style frameworks was officially switched off on July 31, 2020. Officials claimed that a proposed replacement did not meet the required duration or quality of the new-style apprenticeship standards.

An alternative “public sector organisation administrative assistant” standard at level 2 was put forward months later but was dropped last year after Rob Nitsch, IfATE’s delivery director, said it was “some distance off” the quality threshold.

The survey for the latest proposal, which will be for both public and private sector employers, states that, if the institute “continues to deny the need for a level 2 administration standard, it has been suggested that our next step could be to launch a petition to get a formal response from government.

“We would create a petition that asks for a change to government policy. After 10,000 signatures, petitions get a response from the government and, after 100,000 signatures, petitions are considered for debate in Parliament.”

A spokesperson for IfATE said: “‘Where employers have come forward, we have continued to work with them, and this includes with regard to business administration. We continue to remain open to new standards and the adjustment of all where they satisfy the necessary criteria.”

There is a level 3 business administrator standard available, which has attracted over 55,000 starts since its launch in 2017. The standard is currently being revised, including its content, end-point assessment plan and £5,000 funding band.

But employers such as the NHS, councils, supermarkets and police have warned that level 3 is not the right entry point for many business admin apprentices, and the absence of a level 2 equivalent is the “missing rung” of skills minister Robert Halfon’s supposed “ladder of opportunity”.

The Education and Skills Funding Agency previously highlighted the level 2 customer service practitioner standard as a potential replacement for the level 2 business admin framework, but admitted this would not fit all apprentices’ needs.

The level 2 business admin apprenticeship trailblazer group was not able to comment.

‘Astonishing’: Ofqual publishes VTQ entries for first time

Ofqual has published entry data for vocational and technical qualifications for the first time.

Today the exams watchdog revealed that more than 334,000 results for level 3 VTQs, which include BTECs and CTECs, are due to be issued in August.

Every year, A-level entry figures are published, but this is the first year that similar data has been published for VTQs.

Ofqual claimed the move marks the “first significant step towards parity of treatment between A-levels and VTQs”.

It is a “milestone” in the regulator’s VTQ action plan, which was launched following last year’s results debacle that saw around 21,000 BTEC and Cambridge Technical (CTEC) results issued late, leaving students in limbo.

Ofqual chief regulator Jo Saxton (pictured) said: “As astonishing as it seems, never have we had a definitive picture of the number of vocational and technical results expected ahead of results day, even though this has been in place for GCSEs and A-levels for many years.

“Over the years, we’ve heard a lot of words about parity, but the publication of this data represents the first concrete actions in securing parity for all students.

“Every student deserves the chance to move on quickly and smoothly to the next stage of their career after working hard to obtain their qualifications – whether they study VTQs or A-levels or a combination.”

Despite its promises of parity, the data published today is sparse compared to the equivalent release for A-levels and GCSEs.

Earlier this month, Ofqual published 2023 data which broke GCSE and A-level entry data down by subject and provider type.

FE Week has asked Ofqual for a further breakdown of their VTQ entry data as this was not initially released.

Ofqual said the entries data is the culmination of 2,500 schools and colleges in England confirming with awarding organisations which of their students expect to get level 3 VTQ results this summer.

The watchdog is working with a new VTQ Taskforce, made up of sector representatives, to oversee the delivery of its VTQ action plan.

David Hughes, chief executive of the Association of Colleges, said: “With an economy crying out for people with technical skills, it is pleasing to see just how many young people are on course to achieve VTQs this summer.

“We should celebrate their successes just as much we do the achievements of their peers doing A-levels; and now we can see the huge number expecting a result, we can begin to understand the positive impact this part of the education system has on the economy and on young people’s lives.”

The VTQ taskforce members are:

.             Association of Colleges (Catherine Sezen, Interim Director of Education Policy)

 .            Association of School and College Leaders (Dr Anne Murdoch, Senior Adviser, College Leadership)

 .            Confederation of School Trusts (Steve Rollett, Deputy Chief Executive)

 .            Department for Education (Directors, Qualifications) (Observers)

 .            Federation of Awarding Bodies (Tom Bewick, CEO)

 .            Joint Council for Qualifications (Ian Morgan, Chairman, Margaret Farragher, CEO)

 .            NAHT (Sarah Hannafin, Senior Policy Advisor)

 .            National Association of Examinations Officers (Jugjit Chima, CEO)

 .            OCR (Jill Duffy, CEO)

 .            Office for Students (John Blake, Director for Fair Access and Participation)

 .            Pearson (Freya Thomas-Monk, SVP Vocational Qualifications & Training)

 .            Sixth Form Colleges Association (Bill Watkin, Chief Executive)

 .            UCAS (Clare Marchant, Chief Executive)

Council rapped for failing to meet student’s SEND transport costs

A mother has been awarded almost £3,500 in compensation after a council refused to pay to transport her son, who suffers with anxiety, to college.

The young adult, who has an education, health and care plan, spent three academic years being driven to and from college by his family as Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council “failed to recognise its duty to arrange free transport”, a report by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman found.

The review also highlighted an inadequate appeals process and poor record-keeping that led to long delays in addressing the mother’s concerns.

The council has agreed to apologise to the mother and reimburse her fuel costs and for the “distress, uncertainty and time and trouble” caused.

Local authorities do not have to provide free or subsidised post-16 travel support but have a duty to “encourage, enable and assist young people with learning difficulties/disabilities (SEND) to participate in education, up to the age of 25”, according to government guidance.

Young people with SEND qualify for free transport where a council assesses that, in order to attend education, they require transport arranged by the local authority.

Ali Fiddy, a solicitor and chief executive of the Independent Provider of Special Education Advice (IPSEA), said post-16 SEND transport was an area where “most local authorities are trying to cut costs by changing or limiting the offer”.

In a speech at the NATSPEC annual conference this week, she described the issue as a “real lottery” and “worrying issue” for families once their child leaves school at age 16. She said it was “very difficult to challenge” a council when it refuses to provide free travel for SEND learners in further education.

The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman reported that the young adult in Stock-on-Tees was originally travelling to college in shared transport, paid for by the council. But, when his mother said it was no longer suitable because of his anxiety, the council failed to “properly consider the mother’s concerns or make other suitable arrangements”.

The ombudsman found the council’s post-16 transport policy “was not in line with its statutory duties”, adding that the council should have provided transport free of charge “if it considered transport necessary”. Instead it required a contribution from the mother.

The investigation also found the council’s appeals process did not follow statutory guidance – it did not offer a hearing at stage two of the complaints process, and then did not direct people who were unhappy to the ombudsman.

Additionally, the ombudsman criticised the council’s poor record-keeping: it did not have a central system for recording decisions, which would have allowed these to be accessed after staff left.

Paul Najsarek, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, said: “The council’s responses to my enquiries, and its current transport policy, leaves me concerned that there are systematic issues in Stockton that may be affecting other young adult learners who have education, health and care plans.

“I am also particularly concerned that the council is not signposting parents to my office if they are unhappy with the outcome of any complaint about its appeals process.

“I am therefore pleased the council has accepted my recommendations to improve its processes and policies to ensure other young adults – and their families – are treated fairly and in line with statutory guidance.”

Stockton-on-Tees council has now agreed to pay the mother £3,432.50.

The council has also agreed to amend its letters, templates and policies to ensure they fall in line with statutory guidance and refer people to the ombudsman, and provide training and guidance to staff responsible for school and college transport on its new policy.

Councillor Bob Cook, leader of Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council, said: “We recognise the findings of the ombudsman and have offered our apologies to Ms X, who we will also reimburse for fuel costs. 

“Steps have now been taken to ensure this does not happen again, including updating the relevant policy and procedures.” 

ESFA to run special AEB allocations review for colleges

Colleges facing cuts to their national adult education budget allocations due to underdelivery during Covid will have their funding reviewed, the government has announced. 

The special review of ESFA-funded AEB allocations for 2023/24 is planned for colleges and other grant-funded providers that have experienced a significant boost in delivery this year following drops in adult learner numbers over the previous two years.

Recruitment of adult learners took a fall in 2020 and 2021 amid the pandemic and associated lockdowns, forcing many colleges and other providers to underperform against their annual grant funding allocations.

The Education and Skills Funding Agency released individual AEB budgets for 2023/24 at the end of March, but multiple colleges found their allocations have been reduced compared to recent years.

The funding taken away from those colleges who suffered with low recruitment in the Covid years, delivering less than 90 per cent of their allocations, was used to increase the budgets for colleges who had over-delivered.

But there are concerns that the 2023/24 allocations will not be sufficient as recruitment returns to pre-pandemic levels.

The ESFA has now promised to review those most affected this November.

In an update to the sector today, the agency said: “We delivered ESFA adult education budget funding allocations for academic year 2023/24 at the end of March. Some providers received an allocation lower than their 2022/23 funding allocation. This is because their delivery was below 90 per cent of their allocation over the past two funding years.

“A small number of providers with lower funding allocations will have significantly increased their delivery in academic year 2022/23. This could mean their delivery in 2022/23 exceeds their allocation for academic year 2023/24.

“We will operate a review process for these providers in November 2023.”

This process will only apply to those providers who have a “significantly reduced allocation in academic year 2023/24” and can “evidence significant increased delivery in their R14 data return for academic year 2022/23”.

The ESFA said it will publish the criteria for this process and further information in the next update of the AEB funding rules “later in June”.

ChatGPT: Keegan launches call for evidence on AI in education

Education secretary Gillian Keegan is launching a call for evidence on using artificial intelligence (AI) like ChatGPT in education “to get the best” out of the new technology.

Keegan will tell the London Tech Week conference she wants to “kick start a conversation” with experts on using generative AI in a “safe and secure way”.

She believes teachers’ day-to-day work could be “transformed” by the emerging tech and help with workload, but that the standard is not yet there.

It comes a mid growing debate about the role AI should play in education – with fears it could be used for cheating by students.

The Department for Education has also today confirmed a new “digital and computing skills education taskforce”, made up of tech experts and led by senior civil servants (see full list below).

Members include Dame Wendy Hall, who developed the microcosm hypermedia system in the mid-1980s, a forerunner to the World Wide Web.

The group will establish what computing and digital skills are needed now and for the future and work with industry experts to “encourage” more young people to consider a career in cyber security, AI or computing, DfE said.

‘We need to understand the opportunities and risks’

Keegan is inviting schools, colleges and universities to respond to the call for evidence, which will close on August 23.

Ministers want to get a handle on how generative AI is being and could be used in education providers as well as any risks, ethical considerations and training needed for staff.

Keegan will tell tech experts the education workforce needs to be “best equipped with the skills and knowledge” so they can “ride the wave” of AI.

“For that potential to be realised, we – the government, our schools, colleges and universities – need to be able to understand those opportunities, as well as the real risks new technology brings.

“That’s why we want to kick start a conversation with experts from across education and technology to hear their views and learn from their experiences. This will help us make the right decisions to get the best out of generative AI in a safe and secure way.”

DfE previously advised schools and colleges they “may wish to review” their homework policies and strengthen cyber security as AI could increase the credibility of attacks.

Ministers committed in March to “convene” experts to work with the education sector to “share and identify best practice and opportunities to improve education and reduce workload using generative AI”.

Exam boards have also published their own guidance on “protecting the integrity of qualifications”. It stated schools and colleges should make students do some coursework in class “under direct supervision” to make sure they are not cheating.

The digital and computing skills education taskforce:

  • Julia Kinniburgh (chair) – Director General Skills, Department for Education
  • Tom Rodden (deputy chair) – Chief Scientific Advisor, Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
  • Dame Muffy Calder – Head of College of Science and Engineering University of Glasgow
  • Rashik Parmar MBE – Group CEO of The British Computing Society The Chartered Institute for IT
  • Dame Wendy Hall – Professor of Computer Science at Southampton University
  • Matthew Scullion – founder and CEO of Matillion
  • Lawrence Munro – Global Head of Innovation at NCC Group
  • Araceli Venegas-Gomez – CEO and Founder of QURECA

How Ofsted’s proposed new complaints process will work

Ofsted is consulting on a new complaints procedure following prolonged criticism and its acceptance the current system is “not working”.

In January, FE Week’s sister paper Schools Week revealed that senior leaders were reviewing the process to make it more human and less bureaucratic.

And pressure for change has since been ramped up amid the fallout from the death of headteacher Ruth Perry.

Ofsted’s complaints policy was in the spotlight again last week as training provider UKTD Ltd remarkably overturned its ‘inadequate’ judgement following a botched inspection last year.

Now Ofsted has revealed its plans that would see it throw out its current system of internal reviews and allow leaders unhappy with how their complaints are handled to go straight to an external adjudicator.

If approved, the changes will replace the cusrrent procedure that was put in place in 2020.

Here’s what you need to know…

1. Formal ‘checks’ with leaders during inspections

Ofsted said its inspectors already routinely check with leaders throughout an inspection if they have “queries or concerns”.

The watchdog has proposed formalising this by asking inspectors to check with leaders at specific stages of the visit, “where appropriate”.

These stages will be…

  • during the pre-inspection notification call or when an inspector arrives
  • at the end-of-day meetings
  • at the final feedback session

Ofsted said inspectors could then address any issues raised at the time, rather than after the inspection has taken place.

2. Direct line to a senior inspector

Providers will be given a “new opportunity” to call Ofsted on the day after their inspection to discuss “any unresolved issues”. It is understood this has been piloted in one region of England already.

The watchdog said this may include raising informal concerns about the process and its “likely outcome”, queries about what happens next or highlighting “information that they feel was not fully considered”.

Ofsted said these calls would be directed to senior inspectors “relevant to the type of inspection, but separate to the inspection in question”. 

The inspectors “will then discuss any issues with the provider so that they can be resolved at the earliest opportunity”.

3. Two routes to address concerns

At present, complaints about Ofsted follow a four-step complaints process. 

The first step is raising concerns informally shortly after inspection. The second, if issues are not resolved informally, is a formal complaint. The third is an internal review and the fourth is an external complaint to an official adjudicator.

Ofsted is proposing a new first step, with two routes. Leaders can either highlight “minor points of clarity or factual accuracy”, which will be considered “promptly” before the report is then finalised.

The watchdog said it expected “the vast majority of providers to follow this route”. 

However, those that do will “not normally have a later opportunity to raise a formal complaint or challenge”, which is a change from the current approach, though Ofsted will consider each provider’s circumstances.

The other option is a formal complaint.

4. An inspector calls…

Formal complaints will be investigated by a member of Ofsted staff “independent of the inspection”. 

This will involve a phone call to “explore their concerns fully and, where possible, resolve issues quickly”. Principals/CEOs can highlight information they feel was “not fully considered”.

There will be four possible outcomes to an investigation…

  • No change to a report
  • Changes to a report’s text only
  • Changes to a grade, including overall effectiveness
  • The inspection is deemed incomplete and confirmation of a further visit to gather more evidence

Ofsted said it would also revise complaint outcome letters to be “clearer for providers about the reasons for decisions made”.

5. Internal review process scrapped

Ofsted said it believed its proposals would help it achieve a “right first time” approach and “strengthen” complaints-handling arrangements.

As a result, the watchdog plans to scrap internal reviews of how it handles complaints, which currently form step three of its process.

Under the current scheme, schools, colleges and providers have to go through this internal review before they can ask for an external, independent review.

Under the new scheme, providers concerned that their complaint did not correctly follow the right process would be able to go directly to the Independent Complaints Adjudication Service for Ofsted (ICASO).

This will “reduce the burden on providers raising concerns”, the watchdog said. 

“Instead of the current escalated levels of review, Ofsted will consider any formal complaints once, and thoroughly.”

6. External reviews of closed complaints

Ofsted also plans to introduce periodic reviews of how it handles complaints.

This will be done by taking a sample of closed complaints, which would be submitted to a panel of external reviewers, which will include external representatives from the sectors Ofsted inspects.

They can “provide challenge and transparency on how we have handled complaints about our work”.

Have your say by September

The consultation, which opened today, will run until Friday, September 15. 

Ofsted said the “information you provide us with will inform our new post-inspection arrangements and how we handle complaints about our work”.

“We will publish on our website a report on the outcome of this consultation in due course.”

Reclassification among reasons for considerably delayed college accounts

Unfinished audits and reclassification to the public sector are among the reasons why nine colleges have considerably missed the government’s deadline for publishing their annual accounts this year.

Education and Skills Funding Agency rules state that colleges must publish their audited accounts in an easily accessible location on their website no later than January 31 each year to “maximise transparency and to support accountability”.

However, 2022 accounts for nine of the 170-odd colleges in England are still yet to surface five months after the deadline.

Plumpton College said its delay is down to the Department for Education’s new strict arrangements for capital borrowing.

Colleges have had to gain special permission – which will only be granted in rare circumstances – to borrow commercially since November 29, 2022, when the Office for National Statistics changed their status from the private to the public sector.

The overnight ruling resulted in many colleges having to put key campus projects on hold. In response, the DfE belatedly launched its own time-limited loans scheme for college capital projects, but this process is still ongoing.

A spokesperson for Plumpton College said: “Plumpton has completed its annual report and accounts, with a clean audit and approval by the corporation in December. The college is however unable to submit signed accounts until the DfE confirm a loan to replace its commercial borrowing for a capital project completed in April 2023.

“The DfE is aware of the situation and has extended the filing deadline pending their approval of the loan facility.”

As well as new rules on borrowing, reclassification to the public sector has opened colleges up to scrutiny of “novel, contentious, or repercussive transactions” such as those that are considered to be outside of colleges’ normal sphere of business or may cause controversy or criticism.

Lincoln College Group is among the colleges that attract the largest amounts of commercial and international income and is one of the nine colleges to not have published accounts for 2022 yet.

A spokesperson for the college said: “As with a few other colleges, transfer to the public sector has led to a delay in the filing of our accounts. We are working closely with the DfE and our auditors to ensure this takes place as soon as possible.”

Two of the other colleges with late accounts said unfinished audits had caused the delay.

South Gloucestershire and Stroud College said: “The ESFA via Mazars have undertaken a funding audit of SGS college provision of which we are still awaiting the final report. College accounts cannot be signed off until this report is received. The ESFA is aware of this, and accounts will be submitted when the report is provided. SGS college remains in good financial health.”

And Hull College said: “Hull College is currently undergoing an ESFA financial audit and is unable to submit and publish accounts until that audit process has been completed. The ESFA are aware and working with us to bring the audit to a conclusion.”

Kingston Maurward College, a land-based college in Dorset, is also yet to file accounts for 2022. The college has faced financial challenges over the past few years due to a big hit on its commercial income during the pandemic and associated lockdowns.

The college received a financial notice to improve as well as an FE Commissioner visit last year.

Principal Luke Rake told FE Week the “continued financial challenge” means that whilst his college works through the details with the ESFA and FE Commissioner teams together, the board is “not yet comfortable signing off the 12-month going concerns just yet”.

“We anticipate getting this resolved fairly soon,” Rake added.

Eastleigh College – which is expected to merge with struggling City College Southampton as well as Fareham College in August 2023 to create a “financially strong network” – is also yet to file accounts for 2022.

A spokesperson for Eastleigh would only say the college has “been working to deadlines agreed by the DfE” and that it “expects to publish accounts in due course”.

The three other colleges with late 2022 accounts – South Essex College, Strode College and Wakefield College – did not respond to requests for comment.

Join the educational extravaganza: Festival of Education returns

The Festival of Education, a highly anticipated event for teachers and educators, is set to take place at Wellington College on Thursday, July 6th, and Friday, July 7th. With an impressive attendance of over 5,000 educators across the two days, this festival promises to be an exceptional opportunity for professional development, networking, and inspiration.

Over 250 sessions from over 300 speakers

Spanning an extensive array of educational topics, the Festival of Education offers attendees the chance to choose from more than 250 sessions delivered by renowned experts in their respective fields. From cutting-edge advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) to racial justice advocacy, cognitive science to great teaching techniques, there is a rich tapestry of subjects to explore and engage with.

Eddie Izzard
Eddie Izzard will provide a keynote on Day One

At the core of the event are the esteemed keynote speakers who will grace the stage, sharing their wisdom and experiences. The diverse line up includes keynotes from celebrated comedian and actor Eddie Izzard, naturalist and presenter Chris Packham, Ofsted Chief Inspector Amanda Spielman, educational psychologist Paul Kirschner, prominent politician Andy Burnham, and esteemed researcher Derron Wallace. Each speaker brings a unique perspective and expertise, ensuring attendees gain valuable insights and fresh perspectives.

AI in Education Strand

In addition to the engaging sessions and notable keynote speakers, the Festival of Education offers 23 carefully curated strands developed in collaboration with partner organisations.

These strands serve as thematic focuses within the event, allowing participants to delve deeper into specific areas of interest. Some of the captivating strands on offer include “AI in Education,” exploring the transformative potential of artificial intelligence; “The BAMEed Racial Justice Strand,” shedding light on the importance of diversity and equality in education; “Cognitive Science,” uncovering the latest research and insights into how students learn best; and “Great Teaching,” equipping educators with practical strategies to enhance their teaching practice.

Amanda Spielman
Ofsted chief, Amanda Spielman

The Festival of Education aims to empower teachers and educators, fostering an environment of continuous growth and innovation. It serves as a platform for sharing knowledge, exchanging ideas, and sparking collaborations among professionals in the education sector. Whether attendees are seasoned educators or aspiring teachers, the festival promises an inspiring and informative experience for all.

Tickets on sale now

Interested participants can visit the festival’s official website (https://educationfest.co.uk/) to access detailed information about the event, browse the extensive program schedule, and secure their place among the thousands of dedicated educators who will gather at Wellington College. FE Week readers should use the following discount code for 20% off (SUB17865SW).

The Festival of Education stands out from other education events as it takes place amidst the picturesque grounds of Wellington College, creating a stunning backdrop for an immersive and unique experience.

Over 13 marquee venues are thoughtfully constructed, offering a diverse range of sessions and activities. What sets this event apart is its vibrant festival atmosphere, where attendees can soak in the energetic ambiance while exploring the various offerings.

To add to the festive spirit, there is even a cocktail van, ensuring that participants can relax and enjoy refreshments in between sessions. This dynamic blend of captivating content and a festival vibe makes the Festival of Education a truly extraordinary and unforgettable gathering for educators.

David Olusoga
Historian David Olusoga addressing the Festival in 2022

By attending the Festival of Education, teachers will gain valuable insights, practical strategies, and inspiration to transform their classrooms and positively impact the lives of their students. With an abundance of sessions, renowned speakers, and diverse strands to choose from, this event is a must-attend for anyone passionate about education.

Don’t miss the chance to be a part of this extraordinary gathering of educators. Book your tickets now to secure your place at the Festival of Education, and join thousands of like-minded professionals in an enriching celebration of learning and innovation.

For more information and ticket bookings, visit the Festival of Education website at https://educationfest.co.uk/. FE Week readers should use the following discount code for 20% off (SUB17865SW).

Highlights video from the 2022 Festival of Education.

Former skills minister Andrea Jenkyns to be made a dame

The former skills minister Andrea Jenkyns will be made a dame for “political and public service” despite serving in the role for just three and half months.

Jenkyns is among several Boris Johnson loyalists to receive honours and peerages in the former prime minister’s resignation honours list. 

The MP for Morley and Outwood was first made a minister in July 2022 to replace Alex Burghart who was one of a string of ministers to dramatically resign from Boris Johnson’s cabinet last summer.

‘No, madam minister’: Street slams Jenkyns’ devo-sceptic remarks

Jenkyns was first appointed by Johnson as parliamentary under secretary of state (junior minister) for skills, further and higher education. When Liz Truss became prime minister that September, Jenkyns was reappointed as minister for skills. A month later, she was fired and replaced by Robert Halfon by new prime minister Rishi Sunak.

In her brief stint at the Department for Education, Jenkyns served under two education secretaries, James Cleverley and Kit Malthouse. 

Jenkyns said: “I am deeply honoured to have been awarded a Damehood (DBE) for public and political services, having been nominated by our Nation’s greatest Prime Minister since Margaret Thatcher, the Rt Hon. Boris Johnson, it was an honour to serve in his Government as a Minister & a Whip 🇬🇧”

Her appointment as an education minister attracted some controversy at the time of her first appointment to the DfE after footage emerged that showed her raising a middle finger to protestors in Downing Street.

The incident even sparked a complaint from Alison Peacock, the chief executive of the Chartered College of Teaching.

In those three months, Jenkyns found herself the target of scathing remarks from the mayor of the West Midlands, fellow conservative Andy Street, for telling the Local Government Chronicle that she was “not a proponent of elected mayors” and said she wanted to see that adult education powers are “being well used first, before giving more [funding] away”. The Department for Education was forced to row back on her comments. 

Jenkyns was in post during the tumultuous period of exam results delays and blunders last summer affecting thousands of BTEC and Cambridge Technical students and some T Level courses.  

Before being made a minister, Jenkyns served for ten months as an assistant government whip.

Receiving knighthoods are former cabinet minister Jacob Rees-Mogg and Lichfield MP Michael Fabricant. Former home secretary Priti Patel is also being made a dame and Tees Valley mayor Ben Houchen is to be made a lord.