How NEET providers are propping up a failing system

Nick, 18, loves tinkering with his motorbike and was named “student of the year” while training to be a mechanic at St Eds, a vocational centre in Norwich.

His chosen trade is on the government’s skilled worker shortage list. Yet, like almost a million 16-24 year olds, he is currently not in education, employment or training (NEET).

This summer, he was “buzzing” after being offered an apprenticeship at a local vehicle dealership – until his FE college provider pulled out two weeks later, saying he lacked the required level of English and maths.

Left feeling “absolutely crushed,” Nick is now back at St Eds, volunteering with younger trainees and getting help from its welfare team and careers adviser, Katie, to find another job.

His experience reflects the barriers facing young NEETs, and how providers like St Eds are trying to overcome them, despite growing pressures.

Nick at St Eds

‘The key is pastoral support’

St Eds mostly supports 16 to 19-year-olds in a dreary industrial unit that was formerly used as a funeral home, window factory, gym, smokehouse, printers and pub. “The building isn’t really designed for what we do,” admits chief executive Joe Crossley. But inside, the charity has brightened it up with student artwork and motivational messages.

Crossley says St Eds’ success rests on intensive pastoral support for vulnerable young people whose needs schools and colleges were unable to meet. Thirty-six learners have education, health and care plans; their EHCP coordinator Sarah ensures tutors “know what their triggers are”.

The welfare team, headed by ex-police officer Amy, works closely with social services and youth offending teams. Many learners face issues including county lines, exploitation and knife crime. Engagement officer Laura, a trained counsellor, provides additional support.

This model seems to work. Last year, all 153 young people finished their study programmes and 91 per cent progressed into work, apprenticeships or training (up from 84 per cent the previous year, before Katie took on the role of engaging employers).

Juniper Training, a large independent training provider (ITP) in the Midlands, tells a similar story. Chief executive Lesley Holland credits their pastoral staff with being instrumental in helping them to achieve 100 per cent progression for their 2,000 learners. Since Covid, Juniper has expanded safeguarding and counselling roles – vital, Holland says, since CAMHS (child and adolescent mental health services) wait times are now often longer than a year.

Staff frequently go far beyond contracted hours – taking learners made homeless to their accommodation late at night, liaising with social workers and delivering food parcels during holidays.

St Eds’ careers advisor Rachel

Castles built on rocks

St Eds’ extra support roles cost £250,000-£300,000 a year, funded by charitable donations. But competition for grants is growing. “We love what you do, but we’ve had 500 applicants” is now common feedback, says Crossley.

He sees providers like his as “castles built on rocks”.

His charity hit financial difficulties in 2023 after its main funder, Skills Training UK, collapsed. It survived only after a subcontract was signed with East Coast College to deliver level 1 courses. Most St Eds tutors come directly from trades, so are “rough around the edges” and require extensive training to become teachers, but the £5,100 pay gap between ITPs and colleges means they are sometimes “poached” by colleges.

Employability provision is also unstable. Analysis of the Department for Work and Pensions dynamic purchasing system by J and G Chambers Consulting shows 130 organisations have secured contracts since 2022, but 71 have exited the market.

Fewer organisations are tendering for contracts, with the number falling from 9.95 businesses per contract in 2022 to 3.39 in 2025. The average contract value has dropped, too.

Spear is a six-week employability programme run in 17 centres nationwide by the charity Resurgo, supporting NEETs with at least one additional barrier to getting work.

Programme manager Ella Jenkinson says much of the other employability provision they come across “pops up and goes”. They were met with scepticism when launching in Bournemouth: “How long are you going to stay around?” she was asked. But now after five years, referral partners say Spear is “the only service we continue to refer to”.

“Five years isn’t even that long, but it is for this sector”, she says.

Ness Morse and Ella Jenkinson, Spear Programme

Demand outstripping capacity

The rising size of the 16-19 population, combined with increased school exclusions, has intensified pressure on level 1 provision. An Association of Colleges survey revealed that shortages of teachers and classrooms mean students are being put on waiting lists even for priority sector subjects like construction. 

ITPs report similar pressures. Paul Stannard, senior policy manager for the Association of Employment and Learning Providers (AELP), says there is “definitely unmet demand at levels 1 and 2”, especially in construction and NEET programmes. Level 1 courses are costly to run: funding is the same as for higher levels, but class sizes are generally smaller, with more support needed.

City College Norwich had to quickly expand its level 1 provision this year after enrolling 965 learners against a plan for 886. Principal Jerry White says current 16-18 funding “does little to recognise the extra resources needed” for success at that level.

As a result, when the college replaced level 1 courses in plumbing and electrical with multi-skills provision, nearby St Eds – which was already full – received a surge of placement requests.

St Eds’ student Faith George, CEO Joe Crossley and AELP senior policy manager Paul Stannard

Growth caps shutting out learners

Providers struggle to accommodate young people who join NEET programmes after September, says Stannard. Juniper accepts monthly intakes to accommodate college dropouts, but these learners do not appear in that year’s funding allocations if enrolled after November, causing “issues” for its finance team, says Holland.

New DfE ‘affordability’ caps mean providers now receive only around two-thirds of eligible in-year funding on growth worth £500,000 over earnings. For Juniper, this means turning away young people despite high demand.

Holland says: “I don’t understand why, when a young person is legally entitled to education until 18, we’re ever in a position where we have to turn them away.”

She knows of “other providers with waiting lists, or they’ve closed the doors”, and believes these caps should instead be “based on the size of the provider”.

Juniper’s study programme contract is worth £11.5 million, and “to stay within half a million pounds of that when you’re talking about people is very challenging”. 

In September 2024, Juniper agreed to help provide provision for around 2,000 young NEETs in Leeds left with nowhere to go due to an acute shortage of FE placements in the city.

But because they enrolled after November, these placements went unfunded that year. 

Juniper delivered anyway, knowing they may never be paid. “We’re almost being punished for our success,” Holland says.

Funding is also lower for 18-year-olds than 16 to 17-year-olds, despite many being at the same educational stage due to mental health or school refusal.

St Eds vocational training centre in Norwich

Job search and rejection

St Eds aligns its curriculum with local skills improvement plans – 65 per cent of its provision is construction-related, and the charity “ticks employers’ boxes for social values”, Crossley says. But with more competition for jobs, employers are “less inclined to take on our learners”.

Spear Hastings manager Ness Morse says young people often rely solely on applying via jobs website Indeed, firing off “dozens of applications at the click of a button, but hearing nothing back”. She believes that employers receive hundreds of applications for some entry-level positions and “look for ways to cross people off their list”.

But as studies suggest that up to 80 per cent of jobs are never publicly advertised, Morse advises young people to instead “print off their CVs and walk into workplaces, make personal connections and use who they know”.

Jenkinson finds it “frustrating” that maths and English are often required for roles that don’t need them. “It’s almost a tick box on [employers’] systems that becomes an automatic rejection.” The “soft skills” of “communication, timekeeping and attitude” that young people develop through Spear “are exactly what employers want,” she says, yet their lack of maths or English qualifications are “often the obstacle to them hiring our young people”.

Juniper’s director of quality, Tara Hughes, says the 100-hour teaching requirement for English/maths is particularly difficult to achieve for late starters, forcing them to cut programme sizes or deliver unfunded teaching. “These are the most disaffected young people, yet we’re sticking them in classrooms for five hours of maths or English a week for the duration of their programmes.”

Mock interviews as part of the Spear programme

Invaluable feedback

At the Spear programme’s centre in Hastings, around a dozen young NEETs are nervously sat at tables dotted around a former church hall, doing practice interviews for prospective jobs they have applied for. 

Their interviewers are local volunteers who have given up their time to help these young people gain what for many is their first-ever experience of an interview.

These volunteers all have senior experience of the sector the young person they are paired with is applying into; Guy has run restaurant businesses, and Paul is a Salvation Army coach with a teaching background.

Afterwards, the interviewers provide feedback so the young people are better prepared for their second mock interview later that day.

“They’ll come away with a much-needed confidence boost, and that will give them maybe just enough hope to just start sending out some more CVs,” says Morse.

The King’s Trust’s youth index survey found that over four in 10 young NEETs are not confident they know what employers are looking for when recruiting. Jenkinson says this interview practice is “invaluable” as “time and time again, we hear that young people aren’t getting feedback from interviews… so they really don’t know how they’re coming across.”

Brothers Jaylen and Baron at St Eds

Building confidence

Although the government’s ‘youth guarantee’ scheme is focused on providing work experience placements, the King’s Trust youth index found NEETs placed just as much value on developing confidence (32 per cent, compared to 30 per cent for work experience) for helping them move into work.

At St Eds, many first arrive with hoods up and headphones on. Rather than banning this, staff wait for learners to feel confident enough to remove the hoods and devices. Behaviour points earn rewards – from canteen vouchers (“cheesy chips are the key”, says Crossley) to Amazon Fire tablets. These rewards help break down the “massive stigma” that many of them have with education, based on their experiences of school.

Baron, 18, attends St Eds along with his 14-year-old brother, Jaylen, after being suspended from school and dropping out of college.

At St Eds “there’s never a grumpy moment with the teachers”. At school, he found his teachers “moody”.

Morse explains that Spear’s “high support, high challenge” approach means that “if someone is struggling with something that feels quite inherent – ‘this is me, I have anxiety or autism and cannot do that’ – you bring challenge so it’s not limiting on them”.

In Coventry, provider PET-Xi uses gamification to help autistic young adults translate online skills into real-world confidence. 

“Someone who’s 13 could be managing a world of people online… we are the product of the things we spend time on,” says trainer Miguel Sa.

He spent eight hours on gaming communication platform Discord with one participant, Jacob, before he felt able to join a video call. Now Jacob volunteers weekly as a supervisor in a churchyard. “Almost no one wants to be sat at home not being productive,” Sa says.

Miguel Sa at Pet-Xi

Doors closing at 19

But recent adult education cuts have “really limited” the study options available to those aged 19 plus, says Jenkinson.

Millie, 20, struggled to find work after her previous level 2 health and social care college course failed to secure her a work placement, as employers demanded prior experience. Spear “made me rediscover myself,” she says. 

She believes “it takes quite a while to know yourself in life”. She was diagnosed with dyslexia and dyscalculia four years ago and had always struggled with reading, but recently discovered a love of books.

She now works happily in a café but would “definitely” return to education and retrain as a music therapist if she could afford it.

Jenkinson says many young people are “delayed in their readiness for college”, often due to Covid. When they finally reach readiness at 20 or 21, “doors are closing as it’s no longer free for them”.

Millie, who benefitted from the Spear programme

Crossley calls the scrapping of traineeships, a pre-apprenticeship 16-24 programme which “created that bridge to help build resilience and communication skills”, a “massive mistake”. Bootcamps, he says, are “too light touch”, and foundation apprenticeships “probably a bit too long”.

Holland worries that much Youth Guarantee funding is going into work placements, but “not necessarily allowing providers to deliver the qualifications those young people need”.

The government is spending £90 million on employability schemes in eight ‘trailblazer’ areas but Resurgo’s CEO Iona Ledwidge, says “so far, we’ve seen little evidence that decisions to fund schemes through this have been based on robust evidence that they work”.  

 “The same applies to the directories that we’ve seen some Jobcentres using when they refer people for support. Schemes should show they work before they get public money.” 

In Greater Manchester, the combined authority says an economic inactivity trailblazer is experiencing “ongoing challenges in data sharing with the DWP” that its mayor Andy Burnham told FE Week he could “talk all afternoon about”. “Cultural barriers” are preventing full exchange of data and limiting visibility of the 4,500 people being supported. 

But for the vulnerable NEETs that St Eds serves, Crossley welcomes the movement of skills across from the Department of Education to the DWP. “They know there are people they service who need help getting out of bed,” he says.

The skills system is broken because we keep fixing it in pieces

Every corner of the skills system has its own crisis. Falling apprenticeship vacancies. Too few T Level placements. A shortage of entry-level jobs for young people. Almost a million 16–24 year old NEETs.

Each issue matters, but only tells part of the story. Employers sit at the heart of these challenges, yet policy treats them in isolation. What’s missing is a joined-up approach that recognises the cumulative effect on business and helps employers see how investing in skills can work for them.

Our members, representing employers of all sizes and sectors, tell us it’s not a lack of willingness to train or employ people but the sheer number of pressures hitting businesses at once.

Increased national insurance, record national minimum wage, escalating materials, energy and transport costs. A higher retirement age keeping the workforce older for longer while the cost of reskilling rises. Add to that the cost-of-living crisis, and many employers are operating with tighter margins and being asked to do more.

AI and automation is changing the nature of work, with a growing demand for digital, data and problem-solving skills. Employers are trying to adapt while keeping their businesses viable.

A record 252 employers took part in this year’s 5% Club audit, representing more than 800,000 employees across 20 industries. Together, they employ over 70,000 people in “earn and learn” roles such as apprenticeships and graduate schemes – 8.7 per cent of their workforce, the highest proportion we’ve ever recorded. Employers remain committed to developing talent, even when times are tough.

For the fifth-year running there’s been a rise in higher and degree-level apprenticeships, typically supporting mid-career reskilling and upskilling – exactly what employers tell us they need most.

But with young NEET numbers growing, government focus is weighted heavily towards this issue. The young population is growing and will continue to do so in the next five years, so we may see NEET levels grow even further.

Employers can ‘t solve this challenge alone. Entry-level roles are declining. Level 2 apprenticeships are at their lowest since the audit commenced, and the expectation is employers will do more. We need to align national need with commercial reality. We have to make it make sense for business to get involved.

Beyond apprentices, for the third consecutive year, employers have reduced the number of formal graduate schemes and placements. The median number of graduates has fallen from 31 in 2024 to just 23 this year, and SMEs expect to cut graduate recruitment by another 6 per cent next year. As competition for graduate roles intensifies, many will apply for lower-level roles that non-graduates might once have secured, pushing those furthest from the labour market even further from opportunity.

Each new initiative – the youth guarantee, foundation apprenticeships or sector-based technical colleges – is created in silo. Employers have to navigate multiple schemes, funding and reporting requirements, each with their own rules and language. This fragmentation is holding everyone back.

 For policymakers, it means every reform has to prove its worth just as the last one starts to settle. For employers, it means more time, money and effort spent navigating a maze of disconnected schemes. For SMEs, that’s near impossible. We will only create enough opportunities for young people if the system is easy for all employers to engage with. Right now, it isn’t.

The problem isn’t just fragmentation; it’s continued change. Apprenticeships are key to many employers’ long-term workforce strategies. We’ve come a long way in building the apprenticeships brand, and further reform cannot undo that work. Wide scale change risks undermining that progress and damaging confidence in both funding stability and programme quality.

It isn’t all doom and gloom. Where employers do engage, results are impressive. More than three-quarters of audited employers reported apprenticeship achievement rates above 90 per cent. Employers going beyond the minimum, investing beyond their levy funds, sharing good practice with other employers and making their apprentices feel they matter, see higher achievement and lasting loyalty.

We need to change the conversation. Instead of designing separate interventions for apprenticeships, T Levels, work experience, bootcamps, apprenticeship units, V Levels or adult learning, we need a single, connected narrative that meets skills needs.

Only then will we unlock the scale of employer participation needed for a truly sustainable, inclusive and future-ready workforce.

If learners don’t feel they belong, they won’t engage

Working in safeguarding means you get to see up close the barriers and setbacks that learners face, but you also see their potential – often long before they do.

That’s why I’m a real advocate of intervention programmes, which many colleges invest in to support learners beyond delivering qualifications. At LSEC, we are running one such initiative – Steps to Success – funded through our ten-year equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) grant project.

It began as a pilot to address achievement gaps, specifically for Black Caribbean males. But we soon saw benefits for a wider cohort. This year, it’s open to all male students wanting to take part. The aim is to help them build confidence and take ownership of their learning journey. We want to help them link their college experience to their wider aspirations – for example, showing how consistent attendance directly improves career prospects.

Our pilot showed promising results. Learners said they felt empowered and supported. It also raised an important question: how do we reach the very hardest to reach learners?

Building connection from the ground up

For me, engagement starts with a natural connection, finding commonality and being relatable. I’ve always had a student-facing role and know this direct contact is crucial. As a safeguarding professional, I work with many learners right from enrolment and gain an in-depth understanding of the challenges they face.

When a young person trusts you enough to open up, you see not just surface issues such as attendance or punctuality but the underlying causes. That insight helps me identify who might benefit most from Steps to Success and how to encourage them to participate. Being present matters: sitting in disciplinary panels, attendance reviews or simply being visible on campus. When students see you are consistently there and genuinely listening, they are far more likely to engage.

A whole-college approach

This work can’t sit in isolation. At LSEC, I collaborate with my safeguarding team, additional learning support (ALS) and curriculum colleagues to provide wraparound support. Our goal is to join up the networks around each learner so they feel supported and, most importantly, that they belong and are cared about.

Encouraging participation also relies on all staff knowing what’s on offer. If tutors, mentors and support teams promote the same opportunities in different contexts, learners hear a consistent message: ‘this is for you’.

Meeting students where they are

We must also recognise this generation’s mindset. Many young people seek instant gratification and respond best when they can see clear, immediate benefits. That might mean offering something small to get them through the door, like a free lunch. Once there, we help them see the longer-term gains – for example, improved self-worth, a sense of direction and hearing a different voice encouraging them along their journey.

Peer encouragement is another powerful motivator. When learners hear success stories from others like them, it hits differently. Hearing “this helped me get back on track” from a peer can break through barriers that staff alone perhaps cannot.

Encouraging accountability and aspiration

Much of my safeguarding work involves helping young people step out of the “shame and blame” cycle – the feeling that things just happen to them. We help them recognise their own agency and take responsibility for their journey.

Reaching out to parents and carers also matters. Even though college isn’t school, families remain an important influence. We send letters home explaining the value of the programme and its goals.

Learning from what works

Finally, evaluation is key. We can’t just assume success because students attend or say they enjoyed it. We track impact carefully – from achievement rates to student feedback – to ensure interventions genuinely make a difference, then can evolve and improve them.

Engaging the hardest-to-reach students boils down to three things:

  • Build heartfelt relatable relationships with learners, including through peers.
  • Invest in enrichment and belonging opportunities. Our recent 3000 Voices research into young people’s wellbeing revealed that this is something they want and need.
  • Ensure every staff member understands the benefits of the programme, making them more inclined to refer those students who they feel will benefit.

We can’t force young people to engage – we want them to want to engage. To do this every opportunity has to feel relevant and rewarding, with students at the very centre of everything we do.

Training across borders works but we risk missing the boat

Transnational education (TNE), traditionally described as education delivered by an institution in one country to learners based in another, has emerged as a powerful model to support internationalisation, access and quality in education. And significant progress has been made in applying TNE in higher education.

But its role and potential in technical and vocational education and training (TVET) remains underexplored.

This is a missed opportunity; TVET has long been central to preparing people for work, entrepreneurship, and lifelong learning.

Across the world, effective skills systems underpin inclusive growth and resilience, especially as societies face rapid technological, environmental and demographic transitions.

Recognising this gap, the British Council commissioned the Edge Foundation, in partnership with the Association of Colleges, to conduct new research Global Skills Partnerships: Exploring Transnational Education in TVET to explore the relevance, impact and models of TNE in TVET, and its potential to contribute to national development and global skills agendas.

Why TNE in TVET matters

The report highlights that TNE in TVET can deliver transformative benefits at multiple levels.

For learners, it expands access to internationally recognised, high-quality training opportunities without the financial burden of studying overseas.

For host countries, it supports improvement of TVET systems, enhances institutional capacity, modernises pedagogy and aligns training provision with national priorities.

For UK providers, it creates opportunities for collaboration, diversification of income and strengthened global engagement, extending the reach and influence of the UK’s technical education expertise.

The research shows that TNE in TVET is delivered through a variety of adaptable models, which often differ from conventional approaches.

Examples include franchise partnerships in hospitality and engineering, as well as co-developed programmes responding to emerging skills needs in renewable energy, health, and social care.

The UK’s FE providers have built strong partnerships with countries across the world, from China and Saudi Arabia to Morocco.

Innovative delivery models, such as blended learning, “flying faculty” arrangements and train-the-trainer approaches, reflect the flexibility and creativity of UK FE and skills providers in adapting to different contexts and markets.

However, the research also acknowledges key challenges. Funding constraints, complex regulatory frameworks and staffing shortages can limit the scalability of TNE in TVET. Sustainable partnerships depend on shared understanding, context-sensitive design, and mutual benefit between home and host institutions.

A moment of opportunity

The demand for TVET has never been stronger. Employers worldwide face acute skills shortages, while young people seek practical, employment-focused education.

Advances in digital technology are making new models of international delivery possible, from micro-credentials to immersive online training.

Although the UK is widely recognised for its expertise in technical and vocational education, only a small number of colleges deliver transnational education.

The report highlights some excellent case studies from colleges across the four nations of the UK that are ahead of the curve in terms of TNE provision, including Cardiff and Vale College, City of Glasgow College and Lincoln College Group.

With the right policy support, the TVET sector could expand its TNE offerings, creating greater opportunities and benefits for learners both in the UK and internationally. By increasing international engagement, UK institutions could play a more active role in shaping global skills ecosystems while strengthening their own practice through cross-border collaboration and knowledge exchange.

The British Council’s role

The British Council, as the UK’s international organisation for cultural relations and educational opportunities, provides research, insights and platforms that can inform discussions around TNE in TVET.

Through initiatives such as Going Global Partnerships, it facilitates evidence gathering and dialogue that may help institutions and policymakers explore international collaboration and innovation in TVET.

The opportunity presented by TNE in TVET is significant and this research is just the opening chapter.

It calls on policymakers, institutions and partners to engage in a collective effort to build frameworks that enable sustainable TNE in TVET, to invest in international capacity-building, and to champion the role of vocational education in tackling shared global challenges.

White paper’s details pose a devilish problem for FE admin

In HG Wells’ War of the Worlds, the intellectually and technologically superior aliens did not achieve their strategic ambitions, because they forgot the small matter of their vaccinations for travel to Earth.  Good or bad, intentions are quite often scuppered by a failure to think through the details.  If the ambitions in the post-16 white paper are to be realised we must not overlook those small things that could trip up implementation.

Any white paper denotes implicit criticism of what has gone before.  The success measures in the paper make it clear that a quality model based on Ofsted grades and student achievement rates (two areas where colleges have performed strongly) has not been fit for purpose.  This is because it omitted a key focus on student volumes.  The sector has not enrolled enough of those not in education, employment or training (NEETs), enough learners at Levels 4 and 5, and enough learners in key occupational areas.

As a result, the white paper proposes some revolutionary ideas to address these failures such as auto-enrolment of 16-year-old NEETs and a complete overhaul of the vocational curriculum, including new V Levels.

The success of these proposals will be determined by how well we address their very considerable resource implications for college student data, exams and timetabling teams.

Colleges process millions of enrolments annually, and every extra field or keystroke added to the enrolment process therefore has a real and significant cost.

Enrolling all 16-year-old NEETs at a default college might mean entering data for 300-plus people who have not shown the slightest interest in that institution, let alone express a view on a preferred qualification.  Getting them on the system, only to then remove or amend those records is a real extra burden.  Funding follows the learner, so there is no compensation for that work.

Similarly, the overhaul of the curriculum means an entire re-coding exercise.  If Pearson’s dominance at Level 3 is replaced by a more diverse range of awarding bodies, then exams staff will need retraining to understand the systems and processes of the new bodies.  The scale of the changes also increases the risk of coding errors.

V Levels are much smaller than BTECs.  A programme of study made up of three V Levels means more choices, more combinations, more invigilation and more (probably smaller) classes too.  Some V Level combinations may stray across existing college department boundaries, which could have serious implications for timetabling. Three V Levels also requires three times the volume of curriculum coding input compared to a single BTEC.

Colleges are much bigger than schools and have a much greater variety of educational activities.  Timetabling is very different as a result.  Colleges do not generally want all students to have the same breaks because it places an impossible burden on canteens, toilets and social spaces. Changes to the maths and English curriculum also mean a cohort studying the same main qualification will need breaking into smaller cohorts for those taking different maths and English qualifications, adding to the complexity.  Resolving these difficulties will be critical to successful change.  It is unlikely that the extra workload can simply be absorbed.

You may remember in 2013 the elegant new London skyscraper known as the Walkie Talkie building was found to have a design fault, with its concave glass acting as a mirror directing a beam of light so hot that it melted the cars below. It was a detail that no-one had considered before.  If we want the white paper proposals to help students reach for the skies, let’s attend to the detail and make sure we properly resource our data and exams teams, so they avoid a very different sort of burnout.

Confidence, curiosity, and connection: How colleges are building learners for life

The tools to succeed

Data from Perspectives, Pearson’s first-ever college report, shows that two-thirds of students in England (65%) feel they will be ready to move on to their next steps by the end of their course, while more than half of tutors (54%) say their students are genuinely engaged in learning. The report also found a widely shared appetite for education that balances wellbeing and ambition, giving students the tools to succeed in work and life. However, just 29% of students told us they enjoy applying what they learn, while a third (33%) enjoy discovering new things.

For tutors, the priority is clear: help students develop problem-solving skills, communication, collaboration, self-confidence and a growth mindset that reframes ‘failure’ as valuable – all qualities Perspectives identified as most important for 16- to 18-year-olds.

The Newcastle and Stafford Colleges Group (NSCG) exemplify the report’s findings in action. “We’ve got a number of initiatives to help students develop confidence and life skills,” says Gavin Barker, assistant principal for Teaching, Learning and Quality, “but honestly, a lot of it happens every day through skilful teaching, learning and assessment.

“We’re lucky to have a really skilled team of teachers and a pastoral tutor system that’s a bit different from other colleges,” he adds. “Our personal tutors only tutor. Their role is to support students’ development and act as a key point of contact. Because of this, they’re very well equipped to spot if a student is struggling with their wellbeing.”

Connecting learning to the real world

In Perspectives, students’ answers put “developing skills [to] use in everyday life” at the top of the most important reasons for learning, yet only 21% feel what they learn is relevant to their everyday experiences.  With life after the classroom understandably a major preoccupation for college students (almost four in 10 are worried about getting a job or progressing in their role), the findings suggest that grounding more subjects in wider world contexts could be the solution.

“Work experience and industry placements are a huge part of what we do,” Gavin from NSCG tells us, and are key to helping students see the everyday relevance of their learning. Every student, regardless of level or course, completes at least 24 hours of work experience. Ideally, it’s in the field they want to progress into, but sometimes it’s more about developing wider skills – for example, working in a charity shop to build confidence and customer service.”

Placements like this, as well as other initiatives like guest speakers, help students connect the classroom to life beyond it, reinforcing Perspectives’ finding that practical relevance is a powerful driver of engagement.

A drive towards digital skills

The report also looked at the transformational impact of technology, seeing responses that underscore both the importance of preparing students for rapidly changing careers and the recognition of digital literacy as a core life skill.

Through Perspectives, as many as 6 in 10 tutors are calling for curriculum reform to embed digital and AI skills, with 58% believing AI will have a positive impact on vocational job prospects in the future.

“One of the biggest misconceptions is that all young people are digitally skilled,” says Gavin Barker. “They’re confident on phones, but many struggle with Excel, PowerPoint or Word. Part of our job is ensuring they leave with those essential digital skills for higher education or employment.”

Yet there are clear gaps to be addressed among those teaching: while 6 in 10 (61%) feel confident in their own ability to help students develop digital skills for the workplace, many tutors feel they need additional support to confidently embed AI and technology into lessons.

At NSCG, leadership is tackling this issue by appointing a digital technologist across its colleges. Their role? “[To] help staff and students build digital confidence, with AI being a key focus.” Gavin adds: “It’s about helping students understand how to use AI ethically and effectively, and supporting staff to use it to enhance teaching, learning, and assessment.”

Life skills for lifelong success

Transferable skills – including creativity, critical thinking, teamwork and resilience – are seen as critical qualities too, Perspectives responses showed. A number of colleges have found proactive ways to teach them. NSCG’s Skill Up, Stand Out initiative is just one example.

“Three times a year, students assess themselves against ten key skills we’ve identified using local and national intelligence about what employers need,” says Gavin. “These include communication, confidence, critical thinking, digital skills, literacy, numeracy, resilience, technical skills, time management and teamwork. Tutors then use this information to adapt teaching – so if a group is struggling with teamwork, for instance, we’ll embed more group activities. It’s a way to make those transferable skills visible and intentional.”

By combining structured skills tracking with everyday learning, colleges can offer students vital tools to navigate interactions and experiences. Doing so aligns directly with one of  Perspectives’ key conclusions: that life skills and wellbeing are key to preparing students not only for their next academic steps or first job, but for lifelong success.

Preparing students for tomorrow

The discoveries of the report make it clear that colleges do so much more than meet basic course and qualification requirements. The value they place on life skills, digital literacy and opportunities for real-world connections shows tutors’ deep care for fostering confident, curious, capable learners.

What can this look like in practice? Colleges like NSGC are giving us their version of what’s possible. Alongside them, Pearson is here to translate research and insights into tangible change and experiences, helping prepare every student for a future of opportunities.

Explore the report

New Ofsted inspection process is FE sector’s ‘chance to shine’, says Oliver

Ofsted’s refreshed approach to inspection and new focus on inclusion represents a “chance to shine” for the FE sector, chief inspector Sir Martyn Oliver has told college leaders.

New inspections under the reformed report cards system began last week.

Overall headline grades have been removed and the watchdog will now grade colleges in up to 16 individual areas – including inclusion for the first time – on a five-point scale from ‘exceptional’, ‘strong standard’ and ‘expected standard’ to ‘needs attention’ and ‘urgent improvement’.

Speaking to the Association of Colleges conference today, Oliver praised colleges as “among the most inclusive institutions in our entire education system”, highlighting their work with young carers, adults returning after long breaks from education, and learners with specialist needs.

Despite “no set definition of disadvantage at post-16”, he said, colleges “find ways to make education work for everyone who comes through your doors”.

“This, alongside recognising inclusion in our refreshed approach to inspection, is a chance for your sector to shine,” Oliver said. “It’s an opportunity to have your excellent work – work that’s been happening for some time, often without due recognition – properly acknowledged and celebrated.”

He added: “We want to support you to continue to be inclusive while driving achievement. These refreshed inspections should feel like recognition.”

From ‘best fit’ to ‘secure fit’

Oliver said the new inspection methodology responds directly to college sector feedback, particularly criticisms of inconsistent judgments under the previous “best fit” approach.

He acknowledged that “the definition of ‘best fit’ was creating confusion and, frankly, frustration” and that colleges felt “different inspectors were interpreting the framework differently”. 

“‘Secure fit’ brings a more robust, consistent approach to making judgments,” he said. “It means clearer criteria that everyone can understand and work towards. It’s more rigorous – and I make no apologies for that. But, crucially, it’s also clearer, fairer and more human.”

‘No read across’ from old grading system

Oliver also addressed misunderstandings about Ofsted’s new grades, stressing that the system is not comparable to the old one.

“There is no read across from the old judgments to the new grades. We are starting over,” he said. 

He described the new “expected standard” as “a high bar”, reflecting expectations set by government, and insisted that achieving it represents “a job well done”.

Ofsted is working to communicate the new grades to parents and learners, including green colour coding to indicate that “hitting ‘expected standard’ means you are good to go”.

Oliver said if providers achieve above expected standard, then “you really are flying”.

“Strong standard marks out excellent practice. Anything graded ‘exceptional’ is exactly that – truly among the very best nationally.”

He insisted the ‘needs attention’ is not the same as ‘requires improvement’ under the old system: “It is not a fail – that’s important – but it is an indication that there is work to be done.”

“This grade is about catching things before they become bigger problems,” he added, describing it as an “opportunity” and “a catalyst for improvement”. Oliver stressed that colleges should not be surprised by such findings: “We shouldn’t be shining a light on anything you haven’t already identified.”

Revised monitoring will allow quicker re-grading, he added: “If you address the areas that need attention, we can recognise that improvement promptly – and turn the amber to green.”

First report cards batch published

At an AoC breakout session this afternoon, Denise Olander, Ofsted’s acting deputy director of post-16 education and training, said the first report card reports will be published after Christmas and released in batches.

“We started inspections last week, and they went really well. We were pleased with them. But we will not be sharing our report cards until after Christmas,” Olander said.

“We will batch publish so those that go first don’t feel exposed. There’ll be a huge amount of reports that will be published from January onwards. So you won’t see anything in the public domain until then.”

Finalists revealed for 2025 Good for Me Good for FE awards

Staff and student volunteers, fundraisers and social action campaigners have been shortlisted for this year’s Good for Me Good for FE awards.

The finalists were unveiled on the main stage at the Association of Colleges annual conference in Birmingham this morning by Good for Me Good for FE co-founder and CEO Elevare Civic Education Group Sam Parrett and AoC chief executive David Hughes.

Now in their third year, the awards – sponsored by NCFE, The Skills Network and FE Associates – recognise colleges’ social impact and the millions of pounds of social value generated through community action. 

The 24 finalists announced today will be invited to a special House of Lords reception hosted by Baroness Nicky Morgan, taking place on December 5, where the winners will be announced. 

Parrett said: “The independent judging panel noted that the standard of entries was extremely high, reflecting the inspirational social action that is taking place at colleges across the country. 

“These amazing individuals and teams not only give their time to help others, they represent everything that the FE sector stands for: deeply embedded in their communities, with colleges acting as true anchor institutions.”

Good for Me Good for FE awards 2025 finalists:

  • Individual fundraiser of the year:
    James Shields (Loughborough College Group); Robert Smith (Dudley College of Technology); Loui Frost (Cheshire College South and West)
  • Team/college fundraiser of the year:
    Waltham Forest College; City College Plymouth; Queen Mary’s College
  • Student volunteer of the year:
    Autumn Barker (North Hertfordshire College); Olivia Cook (Lincoln College); Sultan Arel (East Coast College)
  • Staff volunteer of the year:
    Emma Shipstone (Nottingham College); Lewis O’Callaghan (MidKent College); Lisa Whait (Loughborough College Group)
  • Volunteering project of the year:
    Clair Firth (Leeds City College); Rebecca Myrie (Milton Keynes College); Autonomy Project (Sunderland College)
  • Volunteering accreditation excellence:
    Nottingham College; USP College; MidKent College
  • Inspirational role model of the year:
    Emma Shipstone (Nottingham College); Kerry Amos (USP College); Danny Lee (Loughborough College Group)
  • Outstanding long service award for volunteering:
    Frances Fahy (SGS College); Lisa Humphries (Chichester College); Ric Holmes (East Coast College)

UCU ballot results: 32 colleges vote to strike over pay and workload

Teachers at 32 further education colleges have voted to strike following the University and College Union (UCU)’s England-wide ballot over pay and workloads.

UCU members in 32 of the 68 colleges passed the required 50 per cent turnout threshold and backed strike action. The union’s further education committee will meet on Friday to sign off on next steps. 

A further 17 colleges avoided strike action during the ballot window after agreeing new pay deals worth up to 8.7 per cent. 

UCU said 90 per cent of their voting members supported strike action.

The ballot followed the “disappointing” 4 per cent pay rise recommendation from the Association of Colleges earlier this year. 

Jo Grady, UCU general secretary said: “College staff have turned out in huge numbers to show they are willing to down tools in the fight for decent pay and decent working conditions. 

“Thanks to the pressure of our strike ballots, we have also won pay deals at a further 17 colleges. Other college bosses now need to look at those institutions, make staff fair offers that help close the pay gap between school and college teachers, and avoid the disruption of strike action.”

The union’s ‘new deal for FE’ campaign includes pay parity with school teachers, a national workload agreement and binding national bargaining.

College teachers earn, on average, £9,000 less than their counterparts in schools, according to UCU. 

David Hughes, chief executive of the Association of Colleges, said: “I am disappointed to see college staff voting for strike action, and I hope it doesn’t come to fruition as it’s the students who will suffer.

“AoC and college leaders have shown over many years now how committed they are to improving pay and conditions, as far as their funding will allow. We know, as do the unions, that any campaigning and action really needs to be directed nationally to secure commitments and investment from government to address the pay gap with schools and industry.

“That’s why we today launched our adult learning pays campaign. A campaign we hope the unions can get behind, because we need to put right the decimation of college funding we saw in the 2010s.”

Colleges where UCU members voted for strike action:

1. Abingdon & Witney College

2. Barnet & Southgate College

3. Bournemouth and Poole College of FE

4. Bradford College

5. Brockenhurst College

6. Capital City College

7. Chesterfield College

8. City College Norwich

9. City of Bristol College

10. City of Liverpool College

11. City of Portsmouth College

12. City of Wolverhampton College

13. East Sussex College Group

14. Hugh Baird College

15. Isle of Wight College

16. Kirklees College

17. Lakes College West Cumbria

18. Lancaster and Morecambe College

19. Loughborough College Group

20. Morley College

21. New College Swindon

22. Runshaw College

23. SK College Group

24. South & City College

25. South Bank Colleges

26. Stanmore College

27. The Sheffield College

28. Truro & Penwith College

29. Windsor Forest Colleges Group

30. Wirral Met College

31. WM College

32. York College

Colleges securing pay deals during the ballot window:

1. Bath College

2. Bishop Auckland College

3. Bolton College

4. Bury College

5. Cambridge Regional College

6. Chichester College Group

7. Coastland College

8. Ealing, Hammersmith and West London College

9. East Lancashire Learning Group

10. Gateshead College

11. Hopwood Hall College

12. Milton Keynes College

13. Petroc

14. South Gloucestershire & Stroud College

15. Stoke on Trent College

16. UCS College Group

17. Vision West Nottinghamshire College