Fewer share prosperity when UKSPF ends in March

Only the UK’s most deprived areas will benefit from a post-Brexit fund for local skills, business and community projects – cutting hundreds of councils off from money to help marginalised people.

The UK Shared Prosperity Fund (UKSPF), which ends on March 31, was launched by the Conservative government in 2022 to compensate for the loss of £1.5 billion per year in EU regional social and development funding.

But details published alongside last month’s budget revealed the extent of Labour’s “new approach” to regional investment, splitting funding into two programmes and sidelining the UKSPF’s “people and skills” priority.

It follows the end of the Multiply numeracy programme for adults in March, which was estimated to have cost about £250 million since 2022-23.

Councillor Tom Hunt, chair of the Local Government Association’s inclusive growth committee, said the end of UKSPF would impact councils’ ability to deliver skills and employment support.

He urged ministers to provide programmes that “combine support for local employability, skills, and health initiatives to replace relevant parts of UKSPF before it comes to an end.”

Although Labour’s new approach to regional investment was confirmed in broad terms in June with the 2025 spending review, details of how funding would be distributed were only fully revealed in recent weeks.

Local Growth Fund

The largest programme, the Local Growth Fund (LGF), accounts for an average of about £225 million per year until 2029-30, shared out between 11 mayoral strategic authorities in England’s north and midlands.

From March, the LGF will follow the same principles as UKSPF, with mayors asked to spend the funding on people and skills initiatives, local infrastructure or business support.

However, the fund’s overall budget is 75 per cent less than the £915 million available via UKSPF in England in 2024-25, and its focus on 11 strategic authorities will mean more than 150 local authorities are cut off from annual allocations of £327,000 to £61 million, depending on their size and deprivation levels.

The government has also dictated that from 2026-27 to 2028-29 the share of LGF cash that can be spent on revenue will fall from 75 to 42 per cent.

The Industrial Communities Alliance, a group representing local authorities in industrial areas of the UK, said the change “runs contrary” to the government’s objectives of promoting jobs and will have “knock-on consequences” for the estimated 4,000 jobs the UKSPF supports in England.

The geographical spread of LGF has also disappointed politicians outside the north and midlands, including mayor of Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Paul Bristow, who criticised the government’s “spreadsheet-driven approach”.

He said leaving his region out of the LGF was a “mistake” that denied investment which would help drive local growth.

Bristow added: “The funding criteria includes being under the UK average for GDP per capita, which sees Cambridgeshire and Peterborough just miss out.

“This spreadsheet-driven approach fails to recognise the reality on the ground where the relative affluence of Greater Cambridge skews regional averages.

“We have areas in Cambridgeshire and Peterborough which come well under national average metrics for health and wealth and need investment to change the story.”

A spokesperson for the Greater London Authority (GLA), which will lose out on about £63 million a year, told FE Week that the mayor’s team is developing options to continue supporting businesses.

Pride in Place

The second programme, Pride in Place, will invest £5 billion over the next 10 years in 350 of the “most deprived” neighbourhoods, doling out about £400 million per year in England once it is up and running.

Pride in Place claims to be a “new way” for government to work with neighbourhood boards in “left behind” communities, promising to spend £20 million in each area over a decade, with the core objectives of building stronger communities, creating “thriving places”, and empowering people to “take back control”.

While this programme could fund skills and employment-focused initiatives, its other priorities threaten to “squeeze out these vital activities,” the Industrial Communities Alliance warned.

The association criticised Pride in Place for its “top-down” approach to distributing funding that focuses on statistical boundaries that “don’t match neighbourhoods on the ground” and were decided without consulting local authorities.

The Treasury and Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government did not respond to repeated requests for comment.

‘At odds’ with government priorities

Sam Avanzo Windett, deputy director of the Learning and Work Institute, said the new programmes had put “vital” support for marginalised people outside mainstream services “in question”.

She added: “With the move from the [European Social Fund], combined into UKSPF, and now rolled into plans for a Local Growth Fund only in specified areas, the future of these services is uncertain.

“With a patchwork of initiatives in place, some organisations will be facing a cliff edge and vital frontline expertise will be disappearing.

“At a time when economic inactivity is a pressing concern, any decision to reduce funding to help groups with more complex barriers into employment seems at odds with the government’s aim to reach an 80 per cent employment rate.”

Deals end January strike threat at three colleges

Strikes at three colleges have been called off after teachers agreed to pay awards of between 4 and 7 per cent.

Thousands of University and College Union (UCU) members had voted to down tools this January over pay, working conditions and a demand for national pay bargaining.

But lecturers have in recent days settled their disputes at Lakes College, Runshaw College and York College.

It means 30 colleges are left facing strikes on January 14, 15 and 16, when several vocational and technical exams take place.

UCU opened a nationwide ballot in October after the “disappointing” 4 per cent pay rise recommendation from the Association of Colleges earlier this year.

Union members at 33 of the 54 balloted colleges passed the legally required 50 per cent turnout threshold and backed strike action, demanding pay parity with school teachers, a national workload agreement and binding national bargaining.

Twenty-one colleges failed to meet the threshold, and now 20 colleges have settled their disputes with deals worth up to 8.7 per cent.

Staff in the north step back…

The strike at York College was called off shortly after the ballot results were published in late November. Members accepted a 5 per cent pay award, as well as joint negotiations over workload for 2025-26.

An agreement for a 7 per cent pay rise at Runshaw College, in Leyland, Lancashire, shortly followed.

UCU and Unison members, who represent non-teaching FE staff, will see their pay packages rise in line with sixth-form workers in the new year.

Clare Russell, Runshaw College principal, said: “This uplift brings the top of the main teacher pay scale to £51,714, aligning salaries with those in sixth form colleges, first achieved when we introduced our current teaching staff pay scale in 2023.

“This award has been made possible through strong financial management, buoyant student recruitment and efficient curriculum planning. More than 80 per cent of our income comes from 16- to 18- provision, an area that has benefited from increased national investment.

“We recognise that many colleges rely far more heavily on adult funding, which has been constrained for many years, and we fully support the sector’s national campaign for improved investment in adult education.”

The latest agreement, made earlier this week, was a 4 per cent salary increase for teachers at Lakes College, in Workington, Cumbria, backdated to August.

Chris Robinson, UCU northern representative, said staff had voted to strike through “frustration” that no pay offer was on the table before the national ballot.

“Lakes College only put something on the table just as the ballot was about to close and just as we got over the threshold,” he told FE Week.

Mark Fell, principal of Lakes College, told FE Week that discussions on workload agreements were ongoing.

Jo Grady, general secretary of UCU, said: “We have now resolved our dispute at 20 colleges and, to avoid disruption on campus come the New Year, leaders at colleges where we are still in dispute need to make meaningful offers and show they value their staff.”

…but strikes go on in Capital City

College staff at Capital City strike over pay, workload and bargaining

Meanwhile, FE and sixth form staff at Capital City College (CCC) walked out this week as tensions with senior management escalated over pay and “ripped up” legacy sixth form conditions.

UCU and NEU members, who represent around 60 sixth form lecturers at CCC’s Angel campus – formerly known as City and Islington College, conducted a coordinated two-day strike across the group’s 11 sites in London.

NEU members have had 14 days of industrial action since October over CCC’s “intolerable” plans to freeze sixth-form teacher salaries for two to three years to bring them in line with FE lecturers.

“For the last 30-odd years, we’ve had these conditions despite being part of a bigger further education college,” said Nick Lawson, NEU rep at CCC.

“The college has unilaterally ripped those up, and we want to be returned to our national pay and conditions.

“We’re marching separately but striking together.”

Jeremy Corbyn also attended the picket line at the college group’s Finsbury Park campus, which is located in the MP’s Islington North constituency. Corbyn also lent his support to the UCU’s recent Parliamentary lobby efforts to seek a reversal of adult education funding cuts.

Meanwhile, UCU rep Mustafa Turus said the union’s branch had sought additional industrial action before the end of term.

Members rejected a pay offer of 4 per cent, a 4.5 per cent rise for those on a salary of £25,000 or less, and a one-off payment of £200-250 for those earning £34,000 or less.

Leaders also offered to set up a workload committee, which Turus said was not a tangible solution.

“We cannot wait months and months, if not years, for a workload committee to come to address our urgent concerns,” he said.

CCC declined to comment.

AoC quids in after £9m cash windfall

The Association of Colleges (AoC) has cashed in a £9 million windfall after ditching a pension fund that posed a “significant risk” to its financial stability.

The membership body’s newly published 2025 annual accounts reveal it agreed a settlement with the London Pension Fund Authority after taking the “difficult decision” to remove its employees from the defined-benefit scheme.

The scheme was in deficit for many years, reaching a peak of minus-£21 million in 2021 which meant the college body was technically insolvent.

But following improvements in market conditions, including an increase in interest rates, meant the AoC could exit with a £9.44 million surplus.

Chair Shaid Mahmood (pictured, right) said: “The AoC was technically insolvent for a significant number of years due to the LPFA pension liability.

“Once the LPFA moved to a surplus in 2024, the board discussed the option to withdraw in order to remove the risk and secure AoC’s financial security.

“We had long and detailed discussions across a number of board meetings, giving significant consideration to various options and taking into account the impact on those members of staff who were in the pension.”

The move required the agreement of about half the association’s 148 staff body who were signed up to the scheme.

Hughes enters the £200k club

The 2024-25 accounts also revealed that AoC chief executive David Hughes’ (pictured, left) basic salary grew 5 per cent to £205,905.

This places his salary in the same group as 12 college principals whose basic salary was £200,000 or more per year in the 2023-24 financial year.

Mahmood said: “The remuneration of our chief executive is determined by the remuneration committee which considers performance and impact as well as the market rate for senior, national roles like this one in the same way we set pay at all levels.”

‘Principal risk’

Annual accounts for the college body show its board viewed the pension liability as the only “principal risk” to its financial stability.

The AoC’s fund had suffered a high deficit due to financial reporting standard (FRS) rule 102, which governs how pension liabilities and assets must be accounted for by companies.

This included the association’s lack of security that could be “offset” against the pension deficit, said Mahmood.

The board had chosen to over-pay pension contributions for several years to reduce the liability.

According to its accounts for the year to March 2025, the AoC held £5.4 million in its profit and loss account, a 20 per cent increase on the previous year, and £9.4 million in its pension reserve, a 100 per cent increase.

The London Pension Fund Authority was set up in 1989, has about £8 billion in assets, nearly 100,000 members and 115 contributing employers.

Staff agreed voluntarily

Mahmood said AoC staff were offered two options: either a LPFA defined-benefit pension that required employee contributions based on their salary level, or a defined contribution scheme that did not require contributions.

Defined-benefit pensions offer a guaranteed income for life based on an employee’s salary at or near retirement, and how long they have been in a scheme.

They are generally viewed as more lucrative than defined contribution pensions, which provide an income based on how much the employee and employer invest, and how well those investments perform.

Staff in the LPFA scheme are understood to have “voluntarily” agreed to the change after the AoC offered an “alternative defined-contribution rate” as part of their agreement to exit.

About £1.9 million has been ring-fenced from the £9.4 million to fund this.

Mahmood added: “Our new pension offer for all staff was enhanced and is a good benefit which we are proud to offer.”

Following staff approval, it took LPFA 10 months to undertake the “complex process” to calculate the final settlement.

How will AoC spend the cash?

The AoC has set up a reserves and investment sub-committee to manage its “enhanced reserves” and will share further details “in the new year”.

Mahmood said: “As a board, we are clear the reserves should be utilised carefully to both secure the long-term future of the AoC so that it can continue its work to address current member priorities as well as the position of the sector with government and in wider society.”

The AoC currently represents 191 college members.

A spokesperson for LPFA said: “The LPFA reported a 128 per cent funding level at its last Valuation in 2022 and whilst the 2025 valuation is not yet complete, we expect to report a surplus once again.

“Our latest annual report, published last month, reports consistent year-on-year growth.

“It is not for the LPFA to comment on the benefits the Association of Colleges decides to provide for its employees, but we continue to support employers that provide benefits under the Local Government Pension Scheme.”

Eton gets go-ahead to develop 2 of 3 elite sixth forms

Two “elite” sixth forms proposed by Eton College and Star Academies have been approved, while the government blocked a third.

The trio of post-16 colleges – in Dudley, Oldham and Teesside – were submitted under the previous Conservative government and placed under review last year after Labour took office.

An updated pipeline list confirms that Eton Star Dudley and Eton Star Oldham were both marked to “continue in pre-opening”, meaning they will move forward to the next stage of development. However, Eton Star Teesside has been “minded to cancel”, effectively terminating that proposal though an appeal is possible.

The Department for Education said it chose to only approve new schools and sixth forms that provided a “unique offer for students who would otherwise not get it, without damaging the viability of existing local schools and colleges”.

Sir Hamid Patel, chief executive of Star Academies, said the trust was “delighted” two of its three Eton sixth forms had been confirmed.

“We understand the rationale for not progressing the other project and will look at alternative ways we can create opportunities for young people in those communities,” he added.

Eton College and Star Academies had previously argued their sixth form model would boost aspiration in areas with limited access to high-quality post-16 provision. Critics, however, warned about selective admissions and the risk of diverting resources from existing local colleges and schools.

Principals of Dudley’s three post-16 providers issued a joint response questioning the DfE’s approval of an elite sixth form in their area.

Diana Martin of Dudley College of Technology, Jacquie Carman of Halesowen College, and Holly Bembridge of King Edward VI College, Stourbridge, said: “As leaders of colleges already delivering fantastic outcomes and supporting students of all abilities to reach their potential, we question the decision to prioritise a new selective sixth form in our borough.

“While we welcome investment in education, we think that additional selective capacity is not the answer to Dudley’s specific challenges. The borough currently has one of the highest rates of young people not engaged in education or employment in the West Midlands.

“We believe that public time, money, and attention should be laser-focused on engaging these young people, rather than duplicating provision that already exists and thrives.”

One UTC approved, another axed

The DfE’s announcement had contrasting fortunes for two university technical college (UTC) bids.

Doncaster UTC – Health Sciences and Green Technologies, led by Brighter Futures Learning Partnership Trust, has been allowed to proceed. It will be Doncaster’s second UTC after one specialising in digital and science engineering was opened in 2020.

But UTC Southampton, sponsored by UTC Portsmouth, was canned.

Kate Ambrosi, CEO of the Baker Dearing Education Trust, the charity which represents UTCs, said she was “thrilled” that a second UTC in Doncaster would go ahead but was “naturally disappointed” by the Southampton decision.

“Like the new Doncaster UTC, this would have provided life-changing opportunities to young people in a very deprived area. It would have also helped meet an immense demand for places at UTC Portsmouth,” Ambrosi said, adding that the UTC’s backers would be appealing to the Department for Education for a review of this decision.

In total, 28 of the 44 mainstream free school proposals in the pipeline have been approved (see the full list here).

MOVERS AND SHAKERS: EDITION 517

Diana Bird

Executive Principal, Leeds City College

Start date: Spring 2026

Previous Job: Principal and CEO, Shipley College

Interesting fact: Diana’s career in education started teaching ESOL for two hours a week at her local FE college


Daniel Grimes

Assistant Principal: Quality and Student Experience, Leeds College of Building

Start date: January 2026

Previous Job: Head of Quality Improvement, Leeds College of Building

Interesting fact: Daniel was on an episode of ITV’s The Chase where he made it to the final round, but was knocked out by the comedian and talented quiz ‘chaser’ Paul Sinha


Carl Riding

Principal and CEO, Truro and Penwith College

Start date: March 2026

Previous Job: Vice Principal – Employer Partnerships and Adult Provision, NSCG

Interesting fact: Carl has held an Anfield season ticket for 45 years, which he is now planning on passing on to the kids

Sloan in at the deep end: Liam Sloan, Bolton College CEO

Liam Sloan greets me at the doors to Bolton College where he welcomes his students every morning. He has the warmth and immaculate tailoring of a man determined to make a good first impression and the firm handshake of one unafraid of high-pressure challenges. 

After eight years spent running colleges in New Zealand and Australia, Sloan returned to our shores a year ago to take over Bolton College, which was reeling from a ‘requires improvement’ downgrade and financial turmoil.

Only weeks into the job, he found himself blindsided by the allegations of financial misconduct and racism engulfing its parent university. 

But for now, as he ushers me inside to buy me a coffee, his focus is fixed on other matters; making Bolton “the jewel in the crown of the FE sector”.

Liam Sloan with FE Week’s Jessica Hill

A Māori welcome

Sloan’s welcoming gestures are not just because he is endowed with Scottish charm; they carry special meaning as his equivalent to a Pōwhiri,a traditional welcoming ceremony given by the Māori in New Zealand.

Upon moving there in 2016 and starting as executive director of learning, teaching and quality at Nelson Marlborough Institute of Technology (he became CEO a year later), he was not allowed to set foot on campus until he received the chant. He tells me he feels the hairs on his arms stand up as he recalls the Māori embracing him to “please come help us with the challenges we are facing in education”. 

NMIT held an ethos of “what’s right for Māori is right for anyone, because they’re the most disadvantaged”.

Their “very inclusive” attitude changed how he “valued and embraced people”, reflected in how he talks about his learners now: “I try to pay as much attention to the T Level learner with a great GCSE profile as trying to retain someone on 40 per cent attendance,” he says.

Sloan found Australia’s treatment of its indigenous people “shocking” in comparison.

He is taking the Pōwhiri example of creating positive first impressions to overhaul his staff induction processes, which are currently a “weakness” of the college.

Mundane form-filling and health and safety checks are to be done online in advance, freeing up time on an employee’s first day for “meeting the leadership team” and being shown that “we’re grateful you chose us”.

Sloan’s dapper ensemble – a pocket square paired with a floral tie and grey waistcoat – is a nod to his past; he began his career in fashion retail. He joined C&A’s graduate management scheme after studying business and human resources at Huddersfield University.

After managing stores in Nottingham and Northampton, he returned to Huddersfield for teacher training, working evenings managing Barnsley College’s training restaurant before taking on his first full-time teaching role at Doncaster College.

His principal then was George Holmes, who subsequently became vice-chancellor of the University of Bolton (now Greater Manchester) and, 26 years later, was once again Sloan’s boss.

Sign outside the University of Greater Manchester; you can still see the words scrubbed out of its previous name, the University of Bolton

Holmes and investigations

On Sloan’s first day at Bolton last December, Holmes gathered his staff to introduce the new principal before declaring to much “cheering and clapping” that they had just received government approval to change their name to University of Greater Manchester.

This did not go down well with neighbouring universities; the University of Manchester described it as “very misleading and confusing”.

But Holmes was “one of the attractions of the job” for Sloan, who assumed the group’s unusual HE-FE structure meant he would have an “understanding of the importance of colleges” and would be “somebody that I can sound board off…because it’s a very lonely job otherwise”.

Holmes seemed to be at the top of his game. After 20 years in the role, the previous financial year the group’s remuneration committee had raised his pay package from £340,954 to £359,592 (despite the group making 82 staff cuts) on the grounds that “thanks to [his] leadership, his extraordinarily successful wilful institutional building and his financial foresight, the university is potentially well placed to weather the storm generated by many fierce headwinds”.

Holmes was then suspended in May with two senior staff after Greater Manchester Police revealed they were investigating “allegations of financial irregularities”, with the Serious Fraud Office also reportedly involved.

The Office for Students is now examining whether the university had “adequate and effective management and governance arrangements” in place. The regulator found in June it had breached registration conditions by awarding computing courses delivered by Bradford College that were “not assessed effectively”.

The university also commissioned its own internal investigation, led by PricewaterhouseCoopers. Its findings have not been shared with Sloan, who is keen to distance his college from the controversy enveloping the wider group.

In his previous role, Sloan was provost of Federation University Australia and CEO of Tertiary and Further Education (TAFE).

This left him “very much in the middle of the bureaucracy of being in a university”, so he is “grateful” now to be “at arm’s length” from that world.

“I don’t envy not knowing what’s going on… I’ve got so much to do here,” he says. 

But he is not entirely disentangled from it, as his college board must gain approval from the university group for its decisions, including their annual budget. 

Liam Sloan, Bolton College

Financial turnaround

In the year to July 2024, the university group racked up a £4.1 million deficit, and its college a £864,000 deficit, the latter being partly blamed on “market-fuelled staff shortages and spiralling agency costs”. The college also has a £6.6 million loan for building works, and in February its audit committee raised concerns over potential funding errors in a learner recruitment audit.

Following a meeting with the Department for Education, Bolton’s financial health was re-audited from ‘requires improvement’ to ‘inadequate’.

Determined to be “transparent” about their challenges, Sloan invited the FE Commissioner’s team in to provide governance support and conduct a health check.

He “enjoyed working with them”. 

“As long as you’re clear around what support you want and don’t need… then we create boundaries,” he says.

The college’s financial fortunes have turned a corner since then, with a £2.2 million surplus delivered last year and the same forecast this year.

This is partly thanks to a smaller reliance on external agency staff. The group created a subsidiary, Bolton Talent Solutions, which provides 85 per cent of the college’s agency workers. It had an average of 111 in-house agency staff last year, almost half of whom have since become college employees.

The subsidiary means the group can do its own staff vetting, without paying hefty £6,000 finder fees. Agency spend dropped from £4.2 million to £2 million last year, with Sloan targeting £1.7 million this year. 

Sloan with Aboriginal artwork in his office: the dots represent people coming together to form communities 

The change agent

Sloan sees himself as a “change agent” and a “driver to get the best”. 

NMIT moved from 13th out of 16 colleges to first in New Zealand’s league tables, and in Australia, his university moved up from eighth to third during his tenure.

He is now determined to make his college “somewhere where people say, ‘if we’re looking for exemplars of good practice, let’s go to Bolton’. 

He has put a focus on “continuous improvement”, creating “performance panels” and a new quality assurance framework. Several courses have been placed on “notice to improve” – “not because they’re poor”, but because “quite good” is “not good enough”. 

He faced some kickback from staff to his restructuring reforms Down Under, but in Bolton, he says despite introducing “lots of change you would think would put pressure on people, they’re all up for it”.

Whereas Ofsted last year found “low morale”, a recent staff survey found 96 per cent of staff were proud to work there. Two recent pay awards have presumably boosted goodwill.

But Bolton still struggles to find construction, English and maths teachers, and quality in English and maths is “a challenge” for which it is “trying tactic after tactic”.

“At least we can demonstrate to Ofsted that we’re not sitting on our laurels,” says Sloan. “But you can’t tell us what the silver bullet is, so we’re just doing lots of trial and error.”

Tactics include creating an English and maths facility inside the college’s construction area to prevent “leakage” of students heading to the café instead of their next class, with each subject area having its own linked maths and English teachers who then become “more au fait with the subject area”.

Mock exams have been introduced for students not taking November resits, and an advanced practitioner is being recruited as a mentor for maths teachers.

Liam Sloan and his director of strategy and growth, Catherine Langstreth

Sex, drugs and rock’n’roll

Sloan advocated for the importance of English and maths in Australia and New Zealand, where the subjects were not treated as conditions of funding as they are here.

Likewise for tutorials in “sex, drugs, rock’n’roll and financial understanding”, but “bloody hell, did we need them”, he says.

Sloan says New Zealand’s collaborative networks of colleges and universities are “not perfect”, but an improvement on our own system’s “empire-building” and “fighting for money” through bidding processes. 

Sloan learned lessons in community involvement overseas which influenced how he drew together 1,100 stakeholders to create a “very much bottom-up” strategic plan for Bolton College, involving students past and present, employers, industry organisations, the DfE, Ofsted and governors.

As a result of their input, the college’s “cold and miserable” welcome area was brightened up, its wi-fi upgraded and seating areas provided for students to socialise between classes.

The college is also changing the operating hours of its outreach provision to meet the needs of parents and carers, and is looking to open for “twilight classes” to extend its teaching capacity.

Bolton College’s rejuvenated entranceway

Vocational value

Sloan was also influenced by how “brilliantly” 14-16 provision was done by colleges in Australia to “instil the value of vocational education as a real alternative to higher education”.

He is helping Bolton’s school heads to build a vocational ‘MBacc’ offer by opening up 14-16 provision at the college from September.

His belief in the value of 14-16 vocational education stems from how, after struggling with engagement at school, a work placement at a farm in Dumfries put him on a vocational journey which “transformed my life”. 

Sloan praises his mum for having “worked like a trojan” as a nurse, barmaid and laundry maid to give Sloan what he wanted as a child, which was “everything …I must have been a nightmare for her.”

One memory that stands out for him is waking up crying at night after finding himself alone in their flat as his mum was out working. He knocked for a neighbour, who put him back to bed. 

These days, he reflects how he is “ever so grateful” to his mum for how she supported him. She was the main reason he chose to return to UK shores.

True achievement

But for now, Sloan is looking ahead to the next Ofsted inspection, which will be his first in over a decade. In Australia, inspections could be undertaken remotely, with “very limited” lesson observations. Categories were limited to “satisfactory or not”, and much of the quality was measured on “learner voice”.

Bolton is now self-assessing “much stronger” than before, and Sloan is hopeful that Ofsted’s new toolkit will enable inspectors to better consider “the challenges of our local demographic”. Half his learners arrive without GCSE maths and English “so if we are actually hitting the national average, then bloody hell, have we done a great job”.

“I’m not sure that government authorities understand the complexity of what we’re dealing with,” he adds. 

Bolton’s attendance is up to 87 per cent from 82 per cent last year, against a 90 per cent target. For those who are “first in family” to come to college, Sloan argues that hitting 70 per cent attendance “is an achievement”.

The week before FE Week’s visit, Bolton gave out gold stars to 420 students who had managed 100 per cent attendance in their first term (compared to 120 last year), almost half being ESOL students who are “amazing in their determination to succeed”.

One learner, “beaming” as Sloan handed him his badge, had been excluded, but was brought back in following an appeal. 

This left Sloan “close to tears”. “I just thought ‘we’d written you off, and look at you now’.”

He only excludes learners as a last resort, but takes a “zero tolerance” attitude to bullying.

Ten students were recently suspended for a food fight, which left “a mess”. Cleaners were told it was their job to clean it up, which was “red rag to a bull” for Sloan. The college is investigating, and Sloan is hopeful those involved will return to classes. 

As he takes me for a tour and buys me a steak pasty from the college’s new ‘Grab and Go’ fast food café (more affordable for students than the Costa Coffee it replaced), we pass a group of rowdy young learners keen to pose for photos with their principal; he chides some of them for not wearing their lanyards. 

It turns out that his morning greetings have not gone unnoticed.

“Last year we barely saw the principal, this year every morning you’re downstairs, greeting everyone,” says one. “You give us motivation.”

Millions lost in fraud from Covid apprentice payments

Only a fifth of the £4.7 million in rogue Covid incentive payments given to employers to hire apprentices and trainees has been recovered.

An independent report by Covid counter-fraud commissioner Tom Hayhoe found the now-closed Education Skills Funding Agency (ESFA) had recouped £1 million of taxpayer money lost to fraud and error from its pandemic recovery schemes.

His report, which found a total of £10.8 billion of public money was lost to fraud, lambasted government departments’ unpreparedness for the crisis and “inadequate” measures to protect against criminality.

Hayhoe criticised some public bodies’ “inconsistent” approach to fraud risk assessments. Be he praised the Department for Education’s review of fraud dangers by “experienced” counter-fraud professionals.

Under the Conservative government, the DfE introduced employer cash incentives of £1,000 for each traineeship learner taken on in 2020, which could be claimed until the end of July 2022.

Then-chancellor Rishi Sunak concurrently unveiled a £2,000 bonus for employers who hired apprentices aged 16 to 24, and £1,500 for apprentices aged over 25 who were taken on for six months. The incentive for older apprentices was later doubled to £3,000.

The DfE spent £7.2 billion on Covid support, administered mostly by the ESFA, for emergency measures such as distributing laptops to vulnerable students, online classroom resources and employer incentives for traineeships and apprenticeships.

The department later conducted an assurance review of priority spending areas in the 2021-22 financial year.

Hayhoe’s report said the DfE found £9.7 million of detected fraud and error in total from its Covid spending, with £5.1 million recovered so far.

Alongside the ESFA’s £4.7 million lost to fraud and error for apprenticeship and trainee incentives, the report also detailed the recovery of £200,000 from “erroneous” payments made for exceptional costs to schools.

Hayhoe advised the DfE should continue to pursue bogus employer incentive payments, and said the department should use its extended legal powers to enforce recovery.

The public authorities (fraud, error and recovery) act received royal assent last week and creates new powers for government departments to tackle fraud, as well as adding an additional six years to the period during which actions against Covid-19 fraud can be taken.

“Where the pursuit of civil recovery has been unsuccessful, the department should consider utilising external enforcement resourcing given the extension of the statute of limitations granted by [the act],” Hayhoe recommended.

The DfE declined to comment.

ESOL addresses skills shortages; cutting it’s counterproductive

Around one in 50 people of working age in England have limited proficiency in English. This impacts on their ability to function in daily life, contribute to the economy and integrate into communities. 

As it is, ESOL provision and funding has decreased significantly over the last 15 years, while demand has risen. So, it is concerning to hear of councils which are considering reducing or removing funding for ESOL provision, which is key to upskilling those who speak English as a second language and creating benefits for the learner and contributions to the country’s economic growth.

Councils have legal duties under the Equalities Act and are required to undertake an equalities impact assessment. Therefore, cutting ESOL funding and access would be counterproductive. It could limit both the employment prospects of people with protected characteristics who don’t speak English as a first language, and affect community cohesion.

Meeting new English language requirements

Speaking English to a good standard is high on the government’s agenda, but an often-overlooked fact is that, of those people of working age who reported that they cannot speak English well or at all, 35 per cent have British nationality (2021 Census). 

In the recent post-16 education and skills white paper, we were reassured that the current adult ESOL​ offer​ would be reviewed to ensure it meets the needs of individuals to enable progression into employment or training. 

For this government’s aspiration to become a reality, there must be accountability about how money is spent locally. This is both the challenge and opportunity of devolution – an opportunity to be responsive to local employer needs, but equally with a possibility to frustrate central government ambitions.

Maintaining ESOL provision isn’t enough

Skills England has stated that the UK’s priority sectors will need 900,000 more workers by 2030. Upskilling is essential to realising this long-term growth.

If we are to address our skills shortage effectively, not only investing in, but rejuvenating our current ESOL offering can be the key to meeting skills gaps. However, it must be done in a way that is relevant for both learners and employers.

I am in agreement with those in the sector who have argued that positioning language development more firmly within the essential skills framework could, if managed well, strengthen pathways and progression.

Indeed, this wider debate overlooks the fact that current ESOL provision offers mainly just the lower level of learning. There is a need for quality English language provision that equips workers with the specific technical language required for skilled employment.

Having this in place could help realise the untapped potential of those skilled workers who come to the UK to fill skills gaps and contribute to the economy.

Much existing provision is not sufficient for equipping learners with the English language skills they need to access higher-level work or for further study, with 85 per cent of learners leaving ESOL provision with entry level 1-3 qualifications.

In the coming years, our biggest challenge will be ensuring that any investment in ESOL is implemented with the needs of these learners in mind.

A national vision for ESOL

English language learning helps people develop skills for our economy and participation in our communities. It is a vital stepping stone for individuals both new to the UK and for the third of the UK population who do not speak English well.

All this points towards the need for a national vision for ESOL. Any vision must be based on the principle of equitable access to high-quality, place-based ESOL across England.

Key ingredients to deliver this vision include clear and stable funding streams, regional coordination of provision, and qualification standards that meet language needs for life and work.

Ultimately, adults who have high English proficiency are more likely to be employed – and so prioritising ESOL offers a saving to the public purse by equipping everyone with the language skills to contribute.

Committee chair criticises DfE response to SEND report

The chair of Parliament’s education committee has criticised government for not directly addressing recommendations set out by its SEND report, calling on ministers to provide a “much more detailed response” in the new year.

The Department for Education has published a 14-page response to the education committee’s “solving the SEND crisis” report, which in September set out 95 recommendations for improving the system.

The report recommended ministers should create a ringfenced funding stream for special educational needs in FE. 

It also called on ministers to not remove statutory entitlements to education, health and care plans (EHCPs).

The government has also confirmed SEND tribunals will continue under its reforms, as new data published today showed a continued increase in the number of appeals against EHCP decisions.

Response ‘deliberately high level’

The DfE normally responds to each recommendation from the committee in full. Instead, the response published this week sets out only its principles of reform.

The government said its response “at this time is deliberately high-level and further detail on our plans for SEND reform will be set out in the schools white paper early in the new year following a further period of engagement with children and families”.

But committee chair Helen Hayes (pictured above) said while the committee “understands that the government isn’t in a position to answer our report’s recommendations in detail whilst it is still developing its SEND reforms”, the current response “will only suffice as an interim response”.

This is “because it does not directly address any of our report’s recommendations in the way that is expected of an official response to a select committee inquiry”.

“We expect the government to provide a much more detailed response to our recommendations early in the new year alongside the expected launch of the white paper.

“It is important that the extensive input from individuals and organisations, as well as the hard work committee, is respected and reflected in a detailed response from the government.”

Tribunals to remain

The government has also confirmed SEND tribunals – which rule on EHCP appeals – will continue, after new figures showed an 18 per cent increase in appeals in 2024-25 compared with the previous academic year.

There were 25,002 registered appeals last year, up from just 3,147 ten years ago. An age breakdown shows 7 per cent of appeals were for post-16 education.

Data published by the Ministry of Justice also shows that, as in previous years, the vast majority of cases – 99 per cent – that ended up at tribunal resulted in a finding in favour of parents. These are cases where the appellant wins the majority of the appeal. 

Last year, 14,009 appealed were decided on by judges. The decision was only upheld in 143 cases. 

Source Ministry of Justice

In its response to the committee, the DfE said it recognised “the need for clear, independent routes of redress, retaining the SEND tribunal as an important legal backstop for families who are unable to find resolution earlier in the process.

But it added that “all parties should work closely and collaboratively to develop solutions to their disagreements, so that children or young people get the support they need quicker without the need for a tribunal appeal”.

Schools minister Georgia Gould told an online consultation event this week the government was “really actively looking at” how to address needs without parents entering the “adversarial” tribunal process.

‘Barriers’ to resourced provision

Georgia Gould
Georgia Gould

Government is hosting nine face-to-face and five online events aimed at “putting families at the heart” of its plans.

But the “conversation” only runs until January 14 – and leaves little time ahead of the delayed white paper, expected to be published the same month.

Ministers have said they want to see more resourced provision for students with SEND.

Gould said government wanted to understand the “real barriers” to operating such provision.