Skip to content
23 August 2026

Latest news from FE Week

City College Norwich appoints 12-month interim CEO

City College Norwich has appointed its chief operating officer Jen Eves as interim CEO for the coming academic year.

Eves, who has been COO at the college since November 2024, is a former senior police officer and local government director.

Her appointment as interim boss from September 1 will follow the departure of current CEO Jerry White, who announced his decision to step down in June. White is moving to a role supporting the Association of Colleges with SEND reform.

The college said Eves will hold the interim CEO role for one academic year and during this time the board will make arrangements for the permanent position.

Details of Eves’ COO replacement appointment will come “in due course”.

The college said the new interim CEO was appointed following a “robust” recruitment and selection process that recognised her work on driving strategic ambitions and developing key support services.

City College Norwich’s chair Marcus Bailey said: “Jen has already demonstrated exceptional leadership during her time at the college and has made a significant contribution as COO.

“We are delighted that she has accepted this appointment and are confident that her expertise, strategic vision and commitment to our values will help guide City College Norwich through the coming year and beyond.”

Eves will take the reins of the three-campus college group that taught about 9,000 students in 2024-25 and retained its ‘good’ overall Ofsted grade in 2024.

The new interim CEO previously worked at the Suffolk Constabulary police force, with her social media profile suggesting that she spent one year as a chief superintendent before moving to West Suffolk Council in 2018.

At the council, she served as assistant director and then director of HR, legal and democratic services, before moving to City College Norwich in 2024.

White’s departure from the college was announced two months ago.

In the 2024-25 academic year he was paid a basic salary of £168,000, pension contributions of £48,000, and did not receive any bonus or benefits in kind.

He joined the college from Norfolk County Council’s adult education service in 2009 and replaced previous CEO Corrienne Peasgood in 2022.

Colleges given in-year growth funding ‘guarantee’ for 2026-27

Colleges have been given a “guarantee” that the government will meet the cost of in-year growth in 16 to 19 year old student numbers during the 2026-27 academic year.

The Department for Education said it was announcing the decision today, ahead of new enrolments this month, so colleges can “confidently recruit any young person they have a suitable place for” and help reduce the number of young people not in education, employment or training (NEET).

The commitment marks a change from the past two years, when the DfE funded only three-quarters of exceptional in-year growth demands after “unprecedented” increases in student numbers.

Usually, the department tells colleges that in-year growth funding is subject to affordability.

But guidance published today said the DfE is “prioritising funding for growth” in 2026-27 and will meet the cost of funding institutions according to its published methodology.

If the number of additional students, or the resulting growth payments, is higher than forecast, the department will “consider how to meet this pressure from other budgets”.

This could include changes to funding rates for 16 to 19 allocations in the 2027-28 academic year.

Education secretary Lucy Powell said she was determined to back government’s “warm words” on further education “with actions”.

“Results day was proof of the vital work colleges are doing, delivering lifechanging learning to hundreds of thousands of young people across the country,” she said.

“With record numbers receiving T Level results this year, it’s clear demand for high-quality technical education is growing fast.

“But for too long, colleges have only heard warm words from government. I am determined to back them with actions. This guarantee means colleges can offer places to every young person who wants one, driving down the number of young people not in education or training, and giving them the skills, experience and confidence to thrive.”

‘A step in the right direction’

In-year growth provides extra funding to colleges that recruit significantly more students than originally allocated, acting as an exception to lagged funding by offering a partial top-up for additional in-year costs.

Today’s guarantee does not mean colleges will receive full funding for every additional 16 to 19 year old student they enrol this year, as the DfE’s growth formula only provides funding for part of the additional costs.

The DfE aims to notify all colleges receiving growth funding by the end of April 2027, with payments beginning in May.

David Hughes, chief executive of the Association of Colleges, welcomed the move, as colleges expect at least 25,000 extra students to enrol this autumn.

“As a sector, we fight for this funding year after year. This year, it feels like we have been listened to, because the position for 2026-27 is that the DfE is guaranteeing to fully fund the formula they use on in-year student numbers above the lagged numbers,” he said.

“It means that colleges will be able to enrol every learner they can support this year ahead, helping thousands more young people to progress in learning that will help them, ultimately, to find work and reduce the risks of even higher NEET numbers.

“We are predicting at least 25,000 extra students to be enrolled in colleges this autumn and for many colleges, this could easily be hundreds of young people.”

But Hughes said today’s announcement “doesn’t go as far” as the association would like because the government “really should be guaranteeing the full funding of every learner, if it is serious about reducing the NEET numbers”.

“However, it is a step in the right direction and very welcome,” he added.

The funding guarantee comes as colleges face pressure on physical capacity. Leaders recently warned that some institutions will be forced to turn students away because they do not have enough space or staff to accommodate rising demand.

Portfolios confirmed for Lucy Powell’s DfE ministerial team

Portfolios have been confirmed for the reshuffled Department for Education ministers, weeks after Lucy Powell became education secretary.

New specific responsibilities including tackling antisemitism, oversight of special schools and the creation of free schools have been added to ministers’ duties.

Powell was appointed to replace Bridget Phillipson as education secretary on 20 July when Andy Burnham formed his new cabinet.

Early education minister Olivia Bailey was also replaced by journalist-turned-MP Paul Waugh.

The rest of the ministerial team remained largely unchanged with Georgia Gould, Josh MacAlister, and Jacqui Smith retaining their positions.

But their responsibilities have now been broadened or tweaked to reflect policy priorities.

Schools minister Gould’s purview has also broadened, from 18 policy areas to 21.

She will continue overseeing special education needs and disabilities (SEND), and will now also specifically oversee special schools, including independent special schools.

School productivity, the Teaching Regulation Agency (TRA), and the relationships and sex and health education (RSHE) review have also been added to her portfolio.

Gould will also now be responsible for student movement, as well as school admissions.

Meanwhile she will lose responsibility for faith schools and school transport, which will fall solely to early education minister Paul Waugh.

MacAlister to deputise for education secretary

Children and families minister Josh MacAlister, a Teach First alumnus and founder of social work charity Frontline, has seen his responsibilities rise from 17 responsibilities to 23.

One of the duties will be to deputise for the education secretary in emergencies. MacAlister continues to hold a couple of post-16 responsibilities.

Tackling antisemitism – into which government has commissioned an independent review – has been added to his brief, along with the creation of new free schools, out-of-school settings, and fostering and regional care cooperatives.

Waugh will be responsible for the same 22 areas his predecessor Bailey oversaw.

As well as early years education and the early years workforce, this includes a diverse range of other areas – including independent schools, illegal schools, faith schools, school uniform, mental health support in schools, intervention in failing schools, and the use of technology and AI in education.

NEET focus

Skills minister Jacqui Smith, who works across both the DfE and Department for Work and Pensions, will also remain responsible for the same areas as before.

However, support for young people aged 16 to 19 who are not in employment, education or training (NEET) – formerly listed as part of “careers advice” – has been made a standalone responsibility.

This reflects the government’s heightened focus on tackling rising NEET figures.

Wording has also been updated to make clear Smith is responsible for vocational qualifications including those “level 3 and below”, meaning she will oversee Burnham’s new pathways for 14 to 16-year-olds.

Meanwhile, the education secretary’s responsibilities remain unchanged from when Phillipson was in the role.

Here’s the full list of each minister’s responsibilities, with new briefs highlighted in bold…

Lucy Powell, education secretary

  • early years and childcare
  • children’s social care
  • teacher quality, recruitment and retention
  • the school curriculum
  • school improvement
  • academies and free schools
  • further education
  • apprenticeships and skills
  • higher education

Georgia Gould, school standards minister

  • school improvement, intervention and inspection (including links with Ofsted)
  • regional improvement for standards and excellence (RISE)
  • special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) and high needs
  • alternative provision
  • special schools (including independent special schools (ISS))
  • initial teacher training and incentives
  • teacher retention including the early career framework and teacher training entitlement
  • Teaching Regulation Agency (TRA)
  • school leadership
  • school governance
  • teacher pay and pensions
  • school support staff
  • core school funding
  • pupil premium
  • school productivity
  • qualifications (including links with Ofqual)
  • national curriculum
  • access to sport, arts and music in education, working with other departments
  • admissions and pupil movement

Josh MacAlister, children’s minister

  • children’s social care
  • children in care and children in need
  • looked-after children
  • child protection
  • adoption
  • kinship care and family justice
  • fostering and regional care cooperatives
  • care leavers
  • children’s social care workforce
  • unaccompanied asylum-seeking children
  • single unique identifier for children and use of children’s social care data
  • child protection, safeguarding and serious incidents
  • local authority intervention and improvement
  • family support including the families first programme
  • tackling antisemitism
  • prevention of serious violence in schools and post-16 settings
  • counter extremism in schools and post-16 settings
  • out-of-school settings
  • school safeguarding and guidance on keeping children safe in education
  • creation of new free schools
  • maintenance and improvement of the education estate
  • environmental sustainability in the education sectors
  • deputising for the Secretary of State for Education in emergencies

Paul Waugh, early education minister

  • early years education including for children with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND)
  • childcare and the home learning environment
  • early years workforce
  • early communication skills and early intervention
  • Best Start Family Hubs and parenting
  • breakfast clubs
  • school food, including free school meals
  • holiday activities and food (HAF) programme
  • school attendance, including register of children who are not in school
  • reception admissions
  • changes to existing schools
  • home-to-school transport
  • mental health support in schools
  • behaviour, preventing bullying and exclusions in schools
  • school uniform
  • young carers
  • independent schools
  • illegal schools
  • faith schools
  • intervention in failing schools and school improvement
  • use of data, digital technology and artificial intelligence (AI) in education
  • use of research, science and evidence at DfE

Jacqui Smith, skills minister

  • governance, intervention and accountability of further education colleges
  • funding for education and training, provision and outcomes for 16- to 19-year-olds
  • further education financial stability and workforce
  • access to higher education, participation and lifelong learning entitlement
  • quality of higher education and the student experience (including the Office for Students)
  • student finance (including the Student Loans Company)
  • technical and vocational qualifications (level 3 and below), including T Levels
  • higher technical education (levels 4 and 5)
  • careers advice
  • support for young people aged 16 to 19 not in employment, education or training (NEET)
  • skills strategy and delivery
  • technical excellence colleges
  • international education

Smith’s DWP responsibilities remain unchanged. They are:

  • Skills England and Industry Training Boards
  • adult education, including basic skills
  • apprenticeships, including the growth and skills levy
  • skills bootcamps
  • sector skills packages
  • careers advice and support for young people over the age of 19 not in employment, education or training (NEET)
  • Youth Guarantee

AI to vet apprenticeship vacancies for discrimination

The Department for Education is developing an artificial intelligence system to vet apprenticeship vacancies for discrimination and decide whether they need to be reviewed by a human before they are published.

The proposed “recruit an apprentice AI vacancy quality assurance API” will use a large language model to assess vacancies for potential breaches of the Equality Act 2010, alongside checks for spelling and grammar, missing information, inconsistent training associated to the apprenticeship, geographic issues and duplicate adverts.

It is intended to reduce the number of vacancies requiring manual checks, with the DfE projecting a 40 per cent saving in manual review costs.

A notice published by the Cabinet Office, Department for Science, Innovation and Technology and Government Digital Service said the system will use GPT-4o via Microsoft’s Azure Enterprise OpenAI service to assess apprenticeship vacancy text.

About 40,000 apprenticeship vacancies are uploaded to the government’s Find an Apprenticeship service each year, with each undergoing a manual review that can take up to 24 hours.

The new system is expected to process between 5,000 and 6,000 draft vacancies a month.

The DfE did not respond to FE Week enquiries about the timeline for launch, how much manual checks currently cost or whether the AI system would reduce staffing.

Stephen Evans, the chief executive of the Learning and Work Institute, said that AI could help to increase the efficiency of checks given the volume of vacancies. The current system was “unlikely to be perfect in any case as people can make mistakes just as AI can”.

However, he added that use of AI “must not come at the cost of accuracy so it’s important to test the system thoroughly before rollout and review and update it thereafter”.

AI to screen for discrimination

The government’s notice said the apprenticeship vacancy model has one specific discrimination check, alongside a check for missing or inconsistent content and nine spelling checks.

AI assigns each vacancy a red, amber or green rating.

All red vacancies – those deemed high risk – will be sent for full human review.

Half of amber vacancies will be reviewed, while only 1 per cent of green vacancies will be randomly sampled.

Vacancies that receive a green rating and are not selected for sampling will proceed automatically to the Find an Apprenticeship service without a further human check.

The DfE said this approach would allow reviewers to concentrate on “higher-risk or ambiguous vacancies”.

Phoebe Moore, professor of management and the futures of work at the University of Essex, said using AI to identify discrimination was an “interesting and potentially progressive innovation”, but that allowing AI to decide which adverts did not need human checks raised questions about whether it could reliably spot discriminatory language.

“Usually AI is critiqued for having discriminatory properties, so I think it’s interesting to flip that on its head and say we’re going to use it to identify discrimination,” she told FE Week.

“But I would question how the system will be trained to spot discrimination. Usually, patterns are what help an algorithm identify something, so what training data is going to be used and how will it deal with vacancies that don’t already fit those patterns?

“You can’t necessarily use a blanket category to identify discrimination because of the specific requirements of each vacancy. You need to understand why a company is asking for particular criteria.

“I think the function will draw attention to the potential for discrimination, rather than automatically pronounce that a vacancy is discriminatory or not. I wouldn’t say the Equality Act allows you to simply make a list of prohibited words, as you might in content moderation. It’s a tricky one.”

The department tested the AI checks against two and a half months of manually reviewed vacancy assessments.

For discrimination specifically, it recorded a 100 per cent true positive rate and a 0 per cent false negative rate for discrimination in that historical testing – meaning it identified all cases spotted by human reviewers.

However, the model also produced a 16 per cent false positive rate, meaning it flagged some vacancies as potentially discriminatory when human reviewers had not identified an issue.

The DfE said false negatives were of greater concern because they could result in a problematic vacancy being published, while false positives mainly created additional work for human reviewers.

Human in the loop

Officials have classified false negatives and hallucinations as moderate risks.

The department said its model could hallucinate – producing a factually incorrect classification or recommendation – but a “human in the loop” would minimise the impact.

It also acknowledged that identifying fraudulent or malicious vacancies was “inherently challenging” because of the “subjective nature of judgment” and might require information outside the vacancy itself, such as financial or Companies House checks. It described this risk as unavoidable.

A spokesperson for the Equality and Human Rights Commission said: “Under the Equality Act 2010, all public bodies – including the Department for Education – must make sure their policies promote equal opportunities, good relations and don’t lead to unlawful discrimination.

“While artificial intelligence can help transform public services for the better, improving delivery and reducing costs, public bodies must take steps to prevent AI from perpetuating bias and discrimination.”

‘AI is not infallible’

AI is increasingly being adopted across various government departments, according to a House of Commons Library report.

The DfE is experimenting with another AI tool to assist teachers by pooling government documents such as curriculum guidance and lesson plans, and the department could soon use artificial intelligence to draft responses to as much as 80 per cent of its external correspondence.

Evans said: “Ultimately AI is not infallible, only as good as its design, and will need ongoing updating based on expert human input. Both the department and users of the service must have the chance to feed back and the government should take action if AI is missing things or getting things wrong.”

Chichester CEO missing in action for eight months

Chichester College Group is keeping tight-lipped over the long-term absence of its chief executive, who remains away from his post as the new academic year begins.

Andrew Green, who has held the top job since 2021, has not been working at the group since December last year.

The college has refused to explain the reasons for his eight-month absence or say when or if he will return.

Green has remained active online, promoting an executive leadership coaching business he co-founded and attending events for Culture Shift CIO, a charity that he chairs.

But he remains missing from the college as the 2026-27 academic year gets underway.

A college spokesperson told FE Week it had a policy not to comment on individual matters, including for the accountable officer of the organisation.

“As an employer, we owe all employees a duty of privacy regarding any leave of absence,” they said.

The spokesperson confirmed that the group’s deputy chief executive, Vicki Illingworth, continues to undertake the statutory duties of the chief executive and accounting officer.

“Appropriate arrangements remain in place to ensure that the group continues to operate effectively and deliver high-quality services to the communities it serves,” they added.

Mysteriously absent

Chichester College Group teaches close to 23,000 students and employs 2,400 staff across nine campuses. It received £126 million last year, £97 million of which from public funding body grants, according to its 2025 accounts.

Green took over from Shelagh Legrave in 2021, when she left to become FE Commissioner.

He first joined Chichester College in 2010 as deputy principal, and became executive principal at the institution in 2017 following a merger with Crawley College (formerly Central Sussex College).

Green also served as interim chief executive of Greater Brighton Metropolitan College in 2020, before it merged with Chichester College Group in 2022.

The group’s latest accounts show that Green was paid a basic salary of £180,000 in 2025, with £4,000 in benefits in kind and £52,000 in pension contribution.

Green has been missing from the college since December 3, when Illingworth became interim accounting officer and began to lead governing board meetings on his behalf.

Illingworth explained in an all-staff email on December 10 that Green had taken a “leave of absence” and she would cover his duties until further notice.

A source close to the college said staff have not been told the reasons for Green’s absence.

Another senior leader at the group, chief commercial officer Dan Power, also took a period of leave this year before mutually agreeing with the college to stand down at the end of June.

The Department for Education and FE Commissioner’s office declined to comment.

Green also declined to comment.

VTQ and T Level results 2026: 8 key trends

T Level and other vocational and technical qualification (VTQ) results are out today – here’s your FE Week rundown of key findings…

VTQ high achievers grow again

Ofqual data shows that of the 221,000 VTQ results issued in England, about 88 per cent were applied general qualifications such as BTECs, and the rest were tech levels.

The data, covering March to August, remains provisional and will be updated to show the whole of the academic year in the autumn.

The wide range of qualification types and grading systems limit VTQ results data, but it shows business, administration and law remains the most popular subject for the fourth year in a row.

The most common VTQ grade format was P, M, D, D*, with 114,795 grades issued. This year, 13 per cent of those results were D*, the highest grade available.

This percentage has gradually increased from 10.8 per cent in 2024 but is lower than the 15.6 per cent awarded in 2022.

There was significant growth in health, public services and care, and digital technology since last year, with D* grades rising 4.5 percentage points to 16.9 per cent and 4.8 percentage points to 17.2 per cent respectively.

T Level results grow 65 per cent

The number of students receiving T Level results shot up from 11,909 in 2025 to 19,665 in 2026 – a 65 per cent rise.

This was, however, to be expected as the technical qualifications have been on a steady rollout since 2020, with more subjects coming on board each year.

Results were announced in 21 separate pathways today, three for the first time – animal care and management; craft and design; and media, broadcast and production.

Education and early years was the most popular with 3,780 results, a 51 per cent increase from last year.

The other most popular were health, management and administration, and digital production, design and development.

There was a 61 per cent increase in health to 2,967 results, management and administration rose 40 per cent to 1,857 and design, surveying and planning grew 53.4 per cent to 1,027.

Two of the new T Levels – media, broadcast and production and animal care and management – had sizeable cohorts of 1,059 and 448 respectively. Craft and design had only 67 results in its first year.

Uptick in top grades (but don’t overinterpret it)

The proportion of distinction and distinction* T Level grades rose to 18.1 per cent, up from 15.7 per cent last year and 15.9 per cent in 2024.

This year’s overall pass rate was 92.6 per cent.

Ofqual chief regulator Sir Ian Bauckham told FE Week the rise in top grades indicated that teachers were “now more familiar with the course and are teaching it more fluently and confidently” and that students with “stronger starting points are trusting T Levels and opting for them and doing well at them”.

However, he urged for caution when comparing grades to previous years as T Levels were still in an early rollout period with relatively small numbers taking them and new pathways coming on board.

By comparison, 906,000 students received A Level results today.

Positive pathway progression

T Level pathways with the highest pass results were craft and design, health, education and early years, management and administration, and design, surveying and planning, which each had rates of more than 95 per cent.

Most of these had large cohorts of between 3,780 and 1,588.

Pathways with cohorts of more than 500 that had the highest distinction and distinction* rates included education and early years at 33 per cent, accounting at 27 per cent, and animal care and management at 23 per cent.

Only six of the 21 pathways received any distinction* grades, with 62 of the 74 highest grades coming from education and early years. Last year, only 21 distinction* grades were awarded from a cohort of 11,981.

Onsite construction, which is being phased out and had only 213 results this year, had the lowest pass rate of 75 per cent.

Other T Levels with lower pass rates included design and development for engineering and manufacturing, at 81 per cent of 1,649 students. This was the same as last year.

Building services engineering also had an 81 per cent of 830 students, a slight decline on its 84 per cent pass rate last year.

Largest T Level growth in the north east

T Level results grew by at least 49 per cent in every region in England, with the north east and east of England seeing the largest increases of 89 per cent and 78 per cent.

The north west and south east, which both had the largest cohorts, had the lowest growth rates of 49 per cent and 53 per cent.

The east Midlands had the smallest cohort but saw a 69 per cent growth in results, up to 1,249.

Gender balance challenge

T Levels have an equal gender balance overall, with 9,699 females and 9,878 males picking up a result today.

But there are big differences subject to subject.

Similar to last year, the 2026 data shows education and early years and health pathways had the highest proportion of female results, at 96 and 91 per cent. These two pathways accounted for 65 per cent of all female T Level results.

Meanwhile, males made up 97.5 per cent of the building services engineering pathway, 94.4 per cent of the onsite construction pathway and 92.2 per cent of digital support services.

Bauckham said these imbalances should be addressed.

“What most people would want to aim for is in most professions a good, healthy gender balance, and I think where we see the gender balance tilting one way or the other markedly, we probably want to pause and say, ‘hang on a minute, is that quite right?’,” he told FE Week.

“There may be some professions where we don’t have that as an aspiration but overall I think we want men and women to be well represented in most professional areas.”

‘Disappointing’ placements results for hundreds

Today’s provisional data showed 552 students did not complete their industry placements, making up 2.8 per cent of the cohort, a 0.7 percentage point increase since last year.

Of this total, 374 students passed the other two required elements of the T Level qualification, the core and occupational specialism.

Bauckham said the industry placement failures were “disappointing and life altering” for affected students.

The education sector needed to “dig into” the problem and address it “wherever possible”.

The DfE’s data shows pathways with larger cohorts that had the highest non-completion rates for industry placements were digital support services, building services engineering, and design and development for engineering and manufacturing – all at about 5 per cent.

Pathways with the highest completion percentages included education and early years, health, and management and administration, all at less than 2 per cent.

Retention rate improves

Figures show that 25,508 started a T Level in 2024-25; 19,665 students received results today, which suggests 77 per cent were retained and assessed.

Last year’s retention rate was 73 per cent, while the year before was 71 per cent, and 66 per cent the year before that.

In comparison, in 2023-24 16-year-olds taking large VTQs had a retention rate of 80 per cent, while the rate was 90 per cent for those taking three A Levels.

A Level results 2026: 6 key trends in this year’s data

A Level results are out this morning – here’s your handy FE Week round up of the key trends.

All findings are for students in England, unless stated. Here’s what we know…

1. Top grades rise again

The proportion of A and A* grades awarded this year has increased slightly, from 28.2 per cent in 2025 to 28.3 per cent this year. This represents a rise of 0.35 per cent.

This figure stood at 25.2 per cent in 2019, before the Covid-19 pandemic. This means the gap between top grades pre- and post-covid has expanded again.

The proportion of results at grade C and above also rose by 0.51 per cent since last year, up to 78.1 per cent.

Last year the figure was 77.7 per cent, and in pre-pandemic 2019 this was 75.5 per cent.

2. Increase in A* grades

The proportion of A* grades achieved by A Level students in England has risen by 2.1 per cent in a year. The overall figure stands at 9.6 per cent, up from 9.4 per cent last year.

This is still far down from the figures seen during the pandemic, which peaked at 19.1 per cent in 2021.

In 2019 the proportion of A* grades stood at 7.7 per cent.

3. Regional attainment gap widens again

The gap between the highest and lowest-performing regions has widened again this year.

At A and above, there is now a 9.6 percentage point gap, compared to 7.3 per cent in pre-pandemic 2019.

This year, the north east and East Midlands ranked lowest. The proportion of top A Level grades in both regions was 23.1 per cent.

This compares to 32.7 per cent in London and 31.5 per cent in the south east. Both of these areas also saw the largest rises of 0.6 and 0.3 percentage points respectively.

Yorkshire and the Humber also saw a 0.3 percentage point rise, to 25.6 per cent.

4. Gap between boys and girls’ attainment widens

Boys overtook girls in the proportion of top grades (A and above) last year, for the first time since 2019.

The trend continued this year, with 28.9 per cent of grades issued to boys at A and above, compared to 27.9 per cent for girls.

This means the gap between boys’ and girls’ attainment has widened, from 0.4 percentage points last year to 1 this year.

A* grades made up 10.1 per cent of those issued to boys, compared to 9.1 per cent for girls.

5. Spike in economics entries

Economics is now one of the five most popular A Level subjects, with 43,121 entries. It jumped from tenth most popular in 2025 to fifth this year.

Ofqual’s data for England shows around 70 per cent of entries were from boys.

While economics has seen a large jump in entries, the rest of the top five remains the same. Maths again had the highest number of entries this year, at 95,044, followed by psychology (95,044), biology (60,978) and chemistry (53,605).

Economics replaces business studies, which saw a rise in uptake last year, and is now the seventh most popular subject, at 40,485 entries.

Politics and law have also become more popular, with rises of 11.9 and 10.5 per cent respectively.

English Literature saw the largest drop in entries, with 11 per cent fewer than last year.

6. Private and grammar schools top the tables

Ofqual data breaking results down by school type show that as usual, students in private and grammar schools outperform those in other settings.

Almost 49 per cent of grades issued to private school students were an A or above, compared to around 43 per cent for grammar schools.

FE colleges achieved the lowest proportion of top grades with 13 per cent of A or above grades issued to college learners.

The proportion of top grades was 27 per cent at free schools, 25.6 per cent for sixth form colleges, 23.5 per cent for academies, 23 per cent for council-maintained schools and 22 per cent for secondary moderns.

General FE colleges have ranked bottom for A Level achievement since 2019, according to Ofqual centre data from 2019 onwards.

A Level results 2026: 2.1% rise in A* grades

The proportion of A* grades achieved by A Level students in England has risen by 2.1 per cent in a year, with regional and gender gaps widening.

This year 9.6 per cent of grades were A*, up from 9.4 per cent in 2025, data published by the Joint Council for Qualifications (JCQ) shows.

Overall, the proportion of top grades also rose. This year 28.3 per cent of grades were an A or A*, up from 28.2 per cent last year.

These figures have been climbing since 2023, when grading was adjusted to bring results nearer to pre-pandemic norms.

Sir Ian Bauckham, the chief regulator at Ofqual, said the qualifications “open doors” for students because they were so widely recognised and trusted.

“A Levels are trusted because they are awarded to rigorous and consistent national standards. Universities, employers, and students can have confidence that an A Level grade represents what students know and can do.”

Read our handy round up of the key trends.

Gaps grow

A number of gaps have widened. The gender gap in top grades now favours boys, who outperformed girls last year for the first time since the pandemic.

However, girls make up 54 per cent of A Level entries, so the overall number of top grades issued to girls is still higher.

The gap between the best and worst-performing regions has also widened to 9.6 percentage points.

London continues to have the best results, with 32.7 per cent of grades at an A or above, up 0.6 percentage points.

The East Midlands now shares the bottom spot with the north east, following a 0.7 percentage point drop in top grades to 23.1 per cent. There was also a slight fall in top grades in the east of England and north west, bucking the national trend.

‘Significant disparities’

Pepe Di’Iasio, the general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, noted that while the year-on-year results were largely consistent, “this also means that very significant disparities continue to exist between the English regions in terms of top grades.

“These results are clearly affected by relative levels of socioeconomic disadvantage and reflect the structural inequalities that exist in our nation.

“Every year we say that we cannot go on like this and that as a society we must do more to support communities that often feel abandoned and neglected. When will we actually do that?”

He said the results were a “culmination of a great deal of hard work, and everybody involved deserves enormous credit for their commitment.

“It is important to remember that today is not only about celebrating A Levels, but that many thousands of young people take a range of equivalent qualifications in technical and vocational subjects that are vital both to their progression and to providing the skills base of the nation.”

Will we see an ‘Odyssey effect’?

As revealed earlier this year, there have been big rises in the number of entries to politics, law, economics and further maths. Entries dropped in English literature, drama and classical subjects.

Myles McGinley
Myles McGinley

Myles McGinley, the managing director of exam board Cambridge OCR, noted that economics was “surging in popularity”.

“The students getting their A Level results today were born around 2008: they are children of the financial crisis and many have been gripped by the more recent economic events that shape their world.”

Classics entries were down “but we expect that to change” following the release of Christopher Nolan’s film adaptation of Homer’s epic The Odyssey.

“We’re already hearing from teachers and students about ‘The Odyssey effect’. This year has shown the classics can be interesting to everyone.”

Drop in first-choice uni place success

Data from the Universities and Colleges Admissions Service (UCAS) shows that as of this morning, 78.3 per cent of England’s 18-year-olds have got a place at their first-choice university, down slightly from 81.5 per cent last year.

The proportion getting a place at one of their back-up choices rose from 11.6 to 13.6 per cent.

UCAS chief executive Jo Saxton, a former Ofqual chief regulator, said that today’s school leavers “were just starting secondary school when the pandemic interrupted their education.

“Given the significant disruption they faced at such a formative stage of their learning, it is wonderful to see so many young people getting a place at university or college. I’m delighted to see them backing themselves and choosing to invest in their education.”

 

This story has been updated. It previously incorrectly reported that the proportion of A* grades had risen by 3.2 per cent. 

T Level results 2026: Top grades rise

The proportion of top T Level grades achieved by students has risen to 18.1 per cent this year – and the drop out rate is continuing to fall.

Of the 19,665 learners picking up results today for the two-year technical qualifications, 3,565 received distinction or distinction*.

This is a 2.4 percentage point rise on the previous year when 15.7 per cent – 1,872 of 11,909 total students – achieved the feat.

Starts data from the Department for Education shows that 25,508 young people started a T Level in 2024-25. As 19,665 students received T Level results today, it suggests 23 per cent left the course early.

The drop out rate sat at 27 per cent in 2025, 29 per cent in 2024 and 34 per cent in 2023.

The dropout rate for those who took three A Levels last year was 10 per cent, and for large vocational and technical qualifications the rate was 20 per cent.

Be wary of comparisons

In an Ofqual press briefing, Phil Le Feuvre, chief operating officer of T Level awarding body NCFE, said it was “really positive” to see students achieving the top grades as these are “challenging qualifications”.

However, he warned that caution should be taken when comparing previous results.

“There can be limited value in comparing directly year-on-year results because the number of subjects and students are increasing as those T Levels are rolled out,” he told FE Week.

“Variances in cohort sizes and in the subjects mean that those comparisons between years can be misleading.”

T Levels were introduced in 2020 as the government’s new “gold standard” qualifications that are meant to be the technical equivalent of A Levels.

A T Level has three parts – a core component involving an exam and employer set project, an occupational specialism where practical skills are tested and a minimum 315-hour, or 45-day, industry placement – and students must achieve all three to pass the overall qualification.

This is the fifth year T Levels have been awarded. Results data now covers 21 individual T Levels, three of which have been awarded for the first time – animal care and management; craft and design; and media, broadcast and production.

The number of students completing T Levels this summer increased by 65 per cent, from 11,909 in in 2025 to 19,665 in 2026, while the number of schools and colleges offering T Levels rose from 255 in 2025 to 307 in 2026 (a 20 per cent rise).

This year’s overall pass rate hit 92.6 per cent, up from 91.4 per cent reported on results day 2025. However, the Joint Council for Qualifications said the 2025 results have now been revised as part of “standard statistical updates” to include late completion of industry placements, and outcomes of remarking/moderation. The pass rate for this cohort is now 93.5 per cent.

The proportion of students achieving a pass this year was 23.7 per cent compared to 26.1 per cent last year, while merits were handed out to 50.8 per cent compared to 49.6 per cent.

Distinctions were received by 17.8 per cent of this year’s cohort compared to 15.6 per cent last year, and distinction* was handed out to 0.4 per cent this year compared to 0.2 per cent last year.

And 7.2 per cent of students received a “partial achievement” this year – which is where a learner attempts all elements of the T Level but does not achieve them all – down from 8.3 per cent in 2025.

The Joint Council for Qualifications only releases partial T Level data to journalists before 9.30am on results day, unlike A Levels which benefit from a full analysis.

The Department for Education will publish full T Level data later this morning, which includes breakdown by gender, region and other granular data including industry placement completions.

A VTQ ‘first’ for JCQ

Around a third of young people receiving results today would have completed other vocational and technical qualifications including BTECs and Cambridge Technicals.

Margaret Farragher, JCQ’s chief executive, said today marks a “milestone” as it is the first time the council has published data for 300,000 results from across 421 VTQs by JCQ’s awarding organisations alongside results for AS and A Levels.

It comes as the government prepares to replace VTQs with V Levels, which are being introduced from 2027.

Farragher said she hopes that by introducing VTQ results to its data release this year that it brings “better transparency of the full range of qualifications schools and colleges offer to support students progress into work, apprenticeships or higher and further education”.

JCQ’s VTQ data covers the whole of the UK. The number of top grades was 28,390 out of 271,615, about 10.5 per cent of the total.

The most popular subject areas were business, administration and law, with 53,756 grades issued, followed by leisure, travel and tourism, which had 47,273 grades issued, the council said.

Ofqual chief regulator Sir Ian Bauckham said VTQs are “equally important” to A Levels.

“They help students develop the knowledge and skills needed for apprenticeships, employment, and further study,” he added.

“When an employer or university sees these qualifications, they can be confident they demonstrate students’ genuine achievement.”