Colin Booth, chief executive, Luminate Education Group

Colin Booth’s 40-year career has taken him from teaching anything anybody would pay him for, whilst living homeless in his Ford Cortina, to becoming chief executive of one of the largest college groups and a national leader of further education.

But recent months have been the toughest of all with his Luminate Education Group facing investigation following multiple complaints from the same person – complaints that Booth fiercely denies as “vexatious”.

Following internal and external investigations and a complete relationship breakdown last year between the leaders of Luminate and White Rose, its four-school academy trust, Luminate relinquished its direct management of the trust. It will sever its ties completely when White Rose joins another MAT.

Recent investigations by external bodies that include Ofsted, Leeds City Council and the Education and Skills Funding Agency (ESFA) have taken their toll.

He is immensely proud of the college group’s 14 to 16 provision, and how it nurtures pupils who he feels were failed by the school system.

An unannounced Ofsted inspection in May, following another safeguarding complaint, was also full of praise for the Leeds facility.

But Booth describes the ongoing fallout from previous investigations as “depressing, and very stressful”.

He also blames himself in part for the relationship breakdown with White Rose’s chief executive Andrew Whittaker. “I have to mark that down as a big failure in my management of that person.”

Colin Booth, Luminate chief executive

Living in his car

Booth’s interest in teaching teenagers followed his graduation from the University of East Anglia, when he worked with young people on environmental issues at Capel Manor College in North London.

He spent the next two years getting part-time teaching jobs in London, paid by the hour.

While nowadays colleges are “desperate to get half a dozen people applying“ for lecturer positions, it was “quite difficult” to get a job then, with 200-300 applicants for each position.

Booth was “a bit short of money to say the least” and spent that first year living in his Ford Cortina and “sleeping on people’s floors and sofas”.

Red box teaching

Booth tells me his dream job would have been as a rugby union player. But failing that I’m sure he would love to be in control of the chancellor’s red box, so he could allocate colleges a massive injection of cash.

When he started out, he commanded a very different red box – one that still sits in the corner of his office. He used to go into colleges and stick that day’s timetable on the box, with all the gaps marked. Managers added their sticky notes on to it with a time and class for anything they wanted covering.

The box contained standard lessons that Booth adapted for “almost anything”, something that he believes made him a better teacher, by forcing him to reflect on the techniques of the craft.

He admits it was “extremely poor management practice” and “sincerely hopes” a teacher would not be able to do that today.

Sex education

Booth started noticing “patterns” emerging in his classes. He was most often asked to cover sex education and says it’s “not that surprising” that teachers tended to be off on those days.

He recalls awkward groups of young mechanics, bricklayers and nursery workers, the “most difficult” being twenty-something roofers.

He doubts whether students’ knowledge of such matters now is “that great” – the government’s women and equalities committee this week called for sex ed to be made compulsory in post-16 education settings for that reason. But in the mid-Eighties, “it was awful”.

Colin Booth, Luminate chief executive

Championing the underdog

The thread running through Booth’s career is his championing of marginalised groups. At the moment, that’s vulnerable 14 to 16-year-olds, but in his early career it was students with learning difficulties.

His first full-time role, at Carshalton College in Surrey involved teaching, then establishing, courses for these learners.

At the time, the college was “desperate” for more enrolments as it was enrolling “fewer and fewer” GCSE and A-level students.  Booth was told to recruit as many learners as he could, so ventured into schools.

The Warnock Report in 1981 introduced FE’s first SEND system and Booth recalls being warmly welcomed by schools that had never been approached by college lecturers to recruit pupils with emotional and behavioural difficulties.

He “caused mayhem” with his own success. He got 30 learners lined up, but his senior lecturer “went mad”, because she didn’t have enough teachers.

College independence

In the early days of Booth’s career, colleges were reliant on local authorities for funding. But there was “a lot more” of it than now.

He recalls how the college’s French teacher had just two A Level and one GCSE student a week.

The fact that there were so few French students was “a problem”, but “not the end of the world. The thinking was, ‘we’ll only stop teaching it when the local authority don’t give us the money to’.”

Booth became a senior lecturer at South Thames College when colleges were made independent – a status they recently lost with reclassification.

At the time the college was moving its staff data from paper to computer hard drives and Booth was tasked with “making sense” of it.

What that revealed was “fascinating”. For three years, a head of department had been “Tipp-Exing off” his staff rota a member of faculty he didn’t like and sending him home.

“Nobody noticed…it wasn’t until we sat with all the electronic data and said ‘who’s that? And why are they getting paid that money? Let’s find a timetable for them’.”

Inspector Booth

Booth spent nine years at South Thames before becoming vice-principal at Newcastle College and a part-time Ofsted inspector, at first focused on adult learning.

At the same time, he stopped teaching  – which he says was unfortunate as he learnt from the role “how to teach better than ever before”.

“The number of people I saw doing things in classrooms and I thought ‘I would’ve copied that if I’d seen it 10 years ago. The opposite too.”

Booth is broadly supportive of inspection, despite the pressure it piles on. He recalls how before the introduction of the common inspection framework in 1992, “all teachers in a staffroom knew who the best and worst ones were. We also knew nobody ever did anything about it…which was terrible, really.”

In the early days, Ofsted’s role was providing advice rather than public judgments. But “quite frequently people didn’t follow it”. Booth was one of the first cohorts to get training in making clear judgments, which he found “incredibly difficult” at first.

But those changes mean teaching is “a lot better now”.

Booth moved on to Barnsley College for seven years (steering it to outstanding) before joining Leeds City College group in 2015, rebranding it to Luminate three years later.

Free schools opposition

One of the threats Luminate is facing is the prospect of seven new colleges and sixth forms in West Yorkshire.

Leeds City College is one of five colleges that have written to the DfE to oppose the proposals.

Some of the money to build them will come from the levelling-up fund, but Booth believes it represents “the opposite of levelling-up”. It is intended, he says, for “relatively elitist level 3 provision”.

“We’ve got the government providing a fund to set up more competition for the thing that’s already there, while underfunding everything else. It’s dysfunctional.”

With more NEETS in Leeds than ever, the area needs “loads more level 1 and vocational” courses. “The only thing we don’t need more of is A Level provision.

“If you cream off everything that’s easy to do, what you get left with is the most vulnerable and difficult students – the people who need colleges most. You can’t possibly run it.”

Booth laments that politically, there is a “complete vacuum” when it comes to educational structures. There’s also a mismatch between the needs of the local economy for more level 2 and 3 digital skills provision, and Luminate’s waiting lists for basic skills courses.

But Luminate is set to become one of the biggest T Level providers in the country in September, and Booth is a great believer in the qualification – for some learners. “The idea they can completely replace everything that isn’t A Levels is utter nonsense”.

Leeds City College

FE leadership programme

Booth works with the FE Commissioner, with nine other leaders, on its national leaders programme, providing advice to other colleges.

He’s been supporting Kirklees College around senior management restructuring, while Stoke College was having “real difficulties with their apprenticeships”, so Booth brought them in to talk to one of Luminate’s apprenticeship managers.

And how about his own leadership style?

The priority for him is ensuring staff are excited to work for Luminate. “I spend all my time worrying about how to create the right values and culture. Because if staff enjoy being here, they’ll do a better job.”

MOVERS & SHAKERS: EDITION 432

Sarah Marquez

Dean of Higher Education, University Centre Leeds, Luminate Education Group

Start date: July 2023

Previous job: Interim Dean of Higher Education, Luminate Education Group

Interesting fact: Sarah is an avid traveller and when she’s not busy overseeing the university centre, she can be found exploring the Greek islands. She’s particularly fond of the people, culture, food, beautiful scenery and the climate


Billy Smith

Chief Executive, Association for Learning Technology

Start date: September 2023

Previous job: Freelance consultant

Interesting fact: Billy was a child actor and filmed alongside well-known actors such as Keira Knightley, Ross Kemp and Martin Clunes in television, film and adverts. His favourite part was performing in a reconstruction as a war time child who was the recipient of a Pride of Britain award



MOVERS & SHAKERS: EDITION 431

Louise Ranford

Operations Manager for English Maths & ESOL, Learn Plus Us

Start date: May 2023

Previous Job: Head of Skills, PILOT IMS

Interesting fact: Louise is an adrenaline junkie and did a wing walk for her 40th birthday, raising money for Acorns Hospice. Whilst it was the most uncomfortable thing she’s done, she is planning to do another one, with a loop the loop!


Joe Turner

Managing Director, Novo Training Group

Start date: June 2023

Previous Job: Managing Director, BCE Group

Interesting fact: When travelling the world Joe spent time living with a tribe in Thailand


Tony Holloway

Operations and Quality Director, Learn Plus Us

Start date: June 2023

Previous Job: Interim Operations Director, Learn Plus Us

Interesting fact: Tony once walked from London to Birmingham (144 Miles) along the grand union canal and then the circumference of the Isle of Wight to raise over £10,000 for a children’s hospice


Engineering training provider scoops another ‘outstanding’

An engineering-specialist training provider has been graded ‘outstanding’ for the second time in six years by Ofsted.

Cheshire-based firm TTE Training retained the top rating in a report published today that praised a “highly ambitious curriculum” which enables learners to be “prepared exceptionally well for working in a highly regulated industry”.

The apprentices themselves are “highly motivated to achieve and are committed to their studies”, inspectors found.

At the time of the inspection in May, the provider had 163 apprentices enrolled on apprenticeship standards, with most of them on level 3 courses. Twenty other learners were on an engineering study programme.

TTE Training was last inspected in 2017 when it also received top Ofsted marks.

Nick Smith, chief executive of TTE Training, told FE Week he was “immensely proud” of everything TTE has achieved since it launched 30 years ago.

“I also feel privileged to lead an organisation which continues to make a vital contribution to the UK’s manufacturing sector generally, and to engineering skills development in the North of England in particular,” he added.

Today’s inspection report explains that apprentices “develop substantial new knowledge and skills beyond the apprenticeship standard”.

The apprentices also have access to a range of activities that “extend beyond their apprenticeship” including leadership, resilience and team working skills, while the learners also have access to young leadership qualifications.

Extensive industry experience

Tutors at TTE were praised for “carefully” monitoring learners and apprentices’ progress, via monthly progress reviews and mentor sessions. Support is also provided when learners fall behind, meaning “almost all apprentices and learners” complete their training and get their qualification.

The staff also have “extensive industry experience which they use exceptionally well to explain key engineering concepts”.

TTE Training offers “ongoing careers advice” meaning that they are aware of all the opportunities open to them and can make “informed decisions” on their future.

The leaders further use a “range of information” to monitor and improve the quality of the education and then quickly make changes to improve the standard.

‘Relentless’ focus on safeguarding

Ofsted also said TTE Training has “effective” safeguarding arrangements, and that they push “relentless[ly]” for safe working practices in the engineering sector.

They respond quickly to any concerns meaning that apprentices are supported and can continue with their studies.

Staff also get regular training on topics such as mental health awareness and the risk of sexual assault, while the learners are “confident” any issues they raise are taken seriously and dealt with swiftly.

ESFA allows ‘inadequate’ apprenticeship provider to keep contract

An engineering and manufacturing specialist training provider has kept its apprenticeship contract despite being given an ‘inadequate’ rating from Ofsted.

Salford and Trafford Engineering Group Training Association (STEGTA) was downgraded from ‘good’ to the lowest possible judgment in March largely because of safeguarding concerns and poor oversight of subcontractors.

Education and Skills Funding Agency policy rules that a provider will usually lose its apprenticeship funding agreement if it receives an ‘inadequate’ verdict from the watchdog, unless there are exceptional circumstances.

STEGTA’s report showed ‘good’ ratings in three of the five fields inspected, including quality of education and apprenticeships. Leadership and management was the only area judged ‘inadequate’, which pulled the overall grade down to the bottom rating.

The provider was only suspended from new starts following the grade four report. It has since been revisited by Ofsted, which conducted a monitoring visit last month and published a report this week which said the provider was making ‘reasonable progress’ in all areas.

John Whitby, STEGTA’s chief executive, told FE Week that the ESFA chose not to terminate contracts and the provider had been “supported through the new ESFA intervention strategy” under its accountability framework.

Under that policy, the ESFA identified the training provider as being “at risk” and placed it under intervention before a monitoring visit inspection.

STEGTA remains on the register of apprenticeship training providers and its temporary ban from recruiting new apprentices has now been lifted, Whitby said. 

The provider delivers level 2 to 4 apprenticeships in engineering, manufacturing and construction, and had 318 learners at the time of the visit. It works with 16 subcontractors.

Ofsted’s monitoring report said the company had carried out a “wholescale review of safeguarding”, which included appointing two additional safeguarding officers.

The watchdog previously said that staff training on safeguarding was “not sufficiently comprehensive”, but since the ‘inadequate’ rating the team is now “appropriately trained and qualified” for their roles. 

It also said the provider addressed the lack of staff awareness around the Prevent strategy, and had started to teach students to understand the risks around radicalisation and extremism.

On top of that, STEGTA had taken “decisive action” to address Ofsted’s concerns that the provider did not assess the quality of the subcontractor provision well enough.

Colleges share £100m for ‘fit for purpose’ T Level-ready buildings

Over £100 million has been allocated for 107 college T Level projects to support delivery of new courses launching in September 2024, the Department for Education has announced today.

The funding, which will enable colleges to create “fit for purpose buildings”, comes from wave five of the T Levels capital fund.

It will support colleges providing T Level courses such as catering & hospitality, hairdressing, business & administration, and agriculture, environmental & animal care.

The T Levels capital fund has two parts to the fund: a building and facilities improvement grant, put out to tender for providers, and a specialist equipment allocation.

While DfE said it was unable to provide the exact amount each college was allocated, several colleges publicised their allocations in statements released to FE Week.

Stoke on Trent College received £1.5 million funding for developing new facilities for health and science and broadcast media.

The funding will be split in half, meaning £750,000 will support the college’s new broadcast and digital media T Level. The remaining half will support the development of two health and science T Levels available from 2024 supporting the care of children and young people and supporting the midwifery team.

Meanwhile, six University Technical Colleges were awarded £7,621,006 of T Level funding between them.

These include £4 million to the London Design and Engineering UTC, £1,029,312 to Brook Sixth Form and Academy, £620,000 to UTC Warrington, £593,093 to UTC Leeds, £389,857 to Global Academy.

Engineering UTC North Lincolnshire was awarded £988,744 for 2024 T Level starts.

UTC Warrington principal Chris Hatherall said the funding will facilitate its engineering and manufacturing T Levels, including the development of a dedicated metrology lab, a new engineering fitting workshop, and a new CAD studio.

Skills minister Robert Halfon said: “This boost of over £100 million is our latest investment in T Levels. These are robust, high quality technical qualifications providing a unique ladder of opportunity for students to gain both classroom knowledge and on-the-job experience.

“From robotics suites that support digital T Levels to simulated health wards where students can get a real sense of what it means to work in Healthcare Science, T Levels will support young people into rewarding careers and back businesses with the skills of the future.”

These are the 107 winning projects announced today:

Without urgent action, we risk losing another generation of vocational learners

Many people reading this piece will know first-hand that the financial scars of the 2008 financial crash, and subsequent austerity measures, continue to undermine further education.

Our latest report, Austerity 2.0: A Lost Generation, details the depth and breadth of these scars in sobering detail, and explores how the comparable shocks of Covid-19, Brexit and the cost-of-living crisis will undermine a new generation of FE learners without urgent action from the government. 

From a helicopter view, we can see the devastating impact of the 2008 crash and austerity on the sector. As the report states, from a high of £7,750 per student in 2010, spending for students in 16-19 educational settings is yet to recover to pre-financial crash levels. 

Projections suggest that this will only rise to around £6,600 per student in the coming years – a 15 per cent decline which fails to account for the economic shocks seen in recent years and will undermine students’ prospects. Moreover, spending on adult further education and apprenticeships will still be 25 per cent lower in 2024/25 compared with 2010/11.

By no coincidence, total apprenticeship starts fell roughly 37 per cent from 2015/20, with Covid then going on to hamper starts in the past few years. The drivers behind starts and engagement with further education are of course complex, but the fragile nature of the sector means the longer-term picture is bleak.

The number of adults projected to be in funded FE, for example, is expected to decrease from 786,053 in 2022/23 down to 614,252 in 2025/26 – a fall of more than 21 per cent – at a time when our economy and labour market is in desperate need of the skills, talents and economic activity of as many people as possible.

This deeply troubling landscape has a significant impact on communities. Among the most deprived quintile of adults, participation in FE fell more than 29 per cent between 2016 and 2020. 

Moreover, the removal of the Education Maintenance Allowance, and similar support levers, has disadvantaged the poorest students seeking to enter FE. Without proper support for further education, the push for true social mobility will always fail.

The government’s rhetoric on support for skills suggests we have begun to turn a corner – for example, through the funding uplift for 16 to 19-year-olds and the latest adult education budget rise. Yet we need to build on this momentum if we are to ensure funding levels go far beyond those seen before the 2008 crash. 

Providing the required funding would ensure all learners can access the same opportunities regardless of their background, and power economic growth regionally and nationally.  

In support of this, we need central government to turbocharge a comprehensive communications campaign which highlights the essential importance of high-quality FE to students, parents, employers and the wider country. This is true for schools, also, whose role in providing careers advice must be overhauled to clearly outline the exciting opportunities available to students who wish to pursue technical and vocational courses.

There is a wider economic imperative, too. Reduced investment in FE means fewer students are entering courses that will enable them to gain the skills and knowledge they need to access high-skilled employment. 

Moreover, it means our businesses and employers cannot depend on the workforce they need to remain competitive internationally. This is particularly significant for key sectors such as digital, tech, health, and social care.

Quite apart from the long-term ramifications of the 2008 crash and austerity, the economic shock of Covid-19 and the unfurling cost-of-living crisis, combined with rapid policy and regulatory change, has left the sector in a fundamentally fragile state. 

The sector needs comprehensive support and transformational new measures to thrive, alongside a recognition that FE is seen as part of the solution to the problems we face as a society. There is, rightly, bold rhetoric about a “world-class skills system”, but this simply cannot be achieved without the funding to match.

Young adults need better funding post-Covid

The West Midlands has a young, diverse and vibrant population. It is a great region to live, to study and to work in, but the impact of Covid has been profound – particularly on the mental health of our young people.

Before the pandemic, we were already seeing an increase in mental health issues affecting students at all levels and of all ages, but primarily among those from disadvantaged areas and backgrounds. Lockdowns, Covid restrictions and lack of adequate access to education and training only served to exacerbate this further. 

For many, this has had a serious impact on their studies.

The nature of vocational studies, coupled with the learning needs of students from many of our most disadvantaged wards, has meant that large numbers of young people have missed key elements of their education, including basic social and study skills. 

For some, this has been compounded by a lack of access to technology and to family support. And it is now being exacerbated by anxiety about finances and the increased cost of living.

At South and City College in Birmingham, our key focus is to educate and train young people for their future employment. This primarily means providing teaching and learning in classrooms and workshops. 

However, the increasing prevalence of mental health issues among our students – resulting in poor attendance or behaviour, physical difficulties, attention problems, and difficulties in completing work etc – is presenting serious challenges for how we can achieve this. 

Over the past year, we have sought to address this through a pilot scheme that employs a small number of specialist staff who support students with serious mental health issues. While this has had made a massive impact on our students, the cost of this support is simply too high to expand it within current levels of funding – particularly for students aged 19-plus.

While the level of funding for 16-18 study programmes is becoming increasingly insufficient, it does enable us to provide a far greater level of support than is possible for equivalent learners aged 19-plus, where funding is only available for individual qualifications, rather than for wider wrap-around support and enrichment activities – a funding gap of around £1,200 per person. 

This is not only unfair for learners and financially challenging for colleges, but also risks adding to our regional challenge around increasing youth unemployment and inactivity.

To help address this inequality, we made the case to the West Midlands Combined Authority (WMCA) as part of their recent level 3 consultation that they should implement a full study programme approach to funding level 2 and level 3 qualifications for young adults aged 19-23. 

And we have been extremely pleased to see that this will be introduced from September 2023 – a clear demonstration of the benefits to learners and to colleges of skills devolution, through co-development of solutions that can make a difference to our learners and the local labour market.  

We anticipate that this will help us to reach more young people and enable them to achieve level 2 and 3 qualifications. Longer term, this should also reduce demand on public services such as employment support and the NHS.

As a next step, we will continue to work with WMCA as they seek to implement the findings of the West Midlands Mental Health Commission by creating a new “Thrive at College” programme as part of our wider work and health offer for the region.

SEND college to close after second ‘inadequate’ rating

A specialist college for young people with autism is to close after being given an ‘inadequate’ Ofsted rating for the second time in a year.

Farleigh Further Education College in Frome, Somerset, owned by Aspris Children’s Services, told FE Week that it will shut the college at the end of the summer term due to “ongoing shortcomings” in provision.

The college said it has “no viable option” but to close. “We are sorry for the disruption this will cause,” a spokesperson added.

As of May, the college had 24 learners aged 16 to 25 with autism. All are in receipt of high needs funding.

During its inspection in early May, inspectors found that staff did not take “a small minority” of cases seriously enough when learners reported bullying or harassment. 

The report also found learners’ attendance was too low and staff did not help learners to catch up after an absence.

Inspectors questioned staff teaching methods and a failure to plan curriculum content well enough so it accounts for what learners already know and can do.

While arrangements for safeguarding were effective, inspectors criticised the college’s “minimal” careers guidance and advice to learners and said there was little oversight of skills that learners gained on work placements, leading to “too slow” progress from learners developing work-appropriate skills.

At its last full inspection in February 2022, when the college was given its first ‘inadequate’ rating which prompted the headteacher to step down, inspectors made the same critique over Farleigh’s slow action to address learner reports of bullying and discrimination.

Since then, the college has undergone two monitoring visits, the latest of which was in March this year. Inspectors said the college was making reasonable process to implement improvements.

A spokesperson for the college said: “We set ourselves high minimum standards for the quality of education and support to be delivered, and it has become clear that the college will not be able to meet the required level within what we consider to be an acceptable timeframe.

“As a responsible provider, we have therefore found ourselves with no viable option but to close the service, as we are not prepared to deliver a standard of education, we consider unacceptable in the medium- to long-term.”