Adrian Bailey has told his “disappointment” at losing the chair of the Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) Select Committee after Iain Wright wrestled the position away in a second round of MPs’ voting.

West Bromwich West MP Mr Bailey held the position for the last Parliament, leading inquiries into apprenticeships and adult numeracy and literacy among others, but lost to Hartlepool MP Mr Wright by 247 votes to 281, it was announced today.

City of Durham MP Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods had dropped out of contention in the all-Labour field after the first round of voting last night having won 165 votes to Mr Bailey’s 197 and Mr Wright’s 218.

Mr Bailey said: “Obviously I am disappointed to lose but Iain has great expertise and interest in FE and its link to productivity in the economy.

“I am sure he will use it to strengthen government policy in this area.”

Mr Wright, a former Apprenticeships Minister under Gordon Brown, enjoyed the backing of former education committee members Ian Mearns, Alex Cunningham and Bill Esterton. Dr Blackman-Woods had been backed by former Shadow Education Minister Rushanara Ali and former Shadow Skills Minister Gordon Marsden.

Meanwhile, Stroud MP Neil Carmichael will lead the Education Select Committee after also being taken to a second round in the alternative voting system that was employed for committee chair appointments for just the second time. He beat Tim Loughton, MP for East Worthing and Shoreham, by 294 votes to 252.

Caroline Nokes, MP for Romsey and Southampton North, had made up the rest of the all-Conservative field but dropped out after the first round, in which she received 182 votes to Mr Carmichael’s 224 and Mr Loughton’s 191.

Mr Carmichael, who takes over from Graham Stuart, said: “I am very excited by the opportunity. First of all I am delighted that obviously so many people voted for me, I don’t know the figure yet but I am very pleased. Secondly I am obviously really exhilarated with the challenge ahead in terms of the reports we will be able to have through the next five years.”

He said the next issue he had to address was the committee’s make-up of MP members.

“I have heard one or two people express and interest in joining and so when they are all appointed we will get on with the task of doing some reports,” said Mr Carmichael.

“One thing I am going to be doing very soon is discuss with the new Business, Innovation and Skills chair, Iain Wright, our proposal of doing a joint report on dealing with productivity gap. We have already discussed this on the assumption that we both would win, we actually talked about it a week or so ago.”

Mr Stuart, Conservative MP for Beverley and Holderness, held the post during the last Parliament and had been a committee member for a further three, but put his name forward to become chair of the culture, media and sport committee. However, the role went to Conservative MP for Hereford and South Herefordshire Jesse Norman.

The political make-up of both committees is yet to be announced and will be decided through negotiations between the political parties. The parties will then hold internal elections to decide who takes their shares of seats.

In the last Parliament, the two committees each had five Conservative members, five Labour members and one Liberal Democrat member.

Of the previous membership of the BIS committee, Scottish Labour MPs Ann McKechin, William Bain and Katy Clark lost their seats in the election, as did Liberal Democrat Mike Crockart, while Conservative Brian Binley stood down.

Labour MP Paul Blomfield and Conservatives Caroline Dinenage, Rebecca Harris, Robin Walker and Nadhim Zahawi remain in Parliament, but Ms Dinenage, Mr Walker and Ms Harris will not seek election to committees having received government jobs.

Of the last education committee’s membership, all but former Liberal Democrat Bradford East MP David Ward were re-elected to Parliament in May, including Labour MPs Pat Glass and Siobhan McDonagh and Conservatives Dominic Raab and Craig Whittaker, although Mr Raab has a government job.

Internal party elections of committee members are expected to take several weeks now the chairs have been elected.

Main pic above, from left: Adrian Bailey, Iain Wright and Neil Carmichael

 

 

Hundreds of staff and students from FE colleges descended on Parliament yesterday as part of an FE Week-backed campaign against funding cuts to adult education.

The lobby event, organised by the University and College Union (UCU), gave FE staff the chance to explain directly to their MPs the impact the reduction in the adult skills budget (ASB) was having on their classrooms.

It has been estimated that the ASB has been reduced by 35 per cent since 2009, and funding for adults over the age of 19 on non-apprenticeship courses is set to be slashed by up to a further 24 per cent in 2015/16, as was announced in March.

Additionally, a further £450m is due to be cut from the Department for Business Innovation and Skills (BIS) in-year budget with FE earmarked to provide some of the savings, while the same figure is is set to be cut from the Department for Education.

Sussex Coast College A-level history lecturer Justin Wynne was among the protesters and he said the cuts were “devastating” and were having a “detrimental effect” in his college already.

“We are seeing increasing class sizes to create efficiency savings,” he said. “Which although it’s not necessarily a bad thing in some areas is going to have a detrimental effect in some areas, particularly A-level, where class sizes will increase into the late 20s and 30s.”

“The amount of time students get too – ideally students are supposed to have 540 guided learning hours, but to make efficiency cuts, they’re increasing how much you deliver in a week to get the most out of each member of staff, increasing their workload therefore the balance between work and home is damaged, increasing stress.”

Sara Romero, a support worker at Falmouth Marine College, part of Cornwall College, agreed.

“There’s definitely been an impact on the front-line work I’m doing – there’s less support for people who need the support and there are plenty of them,” she said.

“There are redundancies, fewer teachers, disenchantment, people don’t feel valued, students are not getting the best service that they can and neither are the teachers that work there.”

In response to the cuts, many colleges have already begun to shed jobs – in the last few months Leeds City College has announced 146 possible job losses, as have Bradford College (140), East Kent (40), Lewisham and Southwark (112), Petroc (no figure announced), Stafford (no figure) and Telford (85) colleges, along with Birmingham Metropolitan, where 250 posts were at risk.

Sally Hunt, UCU general secretary, said around 200 MPs — more than a third of England’s MPs — were contacted as part of the event.

She said it was “a lobby very early on [in the Parliament] that will be telling MPs about how much we care about FE in our communities and how very, very scared and angry we are as representatives of those colleges about what this government is doing to FE”.

She said: “It is not enough to say ‘we care about FE and we want to protect it’.

“What we need out of today are positive substantial commitments from your MP to say they will do every thing they can, in the chamber, with this government, with the relevant departments to lobby on our behalf to protect what we know is an important part of every town.”

The event was backed by Green MP Caroline Lucas. She said: “I think it’s no exaggeration to say that the very existence of adult education is in jeopardy.”

Skills Minister Nick Boles spoke in Parliament last week to defend the cuts. On the 24 per cent cut, he said the government was justified in its attempts to focus funding on apprenticeships and away from areas of “lower value”, citing government survey figures which he claimed showed that a level three apprenticeship boosted earnings by 16 per cent, while a level three non-apprenticeship course boosted earnings by just 4 per cent.

He said: “I am not for a minute suggesting full time FE courses don’t have a positive impact, they do, but their positive impact on people’s earnings are not as high, not nearly as high, as apprenticeships.”

A UCU petition calling for the cuts to be reversed, and believed to have been signed by more than 42,000 people, is expected to be handed in to Parliament in the next few weeks.

Visit www.fefunding.org.uk/sign-the-petition to sign the petition.

Andy Burnham has said apprenticeships and technical education are central to his bid to become the next Labour leader.

The Leigh MP made the comments during a speech he gave in Crewe this morning as part of his leadership campaign.

Mr Burnham announced he would be establishing an “expert panel”, led by Pat Glass MP, which he said would “advise me on how we can make parity between academic and technical education a reality”.

He also repeated his pledge to extend maintenance loans to apprentices, a suggestion which caused a backlash on Twitter last week when he was mistakenly thought to have been considering a return for the failed apprentice FE tuition loans policy.

Mr Burnham said: “Why shouldn’t young people who want a technical education be given help to travel across the country, and relocate there like university students, to get access to the best courses?

“The life chances of too many young people are left to chance, depending on where they live, or who they know.

“If the same kind of financial support for students was available to apprentices, then they would be able to move to a different part of the country to complete the training best suited to them.

“The best candidates would be matched to the best placements.”

He called for change to start with the language used to describe training, which he said was “coded and vague”.

“If we want to value quality apprenticeships, let’s call them what they are: a technical education,” he said.

“Speaking with a bit of clarity has got to be the first step to giving our young people a clear choice about their careers.”

He said young people who aspire to go to university route had “clear goals to aim for”, while others did not, causing them to “lose their way”.

He said: “When starting school, the message to all young people should be clear: if you put in the hours, and if you meet the required standard, you will gain a solid, prestigious qualification which will open up a good opportunity for you beyond school.

“That could be a place at university. Or it could mean a high-quality apprenticeship.”

He also repeated promises for a Ucas-style system for apprenticeships, similar to the Ucas Progress scheme currently being delivered.

He said such a scheme could “do a huge amount to lift aspirations in this country”.

 

Picture: Creative Commons/NHS Confederation.

Former Education Secretary Lord Baker is celebrating the first outstanding grade from Ofsted for his university technical college (UTC) project with a glowing inspection report for UTC Reading.

The report on the UTC, which opened in 2013 specialising in science and engineering for 14 to 19-year-olds and is listed as a school by the education watchdog, is due out on Monday — but UTC bosses were so keen to get the positive message out they released it today.

It got grade one ratings across the six headline fields of overall effectiveness, leadership and management, behaviour, quality of teaching, achievement of students and sixth form provision.

Inspectors, who visited last month, praised the “inspiring leadership” of principal Joanne Harper (pictured below right), and said the governors and business partners, including Cisco, Microsoft, and Network Rail, were “knowledgeable and highly effective”, which contributed to the “outstanding achievement” of learners.

Ms Harper said the UTC was “characterised by excellent working relationships with its industry partners,” giving learners the “best possible foundations for their future careers”.

She added: “Our partners have helped to shape the curriculum and continue to work with us to set projects, offer work experience and providing mentoring.

“This is what sets the school apart and we are delighted that this has been reflected in the comments from the Ofsted inspectors.”

Lord Baker, who set up the Baker Dearing Trust to promote UTCs, of which there are 30 currently open and a further 20 due to open by 2017, said: “Ofsted rightly say that it is an outstanding school – one that provides an excellent technical education for aspirational young people that fits very well with the needs of local employers.”

The grade one rating comes with question marks continuing to hover over the UTCs project, with attendance and recruitment problems having been identified at several. Indeed, the grade one result at UTC Reading comes despite the fact it was running at 44.5 per cent of its capacity in April of this year.

Hackney UTC has confirmed it is to close this summer along with Black Country UTC, which was hit with the second inadequate rating from Ofsted last month for a UTC following that of Central Bedfordshire UTC last summer. The failure of the Black Country UTC has also seen Skills Minister Nick Boles pledge to “look at the programme” to consider whether it was “as successful as it can possibly be” before opening any more.

Nevertheless, Activate Learning, the organisation behind Reading UTC, Reading College, City of Oxford College, Banbury and Bicester College, is planning another UTC in Didcot to open in September. And Activate was also praised for its business-like ethos, which meant learners were “prepared exceptionally well for their future lives”.

Activate Learning chief executive Sally Dicketts (pictured below left) said: “Prior to the launch of UTCs young people had to make a choice between school and college.

“UTCs now combine the best of vocational and academic learning, providing students with a curriculum that develops higher-level thinking and applies it in a practical setting.

“This unique offering adds real value and choice to our educational system and UTC Reading is an excellent example of the model.”

Colleges which are good at “what they do on a daily basis” should not prepare for inspection under Ofsted’s reformed regime, the watchdog’s head of FE and skills has said.

Ofsted director Lorna Fitzjohn told delegates at the launch of the new common inspection framework (CIF) and short inspections regime that those FE providers already offering a “good” education to learners should not fear reprisals.

Speaking after the introduction of the new framework by chief inspector Sir Michael Wilshaw, in which Sir Michael announced that new inspections of “good” institutions would be conducted on the assumption that the provider was still “good”, Ms Fitzjohn warned FE leaders against trying to prepare.

She said: “The big message is don’t prepare for inspection. It really is about coming to see what you do on a daily basis, and if you’re really good at that, you don’t need to prepare for inspection.”

As revealed by FE Week last August, the CIF, which brings the inspection of FE and skills providers into line with early years and schools, will see inspectors no longer grading individual subject areas, but judging providers on “personal development, behaviour and welfare” of learners, while also increasing the emphasis on safeguarding when assessing leadership and management.

Under new short inspections, FE providers previously rated good will be inspected every three years instead of every five or six, but inspections will last as few as two days and with as few as two inspectors per visit.

Ms Fitzjohn told the launch event at Westminster’s Central Hall acknowledged the FE sector was already well-versed in what a CIF was, having been through several guises of its own.

She said: “The word CIF isn’t new to the FE sector. It’s now been stolen by schools, but I just think we’re trailblazers, we are setting the way with that. But we now not only have a CIF for FE and skills, we have a CIF right across most of what Ofsted inspects.”

Ms Fitzjohn said there were elements which were “very much the same as the last framework”, but added that the watchdog was “moving away” from inspection based on learners gaining a certain number of qualifications to “what a college or provider actually does to prepare that young person for work”.

She added: “I think the personal development and welfare grade really gives us an opportunity to celebrate much of what is done by the sector within that area.”

Ms Fitzjohn also set out how short inspections could be “converted” into full inspections within 15 days if it was felt the provider under scrutiny had slipped from a “good” rating or could achieve an “outstanding”, but admitted it “wasn’t easy” for large, multi-site colleges.

Other initiatives announced at the event included plans for eight regional “scrutiny committees” to independently screen Ofsted’s work and proposals to boost the watchdog’s in-house service, with a pledge that 7 out of 10 inspectors will be current practitioners within the field they are inspecting by September.

Gill Clipson, deputy chief executive of the Association of Colleges (AoC), welcomed the fact inspections of good colleges would be based on the assumption they had not got worst, adding: “Too often we hear from colleges that inspection teams begin from a negative hypothesis which is dispiriting to say the least.

“We are also pleased to see that the Ofsted complaints procedure is to be made transparent as this is something AoC has long been calling for.

“The introduction of a scrutiny committee in each Ofsted region, made up of inspectors and leading head teachers and principals who are not inspectors, will mean that complaints are fully examined.”

Awarding organisations could be forced to withdraw qualifications with units shared with other bodies after Ofqual announced plans to close its “unit bank”.

Under the proposals set out in a letter from the regulator, awarding organisations have until July 31 to withdraw units shared and developed with others or allow those competitors to “treat them as their own”.

If units are withdrawn, awarding organisations will have two years to replace them in their qualifications and get them approved or withdraw the qualifications completely. 

The closure of the unit bank is happening as part of moves to scrap the qualifications and credit framework, but it means units on the system will have to be withdrawn by the awarding organisations which developed them unless they want competitors “treating them as their own”.

In the letter, Ofqual’s director of strategic relationships for vocational qualifications Naomi Nicholson, said the regulator would assume that awarding organisations which did not get in touch by July 31 did not intend to withdraw any units currently being used by other bodies and that they “do not object to the awarding organisations currently using those units treating them as their own”.

Ms Nicholson added that Ofqual would also assume that awarding organisations which did not get in touch recognised that other bodies would “rely on these assumptions”.

Organisations which don’t agree with “some or all” of the assumptions have until 5pm on July 31 to provide Ofqual with reference numbers for units planned for withdrawal from shared use and notify all other bodies using the shared units.

She added: “It remains our view that the appropriate notice period for withdrawing units will be two years.”

To inform Ofqual about withdrawal of units, email regulatory.relationships@ofqual.gov.uk

Skills Minister Nick Boles has reiterated his commitment to make it illegal to misuse the word “apprenticeships”.

Mr Boles, Education Secretary Nicky Morgan and the rest of their team faced a grilling from MPs on government education policy in this afternoon’s education questions in the House of Commons.

Mr Boles also suggested the funding rate for 18-year-olds, currently 17.5 per cent less than the rate for 16 and 17-year-olds, could be re-examined next year, but that the FE budget announced in March for 2015/16 definitely would not change.

Mr Boles told the House of Commons: “We will be requiring all public sector bodies to employ apprentices, and will legislate to protect the term apprentice from misuse.”

As previously reported by feweek.co.uk, the proposals from the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS), are expected to be introduced to Parliament in the autumn as part of the government’s enterprise bill.

Mr Boles also defended the government’s record on apprenticeships after Labour MP Liz McInnes pointed out that almost 40 per cent of the 440,000 apprenticeship starts in 2013/14 were by learners over the age of 25.

Mr Boles said: “We do not share with the opposition this obsession with the idea that anyone over 25 doing an apprenticeship is wasting their time of the government’s money.”

Conservative MP and education committee chair hopeful Caroline Nokes asked if the DfE would consider reviewing the lower funding rate for 18-year-olds.

Mr Boles described the funding rate cut as “a difficult decision” that the government “did have to make” and he agreed with Ms Nokes’ comments that those who study for an extra year at the age of 18 were often some of the most vulnerable young people.

He added: “The Chancellor will be looking at this in the spending review.”

However, he said the FE funding allocations announced in March for the 2015/16 academic year would be unaffected by the announcement last week of a £450m cut from the DfE budget.

He said: “I can confirm that the allocations that were announced in March for 16 to 19 education for the 2015/16 academic year remain in place and we are not planning to change them.”