Apprenticeships: Bounce-back stalls and disparities persist

The post-pandemic bounce-back in apprenticeships starts doesn’t appear to be sustained and age disparities continue to widen, writes Lisa Coulthard

The post-pandemic bounce-back in apprenticeships starts doesn’t appear to be sustained and age disparities continue to widen, writes Lisa Coulthard

4 Feb 2023, 5:00

Last week, the DfE published its latest statistics on the number of apprenticeships being started. These fell by 69 per cent between 2015/16 and 2021/22, primarily due to reforms to the apprenticeship system coupled with disruption created by the Covid pandemic. So what does the latest data tell us about the extent of the recovery?

A bumpy ride

The Government introduced a raft of reforms to the apprenticeship system in the past decade. These were aimed at addressing concerns about the quality, length and content of apprenticeships and were intended to improve their responsiveness to employer needs.

However, NFER research has shown that these reforms have had a substantial impact on the number of apprenticeships being started, particularly among young people.

We know from tracking the data that total new apprenticeships starts fell from 509,000 in 2015/16 to 393,000 in 2018/19. They then fell further to around 320,000 over the following two years, primarily due to the pandemic, before recovering in 2021/22 to 349,000.

We also know that this overall trend masks substantial differences between apprenticeship levels. The pattern for intermediate (Level 2) and advanced (Level 3) apprenticeships starts have the same downward trend as for total starts. Meanwhile, higher (Level 4+) apprenticeships have grown sharply. There are almost four times as many higher apprenticeship starts than in 2015/16, albeit from a low base, and they have now surpassed intermediate starts.     

A post-pandemic bounce-back?

In short, the initial evidence from DfE’s recent statistics is that the post-pandemic rebound has not been sustained. These statistics, which provide data about apprenticeship starts during the first quarter of the 2022/23 academic year (for August-October 2022, so not full-year figures), show total starts were down by 6.1 per cent compared to the same period in the previous year.

This may be a temporary blip as starts could pick up in the remaining quarters. However, one possible reason for the decline is the withdrawal of the £3,000 incentive payment scheme in March 2022 that the government had introduced during the pandemic to encourage employers to take on new apprentices.

The recent statistics also show starts vary significantly by type of apprenticeship. After strongly bouncing back post-Covid, intermediate apprenticeship starts have been worst affected, falling by nearly one-fifth (18.4 per cent) from Q1 of 2021/22 and Q1 of 2022/23. Advanced apprenticeships are also down by nearly one-tenth (9.2 per cent) over the same time period. However, higher level start numbers march on, increasing by 10 per cent across the time period.

This data therefore suggests that apprenticeship starts are returning to the long-term trends seen before the post-pandemic bounce-back, with intermediate and advanced apprenticeship starts continuing their decline while higher level apprenticeships flourish.

As highlighted in previous NFER research, the reasons for this are complex and multi-faceted. Potential solutions include looking at the current funding system, the qualification offering at intermediate level and improving access to apprenticeships.

Apprenticeship starts by age

With regard to longer-term trends in apprenticeship starts by age, we find that all age groups broadly follow the same decline trend described above for total apprenticeship starts. Among them, under 19s have been particularly affected, falling to half the level of 2015/16 starts in 2020/21, before recovering slightly.

Looking at DfE’s most recent statistics, these show that starts for the 19- to 24-year-old group has fallen sharply by 11.4 per cent between Q1 of 2021/22 and the same point this year. Conversely, starts for under 19s have dropped by 4.1 per cent while starts for the 25+ group fell by 3.5 per cent.     

As apprenticeships take centre stage in the government’s strategy to upskill and reskill the workforce to meet skills shortages, these new statistics serve as a reminder that improvements are urgently required. This is particularly the case for the recruitment of under 19s onto intermediate and advanced apprenticeships, to ensure that there is a clear and effective pathway for young people to progress into higher-level training or employment.

More from this theme

Apprenticeships, Higher education

Revealed: UCAS’ points plan for apprenticeships

Higher education admissions body UCAS reveals how many UCAS points level 3 apprenticeships will be worth

Shane Chowen
Apprenticeships

Employers renew calls for youth ‘apprenticeship guarantee’ 

The idea was first proposed by government in 2009 and resurfaced in 2020 before being quickly dropped

Billy Camden
Apprenticeships

New off-the-job apprenticeship flexibility set for 2024/25

Active learning can take place every 3 months from August for front-loaded or block release apprenticeships

Billy Camden
Apprenticeships

EPA on trial: DfE to test alternative apprenticeship assessments

Several options are on the table to speed up apprenticeship assessments...but at what cost?

Shane Chowen
Apprenticeships

Shared apprenticeship scheme barely meets half its recruitment target

Flexible construction apprenticeship starts tumble amid sector-wide recruitment issues

Anviksha Patel
Apprenticeships, Ofsted

Uni caught short after fast-tracking degree apprenticeship for NHS

Ofsted found some employers' operational needs for advanced clinical practitioners weren't being met

Josh Mellor

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 Comments

  1. Anonymous

    It is no surprise that over the last few years that 16-19 apprenticeships have declined significantly. The reforms have been disastrous for the sectors which usually support this age group into their first jobs and training support . The funding bands set by IFATE clearly do not reflect the real term costs it takes to deliver lower level courses (£3k for some) and show a lack of respect and importance placed on these career choices made by young people who need this support most! Remember Business Admin level 2 … deemed by IFATE not worthy of an apprenticeship. Young people often gained real value developing employment skills via this route now gone. Child care, adult care , Hairdressing all very popular sectors have had funding bands slashed since reformed . Many ITPs who were brilliant at employer engagement in these sectors have now disappeared because they can no longer afford to run these specialties. University and HE colleges jumping on bandwagon to offer the higher level degree apprenticeship with extortions funding bands up to 27k ! This is why adult apprenticeships have soared and the management apprenticeship increased as employees accessed high funding bands for employees already in service. It doesn’t need a consultant and statistics to show impact and decline. Speak to the ITPs who can tell you the reasons , these figures are not a surprise to the experts …..who are now out of business and many young peoples options now gone.

    • Anonymous

      I kindly disagree with some of the comments made here. Firstly degree apprenticeships that are funded at £27,000 are delivered over 5 years plus another year for end point assessment. If you take the funding per year, it is not much higher than what is funded at levels 2 and 3 at £4,320 per year. The other point I want to make is that higher apprenticeships and the demand for them is driven by employers and the skills they need to fill. For example, the Nursing Associate programme was crucial during the pandemic to recruit and train the workforce the NHS needed at a difficult time. These apprentices tend to be older and mostly female who are wishing to progress from minimum wage pay to better paid careers. I think this is a valuable use of the system. Not only saving lives but supprting social mobility and progression.