Why 16-19 education is a critical piece of the curriculum and assessment review puzzle 

This often overlooked phase of education is critical to the government's mission-led approach and requires greater clarity

This often overlooked phase of education is critical to the government's mission-led approach and requires greater clarity

22 Dec 2024, 5:00

When Professor Becky Francis presents her findings from the curriculum and assessment review next year, the media and commentators are likely to focus on their implications for school-aged children taking GCSEs and A levels.

However, it is crucial that the needs of 16- to 19-year-olds taking vocational and technical qualifications are not lost. Overlooking this critical phase risks neglecting a key part of the puzzle. 

The choices students make about their post-16 steps are shaped by their earlier experiences. A school curriculum that is overly narrow or focused solely on academic options risks closing off minds, as well as opportunity.  

While academic qualifications like A Levels, vocational qualifications like BTECs and technical qualifications like T Levels differ in content and structure, they share a common goal: to equip young people with the knowledge, skills and experiences to succeed in further education and the workforce.

And yet these routes are not currently valued or understood equally. The review must address this disparity, ensuring every pathway is seen as a viable, high-quality option, not just for students heading to university but also for those pursuing higher vocational or technical education, apprenticeships or direct employment. 

It is welcome that one of the review’s core aims is ensuring our young people are ready for a changing workplace. For this to truly succeed, the review must be part of a joined-up approach to policy development across Whitehall.  

Sir Keir Starmer’s mission-led approach to government aims to challenge siloed government departments – and the skills agenda is a central component here. The recent industrial strategy green paper underscored the critical importance of equipping people with skills for emerging sectors like digital, green technology and advanced manufacturing.

However, these ambitions risk stalling unless we provide the whole further education system – encompassing colleges, sixth forms and training providers – with the support and resources they need to thrive.

This will define young people’s futures and the strength of our economy

As an example, accelerating engineering as part of the UK economy will require 41,000 skilled engineers. This needs to be reflected in the curriculum, prioritising and supporting the pathways that will make this a reality. For example, 14,000 Level 3 BTEC National students take an engineering qualification each year and nearly 8,000 study a Higher National Certificate or Diploma.  

Too often, qualifications are reformed or defunded without sufficient consultation or consideration of the impact on learners and the wider skills system, or sufficient understanding of the role that 16-19 education plays in engaging our young people to positive paths through life in this crucial phase of their journey into adulthood.

That is why this review should prioritise not only clarity and consistency of purpose in 16-19 pathways but also ensure there is a strongly progressive, comprehensive suite of options for learners which will take them from wherever they are at age 16 to somewhere richer, higher and more successful.  

I was inspired by the incredible passion and commitment of the educators recognised at the recent Pearson national teaching awards. It’s clear to me that none of these changes will be possible without supporting and empowerting the dedicated teachers responsible for bringing the curriculum to life in both FE colleges and schools.

The curriculum and assessment review must prioritise the essential role of professional development, ensuring teachers are equipped to deliver high-quality, future-focused education. This requires not only access to training but also the removal of policy barriers that limit innovation and flexibility in the classroom. 

How we prioritise 16-19 education today will define young people’s futures and the strength of our economy. Whether their path is academic, vocational or technical, all young people deserve an education that equips them for a fast-changing world.

It’s time for policymakers to invest in bold, forward-thinking solutions that ensure every young person is prepared to thrive in the economy of tomorrow. 

Latest education roles from

Finance Director – South Devon College

Finance Director – South Devon College

FEA

Assistant Principal – Adult Skills – West London College

Assistant Principal – Adult Skills – West London College

FEA

Assistant Principal – West London College

Assistant Principal – West London College

FEA

Head of Finance

Head of Finance

Jewish Community Academy Trust

Sponsored posts

Sponsored post

What you missed in the post-16 consultation response

With the publication of the government’s response to the post-16 skills pathway consultation, there’s been lots of media outlets...

Advertorial
Sponsored post

Apprenticeship reform: An opportunity to future‑proof skills and unlock career pathways

The apprenticeship landscape is undergoing one of its most significant transformations in decades, and that’s good news for learners,...

Advertorial
Sponsored post

Stronger learners start with supported educators

Further Education (FE) and skills professionals show up every day to change lives. They problem-solve, multi-task and can carry...

Advertorial
Sponsored post

Preparing learners for work, not just exams: the case for skills-led learning

As further education (FE) continues to adapt to shifting labour markets, digital transformation and widening participation agendas, providers are...

Advertorial

More from this theme

Young people

Employers offered £3,000 sweeteners to hire unemployed young people

SMEs will also be able to claim £2,000 for taking on 16-24 year old apprentices

Shane Chowen
Politics, Young people

More detail to come on 16-19 funding, says Phillipson

Education secretary responds to outcry from college leaders after breaking white paper pledge of real-terms 16-19 funding increase

Shane Chowen
Colleges, Young people

Population-spiked colleges scrabble for cash ahead of real-terms funding cut

Real-terms base rate cut of 0.5% could force principals to reevaluate provision and staff pay

Anviksha Patel
Young people

Teaching hours cut ‘not enough to revive T Levels’

College leaders doubt that putting the 'bloated' courses on a diet will be the silver bullet ministers hope for

Billy Camden

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *