Skip to content
14 July 2026

‘Not the end of the road’ for apprenticeship funding restrictions, Smith suggests

Skills minister makes case for more reforms that favour people starting careers

Billy Camden

More from this author
5 min read
|
Skills minister Jacqui Smith speaking at AELP's 2026 national conference

Jacqui Smith has refused to rule out further restrictions that shift apprenticeship funding towards young people, warning it is “not the end of the road” for reform following the recent defunding round.

Speaking to FE Week after announcing a review of apprenticeship funding bands, the skills minister re-asserted the government’s determination to “pivot” the system towards younger apprentices, and failed to guarantee that future reforms would not include additional age restrictions or the defunding of standards.

The Department for Work and Pensions has asked Skills England to review funding bands for apprenticeships that support government priorities, with a view to increasing rates where provision for younger people is considered more expensive or risky to deliver.

But ministers have not allocated any new money to pay for potential uplifts, prompting concern that employers and providers could face further cuts elsewhere in the programme.

Smith said any funding band increases would come from within the apprenticeship budget, currently set at £3.3 billion, which has been fully spent in recent years.

“We have already made some decisions that have shifted resources around,” she told FE Week, citing the decision to remove levy funding for level 7 apprenticeships for over-21s and the defunding of 16 apprenticeship standards, including popular management courses, used largely by older employees.

Meanwhile, a long-awaited level 2 administration assistant apprenticeship set to launch in August will only be available to learners aged under 25.

“The overarching objective here is to shift the apprenticeship system back towards younger people,” Smith added.

Starts for under-25s have fallen 40 per cent over the past decade, while more than one million young people are now not in education, employment or training.

No plans ‘at the moment’

Pressed on whether some apprenticeship funding bands in non-priority areas would be decreased to make way for rate uplifts, Smith insisted ministers were “not proposing at the moment to reduce funding levels for any apprenticeships”.

Asked directly whether there would be more defunding exercises similar to the recent removal of 16 apprenticeships, she replied: “Not at this moment, no.”

Smith also denied that further age restrictions were being planned.

But after her FE Week interview and her speech at the Association of Employment and Learning Providers’ (AELP) national conference, Smith signalled that ministers were not finished with reforms.

“I don’t think we can continue in a way where we are coming back every year and saying we’re going to defund some standards,” she said during an audience Q&A.

“But I don’t think this is the end of the road in terms of reforms that we might want to put in place to help that shift to young people.”

The comments come amid fears ministers will need to find further savings within the apprenticeship budget if they want to increase funding rates without securing additional Treasury support.

Alongside a package of cash incentives for employers to hire young apprentices, ministers have also rolled out foundation apprenticeships and apprenticeship units – enabling employers to use their levy funds for non-apprenticeship training for the first time.

And ministers set a precedent by handing £140 million of the apprenticeship budget to mayors to fund an apprentice brokerage pilot, which appears to be the first time apprenticeship levy funds have been used to fund initiatives beyond training and incentives.

Bust budget

The government increased the apprenticeship budget by £180 million between 2025-26 and 2026-27, taking total spending to £3.3 billion.

It followed the first-ever overspend of the apprenticeship budget in 2024-25, which forced the government to inject £345 million and pushed total spending beyond £3 billion in 2025-26.

Smith could not say whether the apprenticeship budget would be increased further in future years.

“It’s hard for me to say what we’ll be able to persuade the Treasury to do,” she said.

However, she argued apprenticeships would remain a priority regardless of who succeeds Keir Starmer as Labour leader.

“Young people in particular, the opportunities offered by apprenticeships, is not an area that this government, under whichever leadership, is going to be de-prioritising.”

Providers expected to ‘pivot’ to youth

Smith said the funding band review was needed because employers and providers had consistently told ministers that younger apprentices cost more to train and present greater delivery risks.

She hopes increased funding rates will incentivise providers to turn their delivery focus to those standards mostly taken by young people.

“One reason for doing this is because employers and training providers tell us that it is more expensive and more risky to train young people, so that needs to be reflected in the funding bands,” she said.

“If we want providers to be willing to lean into that pivot that we’ve been quite clear that we’re making in the system to young people, one of the ways that we can signal that is by increasing those funding bands.”

Co-investment proof announcement

Smith also used her AELP speech to announce that the government will no longer require training providers to prove that they have collected co-investment from employers before completion payments are paid.

Simon Ashworth, AELP deputy CEO and director of policy, said: “Decoupling the link between collecting all the co-investment and releasing the completion payment to providers is welcome news.

“The current situation penalises providers operating on tight margins, so this change should help their cash flow. It will also see a reduction in bureaucracy and administrative burden, alongside an uptick in achievement rates.”

Share

Explore more on these topics

3 Comments

  1. Steve Hewitt

    Slightly confused by Simon’s last comment there? All the learners who are having their completion payments withheld are, by definition, finished and with pass rates in the very high 90s already I don’t see how this (very welcome, don’t get me wrong!) change increases achievement? No one’s leaving learners as continued or failed just because they haven’t got the Employer Contributions, that would be doubly perverse…

  2. Mick Lomas

    Jacqui Smith and the government seem to be blind that the majority of businesses and organisations are not seeing any growth in their production. This means they are cash strapped to look at new hires, where recruitment is taking place they are continuing to recruit experinced workers and sadly not looking at the future workforce. The current incentives of 2-3k generally may only work if offering the apprenticeship minimum wage. This in itself puts younger people off the apprenticeship route through not being valued. Where apprenticeships are attractive these need to be at least minimum wage, but then employers cant afford that.

    1. Blake

      What I feel that is also missed in all of this prioritising the standards that attract young people, is that hospitality and retail which often get high numbers of young people into employment for their first jobs/apprenticeships are in decline (massively) and the other traditional routeways such as construction, hair and beauty take too long in the route to competence and at a pay rate not much less than for qualified employees, combined with the need to have other members of staff supporting them with the onsite training and if under 18 having to be supervised at all times, the incentives against productivity have disappeared. Add to this that new emerging tech for young people to thrive in such as the AI and Social Media etc is not that easy to add to your list of provision due to DWP/DFE rules for new approvals and therefore ITPs can not look to offer standards appropriate to youth employment. It appears that reaction to the problem is to make things harder to solve it!

Featured jobs from FE Week jobs / Schools Week jobs

Browse more news