In our new report, Edge set out our concerns that, unless the growth and skills levy is carefully designed, greater flexibilities for businesses could squeeze funding for apprenticeship opportunities. As a result, the worrying decline of young people participating in apprenticeships, especially at entry levels, will continue.
There are always winners and losers when it comes to levy reform. However, there are currently no guardrails or pledges of additional money to ensure that the growth and skills levy will be invested in apprenticeships or young people.
Granted, the government has promised traineeships will be in scope. But without strong incentives, the apprenticeships that should follow might simply not be there.
Levy-paying employers are far less likely to hire young apprentices compared to SMEs. Since the apprenticeship levy’s introduction, the number of under-19s starting an apprenticeship has dropped by 37 per cent.
Looking at these trends over the past few years, it’s hard to comprehend how giving them more flexibility to spend this money on other skills training (in tandem, squeezing the pot available for SMEs) could result in more opportunities for young people.
Our report identifies that the growth and skills levy could also risk compromising achievement of other government policies and missions. The opportunity mission, aiming to break “the pernicious link between background and success”, hinges partly on delivering a ‘youth guarantee’. This promises every 18-to-21-year-old that they will have access to training, support to find work or, critically, an apprenticeship.
This is a hugely welcome pledge, given the number of young people not in education, employment and training has risen to 872,000.
Apprenticeships are the unrealised heart of the government’s growth mission. Bridget Phillipson said it best in a recent op-ed about the construction sector being the manpower that will deliver Labour’s promise to build 370,000 more homes/year: “to get Britain moving again, we also need skilled technicians […] But too few young people are pursuing these careers and it’s holding Britain back.”
All of these missions are potentially in jeopardy
Growth also means investing in our domestic workforce. Home secretary Yvette Cooper has singled out IT and engineering as her first areas of focus. As we highlight in our report, these two industries are crying out for more young apprentices.
An NHS Fit for the Future? Not without apprentices! A representative from NHS England warned us that allowing apprenticeship numbers to drop will seriously impact their ability to deliver the health service long-term workforce plan.
Make Britain a clean energy superpower? Sounds like we’ll need a few low-carbon heating technicians for that.
All of these missions are potentially in jeopardy unless the levy is carefully designed to protect apprenticeship opportunities for young people. As well as presenting the options at its disposal, in our report, we urge the government to use the many levers at its disposal to make a substantial difference to employers’ ability to use their levy to create more, lower-level opportunities for young people before jumping to – or at least, in conjunction with – flex of the levy.
This could include building on best-practice examples here and internationally to broker apprenticeships and support employers to understand their skills needs.
It might involve reforming the EPA and functional skills qualifications that are holding back apprenticeship completions.
And it should comprise streamlining the application and advertising of apprenticeships towards a meaningful one-stop shop, in the same way we have for university admissions. It’s not an easy fix, but a crucial one if we want to get serious about opportunity.
We also present a series of options available to the government and Skills England in considering the proportions of the levy that can be spent on non-apprenticeship skills training, the types of training courses that should be eligible for funding and who should benefit.
As Labour prepare for conference, they are right to focus on what businesses want. After all, they are the backbone of our economy. However, it is crucial to remember that they also depend on a skilled pipeline of new talent.
We will inevitably need to make short-term sacrifices to achieve long-term gain, but we now need the government to show courage in its own vision for change.
Read the full report, Flex Without Compromise: Preserving Apprenticeships for Young People Under a Growth and Skills Levy, here
Failing to impose strict controls on what training the incoming growth and skills levy can pay for would turn it into a “complete racket” for employers, a Labour peer has warned.
A report on the new government’s proposed reformed apprenticeship levy, released by the Edge Foundation today, looks at what “levers are left to pull” that would target the policy to benefit young people.
It warns that too much non-apprenticeship training could erode “already dwindling” apprenticeship opportunities especially at lower levels for those aged under 25.
But first, Labour urgently needs to “clearly articulate” what it hopes to achieve with levy reform to avoid damaging the apprenticeship “brand” – a task that has been handed to new quango Skills England.
Here are some key options the Edge Foundation suggests the government consider.
Limit the scope of non-apprenticeship spending
The charity has called on Skills England to put “tight guardrails” on what types of non-apprenticeship training levy funds can be spent on.
To ensure the training is “high quality”, the skills body should set “specified standards of quality, learner experience and outcomes”.
Labour peer and leading economist Lord Richard Layard, who wrote the foreword for the report and had his views featured throughout, tells the Edge Foundation adding too much flex would be a “complete racket”.
He adds: “What businesses want is to be able to use the apprenticeship levy to pay for things which they currently pay for themselves. It’s an absolute outrage.”
Prioritise ‘pre-apprenticeship’ style spending
Limiting levy flexibilities to pre-apprenticeship training would both promote apprenticeships to young people while conserving funding, the charity said.
Ahead of the general election, Labour pledged to set aside 3 per cent of the skills and growth levy for 150,000 traineeships.
But Edge Foundation urges the government to “learn lessons” from previous the previous traineeship scheme, scrapped by the government due to low take up.
Ringfence for certain groups
The government could add ringfences for certain groups, such as the young, or lower-level apprentices, to halt the trend of employers spending their levy on “more expensive, higher-level apprenticeships and/or on existing, older employees”.
But while this could be a “powerful driver” of employer behaviour, the charity acknowledges warnings from former skills Sir Michael Barber, who has argued that higher-level degree apprenticeships are good for social mobility and “integral” in improving apprenticeships’ prestige.
Flex %s with caution
Labour plans originally suggested employers would be able to spend up to 50 per cent of their levy allocation on non-apprenticeship training, but this threshold was notably absent in their 2024 general election manifesto.
The more recent language of “up to 50 per cent” suggests Labour has “listened to the uneasiness about such an arbitrary division”, Edge’s report said.
It states that most interviewees who participated in their research preferred a majority share for apprenticeships, with Policy Exchange, for example, suggesting ringfencing 75 per cent of the levy for apprenticeships.
Alternatively, employers could be required to “earn” their flexible allowance by first spending a set proportion, for example 50 per cent, of their levy fund on apprenticeships, the report added.
It said: “Proceeding with caution when it comes to setting the proportions of the growth and skills levy seems like a sensible approach – how much employers can spend on non-apprenticeship skills training can always be increased, but it is harder to remove flexibilities from the system.”
‘Treasury Margin’
One way to fund non-apprenticeship skills training without reducing the number of apprenticeships available could be to tap into the estimated £835 million ‘Treasury Margin’.
This is the gap between how much the levy generates in employer receipts verses how much the Treasury hands to the Department for Education and the devolved nations as their apprenticeship budget.
However, this option is “unlikely to be popular” at the Treasury, due to what the Edge Foundation calls a “lack of transparency and accountability”.
Extend levy to more businesses
Another way to raise money could be to extend the levy to all UK businesses, raising as much as £1.6 billion per year.
Currently, only businesses with an annual payroll of over £3 million pay 0.5 per cent of their payroll bill into the levy.
Increase small business apprenticeships
Key to more young people and lower-level apprenticeships is reversing the decline of starts in small businesses since 2017, the report argues.
To do this, the government should roll out financial incentives, building on other welcome recent steps such as removing the cap for small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and fully funding their training.
Address functional skills
The government should urgently look at the “suitability” of functional skills requirements, which many view as a “barrier to completion”.
Gill Mason, training academy director at Kids Planet, a learning provider and employer in early years, told the Edge Foundation: “It isn’t functional. It’s GCSE. It’s just what they’ve just left and come away from.
“It absolutely is the main reason our staff leave and don’t achieve is maths and English.”
Improve wages
Put apprenticeships on an “even keel” with other routes such as entry-level jobs and undergraduate degrees that have student loan support, the edge argues.
This would address surveys which have found that one-quarter of apprenticeship applicants didn’t pursue the careers route due to “affordability” concerns.
The Department for Education and Treasury have been approached for comment.
Team UK has scooped two silver and two bronze medals at this year’s WorldSkills competition in Lyon, France.
After four days of gruelling competition, Team UK were awarded four podium position medals at an electric ceremony this evening.
The UK also bagged 14 medallions of excellence across 12 skills.
Earlier this evening, family, friends, experts and officials descended on the OL Arena on the outskirts of Lyon to watch the 1,500 young people discover who came out on top as the world’s best in 62 skills competitions.
Solihull College alumni Harry Scolding won silver in joinery. He was tasked with building a working door over the course of four days.
Harry Scolding, joinery
He said: “I still haven’t come round to the fact that this has just happened.”
Scolding currently runs his own business HDS Joinery and said his customers had been “very supportive” with his training schedule in the last 6 weeks.
Scolding’s parents Katie and Lee, who own and run a hairdressing business, told FE Week earlier in the week that it is an “honour” being the parents of a WorldSkills UK champion.
“I’m not surprised that my son has got himself there, because he’s got a lot of determination and drive, and we’re just hoping he’s going to do really well in his competition,” Lee Scolding said.
Ruben Duggan, silver medallist, with training manager Ronnie Ferris
Ruben Duggan also won silver in the plumbing and heating. Duggan achieved the same feat in last year’s EuroSkills in Gdansk, Poland.
“When I came out of the bay, I was feeling a bit deflated. I didn’t think I’d put the best I’ve ever put into it, but I can’t think about it now. It’s absolutely brilliant.”
Duggan works for Powerserv LTD and trains at Coleg Y Cymoedd, Wales.
In the refrigeration and air conditioning skill, bronze was awarded Eastleigh College’s Luke Haile.
Haile, who works for Lightfoot Defence in Fareham, Hampshire, told FE Week that he has got “so much more” out of competing in and training for two and a half years for WorldSkills.
“I’d like to keep going onwards and upwards. It’s what WorldSkills has taught me is to keep pushing and see how far you go.”
David McKeown also won bronze for his skill in autobody repair. McKeown works at his family business James McKeown Accident Repair and trains at Riverpark Training in Northern Ireland.
McKeown told FE Week that his win felt “very surreal”.
“I went in with a really good head at the start of the competition,” he said. “The first two days were really good, the third day was hard.
“I realised how tight my competition was. China and Japan really made my job hard but fair play to them.”
The closing ceremony also presented the ‘Best in Nation’ award to Ruby Pile, Team UK’s restaurant service competitor.
Pile works at Lucknam Park Hotel and Spa and attended Cardiff and Vale College.
Medallions for excellence in 12 skills were also awarded for achieving the international standard benchmark.
Ben Blackledge, WorldSkills UK chief executive, said: “This is a fantastic result for the team and the UK as a whole. High quality skills development is crucial to growing the economy, and Team UK’s medal-winning performance in front of a global audience sends a strong message that the UK is a world-class place to invest, develop talent and create jobs.”
See the full table of winners here:
WorldSkills 2024 UK results
Medal
Skill
Name
Training provider
Silver
Joinery
Harry Scolding
Solihull College and University Centre
Silver
Plumbing and heating
Ruben Duggan
Coleg Y Cymoedd
Bronze
Refrigeration and air conditioning
Luke Haile
Eastleigh College
Bronze
Autobody repair
David McKeown
Riverpark Training
Medallion for Excellence
Mechatronics
Lucy Yelland and Ben Love
Tameside College
Medallion for Excellence
Mechanical engineering CAD
Nathan Young
New College Lanarkshire
Medallion for Excellence
Web technologies
Mark Kiss
United Colleges Group
Medallion for Excellence
Electrical installation
Daniel Knox
South West College
Medallion for Excellence
Painting and decorating
Dior Regan
Lincoln College
Medallion for Excellence
Cabinet making
Isaac Bingham
Southern Regional College
Medallion for Excellence
Hairdressing
Charlotte Lloyd
Reds Hair Company
Medallion for Excellence
Cooking
Oska Ready
DN Colleges Group
Medallion for Excellence
Car painting
Miguel Harvey
Steer Automotive Group
Medallion for Excellence
IT network systems administration
Finley Graham
City of Glasgow College / Glasgow Caledonian University
Medallion for Excellence
Digital construction
Isabelle Barron
Sheffield Hallam University
Medallion for Excellence
Robot systems integration
Jason Scott & Charlie Carson
Northern Regional College & Northern Regional College / University of Ulster
After four days of intensive competitions, all eyes are now on Sunday evening’s WorldSkills 2024 closing ceremony.
Among thousands of international visitors and spectators, this year’s troupe of 1,400 competitors from 69 competing countries and regions will finally find out if they’ve done enough to place themselves and their countries on the medal table.
Proceedings will begin 6.30pm, streamed live below, with a brief programme of remarks from WorldSkills dignitaries.
Then, skill by skill, the highest-scoring competitors will be announced as gold, silver and bronze medallists.
One top competitor will be named the recipient of the prestigious Albert Vidal Award, which goes to the champion who received the highest score of the entire competition. The UK last won the Albert Vidal Award in 2015.
We also expect a spectacular performance from WorldSkills Shanghai, marking the official handover from Lyon for WorldSkills 2026.
Richard Alberg is flying high, and not just because his company, Aptem, is catapulting apprenticeships into the AI age via its software. He’s flying in a literal sense with his commute to work, piloting his small plane from his Channel Islands home – where he can “wake up and see the sea” – to board meetings in London.
Alberg says he has always sought to capitalise on the latest technological advances in his entrepreneurial endeavours. He co-founded Corndel in 2017 as a means of providing Aptem with its first training provider customer – not knowing it would become one of the highest-earning providers in the apprenticeships levy market.
Richard Alberg in the small plane that he flies
Jaw-dropping moment
He glimpsed a vision of the future shaped by AI two years ago during a demonstration of how ChatGPT could be used in Microsoft Office, which made Alberg realise what a game-changer generative AI could be for the apprenticeships market.
Until then, ChatGPT had been just a “party trick” for Alberg who would enjoy impressing friends by prompting it to create lyrics in Shakespearean style. But Microsoft’s demonstration revealed the potential for large language models to be embedded into third-party apps handling their own databases, opening the drawbridge for technology companies such as Aptem.
Alberg says he is “not someone who gets shocked that easily”. But his “jaw dropped to the ground” as he realised that “everything would change” with this development. The next day he set about reimagining his company.
Aptem’s commercial projects, which involved creating compliance solutions for training providers, were shelved as teams were redeployed onto new generative AI work.
Alberg suffered kickback from colleagues for the sudden direction change but remained convinced the technology would “profoundly change apprenticeship training”.
The economic argument for this is “compelling”, he says. Alberg believes many of his clients pay tutors around £50,000 a year but 20 per cent of tutor time “could be better utilised” by enabling a chatbot to answer generic questions from learners or help with marking assignments.
Alberg claims this saving could represent a 12 per cent extra margin for a provider with 100 tutors just by using AI moderately” for “mundane” tasks.
Meanwhile, tutors can focus on what they can do “far better than computers – pastoral care”.
Entrepreneurial spark
Alberg was determined to strike his own path in life from a young age. His Italian mother taught languages to opera singers as a professor at the Royal Academy of Music and Royal College of Music, but Alberg did not share her musical talents. The most creative he got with his guitar was “hitting my sister with it”, he tells me. He confesses to loving opera but “pretends not to” when talking to his mother.
Richard Alberg and his mum
Alberg’s lawyer father died when he was 12 after a four-year illness which resulted in him becoming “quite rebellious”.
He was already writing computer software to do his maths homework (to get “one up on the system”) and was moved up a school year to reflect his capabilities. But he then stubbornly chose not to go to university, a decision he came to regret when carving a career in the education and skills sector.
Alberg’s impressive self-confidence meant he bagged a graduate trainee job at an advertising agency where he came to love the buzz of the 1980s London advertising world. Although work days were long, so too were the lunches – and the parties.
At the tender age of 21 he set up his own agency, RDA Marketing Services, which clinched an “unglamorous” contract with Alan Sugar’s pioneering computer company Amstrad to expand its dealer marketing.
But Alberg admits he “wasn’t very good at working” with his two business partners, and sold out to them after getting “bored” and wanting something “new and different”.
‘Living on ether’
He found that opportunity after seeing a feature about computerised psychometric testing on BBC TV show Tomorrow’s World. He contacted the person behind the concept and set up a new company, Psychometric Services Ltd, with distribution rights for what became known as the ‘Eysenck Personality Profiler’ (EPP).
Richard Alberg early in his career
Alberg quickly realised it “wasn’t a great product”, but because his firm was merely the distributor he had “very little control” to improve it.
So he hired his own psychometricians and technologists and repositioned his company to develop its own psychometric profiling tools instead. It became one of the country’s biggest psychometric testing firms and sold its services to employers including UBS, Cadbury, BP and Royal Mail to use for recruitment and staff development.
But with success came “challenging” times too when the company was “living on ether”, as much of the income was tied up in the business. While everyone around him assured Alberg the company would “do brilliantly”, he was worried about meeting the next staff payroll.
Alberg had around 45 employees and could only grow his operation further by expanding internationally, which he was reluctant to do. Instead he sold up in 2006 to an American company, Kenexa, for “not so much money” – around £7 million – enough to pay off his mortgage. This brought “some security” to Alberg’s family, which he says “mattered a lot”.
With the 2008 financial crisis came job losses, which provided Alberg’s next opportunity – establishing an online job-seeking platform for the unemployed. His new company, My Work Search, did “exceptionally well commercially” while unemployment was “high and increasing”. It evolved to support the organisations providing assistance to the unemployed which opened Alberg’s eyes to the skills sector.
Whim of civil servants
In 2015 he became a governor at North Hertfordshire College, which gave Alberg an insight into how colleges operated.
Richard Alberg running his first marathon at the age of 42
He tells me that within a fortnight “some shenanigans emerged” involving significant misreporting. It led to the rest of the board being “encouraged to step down” amid “quite significant financial challenges”. Alberg was compelled to become the new chair, which was “so not the plan” for the busy entrepreneur.
Funding needed to be returned to the Education and Skills Funding Agency, and Alberg’s board “had to use every favour we could pull to try to have the ESFA allow us a certain amount of time before the money came back… you’re at the whim of a civil servant who can make life very difficult.”
The college’s 2017-18 accounts later revealed a £5 million deficit, 20 times higher than was budgeted for at the beginning of the year. It included a £4.3 million overspend compared to income and a £713,000 loss on the sale of a property.
Alberg blames some of the college’s woes on its decision to open a college in Saudi Arabia. North Herts was part of the College of Excellence programme, founded in 2013, to boost technical and vocational training in the kingdom through partnerships with international providers.
Alberg tells me the college’s contract with the Saudis was “so one-sided” and claims it “could have brought the college down”.
“Naive colleges go into sectors they’re ill equipped to be effective in and we could have gone bust on the back of our exposure to Saudi,” he says.
North Herts became one of many colleges to exit the Saudi market. FE Week analysis in June found that only seven colleges still had an overseas campus in 2022-23.
But despite all these challenges, Alberg “really got a kick” out of his two years as chair and says the experience he gleaned helped him in his own business endeavours.
“We were on the side of the angels who were doing good work.”
Becoming Aptem
As the economy bounced back and unemployment fell, Alberg again re-pivoted his company into Aptem, providing an end-to-end platform for the vocational training market. But there was a snag. Although providers expressed enthusiasm for the concept of a platform integrating learning management systems, e-portfolios, funding systems and CRM systems in one place, they were reluctant to be the first to pilot the endeavour.
Alberg’s solution was to set up a training company, Corndel (along with Sean Williams, a non-executive on his board) to act as Aptem’s first customer – just in time for the launch of the apprenticeships levy. Within three years Corndel had a revenue of £20 million and 250 staff.
Richard Alberg on his boat
Alberg puts its success down to having “no legacy”, enabling him to “design a company around what we felt the customer, the employer and the learner would find most valuable”.
Corndel decided to woo employers by spending “a fortune – hundreds of thousands” on curriculums, whereas their competitors would often rely on “the free stuff that an awarding body was willing to give them”.
They also paid “almost double” the going rate for tutors (£65,000 a year compared to £30,000 elsewhere), who they branded “professional development executives”.
They placed an “absolute focus on quality learner experience… treating the service as though it was an expensive, paid learning journey”. The fact it was paid for via the levy was “just incidental and a bonus”.
Alberg exited Corndel in 2020 when it was sold to investment group THI, but still regards it as his “baby, even if it feels fully grown up”. He remains “so proud of everything Corndel has achieved and is achieving”.
King Canute
Nowadays, Alberg works as a consultant for the education and training recruitment agency Protocol and behavioural finance firm Oxford Risk, having been a non-executive director for the firms prior to his move to Guernsey last year.
Aptem is now, he says, the largest technology vendor to the apprenticeships sector with 120 staff and 200 customers, the biggest being Lifetime Training. Alberg believes a “wonderful characteristic” of AI is that if Aptem makes an improvement next week, then every one of its 130,000 learners can benefit from it at the same time.
But he is also not blind to the downsides of the technology – how AI will erode the “entry-level skills” required for employees to become more accomplished at their work.
He draws parallels between the potential predicament of tech experts like himself and that of King Canute, who tried to show his courtiers he could not command the tides but whose message was misinterpreted by future generations. Like the tide, he sees AI technology as “inexorable”, and to think otherwise is “naïve”.
But in raising the potential downsides, “people in my position don’t want to get shot as a messenger. I have a commercial hat on… so you sometimes feel you have to sit on your hands a little bit”.
On the more positive side, Alberg says Aptem has “done a lot of testing” and found that ‘hallucinations’ (where chatbots create false information) have not yet emerged when data from the training sector is being interpreted by the chatbot.
Controversially, he believes that AI offers advantages over human support in terms of its reliability, because AI “doesn’t get bored of you” or “say, ‘I’ve got another call in five minutes, I’ve got to get off the line”.
He says: “Like Canute, I can’t change the tide. What I can do is say, ‘we’ll make this tool work as well as we can’.
As I write this, I’m on my way home from Liverpool. Every part of my trip has been digital, from train tickets to card payment-only hotels to booking taxi journeys around the city. So when we hear that digital skills are lacking, it is hard not to be sceptical. And yet.
Despite our pervasive familiarity with devices, there remain millions of people across the UK who don’t have the skills to get by. From older people who long for when they could visit their bank branch to those who struggle to navigate online forms, people are increasingly being disadvantaged by the modern world.
Our third core skill
Being digitally savvy allows us to access the best deals for shopping and utility bills. It opens the door to more lucrative jobs. It brings us greater awareness on health matters and it even broadens our social circles. And not being digitally savvy increasingly means missing out on all of that.
This is why digital skills are becoming the third core skill alongside English and maths. Indeed, way back in 2015 the House of Lords Select Committee on Digital Skills stated children should be taught “digital literacy” as a core skill.
The report also highlighted that universities should ensure all graduates are “digitally competent” and apprenticeships should have greater emphasis on digital skills. It was written pre-lockdown, and with many routes now having a significant online element, it’s even more vital.
Rightly, English and maths are held up as crucial to social mobility. Increasingly, the same can be said of digital skills. Every learner simply must have a grasp of more than the basics.
The new normal
As digital becomes normalised, colleges and apprenticeship providers are adapting by assessing the skills needs of their learners at the beginning of their journey. This ensures they can be supported and able to access their course and resources.
However, the misconception persists that digital skills are an older person’s need, that younger people – on their phone all the time and online 24/7 – are ‘digital natives’. This not the case at all. Younger people may be more advanced in certain areas of digital devices, but this doesn’t mean they have the full skills to operate safely and effectively in the digital world.
When the Department for Education brought in the new basic digital skills standards, they created two qualifications: essential digital skills and digital functional skills. One is focused on digital skills for life, and the other for education and work. Though they both cover similar content, the key is in the detail.
More and more learning encompasses digital tools or platforms. But while this increases personalised learning and accessibility, it can also paradoxically create barriers for those without the required skills or tools.
I frequently hear about learners not engaging with resources or doing poorly in online assessments. Often, lack of subject knowledge is not the cause but poor digital skills blocking learners’ ability to engage with these platforms.
In fact, Ofqual recently highlighted in their functional skills review that learners being forced to take online assessments rather than paper-based ones was one of the reasons some were unsuccessful in their attempts to achieve their qualification.
No one left offline
In life, education and work, digital skills are the key to an improved way of living. However, we must resist the temptation to jump to artificial intelligence or augmented reality as the solution for all the world’s ills.
First and foremost, we must consider end users and whether they’re actually skilled enough to use them.
Digital skills are on every Local Skills Improvement Plan as a high need. If we’re going to meet those needs, then – in the same way as we must overcome ‘maths anxiety’ and ‘anti-maths attitudes’ – we must be brave enough to admit our digital skills are not where we need them to be as a nation.
And that means doing everything we can to bring everyone on board.
To learn more about NCFE’s No One Left Offline campaign, click here
The National Police Chiefs’ Council has declared violence against women a national emergency in England and Wales, describing it as an “epidemic” and a “national threat to public safety”. This comes as online and offline misogyny increasingly infiltrate our classrooms. So what can we do about it?
The matter is clearly urgent. The first-ever Violence Against Women and Girls (VAWG) national policing statement reveals the staggering reality that an estimated 2 million women have fallen victim to offences such as stalking, harassment, sexual assault and domestic abuse.
Meanwhile, an estimated 10 per cent of all violence against women and girls occurs online. (It is likely much more, due to current recording practices).
Sexism behind the screen
FE Week readers will no doubt be familiar with Andrew Tate, who affirms that he is “absolutely a misogynist”, calls women “intrinsically lazy” and claims there is “no such thing as an independent female”.
UK authorities have singled him out for his role in spreading misogyny among boys and young men, but ‘influencers’ like him are just one of the causes of this online radicalisation of men.
The rise of the incel subculture has become an echo chamber where individuals blame their problems on women, promote hateful ideology and even encourage violence and terrorism. A small but growing number of violent attacks are attributed to this group.
Infiltrating classrooms
As smartphone usage rises, young people are exposed to damaging beliefs and behaviours earlier than ever. These formative experiences can have a lasting effect on their later adolescence and – if unchallenged – their adulthood.
Educators are already observing a shift. According to research from Feminista, 64 per cent of teachers hear misogynistic language weekly, and the issue extends beyond verbal harassment. Almost one in three teachers witness sexual harassment on at least a weekly basis.
While the research focuses on secondary schools, this alarming trend continues to further and higher education. Government inquiries reveal that sexist and misogynistic behaviours tend to intensify and manifest in more severe forms later, resulting in an increase in incidents of sexual harassment, assault and gender-based discrimination at colleges (and universities).
For all these reasons, we must address these issues early. School age would be best, but further education institutions can and must prevent the normalisation of such behaviours.
Newcastle College has received national attention for its efforts to combat sexism and misogyny among young people, appearing on BBC radio to explain the specialist training our staff receive on these issues and how we work collaboratively to tackle them. Here’s what every college should be doing.
Safe learning environments
Schools and colleges should be safe spaces where all students can learn and thrive without fear of harassment or discrimination.
We have adopted a zero-tolerance policy towards inappropriate behaviour, creating an environment where those who are targeted feel safe to come forward and report perpetrators. Then, we intervene.
Teacher training and support
Providing teachers with the necessary training and support to recognise and challenge sexism and misogyny can have a significant impact.
We have enlisted the support of external organisations including Beyond Equality to tutor students and staff alike about the dangers of sexism and misogyny, and many of our staff members have completed ‘active bystander’ training.
Comprehensive sex education
Conversations about consent, respect and healthy relationships happen in primary and secondary schools, so these are not new topics to our learners. But we cannot afford to cede ground in FE, at an age when they are gaining more access to external influences and are more likely to act.
We do this largely through tutorials exploring these issues as hot topics that allow our trained tutors to encourage debate and critical thinking.
Parental and community involvement
Addressing misogyny in education settings requires a collaborative effort involving parents, educators, and the wider community. Encouraging open conversations about gender equality at home and within the community can reinforce the values we aim to impart.
Misogyny may be on the rise online, but our most influential relationships remain those we have offline. By equipping educators and parents with the tools they need, we can mitigate the spread of this harmful ideology and ensure gender equality remains the aspiration of future generations.
A new chapter in recognising the best in the UK’s apprenticeship sector is set to begin as the Apprenticeship and Training Awards (ATAs) 2025 has officially launched.
The event, formerly known as the AAC Apprenticeship Awards, is a prestigious celebration of excellence of both apprenticeship employers and training providers across the country.
Nominations for the awards opened today, and the panel expects to review hundreds of applications before the November submissions deadline.
Since their inception in 2018, the awards have attracted thousands of nominations from leading employer and training providers, with twenty one winners recognised last year.
Judging panel chair and EducationScape CEO Shane Mann: “The inaugural event in 2018 saw over 350 nominations – since then the awards have continued to grow in size, scope, and significance.
“Each year, the awards have shone a spotlight on the employers, training providers, and individuals who are making a tangible impact on the sector.”
“Alongside our repositioning of the conference, the Annual Apprenticeship Conference to the Apprenticeships and Training Conference, I am excited that the ATAs will provide an opportunity to celebrate outstanding provision across apprenticeships and training”.
This year’s awards promise to be the most competitive yet, with the introduction of new categories and the ever-increasing quality of apprenticeship programmes across the country.
From 2025 the awards will include a fresh set of categories that reflect the broader needs of the workforce, including recognition for excellence in English and Maths skills development, sustainability in training, and partnerships with employers.
They will also feature an open nomination process for the special recognition award, which will honour an individual who has made a lasting contribution to the apprenticeship and training sector at a national level.
While continuing to celebrate those who are shaping the future of apprenticeships, the revamped categories will showcase the sector’s growing focus on sustainability, diversity, and innovation.
The ATAs form part of the Apprenticeships and Training Conference (ATC), formerly the Annual Apprenticeship Conference, first launched by FE Week’s publisher EducationScape six years ago.
The Association of Employment and Learning Providers (AELP) continues to be a conference partner alongside FE Week, while City & Guilds has renewed its partnership of the awards for another three years.
AELP CEO Ben Rowland said the association is “really excited” about the evolution of the awards and conference.
He added: “It is really important that as a sector we put more of a spotlight on the amazing work that AELP members and others in the sector to above and beyond apprenticeships, central as they are to the skills agenda.
“While apprenticeships often grab the headlines, the work that is done by all sorts of providers – not just colleges – on 16-19 study programmes, bootcamps, adult skills programmes, multiply and many others, is often the thing that makes all the difference to individuals and their employers.
“I’m looking forward to seeing as many people as possible in Liverpool in just six month’s time!”
Nominations open today, and the closing date for submissions is 23:59 on November 14, 2024.
The judging panel, chaired by Shane Mann and Ben Rowland, will review hundreds of applications from employers and training providers that lead the way in skills development.
Winners will be announced at the ATA Gala Dinner on Tuesday, March 11, 2025, following a Parliamentary reception for finalists in early February. For more information on how to submit your nomination and the full list of award categories, visit the Apprenticeship and Training Awards website.
In challenging times, we must have the courage to think differently. The UK’s skills gap has been giving British businesses a headache for some time now; we will need to call on different approaches to solve it. Apprenticeships have a crucial role to play, as does the sports sector.
If we zoom out and look at things globally, the view is pretty gloomy. Over the next decade, across the G20 countries, £11.5 trillion of potential economic output could go unrealised if we fail to address the skills deficit.
On top of this, rapid technological advancements and ever-changing net zero requirements mean that skills can become redundant fast. For some skills, it only takes 24 months for the world to have moved on without them.
Here in the UK, things aren’t much brighter, with three out of four companies struggling to find the talent they need. UK training budgets have shrunk by 26 per cent since 2007, reducing the UK’s per-head investment to the lowest in Europe.
All in all, the issue is pretty acute. We’re at a crossroads: we can shake up our approach or carry on with the same strategy that has not taken us very far.
It’s not all doom and gloom, though. The government, with their unveiling of the Skills England Bill, are assembling a taskforce to close the gap. The initiative also includes reforms to the apprenticeship levy and will free up funding so that it can be used more flexibly.
I wholeheartedly support any plans to boost apprenticeships; they will be crucial in fixing the skills gap. And they don’t just benefit businesses but communities up and down the country, too. They empower young people, regardless of background, and are a lever for reducing inequalities across society.
I want to see Skills England succeed. But it will need a properly considered mandate and the right leadership to deliver a cohesive national skills strategy and pave the way for a 21st-century workforce.
The time for policy revisions is behind us. It’s crunch time
Beyond this, Skills England will need to prioritise action. The time for revision after revision of policies is behind us. It’s crunch time. We need well-delivered, tangible solutions to fix the skills gap.
The sports industry undoubtedly has a role to play in this. Sports businesses are societal stakeholders; they know how to bring communities along with them on the road to success.
Having worked in the sports sector for decades, I may be biased. But don’t just take my word for it. The example from South Devon College in these pages earlier this year shows how deep the community impact of marrying sports and skills can go, and it is far beyond the pitch.
I’ve seen it through my own company, too. I have been fortunate to work with some of the most exciting sports brands, helping them to maximise the apprenticeship levy and deliver social impact. When sports businesses open up job opportunities and bring on young talent, they have an astounding effect on the local community.
At their core, sports organisations know how to combine business objectives with community impact; this could be a powerful tool for Skills England.
Sport has long been a cultural cornerstone in Britain, deeply woven into the fabric of our communities. You can’t witness the energy outside your local sports ground on matchday and tell me that sport doesn’t have a unique power to unite. Even more importantly, sports organisations are close to the people they serve; they know their challenges and aspirations.
Skills England must reframe the debate around skills so that they are seen as a pillar of economic growth. Every single stakeholder needs energising; we must inject passion into the topic.
And passion is one thing that’s never in short supply at sports organisations. With its unifying power and extensive local reach, sport can play a vital role in this effort.
We need innovative thinking to fix our skills gap. Skills England could have long-term, locally relevant impact. But if it wants to turn up the dial and multiply its power to affect change, it should bring sports organisations on board.