Festival of Learning award winners named

A refugee who fled Afghanistan alone at the age of 16 has been crowned ‘outstanding individual learner’ at this year’s Festival of Learning awards.

The Royal Society of Arts in London will be the setting for today’s prestigious awards ceremony at which nine learners, employers and training providers will be singled out for their “inspirational” lifelong-learning stories.

Among them will be Habib Rezaie (pictured above), who arrived in the UK as an unaccompanied asylum-seeker 10 years ago.

He was taken into care by Leicester City Council, and didn’t speak a word of English because he had not attended school in his home country.

Judges pointed out that Mr Rezaie was forced to work long hours to catch up with his peers – but his hard work paid off and he earned a place on Leicester College’s ICT course.

After that, he eventually achieved a 2:1 in his degree in business computing at De Montfort University.

Alongside his studies, Mr Rezaie volunteers at After18, a Leicester charity which supports unaccompanied asylum seeking children and young people.

“Education is the most important thing in my life as it gives me hope for the future and allows me to make a positive contribution to my community,” he said.

The Festival of Learning, led by the Learning and Work Institute with support from the NOCN, is now in its 25th year.

Jonathan Beebee will be presented with this year’s ‘learning for work award’.

He sustained a severe head injury at 19, and was told he would never fully recover. But defying the doctors’ verdict, he pushed on and enrolled into the Lloyds Bank Social Entrepreneurs programme at the School for Social Entrepreneurs in Hampshire.

Twenty years on he runs a social enterprise called PBS4, which supports people with learning disabilities.

Mark Goodwin will meanwhile receive the ‘social impact award’.

Judges claimed his “determination” to include all types of learners in his sports classes led him to establish England’s first mixed-ability rugby team, and inspire many more across the country.

Under the inclusive model, players with learning difficulties and physical disabilities play full-contact rugby alongside their able-bodied peers.

The ‘project award’ goes to Refresh 2 Impress, a bespoke three-day course designed by South Gloucestershire and Stroud College “tailored for learners over 50 years of age”.

More than 300 adults have benefited from the opportunities this learning presents, according to the judges.

Sabeena Shah will pick up this year’s ‘tutor award’.

The judges said that when growing up, Sabeena was “not encouraged to study, let alone think about teaching”, but when she graduated with a law degree in 2011, she decided to teach students facing similar challenges.

Sabeena now manages and teaches the access to law level three qualification at Barking and Dagenham College.

Taylor Bird will be given the ‘young adult learner’ award.

Bullied at school due to learning and physical disabilities, she left with very few GCSEs. But she “flourished” at Walsall College and worked hard to complete entry-level English and maths qualifications as well as level two and three art and design.

She won a place on a photography degree and has now set up her own photography business with plans to expand into her own studio.

Picking up the ‘employer award’ will be James Electrics Contracting, which works closely with local training providers in Devon to offer “high-quality work experience opportunities for learners”.

It offers training to nine apprentices, trainees or work-based learners each year.

Talk English, a project which helps people with poor English skills improve their spoken and written communication and become more involved in the community, will be handed the ‘president’s award’.

And Stephen Bush will be honoured with the ‘patron’s award’ after he took early retirement from a long career in social services to become his mother’s carer.

He is now a “passionate advocate of adult learning, believing it can play an instrumental role in staving off dementia”.

Anne Milton, the skills minister for skills, said it was “such a pleasure to be able to congratulate this year’s Festival of Learning award winners”.

Stephen Evans, the chief executive of the Learning and Work Institute, added: “I congratulate every one of this year’s winners, and indeed everyone who was nominated.”

AELP calls on government to fund level two apprenticeships in full

Level two apprenticeships should be fully funded by the government at every age group, the AELP has said.

This bold but uncosted recommendation is part of a “major” policy submission discussing the way the apprenticeship reforms are “undermining” the prime minister’s social mobility agenda.

If actioned, it would mean the government was paying for around 70 per cent of apprenticeships.

The AELP also wants 16- to 18-year-old apprentices to receive full funding regardless of level.

To offset this cost, the body wants the government to “raise the employer co-investment on a new sliding scale”.

This would start “with 10 per cent at level three, 20 per cent at level four, 30 per cent at level five, 40 per cent at level six and 50 per cent at level seven apprenticeships for apprentices over the age of 19”.

But in an exclusive interview with FE Week, the AELP’s boss Mark Dawe admitted his association had not fully costed the policy.

“We haven’t done a detailed costing because we haven’t got all of the data to hand but we do know that level twos were fully funded in the sense that there was no employer contribution,” he said.

“Now obviously funding rates have changed so it needs to be run through again and I think the whole point of what we’re saying is that at the higher levels there are clear benefits to the employee and the employer and the real focus needs to be on those first steps at level two.”

Pressed on whether the recommendation would undo the government’s attempts to introduce employer contributions, Mr Dawe admitted it would, “but only for level two”, which he admitted made up a “significant” number of all apprenticeships.

It is too early to simply reintroduce full funding for all apprenticeships

It is also meanwhile “up for debate” as to how the full funding would be rationed at level two, for example by going back to an allocations based model.

He confessed he had not consulted with his members on the policy as it was an “early proposition” for debate.

The plan has not been met with great support from the FE sector’s other top association boss.

“The report raises some important issues which are worth following up, but it is too early to simply reintroduce full funding for all small employers and all apprenticeships,” said David Hughes, the chief executive of the Association of Colleges.

“That’s just one of the many changes to the apprenticeship programme in the last year and it is important that the government monitors and discusses the overall impact of those changes,” he said.

Beyond this proposal, AELP’s paper raises 14 other points it believes the government needs to address in its apprenticeships reforms in order to remove the “obstacles” to social mobility.

For instance, the AELP contends that “the rigid implementation” for 20 per cent off-the-job training is “reducing our recruitment of level two apprentices”, and that the training time for maths and English which is required “in addition” places “the heaviest burden on employers”.

Levy-paying employers are meanwhile “prioritising existing employees for apprenticeships instead of recruiting new entrants and giving young people an opportunity, further restricting opportunities for young people”.

“The message came out from Downing Street over the summer that social mobility was still the number one priority for the government after securing a good deal for Brexit,” Mr Dawe writes.

“Education ministers therefore need to get a firm grip on the apprenticeship reforms to stop a potential haemorrhaging of young talent missing out on opportunities that employers were previously willing to offer.”

Read AELP’s full paper here.

Movers and Shakers: Edition 218

Your weekly guide to who’s new and who’s leaving

Mike Kilbride, Principal, Birkenhead Sixth Form College

Start date: September 2017
Previous job: Deputy principal at Birkenhead Sixth Form College
Interesting fact: Mike has been a Burnley FC season ticket holder for 40 years.

____________________________________________

Jo Maher, Principal, Boston College

Start date: September 2017
Previous job: Assistant principal at Reaseheath College
Interesting fact: Jo worked as a lifeguard for a number of years, and she once had to be on duty at 5am every morning for the British Olympic Team during their training for Beijing 2008.

____________________________________________

Stephen Howlett, Chair, London South East Colleges

Start date: August 2017
Previous job: CEO at Peabody
Interesting fact: Stephen has lived in the Greenwich area in London for over four decades.

____________________________________________

John Morrison, Principal, Lincoln UTC

Start date: December 2017
Previous job: Headteacher of Swindon Academy 
Interesting fact: Alongside his 20 years of teaching experience, John has also worked as an advertising executive, biochemist, carpenter and furniture designer.

____________________________________________

Chris White, President, Warwickshire College Group

Start date: September 2017
Previous job: MP for Warwick and Leamington
Interesting fact: During his time as an MP, Chris was co-chair of the all-party parliamentary group on video games. 

 

If you want to let us know of any new faces at the top of your college, training provider or awarding organisation please let us know by emailing news@feweek.co.uk

Corbyn speaking at AoC annual conference

Jeremy Corbyn will address this year’s Association of Colleges annual conference.

The annual event at at the ICC in Birmingham is one of the key events in the FE calendar, and takes place this year from November 14 to 15, and the resurgent Labour leader is one of the headline speakers.

Other highlights announced include Ofsted chief inspector Amanda Spielman, and writer and broadcaster Matthew Syed.

Amanda Spielman

“It is great news that we have the leader of the opposition coming to speak to delegates for the first time,” said David Hughes, the chief executive of the AoC.

“It’s another important recognition of the crucial roles which colleges play, for the economy, for communities, families, young people and adults.

“Colleges remain at the heart of their local communities and the national economy – that’s why the theme of the conference is colleges mean business.”

Delegates will also have the opportunity for in-depth discussions on the key issues of the day, including apprenticeships, curriculum reforms and T-levels.

The winners of AoC’s prestigious Beacon and Student of the Year Award will also be announced.

FE Week will be the premier media partner, and we will, as ever, report live from the event throughout, and produce a paper from our hotel suite on-site.

Booking is open for the conference, with information available at http://www.aocannualconference.co.uk/.

AoC boss expresses regret over 1 per cent pay offer

The Association of Colleges has expressed regret for offering staff a one-per-cent payrise – and has come in for heavy criticism from the unions for its trouble.

“We wish we were in a position to make a better recommendation today, but current funding levels for colleges do not allow us to do so,” claimed AoC boss David Hughes.

“We will work closely with the unions in the coming months to campaign for fair funding for colleges and address the under investment which the sector has faced for too long.”

The National Joint Forum, made up of the unions representing college staff, submitted a claim for an across-the-board rise of around 6 per cent in April.

But the final offer made by the AoC, which represents college leaders, was just one per cent, or the sum of £250 “where this is more beneficial”.

Mr Hughes insisted that the AoC shared the views of the unions that a skilled and well rewarded workforce is critical to the future success of FE.

“A major part of the AoC case for better funding to government is to allow the reward packages colleges can offer to be competitive,” said Mr Hughes.

“Every college wants to attract and retain the best people, but it is clear that cuts to FE funding over the last decade have disproportionately hit colleges, impacting directly on their ability to reward staff.”

As part of the pay offer, the AoC has agreed to campaign with the FE unions to “close the gap with schools and address the fundamental recruitment and retention challenges in the sector”.

He also wants to meet unions again in January to review any wider developments on public sector pay and the “funding position of the sector at that time”.

Police and prison officers learned earlier this month that they would will this year receive a pay rise above the one-per-cent cap imposed on the rest of the public sector.

An AoC spokesperson told FE Week its own one-per-cent offer was made independently of the cap, which doesn’t cover colleges’ pay, and that it had been forced to focus on “affordability within a tough funding environment for colleges”.

Unison’s head of education, Jon Richards, described the offer as “hugely disappointing”.

“It will do little to lift workers out of debt and poverty, particularly as colleges are under no obligation to implement it,” he said.

“Many college employees have had to take on second jobs or borrow money from family or friends as they struggle to pay their bills.

“Colleges know good salaries are vital to attract and retain staff. But if the government continues to underfund further education, workers will seek employment elsewhere.”

Earlier this month, UCU wrote to principals of FE colleges urging them to instruct their negotiators to make an acceptable offer at yesterday’s pay talks.

“Members will be extremely disappointed that once again the employer offer of one per cent is substantially below inflation and fails to address the years of pay suppression which FE staff have endured,” claimed its head of further education, Andrew Harden.

“Although the pledge to campaign with joint trade unions for more investment in the sector is welcome and necessary, it does not ease the immediate hardship faced by many dedicated staff.

“There is now clear agreement on both sides that pay in FE is a problem, but the real question for the sector is what we are going to do about it.”

ETF tenders new FE training programme for future CEOs

Half a million pounds is on offer to run a new leadership training programme for senior FE managers looking to step up to top jobs.

The Education and Training Foundation put a tender out three days ago, and it’s on the hunt for a provider with “an excellent track record” in executive leadership to develop a project it is calling ‘Preparing for the CEO role in the further education and training sector’.

It’s the latest entry to a suite of new FE leadership training programmes the ETF operates, and will initially run for four months between November 6 and March 10 next year.

The details of the tender, seen by FE Week, state that applicants should “normally be designated second-tier managers” with a minimum of two years in post.

They must also be “ready to step up to the CEO role”, something that needs “a recommendation for the programme by their principal/CEO and chair of the board”.

The ETF aims to deliver training to at least 50 delegates.

“We expect an initial cohort of 25 minimum to complete the programme and a further cohort of 25 minimum to begin the programme before 10 March 2018 and reserve the right to extend the contract for a period of up to and including a third financial year,” it said.

The project spend could end up paying around £10,000 per trainee if the minimum recruitment target is met.

The exact contents are up for negotiation, but it is expected to take the form of two or three-day residential courses “with structured, supported learning activity between”.

Costs for the course will be “partly subsidised” by the ETF, a spokesperson for the foundation told FE Week, but the tender documents reveal that the delegate fee “will be set at £3,000 each with no discount options”.

In March, the foundation announced a leadership programme for existing principals and chief executives, backed by £1.27 million of government cash.

Frank McLoughlin

The project, headed by the ETF’s associate director for leadership, Sir Frank McLoughlin, was designed to boost the capacity of individual principals and chief executives, and got underway in June.

A programme to help chief finance officers become commercial leaders, backed with another £500,000 in funding, was also launched this year.

These are understood to be the first new leadership programmes specifically for the FE and skills sector since the demise of the former Learning and Skills Improvement Service in 2013.

LSIS, which emerged from the former Centre of Excellence for Leadership, ran a number of programmes for FE leaders including a senior leadership and management development programme and a programme for new principals.

The spokesperson told FE Week that the new aspiring principals project is “aimed at helping to build and create a pipeline of senior leaders for the future”, in an area the foundation “has been asked by many in the sector to play a part in”.

Tenders will be evaluated by an ETF panel, which will “judge past performance on the evidence provided of impact both on the individual and the organisation, reputation for excellence in design and delivery of executive training, and the ability to work flexibility with clients to meet their needs”.

While the project is expected to end in March, the ETF said that, subject to the availability of funding, it would “like to include a right to extend any contract for up to a maximum of three further years”.

The closing date for the tender is October 13.

Cable backs lifelong learning accounts at Lib Dems conference

The Liberal Democrat leader has backed the creation of lifelong learning accounts in his party conference speech today.

Sir Vince Cable, who published a report with the National Union of Students on how to improve learner experience in post-16 education, explained to delegates in Bournemouth how he would like to help more people retrain or improve their skills-set in later life.

“One idea I want to develop with you – with the party – is finding a way to support all young people in future with an endowment or learning account, which they can use at any stage in life,” said the former business secretary, in his final day speech.

He explained that this could involve “helping to finance further or higher education, either at the post-18 stage or later in life”.

“It is a fundamentally liberal idea, handing control to the individual, and I want to explore how it can be sustainably financed through fair taxation of wealth,” he continued.

Dr Cable also stressed that he wanted the party to be widely recognised as the “champions of lifelong learning”.

Former top skills civil servant Sue Pember, now director of policy at adult learning provider membership body Holex, welcomed Dr Cable’s focus on improving funding for learning in later life.

“We support the concept of a learning account that could travel with the student through different stages of their lives,” she said. “If we are to grow and prosper after Brexit, we need a comprehensive adult education, skills and employment funding plan.”

She countered, however, that lifelong learning accounts are only a “great idea”, if “they are matched with extra resource”.

The issue of how best to upskill older people returned to the spotlight recently, in reaction against what has been perceived as overwhelming recent focus on 16-to-19 learning, in particular through apprenticeships.

The then-skills minister Robert Halfon told FE Week in January that lifelong learning was firmly back on the government’s agenda.

An industrial strategy green paper published in the same month further committed to exploring “ambitious new approaches to encouraging lifelong learning”.

FE Week launched its #SaveOurAdultEducation in February, calling on the government to consult on a properly coordinated adult education strategy.

Matthew Taylor, the chief executive of the Royal Society of Arts, who was asked by the prime minister to “develop proposals to improve the lives of this country’s citizens” through the workplace, went further and backed a return to learning accounts.

His July report warned that current funding rules meant that someone who has worked for much of their working life, but who now needs to retrain, was unlikely to get much help or support.

“The government should explore a new approach to learning accounts, perhaps with an initial focus on those with a long-working record, but who need to retrain and those in receipt of universal credit,” he wrote.

The Skills Commission meanwhile recommended in April that the government should “look into the feasibility of learning accounts and their effectiveness in directing workers towards in-demand roles”.

Labour’s shadow skills minister Gordon Marsden told FE Week that he backed “new credit accumulation structures and national insurance-style contributory learning accounts” as far back as 2014.

He expanded on the idea in an article for One Nation Fizz, which was published that year by centre-left thinkers in response to then-Labour leader Ed Miliband’s call for new policy ideas.

“The last Labour government’s innovative system of individual learning accounts stalled due to problems with implementation,” he wrote.

“But the ideas behind it remain relevant, including the notion of a tripartite contribution system, by means of which businesses and individuals, including the self-employed, could be given incentives to pay in modest amounts each month (such as matched-funding).”

The individual learning accounts scheme was unveiled in the 1997 Labour Party manifesto, as a means of supporting adult education with a system of tax incentives.

But the policy was scrapped in 2001 after abuse by unscrupulous providers led to a reported £67 million fraud.

The National Audit Office blamed this in part on poor planning and risk management by the government.

Two thirds of loan-funded learners from collapsed providers still lack alternative provision

Over two thirds of learners from providers that have collapsed – leaving them with huge loan debt but no qualifications – have still not been moved onto alternative courses.

The situation has become so dire that Robert Halfon (pictured right), the new chair of the Commons education select committee, is now backing FE Week’s campaign to get the government to refund all the affected learners.

We have been demanding justice for the hundreds of adult students who’ve been left in the lurch by failed providers since January, when it emerged that the Department for Education was refusing to write off advanced learner loans held by over 200 Londoners left high and dry by the collapse of John Frank training in November.

This situation was echoed at Hampshire-based Edudo Ltd, and Darlington’s Focus Training & Development Ltd, so FE Week launched its #SaveOurAdultEducation campaign to get the debts cancelled.

However, just 112 of the 344 affected students have since been transferred to other providers.

Mr Halfon told FE Week that he was “incredibly concerned” about the figures, which were obtained through a Freedom of Information request.

It is “the duty” of the Education and Skills Funding Agency to refund learners if they cannot be found “adequate” alternative provision, he insisted – which must be close enough to home to make travel affordable and practical.

The DfE confirmed that 93 of the 112 transferred learners studied at JFT, and the other 19 were at Edudo.

Twenty more of Edudo’s 95 former learners are apparently meanwhile “in the process” of transferring, meaning 42 per cent are still unaccounted for.

How the hell am I supposed to sort myself out?

Worse yet, not one of the 37 affected students from Focus Training have been found new providers since the organisation went under last December.

In total, there are still 212 students from these defunct providers – with no end in sight for their loans misery.

Asim Shaheen is a former student of JFT who has been unable to complete a level three hospitality and catering course which was funded by a loan of over £8,000, and who became a focal point of our campaign after he travelled from Stoke to Westminster in February to confront Mr Halfon – then the skills minister.

“After I came all the way to Westminster to see the minister I’ve heard nothing,” he told FE Week. “The government sent me one letter saying it was my responsibility to go and sort out a new provider for myself and that was that.

“I’ve got no portfolio because it was with JFT, who I can’t contact, so how the hell am I supposed to sort myself out?”

He claimed the government “has no back up plan” and that learners like him have been “left in the middle of nowhere, expected to find our own way home”.

A Department for Education spokesperson said: “The student loans company made contact with all affected learners. Of the 344 learners affected, and of whom wished to continue their learning, 132 have chosen to continue with an alternative provider.”

Our FoI only focused on the three failed training providers we investigated last year, but there may well be many more learners in the same situation who simply have not yet been brought to light.

Mr Halfon said he was “keen” for the education committee to “look at the quality of both public and private training providers and the role government plays in terms of how students are treated if these institutions fail”.

It’s judgement time for the ESFA on degree apprenticeships

So, the tenders are in for the second attempt at procurement for apprenticeship provision for non-levy paying employers, and it’s over to the ESFA.

As well as evaluating tenders, we’d suggest it’s also time to hold the ESFA’s own performance to account. It’s fundamental this time that the procurement is successful and works to the skills needs of employers, localities and the country as a whole. No one would argue that managing anything on this scale is easy – but isn’t it the ESFA’s job? And they designed it, complexities and all. In apprenticeship terminology, shouldn’t the ESFA have the knowledge, skills and behaviours to manage a successful procurement?

The University Vocational Awards Council (UVAC), as a representative organisation, has raised concerns along with others on the procurement. The unstable nature of the process, the repeated updates to forms, the 800 tender clarifications, the last-minute deadline extension with 48 hours to go, the changes to threshold calculations, and even the fact that a critical procurement exercise was run over the summer have all been problematic.

The fact that getting this procurement right is so important for the apprenticeships reforms in general and degree apprenticeships in particular was outlined in a recent report from HEFCE, the higher education regulator. Remember also that apprenticeships are the government’s flagship productivity programme and that around a third of new employer-developed standards are at higher-education level. We’re not therefore talking about niche provision.

There’s been a loss of confidence in the ESFA – or at least this part of the organisation

HEFCE’s report identified three things in particular. Just 13 per cent of degree apprenticeship starts planned with non-levy payers remained after the ESFA’s first attempt at procurement. After the first round was paused, one higher education provider adjusted its targeted starts for non-levy paying employers downwards from 90 to two, while a London institution went from 77 to zero. One region had no provider with any allocation to deliver degree apprenticeships to non-levy paying employers.

In one case study, a higher education provider “had conducted a survey of demand for apprenticeship provision among (its local) SME population, which showed around 50 SMEs had an immediate or future interest in degree apprenticeship, and a further 60 SMEs requested further information”. After the pause, the provider was unable to follow up even “such clearly evidenced local demand”.

From UVAC’s perspective, this is a rather worrying position for what’s supposed to be England’s flagship productivity programme. It’s also important to realise that the damage caused by the failure of the first attempt at procurement isn’t just a short-term problem. There’s been a loss of confidence in the ESFA – or at least this part of the organisation. Higher education providers had developed partnerships not just with SMEs, but also with LEPs and further education providers, many of which have been delayed or abandoned. Momentum has been lost and some HEIs took the decision to focus on levy-paying employer business, to the detriment of the productivity agenda. 

The silence, at least in public, of the Institute for Apprenticeships on the ESFA’s approach to procurement of provision is surprising. I appreciate that the Institute’s remit focuses on the quality of standards and assessment plans and advising on funding bands. But, if ESFA’s funding system prevents non-levy payers from using the new apprenticeships developed through the trailblazer process, such employers can’t benefit from new high-quality standards.

The attempt will reveal whether the ESFA is a “skills” funding agency able to fund the apprenticeships developed by employer groups. I suspect no-one will be entirely happy with the outcome, but if the ESFA is able to demonstrate it has been based on the offer developed by employers, clearly reflective of employer demand and the policy pillars of enhancing social mobility and raising productivity, it may be able to redeem a reputation.

Adrian Anderson is chief executive of the University Vocational Awards Council