Revealed: How two businessmen left a trail of insolvency and debt in the apprenticeship market

A month-long FE Week investigation has uncovered a trail of insolvency and debt left by two businessmen, David Harper and Mark Hargreaves, who’ve created a complex web of companies involving Talent Training and AMS Nationwide which received millions in apprenticeship funding from the government.

Questions are now being raised over why a multinational employer, Santander, chose to move a lucrative apprenticeship contract from Talent Training to AMS, after the former went bust with £1.4 million debt.

Fast forward a year and AMS has now also gone into administration, on the same day that Mr Harper and a former HR director of Santander launched a training provider in Glasgow.

 

The demise of Talent Training

Mr Harper and Mr Hargreaves have incorporated numerous businesses in recent years, within a structure led by a holding company called HarperCo and operating out of HarperCo House in the north east.

At HarperCo, according to their website in early 2017, Mr Harper was chairman and owner and Mr Hargreaves was head of investments and acquisitions.

Of the many subsidiary companies connected to it, nearly all of HarperCo’s income was derived from Talent Training, which was owned by Mr Harper and received millions in government funding for apprenticeships over many years.

READ MORE: Major provider exposed for offering inducements goes into administration

The company also claimed to have £130 million of apprenticeship-levy business lined up, with contracts to deliver training for big firms including high-street bank Santander.

But in June 2017 an undercover FE Week investigation caught a Talent Training employee offering banned inducements, where as much as 20 per cent of the provider’s government funding per apprenticeship was being offered to a firm that was considering its training services.

The company insisted at the time that no inducement payments had actually been paid, but it called in administrators David Rubin and Partners in August when the ESFA pulled its contracts after it became aware of our findings.

Around 100 jobs were lost.

While Mr Harper was a listed director of Talent Training on Companies House, Mr Hargreaves was not.

But his LinkedIn page shows that he worked at the provider as its managing director for over four years from 2009.

Mr Hargreaves claimed to FE Week that he stopped working for Talent Training and HarperCo in November 2013 and November 2014 respectively.

But in a later conversation he admitted that he led redundancy meetings at the provider in 2017 and FE Week has seen evidence that he was an integral part of the running of Talent Training right up until it was taken into administration.

 

The rise and fall of AMS Nationwide

Mr Hargreaves joined AMS Nationwide under the name of “Ian” as a director in September 2017, a month after Talent Training went into administration.

It is understood that he started running the firm, which was a subcontractor to Talent Training, at this point when the majority shareholders Martin Rocks and Martin Foster became silent partners.

AMS started delivering its own apprenticeships for the first time in October 2017.

Mr Hargreaves told FE Week that he “recruited a couple of people from Talent” when he moved to AMS, and “got a couple of contracts that Talent Training had been dealing with”.

READ MORE: Major apprenticeship provider to Santander goes bust after Ofsted mauling

FE Week understands one of these contracts was with Santander to train back-office staff within its subsidiary, Geoban. Mr Hargreaves claims on his LinkedIn page to have taken the monthly turnover of AMS from £10,000 to £250,000 in four months.

He told FE Week that there was a “contractual relationship” with Mr Harper, who is not listed as a director for AMS, who “did certain business-development exercises” for the company, and was used “under a consultancy arrangement”.

Despite not being listed as a director at AMS and not responding to any
FE Week questions, it is understood that Mr Harper played a central role in running the company. Mr Hargreaves claims to have “retired” and left AMS in June 2018.

Three months later the ESFA carried out an audit of the provider and found that “payments were being incorrectly reclaimed” which resulted in a claim being issued against the company for £177,000, according to a directors’ report to creditors for AMS, obtained by FE Week.

Click to enlarge

Ofsted went knocking a month later and found the provider claiming funding for delivering little to no training. The inspectorate gave the company an ‘insufficient progress’ monitoring report.

The firm’s reduced cash flow and “inability to source new work” caused it to cease trading immediately, with over £400,000 in debts, says the creditor report. Included in the creditors list is £15,000 owed to Mr Hargreaves, despite his claim that he left the company altogether in June 2018. He did not respond to requests for comment when asked about this discrepancy.

Amongst other creditors connected to Mr Harper, £106,000 was owed by AMS to HarperCo.

AMS called in David Rubin and Partners, in November 2017, the same administrator which handled Talent Training and two other dissolved companies set up by Mr Harper and Mr Hargreaves – Hco-Consult Limited, and Driving Careers Limited.

The DfE has remained tight-lipped about what action they have taken against AMS.

 

The birth of Go-Centric

Despite leaving this trail of debt, FE Week has learnt that Mr Harper has now set up a new training provider called Go-Centric in Scotland.

He’s doing this with the former HR director of Santander, Joanne Mansell, who was responsible for “talent” at the bank and now works at HarperCo as its chief operating officer.

Santander told FE Week it had 32 apprentices with AMS at the time of the company going bust.

But the bank declined to comment on whether it is investigating Ms Mansell’s relationship with Mr Harper, Talent Training and AMS.

 

The web of companies and people involved

 

Talent Training

The defunct training provider, based in south Tyneside, was incorporated in April 2007.

It was the main income generator for the HarperCo group, owned by David Harper, and gained millions of pounds in ESFA funding. In 2016/17 alone its contracts were worth more than £8 million.

The company, which also claimed to have apprenticeship-levy business lined up worth more than £130 million, went bust in August 2017 after the ESFA terminated its contracts.

This followed an undercover FE Week investigation in June 2017 which found a Talent Training employee offering banned inducements.

It went under with debts totalling more than £1.4 million. Among its creditors are the HMRC, who are owed over £153,000, HarperCo, owed over £90,000, and AMS Nationwide, owed over £16,000 from its former subcontracting relationship with Talent Training.

But as this newspaper revealed last week, the ESFA paid a further quarter of a million pounds to the firm after
it collapsed.

The company’s administrator, David Rubin and Partners, has so far racked-up fees of close to a quarter of million pounds according to its latest progress report, published on Companies House.

And almost £30,000 was handed over by the administrator to Mr Harper for assisting with the ESFA payment.

Talent Training has also launched a legal challenge against the ESFA in an effort to claim more cash, in the hope of “high recovery value”, which is ongoing.

Despite its large debts, the administrator’s report also
shows that Mr Harper owes the company up to £1 million, after taking out a “six-figure” director’s loan, which needs to be paid back in full
by June 30, 2019.

 

HarperCo

HarperCo is a holding company founded in 2009.

David Harper is the sole active director with more than 75 per cent ownership of shares – and financial statements to March 31, 2017 show negative reserves of £161,268 and dividends to him totalling £140,000 declared in May 2016.

HarperCo’s LinkedIn page states that it operates across a number of business sectors including apprenticeships, skills development and property investments via a variety of related organisations including Talent Training (UK) LLP, Talent Partnerships UK Limited, Hco-Consult Limited, Hco-Lean Limited, Hco-People Limited, Hco-Sustain Limited and Very Niche Ltd.

It claims to be a “well-respected business incubation company, based on South Tyneside, with an impressive list of high-profile clients and business investments” with up to 200 employees and offices in Bristol, Darlington, Gatwick and Glasgow.

Mr Harper claims that HarperCo has grown into a “national multi-million pound group”.

At the time of going to press the HarperCo website was “under construction” and in May 2018 Google street view showed HarperCo House up for sale.

 

AMS Nationwide

The company was incorporated in 2012 and started out in marketing, “producing leads for a small number of different solicitors in the personal injury sector” before offering “workforce training and development” in 2017.

It became an approved apprenticeship provider by the ESFA in March 2017 and began offering its own apprenticeships in October that year, according to its Ofsted monitoring visit report which was published earlier this month on December 4.

It had ESFA contracts totalling £500,000 for 2018/19 and trained over 400 apprentices this year.

The provider had a number of levy-paying employer contracts including Santander, Guarding UK and Stobart Group Ltd.

AMS went bust in November following visits from the ESFA and Ofsted, with just £1,745.84 in the bank and £414,329.15 in creditors.

An audit by the agency found that “payments were being incorrectly reclaimed”.

Ofsted visited a month after the ESFA and its monitoring report gave an ‘insufficient progress’ verdict, meaning AMS got kicked off the apprenticeships register and banned from delivering apprenticeships.

Its creditors list includes £175,000 owed to ESFA and £31,000 to HMRC.

It also owes £4,000 to Nick Merrey – the husband of Mr Harper – £15,000 to Mr Hargreaves and £106,000 to HarperCo.

Over £9,800 is also owed to a firm called 8th Green Developments Limited, which was incorporated by Mr Merrey, Mr Harper and Mr Hargreaves in December 2015.

David Rubin and Partners are handling the administration for AMS Nationwide.

Martin Rocks and Martin Foster are listed as the company’s majority shareholders.

 

David Rubin & Partners

David Rubin & Partners is an administration firm.

It states on its website that it “specialises in business turnaround and rescue, corporate and personal insolvency, forensic accounting, and litigation support”.

The firm has handled the administration for four companies that Mr Harper and Mr Hargreaves have run: Talent Training (UK) LLP, AMS Nationwide Ltd, Hco-Consult Limited and Driving Careers Limited.

A report to creditors document published on Companies House earlier this year said its fees were already close to £250,000 for handling the administration for Talent Training.

FE Week attempted to contact the insolvency practitioners at David Rubin & Partners handling the administration for Mr Harper and Mr Hargreaves’ various companies multiple times, but they would not respond.

 

Go-Centric

In November 2018 a dormant company called Hco-Sustain Ltd, which Mr Harper and Mr Hargreaves incorporated on September 15, 2015, registered a name change on Companies House to now be called Go-Centric.

Joanne Mansell (front) with David Harper (back right) presenting at launch of Go-Centric “new company name brand” on November 20, 2018, according to the company’s Facebook and LinkedIn pages

A Registration of Charge document, dated August 31, 2018, and signed by Mr Harper, shows the firm taking on the assets of a training provider in Glasgow called Impact Results Limited that had appointed a liquidator on August 6, 2018.

Last month a Go-Centric launch event took place in Glasgow at which Mr Harper and Joanne Mansell, the former HR director of Geoban UK – now called Santander UK Operations Limited – were present.

Ms Mansell’s LinkedIn profile states that she is now chief operating officer of HarperCo. She “recommended” Go-Centric on her Facebook page on November 16, and posted this message: “It’s a people and customer-centric business that really works to help people and businesses prosper.”

Go-Centric’s website states it is a “multi-channel contact centre and training provider based in Glasgow, with over 20 years’ experience managing the customer service, retention and acquisition needs of a wide range of businesses, from major high-street retailers to national utility providers”.

 

Joanne Mansell

Joanne Mansell is a former HR director and executive board member of Santander Operations who worked for the high-street bank from January 2010 to September 2018, according to her LinkedIn page.

Joanne Mansell

Before this she held the top HR role at Coca-Cola Enterprises and then Santander’s subsidiary company, Geoban.

While at Santander, Ms Mansell was responsible for “the complete HR, learning, talent and internal communications functions and processes within the company,” according to her LinkedIn profile.

She became the chief operating officer of HarperCo after she left Santander, according to her LinkedIn page, and is playing a key role in the running of Go-Centric for David Harper.

She put the phone down without providing any comment when approached by FE Week.

 

Their side of the story: Introducing David Harper and Mark Hargreaves

 

David Harper

FE Week has contacted David Harper multiple times over the last month and finally managed to catch him on the phone two weeks ago. He requested that we send questions about his tangled web of companies to him via email, but he has not responded despite numerous attempts.

Given that he has refused to tell his side of the story, FE Week has pulled together a biography to shed some light on who he is.

Mr Harper is a 38-year-old millionaire businessman who has created multiple companies across a number of different business sectors, ranging from apprenticeships to property investment.

In April 2014 he purchased a £1.2 million property in the north east, complete with a swimming pool, tennis court, paddock and stables. Since then the property has undergone substantial redevelopment.

David Harper

He also owns a McLaren MP4-12C supercar and a Range Rover Autobiography, both with personalised Talent Training numberplates, which are worth around £150,000 each.

His main company is HarperCo. On the firm’s website in 2017 Mr Harper described himself as a “successful, ambitious and driven entrepreneur”.

“He has established and grown a small business to be a national multi-million pound group today,” it said.

“David’s business interests are principally held in HarperCo Limited, his parent investment company.

“With a passion for people and business development, David is focused on the continued growth of the group with a keen interest in building new investment channels.

“David takes an active role in client relationships across his companies and drives the strategic development of sales and marketing.”

Via Companies House, FE Week has found that Mr Harper has been the director for over 20 different businesses since 2004. Six of these firms are now closed.

He married Nick Merrey at a ceremony in Scotland in  August 2015. The couple have both been directors for a number of the same companies, including Talent Acquisitions (north east) Limited and 8th Green Developments Limited.

David Harper’s McLaren MP4-12C supercar and Range Rover Autobiography with personalised Talent Training numberplates

In March 2014 Mr Harper became a patron at The Prince’s Trust and still holds the role today, according to his LinkedIn page.

A year later he became a board trustee at Pathways4All, a charity that provides leisure and social opportunities for children with disabilities and additional needs in the north east, as well as a board member of the North East Local Enterprise Partnership in April 2015.

His most well-known single company in the FE market was Talent Training, but as explained on pages 10 and 11, it went bust in August last year after being caught offering banned inducements.

Mr Harper told FE Week at the time of the exposé that he was “shocked to hear that alleged offers may have been made in order to win business”.

“We are investigating but can confirm these incentives would be against all our business principles and would not make it through our governance processes”.

He worked at AMS Nationwide on a consultancy basis as it started to offer its own apprenticeships and after Talent went bust in late 2017, as confirmed by Mark Hargreaves.

It is unclear if Mr Harper continued working at AMS up until the point it went into administration.

David Harper’s home swimming pool

 

Mark Hargreaves

Mark Hargreaves is a 60-year-old businessman who has worked at some of the largest professional services firms in the world including Grant Thornton and Coopers & Lybrand.

He “retired” when he was 40 but then moved into the apprenticeships market in 2009 after being recruited by Mr Harper to work at HarperCo as its head of investments and acquisitions, and as the managing director of Talent Training.

An older version of the HarperCo website from 2017 states: “Mark is a chartered accountant who hates numbers and didn’t want a desk job.

“He was the youngest ever partner at Coopers & Lybrand and has travelled the world counting beans.

“He returned to the UK as managing partner for Grant Thornton, where he carried out the first UK-based NASDAQ float and worked on business turnarounds before retiring at the age of 40.

“’I got a call from David in January 2009 and came in for four months, but he wouldn’t let me leave.’”

Mark Hargreaves

Mr Hargreaves’ LinkedIn profile says he was the office managing partner at Coopers & Lybrand from July 1985 to July 1990, providing audit and tax services to US, UK, European, Korean and Saudi businesses operating in Saudi, Kuwait and Bahrain.

The firm merged in 1998 with Price Waterhouse to become PricewaterhouseCoopers and is now known as PwC.

In August 1990 Mr Hargreaves became an office managing partner at Grant Thornton UK LLP, and worked there until June 2002.

From 2003 to 2007 he claims to have been the financial director at a firm called Atomic Planet Entertainment.

Mr Hargreaves is listed as either an active or former director of nearly 20 companies on Companies House.

Since joining up with Mr Harper, the pair have been directors for at least 10 of the same firms.

When first contacted by FE Week Mr Hargreaves was quite open about his work with Talent Training, HarperCo and AMS Nationwide.

He offered an explanation as to why he is called “Ian” on AMS’ Companies House page when he is actually called “Mark” (see transcript below), and also claimed to have cut ties with Talent and HarperCo in November 2013 and November 2014 respectively.

But in a later text-message conversation he confirmed that he led redundancy meetings at the provider in 2017 and FE Week has seen evidence that he was an integral part of the running of Talent Training right up until it was taken into administration.

This newspaper went back to Mr Hargreaves to ask him to explain why, after years of apparently not working there, he was asked to tell Talent staff that they were being made redundant.

But it was at this point he stopped responding to requests for comment.

FE Week’s follow-up questions included why AMS still owes him £15,000 if he left the company in June 2018, as he claimed. This newspaper is yet to receive a response to this.

The companies ran by both David Harper and Mark Hargreaves

On his LinkedIn page, Mr Hargreaves describes himself as: “A fully qualified finance director with a vast range of experiences across several widely different sectors.

“I have operated as a managing director and operations director, and have developed and led operational and financial strategies to facilitate and accelerate growth plans and, on occasions, to rescue failing businesses.

“I have recently completed a number of interesting transactions – including a corporate merger, a start-up and a management buy-in: and the valuation of a contingent asset!

“I am always looking for one or more new challenges  –  ideally in a sector which is new to me  – part-time and sweat-equity opportunities are particularly interesting.

“I would hate to be referred to as ‘just the finance director’  –  irrespective of whether the role be part-time, full-time, executive or non-executive, a strong finance director should push, and at times lead, the other members of any senior management team.”

It adds that since 2002, using the pen name “John Ashton”, he has had three novels published: Business Breakfast, Liquid Lunch, and Dinner with Mandelson.

He is now “on the road to full retirement”.

 

The interview: FE Week quizzes Mark Hargreaves

FE Week first spoke to Mr Hargreaves on November 29, and quizzed him on his name discrepancy on companies house and his roles at Talent Training, AMS Nationwide and HarperCo. Here’s how the conversation went:

Mr Hargreaves: Hello.

Reporter: Is that Ian?

Mr Hargreaves: No.

Reporter: Oh, is that Mr
Hargreaves?

Mr Hargreaves: Yes.

Reporter: I’m writing about AMS Nationwide going into voluntary liquidation. As one of the former directors, can you explain why?

Mr Hargreaves: I can’t help you at all, I left way back in June, so I have no idea what is going on there. No contact with the company because
I have been travelling.

Reporter: Is your first name Mark then?

Mr Hargreaves: Well no, it is Mark Ian.

Reporter: Is that a joint first name?

Mr Hargreaves: No, it is Ian.

Reporter: So Ian is your first name?

Mr Hargreaves: Well no, Mark is, but I use the name Ian.

Reporter: Why’s that?

Mr Hargreaves: It was from when I was a student many, many years ago.

Reporter: What are your links with Talent Training? I understand you used to work there?

Mr Hargreaves: That was a long, long time ago.  And as far as AMS goes I was only involved for six months I think, so you are really talking to the wrong people, the wrong person.

Reporter: So you weren’t working at Talent Training when it went into administration?

Mr Hargreaves: Absolutely, I was working with a business in a completely different sector and had been for a couple of years at the time so I can’t answer any questions about what happened with that business because I just do not know other than rumour and gossip which isn’t what you guys want to hear.

Reporter: But when you went over to AMS you took over a lot of Talent’s business, correct?

Mr Hargreaves: Yeah. I recruited a couple of people from Talent, not many, a handful. And yeah I went and got a couple of contracts that Talent had been dealing with. It wasn’t a case of one company morphing into the other.

Reporter: Did David Harper come over from Talent to work for AMS?

Mr Hargreaves: There was a contractual relationship with him where he did certain business-development exercises. But that was it, it was under a consultancy arrangement.

Reporter: Did he carry on working there when you left AMS?

Mr Hargreaves: I finished on a Wednesday in early June and on the Thursday I got a flight out of the UK into the Pacific for a month so I have no idea.

Reporter: Talent Training has a legal case against the ESFA. Are you aware of that?

Mr Hargreaves: Seriously I have no idea about that at all. I had nothing to do with Talent for maybe four or five years so what they were doing or trying to do before they went into administration, what they’ve done afterwards, I literally have no idea. I left AMS I think on the 19th June and seriously since then I’ve not spoken to any of them or heard anything, other than a few weeks ago I heard about some of the guys being made redundant which was unfortunate.

Reporter: Why did you leave AMS?

Mr Hargreaves: I was 60 in the summer, I retired.

Reporter: We understand Ofsted came in for a monitoring visit. Were you there at the time it happened?

Mr Hargreaves: No.

Reporter: During the period you were there Ofsted had not come in at all?

Mr Hargreaves: That is correct.

Barring learners with fewer than three Ds ‘access to student loans’ is ‘retrograde step’

Proposals to deny student loans to learners who achieve fewer than three Ds in their A-levels have been branded a “retrograde step” by school and college leaders.

The Sunday Times reported yesterday that the ongoing independent review of higher education, chaired by former investment banker Philip Augar, will recommend proposals to shake-up the university sector.

That includes barring learners who do not achieve three Ds in their A-levels, or equivalent qualifications, from accessing student loans to fund a university degree.

Instead those learners, estimated to be around 20,000, will be offered loans for cheaper technical or vocational courses in further education colleges.

The review is also expected to recommend that tuition fees are slashed from £9,250 per year to between £6,500 and £7,500.

But Geoff Barton, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders (pictured above), said the union would be “very concerned about any move which reduces the opportunity of young people to go to university”.

“Given the importance of improving social mobility, it would be a retrograde step to do anything which would reduce access to university,” he said.

“Students accepted on to courses with lower grades may need appropriate support during their studies but we should not shut the door on them.”

The proposals, leaked to the Sunday Times, come as figures last month showed more than one in three school pupils who applied to university this year had some kind of unconditional offer.

The research seemed to support schools’ fears that these offers – which promote university places to pupils regardless of their A-level results – result in pupils making less effort in their final year.

Today the Office for National Statistics also announced changes on how the government accounts for student loans, with loans that are unlikely to be repaid now to be classed as government spending.

Currently 45 per cent of student loans handed out in England are not expected to be paid back in full, leading to estimations this will increase annual public sector net borrowing by the equivalent of £12 billion pounds.

There has been suggestions this change could also impact the higher education review, with the government now warned against decisions that could result in the return of a cap on student numbers.

Barton added: “It is certainly the case that university might not always be the best option, and there should be a range of high-quality routes available.

“But students should be able to make an informed choice on what route works best for them rather than it being determined by an arbitrary threshold around the eligibility of grades for student loans.”

Ofsted Watch: Three providers rated ‘good’ in first inspections

It’s been a big week for new providers, with five first-time inspection reports published – three of which resulted in a ‘good’ rating.

Elsewhere a college was downgraded from a grade two to three, while seven monitoring visit reports were published.

The Results Consortium Limited, an independent learning provider, got a ‘good’ result this week in a report published December 10 and based on an inspection in late October.

Directors at the provider, which offers loans-funded provision in business administration and adult social care, were praised for “investing significantly in developing technology and digital learning” that enabled “learners to learn around their existing work and home commitments”.

“Most” learners attend lessons “frequently” and “diligently work independently outside of lessons to produce a good standard of written work”.

“Learners improve their confidence and acquire good work-related skills that enable most to progress to, or remain in, employment or learning at a higher level,” the report said.

Barrett Bell Ltd, another independent learning provider, also received a grade two in its first ever inspection, carried out in late October and published December 10.

The provider offers training to become a gas engineer primarily for learners referred by JobCentre Plus, and inspectors noted leaders’ “clear vision and high ambitions” centred “successfully” on “helping unemployed learners achieve their aspirations”.

Learners “achieve well” – thanks to tutors’ “significant industry experience” – and develop their employability skills “exceptionally well”.

“Learners are proud of their achievements and appreciate the positive impact on their lives and the lives of their families,” inspectors found.

The Ridge Employability College, an independent specialist college, was rated ‘good’ in a report published December 10 and based on its first ever inspection, carried out in early November.

Leaders at the college, which offers FE and training for learners aged 16 to 25 with learning difficulties or disabilities, have “successfully established high-quality provision”.

They use high-needs funding “effectively” to “provide an ambitious learning environment” that helps learners “develop good practical skills”.

Learners “benefit from high-quality work experience with local employers” and “develop strong work-related and organisational skills that help them to move on to appropriate jobs”.

The Colchester Institute lost its previous grade two rating in a report, published December 12 and based on an inspection in early November, that rated the college ‘requires improvement’.

The college’s “quality assurance processes and improvement planning” were found to “lack clarity”, while leaders did not “focus on the impact of teachers’ practice on learners’ progress”.

“As a result, essential improvements are not made to teaching, learning and assessment,” the report said.

The college’s apprenticeship provision as rated ‘good’, and most employers “value the technical off-the-job training provided”.

Independent learning provider Dhunay Corporation Ltd was rated ‘requires improvement’ in its first report, published December 12 and based on an inspection in early November.

Governors’ challenge of leaders and managers at the provider, which offers adult learning programmes, traineeships and apprenticeships, was deemed “insufficient”.

“Governors do not receive enough information to give them an accurate oversight of the quality of provision,” the report said.

Staff and assessors were criticised for failing to check apprentices’ and learners’ “prior skills and knowledge in enough detail”, and for consequently not teaching sessions that “build on these skills to challenge all apprentices and learners”.

But adult learners on some pre-employment courses “makes very good progress and achieve their qualifications”.

As previously reported by FE Week, independent provider Beyond 2030 was rated ‘inadequate’ in its first ever inspection this week, which found evidence of copy and paste assignments and raised concerns over safeguarding.

Five apprenticeship early monitoring visit reports were published this week.

Two of these, for Crosby Management Limited and the IT Skills Management Company Limited, found the provider to be making ‘significant progress’ in one theme under review and ‘reasonable progress’ in the remaining two areas.

The three other providers – Capital 4 Training Limited, Ricoh UK Limited, and Birmingham Women’s and Children’s Hospital NHS Foundation Trust – were all found to be making ‘reasonable progress’ in all three themes.

A further two monitoring visits, to providers currently rated ‘requires improvement’, were published this week: Hertford Regional College, and Lakeside Early Adult Provision – LEAP College (Wargrove House Ltd).

GFE colleges Inspected Published Grade Previous grade
Colchester Institute 06/11/2018 12/12/2018 3 2
Hertford Regional College 14/11/2018 12/12/2018 M M

 

Independent learning providers Inspected Published Grade Previous grade
Dhunay Corporation Ltd 06/11/2018 12/12/2018 3
Results Consortium Limited 30/10/2018 10/12/2018 2
Beyond 2030 30/10/2018 12/12/2018 4
Barrett Bell Ltd 23/10/2018 10/12/2018 2
The IT Skills Management Company Limited 08/11/2018 14/12/2018 M M
Crosby Management Training Ltd 21/11/2018 11/12/2018 M M
Capital 4 Training Limited 07/11/2018 13/12/2018 M M
Ricoh UK Limited 07/11/2018 12/12/2018 M M

 

Employer provider Inspected Published Grade Previous grade
Birmingham Women’s and Children’s Hospital NHS Foundation Trust 14/11/2018 10/12/2018 M M

 

Other FE Inspected Published Grade Previous grade
Lakeside Early Adult Provision – LEAP College (Wargrove House Ltd) 14/11/2018 12/12/2018 M M
The Ridge Employability College 07/11/2018 10/12/2018 2

MOVERS AND SHAKERS: EDITION 265

Your weekly guide to who’s new and who’s leaving

Naomi Clayton, deputy director of research and development, Learning and Work Institute

Start date: January 2019

Previous job: Policy and research manager at Centre for Cities, and deputy director at the What Works Centre for Local Economic Growth

Interesting fact: Naomi spent her summers in between university as a park ranger – it was an eye opening experience!


Joe Dromey, deputy director of research and development, Learning and Work Institute

Start date: January 2019

Previous job: Senior research fellow, Institute for Public Policy Research

Interesting fact: Joe started his career as an employment advisor on a welfare to work programme where he helped over 100 long-term unemployed people into work


Jake Tween, Head of apprenticeships, DSW Apprenticeships

Start date: December 2018 

Previous job: Head of apprenticeships, ILM

Interesting fact: Jake is a keen songwriter and musician and has shared a stage with some household names.

The ESFA may regret rejecting the IfA’s levy budget concerns

As revealed by FE Week, the IfA has warned that there could be a £500m overspend on the £2bn apprenticeship budget this year.

 This, their analysis shows, rises to a £1.5 billion overspend for 2020/21 when the entire £2bn budget would be used paying for apprentices that started in previous years, leaving nothing for new starts.

Readers may find these predictions a surprise, even bizarre, in the context of a fall in starts and employers on average only using a small fraction of their levy pot.

And in an interview with FE Week, the top civil servant responsible for apprentices said he was not forecasting the budget to be exceeded – not this year anyway.

But in truth, the way employers pay monthly for apprenticeships, it is more than possible that a slow start will rapidly grow out of control.

 Consider a levy paying employer starting one £5,000 apprentice per month for 12 months from the start of 2018/19 (total value of £60,000) with the minimum duration for a standard of 13 months (372 days).

 In August, the employer levy spend would be £333 for one start, rising to £666 in September when there are two starts and by the July (once there are 12 starts) the payment for a single month would be £3,667 (more than ten times the cost of August).

And that is before any of the 20 per cent completion payments are paid, in this case worth £1,000 of the £5,000 per apprentice.

So in this example, after a year the monthly cost has risen from £333 to £3,667 and costing a total of £23,333 in 2018/19 with a further £36,667 ‘carry-over’ to be paid in 2019/20 (excluding the cost of any starts in 2019/20).

This exponential growth in both in-year and carry-over monthly payments can quickly get out of control and makes the Institute for Apprenticeships forecast plausible.

And analysis published by FE Week this week suggests the average cost of standards is far greater than the ESFA would have expected.

We’ve taken latest starts data for every standard and compared it to the funding rate band cap when introduced in May 2017. Even taking account of drop-outs, it seems reasonable to suggest average funding is more than £8,000 per apprentice. This peaks in September, when many of the most expensive courses begin – such as the two year £18,000 MBA.

This is likely to be more than double the average framework costs before May 2017 (around £3,000 for 500,000 starts at £1.5bn per year) and far higher than the ESFA was expecting given the budget in England has only risen by £500 million, around a third higher.

The IfA programme of rate reductions will reduce the average cost, typically by around a third.

 So as it stands their £4.2 billion prediction in 2020/21 with no funding for new starts could not only be right but – dare I say it – even conservative.

AoC fears college apprenticeships market share will shrink further

The Association of Colleges has warned that colleges’ share of the apprenticeship market will continue to shrink, after FE Week analysis revealed they have been hit hardest by the move to levy funding.

New statistics from the Department for Education, which included the number of starts per provider for the first time, show that colleges’ share of the market dropped from 31 to 26 per cent from 2016/17 to 2017/18, while their starts plummeted 35 per cent.

Teresa Frith, senior policy manager at the AoC, said that colleges had been particularly badly hit by changes in the apprenticeships market – and warned that the situation was likely to get worse.

“Apprenticeship reforms have shifted funding towards large employers and higher level standards while restricting the money paid for younger apprentices and small companies,” she said.

“This change in the market has made it harder for colleges.”

Referring to FE Week’s exclusive revelation last week that the apprenticeships budget is forecast to be overspent by £500 million this year, she warned that “as the budget becomes more over-committed in 2019, there will be more and more colleges turning small employers and young apprentices down because they can’t afford to offer training for free”.

Ms Frith said it was “right to highlight shifts in the supply side of the apprenticeship market” but urged the DfE to publish information on which employers are spending their levy funds.

“Without this data, we’ll only have a partial picture of what is going on.”

The new data showed that colleges were responsible for 99,220 starts last year, down by 35 per cent – or 52,740 – on the previous year’s total of 151,960.

That’s an 11 percentage-point bigger fall than the sector-wide drop of 24 per cent, revealed in last week’s final year figures.

Some of this fall in starts will have been the result of changes to rules around subcontracting which hit colleges that had previously subcontracted much of their provision.

West Nottinghamshire College, which previously subcontracted the overwhelming majority of its provision, had just 1,440 starts last year – down by a massive 79 per cent on the previous year’s total of 6,830.

The college blamed the rule changes, which meant it could no longer subcontract entire apprenticeship programmes, for having to make £2.7 million savings and cut 100 jobs earlier this year – before it spiralled into a financial crisis that led former principal Dame Asha Khemka to resign.

And Eastleigh College, which previously told FE Week it subcontracted around 80 per cent of its provision, saw its start numbers drop by 75 per cent – from 6,720 in 2016/17 to 1,630 in 2017/18.

While colleges’ share of the market declined last year, “other public funded” providers – which includes universities and employers – saw their share go up from eight per cent to 12 per cent as starts jumped 17 per cent.

They were responsible for 45,540 starts last year – an increase of 17 per cent on the previous year’s figure of 38,910.

Much of this growth was at providers new to the apprenticeship market, including universities delivering degree-level apprenticeships for the first time.

Independent providers’ share of the market remained at 61 per cent over the two years, while starts fell by 24 per cent – the same as the sector average.

They delivered 228,090 starts in 2017/18, down from 300,170 the year before.

That’s a drop of 24 per cent, the same proportion by which starts fell across the board last year, according to final full year figures published last week.

A freedom of information request last year by the Association of Employment and Learning Providers revealed that 74 per cent of all apprenticeship starts in 2015/16 were with independent providers, while colleges were responsible for just 21 per cent.

Last month the skills minister Anne Milton told the Association of Colleges conference that she wanted collaboration between colleges and private providers in delivering apprenticeships.

Her words were a change to what was written in her speech, which urged colleges to be “real competition” for private providers.

MBA apprenticeships defended by their biggest provider

As management degree apprenticeships continue to hit the headlines, with sector leaders voicing growing concern about their rising costs, FE Week spoke to the biggest apprenticeship MBA provider to hear the other side of the story.

 Last year 550 people started an apprenticeship MBA, according to official statistics, and the Cranfield University School of Management in Bedfordshire currently has 388 on the programme, valued at over £7 million.

And the university is preparing expand further from its focus on middle managers and higher, to introduce a new apprenticeship MBA in management and leadership for early career managers. Beginning in March, Cranfield hopes to have a cohort of 120 in its September intake.

Another management degree in logistics and supply chain will begin in February, but is expected to remain small at around 30 learners.

Melvyn Peters, director of education for the School of Management, said he believes higher-level apprenticeships are allowing a greater diversity of learners to access postgraduate courses without the fear of getting into debt.

“The ability to access a high-level postgraduate degree, without cost to yourself, is generating a lot of interest and enabling people to access it for the first time,” he said.

“Learners are more varied. I think it’s breaking down the old boys’ network. I think there was an element of that before. It’s allowing a much greater diversity and I think that has to be a good thing.”

 Ofsted chief Amanda Spielman used her annual report earlier this month to warn graduate schemes are being “rebadged” as apprenticeships and urged the government to give “greater thought” to how levy money is spent, while skills minister Anne Milton has previously warned of a “middle-class grab” on degree apprenticeships.

 But Mr Peters said that the “apprehension” about levy money being spent on high-level apprenticeships was a “misunderstanding”.

“The levy scheme was supposed to upskill across the economy, not just additional vocational apprenticeships,” he added.

 “If there is a reorientation back to lower-level apprenticeships then we’ll basically have a salary tax which is being used to cross subsidise other industries. I can’t see where Barclays or Zurich or companies of that ilk would have that lower-level apprenticeship need. For them it would be pure salary tax.”

Most of Cranfield’s degree apprenticeship programmes cost the maximum allowable under the levy, with the new management and leadership and logistic and supply chain degrees, as well as an existing degree in business and strategic leadership, all coming in at £18,000.

 However, the popular Executive MBA costs £27,000, with employers having to pay the extra out of their own pockets.

 Mr Peters said the non-apprenticeship version of the degrees had also been slimmed down so that the provision and cost is equal on both.

“We’ve been quite careful about how we adapt the programme to deliver. It wasn’t just a cost-cutting exercise, it was value identification.

 “What do these people absolutely have to have? How do we deliver that in a more cost-effective way?

“Without the burden of debt, this is enabling a lot more people to access higher-level qualifications for the first time,” he added. “That has to be a good thing.”

The Cranfield apprenticeships MBA teaching is delivered in “partnership” with Grant Thornton, although not, according to Cranfield, under a subcontracting arrangement.

Bailout cash will still be available under new insolvency regime

Colleges will still be able to access some bailout funding once the insolvency regime comes into effect next year – even though the government has previously said the tap will be switched off.

This was revealed in a letter from Peter Mucklow, FE director at the Education and Skills Funding Agency, published on Wednesday, which detailed post-16 funding arrangements for next year.

It said the agency’s “new approach to intervention, including the arrangements for the insolvency regime, will become operational in April 2019, once the restructuring facility has finally closed and longterm (over 12 months) exceptional financial support is no longer available”.

However, it did not mention either short- or medium-term EFS – indicating they will still be available.

A Department for Education spokesperson said it was “still looking into the details of the exceptional financial support. More information will be available in due course.”

Mr Mucklow’s letter said the incoming insolvency regime was a “significant” change for colleges, and would require “ever more effective monitoring and management of financial resources by colleges and those of us that have a responsibility for the best use of public funds”.

“We would strongly encourage you to audit your internal financial monitoring and management arrangements to satisfy yourselves that you can and will meet this challenge,” he wrote.

He urged colleges to address any financial issues “as early as possible”, as “the risk of deferring or taking an overly optimistic view of resolution now carries a significant risk”.

As part of a request from ministers to be “more proactive in anticipating financial concerns”, colleges “that are evidently deteriorating or at risk financially” should expect challenges from the agency.

The insolvency regime, which will allow colleges to go bust for the first time, was due to have been introduced this year but will now come into force on January 31, the DfE confirmed last month.

It has previously made it clear that once the insolvency regime comes into effect, the exceptional financial support tap will be switched off.

Cash from the restructuring facility, which was intended to support colleges to implement post-area review changes but has increasingly been used to prop up failing colleges, must also be spent by the end of March next year.

A spokesperson told FE Week in June that new arrangements would be put into place which would be “centred round the new insolvency regime”.

In an interview last month, the FE commissioner Richard Atkins (pictured above) said there was likely to be “some money to support colleges that have become insolvent to get back on their feet in some way”, but it was likely to be a “much smaller amount of money” than is available at the moment.

“I don’t think it will be given in the form of handouts to existing governors and management to carry on as you were,” he told FE Week.

Instead, he expected it would be focused on “ensuring that the provision in this area continues” where a college has “either become or is about to become insolvent”.

The costs of EFS are understood to have increased significantly in recent years.

FE Week reported in January that 12 cash-strapped colleges received bailouts totalling more than £11 million in December last year, after the DfE accidentally published the figures.

These included Bradford College, which received two payments each worth £1.5 million in the space of a month, and Stoke on Trent College, which received £500,000 while it awaited the outcome of a £21.9 million application to the restructuring facility.

EFS is cash for colleges that are “encountering financial, or cashflow, difficulties that put the continuation of provision at risk”, and is available as short-, medium- or long-term support.

Both short-term and medium-term re-profiling EFS would be paid back within 12 months, and may result in the college being issued a financial notice to improve.

Longer-term EFS is for cases where “it is clear that full repayment could not be made within 12 months”, and will automatically result in an ‘inadequate’ financial health rating for the college and intervention from the FE commissioner.

IfA consulting on content for five new T-level pathways

The Institute for Apprenticeships is seeking input from providers, awarding organisations and employers on the draft content for five more T-level pathways.

The new consultation is for courses in building services engineering, digital business services, health, healthcare science, and science, which are expected to be taught from September 2021 in wave two of the T-levels rollout.

It was launched today and runs for a month until January 17.

Sir Gerry Berragan, chief executive of the IfA, said: “It is so important that we have a world class technical education teaching offer.

“We know that as a nation we are being held back by a shortage of skills and T-levels will have a key part to play in changing that.”

Addressing employers, he added: “Your involvement as leaders in helping to develop the content is invaluable and I hope you will be able to stay engaged for a long time to come.”

This is the third batch of draft content to have gone out for consultation.

The first batch covered the first three pathways to be introduced for teaching from 2020: design, surveying and planning, in the constructions route; digital production, design and development, in the digital route; and education and childcare.

The second lot covered courses in onsite construction, building services engineering and digital support and services, which are expected to be rolled out from 2021 onwards.

T-levels were first announced in 2016, following the Sainsbury review of technical education.

They’re intended to set a new “gold standard” in training, and be on a par with A-levels.

According to the Department for Education’s response to its T-level consultation, published in May this year, it intends to introduce 13 courses in 2021 and a further nine in 2022 – with full delivery delayed until 2023.