Chris Claydon, CEO, JTL

Chris Claydon has a biography better suited to James Bond than to the chief executive of a training provider for building service engineers.

He has flown Apache military helicopters, briefed cabinet ministers on evacuations from the Arab Spring uprisings, and helped save lives by designing countermeasures to the roadside bombs used in Afghanistan. Oh, and he used to live in a castle.

That all happened in his previous life in the British Army, which he left in 2015 at the age of 50. Claydon spent the next seven years as chief executive of The Engineering Construction Industry Training Board (ECITB), the employer-led skills body for the engineering and construction workforce, where he honed his corporate skills and gleaned intelligence on what employers say they want.

That came in useful for his next and current role leading JTL, a charity providing advanced apprenticeships in electrical installation, engineering maintenance and mechanical engineering services.

An education, not skills system

On his first day at JTL in February, Claydon was keen to meet apprentices at the heart of the organisation. He visited the site of the refit of Deutsche Bank’s new London headquarters to meet some adult apprentices – one of whom, he recalls, was “on track to earn £75,000 this year”.

I express some astonishment at this figure.

“Go to the car park of any apprentice training centre where you’ve got electricians or welders, especially towards the end of their apprenticeship, and look at the cars knocking around,” he says. “These apprentices are in well-paid jobs.”

Claydon believes “many people” in the UK “do not understand” just how much such skilled labour jobs can pay. He blames this partly on schools.

When Claydon asks apprentices what careers advice they got at school, a “woefully low” number say their teachers encouraged them to do an apprenticeship.

Some of the problems lie in how government departments were carved up when responsibility for skills was handed to the Department for Education from the former Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.

He believes “the DfE is still very much focused on education, not skills. Now, [education secretary] Gillian Keegan and [skills minister] Robert Halfon do have a good skills focus, so maybe things will change. But, at the moment, the focus is still around schools.”

Another department name change might help matters. Claydon has suggested to DfE officials that they should “get into their cellars” where a sign might be lurking for the former Department for Education and Skill’ (which became defunct in 2007).

“I told them they could dust it off and reuse it… But they didn’t like even a joking assessment.”

Claydon also questions whether T Levels are the right solution for the country. While “we’ve not seen sufficient numbers to really understand whether it is the answer to what we need”, his concern is that they are “pitched at quite a high level”.

Chris Claydon

Explosive success

I ask Claydon whether he would have considered studying T Levels, had they been around when he was at school? The chief executive tells me not to ask him about his education. “People develop at different ages, let’s put it that way.”

Claydon joined the army at 18, starting in infantry roles including patrolling the streets of Northern Ireland. He later applied to become a helicopter pilot in the Army Air Corps, starting on the Gazelle and the Lynx before learning to fly the Apache attack – described by some as a “flying tank”.

But Claydon was keen to fly high in other ways in his career and grasped the opportunity to spend five years working for the Ministry of Defence on strategy. During the Arab Spring, he worked with the Cabinet Office, briefing ministers on plans to extract UK nationals from countries in conflict.

He also worked on projects around how to establish a presence in the Middle East and was very closely involved in a scheme to base the UK military east of Suez for the first time since the 1960s. It involved establishing a seaborne mine countermeasure force to provide guarantees of access to the Gulf.

Another job in which Claydon was very heavily involved was designing countermeasures to the improvised explosive devices that were killing and injuring so many soldiers in Afghanistan at the time. The devices, also known as roadside bombs, were being used “extensively and effectively” and it was “quite a challenge designing systems to overcome that threat”.

Of all his jobs in the military, this was the one that Claydon gained “most satisfaction” from because it resulted in casualty figures dropping.

King of the castle

But his final stint before leaving the military was perhaps even more impressive. During the day, he commanded a brigade of 4,500 across sites in the UK and South East Asia, delivering security, crisis response, training, logistics and infrastructure support to military forces and civilian emergency services. In his “evening and weekend job, quite bizarrely”, he was deputy constable of Dover Castle.

His role involved supporting the constable – at the time, Admiral of the Fleet Lord Boyce. Notable former constables include Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother and Sir Winston Churchill during the Second World War.

Claydon’s children enjoyed making the most of castle life when they came to visit him there, and he admits that “once the gates had closed, the whole castle was yours. For games, go-karting and teaching children to drive, it was wonderful.

Claydon has the “dubious distinction” of being the last full-time resident of Dover Castle in its 850-year history after cost-cutting measures saw the position disposed of. He insists, with a smile, that this has nothing to do with any parties he threw, and was “definitely not because I destroyed a piece of English Heritage property”.

Civilian life

Claydon now lives in a house (“not a castle”) in Hammersmith. The job leading ECITB piqued his interest because it involved “pulling together a workforce to deliver critical national infrastructure”, something he considers vital for the country.

“It’s not making the plastic toy that goes into a happy meal. People who do that [infrastructure] work should feel absolutely motivated and proud they are doing important things.”

But the shrinking domestic skilled labour market since Brexit, combined with a tight global market – “we’re all on the same timetable to net zero, everyone’s starting to build this infrastructure” – has created a “perfect storm” for the engineering and construction industry.

One of the biggest challenges is finding people to work on the country’s first nuclear power station to be built for a generation, Hinkley Point C in Somerset. The site’s owner EDF Energy is stumping up £24 million for 30,000 new training places for electricians, welders and pipe installers.

There is also HS2, which also requires thousands of electricians to lay cables.

At the moment, a contractor will only take on apprentices when the order book is filled. But it takes four years to train an apprentice electrician, for example.

“Unless you’ve got a lot of spare capacity in the system, you have this constant tension between, ‘I need it now’ and ‘But I can only get it when I’m paying for it’.”

Claydon believes the solution for large infrastructure projects is to develop a model of “forward funding”, to “pump prime” the system of skills provision. He provides the example of a £500 million project for carbon capture in Teesside.

If those funding the project could provide £5 million to train local people up in advance in the core skills required of welding, pipe fitting and electrics, while some may go on to work for other companies by the time the project comes to fruition, at least those skills would be “more readily accessible to meet the requirements”.

On a project of that size, Claydon sees £5 million as “nothing”, and the investors will have “helped de-risk the project”.

“It’s hitting their ESG [environmental, social, governance] goals, so there’s a win-win. But how you persuade people is the challenge.”

But that is “unfinished business”, which he has left to his successor at ECITB.

Military skills

Claydon believes the soft skills he learnt in the military around “conflict resolution” and “tact and diplomacy” have been invaluable in his roles since. He recalls a position he undertook at the United Nations headquarters in Sierra Leone, which was a “tricky juggling act between the military and civilian mission, and bringing people together to reach agreements on issues which could really scale out of control if you weren’t careful”.

The importance of training – now central to his role – was also intrinsic to his role as a helicopter pilot, where he was “constantly training and being evaluated”.

While in the military “you are all of one company – you define a mission and work towards it” – but being chief executive of a training provider involves “negotiating and navigating between people with different strategies and agendas. It’s harder to get a more coherent line going forward around issues.”

Electric dreams to be realised

JTL, graded ‘good’ by Ofsted at its last inspection in 2017, is currently training around 8,500 apprentices and taking on around 2,300 new starters this year. That “inevitably places strain on the system” by requiring more qualified engineers to teach and assess.

“It’s that age-old conundrum, that the trainer gets paid less than the site operative. But we need the site operative to become the trainer. You can see the fragilities in that system.”

But, while there are “good numbers” of apprentices signing up, it is “not going to be enough” to meet the economy’s needs. He also believes there is a “north-south divide” in the apprenticeships market, with “people understanding the value of skilled jobs in the north” but a “wider, more competent and competitive jobs market” down south.

“You generally get more applicants further north. So you are competing harder in the south, where there are very high-demand areas.”

JTL’s electrical apprentices are the ones at the forefront of the country’s net zero ambitions. But Claydon believes the industry needs to do more to promote its role in saving the planet to the next generation in order to attract new recruits.

“Joining photovoltaic cells and bringing solar farms on stream, smart housing and all those smart technologies saving energy in the commercial environment, installing offshore wind turbines – all of these things are contributing to reducing our carbon emissions. We’re playing a vital role on that journey.”

Babington CEO steps down

The boss of one of England’s largest training providers has stepped down with immediate effect.

Babington Business College confirmed today that chief executive David Marsh has left the company after almost five years at the helm.

A message to stakeholders, seen by FE Week, said Marsh’s decision to leave was due to “personal reasons”. Companies House shows he set up his own consultancy firm last week.

Marsh’s departure comes months after Babington was sold by RJD Partners in December 2022 to Unigestion, a Switzerland-based private equity firm.

A spokesperson for Babington said its board of directors is “actively working to appoint a new chief executive”.

The company’s “executive committee” members – chief operating officer Jen Bramley, chief learning officer Rachel Kay, and chief financial officer Steve McMullan – will take over the day-to-day leadership of the organisation.

Marsh is a recent former board member of the Association of Employment and Learning Providers and a co-founder of the St Martin’s Group – another membership body for training providers.

He started his career in education as a teacher before spending almost six years at Babcock International Group where he was a director in the company’s training business.

He then spent two years as head of academies at British Gas before becoming managing director of Capita’s apprenticeship and training business, and then moving to Babington in October 2018.

Babington, which was founded almost 50 years ago, is currently rated ‘good’ by Ofsted and trains thousands of apprentices and adult learners each year in areas like accountancy, administration, management and employability skills.

The provider acquired the apprenticeships division of PeoplePlus, which had described that part of its business as “loss-making”, in 2020. Babington then shot up to the fifth biggest provider in terms of apprenticeship starts in England in 2021/22, recording 4,420 according to government data.

Babington is yet to file accounts for 2022, but its financial statements for 2021 show turnover reached £26.1 million in 2021 with a profit after tax of £3.4 million. However, Babington’s holding company, Project Sinatra Topco Ltd – now called Babington Managed Services Topco Ltd – showed a loss of £2.5 million in the same year.

Sixth form college delays closure after backlash from parents, union and MP

Leaders at a sixth form college who announced “abrupt” plans to shut this summer and leave dozens of students in limbo have bowed to pressure and committed to delaying closure by a year, admitting they “got it wrong”.

Queen Alexandra Sixth Form College in Wallsend said this week that it would close at the end of the academic year because plummeting student numbers over the last three years had left it “no longer financially viable”.

It left 49 AS students in the first year of their A-levels scrambling to sort provision for next year. But following outcry from students, parents, Tynemouth MP Alan Campbell and the University and College Union, the decision has been postponed by a year.

The sixth form, which is part of the Tyne Coast College group, has now committed to seeing through the first-year students and instead close in July 2024.

Following a crisis meeting between chief executive Lindsey Whiterod and the chair of governors this morning, Whiterod admitted it had been the wrong call to close so hastily.

“The response to our announcement to cease A-level provision has been overwhelming. It is clear that the students absolutely love studying at the QA and the response from parents, students and previous students has been incredible. The chair and I have reflected on our decision and, simply put, we got it wrong,” Whiterod explained.

“Myself and the chair can only apologise for the stress that this has created to parents, students, teaching and support staff who I must personally commend and thank for how well they have carried on supporting our learners after the initial announcement.”

The college said that it wanted to make the announcement as soon as possible to minimise disruption to students preparing for exams.

The initial announcement this week had put 11 members of staff at risk of losing their jobs, and an application process of voluntary redundancy had already begun, as well as endeavours to finds alternative roles for staff under threat.

Whiterod confirmed the result of the fresh announcement will “not create efficiencies elsewhere”.

Staff at the college had been hastily attempting to find alternative sites for the first-year students to complete their studies for next year, which had included forming individualised spreadsheets for students based on what they were studying and where they could be matched, and plans to sort one-to-one meetings to discuss options.

Today’s update means that will no longer be necessary.

On Thursday, the college said it made the announcement of the impending closure at the earliest opportunity, but it attracted widespread ire, including from Tynemouth MP Alan Campbell who questioned how “abruptly” the decision had been made.

“I fully share the concerns that have been raised with me and have today been in contact with the principal of Tyne Coast College, the local authority and the minister of state for higher education to see what can be done to address this issue,” he said before the latest announcement.

UCU regional support official Jon Bryan added: “Staff, students and the local community are rightly furious that their local sixth form college will no longer cater to A-level students. Ending A-level provision would see young people in Wallsend lose key educational opportunities and the decision must be reversed.”

In its original announcement, a spokesperson for Tyne Coast College said it was a “challenging” time for the sector, with the decision coming after a review of its curriculum.

“Despite trying to grow the provision with new A-level options in the 2022/23 academic year, sadly we did not see growth,” the spokesperson added.

It is understood the sixth form currently has 49 AS-level students and 66 second-year students. FE Week has asked the college to clarify how much its student numbers have declined by in the last few years.

Tyne Coast College accounts for 2021/22 indicated a £3.4 million deficit for the year before other gains and losses, however £2.5 million of that was because of changes to the Tyne and Wear local government pension scheme.

Its adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation) was reported at £1.3 million.

Tyne Coast College principal Lindsey Whiterod had previously been a national leader in FE up to March last year – a programme that sits alongside the FE commissioner’s office who work with senior leaders to provide strategic mentoring and advice on improvement plans for the sector.

Rail provider terminated amid combined authority funding dispute

A rail engineering training provider is set to close after a combined authority suddenly terminated its adult education contract amid a dispute over “unsatisfactory” funding claims.

GNR Training has been left effectively bankrupt after Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority (CPCA) stopped paying the provider in February after accusations of “serious non-compliance” with its rules were made.

But GNR, a family-run business that delivers short adult-education courses, has strongly refuted the authority’s allegations and even claims the provider has itself been underpaid by officials over the past three years.

GNR is now attempting to rally its local MP to intervene in what it claims to be a “stitch-up” situation in which it was “set up to fail”.

More than 30 rail engineering learners have been left in limbo as a result of the stand-off.

‘Unsatisfactory’ use of funds

CPCA began contracting with GNR in the 2020/21 academic year and entered into a direct contract worth £82,000, having spent a few years providing freelance teaching for other providers.

The Sheffield-based firm opened a new training centre in Peterborough and delivered a fresh contract the following year worth £477,000 in 2021/22, before securing a five-year contract, which began in August 2022, worth millions.

It delivered a 21-week level 3 diploma in engineering technology, as well as previously teaching a 12-week level 2 diploma in rail engineering, but the rug was pulled when CPCA terminated the agreement in April.

The termination followed an audit of GNR, commissioned by CPCA and carried out by Mazars, between September 2022 and the end of January 2023, which concluded there had been an “unsatisfactory use of funds”.

The audit report, seen by FE Week, said that there was £95,862.17 overpaid by CPCA for National Skills Fund (NSF) money, with just over £53,000 in adult education budget cash claimed over the agreed contract value by GNR.

The breach of contract notice said that achievement payments had been claimed in relation to free courses for jobs (part of the NSF), “without any evidence to support such claims”.

CPCA has now invoiced GNR for £84,539 to recover free courses for jobs funding.

In addition, CPCA said that GNR had failed to notify the authority of a change in circumstances, namely a suspension of direct claim status (DCS). DCS allows centres to claim certification of learners without waiting for external quality assurance.

The agreed contract for 2021/22 totalled £477,640, but GNR claimed £529,120 on its individualised learner record.

In a response to a Freedom of Information request by GNR, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough said: “The combined authority will only pay up to the contract value, irrespective of claims made via the ILR, unless an agreement has been reached to vary and increase the contract value.”

‘Set up to fail’

But GNR has hit back at the authority, claiming that it has been underpaid to the tune of about £110,000.

The provider asserted that the contract value did not account for CPCA uplift payments for learners.

GNR claims those uplifts included a flat £600 per learner because they were considered required skills for the area, as well as area and disadvantage uplifts that were based on learners’ circumstances and calculated as a multiplier.

GNR claimed it was “set up to fail” because CPCA had set a target number of learners that, if achieved, would exceed the contract value in 2021/22.

Rachael Bull from GNR told FE Week: “The need for rail people is phenomenal, it is off the chart. Now there is a training company that is wiped off the face of the planet – that was training good engineers that had jobs to go to – the industry as a whole suffers.”

GNR disputed CPCA’s claims that there was no evidence for free courses for jobs learners, saying that it did provide evidence and was unclear why it was not accepted.

Furthermore, internal quality assurance documents between the awarding body EAL and GNR, seen by FE Week, suggested GNR did have DCS for its level 3 offering.

The provider has also contested the audit findings. It said the NSF overpayment was because CPCA believed that, without DCS, the certificates were void and therefore claiming for learners who had not completed. On the AEB claim, GNR insisted that a variation in the contract agreed by the authority wasn’t taken into consideration.

A GNR FOI request also showed that only about £37,000 of the £94,368.91 in completion payments had actually been paid by CPCA.

Bull said the firm has not received payment since February and, had it known of an intent to cease its contract, could have completed learners and found additional contracts elsewhere.

Multiple attempts to see reconciled accounts to determine which completions had been paid for had allegedly fallen on deaf ears.

She added: “If they [CPCA] had concerns about our performance, why did they waste more taxpayer money on giving us a prime contract only to end it in four months and strand the learners?”

Rallying support

GNR contacted the Education and Skills Funding Agency (ESFA) in a bid to investigate, but said the ESFA confirmed the matter was for CPCA to deal with.

Peterborough MP Paul Bristow did not respond to FE Week’s requests for comment.

CPCA said it was unable to comment as the GNR case was an “ongoing matter”.

GNR and CPCA are due to meet today (Friday) to further discuss the dispute.

UK team for EuroSkills 2023 finals announced

Twenty “elite” apprentices and students from the UK will head to Poland this autumn to compete against the best young trades people Europe has to offer at the EuroSkills finals.

Talented UK students in disciplines such as hairdressing, joinery, cooking, restaurant service, plumbing and web development will go up against their European peers in Gdańsk from September 5 to 9, with the competition encompassing 600 young learners from 32 member countries.

Following top ten positions from UK entrants in last year’s WorldSkills finals, Team UK organisers confirmed the UK will be entering the digital construction and robot systems integration categories for the European competition for the first time.

Lucy Yelland, a Siemens apprentice who will represent Team UK in mechatronics, said: “The training so far has been tough but really enjoyable.”

Ben Love, who is also an apprentice with Siemens and competing in the mechatronics category, added: “As an apprentice, I never thought I would be saying that I would be representing the UK in Europe.”

Tyler Lewis – a student at Harrow, Richmond and Uxbridge Colleges – won gold in the national finals, and said: “Now to be able to say I’m representing the UK in Europe is just the best feeling. For now, I’m focused on preparing for the competition as I know the standard will be really high.”

Competitors, who come from all four nations of the UK, have been through a thorough selection process that included taking part in the national competitions. They will be eyeing a place on the WorldSkills finals stage, set to take place in France next year.

Event organisers said they expect more than 100,000 spectators from Poland and across Europe to watch the EuroSkills events, after disrupted years caused by the Covid-19 pandemic.

Ben Blackledge, interim chief executive at WorldSkills UK, said it would provide a “valuable mechanism” in which to benchmark students’ skills against European standards.

“This will be a life-enhancing opportunity for these remarkable young people who will be competing as Team UK. They are the embodiment not only of the characteristics that we should aspire for in a young workforce, but for the UK Government’s ambitions for global Britain too,” Blackledge said.

“They are leaders of their generation – and will inspire many more to walk in their footsteps. I wish them the best of luck.”

Teija Ripattila, chair of the board for WorldSkills Europe, said the event will showcase “the highest standards of excellence which motivates more young people to develop technical and vocational skills”.

Robert Halfon, the minister for skills, apprenticeships and higher education, said EuroSkills helped learners achieve their career goals.

He added: “Celebrating Britain’s excellence in skills isn’t just good for business and the economy, it makes a real difference to how vocational education and apprenticeships are perceived, raise their status and support our brilliant further education sector.”

People pay billions more for training than employers and government, research claims

People are spending billions of pounds on their own learning – more than the government or employers – according to new research.

Analysis published today by Learning and Work Institute claims that learners invest £7.3 billion of their own money and £55 billion worth of their own time in education each year – well in excess of the £42 billion annual investment by employers, and the £6.8 billion in tax reliefs and learning provision by the government.

It equates to £323 per learner studying an average 223 hours annually, the report said.

The research also exposed the postcode lottery of participation in learning, due to the age and pre-existing qualifications of the population. Participation in London was highest at 56 per cent compared to 36 per cent in the south east.

The report noted that learning on apps such as Duolingo and online provision such as FutureLearn had risen in recent years, driven by technology and people’s preferences, with the training sector needing to adapt to the convenience those offer.

Stephen Evans, chief executive of the Learning and Work Institute, said the current landscape was “too patchy” but both a mix of traditional classroom learning and flexible online options would be needed.

“One of the biggest barriers to learning that we see regularly is fitting learning around the work and home life, and these sorts of things can really help to do that,” he said.

“I think what we are arguing for really is to have different ways into learning to better suit people. Sometimes that is classroom-based, traditionally scheduled, sometimes it is an app, sometimes it is a mix of the two.”

Data on individual investment in education was an estimate taken from the institute’s adult participation in learning survey, in which respondents were asked how much they had paid for the training and the number of hours per week.

However, it was noted that some participants might have included things such as university tuition fees while others did not.

The report has called for new learning accounts for all adults, with a £5,000 contribution to course fees, and enhanced maintenance support so that out-of-work adults can study full-time for up to 12 months rather than 12 weeks as is currently allowed on the Department for Work and Pensions’ Train and Progress scheme.

The report said that the current landscape of government support, such as advanced learner loans and the planned lifetime loan entitlement due to launch in 2025, is too complicated, and called for a “lifelong learning entitlement” to effectively bring different support streams under one umbrella.

In addition, the Learning and Work Institute wants the right to request time to train for those in work to be extended. Currently, only employees in organisations with 250 or more staff members have a right to request time to train, and only for learning directly linked to their job.

The institute wants that to be extended to all learners, cover all accredited learning and to become a right to train, not just a right to request, for larger employers.

On its proposals for a one-year unpaid career break, the institute said people would remain employed but be entitled to a maintenance loan from the government, but would not be paid by their employer during that time to reduce the burden on employers.

Evans said not providing flexibility for learning “holds back” the economy as well as the life chances and wellbeing of adults, explaining that the investment in learning from individuals is “underplayed”.

He added: “Our analysis shows huge inequalities between demographic groups and geographic areas that are holding us all back. Part of the reason is that policy doesn’t sufficiently support people to learn. We need much better support with the costs of learning, good-quality careers advice, and joined-up national and local action to promote learning.”

A spokesperson from the Department for Education said: “We are boosting investment in skills by £3.8 billion over this parliament – working with employers to create more apprenticeships, offering more skills bootcamps and creating a new lifelong loan entitlement from 2025 to make it easier for people to learn throughout their lifetime.

1 in 10 established apprenticeships fail to recruit a single apprentice

Nearly one in ten established apprenticeship standards have failed to enrol a single apprentice, FE Week can reveal.

FE Week analysed starts data for the 668 currently “available for delivery” apprenticeship standards and found that 58, which have been approved for over a year, have yet to recruit (full table below).

Despite passing the Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education’s (IfATE) various layers for approval – including tests for employer demand – leading employers have laid the blame on a mix of complex bureaucracy and risk-averse training providers.

Industry insiders also report that employers in some sectors are turning their backs on apprenticeships and reverting to more traditional courses because of the requirements placed on them by the current system.

Among the list of zero-start standards are the level 6 in youth work, the level 2 in network operations and niche occupations such as the level 3 assistant puppet maker, level 3 knitted product manufacturing technician and the forensic collision investigator degree apprenticeship.

Eight standards without any starts have been “approved for delivery” for over five years. The level 3 live event rigger apprenticeship, for example, was approved in December 2015 and apprenticeships for organ builders, pest control technicians and watchmakers have supposedly been available for five years but haven’t enrolled a single recruit.

A spokesperson from IfATE told FE Week: “It’s important to first give an apprenticeship time to bed in. However, ‘no or low starts’ is one of the criteria we use to prioritise the review of a particular apprenticeship and its delivery and, if the data indicates a delivery problem, we will aim to address it.

“If this is not possible, we will ultimately withdraw the apprenticeship. Such action requires careful consideration and resource, which we balance against the urgency of reviewing and revising apprenticeships with starts which may be impacting on learners, particularly where the withdrawal rate is high.”

Our analysis shows that the institute has retired ten previously approved apprenticeships that didn’t recruit.

Questions have now been raised about whether the institute has given too much power to employers and whether it keeps a close enough watch on the demand for apprenticeships in the economy.

How to get approved

To get an apprenticeship approved, employer groups, still referred to as trailblazers, follow a process overseen by IfATE. This involves providing evidence of the demand for specific skills training in their industry.

There’s even an expectation, set out in IfATE guidance, that employers involved in the development of an apprenticeship will themselves take on apprentices once it is approved, but this is clearly not enforced.

Proposals from trailblazer employers then go through the relevant IfATE route panel, made up of industry experts who “make sure the apprenticeships are high-quality and meet the needs of employers”.

The institute said it tests whether an occupation proposed for an apprenticeship is in demand by employers by “comparing the occupational profile with job advertisements and recruitment materials”, and “reviewing evidence that the occupation is in demand from a range of employers, using similar occupation/job titles and descriptions”.

The final hurdle is the IfATE approvals and funding committee, but the apprenticeship is only fully signed-off once both the standard and end-point assessment plan has been approved, the secretary of state for education has agreed to a funding band, and an end-point assessment organisation has “committed” to delivering the EPA.

It’s not me, it’s you

Several employers told FE Week there are live discussions in their industries on whether apprenticeships are now the right way to train the next generation of skilled workers in their industries.

The British Engineering Services Association (BESA), a trade body, got three apprenticeship standards over the line for its industry. In fact, it was one of the first.

Its level 2 building services engineering ductwork installer and level 3 building services engineering ductwork craftsperson standards have recruited fewer than 50 apprentices since they were approved in 2017.

Meanwhile, its building services engineering ventilation hygiene technician, also approved in 2017, “should never have been an apprenticeship in the first place”, according to Helen Yeulet, BESA’s director of training and skills, and “wouldn’t be approved if it was submitted today. It’s not got the content.”

All three of those standards are now going through IfATE’s withdrawal process.

Yeulet told FE Week how, back in 2017, employers were encouraged by the promise of apprenticeships, “employers like a freebie” but hadn’t fully clocked the level of commitment needed on their part.

The industry is reviewing how it wants to train its workers. “We are now delivering short courses with encouraging uptake … but they’re not interested in apprenticeships.”

Historic England, which saw through standards for historic environment advisers and cultural heritage conservation technicians, neither of which have recorded any starts to date, told FE Week it has commissioned research to better understand the needs of employers in its sector.

The findings from employers cite a lack of resources in the sector to support apprenticeships, a lack of available training providers and a “lack of an apprenticeship culture” within the sector.

And a representative from the fashion industry, which did not want to be named, told FE Week that it was working with employers who “prefer the stability and certainty of traditional diploma courses, even though they’ve paid into the levy”.

The institute has defended its processes but admitted that the availability of training providers and end-point assessment organisations could prevent an approved apprenticeship from taking off.

An IfATE spokesperson told FE Week: “The development of any apprenticeship is an employer-led process and, as part of this, we seek assurances of likely demand from the relevant employer group before agreeing to its development. This is then sense-checked as part of our approvals process, including by the relevant sectoral route panel.

“Issues can arise that cause apprenticeships to have no (or lower than expected) take-up. These issues range from the content of the apprenticeship itself to delivery issues such as provider or EPAO availability, to wider-ranging issues such as the impact of Covid and the economic climate.”

‘I’m a blacksmith, not a publicist’

Micro and heritage industries have also struggled to make the system work for them. Among the list of apprenticeships that recorded no starts are standards for blacksmiths, bookbinders, watchmakers, organ builders, stained glass craftspeople and assistant puppet makers.

David Poole, education officer at the Worshipful Company of Clockmakers, has been involved in the watchmaking apprenticeship employers’ group since it started working on getting the standard approved through 2016/17 and is still working to make it a success.

For Poole, finding and retaining a training provider that can deliver the specialist niche training needed for small numbers of apprenticeships has been difficult. While there have been a handful of starts on the apprenticeship – though these don’t appear in DfE figures – job losses during the pandemic made continuing the course unviable and the programme closed.

“The issue of delivering a niche apprenticeship where there might be a dozen apprentices a year is the government bureaucracy that’s involved and identifying a lead provider that you can work with,” Poole said. “It’s always too difficult for them to proceed.”

Poole told FE Week that IfATE is “looking into this problem” and he hopes “there’ll be a greater focus on the problems of delivering tiny apprenticeships”.

“It’s very sad,” Poole added. “There should be an answer for very small niche areas of employment.”

Finding a specialist training provider that can take the financial risk of small cohorts is also an issue facing Adrian Legge, who leads the employer group for the four-year level 3 blacksmith apprenticeship. The standard was approved in February 2020 but a combination of Brexit and Covid has “knocked the confidence of employers to invest in training”, he said.

“We looked at nominating a single off-the-job training centre, but they need a certain amount of trainees to make it viable for them. It’s a case of trying to persuade a training centre to run something where the returns are likely to be quite low and the risks are quite high. There’s this level of uncertainty involved,” Legge said.

Legge, who is self-employed and works on the apprenticeship voluntarily, told FE Week he thinks he’s personally invested “thousands of pounds” representing the industry and trying to get the apprenticeship off the ground.

On the employer group he leads, Legge said: “We’ve got several directions to give this apprenticeship a push, but we’re all pretty much entirely self-employed volunteers. We could do with a more concrete support package around advertising. You know, I’m a blacksmith, I’m not a publicist.”

Universities, as well as training providers, can also take some convincing to take on the risk of delivering new or niche apprenticeships.

Poole described the “threat of an invasion from Ofsted” as turning off the universities he has tried to engage.

Stewart Edmondson, from the UK Electronic Skills Foundation, led the development of the level 7 electronic systems principal engineer. He has found that universities are reluctant to engage without evidence of demand from employers, “but there isn’t demand because employers won’t commit to something that doesn’t exist”, Edmondson told FE Week.

Edmondson, whose standard was approved in 2019, also takes aim at the Institute’s “very difficult” processes and lack of ongoing support for the standards it approves.

“They [IfATE] say there’s been no starts and, unless something happens, they’re going to withdraw it. But they don’t help. The level 7 was supposed to be available for employers to use as part of their development programme for graduate engineers.”

A spokesperson for Health Education England told FE Week it’s three no-start degree apprenticeships – physician associate, clinical dental technician and arts therapist – have not recruited due to “complex processes around course validation, procurement, approvals and other matters”.

Setting standards

For Tom Bewick, chief executive at the Federation of Awarding Bodies, this all points to the need for IfATE to be more demanding on what it expects from employers.

“The Institute appears to have developed these standards in quite a rigid and highly technocratic way, without first assessing their real employer demand,” Bewick said. “In Germany and Switzerland, firms via industry bodies have to agree to take on a minimum number of apprentices before the standards setting bodies will even begin a developmental process.”

The Association of Employment and Learning Providers (AELP), which represents training providers, is also in favour of consolidating standards.

Jane Hickie, chief executive, said: “AELP is fully supportive of an employer-led approach to apprenticeships. However, the proliferation of standards has had an impact on the ability for timely reviews of content and funding to take place.

“Alongside consolidating the existing portfolio into a ‘core and pathway’ type approach to manage demand for niche provision, a more sensible approach would be to limit new standards unless there is evidence of proper demand and supply. This would allow limited resources to be used to focus instead on completing reviews of existing standards more quickly.”

A Department for Education spokesperson said: “It is for employers to tell us which apprenticeships they need for their businesses. IfATE routinely reviews standards with low numbers of starts and will take action where necessary, reflecting current and future demand.”

AoC doubles down on refusal to make college pay proposal

The Association of Colleges is standing firm on its refusal to make a pay proposal for next year, as doing so will “let the government off the hook”.

AoC chief David Hughes is also calling on unions to halt strike action during the crucial exam period while negotiations continue.

The latest meeting between the five unions from the National Joint Forum (NJF) and AoC today resulted in the association doubling down on its decision not to offer a pay recommendation for 2023/24, explaining that a 15 per cent demand was a “perfectly reasonable” ask but colleges could not afford “anywhere near what the unions are asking for”.

Following the first meeting last month, the AoC took the unprecedented decision not to make an offer unless ministers intervened to stump up more cash.

The association met with the education secretary Gillian Keegan and skills minister Robert Halfon to make the case for more money in recent weeks, who have “heard this message” but said that the Department for Education will now need to convince Treasury.

Hughes said: “Making a pay recommendation now would essentially let the government off the hook by either making a recommendation that colleges cannot afford or one that is far from adequate.

“We recognise the enormous pressure on staff caused by high inflation and the cost of living and that is why we are making the case to the Treasury and the DfE for a package of measures to increase college staff pay.”

Hughes referenced the teacher recruitment and retention crisis, and the pay chasm between FE teachers and their equivalents in schools, explaining that there is not enough money to ensure pay at least matches the offer to schools.”

The School Teachers’ Review Body is not due to report on its final proposal until July.

Hughes added: “In the meantime, I would urge union branches not to schedule strike action which aims to disrupt students as they come into college for their exams this summer. This is already a stressful time of year for students. Asking students to walk through picket lines when they are calmly trying to prepare for their exams is unfair and unnecessary and can be avoided by the unions.”

Asked by FE Week whether the AoC was passing the buck onto its paying members to decide by themselves what the pay award should be, Hughes said he was instead “putting the responsibility where it lies which is directly and squarely with the government”.

This year, the five unions – the University and College Union (UCU), Unison, National Education Union (NEU), GMB and Unite – have asked for an inflation-busting 15.4 per cent increase – the 13.4 per cent retail price index inflation increase from January plus 2 per cent.

It has also called for “significant movement” towards “meaningful national agreements to address workloads in colleges”, sector-wide agreement on a new national bargaining framework and a new national contract for FE staff.

Last year, the AoC made a 2.5 per cent offer compared to the forum’s ask for 10 per cent.

A statement from the joint FE trade unions said: “Its deeply disappointing to report that the AoC failed to make any recommendation on pay.

“While it is a fact that FE in England is underfunded, employers can and do make choices regarding what they prioritise to invest in, and for far too long employers have deprioritised investing in staff pay.”

The unions added: “The AoC position is to a large extent a function of the broken national bargaining arrangements in FE, where pay increases are only recommended, unlike in schools or sixth form where pay increases are implemented.

“We challenged the AoC to publicly state their support for the principle of binding national negotiations; regrettably, they did not agree to our proposal. It is the joint trade union’s view that the sector desperately needs a new settlement which covers funding, staff pay, negotiating frameworks and workloads. The reclassification of FE provides the opportunity for the AoC and the DfE to work with us to reset FE. Pressing repeat is not working.”

Land-for-homes sale ‘essential’ to keep college from closing

Beleaguered Brooklands College will be forced to close if plans for a major redevelopment that includes selling land for more than 300 new homes falls through, its principal has admitted.

A planning application was submitted to Elmbridge Borough Council yesterday seeking permission for a project that will pump £45 million into the Weybridge college.

The cash is vital in securing the college’s future as it would be used to repay a £25 million debt to the government that is being demanded by the Education and Skills Funding Agency (ESFA) following an apprenticeship subcontracting scandal, which was uncovered by FE Week several years ago.

If approved, the redevelopment scheme will deliver 320 new homes, including 128 “affordable homes” for local families, a new sports centre, a community hub and public access to 12 hectares of woodland.

Brooklands College principal Christine Ricketts said: “These plans are absolutely essential to securing the future of the college. Not only will they put the college on a stable, financial footing, they will upgrade our teaching buildings and provide us with a state-of-the-art campus to provide the highest standards of training and vocational learning.”

The college, which has failed to file accounts since 2018, recently agreed a repayment plan for the debt with the ESFA, which allows three years to secure a planning approval.

A spokesperson for the college said that without the sale of the land for residential development, the college “would be in an insolvent position, which could result in its forced closure and the land sold to a developer”.