Stop construction skills training duplication, charity urges government

Duplication of construction skills training criteria being developed by separate sector bodies should be streamlined to ensure the industry can meet demand for an estimated 250,000 workers by 2030, an education charity has argued.

In a report that calls on the government to come up with a “long term realistic strategic plan” for the construction industry’s workforce, NOCN has raised concerns that there are three separate standards programmes and training levies for the sector.

This includes standards, occupational maps and competency frameworks overseen by the Institute for Apprenticeship and Technical Education (IfATE), the Construction Industry Training Board, and steering groups that report to the new Building Safety Regulator – set up in last year in response to the Grenfell Tower fire.

NOCN says the new government, the replacement of IfATE with Skills England and the new building regulator are an opportunity to combine the three into a “single programme of work”.

This would help address existing skills gaps in construction and a huge demand for new workers, estimated by the CITB to reach 250,000 by 2030.

Without an increase in construction workers, who are in high demand globally, the government could struggle to meet its target of 1.5 million new homes over the next five years.

NOCN chief executive Graham Hasting Evans told FE Week: “There’s massive duplication, and then the changing government, creation of a quango and the ongoing Grenfell recommendations is an opportunity, and I think it should run by one industry-led body.

“It opens up the opportunity to resolve these streams of work and pull them all together, so they’re in one place – more efficient and more effective.”

In NOCN’s view, development of standards and management of the apprenticeship levy, CITB levy and the Engineering Construction Industry Training Board’s (ECITB) industrial training levy should also all be delegated to a single, industry run body such as the Construction Leadership Council.

The charity also argues that this could help reverse a decline in construction workers entering the industry since the apprenticeship levy was introduced, as employers, particularly smaller businesses, are held back by “inflexible and bureaucratic” rules.

The government should also “publish and implement” recommendations from a government review into the effectiveness of two industry training boards, which is yet to be published despite being completed under the Conservative government in 2023.

More than a year later, a date for the review’s publication is yet to be confirmed.

Rosalind Thorpe, director of education and standards at the Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB), said: “CIOB has long argued for changes to be made to the way in which industry training standards are set. The industry needs one set of standards which everyone buys into. 

“The apprenticeship levy and the CITB levy are not working as intended and we have not seen the right number of skilled people with the necessary competencies to work in the construction industry, particularly as it embarks on a new era of building safety. 

“In our recent pre-election manifesto, we pointed out that much of the apprenticeship levy fund has been left unspent since its introduction and the number of new apprenticeships has failed to reach government targets. 

“CIOB has called for funding to be focussed more on missing skills rather than purely on apprenticeships – something we feel could be achieved by adjusting the current levy arrangements.”

David Nash, director of strategy and policy at the ECITB, said: “ECITB levy arrangements are widely supported by our levy payers with 85% voting in favour at the last consultation round.

“Whilst many of the challenges are similar, the skills and occupational requirements of our industry – which services the energy and industrial processing sectors – are quite different to those faced by the wider construction industry.”

Read the full NOCN report here.

Charity’s online skills bootcamps applauded by Ofsted

A charity providing online skills bootcamps for adults facing barriers to employment has been judged ‘outstanding’ by Ofsted.

Generation You Employed, a global charity set up in the UK in 2019, was given top marks after inspectors heard of the “transformational effect” that studying there has on many learners’ lives.

At the time of its first-ever full inspection in August, the charity had 35 learners studying the retrofit advisor skills bootcamp, 39 studying data engineering and 26 studying IT support. All training is delivered online.

In Generation’s report published this morning, the watchdog found most learners successfully complete their programmes and gain a job interview.

“Learners have an excellent understanding of how their skills bootcamp programme can lead to paid, sustainable employment,” inspectors said.

Ofsted’s inspection remit was expanded to skills bootcamps in April 2023 after a thematic review found inconsistent quality of training and poor government oversight. The programme is worth over half a billion pounds between 2020 and 2025.

The training courses can last up to four months and are supposed to end with a guaranteed interview with an employer.

Michael Houlihan, CEO of Generation, said the charity was involved in the pilot skills bootcamps before the government rolled out the initiative and will continue to develop new programmes after the glowing report.

“We seek to identify, enrol, and then support people who face barriers to employment, supporting them into jobs, whilst doing so with very high success rates. Doing so is complex but creates very real and meaningful impact for the people we support,” he told FE Week.

“The reality of supporting people who are often in complicated situations and are facing a range of barriers, it is not a one size fits all approach. 

“This is all comes down to a huge testament and acknowledgement of the team’s effort to apply with huge amounts of expertise, diligence and care, supporting those learners in a way which realises fantastic outcomes for them.”

High outcomes

Ofsted’s report said that Generation’s learners arrive for online lessons promptly, dressed appropriately and “eager to learn” and teachers use online chat facilities “skilfully” to check learners’ understanding.

Inspectors found students grow confidence “rapidly” and staff review challenging goals regularly.

“They also help learners to acquire the conviction, drive and resilience to overcome the barriers that have often previously held them back,” the report said.

Ofsted praised leaders for “carefully” designing programmes with employers and partner organisations and including “highly valued” qualifications that nearly all learners pass.

In the retrofit advisor course, for example, learners take an industry qualification as part of the bootcamp.

“This contributes to most learners securing high-quality, sustainable jobs,” the report said.

Staff were commended for being industry experts and ordering the curriculum carefully and checking what learners knew before starting the programme. 

Inspectors said: “For example, data engineering learners initially develop their analytical thinking using programming languages, such as Python. They then use these skills to resolve simulated business issues as part of a team. This helps learners quickly master new skills and knowledge.” 

In the governance section, Ofsted said the board of trustees used their insight to support and challenge leaders “very effectively”.

Inspectors said: “They ask questions and review data to assure themselves that Generation continues to focus on those learners who face the greatest challenges. In this way, they ensure that Generation continues to achieve its vision and makes a positive impact on learners and wider society.”

Houlihan told FE Week that the charity is due to launch a solar panel installer program in response to the “pace of change in industry” particularly in the sectors it’s involved in: technology, green skills, and health and care.

Merging London college appoints new principal

A London college that plans to merge with the only Ofsted ‘inadequate’ sixth form college in the country has appointed a new principal.

Jamie Purser (pictured) will take over as Newham College’s top boss on January 1, 2025 as Paul Stephen retires at the end of December after seven years at the helm.

By this time the college expects to have taken on the troubled Newham Sixth Form College (NewVIc), which has been without a permanent leader since last October.

Purser has been deputy principal at Newham College for the past four years. He has also been acting principal at NewVIc since June 3.

Merger date set

Today’s announcement revealed the two colleges plan to merge on November 1, 2024, adding NewVIc’s 2,400 learners to Newham College’s 10,000-plus student roster.

The merger comes after NewVIc became the only sixth form college in the country to hold education watchdog Ofsted’s lowest possible judgment and was put into formal intervention by the government earlier this year.

The last time NewVIc had a permanent principal was last October, until former boss Mandeep Gill went on sick leave. Susanne Davies ran the college as interim principal when Ofsted inspectors posted a scathing report in April.

Ofsted pointed out how “staffing issues, ineffective teaching and administrative errors” were causing significant disruption to learners’ education.

Staff had previously told FE Week they planned to strike for 30 days in 2023 during the busy exam period amid a toxic battle with leaders over staff cuts and high workloads.

The college’s chair, Martin Rosner, also stepped down in March this year.

After the Ofsted report, NewVIc told FE Week it was exploring a merger with neighbouring Newham College, rated ‘good’ by Ofsted, as it has “demonstrable strengths in the areas Ofsted identified as areas for development at NewVIc”.

Jamie Purser said: “I am pleased and very proud to be appointed as the next principal and CEO of Newham College. It’s a privilege to lead an institution that has such a transformative educational impact. 

“I look forward to embracing new opportunities, continuing the college’s traditions of excellence, aspiration and inclusion, and remaining at the heart of the communities we serve, supporting them to thrive and succeed.”

Newham College chair Paul Jackson said: “Under Paul Stephen’s leadership, the college has not only achieved great success for our students but also created opportunities for staff progression. Jamie exemplifies this journey, and his unanimous appointment reflects his reflects his outstanding leadership and contribution to our continued growth.”

Stephen said: “Having worked closely with Jamie, I have seen firsthand his capabilities as a leader. He has the vision, skills, experience and to accelerate the college’s positive trajectory and I fully support the governing body’s decision to appoint Jamie on his own merits.”

A spokesperson for Newham College said that with a combined turnover of £55 million and a student population of over 10,000, the merged institution will be the largest educational provider in Newham.

A “bigger, more comprehensive college will offer even greater opportunities for local students”, the spokesperson added.

‘Outrageous’ FE teacher pay gap causing huge vacancies in key priority skills

Poor pay in further education is causing shortages in teachers training the next generation of workers in some of England’s most high-demand sectors, researchers have warned.

A new report by the National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER) explores how college teacher roles in construction, engineering, and digital are seeing huge vacancy levels.

It points out that college teachers can earn much higher salaries in industry, and that they are paid nearly a quarter less than teachers in schools.

NFER economist and report co-author Dawson McLean criticised how despite FE playing a “key role” in the supply of skilled workers to industry, there has been a “historical lack of policy focus” on the sector’s teacher pay levels.

He said: Worsening pay gaps with industry and school teachers, together with high workload, puts the FE workforce at a significant disadvantage for recruitment and retention.”

During the election, Labour pledged to cut overseas recruitment and immigration in priority occupations such as engineers by targeting training at sectors which are facing staff shortages.

However, this plan to invest in technical training appears not to apply to the FE workforce, as the newly elected Labour government decided to hand schools a £1.2 billion pot to help cover a 5.5 per cent salary boost for teachers, but not colleges.

A Department for Education (DfE) spokesperson later told FE Week that this is due to the “very challenging fiscal context” and partly because FE does not have a pay review body in the same way as schools.

Increase pay to match school teachers

NFER’s report, funded by the Gatsby Charitable Foundation, is based on interviews with 61 teachers and heads of department.

It also used FE workforce data on the 2021/22 academic year, published for the first time last summer, to estimate that FE teachers earn 23 per cent less than those in other parts of the education sector.

FE teachers of engineering and digital subjects were about 11 per cent lower than average earnings in their industry occupations, while construction earnings were about 3 per cent less (although this is likely to be an underestimation as researchers were unable to consider self-employment earnings).

Researchers found that in 2021/22, the average general FE college had 17, 14 and 10 unfilled vacancies per 100 teaching staff for construction, engineering and digital, respectively. 

The average college had five unfilled vacancies per 100 staff for all other subjects, “suggesting that, while shortages of teaching staff are not unique to our three focus subjects, it appears to be considerably more of a challenge in these subjects than in many others”, according to the report.

It also said that financial responsibilities of younger workers mean they are generally less able to take the pay cut to move from industry into FE, driving an ageing workforce and worsening retention due to higher retirement rates. 

The research goes on to suggest some college strategies designed to close industry pay gaps can in the longer term exacerbate the problem. Recruiting new teachers at the top of the pay scale can lead to subsequent poor pay progression, and impact on morale and retention.

Nearly half of FE teachers leave the profession within three years nationally.

The report authors are calling for FE teachers’ pay to increase “at a minimum” to match school teachers’.

They also urge the government to help colleges compete with better paying industries by reducing workload and pressure on FE teachers, which it called a “crucial contributor to poor retention”.

A DfE spokesperson told FE Week: “We recognise the vital role that FE teachers and providers play in equipping learners with the skills they need to seize opportunity and to drive growth in our economy. 

“We are investing around £600 million in FE teachers across this financial year and the next, including retention payments for eligible early career FE teachers in key subject areas, and funding to support English and maths GCSE resits.  

“Decisions on funding for further education will be taken as part of the forthcoming spending review.”

Demoralising and unfair

The National Education Union (NEU) is balloting its 2,500 sixth form college teacher members to strike over the 5.5 per cent pay award, which only applies to sixth forms that have converted to academy status.

NEU general secretary Daniel Kebede said: “Now is the time for the new Labour government to make good on its manifesto pledge of a comprehensive strategy in FE, which would include the extension of binding collective bargaining on pay and working conditions to the sector.

“It is the responsibility of the government to provide the requisite funding to close the pay gap between schools and colleges, ensuring that a crucial sector for economic growth can supply the skills needs of the future.”

Sam Parrett, principal and CEO of London South East Colleges, said the FE pay gap is “both demoralising and unfair” for teachers.

She added: “We cannot expect to solve the UK’s skills gap or boost our economy without addressing this issue.

“The longer this pay inequality persists, the harder it will be to deliver the high-quality education and training our students, employers, and the economy desperately need.”

An analysis of the same workforce data by the Institute for Financial Studies, published last year, found that the median salary for a school teacher is now around £41,500 while for college teachers it is £34,500.

FE teachers also saw a higher fall in real earnings than school teachers since 2010.

UCU general secretary Jo Grady warned that Labour will fail to deliver its “promised decade of renewal” without investment that closes the “outrageous” pay gap between college and school teachers.

Association of Colleges chief executive David Hughes said: “Without skilled lecturers in colleges, skills shortages continue to grow, and the government will simply be unable to deliver on its manifesto commitments on new homes, net zero, a reformed NHS, productivity and economic growth. 

“The government has an opportunity in the autumn budget to deliver a significant injection of funding into the sector. Introducing VAT relief for colleges, in the same way it does for schools and academies, would produce around £210 million a year.

“This could start to help to alleviate the severe recruitment and retention challenges.”

MOVERS AND SHAKERS: EDITION 470

Rebecca Conway

Director of Research and Innovation, NCFE

Start date: August 2024

Previous Job: Freelance education and assessment consultant

Interesting fact: A lifelong football fan, Rebecca finally learned to play just 18 months ago after training sessions at her local club. She’s now hooked and playing five-a-side is a weekly highlight for her.


Sam Callear

Chief Operating Officer, GTA England

Start date: September 2024

Previous Job: Deputy Director: Policy and New Concepts, Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education

Interesting fact: Through diligent research, Sam managed to bag Oasis tickets in under an hour after going on sale.


Daniel Green

Policy Director, Federation of Awarding Bodies

Start date: September 2024

Previous Job: Senior Policy Manager, Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education

Interesting fact: Dan’s first job was at a community sports association in New Zealand, however it quickly became apparent that his ability in rugby trailed far behind the locals. A football programme was established in its place.

Labour’s many missions hinge on youth opportunity

In our new report, Edge set out our concerns that, unless the growth and skills levy is carefully designed, greater flexibilities for businesses could squeeze funding for apprenticeship opportunities. As a result, the worrying decline of young people participating in apprenticeships, especially at entry levels, will continue.

There are always winners and losers when it comes to levy reform. However, there are currently no guardrails or pledges of additional money to ensure that the growth and skills levy will be invested in apprenticeships or young people.

Granted, the government has promised traineeships will be in scope. But without strong incentives, the apprenticeships that should follow might simply not be there. 

Levy-paying employers are far less likely to hire young apprentices compared to SMEs. Since the apprenticeship levy’s introduction, the number of under-19s starting an apprenticeship has dropped by 37 per cent.

Looking at these trends over the past few years, it’s hard to comprehend how giving them more flexibility to spend this money on other skills training (in tandem, squeezing the pot available for SMEs) could result in more opportunities for young people.

Our report identifies that the growth and skills levy could also risk compromising achievement of other government policies and missions. The opportunity mission, aiming to break “the pernicious link between background and success”, hinges partly on delivering a ‘youth guarantee’. This promises every 18-to-21-year-old that they will have access to training, support to find work or, critically, an apprenticeship. 

This is a hugely welcome pledge, given the number of young people not in education, employment and training has risen to 872,000.

Apprenticeships are the unrealised heart of the government’s growth mission. Bridget Phillipson said it best in a recent op-ed about the construction sector being the manpower that will deliver Labour’s promise to build 370,000 more homes/year: “to get Britain moving again, we also need skilled technicians […] But too few young people are pursuing these careers and it’s holding Britain back.” 

All of these missions are potentially in jeopardy

Growth also means investing in our domestic workforce. Home secretary Yvette Cooper has singled out IT and engineering as her first areas of focus. As we highlight in our report, these two industries are crying out for more young apprentices.  

An NHS Fit for the Future? Not without apprentices! A representative from NHS England warned us that allowing apprenticeship numbers to drop will seriously impact their ability to deliver the health service long-term workforce plan.  

Make Britain a clean energy superpower? Sounds like we’ll need a few low-carbon heating technicians for that. 

All of these missions are potentially in jeopardy unless the levy is carefully designed to protect apprenticeship opportunities for young people. As well as presenting the options at its disposal, in our report, we urge the government to use the many levers at its disposal to make a substantial difference to employers’ ability to use their levy to create more, lower-level opportunities for young people before jumping to – or at least, in conjunction with – flex of the levy. 

This could include building on best-practice examples here and internationally to broker apprenticeships and support employers to understand their skills needs.

It might involve reforming the EPA and functional skills qualifications that are holding back apprenticeship completions.

And it should comprise streamlining the application and advertising of apprenticeships towards a meaningful one-stop shop, in the same way we have for university admissions. It’s not an easy fix, but a crucial one if we want to get serious about opportunity. 

We also present a series of options available to the government and Skills England in considering the proportions of the levy that can be spent on non-apprenticeship skills training, the types of training courses that should be eligible for funding and who should benefit.  

As Labour prepare for conference, they are right to focus on what businesses want. After all, they are the backbone of our economy. However, it is crucial to remember that they also depend on a skilled pipeline of new talent.

We will inevitably need to make short-term sacrifices to achieve long-term gain, but we now need the government to show courage in its own vision for change.

Read the full report, Flex Without Compromise: Preserving Apprenticeships for Young People Under a Growth and Skills Levy, here

Tight controls on new levy to avoid ‘complete racket’ – report

Failing to impose strict controls on what training the incoming growth and skills levy can pay for would turn it into a “complete racket” for employers, a Labour peer has warned.

A report on the new government’s proposed reformed apprenticeship levy, released by the Edge Foundation today, looks at what “levers are left to pull” that would target the policy to benefit young people.

It warns that too much non-apprenticeship training could erode “already dwindling” apprenticeship opportunities especially at lower levels for those aged under 25.

But first, Labour urgently needs to “clearly articulate” what it hopes to achieve with levy reform to avoid damaging the apprenticeship “brand” – a task that has been handed to new quango Skills England.

Here are some key options the Edge Foundation suggests the government consider.

Limit the scope of non-apprenticeship spending

The charity has called on Skills England to put “tight guardrails” on what types of non-apprenticeship training levy funds can be spent on.

To ensure the training is “high quality”, the skills body should set “specified standards of quality, learner experience and outcomes”.

Labour peer and leading economist Lord Richard Layard, who wrote the foreword for the report and had his views featured throughout, tells the Edge Foundation adding too much flex would be a “complete racket”.

He adds: “What businesses want is to be able to use the apprenticeship levy to pay for things which they currently pay for themselves. It’s an absolute outrage.”

Prioritise ‘pre-apprenticeship’ style spending

Limiting levy flexibilities to pre-apprenticeship training would both promote apprenticeships to young people while conserving funding, the charity said.

Ahead of the general election, Labour pledged to set aside 3 per cent of the skills and growth levy for 150,000 traineeships. 

But Edge Foundation urges the government to “learn lessons” from previous the previous traineeship scheme, scrapped by the government due to low take up.

Ringfence for certain groups

The government could add ringfences for certain groups, such as the young, or lower-level apprentices, to halt the trend of employers spending their levy on “more expensive, higher-level apprenticeships and/or on existing, older employees”.

But while this could be a “powerful driver” of employer behaviour, the charity acknowledges warnings from former skills Sir Michael Barber, who has argued that higher-level degree apprenticeships are good for social mobility and “integral” in improving apprenticeships’ prestige.

Flex %s with caution

Labour plans originally suggested employers would be able to spend up to 50 per cent of their levy allocation on non-apprenticeship training, but this threshold was notably absent in their 2024 general election manifesto.

The more recent language of “up to 50 per cent” suggests Labour has “listened to the uneasiness about such an arbitrary division”, Edge’s report said.

It states that most interviewees who participated in their research preferred a majority share for apprenticeships, with Policy Exchange, for example, suggesting ringfencing 75 per cent of the levy for apprenticeships.

Alternatively, employers could be required to “earn” their flexible allowance by first spending a set proportion, for example 50 per cent, of their levy fund on apprenticeships, the report added.

It said: “Proceeding with caution when it comes to setting the proportions of the growth and skills levy seems like a sensible approach – how much employers can spend on non-apprenticeship skills training can always be increased, but it is harder to remove flexibilities from the system.”

‘Treasury Margin’

One way to fund non-apprenticeship skills training without reducing the number of apprenticeships available could be to tap into the estimated £835 million ‘Treasury Margin’.

This is the gap between how much the levy generates in employer receipts verses how much the Treasury hands to the Department for Education and the devolved nations as their apprenticeship budget.

However, this option is “unlikely to be popular” at the Treasury, due to what the Edge Foundation calls a “lack of transparency and accountability”.

Extend levy to more businesses

Another way to raise money could be to extend the levy to all UK businesses, raising as much as £1.6 billion per year.

Currently, only businesses with an annual payroll of over £3 million pay 0.5 per cent of their payroll bill into the levy.

Increase small business apprenticeships

Key to more young people and lower-level apprenticeships is reversing the decline of starts in small businesses since 2017, the report argues.

To do this, the government should roll out financial incentives, building on other welcome recent steps such as removing the cap for small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and fully funding their training.

Address functional skills

The government should urgently look at the “suitability” of functional skills requirements, which many view as a “barrier to completion”.

Gill Mason, training academy director at Kids Planet, a learning provider and employer in early years, told the Edge Foundation: “It isn’t functional. It’s GCSE. It’s just what they’ve just left and come away from.

“It absolutely is the main reason our staff leave and don’t achieve is maths and English.”

Improve wages

Put apprenticeships on an “even keel” with other routes such as entry-level jobs and undergraduate degrees that have student loan support, the edge argues.

This would address surveys which have found that one-quarter of apprenticeship applicants didn’t pursue the careers route due to “affordability” concerns.

The Department for Education and Treasury have been approached for comment.

Read the full report here.

Team UK win silver and bronze at WorldSkills Lyon

Team UK has scooped two silver and two bronze medals at this year’s WorldSkills competition in Lyon, France.

After four days of gruelling competition, Team UK were awarded four podium position medals at an electric ceremony this evening.

The UK also bagged 14 medallions of excellence across 12 skills.

Earlier this evening, family, friends, experts and officials descended on the OL Arena on the outskirts of Lyon to watch the 1,500 young people discover who came out on top as the world’s best in 62 skills competitions.

Solihull College alumni Harry Scolding won silver in joinery. He was tasked with building a working door over the course of four days.

Harry Scolding, joinery

He said: “I still haven’t come round to the fact that this has just happened.”

Scolding currently runs his own business HDS Joinery and said his customers had been “very supportive” with his training schedule in the last 6 weeks.

Scolding’s parents Katie and Lee, who own and run a hairdressing business, told FE Week earlier in the week that it is an “honour” being the parents of a WorldSkills UK champion.

“I’m not surprised that my son has got himself there, because he’s got a lot of determination and drive, and we’re just hoping he’s going to do really well in his competition,” Lee Scolding said.


Ruben Duggan, silver medallist, with training manager Ronnie Ferris

Ruben Duggan also won silver in the plumbing and heating. Duggan achieved the same feat in last year’s EuroSkills in Gdansk, Poland.

“When I came out of the bay, I was feeling a bit deflated. I didn’t think I’d put the best I’ve ever put into it, but I can’t think about it now. It’s absolutely brilliant.”

Duggan works for Powerserv LTD and trains at Coleg Y Cymoedd, Wales.

In the refrigeration and air conditioning skill, bronze was awarded Eastleigh College’s Luke Haile.

Haile, who works for Lightfoot Defence in Fareham, Hampshire, told FE Week that he has got “so much more” out of competing in and training for two and a half years for WorldSkills.

“I’d like to keep going onwards and upwards. It’s what WorldSkills has taught me is to keep pushing and see how far you go.”

David McKeown also won bronze for his skill in autobody repair. McKeown works at his family business James McKeown Accident Repair and trains at Riverpark Training in Northern Ireland.

McKeown told FE Week that his win felt “very surreal”.

“I went in with a really good head at the start of the competition,” he said. “The first two days were really good, the third day was hard.

“I realised how tight my competition was. China and Japan really made my job hard but fair play to them.”

The closing ceremony also presented the ‘Best in Nation’ award to Ruby Pile, Team UK’s restaurant service competitor.

Pile works at Lucknam Park Hotel and Spa and attended Cardiff and Vale College.

Medallions for excellence in 12 skills were also awarded for achieving the international standard benchmark.

Ben Blackledge, WorldSkills UK chief executive, said: “This is a fantastic result for the team and the UK as a whole.  High quality skills development is crucial to growing the economy, and Team UK’s medal-winning performance in front of a global audience sends a strong message that the UK is a world-class place to invest, develop talent and create jobs.”

See the full table of winners here:

WorldSkills 2024 UK results

MedalSkillNameTraining provider
SilverJoineryHarry ScoldingSolihull College and University Centre
SilverPlumbing and heatingRuben DugganColeg Y Cymoedd
BronzeRefrigeration and air conditioningLuke HaileEastleigh College
BronzeAutobody repairDavid McKeownRiverpark Training
Medallion for ExcellenceMechatronicsLucy Yelland and Ben LoveTameside College
Medallion for ExcellenceMechanical engineering CADNathan YoungNew College Lanarkshire
Medallion for ExcellenceWeb technologiesMark KissUnited Colleges Group
Medallion for ExcellenceElectrical installationDaniel KnoxSouth West College
Medallion for ExcellencePainting and decoratingDior ReganLincoln College
Medallion for ExcellenceCabinet makingIsaac BinghamSouthern Regional College
Medallion for ExcellenceHairdressingCharlotte LloydReds Hair Company
Medallion for ExcellenceCookingOska ReadyDN Colleges Group
Medallion for ExcellenceCar paintingMiguel HarveySteer Automotive Group
Medallion for ExcellenceIT network systems administrationFinley GrahamCity of Glasgow College / Glasgow Caledonian University
Medallion for ExcellenceDigital constructionIsabelle BarronSheffield Hallam University
Medallion for ExcellenceRobot systems integrationJason Scott & Charlie CarsonNorthern Regional College & Northern Regional College / University of Ulster
Best in countryRestaurant serviceRuby PileCardiff and Vale College

WorldSkills 2024: How to watch the closing ceremony

After four days of intensive competitions, all eyes are now on Sunday evening’s WorldSkills 2024 closing ceremony.

Among thousands of international visitors and spectators, this year’s troupe of 1,400 competitors from 69 competing countries and regions will finally find out if they’ve done enough to place themselves and their countries on the medal table.

Proceedings will begin 6.30pm, streamed live below, with a brief programme of remarks from WorldSkills dignitaries.

Then, skill by skill, the highest-scoring competitors will be announced as gold, silver and bronze medallists.

One top competitor will be named the recipient of the prestigious Albert Vidal Award, which goes to the champion who received the highest score of the entire competition. The UK last won the Albert Vidal Award in 2015.

We also expect a spectacular performance from WorldSkills Shanghai, marking the official handover from Lyon for WorldSkills 2026.