NUT leads Sixth Form College strike with London protests over pay

The National Union of Teachers (NUT) has led a one-day national strike for sixth-form college’s (SFCs) across the country, including a march on Parliament to protest against cuts to funding for the sector.

Owen Jones. NUT 6th form College strike against Government cuts to sixth form college funding. London. © Jess Hurd/reportdigital.co.uk
© Jess Hurd/reportdigital.co.uk

The NUT held a rally at noon at the Camden Centre, where speeches were made by figures including Kevin Courtney, deputy general secretary of the NUT, and author and commentator Owen Jones (pictured left).

Protestors then travelled to Parliament on Routemaster buses (below right) branded with slogans including ‘save 16-19 education’, and chanted and waved banners outside the Department for Education (DfE).

A petition for education secretary Nicky Morgan was presented at the door.

Commenting on the strike, a spokesperson for the DfE said the department had spoken to 90 per cent of sixth form colleges yesterday (Monday 14), and knew of only two that were expecting to be closed due to the strike action.

On Twitter, Henley College posted that teaching was cancelled for the day, and local news website Brighton and Hove News reported that Brighton and Hove SFC was closed.

Picket lines were also photographed at a number of colleges, including St Francis Xavier SFC, which was visited by NUT general secretary Christine Blower, and City and Islington SFC, which was visited by Mr Courtney.

The plan to strike had been temporarily threatened by court action, launched by the government in an attempt to prevent it taking place. However, London’s High Court yesterday (March 14) ruled against the challenge, enabling the strike to go ahead.

Commenting on the events, David Igoe, chief executive of the Sixth Form Colleges’ Association (SFCA), said: “As far as we know the strike is having little effect on the ground with no colleges reporting to us that they are closing.”

He added that the SFCA’s position on the strike action remained the same.

NUT 6th form College strike against Government cuts to sixth form college funding. London. © Jess Hurd/reportdigital.co.uk
© Jess Hurd/reportdigital.co.uk

“We have no problem standing with the Union in pursuing a better funding deal for sixth form colleges, but believe this strike to be ill-judged and potentially damaging to young people’s education,” he said.

“This is a vital time in the run up to public examinations and a strike can damage the reputation of colleges with potential parents and students who are considering their next steps at 16.”

Mr Igoe added: “Our campaign of relentlessly presenting the evidence for the effectiveness and efficiency of SFCs led, we believe, to the helpful statement by the chancellor in the Autumn statement which both gave a funding guarantee for the sector and the opportunity to consider academy status and the VAT rebate.

“We will continue to press the government for recognition that the funding settlement for the 16-18 phase is inadequate and will prevent colleges and schools from delivering a worthwhile curriculum.

“Industrial action targeted just on the SFC sector is unlikely to make this case as effectively as our cross-party political campaigning and may, indeed, make things worse for our colleges.”

A DfE spokesman said in a statement on Monday (March 14): “The NUT is seeking to disrupt the education of thousands of students and damage the reputation of the profession. We are disappointed with the court’s decision and are considering our options.

“We recognise the importance of investing in education which is why, thanks to the difficult decisions we have taken elsewhere, we have been able to protect core 16 to 19 funding.

“At the same time we have ended the unfair difference between post-16 schools and colleges by funding them per student to ensure that all young people leave education with the skills they need to thrive in modern Britain.”

SFC members of the NUT voted for strike action on February 29, with 86 per cent in favour, from a 44 per cent turnout.

The question put to members was “In order to persuade the Secretary of State for Education [Nicky Morgan] to increase presently inadequate funding levels which cause detrimental changes to terms and conditions within the sixth form college sector are you prepared to take a day’s strike action?”

A total of 1,689 NUT members took part in the ballot, with 1,453 voting for the strike action and 235 against.

Photos by Jess Hurd. 

High Court throws out government challenge to college strike action

London’s High Court has rejected a government attempt to stop strike action taking place at sixth form colleges across the country tomorrow.

The ruling comes after FE Week reported on Friday that the government had launched court action to challenge the planned National Union of Teachers (NUT) action.

It means that the strike action will now be going ahead tomorrow.

Kevin Courtney, deputy general secretary of the National Union of Teachers, said: “The High Court’s decision is a victory for democracy and common sense.

“It is abundantly clear that government cuts to sixth form college funding are having a direct impact on our members’ terms and conditions and as such we are entitled to take strike action.

He added it was “regrettable” the government had not attempted to “resolve the dispute”.

“No one wants to take strike action but this is a serious issue that is getting increasingly worse,” said Mr Courtney.

“The NUT has been left with no option but to raise awareness of the problem through industrial action. Nicky Morgan’s challenge to the legitimacy of our strike action has just made that job easier.”

The union announced on February 29 that its members had backed the strike through a ballot, with 86 per cent voting in favour of the industrial action from a 44 per cent turnout.

A total of 1,689 NUT members took part in the ballot, with 1,453 voting for the strike action and 235 against.

The question put to members was “In order to persuade the Secretary of State for Education [Nicky Morgan] to increase presently inadequate funding levels which cause detrimental changes to terms and conditions within the sixth form college sector are you prepared to take a day’s strike action?”

A Department for Education spokesman said: “The NUT is seeking to disrupt the education of thousands of students and damage the reputation of the profession. We are disappointed with the court’s decision and are considering our options.

“We recognise the importance of investing in education which is why, thanks to the difficult decisions we have taken elsewhere, we have been able to protect core 16 to 19 funding.

“At the same time we have ended the unfair difference between post-16 schools and colleges by funding them per student to ensure that all young people leave education with the skills they need to thrive in modern Britain.”

Almost 90 per cent of providers fear for apprenticeships quality

Nine out of ten apprenticeship sector leaders who took part in an exclusive FE Week survey fear quality will suffer as the government drives towards 3m apprenticeship starts by 2020.

It was carried out ahead of the FE Week Annual Apprenticeship Conference (AAC) – which will be attended by nearly 1,000 staff from colleges, independent training providers and awarding organisations over tomorrow, Thursday, and Friday at the Birmingham ICC.

There was a fairly even split, among 209 respondents to the survey sent to delegates, between those that thought the 3m target would be achieved and those who didn’t — but 88 per cent were concerned about quality suffering.

FE Week survey results:

Are you concerned quality will suffer in effort to increase quantity?
Yes – very concerned 85 41% 183 88%
Yes – a little concerned 98 47%
No – not very concerned 21 10% 23 11%
No – not at all concerned 2 1%
Don’t know 3 1% 1 0%
Total 209
Keith Smith
Keith Smith

 

Delegates at AAC, which is organised by FE Week parent company Lsect in partnership with the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS), will hear tomorrow from Skills Funding Agency director Keith Smith who is now leading levy implementation.

Ofsted chief inspector Sir Michael Wilshaw will also deliver a keynote conference speech on Thursday morning, when he is expected to repeat his concern raised in October about poor quality apprenticeships, for example in cleaning and coffee making.

A damning Ofsted report published at the same time, following a thematic review, also warned of low-skilled jobs being rebadged as apprenticeships.

Sir Michael Wilshaw
Sir Michael Wilshaw

Sir Michael will be joined for a question and answer session after his AAC speech by Ofsted deputy director for FE and skills Paul Joyce, who told the BBC at the start of National Apprenticeship Week that the inspectorate had come across “apprentices that received very little to no training”.

“The best practice is with industries that have quite a long history of apprenticeships, like construction and engineering, but with some sectors like retail and customer services, the experience was less positive,” he added.

Delegates also expressed concern, through the survey, about lack of detail over the way the reforms, such as the levy, would be implemented.

Neil Coates, director of vocational and growth at Newham College, asked: “When will we know all the facts? The lack of clear information at a time of area reviews is a massive disadvantage to FE colleges.”

Matt Garvey, managing director at independent training provider WBTC, said: “The vision is sound but the lack of detail on how the reforms will work has created an environment of rumour, supposition and fear.”

Karen Bailey, head of competence development at employer provider Volvo Group, warned the “ill thought out” reform programme was in a state of “chaos”.

“We are planning our budgets for next year and the information changes week by week,” she added. Ms Bailey said the situation was an “utter disgrace” and appeared “to be led by the Treasury as a revenue stream rather than by BIS as a way of improving apprenticeships”.

When asked to comment on the findings of the survey, Skills Minister Nick Boles said: “One of the main objectives of our reforms is to put an end to poor quality apprenticeship training.

“Following the introduction of the apprenticeship levy employers will control the money invested in apprenticeship training and will have a strong incentive to drive up its quality.”

More survey results will be published tomorrow, and live conference action can be followed on Twitter with the #AAC2016 hashtag.

Middlesbrough College joins the 157 Group

Middlesbrough College has been confirmed as the latest new member of 157 Group, FE Week can reveal.

Zoe Lewis (pictured above), principal and chief executive, announced the news on the college’s website today.

It comes after the 157 Group exclusively revealed its expansion plans to FE Week in January and brings the total number to 31.

Ms Lewis said: “We are delighted to be selected to join the 157 Group.

“It’s recognition of the high quality training we provide and we look forward to working in collaboration with like-minded colleges to shape the future skills agenda and create a network of excellence across the country to support employers with their training needs.”

FE Week revealed on March 1 that City College Plymouth (CCP) had become the second college to join the 157 Group as part of its expansion plans.

The group’s chief executive, Ian Pretty said at the time he was “pleased to welcome” CCP, which was rated ‘good’ by Ofsted at its most recent inspection in 2012, “to our network of forward thinking, entrepreneurial colleges”.

That announcement came a little over a month after Cardiff and Vale College became the first college to join the 157 Group.

Reflecting on the latest announcement, Mr Pretty said: “Middlesbrough College embodies the 157 Group mission; it is employer facing, it is entrepreneurial and it has a deep commitment to improving the employment prospects of its learners.

“Middlesbrough College gives the 157 Group a presence in the North East, they have shown they are dedicated to their community and their region, investing in the most disengaged young people to improve their life chances through the MC Academy and shifting their offer to meet local economic needs which enhance their region’s economic competitiveness.

“They work with over 1,000 employers and have over 1,000 apprentices and have exciting plans for the years ahead. We can’t wait to get started working with them.”

A 157 Group spokesperson added: “Membership of the 157 Group is now 31 full members and two corporate partners. With the addition of Middlesbrough College we now have a presence in the North East meaning our network stretches across every region of the UK with partnership from business as well.

“We are a strong voice for our members and the FE sector as we seek to transform the UK economy through the delivery of high quality technical and professional education.”

Reaping the long-term benefits

Stephanie Palmer advises employers on the best ways to mentor apprentices to become long-term assets to a company.

After spending eight months studying sports therapy at university, I decided that it was not the right route for me.

I was unhappy with the quality of the course I was paying a huge amount for and decided to explore other non-university career paths.

At school, training as an apprentice wasn’t endorsed with equal merit as going to university, so I hadn’t really seen an apprenticeship as a viable route.

But after being disappointed with my university experience, I decided to research the option.

It was then that I came across the opportunity to work as an apprentice business coordinator for Fujitsu.

I leapt at the chance to train with such a highly regarded company.

The prospect of walking into a real working environment was quite daunting — far more intimidating than turning up for the first day of fresher’s week at university.

But as soon as I started my apprenticeship these nerves were put to rest.

I was working in a fun and supportive environment that was driving my career forward and allowing me to learn while earning.

As I progressed over the three years of my apprenticeship, I saw a need within the company for someone to mentor new intakes.

I was appointed as the overarching apprentice mentor for Fujitsu UK and Ireland to ensure Fujitsu could support them professionally and that they completed the scheme as highly trained and experienced employees.

From my experience of running apprenticeship workshops and as an apprentice ambassador, there are a few key steps I believe employers can take to ensure that they mentor successful apprenticeships.

Apprentices are here to learn and making mistakes and learning from them is a part of that

Firstly, take the time to find the right candidate.

The most important attribute for an apprentice is an eagerness to learn and a passion for your company.

If a candidate does not seem fully engaged at the start, they are less likely to stay with your company after their training.

If you have invested valuable time and money into their training, of course you would be disappointed to see them leave, so it is important not to rush the hiring process and make sure they are passionate about their role and training and the company itself.

Secondly, foster a happy working environment.

Be mindful that this is likely to be the first working environment that your apprentices have worked in.

This is naturally daunting, so in order to keep the candidates motivated, it is important that they feel relaxed and comfortable in the working environment and with their new colleagues.

A great way to achieve this is to ensure they are integrated fully into the workplace and treated as other permanent members of staff would be.

A nice strategy to introduce is allocating an individual mentor or ‘buddy’ to each apprentice.

This is something that has worked really well at Fujitsu, allowing the apprentices to have a friend and sounding board for any concerns they might have.

And finally, allow them to make mistakes.

Mistakes happen, particularly in your first working role.

The beauty of an apprenticeship, is the opportunity it provides to learn in a real place of work, so it is important that employers remember apprentices are here to learn and making mistakes and learning from them is a part of that.

What is crucial is that they are shown constructively how to get around issues, feel supported and learn from these mistakes.

 

NAW-strip-web

banner-adAAC2016web

 

Stephanie Palmer is a former apprentice for Fujitsu, apprentice ambassador for GetMyFirstJob, and winner of the 2015 West Midlands Higher Apprentice of the Year award

Apprentice minimum wage rate rising by 10 pence an hour

The national minimum wage rate for apprentices will increase from £3.30 to £3.40 from October 1.

The announcement was made by Sajid Javid (pictured), Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, in a written statement to parliament this morning, the first day on National Apprenticeship Week 2016.

He explained that the Low Pay Commission’s 2016 report made the recommendation for the apprenticeship increase.

The government plans to fulfull along with all other recommendations on the National Minimum Wage, which include that the adult hourly national minium wage rate for 21 to 24-year-olds should increase from £6.70 to £6.95.

Other commission recommendations set to be implemented by the government include increasing the youth development rate, which covers  aged 18 to 20-year-olds, should go up from £5.30 to £5.55, while the rate for 16 to 17-year-olds should rise from £3.87 to £4.00.

It also recommends that the apprentice rate should increase from £3.30 to £3.40. The Commission recommend that all of these changes take place from 1 October 2016.

He added: “On the subject of compliance and enforcement of the National Minimum Wage, the Low Pay Commission’s report recommends that the government considers introducing a requirement on employers that the payslips of hourly-paid staff include a clear statement of hours being paid for, and that the government introduces a formal, public protocol for HM Revenue and Vustoms to handle third-party whistleblowing on breaches of the national minimum wage.

“The government is committed to the effective enforcement. We will consider these options in full.”

The announcement comes just five months after FE Week reported last October that apprentices were today benefiting from a 20 per cent boost to their National Minimum Wage to £3.30 an-hour.

Mr Javid said that the time that the inflation-busting increase, from the old £2.73-an-hour rate, was “the largest in history, making sure that apprenticeships remain an attractive option for young people”.

It came as the adult national minimum wage rate increased at that time from £6.50 to £6.70.

Sending out the right messages

Ruth Sparkes advises providers on how best to promote their apprenticeships programmes.

We have, in our marketing armoury, lots of ammunition when it comes to recruiting potential students and persuading them that getting an apprenticeship is a good idea

There are specialist magazines, prospectuses, websites, job-matching services, mobile apps, social media, bumper stickers — not to mention the national weeks dedicated to raising the awareness of apprenticeships.

We have built this arsenal because to get students’ attention there is a lot of competition.

Schools are competing with colleges, colleges and training providers are both working and competing with employers — and each other — while employers are working and competing with universities to sign-up the potential ‘high flyers’.

But because apprenticeships are not A-levels, parents and the media are not particularly interested in them, or well informed about them — we need to continually tell the world about how successful young people who complete apprenticeships really are.

Apprenticeships still suffer from a tainted reputation.

Just last month, an inquiry was launched to look at how the Government proposes to achieve its target and how standards can be maintained and enforced.

And the Sutton Trust recently reported 60 per cent of apprenticeships are currently set at GCSE standard (level two), with too many offering ‘little value beyond traditional work experience placements’.

We used GCSE results day last year to get an apprentice on ITV’s This Morning

After reading this, put yourself in our audience’s shoes — do we look like we’re trying to pass off a pig’s ear as a silk purse?

I often maintain that marketing is not about papering over the cracks. Even though apprenticeships are a long way off being perfect, there are some obstacles that we can identify and overcome.

We need to accept there isn’t parity of esteem for apprenticeships and complaining about this is a waste of time.

Schools and universities are major influencers and they are not currently singing the praises of apprenticeships — a Russell Group university will not look favourably on apprenticeships as a route to their brand of higher education.

Look at local schools’ websites — if there’s an alumni page, how many listings mention ex-students going off to complete an apprenticeship?

In the blurb about the school or under ‘destinations’, is there a list of students who go on to apprenticeships after GCSE or A-levels? I’m guessing not.

Colleges aren’t so hot at this either.

In the media we see plenty of stories about students who are Oxbridge bound, but not many about students who are apprenticeship bound. It’s not a criticism; it’s just not ‘news’.

My first tip would be keep the messages simple.

Have at least three messages for your different audiences — for parents and apprentices your message might be ‘employers are hungry for certain skills and this is the most cost effective route to a valuable career – debt free!

Secondly, use current national stories — topics to piggyback on currently include skills shortages, mindfulness, women in STEM, males in primary schools, aerospace and Europe.

We used GCSE results day last year to get an apprentice on ITV’s This Morning.

Thirdly, find a personal or unusual angle. Look for something unique.

We’ve used ex-soldiers who’ve retrained in construction — Baghdad to Battersea — and a costume apprentice at the English National Opera.

Finally, beware the stereotype. Even high quality images of females painting nails and males laying bricks do nothing to further our cause.

NAW-strip-web

banner-adAAC2016web

 

Ruth Sparkes is managing director of EMPRA, an education media and PR agency

Maintaining that cutting edge

Exeter College is rated outstanding by Ofsted which has praised the excellent progress made there by apprentices. So John Laramy, who will start as principal in April and was previously deputy principal in charge of curriculum, quality and standards at the college, reflects here on the secret of success for its apprenticeship programme.

Since the age of 16, when I entered the construction industry as a trainee and attended college, first on a block release basis and then on a day release basis, I have been aware of the impact of teaching and learning on ambition and ultimately on success.

I endorse the drive to increase the quality and quantity of apprentices within our country, but fear the biggest barrier is a cultural one, and we as a sector need to be passionate about communicating with and informing both schools and parents of the benefits of apprenticeships.

In addition, the Government has a key role to play in driving a wider cultural change and acceptance of apprenticeships as a different, but valid vehicle for learning and career advancement.

There are four elements that feature in truly outstanding apprenticeship provision: partnership, industry standards, relevance and ambition.

Our apprenticeship provision success is based on some key foundations.

In my view, at the heart of a successful apprenticeship is partnership. Today, for the majority of providers, it goes three ways between the apprentice, employer and provider.

While I see value in the apprenticeship ethos for people of all ages, and support lifelong learning, the key focus of our college for our apprenticeship provision and the employers we work with is young people, primarily aged up to 24 years of age.

Employers are busy, so it is critical that time is spent to identify the right apprentice, for the right employer.

It is critical that time is spent to identify the right apprentice

For our college, this unfunded investment has been a critical element of our success — in fact our current problem is that we have more vacancies than we have candidates.

An apprenticeship programme is a time and capacity commitment for an employer.

To create a programme that is meaningful, valid and robust takes resource, and requires ‘two-way’ honest conversations right from the outset.

There are many different providers across the country and we have a responsibility to deliver outstanding training that makes a difference: for businesses this means to the bottom line.

The second critical area is ensuring that we match current industry standards.

As a sector, we have a responsibility to drive innovation and stay at the cutting edge, this is why the right level of funding for apprenticeships is critical.

It is about being prepared to go above and beyond the framework requirement and recognising that sometimes the standard offer is just not enough.

Relevance is about making sure that teaching staff are current, up-to-date and reflective of current practice.

The best teachers bring vocational teaching to life by using examples and experiences. I see apprentices fully engage when great staff share real life situations.

Ambition is about setting standards, whether a qualification is graded or not, and it’s also about encouraging excellence.

Some providers use competition and others use role models, whatever the approach, I believe outstanding teaching and learning manifests ambition.

My hope for the future is that we start to celebrate the difference between full-time and apprenticeship learning, rather than endlessly hunting for the similarity.

The key thing I would ask for is stability; each government sees skills education as a set of chess pieces to be moved.

Since 1981 I believe there have been 28 Acts of Parliament, 61 ministers involved and seven different agencies!

Let’s make a decision for the benefit of the country, get all party support and stick with a ‘generation plan’.

NAW-strip-web

banner-adAAC2016web

 

John Laramy is principal designate of Exeter College

Apprenticeships must work for young women too

Huge numbers of women are now taking apprenticeships, but Dr Carole Easton explains why YWT thinks they are missing out “at every level” compared to their male counterparts.

Much has changed since apprenticeships mainly acted as a route into trades for men, with few opportunities for women.

Last year 264,750 women and 235,140 men began apprenticeships, which would seem to represent one of the huge successes of the apprenticeship programme.

However the reality is not so clear cut.

At their best, apprenticeships can offer young people new skills and excellent routes into employment, help employers fill skill gaps and make a huge contribution to a productive economy.

Sadly, not all apprenticeships are created equal and it is young women who are losing out at every level.

We recently reported there is a gender pay gap in apprenticeships.

And 16 per cent of young women told us they were out of work following an apprenticeship compared to 6 per cent of men.

Gender segregation is also very high in apprenticeships.

For every woman starting an apprenticeship in engineering there are 25 men. In plumbing the ratio is 1:74.

Gender segregation is very high in apprenticeships

Having asked young people about apprenticeships YWT commissioned a survey of the general population from ComRes and found that university continues to be preferred by middle class parents.

Working class parents were more likely to prefer apprenticeships for their children.

Overall, there is a tendency to see apprenticeships as best suited to young people, under 25 with low academic qualifications and seeking skilled manual work.

Some 89 per cent consider apprenticeships to be equally suited to men and women, but 7 per cent say they are better for men and 3 per cent for women.

In my view, these statistics demonstrate that there is a long way to go before apprenticeships are seen by everyone as a genuine and valued alternative to university degrees and before they become a route to greater equality of opportunities for young women with and without academic qualifications.

Even when young women do consider apprenticeships, they report that there are a number of deterrents.

They have told YWT that poor quality, stereotypical careers advice; lack of confidence; bullying and harassment in male dominated work places — and the portrayal of what constitutes women’s work in the media — all contribute to the persistence of job and apprenticeship segregation.

They are also deterred by the lack of flexible working hours and very poor pay (it is legal to pay an apprentice £3.30 per hour in their first year) — which is completely untenable for most people and particularly for young women who have caring responsibilities.

YWT is making recommendations which can make a difference.

We are asking employers and training providers to take positive action where the numbers of women are disproportionately low.

This could include setting targets, reserving places on courses and providing work experience placements.

To improve the opportunities for those who have left school with few qualifications, YWT is also encouraging employers and training providers to remove any formal academic entry requirements for apprenticeships unless they are directly necessary for performing the role.

We are also asking for clearer data which shows what is happening to women and men during and after apprenticeships.

We want pay and financial support increased and a greater availability of part time and flexible opportunities.

We also want to see improvements in the advice and support given to apprentices before during and after their apprenticeships.

NAW-strip-web

banner-adAAC2016web

 

Dr Carole Easton is chief executive of the Young Women’s Trust