Skills reform

National Skills Fund consultation launched


A consultation has been launched on the government’s new level 3 qualifications offer, its skills bootcamps programme and how it can “meet critical skills needs”.

The consultation on the offers, all run through the £2.5 billion National Skills Fund, was originally meant to begin in the spring but was pushed back.

The Department for Education has invited providers, awarding bodies, employers, local authorities, regulators, representative bodies and the public to take part before the September 17 cut-off.

“The responses from this consultation will help shape the provision which is currently funded through National Skills Fund investment,” the consultation document explains.

FE Week has pulled out the important information from the document’s three sections: free level 3 qualifications for adults, skills bootcamps, and meeting critical skills needs.


Free level 3 qualifications for adults

The DfE is eager for the entitlement for a first, full, free level 3 qualification for anyone aged over 24 to “be delivered in a way that works for them, helping adults overcome barriers to accessing learning”.

This section focuses on such barriers, including financial ones, and asks respondents for their thoughts on how barriers can be overcome. Perhaps through flexible start dates, breaks in learning, or weekend and evening classes, it poses.

Officials are also looking for answers to how adults can access the level 3 entitlement without that level of learning.

“We recognise that for some adults accessing the free level 3 qualifications may prove challenging as they may lack some of the prior learning or experience needed to engage in learning at level 3,” the consultation document reads.

How employers can “benefit from this offer and the skills it provides” is also explored in this section.


Skills bootcamps

The new short courses in digital and technical skills are being rolled out to every region of England, following pilots across the nation last year.

Ahead of the wider introduction of bootcamps, the DfE is asking providers what they find most valuable about the courses.

It is also questioning what challenges providers face delivering them and how the courses could be changed, including by asking them for their thoughts the current 16-week maximum period for bootcamps.

consultation“Some further education colleges and other providers have said to us that they have held back from delivering skills bootcamps because – while they have been delivered on a smaller scale – skills bootcamps have been funded through a separate procurement process,” the consultation reads.

While employers are already being asked to pay 30 per cent of course cost for training their own employees, the consultation is also seeking views on non-financial contributions employers could make.

This may include giving up space for training, providing equipment, or allowing their workers time to learn.

Additionally, “to ensure that adults can easily move onto other training or learning after completing a skills bootcamp” the consultation wants answers on how the courses can fit into progression routes.

Respondents are asked what further learning bootcamp participants should progress onto, ranging from no further learning to an apprenticeship or other further training or learning opportunities.


Meeting critical skills needs

The consultation highlights a “growing employer demand for higher technical skills which is not being met,” in industries such as manufacturing and construction, on top of a shortage of STEM skills.

To meet this problem, the DfE is asking respondents for skills gaps below degree level they think will not be met now or in five years’ time.

One possible solution the government is seeking views on is shorter courses lasting under 12 months in areas of emerging technologies or industries in a period of transition.

The consultation asks if there are particular sectors or occupations which short courses may help, or if short courses might help adults overcome barriers to learning.

Employers and providers are also asked if they have funded or delivered short courses.

More from this theme

Qualifications, Skills reform, T Levels

Revealed: 38 BTECs facing the chop to clear way for first T Levels

They're among 160 level 3 quals set to be defunded from 2024

Billy Camden
Qualifications, Skills reform

Level 2 qualifications review ‘materially flawed’

Providers and awarding organisations have had their say on the government's level 2 qualifications review. Here's what the sector...

Shane Chowen
Skills reform

DfE begins local skills improvement plans national rollout

It is hoped that “most” of the country will be covered by an LSIP by summer 2023

Will Nott
Skills reform

Ofqual voices concern over DfE reforms to level 2 and below qualifications

Plans risk adding confusion to landscape and 'overhwhelming' educators

Billy Camden
Skills reform

Delivery challenges ahead as skills bill finally gains royal assent

New laws will bring in an official list of post-16 skills providers and rules for increased apprenticeships guidance in...

Shane Chowen
Skills reform

Local skills improvement plans: What the trailblazer reports look like

Spanning over 500 pages in total, the “trailblazer” local skills improvement plans – a key plank of the government’s...

Shane Chowen

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

One comment

  1. We are a micro Training Provider who offer 12 month courses at level 3 which would be suitable for closing the skills gap. However, obtaining access to funding is difficult and limited due to availability of opportunities even though we are a Main Provider of Apprenticeships on the ROATP.