Ex-college principal banned from education

Former Hadlow boss to be fined £250k if he breaches agreement with liquidators, while deputy secures 'confidential' deal

Former Hadlow boss to be fined £250k if he breaches agreement with liquidators, while deputy secures 'confidential' deal


The principal of the first college to be put in administration has agreed to never work in the education sector again, FE Week can reveal.

In what is thought to be a sector first, Paul Hannan (pictured right) will be fined £250,000 if he breaches the ban which has been imposed following a three-year investigation by BDO, the liquidators for both Hadlow and West Kent and Ashford Colleges.

However, a secret deal has been struck between his deputy Mark Lumsdon-Taylor (pictured left) and BDO that keeps the details of his “undertaking” under wraps. Lumsdon-Taylor, who appears to have already agreed to pay £5,000, will be forced to pay further compensation if he breaches this confidential agreement, and on that basis the liquidators have withdrawn all claims against him in full.

Both leaders of the Hadlow Group resigned in 2019 after applying for emergency funding from the government to keep the colleges open, as Hadlow had run up £40 million in debts, while WKAC owed over £100 million.

The college entered the new education administration process later that year and were moved into liquidation in August 2022. Top Department for Education civil servants previously revealed how the process has cost the taxpayer around £60 million, with a “gut-wrenching” £6 million spent on administrators’ fees alone.

Hundreds of staff lost their jobs and thousands of students had to be moved to other colleges.

The government’s Insolvency Service has been investigating the conduct of the former leaders of the Hadlow Group since the catastrophe unfolded, but it concluded last year that “no further action” should be taken.

However, liquidators BDO have also been investigating the former directors and came to a different outcome.

A recently published creditors’ report states that the joint liquidators “undertook detailed investigations for over three years and intimated claims against Mr Paul Hannan in a letter before action”.

Hannan “disputed liability regarding the claims” and a “full and final settlement was reached on commercially acceptable grounds without any admission of specific liability”.

The settlement required an undisclosed “nominal initial payment”, which was received by the liquidators.

A “further payment of £250,000 in the event of breach of Mr Hannan’s personal undertaking not to take a position in the education sector as a trustee, director, governor, principal, manager, consultant and/or employee,” the report added.

It means that while Hannan has not received an outright directors’ ban from the Insolvency Service, he has been barred from working for another college.

FE Week could not reach Hannan for comment.

‘It’s right that those responsible are held to account’

Lumsdon-Taylor “strenuously disputed all liability”, according to the same BDO report, which revealed his settlement required an initial nominal payment of £5,000.

Lumsdon-Taylor has also “given an undertaking to the joint liquidators” but this is “subject to confidentiality provisions between the parties”.

In the event of a breach, Lumsdon-Taylor will “pay compensation and on that basis the joint liquidators have withdrawn all the claims in full”, the report said.

Responding to the report, a representative for Lumsdon-Taylor told FE Week: “The Hadlow College compulsory liquidation notice confirms that the joint liquidators have withdrawn all claims against Mark J Lumsdon-Taylor unequivocally and in full. This reconfirms our position that there was no case to answer for any ‘claims’ reported or otherwise stated. This matter is concluded.”

Lumsdon-Taylor refused to share any details about the undertaking he has agreed with the liquidators.

The Hadlow and West Kent insolvencies were the first carried out under the laws passed in 2017 which created a special administration regime for colleges.

Julian Gravatt, deputy chief executive of the Association of Colleges, said he is “fairly sure” that this is the first case in which liquidators have “agreed restrictions with former college employees”.

Gravatt said the insolvencies were “exceptional cases in a sector where leaders have an impressive track record of professionalism and skills at leading and managing complex organisations with great probity and integrity”.

“Where things go seriously wrong, it’s right that there are investigations and that those with responsibility are held to account for their actions,” he added.

The liquidators’ fees are different to the £6 million charges paid during the education administration process. BDO’s report reveals the joint liquidators have also racked up remuneration costs of more than £200,000 between August 2022 and August 2023, at an average rate of £175 per hour.

Significantly reduced hourly rates have however been agreed for this work between BDO and DfE. For example, standard charge out rates for a BDO partner ranges between £869 to £994 per hour, discounted to £320 for DfE, and for the £1,304 per hour rate for the BDO tax department has been discounted to £221 per hour.

The process and costs could drag on for years, with the creditors’ report revealing they may need to wait until 2026 for the college’s land at Court Lane to be sold. This is due to a “pre-emption agreement” which currently requires the land to be offered to a third party before it can be sold on the open market.

BDO said it could not provide any further detail than what is already included in its report.

More from this theme

Colleges, Skills reform

MPs: DfE should include FE in teacher recruitment forecasts

FE is the 'worst impacted' sector yet often ignored by DfE plans

Josh Mellor

Large south west college group announces new principal

Rob Bosworth will leave Exeter College after 24 years to lead Cornwall College Group

Billy Camden
Colleges, Employment

Lecturer wins over £50k from large college group for unfair dismissal

New City College bosses would not have fired lecturer if ‘fair procedure’ was followed, judge rules

Anviksha Patel

DfE ‘must increase support’ for AP school leavers entering FE

Children’s commissioner also says disrupted alternative provision pupils should be able to repeat year 11

Freddie Whittaker
Colleges, Ofsted

Waltham Forest named London’s only ‘outstanding’ general FE college

Inspectors heaped praise on the college for helping students to "flourish"

Josh Mellor
Colleges, FE Commissioner

Wolverhampton college freed from intervention after 12 years

The college's financial health improved to 'good' after DfE agreed to take on part of a £10m debt

Josh Mellor


  1. why are these two sitting in front of a framed WALL STREET photo?

    the utter arrogance of these two imbeciles, quite clearly motivated by a desire to be WALL STREET operators, but at the expense of the taxpayer

    – id invite them to come to work with me for a day in the private sector where the illusion of Hollywood is far from reality, and jumped up school teachers dont get to throw large sums of tax payers dosh around whilst pretending to have penises

    what on earth are you doing public sector?

    is this photo actually real?

    • Adebayo Asolo

      Trying to get my head round this. Were the guys corrupt in which case they should have been referred to the police? Or was it just a case of financial misapplication therefore a matter of administrative enquiry? The outcome still effectively protected the career of both maybe not in the education sector but would they care! Where is the punishment for sinking 2 foremost schools which unsettled the careers of many lecturers and forced many to take early and unplanned retirement.
      The punishment is softer than a slap in the wrist

    • Dave Spart

      The valid points made in your first two paragraphs are undermined by the offensive nonsense that follows. “jumped up schoolteachers” should know their place, eh? And I can only interpret the utterly bizarre “pretending to have penises” as not only deeply misogynist, but an example of the very neanderthal machismo that you appear to be criticising them for. And your apparent attempt to portray this as somehow a failure of the “public sector”, as though corruption and/or incompetence don’t exist in the private sector, is idiotic.

      • Well said, Dave.
        MLT wasn’t ever a ‘school teacher’. Neither was he ever a lecturer. He is a privately educated posh boy from the private sector “playing” at running a college after doing a bit of auditing for the education sector. We could do without his brand of private sector innovation.

        There’s always the question of was it criminal or was it sheer incompetence? Almost certainly both in my opinion. A quick search of this website will remind ourselves that MLT specifically tried to draw down college funding by doctoring evidence from the Education Skills Funding Agency. That sounds suspiciously like fraud and yet he’s been exonerated? More likely the CPS concluded it wasn’t in the public interest to take the matter further. After all, such a case would show how weak the DfE was in allowing these people so much control. Cynical? The FE sector tends to do that to lecturing staff.

        • Nice touch – bit of personal bullying and jealousy coming through. Reckon you’re on the ‘libel’ line there. Shame you’re not ‘angry’…….any good you would rise above a basic lecturer. He did transform the college, and probably gave you a job. Grow up. And yes I have the balls to display my name.

  2. david priestly

    Delighted to see Mr Lumsdon-Taylor exonerated. Paul Hannan has been held to account as chief operating officer. Judging by him giving a statement makes it clear in the eyes of the law, the legislation, that he did nothing wrong.

    Shame about the process – very political and Mary Ney report ‘slammed’ the FEC.
    Well done!

    • Hadlow Concerned

      I’m sure they cared a lot about the learners as they diverted college money onto themselves through excessive expenses and novelty projects that took money away from learners. I bet they cared at the golf course during the work day and at fancy restaurants that picked up the tab.

  3. Oh dear. Sorry for Paul Hannan. Left the sector in disgrace and now humiliated as a man that didn’t do his job after 30 years.

    Question remains who set it all off? As a former employee my money is on the SMT and a night of long knives. Interesting to see MLT cleared. Why would he share any details – he is in the clear, whether that’s right or wrong has been decide by the courts.

    • junkshop

      Yes, people that did nothing wrong routinely pay thousands of pounds in compensation for the wrong things they didn’t do.

      No deals were made here.

      There are no birds.

      There are no seats.

  4. Albert Wright

    “….. Hadlow had run up £40 million in debts, while WKAC owed over £100 million.”

    How can this have happened without anyone being responsible?

    Are there no regulators in the FE sector? Who were the people that failed to act?

    To whom were the debts owed ? Have they no way of recovering their losses?