West Yorkshire’s 10% boost for adult education

West Yorkshire Combined Authority follows Greater London and West Midlands for inflation-matching AEB rise

West Yorkshire Combined Authority follows Greater London and West Midlands for inflation-matching AEB rise

West Yorkshire Combined Authority has agreed to raise its adult education budget in line with inflation to address “genuine concern” from providers over soaring costs.

The boost follows a 3.5 per cent increase for Greater London to adult learning at GCSE level and below, while the West Midlands Combined Authority announced in December a 10 per cent uplift to its adult education budget (AEB) for this year.

West Yorkshire Combined Authority agreed the 10 per cent rise for its formula-funded AEB, applied retrospectively for all enrolments at level 2 and below for 2022/23.

Tracy Brabin, the authority’s Labour mayor, said: “Without this uplift in funding rates, providers report a genuine concern they would have had to reduce their offer to learners in West Yorkshire, reducing hours of courses, increasing class sizes and reducing teaching assistant support. Some providers may even have had to stop provision which is no longer viable.

“This is clearly not a situation we could have accepted as it would have reduced the quality of adult education provision in West Yorkshire.”

The current West Yorkshire AEB budget for 2022/23 is £66.4 million, according to the authority’s report.

It helped support 43,000 individuals in 2021/22 – the first year it took control of the AEB pot – with key priorities that year including boosting digital skills, increasing level 3 qualifications and tackling areas of skills shortages.

The authority’s report said that frozen funding rates over the last decade, exacerbated by inflation and rising costs, meant providers were struggling to recruit qualified staff.

It also warned that a rate rise will likely mean a reduction in the number of people supported, estimated to be around 10 per cent fewer learners as a result of a 10 per cent uplift in funding.

“A rate increase for providers means that the same value of funding spreads across fewer learners. We cannot afford to increase provider allocation in line with the rate increase,” the authority said.

However, that is not expected to impact community learning numbers as that uses a different funding methodology.

The authority has also pledged to continue lobbying the government for an increase in devolved adult educating funding.

More from this theme

Adult education, Devolution, Politics

Local elections: What mayoral hopefuls have to say on skills

Elections are set to take place on May 2

Josh Mellor
Adult education

First Holex CEO revealed

Caroline McDonald will assume the position of the membership body’s first chief executive from August

Anviksha Patel
Adult education

Holex on the hunt for first CEO

New chief will work alongside policy director Susan Pember

Shane Chowen
Adult education, Devolution

WEA threatens legal action against combined authority amid grant funding row

A decision to refuse to grant fund the WEA puts 70 jobs at risk

Shane Chowen
Adult education

Adult ed: Fewer adults taking level 2 and 3 courses

Figures indicate fewer adults from deprived backgrounds

Shane Chowen
Adult education

Multiply boosts adult education numbers

Adult education numbers are slightly up on last year with rising demand for ESOL and free level 3 courses

Shane Chowen

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One comment

  1. “Without this uplift in funding rates, providers report a genuine concern they would have had to reduce their offer to learners in West Yorkshire, reducing hours of courses, increasing class sizes and reducing teaching assistant support. Some providers may even have had to stop provision which is no longer viable.”

    But this will happen anyway! If the funding allocation is the same, but rates are increased, then fewer learners are needed for the budget to be spent, resulting in a reduced offer. (fewer learners = fewer teachers = fewer teaching assistants = same result).

    What we really have here is a problem with the calibre of leaders. On one side funding budgets are stagnant but decision makers busy themselves dodging responsibility. On the other side the desire for political point scoring and ‘optics’ overrides committing any brain cells to understanding simple concepts.

    I have to admit, sometimes it feels as though I’m trapped in some nightmarish low budget sitcom.