T Level funding to be lagged from 2027

Switch will end the use of estimated student numbers but keep in-year reconciliation

Switch will end the use of estimated student numbers but keep in-year reconciliation

Funding allocations for T Levels will be lagged from 2027, the Department for Education has confirmed. 

Guidance published this week says allocations for colleges and schools will be based “solely on student numbers from the start of the previous year”. It means the use of estimated student numbers will end, but in-year reconciliation will continue. The current registration process for new T Level providers will also be scrapped.

The change will bring T Levels in line with other 16 to 19 study programmes, which are already funded through a lagged model. It means a college’s T Level funding allocation for academic year 2027-28 will be based on the number of students the college says it has in its individualised learner record (ILR) data return (R04) in November 2026.

T Level allocations are currently worked out using “carry-over” students from ILR and provider estimates of new starters submitted each autumn. Those estimates are then checked against actual enrolments later in the year. Funding is then adjusted through a reconciliation process. 

T Level recruitment has repeatedly fallen short of expectations. A National Audit Office report earlier this year found starts on the flagship qualifications were as much as 75 per cent below government targets. 

Funding colleges based on last year’s students rather than estimates gives colleges some certainty over how much funding they’ll get, but can also leave them exposed to financial risks if student numbers rise suddenly.

Lagged flaws

Colleges are currently grappling with surging numbers of 16 to 19 year olds, with DfE placing limits on how much growth can be funded in-year.

 Julian Gravatt, deputy chief executive of the Association of Colleges, said there was an  “administrative logic” to the T Level funding change, but “only if we’re at a point where enrolment levels are fairly predictable and manageable.” 

He told FE Week: “The main 16-18 funding system works well in some respects in that it gives colleges a year to adjust their staffing and costs to take account of changing enrolment numbers but it’s working badly in other respects because there is a rising population of young people, an increasing demand for technical subjects, DfE’s budgets are fixed on an April to March cycle and student choices aren’t confirmed until the second half of August.

“Meanwhile fixed budgets and rising demand leave thousands of young people without places each autumn.”

Latest education roles from

Head of Welfare and Student Finance

Head of Welfare and Student Finance

Capital City College Group

Assistant Principal – West London College

Assistant Principal – West London College

FEA

Headteacher

Headteacher

Tenax Schools Trust

Head of Finance

Head of Finance

Jewish Community Academy Trust

Sponsored posts

Sponsored post

What you missed in the post-16 consultation response

With the publication of the government’s response to the post-16 skills pathway consultation, there’s been lots of media outlets...

Advertorial
Sponsored post

Apprenticeship reform: An opportunity to future‑proof skills and unlock career pathways

The apprenticeship landscape is undergoing one of its most significant transformations in decades, and that’s good news for learners,...

Advertorial
Sponsored post

Stronger learners start with supported educators

Further Education (FE) and skills professionals show up every day to change lives. They problem-solve, multi-task and can carry...

Advertorial
Sponsored post

Preparing learners for work, not just exams: the case for skills-led learning

As further education (FE) continues to adapt to shifting labour markets, digital transformation and widening participation agendas, providers are...

Advertorial

More from this theme

Colleges

WCG exits intervention

The college has agreed loans and campus sales to rebalance the books

Josh Mellor
Colleges, Young people

Population-spiked colleges scrabble for cash ahead of real-terms funding cut

Real-terms base rate cut of 0.5% could force principals to reevaluate provision and staff pay

Anviksha Patel
Colleges

Free meals funding frozen in FE while schools rate rises

College leaders bite back at ‘insulting’ DfE decision

Josh Mellor
Colleges

Ministers accused of breaking 16–19 funding promise with 0.5% rate rise

An uplift on older T Level courses will also be removed in the new academic year

Anviksha Patel

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One comment

  1. David Hilton

    So, if I’m correct an impact of this could be that colleges are enrolling unrealistic numbers if students on T-level courses putting the burden on teachers and lecturers. Another impact will be that we are chunneling learners on wrong courses with the aim of getting student numbers up.