Small businesses should pay into an ‘apprenticeship and skills levy’, says think tank

Radical shake-up of apprenticeship levy proposed by EDSK says small firms should pay into the pot

Radical shake-up of apprenticeship levy proposed by EDSK says small firms should pay into the pot

A former skills adviser to the government has proposed a radical overhaul of the apprenticeship levy that would see nearly all small and medium sized businesses having to pay into the pot.

Business leaders however warn it will be a “retrograde measure” and “yet another tax burden detrimental to the economic growth that springs from SMEs”.

The EDSK think tank has published a report called ‘Changing Courses’ which proposes to split the current apprenticeship levy into separate funds for apprenticeships and skills training, with more businesses paying into it.

Report authors Tom Richmond – a former adviser to Department for Education ministers – and Eleanor Regan propose converting the levy into an ‘apprenticeships and skills levy’ which would see all businesses with 10 employees or more contribute 0.4 per cent of their annual payroll costs to the fund.

That cash would then be distributed to firms in two pots – a national apprenticeship fund to deliver apprenticeships, and a national skills fund to deliver non-apprenticeship skills training.

The national apprenticeship fund would cover apprenticeships up to level 6, and include traineeships.

The national skills fund would then be devolved to mayoral authorities where possible, and be used to upskill or re-skill existing workforces.

In addition, EDSK says the adult education budget and free courses for jobs fund – a flagship government scheme to offer a free first level 3 qualification to those who do not have one or who are unemployed – into a single devolved ‘local skills fund’.

It also wants a right to paid training leave to be introduced enabling employees to access up to five days of paid leave per year for skills or training courses. Employers would be reimbursed a flat £20 per hour rate for those workers to enable it to arrange cover.

The report said that under the proposals, the number of levy-paying businesses would rise from around 23,000 to 278,000, and raise an estimated £3.8 billion per year – £1.1 billion more than the current system.

Presently, only employers with a wage bill of £3 million or more pay into the apprenticeship levy, at a rate of 0.5 per cent of their annual wage bill.

But EDSK said that the current system, introduced in 2017, isn’t effective enough.

It recognised that the levy had increased employer awareness of apprenticeships, but said goals from the outset were “vague”.

The think tank highlighted that often employers were opting for higher level courses to use up levy funds. The report also warned that more than 50 per cent of apprenticeships are “fake”, with employers effectively rebadging their existing training as an apprenticeship in order to fund it through levy cash. Many had apprentices working for the company more than three months prior to their apprenticeship starting.

The report said it had “undermined the apprenticeship brand and wasted a considerable amount of time, money and effort”.

It added: “By moving away from only funding ‘apprenticeships’ and large qualifications to instead supporting more flexible (and often shorter) forms of training such as non-qualification courses and individual units of qualifications, employers, employees and government can all expect better value for money and larger returns on their respective investments.”

But the plans have not been welcomed by the Federation of Small Businesses, which warned that another tax on small firms would be too much for some.

Tina McKenzie, policy chair at the FSB said the levy was designed to encourage small businesses to take up apprenticeships funded by contributions from bigger firms.

“Undermining this fundamental aspect of the system would be a retrograde measure; yet another tax burden detrimental to the economic growth that springs from SMEs, and fewer apprentices would be trained,” she said.

“Broadening the apprenticeship levy to a training levy, could further reduce the number of apprenticeships available in smaller businesses. Small firms already provide significant training opportunities; they could provide even more which could be done through tax training relief. Adding another tax to them will have the opposite outcome.”

England’s largest apprenticeship provider, Lifetime Training, said a period of stability is needed for the levy. Matt Robinson, commercial director added: “Potentially imposing the levy on smaller businesses would be another pressure and potentially force apprenticeships in environments where it would be difficult to provide off the job and mentor support effectively.

“Instead, we would welcome the ability for large employers to transfer funds more easily to smaller businesses by transferring directly between digital accounts.”

EDSK acknowledged that there could be some resistance from smaller employers to the proposals, but said that “every employer needed to have a stake in the training system”.

Firms with 10 to 49 employers would likely only pay between £1,700 and £4,200 per year, making it a “relatively minor investment”, the report said.

“Even though these smaller organisations are now being asked to contribute to the ASL [apprenticeships and skills levy], they will be able to access financial support for apprenticeships and other forms of training that far exceeds their nominal contribution through the ASL,” it added.

Sector leaders have long called for changes to the apprenticeship system since the levy’s launch. Some business chiefs, such as the Confederation of British Industry, have previously called for it to be transformed into a wider skills and training levy.

EDSK’s report comes ahead of potential changes to the apprenticeship levy as part of a review announced by former chancellor Rishi Sunak.

In his spring statement in March, Sunak said he would examine the levy’s effectiveness, although the Treasury later denied it was a formal review.

A spokesperson from the DfE said the levy was an “important part of our reforms” and pledged £2.7 billion in apprenticeship funding by 2024/25.

They added: “We continue to improve apprenticeships, making them more flexible for employers in all sectors and making it easier for employers to transfer their unused funds.”

More from this theme


New off-the-job apprenticeship flexibility set for 2024/25

Active learning can take place every 3 months from August for front-loaded or block release apprenticeships

Billy Camden

EPA on trial: DfE to test alternative apprenticeship assessments

Several options are on the table to speed up apprenticeship assessments...but at what cost?

Shane Chowen

Shared apprenticeship scheme barely meets half its recruitment target

Flexible construction apprenticeship starts tumble amid sector-wide recruitment issues

Anviksha Patel
Apprenticeships, Ofsted

Uni caught short after fast-tracking degree apprenticeship for NHS

Ofsted found some employers' operational needs for advanced clinical practitioners weren't being met

Josh Mellor
Apprenticeships, Training Providers

Kaplan knocks Lifetime Training off apprenticeship levy top spot

Finance giant topped earners list in 2021/22, as Multiverse entered the top 10

Billy Camden

MoJ’s prison service U-turns on mandatory apprenticeships

Training requirements ‘put strain’ on prison safety, HMPPS says as thousands of custody officers drop out

Billy Camden

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


  1. “Employers are a critical piece of the skills puzzle, but others have equally important views, perspectives and feedback to share.”

    Shame that the report research didn’t include the Federation of Small Businesses, the AELP or the Association of Apprentices.

    You would think that the SME viewpoint would have some value in a report like this. Perhaps also the body that represents Independent Training Providers who deliver around 70% of apprenticeships. Or even a body representing apprentices themselves…

    But instead, we have a report based on interviews with academics, quango’s, ex civil servants and other think tanks. It recommends creating a new culture and attitude towards skills training, yet doesn’t include the views of those directly involved – Sounds like an education and skills dictatorship!

    The report takes a swipe at policy makers; “ministers offered no clear aims and objectives for what it was supposed to achieve, save for occasional mentions of vague aspirations such as raising our nation’s productivity”.

    The report then concludes; “generating this new culture and attitude towards skills and training is crucial to boosting the productivity and growth…”.

    I would suggest that is equally as vague…

    The levy was always about the Treasury getting some public expenditure off the balance sheet, this appears to be extending that further and promoting loans (ie socialising debt and baking in wealth inequality). It just cobbles together the same fashionable buzz words and phrases in a slightly different order.

  2. Totally Agree with TTP comments.
    As usual common sense has totally by passed this ‘think tank’ ……anyone who actually works with SMEs, provides apprenticeship training to our communities and sectors and who are the actual experts in this field should be the ones leading these types of reviews.
    The previous introduction of the Levy was always going to be used to ‘rebadge’ large employers training and use up their funds to support internal training with the management qualifications thus becoming the highest apprenticeship starts on record! Anyone In apprenticeships knew that would happen!. Now with the cost of living rises, higher staff costs, increasing rent/leases and less client spend, most SMEs will be lucky to survive and now a proposal of a SME Levy!! Stop thinking so short term…SMEs need help not more expenses!! Do the EDSK actually realise SMEs make up 95% of our economy so to say: Firms with 10 to 49 employers would likely only pay between £1,700 and £4,200 per year, making it a “relatively minor investment”, the report said. They obviously haven’t ran a small business before and after Covid especially SMEs are still recovering from loans and grants to keep them going……OMG Who are these people and what planet are they on??