Ofsted watch: Success for employer-provider but college falls two grades from ‘outstanding’

An employer-provider has boosted its grade to ‘good’ in a mixed week for the FE sector, as Highbury College dramatically dropped two ratings from ‘outstanding’.

Be Wiser Insurance Services was rated grade two across the board, up from its previous ‘requires improvement’ rating.

The main reason for its achievement was put down to a reduction in the scale of its apprenticeship provision since the last inspection – from 475 to just 31.

All current learners are on apprenticeships in financial services.

“Leaders have taken prompt and decisive action to improve the quality of apprenticeships and have successfully addressed the areas identified as requiring improvement at the previous inspection and through their self-assessment,” Ofsted said.

“Potential apprentices start as full-time employees and benefit from excellent information, advice and guidance during a five-week ‘take the first steps towards a career’ period, before they make the decision to enrol on the apprenticeship programmes.”

Inspectors added that during their off-the-job training, apprentices benefit from “good-quality teaching and learning supported by high-quality training resources”.

Continuing with the ‘good’ news, two adult and community learning providers retained their grade two ratings following short inspections this week.

These were achieved by Durham County Council and Medway Council.

Meanwhile, one private training provider based in Stockton-On-Tees – KT Associates – was found to be making “reasonable progress” in its first monitoring visit since its ‘inadequate’ rating in December.

Safeguarding at the small loans-only provider, which had 220 learners at the time of inspection in December, was the main focus of the monitoring visit after it was previously found to be “not effective”.

However, Ofsted inspectors found that “following the previous inspection, leaders swiftly revised their policies and procedures relating to safeguarding and these are now compliant with the most recent legislation”.

All current policies are now “fit for purpose”.

Leaders “quickly held a series of workshops” for staff and learners around “conflict resolution, staying safe at work, broader safeguarding issues and the ‘Prevent’ duty”.

Onto the not so good news: Highbury College dropped two grades from ‘outstanding’ in an Ofsted report that branded its teaching “uninspiring” and raised concern over low attendance.

It was deemed to be grade one when the watchdog last inspected in 2011.

“Leaders and governors have been slow to reverse the college’s decline in performance,” the new report warned.

Leaders’ and managers’ “evaluation of the quality of provision, particularly teaching, learning and assessment” is “overoptimistic”, though governors were recognised for having a “good oversight” of most areas of the college.

Inspectors warned that “overall performance has declined and they have not been effective in challenging and supporting senior leaders to stem this decline”.

“Too much teaching is uninspiring and attendance at most lessons is low.”

The verdict was a serious blow to a heavily criticised leadership team led by Stella Mbubaegbu, who insisted that the college has “already embarked on our journey back to ‘outstanding’”.

Lastly, one independent learning provider also achieved an overall ‘requires improvement’ rating.

Eurosource Solutions Limited, based in Staffordshire, was given the grade three in its first ever inspection.

It has 141 adult learners enrolled on certificate and diploma courses in health and social care, early years and supporting teaching and learning.

“Leaders have not implemented quickly enough the actions needed to improve the quality of adult learning programmes,” inspectors said.

They also criticised the provider for not having a governing body, which means leaders are “not challenged or held to account for improving the quality of adult learning programmes”.

“Training advisers set imprecise and vague targets with learners,” Ofsted found. “As a result, too many learners do not make the progress expected of them.”

 

GFE Colleges Inspected Published Grade Previous grade
Highbury College 23/04/2018 07/06/3028 3 1

 

Independent Learning Providers Inspected Published Grade Previous grade
Eurosource Solutions Limited 01/05/2018 08/06/2018 3 0
KT Associates 01/05/2018 07/06/2018 M M

 

Employer providers Inspected Published Grade Previous grade
Be Wiser Insurance Services 15/05/2018 06/06/2018 2 3

 

Short inspections (remains grade 2) Inspected Published
Durham County Council 01/05/2018 08/06/2018
Medway Council 02/05/2018 08/06/2018

UCU college strike action continues to win concessions

The University and College Union is continuing to win concessions in the current round of college strikes, as it gears up for an autumn of discontent on pay.

Bosses at Capital City College Group reached a deal with staff to end a long-running pay dispute, just days after UCU members voted unanimously to escalate action nationwide if the Association of Colleges failed to meet 2018/19 pay claim demands.

Meanwhile, a strike at Havering College in east London went ahead as planned on June 7 and 8, the last concerning this year’s pay claim.

A spokesperson for the college said exams had been held as scheduled “with the support and hard work of both academic and business support staff”.

Strikes at the three colleges that make up the Capital City College Group – City and Islington College, Westminster Kingsway College and the College of Haringey, Enfield and North East London – were called off on June 5.

Bosses offered staff a “modest, non-consolidated payment” and more secure contracts.

A payment of £500 per full-time member of staff came in addition to the one-per-cent increase recommended by the AoC last September.

CCCG’s group chief executive Andy Wilson said in a tweet that it was “good to reward colleagues for contribution to merger and long-standing substantive hourly-paid more secure contracts”.

Andrew Harden, UCU’s head of FE, said that the group has also committed to further pay talks when Mr Wilson leaves and a new chief executive is in post come the next academic year.

Members have “made it clear” they will ballot for strike action again if the “promised negotiations over a new local pay bargaining framework does not result in a meaningful pay award for 2018/19”.

There are now no further strikes over this year’s pay settlement planned at any college before the summer recess.

At the union’s Congress in Manchester on May 31, members voted unanimously to support a motion asking the AoC to “make an early offer that meets members’ expectations”.

They also threatened to “ballot members nationally for escalating strike action” if its demands weren’t met.

The joint FE unions, which include Unison, Unite, GMB and the National Education Union as well as UCU, have submitted a claim for a five-per-cent raise or £1,500, whichever is higher.

The AoC had refused to come to the table over next year’s claim while disputes over this year’s are ongoing, but soon backed down.

A third wave of action at 10 colleges or campuses over the one-per-cent offer the AoC made for 2017/18 was announced early in May.

Four have now reached agreements, with Sandwell College agreeing a “sector-leading” deal worth more than six per cent over three years.

A strike over job cuts at Bradford College was called off at the last minute, after it agreed to reopen its voluntary redundancy scheme.

Elsewhere, staff at Hull College are planning a seven-day walk out later this month over plans to slash jobs. They will strike for an initial five days from June 18, and then again on June 26 and 27.

The college announced in March it would have to cut the equivalent of 231 full-time posts in a bid to balance the books.

Staff have already staged a three-day walkout over the proposals, which the union says would result in a third of the workforce being cut.

UCU’s regional official Julie Kelley said the latest action is necessary as “the college is not responding to our concerns about the impact these cuts would have for staff, students and the local community”.

A college spokesperson said it would do “everything possible” to avoid disruptions to exams while the strike is on.

“It is disappointing and unclear why this decision has been taken, following recent positive meetings outlining the successful reduction of proposed compulsory redundancies,” they claimed.

 

Council accused of SEND transport discrimination

A local authority has been accused of breaking government guidelines on college transport charges, and parents of children with special educational needs or disabilities are worried about discrimination.

St Helens council provoked an angry response from local families, after it announced that 16- to 19-year-old SEND learners will have to pay over £1,700 every year for transport to their colleges or the special-needs sixth-form where many will study from September.

Natspec, which represents specialist further education providers, believes this contravenes a requirement on local authorities to ensure special-needs learners have reasonable choice over where they study.

“The DfE post-16 transport guidance is clear that LA policies must act reasonably and take into account the needs of different groups, particularly young people with SEND,” said its chief executive Clare Howard.

“While we accept budgets are stretched and councils may not be able to provide free transport, elements of the St Helens policy do not appear to follow the guidance, in particular the requirement to give young people reasonable choice of education provision.”

The DfE’s post-16 transport to education and training guidance calls on local authorities to “ensure” young people have “reasonable opportunities” to choose the most suitable education establishment, taking into account SEND requirements.

An investigation last year by FE Week found that two thirds of councils now charge post-16 SEND learners for transport. It is feared this is deterring many from travelling longer distances to attend courses that would better suited to their needs.

The annual charge by St Helens – a metropolitan borough council – is £300 higher than the costliest county council, Hertfordshire, and is among the highest charges in the country.

Liz Maudsley, a senior policy manager at the Association of Colleges, is unhappy at the figures involved.

“We are very concerned to see the exceptionally high travel costs for SEND learners being charged by some. In our view, this contravenes DfE guidance that SEN learners should have a choice in where they study,” she said.

“We will continue to raise this issue with DfE.”

Chris Valentine-Smith has a 16-year-old son Ethan with Down’s Syndrome and autism. He is supposed to be transferring from September to Mill Green Special Needs Sixth-Form College in St Helens.

“I can understand that the council needs to make a charge, but the amount they’re asking is totally unreasonable. There is no way we can afford to pay, so it’s going to jeopardise his future education. It really feels like SEN learners are being heavily discriminated against,” she said.

“Most neighbouring authorities charge nothing, including Wigan council, which has a far more humane approach. It seems like there’s a postcode lottery going on.”

Wigan council does not charge and FE Week understands it is currently funding transport for a post-16 SEND learner to attend Mill Green.

A letter sent to the council by parents of St Helens SEND learners, including Mr Valentine-Smith, claims they are being discriminated against.

It said the £1,700 charge they face “compares to public transport charges for a non-SEN student of approximately £250 for a bus pass for a year”.

“So a SEN student is being asked to pay approximately £1,450 more than a non-SEN student directly as a result of their disability in these cases.”

“Many students and families will not pay the full charge, as there is a 75-per-cent discount for families entitled to free school meals, who are in receipt of universal credit / income support, or the highest level of working tax credit,” a St Helens spokesperson said.

“The public consultation noted that the average cost of a place on authority provided post-16 transport is over £5,100 per student. As such, even following the introduction of charges, the authority will continue to provide a significant subsidy (on average £3,400 per place) towards the overall cost.”

The DfE has been approached for comment.

Hull College’s vast debts exposed

An impoverished college which took a £54 million bailout did so after declaring a deficit of close to £13 million in a single year.

The revelation emerged from Hull College’s long-delayed 2015/16 accounts, which were finally published this week following pressure from FE Week.

There have widespread demands for greater transparency on the college’s dire financial situation, and last year’s accounts are still firmly under wraps.

The college “generated a deficit in the year of £9,329,000 before taxation” in 2015/16, compared with a much smaller loss of £492,000 the previous year. In addition to pension liabilities this left it with an overall deficit of £12.8 million.

As a result, its reserves had plummeted to negative £7,827,000 over the year, according to the accounts.

The college did not comment on the situation before FE Week went to press.

“How did they get in this mess? That’s something I’d really like to know,” asked Emma Hardy, one of three local MPs and a member of the influential commons education select committee.

“What safeguards or checks were not in place to allow the college to get into such financial difficulties? Why weren’t things identified earlier or problems dealt with earlier?”

Information about the college’s finances has been thin on the ground since the FE commissioner began his intervention 18 months ago.

His report, published last January, said the college had a “cumulative deficit of around £10 million over the past four years”, and a “further deficit in excess of £1 million” was forecast for 2016/17.

FE Week learned of the £54 million bailout from a member of staff from the college attending last week’s University and College Union congress in Manchester, as previously reported in the Hull Daily Mail.

It’s believed to be the highest single payout from the restructuring facility, but neither the college nor the government would confirm the figure, citing a confidentiality agreement.

Julie Kelley, UCU’s regional official, told FE Week that the college has refused to say where the money was going or what strings were attached.

“The only thing they will say is that a condition of the grant is that they have to get their staff costs under control,” she said.

“But because we don’t know what the underlying financial issues are we have no clear picture of how the college has gotten into the state that it’s gotten into.”

In addition to the as-yet-unpublished 2016/17 accounts, there is no sign of governing board meeting minutes on the college’s website.

It took three days to respond to a request from FE Week to see those minutes, and when the documents arrived they were heavily redacted.

Whole sections, including the CEO’s update, were marked “closed, commercially sensitive”.

A spokesperson defended the secrecy, insisting it “takes an honest and open approach to all our communications”.

“However, the terms of our grant agreement imposes certain restrictions on the disclosure of any information deemed not for public release at this point in time,” he said.

Any redactions were made “to minimise any breach of the agreement” or to its legal obligations on redundancy consultations.

Staff at the college are currently fighting leaders over plans to slash more than 200 full-time staff, and seven days of strike are planned for later this month.

Meanwhile, Mark Dawe, the boss of the Association of Employment and Learning Providers, hit out at the government over the lack of transparency surrounding this and other similar deals.

“How can it be that government funding of £54 million to a public body isn’t fully in the public domain?” he asked.

However, a spokesperson for the Department for Education defended the need for confidentiality over funds awarded to colleges from the restructuring facility.

“Publishing this information before the end of the programme could prejudice commercial interest,” she said.

Only a quarter of prospective T-level pioneers were successful

Only a quarter of the providers which applied to offer T-levels in 2020 were successful, and many of those left off the list are confused about why.

Names of the 52 providers that will pilot the prestigious new technical qualifications were announced by the Department for Education late last month.

A spokesperson told FE Week they had selected from more than 200 expressions of interest.

But while 26 colleges made the cut, many – including New City College in London – were told they weren’t eligible as they had grade two ratings from Ofsted.

Published criteria had stated that providers rated either ‘good’ or ‘outstanding’ were eligible to apply.

Gerry McDonald, the college’s group principal and chief executive, said the decision “contradicts the policy messages we had been given”.

The college had been “very active in the development of T-levels”, with both the college and employer partners “getting prepared” and “keen to move forward”.

“I am confused by this decision and I will be following this up with the department,” he said.

Other big college groups to have missed out include NCG and Capital City College Group, both of which applied.

Only three of the 21 providers involved in the T-level work placement pilot will be offering new the courses in 2020.

These are Blackpool and the Fylde College, Truro and Penwith College, and Access to Music, an independent training provider.

Among those to have missed out was grade two Bolton College. Its director of curriculum Sharon Marriott described the decision-making criteria as “utterly flawed”.

By using ‘outstanding’ as a yardstick, she said, the DfE had “virtually excluded the sector who are expected to deliver the T-levels”.

Peter Mayhew-Smith, principal of grade two South Thames College, was “disappointed” not to have been chosen.

In January this year the Education and Skills Funding Agency invited expressions of interest from providers which wanted to become the first to offer T-levels.

As well as the ‘good’ or ‘outstanding’ criterion, applicants needed at least ‘satisfactory’ financial health to be eligible.

If there was “significant interest”, however, the agency said it would apply additional checks to reach a “manageable number” of candidates, including giving priority to grade one providers.

It would also take steps to ensure there were providers across the range of types, and from the DfE’s opportunity areas, as set out in the government’s social mobility action plan published last December.

Of the 52 providers chosen, 32 are ‘outstanding’ and 14 are ‘good’, while a further six don’t have a current Ofsted rating.

Five of these are academies that were rated ‘outstanding’ before they converted, and the sixth is a university technical college that has yet to be inspected.

“The 52 colleges and providers were picked to deliver the first wave of the new T-levels based on published criteria set out earlier this year,” a DfE spokesperson said.

“This set out that successful colleges must, among other things, be ‘good’ or ‘outstanding’.”

Just three T-levels will be launched for teaching in 2020/21, in digital, construction, and education and childcare.

Full roll-out has been delayed until 2023, amid concerns about the planned pace of implementation.

But education secretary Damian Hinds has refused a request from his permanent secretary to delay the pilot to 2021 and is “convinced of the case to press ahead”.

Let’s not be so quick to plan a raid on the levy pot

Readers of FE Week will be familiar with the excruciatingly slow start to the apprenticeship levy reforms since last May.

According to the Department for Education, employers spent just 10 per cent (£200 million out of £2 billion) of their levy contributions in the first year. Each month that three million starts target slips further away.

Inevitably, there are more demands for a change of course, anything from scrapping the target to scrapping the Institute for Apprenticeships, but as I’ve explained before and won’t repeat now, it is far too soon to panic.

But this does raise questions about what will happen to any unspent funding, particularly when public finances are tight.

This week the eight metro mayors signed a joint statement asking the government to let them raid unspent funds to boost devolved education budgets from August 2019.

It is an attractive pitch, but there are at least five compelling reasons why it would be a mistake.

1. The apprenticeship reforms have been designed on the basis that many employers will fail to use all of the levy. Why? Because without unspent levy there would be no funding for small, non-levy-paying employers, English and maths qualifications, employer and provider incentives, and the 10-per-cent levy account top-ups.

2. Apprenticeship providers say they have demand from small employers but not enough nonlevy funding, so they should be first in the queue when large employers choose not to use their funds.

3. Unspent funding could be used to incentive the growth of apprenticeships where a market intervention is needed. For example, the government will pay £1,000 to care leavers who start an apprenticeship from this August. They could also increase incentives to recruit 16- to 18-year-olds, either fully-funding them or increasing the £1,000 employer incentive.

4. Many employers are waiting for standards to become available for delivery (over 280 are currently in development according the IfA) and have 24 months to spend their levy money before losing access to it. Raiding it now would likely result in a significant overspend in a year’s time.

5. The government is making it easier for large employers to use their levy, by allowing them to transfer up to 10 per cent to those in their supply chain.

So although I’m sure the mayors won’t be alone in eyeing up a slice of levy pie, long term underspend may not even be crumbs.

Fresh trouble for NCG as its flagship free school is forced to close

A free school sponsored by England’s largest college group, and which is led by some of its top people, is closing down.

The Discovery School in Newcastle, which cost £9 million to set up, opened in 2014.

It will shut this year over “capability and capacity issues” that have concerned ministers.

Last July, the school was rated ‘inadequate’ at its first inspection by Ofsted, while it expects to receive another in its next, imminent visit from the watchdog.

Three high-ranking NCG employees have been “members” of Discovery ever since it opened. Their responsibilities included appointing the school’s board of trustees – who ultimately oversaw its collapse and failed to turn it around.

These include NCG’s current chief executive Joseph Docherty, its group director of strategic partnerships Chris Payne, and its director of property services Jeff McCall.

Joseph Docherty

On top of this, Discovery’s chair of trustees, is Gerard Garvey – the principal of Newcastle Sixth-Form College, which is part of NCG.

The group has attempted to distance itself from criticism and lay blame with the trustees.

“As sponsor NCG is only responsible for the appointment of the board and has no further powers to interfere in the running of the school,” a spokesperson said.

“It is the board of directors of Discovery Learning Ltd that has total responsibility for all aspects of running Discovery School, including the design of the curriculum, the quality of provision, safeguarding of students, and the appointment or dismissal of all staff, including the principal.

“This is a very clear and deliberate legal separation of responsibilities.”

Mr Garvey’s roles at Discovery and as principal of Newcastle Sixth-Form College are meanwhile “completely separate”, she added.

Discovery was heavily criticised by Ofsted, has suffered from low student numbers, and was forced to launch an urgent review of its safeguarding procedures after a pupil was left in London following a school trip to the capital.

The 14-year-old was left at King’s Cross station when the rest of his group boarded the train two months ago.

Mr Garvey helped appoint a new headteacher last July, Gareth Rowe, even though he knew he didn’t have the full capabilities for the role.

“Governors asked if the newly appointed headteacher had the experience to deal with the current issues faced by the Discovery School,” read minutes from an NCG meeting in June, attended by Mr Docherty and Mr Payne.

“The Newcastle Sixth-Form College principal explained that he did not but they were confident that he had the ambition and capabilities to undertake the role effectively.”

It added that Mr Docherty was “confident that he would be able to deliver”.

This is a crunch time for the nation’s biggest college group, which is cutting staff and had Ofsted breathing down its neck during a full inspection last month over poor achievement rates.

The watchdog took the highly unusual decision to extend its visit, suggesting not all went well.

Discovery is a specialist science and technology free school.

In a statement, the school said the decision to close had been taken “based on well-documented issues at the school including safeguarding problems, poor teaching and leadership and the results of a recent Ofsted which is expected to deem the school ‘inadequate’”.

Year 11 or 12 students are being offered places at Newcastle Sixth-Form College or Newcastle College – both members of NCG.

A spokesperson for the Department for Education said the school had “let down” pupils, parents and teachers.

Highbury College tumbles two grades from ‘outstanding’

Highbury College has dropped two grades from ‘outstanding’ in an Ofsted report that brands its teaching “uninspiring” and raises concern over low attendance.

The verdict was a serious blow to a heavily criticised leadership team led by Stella Mbubaegbu (pictured above), who maintains that the college has “already embarked on our journey back to ‘outstanding’”.

In addition to her role as principal of the Portsmouth provider, she is also a director of several high-profile FE bodies: Collab Group and the notorious Gazelle Colleges Group.

Ofsted rated the college ‘requires improvement’ overall, in a report that gives grade threes in headline fields including effectiveness of leadership and management, quality of teaching, learning and assessment, 16-to-19 study programmes, and apprenticeships.

It was ‘outstanding’ when Ofsted last inspected in 2011.

“Leaders and governors have been slow to reverse the college’s decline in performance,” the new report warned.

Leaders’ and managers’ “evaluation of the quality of provision, particularly teaching, learning and assessment” is “overoptimistic”, though governors were recognised for having a “good oversight” of most areas of the college.

Inspectors warned that “overall performance has declined and they have not been effective in challenging and supporting senior leaders to stem this decline”.

“Too much teaching is uninspiring and attendance at most lessons is low.”

Too few teachers and assessors “encourage students on study programmes and apprentices to gain the skills and knowledge they need to achieve well”.

The report recognised that the college, which taught almost 7,000 learners last year, was “undergoing a period of some turbulence” at the time of the inspection.

“Leaders were tackling significant financial challenges but had yet to reverse the decline in performance of the past few years,” it said.

The college declined to comment on its current financial position, but according to the 2016/17 ESFA accounts, it had a deficit of £1,663,190.

Ms Mbubaegbu preferred to focus on the more positive elements of the report.

“We are enormously proud of our students and pleased that Ofsted recognises their motivation, work-related skills and their enjoyment of learning,” she said.

“The improvements outlined in the report are well underway and we have already embarked on our journey back to ‘outstanding’. Our focus will remain on enabling all our students to succeed.”

Inspectors did recognise that “students and apprentices are well behaved, confident and respectful, and a strong culture of safety permeates the college”.

Managers “maintain a strong focus on promoting equality of opportunity and creating a culture that welcomes diversity”, resulting in a “respectful and harmonious college community”.

But efforts to improve the quality of teaching “have had limited success”.

Ms Mbubaegbu is listed as a director of Gazelle Colleges Group, which is still active according to Companies House.

The group, registered at Highbury College Portsmouth, was subject to an FE Week investigation in 2014 which revealed how the five founding member colleges had each paid more than £530,000 to the group since it was launched.

But it had drastically scaled down its operations by January last year, when we reported that its membership numbers had fallen from 23 colleges to six.

Despite its problems, the college still describes itself on its website as “a key member” of Gazelle.

Colleges recognised for outstanding higher education provision

Two colleges have received gold medals recognising their outstanding higher education provision in the latest Teaching Excellence Framework ratings.

Sparsholt College and Myerscough College both received the highest possible rating, meaning they deliver “consistently outstanding teaching, learning and outcomes”.

They are among 46 colleges to have received recognition for the quality of their HE provision in this year’s ratings.

“Outstanding teaching, excellent support and progression to further study or employment are the cornerstones

“Outstanding teaching, excellent support and progression to further study or employment are the cornerstones of Sparsholt and these are the criteria we are proud to be judged against,” said Sparsholt principal Tim Jackson (pictured above left).

The Hampshire college offers land-based HE provision accredited by the University of Portsmouth.

The TEF award “demonstrates that the expert teaching teams, outstanding resources and facilities deliver outstanding outcomes for our students,” Mr Jackson added.

Alison Robinson (pictured above right), Myerscough’s principal, said its rating was a “testament to the quality of our talented teaching staff and the excellent programmes we offer”.

The college, in Preston, offers degrees in the land-based and sports sectors, accredited by the University of Central Lancashire.

‘’Our students graduate not only with a qualification that is highly industry relevant, but with the skills they need to forge a successful career in their chosen field,” Ms Robinson said.

David Hughes, the chief executive of the Association of Colleges, said the results “confirm what we already knew, that colleges up and down the country are delivering high-quality higher education which matches the best”.

The TEF awards were introduced by the government to measure the quality of teaching and learning at HE institutes. Fourteen FE colleges have achieved gold status last year.

Institutions can be ranked gold, silver or bronze, based on an independent panel’s assessment of official data, including retention rates, employment outcomes and student satisfaction, along with a detailed statement from the provider.

In addition to the two gold medals, 24 colleges received silver medals and 15 received bronze medals.

A further five received provisional awards, meaning they meet national quality requirements but don’t yet have enough data to be fully assessed.