Profile: Nav Chohan

FE Week meets a principal whose small and perfectly formed college provides a fitting platform from which to launch a big recovery

The miracle college turnaround. The supersized provider. The super-principal. The disruptor who transformed the system. We’re all guilty of fetishising the big and bold stories. You won’t find that here.

Instead, you’ll find a reminder of the value of longevity, of putting down roots and committing to a community. In fact, if there’s a lesson to be learned from Nav Chohan and his principalship of Shipley College, we might as well break all the conventions and get to it from the start. It is that in this age of globalised economy and global pandemic, the little guy has the advantage.

The little guy here is Shipley College, “probably one of the smallest FE colleges in the country”, says its principal. “Quite often when I’m at principals’ parties, they’re quite surprised about how small we are.” Shipley has just 2,725 learners on roll. Chohan, however, has a big personality, just the kind of person you’d trust to liven up a party. His next comment is a humorous dig at his big-college peers: “People often talk about economies of scale, but they don’t talk about ‘diseconomies of scale’, which is on the second page.”

There’s more than a gentle ribbing of other principals here. “Economies of scale is a manufacturing term,” he says. “It doesn’t really apply to the service sector. So at Shipley we stay firm to our roots, and we have an incredible staff. Have you ever been there?”

I won’t call Shipley outstanding because we’re never perfect

In times past I’d be in Saltaire to interview him. Instead, when we speak by video conference, I have to confess that I haven’t. His clear enthusiasm for the place makes me regret it. “It’s just north of Bradford and it’s a World Heritage site. It’s the most beautiful college site in the country probably, an absolutely gorgeous place to be.”

I’m sold. To speak of the zeal of the convert would be an over-statement, but London-born Chohan clearly loves where he finds himself. His career began as a maths teacher in a Nottingham comprehensive 32 years ago. He has since taught computing at West London and Hammersmith College, and before his move to Shipley he gave 12 years to Leeds City College, finishing there as its director of further and higher education.

There are few principals who stay 11 years in one college. (“They usually leave before their mistakes come out,” Chohan quips.) He has been chair of the West Yorkshire Consortium of Colleges (WYCC) and Leeds City Region Skills network (LCRSN) since 2019 – a group whose influence and policy work he typically downplays to focus on their value as colleagues and critical friends (“They’ve let me do the job because I’ve been in post longest.”) Under his leadership, Shipley has been a “rock-solid good” college in Ofsted’s book since 2013.

In didn’t start that way. Just over a year into his tenure, in October 2010, Ofsted downgraded the college to ‘satisfactory’. His statement that “it was a hard thing to get out of” typifies someone who is his own harshest critic. Indeed that Ofsted report mentioned his recent arrival, his already effective agenda for change and the college’s honest self-appraisal. Had Shipley been inspected 18 months earlier, the story may have been of a transformative turnaround with Chohan as its hero in 2013 when the college was once again rated good.

Since then, Shipley has received two further grade 2s from the inspectorate. “I suppose one regret would be that we haven’t got to outstanding. But that might be a reflection of the way we manage the place. I think we’re worth celebrating, but maybe there’s just a little too much humility. I don’t want to call it outstanding because we’re never perfect.”

Principals usually leave before their mistakes come out

Chohan is full of praise for the colleges that have secured the elusive rating, but he isn’t the type to dwell on a judgment by someone else’s standards. Even that early ‘satisfactory’ report, far from a terrible failure, gives a clear indication of his vision for Shipley and his priorities in leadership. It deemed the college “good for employer-responsive provision”, and praised its inclusive curriculum and provision for employers, “strong partnerships with a wide range of groups that lead to benefits for all parties,” and support for vulnerable learners.

Ten years on and a decade of government austerity, economic uncertainty following Brexit and a global pandemic may just show the wisdom of setting those priorities as Shipley College’s foundations. “Having a solid FE college, even in the common difficulties the sector is facing, to be fairly confident about the future, that’s not a bad place to be.”

Like everyone else, Chohan is concerned about the Covid-19 shutdown’s impact on his students’ industry placements. Yet his focus isn’t so much on qualifications, which he has faith can be sorted. His worry is for something greater that his students will have lost: “The most important thing – maybe even more important than the education bit – is having that placement, being in adult situations. It brings them along and develops them so much.”

Placing value on the real experience over the paper evidence evidently runs deep with the Shipley principal. It applies to his assessment of the college as much as to his assessment of his learners’ needs, and it can be traced throughout his career. When he graduated from the University of Bath, he pursued glory as a drummer over a predictable career platform. The rest, as they say, is history.

“I had no talent and this probably wasn’t the direction for me, so towards the end of my year on the dole I got a place on a community programme. That community programme had me working at a city farm in Bristol. I started to teach kids in the local area some basic IT stuff and that’s probably what got me into teaching.”

Later, he took a four-year break from teaching to go in search of industry experience, ostensibly to become a better teacher. It took him back to London, and then to Edinburgh where he worked his way up from systems analyst to project manager for the NHS. A return to teaching was always on the cards, however.

It’s only days later, in a sort of postscript to our interview, that I learn from Chohan that his mother, Bikram, was a junior school teacher. She and his father, Nirmal, were first-generation Sikh immigrants from India who lived and raised him in Greenford, west London, “which has all the hassles of living in London, but none of the glamour”.

They had high aspirations – dad became a civil servant and mum a teacher – and for their son. “There is absolutely no way on Earth I wasn’t going to university. That was presumed from minus nine months.” He took five years to complete his degree in electrical engineering. “My key lesson from university was I wasn’t quite as bright as I thought I was,” he says with a wry smile.

And yet, despite that harsh self-assessment, Chohan occupies a place from which he can affect policy in West Yorkshire and beyond. As I write this piece, chancellor Rishi Sunak is set to announce a “Plan for Jobs” with a major focus on young people, and Chohan’s closing statement of our interview springs to mind: “We do need some kind of solution for people who have unfortunately been made unemployed, and making that happen is going to be a partnership among all the institutions of West Yorkshire, private, and public. Because people deserve that chance.”

With a devolution deal announced for the region just days before lockdown, the influence of local organisations such as the WYCC and LCRSN is only likely to grow, with little Shipley College at its heart.

It’s not a big, brash story, but it does go to show that taking staying lean, flexible and honest can really pay off.

Brighton college receives emergency bailout as chief executive quits

A chief executive has resigned after his college hit serious financial problems that led to a plea for emergency funding and triggered formal FE Commissioner intervention.

Nick Juba (pictured) quit Greater Brighton Metropolitan College (GB Met) “some weeks ago” after five years at the helm.

In an unusual move, Andy Green, who is currently the executive principal at Chichester College Group, will be seconded from August 10 to replace Juba in the interim.

A spokesperson for GB Met said Juba had stepped down for “personal reasons”. But FE Week later discovered that his resignation came in the same month that the college requested a bailout for an undisclosed amount from the Department for Education.

The plea for emergency cash, which has now been granted, led to a notice to improve to be issued in June due to “cash related concerns”, according to the DfE.

The college had received a diagnostic visit from the FE Commissioner in December 2019 following a grade three Ofsted report, but this has now been escalated to formal intervention.

While the college has remained tight-lipped about the cause of its financial problems, their accounts for 2018/19 suggest they could stem from a £21 million redevelopment project for its Pelham Street campus which began in August 2019.

The financial statements state that there “remain some cashflow timing issues to be managed during the project”, which is scheduled to complete in 2021, and their forecasts “show that a short-term borrowing facility will be required”.

The accounts were signed off as a going concern on the basis that a facility could be secured via Barclays, as the bank’s “continuing support has been evidenced over the recent period” after the college breached bank covenants for consecutive years.

FE Week asked the college if a facility has been required from their bank since the accounts were signed off but they did not comment.

A GB Met spokesperson would only say: “We can confirm that the college made a request for emergency funding and was successful in this application.

“This triggered the formal intervention process and we welcome the support of the FE Commissioner and the ESFA and are working closely with them to address the funding issues the college faces.”

Greater Brighton Metropolitan College was formed by the merger of City College Brighton and Northbrook College in 2017. It operates across five campuses in Brighton, Shoreham and Worthing and teaches around 3,500 16 to 18 year olds, 7,500 adult learners, 1,000 undergraduates and 800 apprentices.

Prior to joining the college, Juba was a director of the University of the Arts London. He has also worked at the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, an agency of the Department for Education, as a senior adviser and for the European Commission as consultant and rapporteur.

GB Met said that Juba’s replacement, Andy Green, has a long history with the college having held a number of teaching, director and vice principal roles at what was then City College between 1996 and 2010.

He joined Chichester College as deputy principal in 2010 and was subsequently appointed executive principal and deputy chief executive, during which time he helped lead the college to achieve two consecutive ‘outstanding’ Ofsted inspections.

Commenting on the change in leaders, Sue Berelowitz, chair of GB Met, said: “First of all I want to take this opportunity to thank Nick for his long service and to acknowledge the significant contribution he has made to the college. I wish him well for the future.

“I am also delighted the Andy has agreed to come and join GB MET. He is an outstanding candidate who will bring a wealth of experience and knowledge to the role. His work at Chichester College Group has long been the envy of many other colleges in the country and I am very much looking forward to working with him.”

Revealed: How DfE will fund the school and college leavers scheme and list of eligible courses

The Department for Education has published details of how it will fund the £101 million school and college leavers scheme, as well as a list of 355 eligible courses.

The programme, announced by chancellor Rishi Sunak during his summer statement last week, will give 18 and 19 year olds who are struggling to find work due to Covid-19 the opportunity to study “targeted” level 2 and 3 courses for a third year free of charge.

Here is what you need to know.

 

Funding

The one-year offer will include a £400 “uplift” per learner to cover the costs of putting on additional courses at short notice, recruiting extra students, and preparing staffing and facilities

The DfE said the offer will also include “adjustments to retention payments and job outcome payments to compensate where learners leave early and take up employment or an apprenticeship”.

The funding for 18 year olds will be through 16 to 19 study programme rates but 19 year olds will be funded through the adult education budget.

The department said it will fund 18-year-olds on “larger programmes” at the rate for 16 and 17-year-olds.

The normal funding rate for 16 and 17 year olds, for 2020/21, is £4,188 per student but this drops to £3,455 for 18 year olds.

The DfE said the Education and Skills Funding Agency will administer the additional funding via 16 to 19 funding and the adult education budget to support delivery from September 1, 2020.

Further information about funding for both age groups is expected to be published before the end of this month.

 

Payments for 18-year-olds

The DfE said they will determine the number of additional students from a provider’s “R04 data return” and the autumn census compared to delivery in the previous year and make a “programme payment in-year (subject to affordability)”.

“We will amend 2020 to 2021 allocations accordingly and reprofile across the rest of the year.”

As these students will be recorded as “lagged” student numbers, the programme funding element paid in-year will be “offset against future funding”.

The £400 uplift will not be offset. The 16 to 19 year-old bursary fund allocations will be “adjusted where appropriate to reflect the extra 18-year-olds”.

The DfE added that they will retain some funding for enrolments “later in the year”.

“Providers will receive the uplift for students enrolled after November 2020 in the 2021 to 2022 academic year, and the programme funding in the 2022 to 2023 academic year. The intention is to maximise in-year payments based on the available budget.”

 

Payments for 19-year-olds

The DfE said they will allocate the “additional ESFA AEB before the end of August 2020” to providers.

“We will distribute funding using a consistent calculation taking into account delivery in 2018 to 2019, historic delivery of the qualifications in scope, affordability and track record requirements in the published performance management rules.

“The additional funding will be ringfenced within your ESFA AEB and be performance managed separately.”

The department added that learners will be fully funded to undertake a qualification from the agreed list (see below) including those who already hold a level 2 and level 3 qualification.

For those wishing to undertake a subsequent level 3 this means they will not be required to take out an advanced learner loan.

 

List of eligible qualifications

The DfE confirmed the one-year offer will enable 18 and 19-year-olds leaving education and training who are unable to find employment or work-based training, opportunities to be fully funded to undertake specific level 2 and level 3 qualifications that have been identified as “relevant to higher wage returns and economic growth opportunities”.

There are 355 courses in total, 155 of which are at level 2 and 200 at level 3. They are a range of A-levels and vocational and technical qualifications including applied generals such as BTECs.

Subject areas include building and construction, engineering, health and social care, ICT practitioners, manufacturing technologies, maths and statistics, medicine and dentistry, nursing, science and transportation.

The DfE said providers will need to “demonstrate how courses through this offer support employment outcomes, and evidence of need for skills in their local area”.

Download the full list here.

How to assess learners’ starting points and personalise curriculum plans

Ofsted’s new Education Inspection Framework (EIF) has changed the way learning is delivered, with increased scrutiny on the ability to conduct and evidence learners’ starting point assessments.

Providers now need to have clear methods that identify learners’ prior knowledge, skills, and career goals – before they start their course.

Naturally, you should use this insight to then create more personalised curriculum plans for learners’ courses and ensure a ‘high quality of education’.

In fact, the new EIF requires providers to:

Assess a learner’s:

  • Prior knowledge and attainment
  • Current strengths and capabilities
  • Personal ambitions, career goals and/or next academic steps
  • Understanding of the subject area (key themes and gaps in knowledge).

Use the outcomes of this assessment to develop a personalised curriculum plan for the learner’s course:

  • Ensuring learners spend more time on topics which will add the greatest value
  • Introducing ‘stretch and challenge’ where learners have strong prior knowledge
  • Using this insight to make sure advice, guidance and feedback from tutors and learning support is individualised to maximise progression.

Some current practices will pose a risk if providers do not change their approach.  

“Providers need to know about the progress that learners are making from their defined and recorded starting points. This approach is critical to demonstrate aspirations for high levels of achievement and leads to increased knowledge retention, because the curriculum is better targeted to what learners need to know” – Chris Jones, former Ofsted HMI and Specialist Advisor for Further Education and Skills.

But for providers with high numbers of learners, completing these initial starting point assessments and tailoring plans can be quite a complex task.

 

 

Current issues providers face

Currently, most providers approach this task by conducting manual assessments, then using qualified staff to create an individualised curriculum plan for each learner.

This can be a time-consuming, costly, and risky tactic, as it leaves a potential gap for a lack of consistency in how different staff may create different types of plans for learners.

Plus, if you have a high number of learners, you might not have the capacity to conduct this process and maintain quality assurance for all learners.

 

 

Introducing TSN’s ‘Online Diagnostic and Curriculum Planning Tool’

With this in mind, many providers are now looking for better ways to assess learners’ starting points and create more personalised curriculum plans for their courses.

The Skills Network (TSN) can help transform the way you approach this.

TSN has just launched a new online tool to analyse learners’ starting points, auto-personalise curriculum plans using artificial intelligence, and maximise overall development and progression opportunities.

The brand new “Online Diagnostic and Curriculum Planning Tool” enables you to:

  • Use online questions to capture data on each learner’s prior learning, strengths, knowledge gaps, and career goals before they start their course
  • Auto-create personalised curriculum plans for your learners including:
    • Highlighting sections of the course that learners need to dedicate more time to
    • Suggesting ‘stretch and challenge’ activities where high prior knowledge is present
    • Providing suggestions of new personalised learning content (including relevant work-based scenarios)
    • Creating individualised SMART developmental targets for your learners
    • Providing data for tutors and support staff so they can provide tailored support
    • Structuring learners’ study time more productively based on their prior knowledge.

With clearly defined starting points, you can use to the tool to better target learners’ course curriculum towards higher levels of individual progression and achievement.

 

Find out more

We’d love to have a conversation with you and discuss how this new online tool can benefit your delivery.

To find out more information, please click here.

“This technology is a game changer. It enables you to quickly identify the knowledge, skills, and behaviours that learners bring with them as they start a new programme of learning. It will help providers to set out a carefully structured and targeted curriculum plan. This should allow any provider to have the data and information they need to describe and evidence the intent, implementation, and impact of their curriculum.” – Chris Jones, former Ofsted HMI and Specialist Advisor for Further Education and Skills

 

 

 

Ofsted confirms shake-up of redress system – but will give providers longer to complain

Ofsted has confirmed it will proceed with a shake-up of the redress system for inspections, but will give providers five working days to complain, rather than two.

The watchdog has published the outcome to its consultation on changes to complaints, which was launched in March.

The consultation proposed that formal complaints raised by education providers within two working days of receiving their final report would effectively delay publication of the report until the complaint is dealt with.

Under the current system, providers have to submit formal complaints within 10 days of an issue of concern, and Ofsted does not normally withhold publication of reports while it considers complaints.

But Ofsted proposed changes after admitting the current approach has led to it having to take action after it has published a report “when a complaint investigation highlights an error in the inspection process”.

However, in its response to the consultation, Ofsted said it had “taken on board comments stating that two working days is not sufficient time to submit a formal complaint”, and said it “decided to extend the period for providers to submit a complaint to five working days from when we issue them with the final report”.

The plan for Ofsted to consider and respond to formal complaints from inspected providers before it publishes their inspection report will be taken forward, as will a proposal to give providers five working days to review their draft report and submit concerns about issues of “factual accuracy and the inspection process”. At the moment, they only receive one.

The current system of internal reviews, which are the last step for those not satisfied with the way their complaint has been handled, will be retained, as proposed in the consultation.

Ofsted said the responses to its consultation had been “very positive”. Of the further education and skills providers that responded, 89 per cent agreed with the proposal to give them five working days to review draft reports for accuracy, and 83 per cent agreed with the proposal to delay the publication of reports until after complaints are resolved.

Sixty one per cent agreed with the proposal to retain current internal review system.

Ofsted said retaining the current system “will continue to provide important challenge, independence, transparency and an insight into our complaints-handling process”.

DfE tender reveals plans to design ‘new training model’ for adults

The national retraining scheme has taken another step forward after the government began searching for “partnerships” to design and test 12 week courses for adults that lead to “guaranteed” job interviews.

A Department for Education tender has gone out for groups of employers, providers and local authorities to deliver “a new training model” initially in the digital sector where there is a skills shortage.

Three contracts are up for grabs, one in each local enterprise partnership area of Leeds City Region, Heart of the South West and D2N2 (Derby, Derbyshire, Nottingham and Nottinghamshire).

The “model” is expected to deliver training that “meets employer’s immediate needs in a pre-employment phase, de-risking the recruitment process for them”.

Participants must be adults aged 19 or older who are in work or recently unemployed. The DfE “anticipates” that at least 75 per cent of all trainees will move into a new job or role.

The department confirmed to FE Week that this programme of work is part of their national retraining scheme, which was first promised in June 2017 as a manifesto commitment and has been backed with an initial £100 million by the Treasury.

The first phase of the scheme was rolled out in select areas in July last year with the launch of a new digital service – Get Help to Retrain – that acts as a course and job directory.

Asked about this new tender, the DfE said: “These initiatives build on the extensive user-research and engagement with local areas through the national retraining scheme.

“Building on what we have learnt, we are exploring the effectiveness of employer-led, flexible training initiatives.”

They added that this could also help to inform how the upcoming £2.5 billion national skills fund might work.

The DfE continued: “We are currently talking to a number of local areas, employers and providers to better understand how these initiatives can successfully support local regions and employers to fill skills shortages, by bringing participating individuals closer to better jobs through guaranteed interviews.

“This notice is one way of engaging with potential partners so that it can feed in to the wider development of these initiatives.”

The tender states that the department will “aim to award up to three contracts (one per area) to partner organisations consisting of local employers, digital/ICT training providers, local authorities and the FE sector to evidence digital skills shortage vacancies and design and deliver approximately 12 week training courses to provide a pipeline of individuals to fill those roles (when possible we will expand to include other technical skills)”.

Bids “must” detail the “cash and/or in-kind contribution that employers will make, examples could include work experience or support with CVs, interview skills and other interpersonal skills – we are interested in ideas around this”.

A “successful” bid will show, for example, how employers are represented and leading on what training is delivered; how guaranteed interviews are secured as an outcome; how underrepresented groups and those with “protected characteristics” will be engaged and recruited to the training programmes.

Applications must also show how proposed costs of training are determined, including how costs could be reduced through scaling up, whilst “maintaining quality”; and how training will be delivered “flexibly” around other commitments including work, job seeking and caring.

The funding available to each area will “depend on proposals from bidders”, and it will be calculated on “how many people they would train to meet the demand they have identified”.

Bids are open until August 31. The DfE expects delivery to get underway by January 2021. The tender can be viewed here.

Ney report finds depleted ESFA missing early warning signs of college financial failure

Staff cuts to the Education and Skills Funding Agency have been a key factor in their failure to spot early signs of college weaknesses, the long-awaited independent report into oversight of college finances has found.

Dame Mary Ney was commissioned by former skills minister Anne Milton in August 2019 to conduct a review after the shock collapse of the Hadlow College Group revealed failings by the funding body to spot warning signs.

The overarching recommendation from her review, published this morning but dated October 2019, is that there needs to be a “new strategic relationship with the sector”.

It states that the nature of the current intervention regime, the “lack of a sector-wide strategy” and the capacity and resources of the ESFA have resulted in a relationship between government and the sector which is “largely focused on financial failure and which inhibits colleges being transparent with government”.

The relationship is “largely contractual”, focused on the funding agreements and therefore government “does not have sufficient line of sight on the wider issues colleges face and early warning signs of difficulty”.

As a consequence, the sector “lacks confidence in seeking support and advice at an early stage”, Ney warns.

She appears to be recommending the return of funding body relationship managers that would frequently meet with all college leaders, which were a feature of the previous Learning and Skills Council.

The report states that whilst each college currently has a named liaison worker from the ESFA Territorial Teams, “in practice capacity only allows this to be a desk-based oversight of college data which in the main relates to financial returns” and this only becomes a more active role for colleges which are on the intervention pathway.

“This means that in the main the ESFA Territorial Teams do not have a relationship with colleges which gives them any regular granularity of understanding of such matters as vision and ambition, leadership strengths and weaknesses, resource planning, governance compliance etc,” Ney said.

“Importantly it does not give them a line of sight to early signs of potential weaknesses nor allow the government to hold colleges to account for compliance with its guidance and expectations.”

Ney said that for colleges not in intervention, the extent of compliance with the governance and financial planning guides is “largely unknown”.

“Generally, there is no line of sight of the functioning of boards and audit committees; there is not an in depth assessment of the quality of management accounts and financial planning; there is no scrutiny of governance or counter fraud policies; and there is no discussion around curriculum planning, trading/commercial activity, estate management, risk management, partnership working and whether the college is supporting the needs of local employers or the economy,” she added.

But Ney acknowledges that there has been a 60 per cent reduction in ESFA capacity for this work which has led to “prioritisation of resources to focus on the most problematic cases”.

As revealed by FE Week in January, the then Skills Funding Agency shed over 1,000 staff when responsible for college financial oversight, before being brought into the Department for Education (DfE) in 2017.

Ney said the development of a “more proactive relationship with all colleges individually would give oversight of all of these issues and allow a stronger culture of prevention to be developed”.

“It would give colleges the confidence to seek timely advice and help, leading to fewer colleges in intervention and fewer demands for financial support.”

This “new relationship” could incorporate “annual conversations, looking holistically at the college as a critical friend but also allowing the college to showcase their achievements and raise their concerns”.

It would require ESFA staff to become “active participants in nurturing college development”.

Ney also appears to be in favour of giving government greater control. Her report states that the power to be “more decisive could lead to shorter periods in intervention for colleges in difficulty who need a structural solution”.

“A new regulatory regime would require an appetite for radical legislative change and therefore is a matter for more long term consideration,” she added.

The review also recommends that those involved in financial oversight contribute to the Ofsted judgement on leadership to “provide an holistic view and avoid disconnect between the judgements of the two bodies”.

Apprenticeship assessment ‘flexibilities’ to stay until at least January

Special measures that have led to more than 100 apprenticeship standards gaining permission to carry out end-point assessments remotely during the Covid-19 pandemic will be retained into the new year.

The Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education’s chief executive Jennifer Coupland announced today that the flexibilities will continue until at least the start of 2021.

Apprenticeship assessments usually involve an element of face-to-face assessment, which was not possible due to movement and social distancing restrictions during lockdown.

The flexibilities introduced vary for each standard but can include using technology to conduct observations or professional discussions remotely and reordering assessment methods so that written tests or professional discussions can be taken now and the observation delivered later.

Coupland said: “It is fantastic that the assessment flexibilities, which we carefully tailored for different sectors with employer groups, have helped thousands of apprentices to complete in spite of Covid-19.

“We want this to continue as people gradually return to work-places and face-to-face learning and assessment becomes more viable. The institute will start looking from September at where to go next with the flexibilities, but I can confirm we are not planning to make any changes before the new year to give everyone a degree of stability.”

Prime minister Boris Johnson has now advised that people should start returning to work where possible, which sparked enquiries as to whether the institute will continue to support remote assessment and other flexibilities around the delivery of EPA, according to an IfATE spokesperson.

Coupland said: “The EPA flexibilities have played a vital role in supporting the completion of many apprenticeships through these challenging and unprecedented times. We want to clarify now that there are no imminent plans to reverse these.”

The IfATE spokesperson added that they will give 12 weeks notice from when any changes are announced to existing flexibilities before EPA organisations will have to deliver them.

Labour: Ney report exposes ministerial unawareness of financial crisis ‘engulfing’ colleges

Dame Mary Ney’s report into college financial oversight exposes a “decade of austerity” and a lack of ministerial awareness of the financial crisis “engulfing” the FE sector, Labour’s shadow apprenticeships minister has said.

Toby Perkins added that the failure in oversight has been “exacerbated by the Tory cuts to the civil service”.

He was responding to the long-awaited independent Ney report, which was completed in October 2019 but only published by the Department for Education today.

The review was commissioned after Hadlow and West Kent and Ashford Colleges became the first colleges to be placed in education administration last year – a shock collapse that revealed failings by the funding body to spot warning signs.

Ney’s overarching recommendation was that there needs to be a shift to a new nurturing and “strategic” relationship with the sector. She warned that significant staff cuts to the Education and Skills Funding Agency have been a key factor in their inability to find early signs of weakness (full story here).

Perkins said: “Dame Ney should be thanked for an excellent report which demands government action to address a widespread failure that is allowing our FE sector to drift towards bankruptcy.

“The report exposes in detail the appalling consequences of a decade of austerity, the failure of the government’s FE reforms and the lack of ministerial awareness of the financial crisis engulfing our crucial FE sector.

“The failure in oversight has been exacerbated by the Tory cuts to the civil service and reforms that have weakened the oversight that government provides.”

The shadow minister added that Ney is “correct” that the current mechanisms and reforms are “inadequate to address this failing and for all the government’s rhetoric about the importance of the sector the truth is that colleges are collapsing and young people are being let down by these failings.

“Labour hopes that the Secretary of state will be making a statement to parliament to confirm that he will address the failings identified and confirm if he will adopt the recommendations in full very soon.”

James Kewin, deputy chief executive of the Sixth Form Colleges Association, said that Ney’s report makes some welcome recommendations, such as three year funding settlements, a “more joined up approach” to intervention, and strengthened governance.

However, the “scope of the review did not allow Dame Mary to focus on what actually causes financial instability in the first place – not least the decade of underinvestment in post-16 education,” he added.

“Reconfiguring the departments and agencies involved in intervention or refining the financial information provided by colleges will, in isolation, have a limited impact.

“There is certainly a need to reform financial oversight, but there is a more pressing need to ask if colleges are receiving the funding required to provide students with a high quality education”.

Deputy chief executive of the Association of Colleges, Julian Gravatt, said: “It’s helpful that DfE have finally published Dame Mary Ney’s review on the financial oversight of colleges. She concluded her work in autumn 2019 at a time when many colleges were on an improving trajectory but she describes a system which is complex, backward-looking and not really focused on the key tasks.

“The Covid-19 crisis has stopped the financial improvement in its tracks, caused deficits in 2019-20 and opened up large financial problems for colleges in 2020-21.

“Government and colleges should take her recommendations seriously and work out which of them still make sense nine months on. We do not agree with the suggestion that Ofsted should join the long line of regulators assessing college financial health but we do think that the existing arrangements require improvement.”

You can read the government’s response to the Ney report here.