Chair at inadequate-rated Stockport College tells board he is stepping down

The chair of governors at Stockport College, which was hit with an inadequate Ofsted rating last year before being placed in administered status by the FE Commissioner, is to step down amid concerns for the future of 150 jobs.

Trevor Rees (pictured) told fellow college corporation board members on Thursday (July 10) that he would be stepping down after eight years as chair as soon as his replacement was found.

Mr Rees was reported on the Manchester Evening News website today as saying: “It has been a privilege and an honour to have served on the board. I’m sure the college will go from strength to strength moving forward.”

It comes less than a year after Ofsted’s visit and follows three underwhelming monitoring reports by the education watchdog.

Former principal Stephen Carlisle was replaced by interim Ian Clinton in February, but since then it has emerged that the 690-worker college, which had already shed 235 jobs in the past three years, was set to cut another 150 jobs after FE Commissioner Dr David Collins recommended it shave £2.5m off staff costs.

One of the first tasks of the new chair will be to find the full-time replacement for Mr Clinton, who said: “I’m grateful to Mr Rees for his support, guidance and commitment to Stockport College. As well as the numerous meetings that Mr Rees attended, he also took particular interest in staff and student welfare issues.”

Ian Clinton
Ian Clinton

Chartered accountant Mr Rees led a board that had gone from 11 to 15 members since the Ofsted inspection result, which had previously been outstanding.

A college spokesperson said: “Mr Rees informed the board that, having overseen the initial transformation of the college arising from the recommendations of Ofsted and the FE Commissioner through the appointment of an interim principal and the refreshing of the governing body by the appointment of new governors, he felt it was right that the continued improvement of the college should be led by a new chair.

“The board of the corporation will now commence the process for the appointment of a new chair which it hoped could be made as soon as possible.”

In its most recent Ofsted monitoring visit report, the 9,000-learner college was deemed to have made insufficient progress in creating and implementing a post-inspection action plan, improving maths and English, and in performance management by senior leaders.

It was, however, was judged to have made reasonable progress on teaching and learning, and curriculum change planning.

With the job cuts, which will mostly affect non-management positions including lecturers, and other measures, the college could, according to Dr Collins, achieve a surplus of £185,000 in 2014/15 by hitting a £25m turnover target.

Speaking in March, Mr Clinton said: “By focusing the college’s activities towards the skills needs of Greater Manchester employers, we will be better-able to enhance the job prospects of our learners.

“Sadly, as a consequence, some redundancies are unavoidable. We hope to be able to mitigate the scale of any redundancies by redeploying staff into vacant posts in our growth areas.”

Sector welcomes new Skills Minister and Education Secretary as Cabinet-bound Matthew Hancock issues farewell message

The FE sector has been quick to have its say on today’s appointments of Nick Boles to Skills Minister and Nicky Morgan to Education Secretary.

Former Skills Minister Matthew Hancock has been appointed as Business, Enterprise and Energy Minister and will attend Cabinet in his job (although not as a Cabinet post-holder), which is a new shared role at the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) and the Department for Energy and Climate Change.

Hancocktweet

He tweeted his goodbye to the sector this afternoon. He said: “It has been a huge pleasure to serve as Skills Minister. So many brilliant people. With Nick Boles, skills are in safe hands.”

The announcement that Greg Clark will take on the Universities and Science brief, replacing David Willetts, has also been welcomed.

 

Dr Mary Bousted

General secretary of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers (ATL)Maryheadshot

“David Cameron has, belatedly, realised that Michael Gove’s ideological drive is no substitute for measured, pragmatic reform of the education system. Time after time he has chased newspaper headlines rather than engage with teachers.

“The dismantling of the structures which support schools, the antagonism which he displayed to the teaching profession and the increasing evidence of chaos in the bodies he established – in particular the Education Funding Agency — has led Cameron to one conclusion — Gove is more of a liability than an asset.

“Successful education systems value the views of the teaching profession, which Gove insulted when he called them ‘the blob’. ATL looks forward to a more constructive relationship with his successor, Nicky Morgan.”

 

Martin Doel

Chief executive of the Association of Colleges (AoC)

Martin Doel
Martin Doel

“We welcome the appointment of Nicky Morgan to the post of Education Secretary. I know from meeting her over the last few years that she understands the significant contribution colleges make in educating over 800,000 16 to 18-year-olds.

“One of her most urgent tasks will be to ensure that the education of this age group does not suffer further funding cuts, an issue I discussed with Michael Gove earlier this month. I look forward to talking to the new Secretary of State about this and about curriculum and qualification reform.

“Michael Gove has made significant changes in his time in office — many of which we have welcomed, including removing the funding gap between 16 to 18-year-olds studying in schools and colleges, introducing free meals for college students and his acceptance of the Wolf Report. We have had our disagreements of course, especially the early decision to abolish Education Maintenance Allowances, but we wish him well in his new post.

“We also welcome the appointment of Nick Boles as Minister of State in both the Department for Education (DfE) and BIS. He has some significant challenges ahead of him including making a key decision about the future funding for 16 to 18-year-olds and the proposed reform of apprenticeships. I very much look forward to working with him.

“Greg Clark, the new Minister for Universities and Science, will be receiving a copy of our new report, Breaking the Mould: Creating higher education fit for the future,  about the need to ensure colleges delivering higher education are funded in the same way as universities and granted the autonomy to choose how they spend it. Doing so would allow students to access more technical and vocational education and help close the skills gap.

“I’d like to pay tribute to both Matthew Hancock and David Willetts for the work they have done to support colleges during their tenures.”

 

Sally Hunt

General secretary of the University and College Union

Sally Hunt
Sally Hunt

“We wish Nick Boles and Greg Clark well in their new roles.

“The further and higher education sectors have enormous significance for both our economy and our society.

“Public spending cuts have had a profound impact on post-16 education and all parties now need to set out their stall for further and higher education.

“The introduction of new ministers is an opportunity for government to refocus its education priorities in the run up to the election.”

 

 

Dr Lynne Sedgmore

Executive director of the 157 Group

Lynne Sedgmore
Lynne Sedgmore

“We look forward to working closely with Nick Boles and to introducing him to the excellent work done by FE colleges as he takes up his new role.

“Having an open and productive relationship with the government helps ensure that policy-making in FE is informed by those with the experience and expertise to make a positive difference.

“At a time of great change in our country and in our sector, it is vital that colleges are supported to provide young people and adults with the skills that employers want and the economy needs.

“We congratulate Matthew Hancock on his appointment, and wish him well in his new role as Business, Enterprise and Energy Minister. The 157 Group has enjoyed a strong and fruitful relationship with him over the past two years, and we thank him for his commitment and his focus on FE colleges.”

 

Stewart Segal

Chief executive of the Association of Employment and Learning Providers (AELP)

Stewart Segal
Stewart Segal

“AELP is pleased that the Prime Minister has retained the joint BIS/DfE portfolio for skills and vocational education and we welcome Nick Boles to his new post.

“We look forward to engaging with him on how to grow the new traineeships programme and on formulating a set of apprenticeship reforms that work for businesses of all sizes, especially as there is increasing evidence that not all business supports the government proposals.

“We should build on what works and on the evidence base that has developed since the Richard recommendations were first published. We wish Matthew Hancock all the best in his wider portfolio and appreciate his protection of apprenticeships as the flagship skills programme when other programme budgets were under pressure.

“We also congratulate Nicky Morgan on her promotion to Education Secretary and hope that she will champion vocational learning and impartial careers advice for young people.”

 

Tom Stannard

Deputy chief executive of the National Institute for Adult Continuing Education (Niace)

Tom Stannard“We welcome Nick Boles to his new role and look forward to working with him on the skills and lifelong learning agenda at a critical time for the economy and society. We must ensure we have a skills system fit for the 21st Century which will lead to prosperity for all.

“We are pleased that he will retain briefs in both BIS and DfE. This will lead to closer working relationships between the two departments, something we have called for in our manifesto.

“Matthew Hancock will be a tough act to follow and we would like to congratulate him on his promotion. We are pleased that he’s staying within BIS.

“We also look forward to working with Greg Clark as the new Minister for Universities and Science. His experience of working on local growth will be vital in his new role, especially with the regional skills agenda.

“We also welcome Nicky Morgan to her new role as Education Secretary. Family learning is high on our agenda and we are pleased that DfE has shown an interest in supporting our National Family Learning Forum. We are also keen to continue our close working relationship with the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) , not least on the Mid-life Career Review.

“We hope today’s reshuffle will lead to government departments — particularly BIS, DfE and DWP — working closer together. As we have stated in our manifesto, people having access to the learning they both want and need is crucial for the future well-being of our economy and society. This includes a range of training opportunities at work to meet skills gaps and skills shortages, families learning together to raise children’s attainment at school and people out of work having secure pathways to sustainable and fulfilling careers.”

New Skills Minister Nick Boles admits to knowing ‘nothing’ about sector

New Skills Minister Nick Boles admitted to knowing “nothing” about the sector during his first parliamentary appearance in the job, but said he was “keen to learn” about FE and skills.

Likening himself to dim-witted Faulty Towers  waiter Manuel (pictured right), played by Andrew Sachs in the 1970s BBC comedy series, Mr Boles told a Westminster Hall debate he felt unprepared.Manuel - Faulty Towers

Responding to statements from MPs Graham Allen, Andrew Percy and Justin Tomlinson, along with Shadow Education Minister Rushanara Ali, about provision for 14 to 17-year-olds considered pre-Neet (not in education, employment or training) and Ofsted, he spoke of his pride in taking on the new role.

He said: “I am tremendously privileged and lucky and happy to be given this job. Like poor Manuel, I know nothing at the moment, but I am keen to learn.”

He said a piece of jargon he was not fond of was the phrase “workreadiness,” as he conceded he felt “quite un-workready myself” after less than 24 hours in the job.

Mr Boles also used his speech to pay tribute to the “energy, enthusiasm and drive” of his predecessor, Matthew Hancock, who has been appointed Business, Enterprise and Energy Minister and will attend Cabinet in his job (although not as a Cabinet post-holder).

For more on Mr Boles’s first parliamentary appearance as Skills Minister see feweek.co.uk this afternoon

Nicky Morgan replaces Gove at DfE as Cameron promotes women to top jobs

Loughborough MP Nicky Morgan, who has served in two Treasury positions, is the new Education Secretary following the departure of Michael Gove.

Ms Morgan, aged 41, moved into Mr Gove’s job at the Department for Education (DfE) after his move to the office of Chief Whip in the House of Commons.

London-born Ms Morgan, a mum-of-one, was one of several highly-regarded Conservative women tipped for promotion, including former Education Minister Elizabeth Truss, who will be the new Environment Secretary following Owen Paterson’s departure.

An Oxford graduate and former solicitor, Ms Morgan was elected in 2010 having lost to Labour’s Andy Reed in 2005.

Within weeks of entering the House of Commons she was appointed a Conservative member of the Business, Innovation and Skills Select Committee, serving four months until she was given the post of Parliamentary Private Secretary to Universities Minister David Willetts.

She was promoted to Economic Secretary at the Treasury in October, and then to Financial Secretary in April following Sajid Javid’s appointment as Culture Secretary. She retains her brief for women and equalities.

Her Twitter handle is @NickyMorgan01.

Nick Boles is new Skills Minister after move to joint role at BIS and DfE

Former Planning Minister Nick Boles has taken on a joint role at the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) and the Department for Education (DfE).

Although it has not been officially confirmed the 48-year-old Tory, a former flatmate of Michael Gove, will take on the skills portfolio, a Downing Street spokesperson told FE Week that he “understood” he would be taking Matthew Hancock’s old role.

A Winchester College student and Oxford graduate, Mr Boles owned and small business and served on Westminster City Council before entering Parliament in 2010 for the Grantham and Stamford constituency. He was a founder and director of the Policy Exchange thinktank.

He was previously an undersecretary of state at the Department for Communities and Local Government, where he was in charge of planning policy.

His Twitter handle is @NickBolesMP.

UPDATE (11.47am): Mr Boles’s Parliamentary office has confirmed to FE Week that he has taken on the skills brief.

UPDATE (12.33am): Mr Boles has given his first comments as Skills Minister to FE Week after reporter Freddie Whittaker caught up with him as he made his way to the BIS offices in London for his first briefing.

He said: “I am absolutely delighted with the appointment. It’s a really crucial role. If we are going to make sure everyone can benefit from the economic recovery we have to make sure they have got the skills they need.”

Hancock to attend Cabinet in new business role as Cameron shakes up top team

Matthew Hancock has moved to a new shared role at the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills and Department for Energy and Climate Change.

The MP for West Suffolk and former Skills and Enterprise Minister has been appointed as Business, Enterprise and Energy Minister, taking on the work of former Business Minister Michael Fallon, who is the new Defence Secretary.

Mr Hancock will keep the ‘enterprise’ elements of his former brief. He will also be Minister for Portsmouth, a job previously held by Mr Fallon.

In the shake-up, in which Foreign Secretary William Hague resigned and Education Secretary Michael Gove went to Chief Whip, Mr Hancock got what he had been expecting for weeks — a seat at Cabinet (although he will not hold a Cabinet post). The new Education Secretary is Nicky Morgan, who had recently been promoted to a ministerial role in the Treasury.

Elected as MP for West Suffolk in 2010, Mr Hancock became Skills Minister in 2012.

In an interview with FE Week at the time, he said FE was “something I’ve cared about for a long time” and said he would be “learning and I’m listening and I’m asking lots of questions”.

He added: “I’ve trying to make sure that I know exactly how the system works and figure out how it can work better.”

He hit the ground running with plans to set up the organisation that would become the Education and Training Foundation — then known as the FE Guild — originally proposed by his predecessor John Hayes, which replaced the Learning and Skills Improvement Service (LSIS).

A month later, the Richard Review of Apprenticeships was published, a report that would impact on many of Mr Hancock’s policy decisions in office, sparking an ongoing reform of apprenticeship funding.

Apprenticeships are now set to move from being funded through direct government payment to providers, to employers paying for training in return for greater control of the programme — as recommended by review author Doug Richard, a former investor on the BBC’s Dragons’ Den show.

However, several bodies within the FE and skills sector have expressed concern that such reforms may make apprenticeships too complicated and bureaucratic for smaller employers.

A technical consultation on the reforms, which closed in May, proposed three options — maintaining the current system, bringing in a PAYE system or implementing apprenticeship credit accounts for employers.

The government response to the consultation has not been released.

Mr Hancock said: “We want to see apprenticeships become the new norm for all ambitious young people, and for employers who are dedicated to growing their own talent and increasing the skills base of the nation.”

The reforms, he added, were “helping to make this a reality”.

The Wolf Report, published a year before Hancock took on the role of Skills Minister, also led to upheaval in the sector, with many vocational qualifications being cut after being deemed “low value”.

“We support vocational qualifications that help people into work, so we must focus support on those that employers value,” said Mr Hancock.

However, the move has not been without controversy, as organisations such as the National Institute of Adult Continuing Education have warned that although some courses may not lead directly to jobs, they can help to entice adult learners back into education, and inspire them to improve their qualifications.

In January 2013, Mr Hancock announced his flagship programme for young people without the skills or experience to get an apprenticeship — the traineeship, which combines maths, English and employability training with a work experience placement.

The program was launched officially in August 2013 and despite initial problems with recruitment, awareness and benefits rules which prevent trainees from claiming Job Seeker’s Allowance, numbers are increasing.

When FE Week spoke with him last year after 12 months in post, he mentioned traineeships as one of the highlights in office.

“They [traineeships] started out as an idea in October, when the work started in earnest, and the high point of the year was meeting a pilot group of trainees at the House of Commons,” he said.

The other project Mr Hancock can lay claim to is the Further Education Learning Technology Action Group (Feltag), which he set up with sector and industry experts to find out how FE could make better use of technology.

The group, which published its report in March, has called for sweeping changes to the use of technology in teaching and learning and has spawned a similar group to examine the issue for under-16 education.

When the report was released, Mr Hancock said: “I think we can harness technology to drive up standards. It’s about empowering teachers and using technology to improve and strengthen teaching.”

While the response to Feltag and traineeships have been largely positive, many in the sector have spoken out against the government’s decision to cut the full-time funding rate for 18-year-olds by 17.5 per cent, warning it would damage the chances of people who had been failed by the education system already.

However, Mr Hancock defended the move, saying: “We are faced with a cut across the government to make savings to reach the goals we have to reduce budget deficit. It is difficult being a minister when there’s no money left.”

Such difficulties didn’t stop him from receiving a promotion in September 2013 to Minister of State for Skills and Enterprise (having previously been Skills Minister as Under Secretary of State).

In January 2014 he announced the first new college to open in 21 years since incorporation.

Mr Hancock said a specialist college to train engineers to build and maintain the proposed High Speed 2 rail link would be founded, and just week later this was followed by a second, this time focussed on the skills needed for the nuclear power industry.

He said: “The new college will build on the industry’s work — and provide the specialist, advanced skills to meet that demand — and then sell that expertise to the world.”

Essex-based charity Prospects Learning Foundation was later revealed to be the college in question. It was not the HS2 college predicted, but a new rail college elsewhere to serve the transport project remains on the cards.

As well as new colleges, a range of new technical and vocational qualifications have been announced during Mr Hancock’s time in office, including the TechBacc a measurement requiring maths, an extended writing project and vocational qualifications.

The Tech Level, a vocational qualification that can be done instead of or alongside academic A levels and substantial vocational qualification to help 16 to 19-year-olds with basic skills needs to go straight into a skilled trade or move onto a related Tech-Level, have also been introduced.

When Mr Hancock first took the job as Skills Minister, he told FE Week he was looking forward to finding out “what we can do to make this sector even more successful” and raise its profile.

A number of national newspapers have tipped him for Conservative Party leadership, and even painted him as possible Prime Minister in the future.

Mr Hancock himself has been tight-lipped about his own hopes for the future, but given that he once appeared to compare himself to Winston Churchill in an interview with The Spectator, it’s seems safe to say he has ambitions.

When asked about the future during a profile interview with FE Week in April, he replied: “Politics is a team game, so you play the part in the team that you are asked to play.”

Click here to read the full FE Week profile interview with Mr Hancock.

Gazelle ‘front-runner’ for ETF’s £1m learning tech contract

The Gazelle Foundation has been awarded a £1m learning technology contract from the Education and Training Foundation (ETF) amid concerns about a lack of evidence surrounding its effectiveness. David Russell acknowledges such scepticism as he defends the award.

The ETF has announced the latest of our contract awards and the biggest among them was a £1m contract to support the education and training sector in realising the potential of learning technology.

This is a vital agenda, and a role I am delighted that we have been asked by Government to take on following its recent response to the Further Education Learning Technology Action Group (Feltag) report.

But first let me address one possible concern head on.

I read the papers. I know there is scepticism in some quarters about Gazelle, who will lead the consortium on this delivery work for us.

I understand some teachers and lecturers have asked pointed questions about whether Gazelle delivers on its promises, and about whether it always acts in the interests of learners.

It is right to ask questions, to scrutinise, and to expect evidence of impact. I expect that too.

Whatever we may say about the autonomy of institutions in our sector, it is public money which pays for most of our activity, the ETF and providers alike. Public money must deliver public value; this is a non-negotiable for me.

We had four bids for our learning technologies contract. It is not normal commercial practice to disclose the number of bidders, but in this case I believe there is an overcompensating public interest in disclosure, to show that we made a positive choice when awarding this work.

The two strongest bidders were very close, with different strengths. But in the end our process produced a clear front-runner, which was the Gazelle-led consortium.

They won the contract because their bid was convincing in the depth of knowledge and understanding it displayed; dynamic and innovative; pedagogy-focused not technology-focused; and above all with learner benefit at its heart.

This programme will provide support across the education and training sector, including colleges, private training providers and others (it is not aimed at any particular group of providers).

Gazelle will be assisted by its consortium partners: the Association of Colleges, Association of Employment and Learning Providers, 157 Group, and the National Foundation for Educational Research, together with a wider steering group that they are convening to oversee the programme.

More generally, I recognise there will be scepticism in some quarters from time to time about some of our awards going to ‘usual suspects’ around the sector.

But it would be quite wrong to let those ‘noises off’ affect an impartial and objective process of contract awarding.

My board and I are very clear: the ETF is an outcomes-focused organisation in everything we do.

Our contracting model is set up to support that.

All our contractors are 100 per cent clear that they must demonstrate impact for learners (and employers where appropriate) throughout the work.

Any contractor that cannot deliver on the promise of its plans will see swift remedial action taken, the ultimate of which is contract termination. No contractor is too big to fail.

Learning technology is evolving rapidly and its potential is huge.

The biggest inhibitor to its success is lack of workforce capacity to exploit it.

The ETF is focusing energetically on helping the whole workforce — including leaders — to recognise and utilise the power of learning technology.

That is what our contract is designed to do, and that is what we will deliver through it, whoever happens to be our successful contractor of the day.

Preparing for a second year of 14 to 16 provision at college

Nine colleges are looking to join the ranks of the existing seven that have been allowed by the Department for Education to recruit 14 to 16-year-olds directly. A year after his own college started direct recruitment, Lee Probert looks at what lessons have been learned.

September 2013 saw our Hull and Goole colleges welcome 100 young people to study their key stage four programme with us, following Professor Alison Wolf’s recommendation that colleges should be allowed to enrol 14 to 16-year-olds directly.

While this cohort of students had a new legal status for us, welcoming them to the colleges built on a long track record of partnership delivery with schools for key stage four provision.

In the two years leading up to launching the HCUK 14 to 16 college we had worked with the local authority to deliver the Energy League, a cohort of full-time 14 to 16-year-olds who transferred from a school as part of a managed closure.

Key to success in setting up this provision has been ensuring an appropriate balance of high quality national curriculum provision as well as a rich vocational diet alongside. Specialist pathways have been offered which complement local enterprise partnership priorities in engineering, construction, sport, health and care, creative and digital media, renewable technologies and logistics.

Across the group of colleges we can offer progression routes through FE and into higher education at undergraduate and post graduate levels.  This has proved to be significant in supporting young people and parents to commit to a change in education provider at 14.

A specialist and focused curriculum with good progression routes to further learning and employment has led to us securing a full mixed ability cohort of young people. Young people in our 14 to 16 college are rightly proud to be part of it, having been selected following interview.

The admissions process is individual to each child involving their parent or guardian making an application directly to the colleges. Students have chosen us as much as we’ve chosen them. This stage is critical to ensuring that we have offered places to students who can truly benefit from a college learning environment. It’s not easy to obtain transition information for individual students and therefore this investment in the admissions and initial assessment process is critical.

Investing in dedicated staff whose primary responsibility is to the 14 to 16 college demonstrates our commitment to this as a new and important part of the group as well as ensuring we have the right skills and expertise to work with 14 to 16-year-olds.

Alongside a dedicated senior leader for 14 to 16 provision, we’ve appointed an experienced secondary head teacher, special educational needs coordinator and experienced GCSE teaching staff. This core team works alongside our experienced and industry qualified vocational staff to offer complementary skills and experience to the curriculum offer.

Our 14 to 16 college is based in a dedicated zone offering the students a choice of bustling college life or their own private and safe space. The newly created 14 to 16 zone houses the designated teaching space to support national curriculum delivery as well as their own social space.

Students selected their own informal branded uniform giving them a sense of identity and community within the college. Almost all 100 students have a dedicated mentor who has volunteered to work with them for the duration of their programme. Trained mentors are drawn from college staff in senior leadership, teaching and support roles as well as A-level students. These relationships support progress and achievement as well as provide a point of contact for pastoral support.

There are bespoke policies and procedures as well as new data sets and tracking to become familiar with. Specialist training for staff and a discrete policy framework ensures that each student’s needs are met as well as ensuring that our offer is consistently high quality. Ofsted said we had made significant progress in all areas following our monitoring visit and reflected that we had often exceeded minimum requirements.

As we look forward to the current year 10 moving to year 11, following the obligatory prom night we’ll welcome more than 100 new year 10s to the 14 to 16 colleges in Hull and Goole in September 2014. This reflects our commitment to investing in this new college financially along with leadership time.

Dedicated open evenings, taster events and above all the experience of our students makes this a part of college-life which is here to stay.

What’s the ‘interest rate’ on FE loans now? 

When I wrote in FE Week three months ago about the second annual round of FE Loans, the new application process had just opened. A few months on, what’s happening? Where are things heading?

Most notably, moves to extend FE loans ‘downwards’ — both for age and level — have begun, and many preparing for the 2013-14 round saw this as inevitable for several reasons.

A recent consultation by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) makes several proposals. If adopted, loans to cover fees will also apply to 19 to 23-year-olds taking certain kinds of level two learning, in addition to 24+ learners taking level three and four courses.

Funding for HNC and HND would move from the university sector into FE’s orbit, and loans. Part of that reflects concerns over ‘bogus’ colleges and learners; FE arrangements are easier to monitor.

Some providers didn’t engage with that first round, though, since they had few or no learners over 23, and/or little or no learning beyond level two. Some may even have retreated from those ‘older’ and/or ‘higher’ fields.

If the consultation’s suggestions are adopted, however, they may well apply to courses from August 2015. Thus, many FE providers not much involved with loans may need to re-consider their strategic and operational positions, to plan for this coming year and implementation thereafter.

Having been involved in Learning and Skills Improvement Service support for providers towards the first round of loans, I’m convinced that successful and less successful FE loans ventures depend first and foremost on attitude and mindset within providers. That strongly affects the ‘mood music’ throughout all parts of the organisation, and its community, and that can have big impacts on messages and take-up. Where it’s in a minor key, learners can walk away, and everybody loses.

Those who were doubtful or even hostile had their reasons, of course. But if that restricts or even prevents participation, then there’s a problem for us all.

Loans for many kinds of FE learning aren’t going away (a general election notwithstanding), and indeed, their territory is spreading. So it may be time to embrace the concept more wholeheartedly. Even those with real philosophical doubts should see some real potential advantages.

That can be a ‘tough ask’, whether at the strategic level and/or at the front line. Investing in your post-school education and training just isn’t as strong a tradition or philosophy in Britain as it is elsewhere. Things may be changing, but perhaps not quickly and solidly enough.

One possible new sign of continued hesitations, despite some encouraging statistics, lies in the set of April-May 2014 figures for the new round of 24+ loan applications. Where we might have expected increases compared to the corresponding period last year, through the system settling and building momentum, take-up so far this time looks to be around half of the same period in 2013.

It’s early days and there may be many explanations. But, even given the removal of apprenticeships (which accounted for few applications last time, anyway), the picture so far raises some concerns.

How many learners may have been put off, for whatever reason? What’s been the impact of ‘mindset’?

Perhaps it will indeed turn round, over coming months. Yet, a total loans budget of £129m for 2013-14 was apparently by no means fully used. For this financial year, that’s more than tripled to £398m.

The trend needs to be much more sharply upwards, soon. If not, then the implications for the sector, and the nation, are a worry — and particularly given the shrinking of the adult skills budget, and the proposed ‘double-downwards’ expansion. This income stream matters, and increasingly so.

Finally, here’s a bit of ‘wish-fulfilment’. An earlier BIS consultation considered how loans for higher education could accommodate the beliefs of many Muslims, for whom the conventional ideas of borrowing and interest are unacceptable. The likeliest system to be adopted is one based on the concept of ‘takaful’ — shared benefit and obligation. Simply put, this involves a fund built up by a community, allowing its members to draw on the money contributed. They then contribute back into the fund in turn, as and when possible.

It’s an interesting approach. And, it’s a quite familiar one in some parts of the Western world, especially England: think of the ideals and methods of the early co-operative movement, ‘mutuals’, and friendly societies. Why not?

The BIS consultation suggests that this could also happen for FE loans. A logical question arises: if such a ‘takaful’ system can be used for Muslim learners, both in higher education and FE, why couldn’t it also apply to all learners?