Meeting 6.5k pledge will still lead to college teacher shortfall, NAO warns

The government’s spending watchdog has urged ministers to publish their plan for achieving Labour’s manifesto pledge of recruiting 6,500 additional teachers – but revealed meeting the target will not be enough to address worsening shortages in colleges.

MPs today warned that it will be “very challenging” to meet the goal as a report by the National Audit Office found the Department for Education has estimated between 8,400 and 12,400 FE teachers are needed by 2028/29 to meet the rising demographic needs and to deliver T Levels.

It comes after the new Labour government pledged last summer to recruit an additional 6,500 teachers for schools and further education colleges by the end of Parliament, or spring 2029 at the latest.

Today’s NAO report said the FE sector is the “worst affected” type of education provider by long-term recruitment pressures with 5.1 of every 100 teaching roles vacant in general FE colleges. This amounts to 2,500 empty positions in colleges as opposed to 1,500 schoolteacher vacancies.

The report found issues with DfE’s data collection of the FE workforce, the department’s minor influence in setting teacher pay and vagueness around setting the initial 6,500 recruitment target.

It recommended that the government “fully assess, balance and manage” the implications for value for money, affordability, responding to future teaching requirements and demographics, as well as providing “greater transparency” around what the 6,500 pledge means in practice for colleges.

DfE cannot explain where 6,500 figure came from

The NAO revealed that Labour could not explain how it decided on the 6,500-recruitment figure. 

DfE also did not explain how the target would be split across mainstream schools, special schools and further education colleges nor did it allude how many extra teachers are expected each year in each setting.

“As such, it is not clear if, or how, this number relates to known and forecast shortages across different settings,” the report said.

Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, said that meeting the government’s pledge for 6,500 more teachers will be “very challenging”.

“Even if met, it is not clear that this will be enough to fix the nationwide shortage of teachers amidst growing numbers of students,” he said. 

The NAO recommended that DfE bring together a cross-sector “package of initiatives that are affordable, cost-effective, and get at the root causes of challenges”.

“Although its 2019 recruitment and retention strategy focused on schools, DfE is now thinking about these challenges from a cross-system perspective, and in relation to their relative cost and impact, to help focus its efforts. The government’s pledge to provide an additional 6,500 teachers by the end of this Parliament has added urgency to this work,” the report said.

Pepe Di’Iasio, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said: “Virtually every school and college in the country is having to manage teacher shortages because of long-standing nationwide recruitment and retention problems.

“The last government failed to address this issue and it is not clear how the current government intends to achieve its pledge of recruiting 6,500 new teachers or whether this will be anywhere near enough.”

Di’Iasio added: “We’ve had no end of piecemeal policies but the overriding factors remain unresolved – pay levels are not competitive enough and workload and stress is driving teachers out of the profession.”

Recruiting 6,500 teachers ‘unlikely’ until pay gap solved

While DfE has no influence on setting pay rates in FE, it does have “some influence” over teacher salaries, such as supporting Treasury in setting funding allocations and teacher funding packages as part of wider government spending decisions, the report said.

The NAO highlighted that the difference in median salary between schools and FE teachers was around £10,000 but is further exacerbated compared with industry salaries (see below graph).

For example, engineering professionals in industry are paid over £8,000 more than an equivalent further education teacher, and IT professionals earn over £11,000 more, DfE analysis suggests.

NAO authors also examined a host of financial and non-financial incentives to encourage teachers to stay after finding “particular challenges” around retention of FE teachers early in their career.

For example, of 6,970 new teachers in 2018, only 43 per cent were still teaching after five years.

It warned that DfE cannot realistically rely on pay alone, referencing previous research from the National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER) that while increasing pay for all teachers could deliver the required number, “it would require an additional £4.9 billion per year by 2026/27”.

DfE told the NAO that it is “primarily considering” expanding existing financial incentives that it knows are effective to meet the 6,500 figure.

The NAO report said: “Its proposals will need to include requests to scale up existing financial initiatives to help meet the 6,500 target, alongside core funding so settings can pay the salaries of the additional teachers. It expects to agree a plan in summer 2025, a year after the pledge was announced and four years before the latest date for the end of this Parliament, the timeframe for delivering the pledge.”

David Hughes, chief executive of Association of Colleges, said achieving DfE’s estimated of between 8,400 to 12,400 more teachers by 2028/29 is “increasingly unlikely” until the pay gap is solved, hopefully at the upcoming spending review.

“Achieving that growth looks increasingly unlikely unless and until the pay gap between colleges and schools and with industry are closed,” he said. “Other activities can and do help, but in the end the pay gap becomes the biggest barrier. Without addressing that quickly, DfE will have to acknowledge that government ambitions on its missions will be severely hampered.”

Comparison of median pay between school teachers and FE teachers, source: NAO

In July 2023, DfE announced additional further education funding of £185 million for 2023-24 and £285 million for 2024-25, which the majority of colleges used for prioritising the recruitment and retention of teaching staff and giving a uniform percentage pay rise to existing teaching staff.

In the 2024 budget statement, an additional £300 million for FE for 2025-26 was announced, but the NAO was told most of the funding is needed cover the additional teaching costs associated with rising 16 to 19 student numbers, rather than used to increase salaries.

“DfE recognises that the lack of funding for further education teacher pay could put at risk its growth and opportunity missions, alongside its commitment to recruit 6,500 new teachers,” the report added.

Data and forecasting ‘lack supporting evidence’

The Department for Education told the NAO that secondary school student numbers rose from 3.2 million to 3.7 between 2015/16 and 2023/24 and are set to increase and peak in 2028.

“These numbers will subsequently impact further education, which DfE predicts will need an additional 8,400 to 12,400 teachers by 2028/29, compared with 2020/21 levels, to meet demographic pressures and deliver T Levels,” the report said.

But the NAO found that DfE does not use its further education workforce model, which is supposed identify gaps and trends in the availability of teachers, to set targets for how many teachers it needs. 

The report said the FE model is more “uncertain” than the schools model and “often lack supporting evidence”.

The model assumes teacher numbers will remain constant over time, which was an assumption DfE acknowledged was “highly unlikely” to be correct but has not compared its forecast of teacher numbers with more recent data.

DfE told the NAO authors that it is reviewing its assumptions but could not provide further details, given the early stages of the work.

The NAO recommended more cross-sector data collection after it found different methodologies and differing data collection timescales between the existing annual school workforce census and further education workforce data collection.

The report added that DfE is exploring ways to monitor progress more frequently, such as quarterly updates for schools to overcome the time lag of data being published. However, it said this would not be relevant to further education.

A DfE spokesperson said: “A high-quality FE workforce is critical to delivering the skills learners need to get on in life and drive growth in our economy, and this is why we are investing significantly in FE teachers.   

“Despite challenging fiscal circumstances, the Government has announced that we will be spending over £400m more on 16-19 education in the 2025-26 financial year. Early career teachers in key technical subjects are also eligible to receive up to £6,000 per year under our Targeted Retention Incentive scheme. This will support colleges to recruit and retain the skilled teachers they need and drive our Plan for Change.”

“Colleges are responsible for managing their own budgets, including setting staff pay.”

Team UK for EuroSkills 2025 announced

Nineteen talented apprentices and students from across the UK will travel to Denmark this September to compete in their trades against Europe’s best at the EuroSkills competition.

The group, who are specialising in skills such as cabinetmaking, joinery, and hairdressing will go head-to-head against hundreds of their European peers in Herning from September 9 to 13.

The competition will bring together 600 young professionals to compete in 38 skills.

John Doherty, Euroskills 2025 competitor in mechatronics

In the lead up to the event, the team members, who have already undergone months of intense training, will ramp up their intensive training programme with pressure tests to push their capability to compete under pressure.

EuroSkills is the largest competition before the next global WorldSkills, which will take place next year in Shanghai, China.

John Doherty, the Euroskills competitor in mechatronics who trains at Southern Regional College, said: “I’m buzzing about the news, it’s going to be a brilliant opportunity.”

He added: “When I first started with WorldSkills UK three years ago, I didn’t think I would get this far but I have loved the thrill of competing and am really excited about taking part in EuroSkills.”

Accrington and Rossendale College learner Shelby Fitzakerly, who is a Team UK member in the painting and decorating skill, said: “It’s absolutely amazing to be selected for Team UK. Competing in Europe will definitely help my career, I’m so excited about this opportunity.”

Ben Blackledge, chief executive WorldSkills UK said the European competition is ultimately “a test of how internationally competitive UK skills are”.

“It gives us the impetus to raise standards at home and help more young people get high quality jobs,” he said.

Shelby Fitzakerly EuroSkills 2025 competitor in painting and decorating

He added: “We are so excited to be supporting and nurturing this fantastic group of young professionals as they head for Denmark to compete.”

Skills minister Jacqui Smith said: “Congratulations to all those chosen for the EuroSkills team, it’s a fantastic achievement and a unique opportunity to showcase the strength of UK skills on the European stage.

“These young people represent the ambition and expertise being developed through our further education system, which is central to building a workforce fit for the future.

“High-quality skills are at the heart of our Plan for Change, helping to grow the economy and support people into good jobs. WorldSkills UK does vital work to raise standards and ambition across technical education.”

‘Short-sighted’: DfE controversially cuts ASK careers scheme funding

The Department for Education has been accused of being “short-sighted” after it axed funding for a flagship careers programme focusing on apprenticeships and T Levels.

The Apprenticeship Support and Knowledge (ASK) Programme is a national scheme aiming to raise awareness of career options with school and college students, teachers and parents since 2015.

Activities ASK funds include assemblies, workshops, mock interviews, training for teachers, and presentations for parents.

But the Department for Education (DfE), which ultimately funds ASK, has confirmed that funding will end from August this year.

In a letter sent to providers, DfE officials said funding will end “given the programme’s success and the tight fiscal climate”.

The news comes only one year after management of the programme was handed from the DfE to the Careers and Enterprise Company (CEC) – a non-profit quango that describes itself as the “national body for careers education”.

FE Week understands a handful of DfE partner organisations and services including the CEC are expecting cuts to their overall funding this financial year.

‘Truly shocked’

The news has been met with shock and disappointment from local providers, who say the programme has boosted social mobility by ensuring thousands of young people, teachers and parents are aware of their career options outside of academia.

Sharron Robbie, chief executive officer of Devon and Cornwall Training Providers Network, an ASK provider in the south west, said: “We are truly shocked at this news – careers advice especially advice that is impartial, based on local knowledge and expertise is absolutely key to ensuring young people are able to make informed choices about their futures.”

She added that defunding ASK is “short-sighted” as it has helped give apprenticeships “parity” over other post-16 options and helped young people from deprived backgrounds into “sustainable and rewarding careers”.

The DfE recently committed £3.4 million for ASK, with £2.14 million paid last financial year and £1.27 million this year, according to grant agreements published last year.

While ASK is managed nationally by CEC, supported by Amazing Apprenticeships, it is regionally overseen by four regional prime contractors, who in turn contract delivery out to a network of local providers.

A DfE spokesperson declined to comment on funding cuts to the CEC and other organisations, arguing that figures yet to be “finalised” and the department does not comment on “speculation”.

Support still exists

The spokesperson pointed to the volunteer apprenticeship and T Level ambassador networks as alternative sources of information.

They said: “Many schools and colleges have established links with technical education providers and networks.

“There is a range of digital and in-person support available to raise awareness of apprenticeships and technical education, including through the apprenticeship and T Level ambassador networks and other local support, coordinated through the Careers and Enterprise Company’s national network of careers hubs.”

A spokesperson for CEC said: “The Careers & Enterprise Company wants to extend its sincere thanks to all providers for their work in delivering this programme and supporting young people. 

“At CEC, we remain fully committed to ensuring every young person can access high-quality careers education and meaningful pathways into the world of work.

“Supporting schools and colleges in helping young people explore apprenticeships and technical education to help every young person find their best next step remains a core priority for us.”

Alex Miles, managing director of ASK provider Yorkshire Learning Providers, said it was “the wrong time” to withdraw funding given incoming apprenticeship reforms and rising youth inactivity levels.

She added: “I’ve agreed to invest some of our reserves to continue the activity because I think it’s completely wrong for social mobility that school engagement stops on a knife edge.”

Simon Ashworth, deputy CEO of the Association of Employment and Learning Providers, said: “Given that the government’s stated ambition in wanting more young people to take up apprenticeships or technical education pathways, we are disappointed that the Apprenticeship Support & Knowledge (ASK) programme will not be extended and will end this summer.

“This is a programme that’s helped raise awareness of apprenticeships in schools through thousands of bespoke interventions – not just for young people, but for teachers too.”

South west colleges reignite merger talks

Two south west colleges have re-opened merger talks ten years after first floating the idea of joining forces.

Governors at Devon’s Exeter College and Petroc have today said merging now would provide “additional resilience against funding reductions” and “an unmatched and nationally significant curriculum for young people”. They first explored merging in 2015.

The two colleges stressed that the merger is “voluntary” and will now enter a period of due diligence and public consultation with the aim of a final vote by both boards in November. 

Combining figures both colleges’ latest finances, the merged institution could have around 17,000 learners in total and a combined income of just over £96 million. 

In a statement today, the colleges said the new group would create “a regional education and skills powerhouse with the ability invest, innovate and deliver ‘the exceptional’ for Devon”.

Exeter College has been rated ‘outstanding’ in its most recent two Ofsted inspections and attracted just over 12,600 funded learners, mostly 16-18 year-olds, in academic year 2023-24. It recorded ‘good’ financial health in its latest accounts. 

In its most recent inspection, Petroc was downgraded from ‘good’ to ‘requires improvement’. Its latest financial health score was also ‘requires improvement’.

Merger proposals come almost a year after Sean Mackney suddenly quit as principal of Petroc. The college has been led since then by interim principal and CEO Kurt Hintz.

Both colleges promise “business as usual” as merger talks progress.

Another large college merger is in progress in neighbouring Somerset. 

Next week, a public consultation on the merger of Bridgwater and Taunton College and Strode College closes. The new group, proposed to be called University Centre Somerset College Group (UCS College Group) aims to form this August.

Eureka! Science trainer given Ofsted’s highest grade

A healthcare and science specialist training provider has been judged ‘outstanding’ after inspectors found students “excellently prepared for their future roles”.

Birmingham-based CSR Scientific Training Limited, which trains over 450 apprentices and 28 bootcamp learners online, was upgraded to Ofsted’s top mark in a report published today.

The watchdog praised the provider’s “highly ambitious” curriculum and “skilful” work with a “large range” of employers, such as the NHS, the universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Pfizer and the police service, to “co-design curriculums that align precisely to meet local and national skills needs”.

Adult learners “quickly develop important practical skills that are in very high demand” and develop “strong and worthwhile scientific and analytical skills that prepare them excellently for their future roles”, inspectors said.

CSR is a private company established in 2007 and was formerly known as Crime Scene Resources Limited. It gained its first direct contract to deliver apprenticeships in 2017 and moved into bootcamps delivery recently.

A spokesperson for the provider said: “CSR is incredibly proud of this achievement which is a true reflection of the hard work and dedication of our team, our learners and our employer partners.” 

Ofsted said CSR learners show “very high levels” of commitment to their studies and are “very ambitious for their futures and routinely achieve the highest possible grades in their qualifications”.

“Passionate” learners visit local schools to promote the benefits of studying an apprenticeship in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) subjects, compete in the “Pipette Olympics”, as well as participate in activities to promote women into STEM.

Leaders were praised for ensuring that learners and apprentices receive “beneficial career advice that informs them well about the range of opportunities available to them after completing their studies”, with a high proportion of apprentices joining professional bodies to become more employable.

And “well-experienced” governors hold leaders and managers to account. They have been “instrumental in supporting leaders to improve the quality of curriculums that they offer”.

CSR’s spokesperson said: “The hard work does not stop here and we will continue striving to deliver high quality, employer driven programmes within the booming STEM sector where our learners can continue to demonstrate their talents and hard work.”

Photo: CSR staff

From vengeance to compassion: The conversation that shattered my hate

I didn’t know a great deal about restorative justice before 2008. I was appearing as a guest artist at the ‘Get In’ Festival in Liverpool where I met Jim Moriaty, artistic director of Te Rekau community theatre company based in New Zealand. Jim’s commitment to theatre as a tool for change has helped transform the lives of many of his country’s most vulnerable people.

The company takes young offenders and puts them through a rigorous residential programme aimed at addressing the root causes of their behaviours and attempting to repair the harms that they have caused. This programme is carried out in partnership with the New Zealand justice system as an alternative to custodial sentencing; something that notable political figures including former justice ministers David Gaulk and Rory Stewart have called for here.

Jim had brought along a young person working with the company, devising and touring a performance to communities affected by offending behaviour. It was clear this process had had a remarkable effect on them. I’ve worked in many prison, probation and youth offending settings and rarely meet someone who has, in well-fitting cliched terms, literally ‘turned his life around’.

A year later my younger brother, aged 38, was murdered in a frenzied knife attack by a 17-year-old neighbour – someone he’d shown great kindness to, in recognition of the turbulent life this boy had endured.  So began an endless whirlwind of trauma, grief and despair navigating the criminal justice system.

Advised by counsel, he took a ‘manslaughter on the grounds of diminished responsibility’ charge and five years later was knocking at the door of the parole board.

Two successful appeals later we were running out of options. After less than eight years in prison, he due for release on licence.

It had been a difficult few years. My brother’s beloved wife, adored two young sons and close friends had really struggled with the brutal and meaningless manner of his passing. I’d been the first person at the scene of the killing, and that sight will be forever in my mind. I’d never envisaged myself at a murder crime scene or in a morgue, courtroom or prison but all that was my new reality.

In my rage and pain, I had deeply disturbing dreams about the offender killing myself and my family. When my wife (DfE student support champion Polly Harrow) gently suggested we consider restorative justice, I thought she’d lost her mind. But she told me how we dehumanise and demonise through disconnection, separation and avoidance.  How the threat becomes so much bigger in your imagination.

The alternative, it seemed, was to continue through a living hell.

We went through months of thorough preparation with probation; I had to work out how to address the person I’d been harbouring such violent and vengeful feelings towards. Then there we were, sitting across a table from him, looking into his eyes in a ridiculously normal office with tired furniture: me, Polly, the probation team and his advocate.

Those two and a half hours literally changed my life. It was like pulling the curtain to find the Wizard of Oz was just an ordinary mortal with seemingly no ill intent. He was 24 and looked like a lost little boy.

Did he say sorry? Yes. Did he seem remorseful? Yes. Did his words help? How could they?

Were we meant to forgive, to forget, to understand? Could we?

As I spoke to him, there was a visible shift. I was beginning to feel emboldened and able to speak my mind clearly. I finally had empowered myself against this most dreaded of threats. He was finally confronting our truth and coming to terms, in the most personal and direct way, of the consequences of his murderous actions.

 Our last words to him were “You owe it to us, to his children, to make something of yourself, to be the best version of yourself, to cause no more harm and to live a good life”. We left in stunned silence as we digested what had occurred. We learned afterwards that he said “I want to do better…for them.” In that moment we had become his emotionally available adults, something he had little experience of in his fractured young life. We had shown him empathy, and the whole room felt the extraordinary weight of that compassion looking into the face of a murderer.

My young nephews had suffered with severe anxiety about his release and whether he would seek them out. I was able to tell them with certainty they no longer needed to live in fear. Out of all of it, that was the most significant thing I could have said to those heartbroken children.

I could not have entered or completed this life-changing process without Polly’s unwavering support and wisdom. In our professional lives, we have both gone on to advocate for and train educators in restorative practice to reduce issues of conflict with their students and help build their abilities to heal relationships. This is something we vehemently believe in; we know that it works.

Only builder bootcamps extended as scheme dismantled

National skills bootcamp contracts will only be extended for courses in the construction sector, the government has told providers. 

In an update email, the Department for Education said it would only “continue to fund” contracts procured via its national dynamic purchasing system in construction. 

A separate email to bootcamp providers for other sectors such as digital, health and care confirmed contracts will not be extended. 

The nationally contracted construction courses – which include skills such as groundworks, bricklaying, carpentry and heat pump installation – will be funded with £100 million for 35,000 learners, confirmed during the Chancellor’s Spring Statement last month

On Thursday, the DfE’s work-based learning directorate sent an email to providers with existing contracts saying they have until May 9 to request an extension that will be capped at 50 per cent of the original contract value. 

Meanwhile, providers of non-construction bootcamps were told: “We are grateful for the key role you play in upskilling and reskilling adults, and for your contribution and commitment to adult skills training, and will be continuing to work with you to support you to maximise completions and outcomes in your contract.” 

New contracts start in August 

Officials hope to reach a decision on construction bootcamps “by the end of June” with training to start in August and complete by March 31 next year at the latest. 

Mark Dawe, chief executive of bootcamp provider The Skills Network, which does not provide construction bootcamps, said: “While not a surprise, it is disappointing that such a popular programme will not be supported on a national basis when we have thousands of learners who we’re now unable to support.” 

The DfE update said extensions will only be available to providers that hit 50 per cent of their target starts, have dropout rates of 15 per cent or less, and an 80 per cent or above completion rate. 

However, it has chosen not to require a minimum level of positive job outcomes such as gaining a new role or new or increased responsibilities, which are a key measure of bootcamps’ success. 

The national contracts, awarded via a dynamic purchasing system, were worth over half a billion pounds between 2022 and 2025. 

Locally funded bootcamps continue 

Bootcamps commissioning for other sectors, such as creative industries or digital, will continue to be funded locally, via ringfenced grants that the DfE hands to mayoral combined authorities, the Greater London Authority and some local authorities. 

However, although grants to each authority were confirmed ahead of the current financial year, procurement is at different stages of planning or delivery across the country. 

Ian Ross, chief executive officer of bootcamp provider Whitehead-Ross Education, said: “With many local authorities yet to release their skills bootcamps tenders, we’re going to see a postcode lottery with some parts of the country having no skills bootcamps provision in place until the summer.” 

A DfE spokesperson said: “Skills Bootcamps remain an important part of government-funded skills provision and we recently committed £100 million of additional funding for Skills Bootcamps to address skills gaps in the construction sector.

“We are currently evolving the delivery of Skills Bootcamps through funding local areas directly, giving them more control over skills development and supporting more people into work.

“These ongoing changes will further develop Skills Bootcamps to make sure they deliver high-quality training.”

Weston chair felt powerless over £2.5m payments to former principal

The former chair of Weston College has admitted £2.5 million in hidden payments handed to former principal Sir Paul Phillips was an inappropriate use of public funds – but claimed he was powerless to stop them.

Andrew Leighton-Price (pictured), who stood down from the governing body last year following the launch of a government investigation, spoke exclusively to FE Week about the scandal that was exposed during the Easter break.

Earlier this month, FE Commissioner Shelagh Legrave’s report revealed serious “governance failures” at the seaside college, with £2.5 million of undeclared payments made to its then principal Sir Paul Phillips between 2017 and 2023.

But Leighton-Price refuted the FEC’s claim that governors “concealed” payments, and instead blamed college auditors and expressed a fear that Phillips would sue if he did not get what he was contractually due.

Leighton-Price joined the Weston College board in 2015 and became chair in 2019. He stepped aside in May 2024 when the FE Commissioner’s intervention began. He then officially stood down in October, claiming his eight-year term limit was up.

Presidential role

The Department for Education deployed fraud investigators to probe “funding irregularities” after an FE Week investigation in 2023 revealed Phillips would get a paid “presidential” role following his retirement.

The following month, Legrave and her team interviewed the former principal, ex-governors, former clerks to the corporation, and internal and external auditors.

The long-awaited report exposed board failures to ensure the college demonstrated value for money and accountability of public funds.

Phillips was secretly paid £2.5 million more than was officially declared between 2017 and 2023 through a combination of bonuses, allowances and benefits, including a £909,000 retention payment.

Corrected college financial statements, published on the same day as the FEC report, revealed Phillips was paid a staggering £1,898,000 when he retired in 2023.

The report said the “majority” of these previously undeclared payments were not approved by the full board of governors.

Instead, the college had a “small group of trusted governors” in a remuneration committee who made decisions on Phillips’ pay. These decisions were not reported to the full board.

Leighton-Price said he did not recognise the £2.5 million figure but admitted Phillips’ payments were an “awful lot of money”.

Now he’s no longer a member of the college board, he admitted he’d “probably say no”, the payments were not an appropriate or good use of public funds.

“My opinion didn’t really come into it if I’m honest. It was a legal agreement. We were given the figures by the auditors,” he said.

Phillips’ total earnings for 2022 were £837,000, up from an originally stated £362,000. This was due to a £90,000 increase in his basic salary and a £372,000 performance bonus. Leighton-Price could not explain the rise in Phillips’ basic salary.

He refuted that the payments were hidden from public disclosure or from auditors, as claimed by the FEC.

“The auditors were told everything that was in there,” he said.

“The board is given a set of accounts by the auditors, and they work with the finance department. They don’t work with governors, and we don’t make the accounts up.”

Leighton-Price added that governors would see the college accounts for “probably” an hour for discussion before they were approved.

“As chair of the board, I was fulfilling a legal agreement,” he said. So, was I culpable in that area? Yes.”

‘Easy to blame governors’

The FEC placed Tim Jackson as interim chair in May 2024.

Leighton-Price said he stepped aside as “protocol”. His subsequent cooperation with the investigation comprised a 30-minute interview with Legrave, during which he was asked about minutiae from board meetings from years prior. He added it would have been easier to provide information if he had been given “a little bit of warning”.

Did he think Legrave’s report was fair?

“How can I put this politely… Yes,” he said.

“My impression was that, following my half-hour interview with Shelagh, it was always going to be the governors that were going to bear the brunt of it.”

He was shocked by “most” of her findings and claimed that governors were “all being put down to try and ram home the point that governance was not good at Weston College”.

He claimed it was “very easy” to blame things on governors, and added: “There is really not a lot of safety for governors in these areas.

“Governance is such a tricky thing, you’re held to account and yet you don’t work there. You rely heavily on the information you’re given, and that’s all you can go on.

“I think governance probably hasn’t kept up with the demands of the modern FE college, if I’m honest.”

‘We had no other option’

Regarding the £909,000 retention payment, governors “had no other option other than to pay or be sued by Sir Paul Phillips,” the former chair told FE Week.

The report said the board of governors signed a retention agreement in 2011, which allowed for an “annual accrual” of retention value for Phillips to keep him in post. Phillips served as principal of Weston College for 22 years.

Phillips confirmed to BBC News that undeclared payments were “contractually due” and the retention scheme was needed because, “during my extensive tenure at the college, approaches from other organisations occurred and therefore the college introduced a retention scheme to retain me”.

Leighton-Price said he became aware of the retention package around “six years ago” when he became chair, and it was brought up in an audit committee.

“We did push back at the time when we initially found out about it, but it was pointed out to us, it was a legal agreement, and there was an element of course that Paul would not fulfil the requirements within the agreement,” he said.

In November 2022, Phillips was finally paid the £909,000 as a severance payment.

But it came with some strain. Phillips’ son Joe resisted paying the retention payment to his father in his capacity as Weston College’s chief operating officer, and supported his finance team in their refusal, according to evidence investigators found in the remuneration committee minutes.

Instead, the payment was initially made by the governors “under the authority of the remuneration committee”. 

On at least one occasion, the previous clerk to the board processed additional payments outside Phillips’ monthly salary “under the authority of the remuneration committee” because the finance team would not do it.

Leighton-Price claimed the board sought advice from the college’s auditors – though he could not confidently determine the identity of the firm – to make direct payments to Phillips after the chief operating officer refused.

Phillips received “a variety” of bonus payments which were presented to committee members as percentages rather than raw values, compounding the “lack of clarity”, the FEC said.

“Some members of the committee expressed surprise at the actual sums of money paid to the previous principal, despite being party to decisions on remuneration of the senior post-holder,” the report said.

When asked if Phillips deserved such a high payout, Leighton-Price said he was surprised at the cash value, but admitted he was aware of his total pay package as it had been presented by auditors.

“On one hand, you look at it, it was a successful college,” he said. “It’s gone from nothing to where it was. I can see why the original governors wanted to retain him. Personally, if it was me at that time, I probably wouldn’t have put in a retention payment.”

Leighton-Price said with hindsight, the retention package should have been run past officials at the Department for Education.

‘Money in his back pocket’

The FEC report caused a huge backlash amongst leaders and representatives in the sector.

Reacting to the negative public reaction, Leighton-Price said it was “very easy” to target Sir Paul, “whether he deserves some of it or not”.

“That’s up to those individuals who made those claims,” he said. “People always have a grievance against the leader of an organisation.”

In a post on LinkedIn, principal and CEO of Blackpool and the Fylde College Alun Francis labelled the episode “the worst example of unscrupulousness I have seen”.

He added: “When the college could have afforded a better pay rise, a small group of governors bizarrely thought it OK to stick it in the CEO’s back pocket – and even more bizarrely he thought it OK to take it.”

Weston College remains in intervention amid a separate DfE investigation into other undisclosed issues around financial controls.

Paul Phillips and the college’s former auditors were contacted for comment.

MOVERS AND SHAKERS: EDITION 494

Ian Ross

Non Executive Director, Federation of Small Businesses

Start date: April 2025

Concurrent: Chief Executive Officer, Whitehead-Ross Education

Interesting fact: Ian, who has held a private pilots license since 2004 and has over 300 hours of flying experience, has also been playing the trombone since school in various brass bands.


Susan Bonnet

Principal & Chief Executive, Morley College London

Start date: Summer 2025

Previous job: Principal, Ashford College (part of EKC Group)

Interesting fact: Prior to joining education, Susan spent 20 years as an international commercial film and media producer.